Notebookcheck Logo

宏碁 Swift Go 14 评测--Meteor Lake Core Ultra 7 的人工智能内核令人印象深刻

CPU、GPU 和现在的 NPU

至少从 Pixel 6 开始,用于人工智能应用的协处理器就开始出现在智能手机上。现在,神经网络加速器也出现在 Windows 笔记本电脑上,比如搭载英特尔酷睿 7 155H 处理器的宏碁 Swift Go 14。这是首批配备 NPU 的笔记本处理器之一。
Meteor Lake Intel Intel Evo Laptop / Notebook Windows Arc AI

距离我们评测宏碁 Swift Go 14 还不到两个月。那款产品给我们留下了深刻印象,性能出色,价格实惠。我们目前的评测设备配备了英特尔最新一代处理器。将于明年春季上市的宏碁 Swift Go 14 配备了 英特尔酷睿 155H.从硬件角度来看,宏碁为我们提供了一款基于标准规格设备的笔记本电脑。不过,到春季时,配套软件、性能管理和 BIOS 仍会有细微的改进。因此,在我们看到英特尔最新一代处理器为这款高端 OLED 显示屏机型带来哪些改进之前,我们不会对其进行评级。

在一些基准测试中,我们记录到的性能是搭载英特尔酷睿 i5-1335U 处理器的前代产品的两倍多。此外,英特尔的新 Arc iGPU 无疑会让许多游戏玩家感到高兴,因为英特尔的图形处理器现在至少可以与 Radeon RX 780M 相媲美。

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 (Swift Go 14 Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 16 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 55 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
Memory
32 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
14.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 243 PPI, ATNA40YK11-0, OLED, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA, 1024 GB 
, 850 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Headset, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 14.9 x 312.9 x 217.9
Battery
65 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: QHD
Primary Camera: 3.7 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2, Keyboard Light: yes
Weight
1.3338 kg, Power Supply: 360 g
Price
999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

英特尔本身经常将其新处理器与 AMD 的 Ryzen R7 7840U 进行比较,为此,我们将对同时配备英特尔和 AMD 处理器变体的惠普 Pavillon Plus 14 进行比较。Ayaneo Air 1S 可能是一个比较特别的代表,但这款设备也配备了 AMD 的强大竞争芯片。最后,LG Gram 2in1 和宏碁 Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 以及它们的第 13 代处理器为我们这组杰出的产品画上了圆满的句号。

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price

v (old)
12 / 2023
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1.3 kg14.9 mm14.00"2880x1800
85.6 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1.3 kg14.9 mm14.00"2880x1800
85.8 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.5 kg17.2 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.5 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.4 kg17.5 mm14.00"2880x1800
90.4 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
1.5 kg17.9 mm14.00"1920x1200
88.2 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2023
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M
443.8 g21 mm5.50"1920x1080
87.8 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M
1.4 kg18.8 mm14.00"2880x1800

外壳 - 角铝

尽管第一印象表明该设备没有发生任何变化,但我们仍然注意到宏碁对铝制外壳进行了细致的改进。棱角分明的边框设计没有暴露出任何制造缺陷,这意味着我们几乎可以复制粘贴前代产品的全部描述。不过,宏碁还是设法安装了一块更大的触摸板,从而明显改善了笔记本电脑的易用性。

尺寸比较

355 mm 248 mm 17.2 mm 1.5 kg317.7 mm 226.9 mm 17.9 mm 1.5 kg314 mm 227 mm 18.8 mm 1.4 kg314 mm 227 mm 17.5 mm 1.4 kg312.9 mm 217.9 mm 14.9 mm 1.3 kg224 mm 90 mm 21 mm 443.8 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

功能 - 超强的无线网络连接和一流的网络摄像头

通过 HDMI 2.1 和两个 Thunderbolt 4 端口,这款小型笔记本电脑最多可连接三台显示器。当前的英特尔流星湖处理器支持同时向四台显示器输出。同样,宏碁甚至还设法安置了一个 microSD 读卡器,甚至还有一个迷你 Kensington Lock 插槽。

存储卡读卡器(MicroSD)、3.5 毫米音频插孔、USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)、Kensington Lock 插槽
存储卡读卡器(MicroSD)、3.5 毫米音频插孔、USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)、Kensington Lock 插槽
2x 雷电 4/USB 4(USB-C;PowerDelivery,Displayport),HDMI,USB 3.2 Gen 1(USB-A)
2x 雷电 4/USB 4(USB-C;PowerDelivery,Displayport),HDMI,USB 3.2 Gen 1(USB-A)

SD 读卡器

microSD 读卡器没有任何改进。它的读取速度慢至 28 MB/s,与去年的型号相当,仅适用于少量数据。我们的 AV Pro microSD 读卡器的速度要快 10 倍。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Subnotebook
  (18.4 - 142, n=13, last 2 years)
52.8 MB/s +93%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
27.29 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Subnotebook
  (22.5 - 207, n=13, last 2 years)
64.3 MB/s +159%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
24.85 MB/s

交流

在使用 iPerf3 和华硕 GT-AXE11000 进行的 Wi-Fi 测试中,宏碁 Swift Go 在 5 GHz 和 6 GHz 网络中都表现出了相当高的传输速度。在家庭网络中,上传和下载速度高达 1.9 GBit/s。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
  (942 - 1622, n=26)
1358 MBit/s +3%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1319 (961min - 1533max) MBit/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (467 - 1824, n=55, last 2 years)
1264 MBit/s -4%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
  (872 - 1714, n=28)
1473 MBit/s +2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1441 (726min - 1755max) MBit/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (826 - 1775, n=55, last 2 years)
1426 MBit/s -1%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1569 (1027min - 1730max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
  (1229 - 1693, n=19)
1519 MBit/s -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (642 - 1792, n=26, last 2 years)
1267 MBit/s -19%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1742 (1441min - 1819max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
  (1327 - 1788, n=20)
1553 MBit/s -11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (951 - 1784, n=26, last 2 years)
1516 MBit/s -13%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1569 (1027-1730)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1741 (1441-1819)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1319 (961-1533)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1440 (726-1755)

网络摄像头

Windows 工作室效果和任务管理器
Windows 工作室效果和任务管理器

Acer Swift Go 的 QHD 网络摄像头带来了令人印象深刻的效果。得益于英特尔的 NPU 和 Windows Studio Effects,图像质量甚至还能再提高一些。不过,这需要对 iGPU 征税,正如你所预料的那样,宏碁 Swift Go 的风扇会迅速而响亮地发出声音。

ColorChecker
9.5 ∆E
9 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72: 9.11 ∆E min: 2.9 - max: 15.8 ∆E

安全

机上配备了指纹传感器、Kensington Lock 插槽和 TPM 2.0。这意味着所有与物理防盗和访问保护有关的基本安全要求都能得到满足。

维护

我们需要一把 TX5 螺丝刀和一个吸盘来打开宏碁 Swift Go。与 前代在笔记本电脑内部可以找到许多维护选项。两个 M.2 插槽(占用一个)和一个已安装的 Wi-Fi 模块可用。风扇可以轻松拆卸,以便清洁。只有大容量的 32 GB 内存是焊接的。顺便提一下,空闲的 M.2 插槽位于风扇旁边的带状电缆下面。

输入设备 - 大型触摸板


键盘

最重要的是,背光键的压力点可以再清晰一些。除此之外,这款键盘还能提供愉悦的键入体验。在黑暗环境中,按键背光可调节为两档。与前代产品类似,键盘上部的外壳也会有轻微的弯曲,这可能会让一些用户在用力按键时感到不适。

触摸板

在新版本中,宏碁大幅增加了 Swift Go 14 触摸板的尺寸,但四角的弧度依然保留。这一改变不仅有利于外观。在实际操作中,拖放和复制等许多操作都变得更加容易。现在的触摸板尺寸为 12 x 8 厘米,为输入和手势控制提供了更大的空间。

带背光键盘的主机
带背光键盘的主机

显示屏 - 2.8K、90Hz OLED 和 HDR500

子像素
子像素

采用流星湖处理器的宏碁 Swift Go 现在配备了亮度更高的 OLED 面板。在显示 HDR 内容时,它可以达到 400 cd/m²,甚至更高。深黑色和高对比度是此类显示技术的标准配置。亮度均匀,在 14 英寸(约 36 厘米)16:10 长宽比的 2.8K 分辨率下,肉眼几乎看不到单个像素。这一切都确保了我们能享受到无论是在户外还是在摄影棚灯光下都能大放异彩的出色画质。

Swift Go 的全新 AcerSense 应用程序提供了更多显示配置文件。不过,我们尚未观察到各种配置文件中的测量值有任何变化。正如开头提到的,宏碁仍在努力完善这款笔记本电脑的最终细节。

395
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
ATNA40YK11-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 396 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 391.2 cd/m² Minimum: 20.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 385 cd/m²
Contrast: 9440:1 (Black: 0.0411 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.79
ΔE Greyscale 2.61 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.99% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.75% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.772
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
ATNA40YK11-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
LP160WQ1-SPB2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
MNE007JA1-1, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14"
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo-OLED, OLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
Display
-6%
-3%
-22%
0%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
99.75
96.5
-3%
97.9
-2%
67.1
-33%
99.85
0%
99.8
0%
sRGB Coverage
99.99
99.9
0%
99.6
0%
97.8
-2%
100
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
98.56
84.6
-14%
92.1
-7%
69.4
-30%
99.71
1%
95.8
-3%
Response Times
-856%
-141%
-871%
-20%
75%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2.2 ?(1, 1.2)
38.4 ?(18.6, 19.8)
-1645%
10.8 ?(9.4, 1.4)
-391%
38.4 ?(18, 20.4)
-1645%
4.4 ?(2.6, 1.8)
-100%
0.82 ?(0.43, 0.39)
63%
Response Time Black / White *
12.8 ?(11.8, 1)
21.4 ?(9.8, 11.6)
-67%
9.29 ?(8.79, 0.5)
27%
25.1 ?(11.5, 13.6)
-96%
5 ?(2.5, 2.5)
61%
0.95 ?(0.44, 0.51)
93%
PWM Frequency
300
120 ?(100)
-60%
240 ?(300)
-20%
504.7 ?(100)
68%
Screen
-107%
65%
-32%
-42%
29%
Brightness middle
388
329
-15%
387
0%
398
3%
331
-15%
384
-1%
Brightness
391
310
-21%
387
-1%
379
-3%
339
-13%
386
-1%
Brightness Distribution
98
88
-10%
97
-1%
90
-8%
90
-8%
98
0%
Black Level *
0.0411
0.39
-849%
0.01
76%
0.23
-460%
0.07
-70%
Contrast
9440
844
-91%
38700
310%
1730
-82%
4729
-50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.32
3.52
44%
2.03
68%
1.3
79%
4.76
25%
4.06
36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.82
6.96
21%
3.86
56%
3.1
65%
9.2
-4%
6.73
24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.79
1.15
76%
1.6
67%
1.2
75%
5.04
-5%
0.49
90%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.61
5.75
-120%
2.3
12%
1.4
46%
8.79
-237%
1.1
58%
Gamma
1.772 124%
2.137 103%
2.23 99%
2.26 97%
2.155 102%
2.26 97%
CCT
6202 105%
7584 86%
6523 100%
6448 101%
7571 86%
6331 103%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-323% / -192%
-26% / 10%
-308% / -149%
-21% / -29%
34% / 33%

* ... smaller is better

亮度为 90
亮度为 90
亮度为 80
亮度为 80
亮度为 70
亮度为 70
亮度为 60
亮度为 60
50 % 亮度
50 % 亮度
亮度为 40
亮度为 40
亮度 30
亮度 30
20 % 亮度
20 % 亮度
亮度 10
亮度 10
0 % 亮度
0 % 亮度

出色的 OLED 几乎完全覆盖了所有三种色彩空间。只有 Adobe RGB 色彩空间还差 3%。

到目前为止,各种显示配置文件在测量色彩偏差方面没有任何改进,而目前的色彩偏差仍然很高。例如,在 Adobe RGB 色彩空间中,我们自己的 ICC 配置文件对色彩再现的改善很小。我们也可以认为,宏碁将在成品软件中对这方面进行改进。

Calman ColorChecker 未经校准
Calman ColorChecker 未经校准
未经校准的卡尔曼饱和度
未经校准的卡尔曼饱和度
未经校准的卡尔曼灰度
未经校准的卡尔曼灰度
Calman ColorChecker 已校准
Calman ColorChecker 已校准
卡尔曼饱和度校准
卡尔曼饱和度校准
卡尔曼灰度标定
卡尔曼灰度标定

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.8 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 300 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 300 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 300 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

尽管宏碁 Swift Go 采用的是亮面显示屏,但由于亮度高,因此在户外环境中表现出色。视角分析也没有发现任何异常。

性能 - Meteor Lake 将 Swift Go 打造成小型游戏机

新款宏碁 Swift Go 14 配备了英特尔流星湖处理器。这是 英特尔酷睿 7 155H还配备了 弧形 iGPU八个内核和一个 NPU。此外,该设备还配备了 32 GB DDR5 内存和 SK Hynix 1 TB NVMe 固态硬盘。

 
 
 

测试条件

正如开头所提到的,我们所面对的宏碁 Swift Go 14 是一款符合标准规格硬件的设备。我们评测机器的软件和固件还不够完善。例如,在我们的 Swift Go 14 中,提升性能的数值最初配置得有些过高。在测试过程中,我们还遇到了预装的 AlterView 的问题,它可以创建视觉上诱人的 3D 背景。在与宏碁进行了热烈的交流后,我们决定删除该软件。借助 TechPowerUp 的 Throttle Stop,我们还将 PL2 降低到 55 瓦,同时将 PL1 保持在 45 瓦。这有助于笔记本电脑更好、更稳定地运行。在最终的性能管理方面,宏碁将进行更细致的微调。这样,笔记本电脑的性能应该会比现在更好。

处理器

英特尔的新处理器带来了一些期待已久的变化。采用 7 纳米制造工艺的芯片首次提供了 NPU 和新的 Arc iGPU。处理器 酷睿至尊 7 155H内含六个 P 核心、八个 E 核心和两个额外的 LP E 核心,据说特别节能。这意味着总共有 22 个线程可用。

与最相似的第 13 代处理器相比,英特尔最新一代处理器的性能优势并不明显。在这里,我们面对的是两台配备英特尔酷睿 i7-13700H 的设备。同样,它提供六个 P 核心和八个 E 核心。只有两个低功耗 E 核心缺失。与直接竞争对手AMD Ryzen 7 7840U 相比,英特尔的最新处理器通常表现不俗。近来(令人惊讶的是),在 Cinebench R23 的单核性能方面,红队现在遥遥领先。我们已经发布了对新一代处理器的详细分析。

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

0125250375500625750875100011251250137515001625175018752000212522502375Tooltip
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2151 (2090.3-2474.79)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 Intel Core i5-1335U: Ø1179 (1105.64-1379.98)
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1547 (1472-2214.1)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU Intel Core i7-1355U: Ø884 (855.52-1252.31)
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U: Ø1965 (1946.38-2013.69)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø1855 (1830.91-1873.89)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø1746 (1507.22-1962.23)
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø1949 (1907.49-1999.5)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
82 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
80.6 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
79.4 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
75.4 pt
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
73.8 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
70.6 pt
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
68.1 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
57.8 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
56.7 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
15043 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (9769 - 19007, n=47)
14916 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
12929 Points -14%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
11829 Points -21%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
11739 (8847.85min - 11739.4max) Points -22%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1555 - 21812, n=61, last 2 years)
11706 Points -22%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
11676 Points -22%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
7747 Points -49%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
6936 Points -54%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1779 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
1747 Points -2%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
1740 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1496 - 1815, n=47)
1726 Points -3%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1721 Points -3%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
1705 Points -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (358 - 2001, n=61, last 2 years)
1669 Points -6%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1644 Points -8%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
1532 Points -14%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3798 - 7409, n=45)
5791 Points +12%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5169 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
4970 Points -4%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
4722 Points -9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (579 - 8541, n=57, last 2 years)
4548 Points -12%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
4506 Points -13%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
4469 Points -14%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
2972 Points -43%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
2899 Points -44%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
684 Points +1%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
678 Points
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
669 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (601 - 696, n=45)
665 Points -2%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
660 Points -3%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
658 Points -3%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
655 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (128 - 790, n=57, last 2 years)
636 Points -6%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
593 Points -13%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2475 (2090.3min - 2474.79max) Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1932 - 2880, n=51)
2445 Points -1%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
2214 (1472min - 2214.1max) Points -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
2014 (1946.38min - 2013.69max) Points -19%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (327 - 3345, n=63, last 2 years)
1987 Points -20%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1962 (1507.22min - 1962.23max) Points -21%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1874 (1830.91min - 1873.89max) Points -24%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
1380 Points -44%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
1252 (855.52min - 1252.31max) Points -49%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
273 Points +7%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
266 Points +4%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
264 Points +4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
255 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (99.6 - 268, n=47)
249 Points -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (72.4 - 307, n=58, last 2 years)
249 Points -2%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
244 Points -4%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
240 Points -6%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
236 Points -7%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
502 Seconds * -123%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
404 Seconds * -80%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (159 - 2271, n=61, last 2 years)
359 Seconds * -60%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
324 Seconds * -44%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
266 Seconds * -18%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
262 Seconds * -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
248 Seconds * -10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (175 - 381, n=43)
234 Seconds * -4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
225 Seconds *
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
59660 MIPS
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (41739 - 70254, n=45)
58973 MIPS -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
57056 MIPS -4%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
53198 MIPS -11%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
52555 MIPS -12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11775 - 77867, n=54, last 2 years)
48778 MIPS -18%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
42886 MIPS -28%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
34186 MIPS -43%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
30592 MIPS -49%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
6110 MIPS +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
5988 MIPS +16%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5782 MIPS +12%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
5513 MIPS +7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2669 - 6403, n=56, last 2 years)
5486 MIPS +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (4795 - 5621, n=45)
5343 MIPS +4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5156 MIPS
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
5093 MIPS -1%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
4651 MIPS -10%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (10017 - 13556, n=47)
12016 Points +2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
11781 Points
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
10450 Points -11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2557 - 14728, n=57, last 2 years)
10113 Points -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
9663 Points -18%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
9248 Points -22%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
7776 Points -34%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
7675 Points -35%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7399 Points -37%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
1881 Points +10%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1857 Points +8%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
1822 Points +6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (621 - 2350, n=57, last 2 years)
1783 Points +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1462 - 1824, n=47)
1753 Points +2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1714 Points
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1652 Points -4%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
1648 Points -4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
1647 Points -4%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (9.93 - 21.2, n=45)
16.4 fps +2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16.1 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
15.9 fps -1%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
15 fps -7%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
14.6 fps -9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.97 - 25.1, n=56, last 2 years)
13 fps -19%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
11.2 fps -30%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
9.2 fps -43%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
8.99 fps -44%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
57.4 s * -3%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
57.2 s * -3%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
55.7 s * -0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
55.5 s *
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.5 - 220, n=56, last 2 years)
54.7 s * +1%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
50.9 s * +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (40.9 - 79.2, n=44)
49 s * +12%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
48.1 s * +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
46.9 s * +15%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
0.583 sec * -20%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
0.524 sec * -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.413 - 1.456, n=56, last 2 years)
0.518 sec * -6%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4865 sec *
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (0.4457 - 0.53, n=44)
0.4819 sec * +1%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
0.4777 sec * +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
0.4676 sec * +4%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4651 sec * +4%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4559 sec * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
56242
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
9919
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
82102 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
13726 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
18324 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
17440
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
101.92 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
3.07 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
29.98 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
149.1 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2475 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
255 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
678 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5169 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15043 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1779 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
102.5 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
747 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
97.2 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
85 pt
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
84.4 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
78.7 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
78.3 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
69.8 pt
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
64.7 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
42 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
40.7 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
20130 KRay/s +48%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
18736 KRay/s +38%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
18678 KRay/s +38%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
13563 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (6670 - 18470, n=45)
13101 KRay/s -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1141 - 32888, n=56, last 2 years)
12858 KRay/s -5%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
9693 KRay/s -29%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
8619 KRay/s -36%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
6963 KRay/s -49%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5673 KRay/s -58%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
84324 Points +21%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
79716 Points +14%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
78607 Points +13%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
69767 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (40905 - 93181, n=45)
69488 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6838 - 123315, n=56, last 2 years)
61107 Points -12%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
50702 Points -27%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
32828 Points -53%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
29580 Points -58%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
3970 MB/s +22%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
3691 MB/s +13%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
3555 MB/s +9%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
3263 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1940 - 4436, n=45)
3244 MB/s -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (444 - 5287, n=56, last 2 years)
2891 MB/s -11%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2522 MB/s -23%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1687 MB/s -48%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1529 MB/s -53%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
95384 Points +12%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
93769 Points +10%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
91289 Points +8%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
84870 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (64698 - 94181, n=45)
83491 Points -2%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
82121 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11579 - 115682, n=56, last 2 years)
80395 Points -5%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
60719 Points -28%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
53839 Points -37%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
12858 Points +36%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
12286 Points +30%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
12132 Points +28%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
9475 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (5639 - 10647, n=45)
9119 Points -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (744 - 18418, n=56, last 2 years)
8218 Points -13%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
6679 Points -30%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4045 Points -57%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
3873 Points -59%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
44731 Points +28%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
41822 Points +20%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
41726 Points +19%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
34945 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (18236 - 47685, n=45)
33738 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (3366 - 65433, n=56, last 2 years)
31746 Points -9%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
24392 Points -30%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
16256 Points -53%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
14596 Points -58%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
142329 MB/s +107%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
92044 MB/s +34%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (45713 - 152179, n=45)
78240 MB/s +14%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
68795 MB/s
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
65903 MB/s -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (638 - 161430, n=56, last 2 years)
60483 MB/s -12%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
53018 MB/s -23%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
33466 MB/s -51%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
31432 MB/s -54%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
960 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (557 - 1250, n=45)
960 MB/s 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
858 MB/s -11%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
808 MB/s -16%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
807 MB/s -16%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
752 MB/s -22%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (166.9 - 1379, n=56, last 2 years)
745 MB/s -22%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
493 MB/s -49%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
454 MB/s -53%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
10555 KRay/s +50%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
9874 KRay/s +40%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
9738 KRay/s +38%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
7057 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3569 - 9802, n=45)
6848 KRay/s -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (610 - 17495, n=56, last 2 years)
6677 KRay/s -5%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5266 KRay/s -25%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
3482 KRay/s -51%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2991 KRay/s -58%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (32719 - 54223, n=45)
46541 MPixel/s +1%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
46137 MPixel/s
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
42905 MPixel/s -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6569 - 53954, n=56, last 2 years)
39998 MPixel/s -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
38442 MPixel/s -17%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
37141 MPixel/s -19%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
34266 MPixel/s -26%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
33689 MPixel/s -27%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
26903 MPixel/s -42%

系统性能

根据英特尔的说法,新的 Arc iGPU 是图形性能大幅提升的主要原因。只要我们看一下 PCMark 10 中的数字内容创建部分,这一点就很清楚了。在这方面,Swift Go 14 及其 Arc iGPU 的表现令人印象深刻。总体而言,宏碁 Swift Go 14 的系统性能远高于前代产品和大多数对比设备。这意味着我们面对的是一款强大的设备,即使面对 3D 应用程序也没有理由退缩。

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
6973 Points +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (5159 - 7529, n=32)
6732 Points +2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
6625 Points
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
6480 Points -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4993 - 7788, n=49, last 2 years)
6427 Points -3%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
5866 Points -11%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5781 Points -13%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5455 Points -18%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
5328 Points -20%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11359 Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
10803 Points +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (8580 - 11289, n=32)
10563 Points +3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (9476 - 11331, n=49, last 2 years)
10486 Points +3%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
10212 Points
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
10203 Points 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
10111 Points -1%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9781 Points -4%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
9068 Points -11%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
9933 Points +17%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9647 Points +13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (7822 - 10591, n=32)
8749 Points +3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6440 - 10623, n=49, last 2 years)
8627 Points +1%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
8500 Points
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
8386 Points -1%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
6966 Points -18%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6763 Points -20%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6572 Points -23%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
9090 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (4985 - 10709, n=32)
9011 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
8575 Points -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (5305 - 10983, n=49, last 2 years)
8048 Points -11%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7827 Points -14%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
7204 Points -21%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7027 Points -23%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6386 Points -30%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
5826 Points -36%
CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1669 Points +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1366 - 1903, n=32)
1655 Points +5%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
1579 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (365 - 1971, n=54, last 2 years)
1578 Points 0%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1543 Points -2%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1527 Points -3%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1523 Points -4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
1470 Points -7%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1256 Points -20%
CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1624 Points +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1291 - 1798, n=31)
1581 Points +5%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1551 Points +3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (364 - 1875, n=54, last 2 years)
1521 Points +1%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1513 Points 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
1510 Points
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1503 Points 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
1489 Points -1%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1326 Points -12%
CrossMark / Creativity
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1824 Points +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1519 - 1929, n=31)
1817 Points +5%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
1730 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (385 - 2210, n=54, last 2 years)
1729 Points 0%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1646 Points -5%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1603 Points -7%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1558 Points -10%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
1445 Points -16%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1251 Points -28%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1508 Points +10%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
1491 Points +9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (939 - 1802, n=31)
1396 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1389 Points +1%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
1372 Points
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1356 Points -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (312 - 1899, n=54, last 2 years)
1350 Points -2%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1231 Points -10%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1082 Points -21%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
317 Points +10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (156 - 448, n=56, last 2 years)
305 Points +6%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
293 Points +2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
287 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (252 - 299, n=32)
276 Points -4%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
275 Points -4%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
251 Points -13%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
244 Points -15%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
235 Points -18%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Average of class Subnotebook
  (132 - 325, n=54, last 2 years)
255 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (234 - 309, n=27)
254 Points
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
253 Points
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
231 Points
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
196.4 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
633 ms * -18%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
562 ms * -5%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
559 ms * -4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
559 ms * -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (517 - 614, n=33)
541 ms * -1%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
535 ms *
Average of class Subnotebook
  (363 - 1104, n=63, last 2 years)
529 ms * +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
526 ms * +2%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
516 ms * +4%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
514 ms * +4%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
6625 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (62397 - 96791, n=45)
83293 MB/s +3%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
80515 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (14916 - 108756, n=56, last 2 years)
70251 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (60544 - 90647, n=45)
79984 MB/s +11%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
72244 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (15948 - 122210, n=56, last 2 years)
67358 MB/s -7%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75291 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (16513 - 112837, n=56, last 2 years)
73251 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (58692 - 93451, n=45)
72558 MB/s -4%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
147.1 ns *
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (120.2 - 233, n=45)
144.2 ns * +2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (7.4 - 187.8, n=56, last 2 years)
107.2 ns * +27%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

在 Swift Go 14 中,SK Hynix 的新型 NVMe SSD 尽职尽责,在每个基准测试中都能达到平均到较高的传输速度。在对存储性能进行较长时间分析的 DiskSpd 循环中,读取速度略有下降。

SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
Sequential Read: 4224.68MB/s
Sequential Write: 3544.16MB/s
4K Read: 55.15MB/s
4K Write: 205.42MB/s
4K-64 Read: 1586.68MB/s
4K-64 Write: 2176.61MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.039ms
Access Time Write: 0.101ms
Score Read: 2064Points
Score Write: 3039Points
Score Total: 6129Points
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
88.9 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
77.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
75.1 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
71.6 pt
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
 
71.6 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
68.6 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl -11!
WDC PC SN810 1TB
67.3 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
62.7 pt
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
34.6 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3417 (3399.9min - 3416.77max) MB/s +48%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3265 (3244.93min - 3265.06max) MB/s +42%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.2 - 4501, n=56, last 2 years)
2937 MB/s +27%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2882 (2725.88min - 2882.22max) MB/s +25%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
2763 (2353.54min - 2762.92max) MB/s +20%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2700 (2683.01min - 2699.82max) MB/s +17%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
2305 (2283.64min - 2304.98max) MB/s
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
2305 MB/s 0%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
2154 (2143.71min - 2153.78max) MB/s -7%
seq write
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3465 (3398.98min - 3464.7max) MB/s +15%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3431 (3289.51min - 3431.36max) MB/s +14%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
3373 (2885.36min - 3372.81max) MB/s +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3233 (3089.31min - 3233.18max) MB/s +8%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
3001 (2954.22min - 3001.02max) MB/s
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
3001 MB/s 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.2 - 5344, n=56, last 2 years)
2942 MB/s -2%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2792 (2724.62min - 2792.15max) MB/s -7%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1524 (244.88min - 1523.68max) MB/s -49%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
7027 (5699.29min - 7026.72max) MB/s +121%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
WDC PC SN810 1TB
6948 (6424.99min - 6948.07max) MB/s +119%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6562 (5825.59min - 6561.57max) MB/s +106%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6508 (5678.88min - 6508.32max) MB/s +105%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.5 - 7155, n=56, last 2 years)
5088 MB/s +60%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
4714 (3899.2min - 4714.2max) MB/s +48%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
3179 (2816.5min - 3179.49max) MB/s
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
3179 MB/s 0%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
2553 (2224.87min - 2553.07max) MB/s -20%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5153 (5061.06min - 5153.12max) MB/s +37%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4947 (4921.79min - 4946.59max) MB/s +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4924 (4892.94min - 4924.33max) MB/s +31%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
4271 (4073.72min - 4270.7max) MB/s +14%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.2 - 6810, n=56, last 2 years)
3998 MB/s +7%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
3752 (3716.27min - 3752.48max) MB/s
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
3752 MB/s 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
3431 (3083.15min - 3431max) MB/s -9%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1698 (1529.75min - 1697.81max) MB/s -55%
4k q1 t1 read
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.6 (74.82min - 81.55max) MB/s +34%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
79.4 (78.48min - 79.38max) MB/s +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
70 (69.61min - 70max) MB/s +15%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
68.3 (67.74min - 68.25max) MB/s +12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8.27 - 87.4, n=56, last 2 years)
61.3 MB/s +1%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
60.9 (60.46min - 60.93max) MB/s
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
60.9 MB/s 0%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
WDC PC SN810 1TB
57.8 (56.71min - 57.8max) MB/s -5%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
43.5 (42.13min - 43.46max) MB/s -29%
4k q1 t1 write
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
273 (263.1min - 272.82max) MB/s +20%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
227 (221.95min - 227.04max) MB/s
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
227 MB/s 0%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
226 (219.95min - 225.84max) MB/s 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (12 - 360, n=56, last 2 years)
160.7 MB/s -29%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
154.6 (151.31min - 154.61max) MB/s -32%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
151 (149.72min - 151.04max) MB/s -33%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
113.9 (109.63min - 113.92max) MB/s -50%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
WDC PC SN810 1TB
100.6 (98.29min - 100.62max) MB/s -56%
4k q32 t16 read
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3881 (3853min - 3881.23max) MB/s +44%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
2700 (2252.61min - 2700.15max) MB/s
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
2700 MB/s 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
1945 (1930.8min - 1944.66max) MB/s -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1347 (1309.66min - 1347.08max) MB/s -50%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11.1 - 4286, n=56, last 2 years)
1291 MB/s -52%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1000 (938.41min - 999.95max) MB/s -63%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
666 (656.44min - 665.61max) MB/s -75%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
594 (466.98min - 594.27max) MB/s -78%
4k q32 t16 write
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3537 (3009.8min - 3536.52max) MB/s +101%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
2151 (1983.74min - 2151.37max) MB/s +22%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
1760 (1708.14min - 1759.52max) MB/s
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
1760 MB/s 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (14.2 - 4189, n=56, last 2 years)
891 MB/s -49%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
502 (495.8min - 501.89max) MB/s -71%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
WDC PC SN810 1TB
364 (331.19min - 364.14max) MB/s -79%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
344 (235.14min - 343.5max) MB/s -80%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
295 (241.31min - 294.53max) MB/s -83%
AS SSD
Score Total
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6136 Points 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
6129 Points
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
6129 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
5803 Points -5%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
5486 Points -10%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
4390 Points -28%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (515 - 8892, n=55, last 2 years)
4367 Points -29%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
2412 Points -61%
Score Read
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2943 Points +43%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
2064 Points
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
2064 Points 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
2056 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1712 Points -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (246 - 3307, n=55, last 2 years)
1382 Points -33%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1186 Points -43%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
842 Points -59%
Score Write
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3300 Points +9%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
3039 Points
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
3039 Points 0%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2690 Points -11%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
2413 Points -21%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (153 - 4469, n=55, last 2 years)
2335 Points -23%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1731 Points -43%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1161 Points -62%
Seq Read
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4943.25 MB/s +17%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
4778.49 MB/s +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4589.8 MB/s +9%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
4291.89 MB/s +2%
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
4225 MB/s 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
4224.68 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (448 - 5525, n=55, last 2 years)
3975 MB/s -6%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
2183.33 MB/s -48%
Seq Write
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3967.06 MB/s +12%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
3544.16 MB/s
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
3544 MB/s 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
3362.08 MB/s -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2622.82 MB/s -26%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (99 - 4961, n=55, last 2 years)
2598 MB/s -27%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2489.13 MB/s -30%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1602.26 MB/s -55%
4K Read
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
78.02 MB/s +41%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
71.67 MB/s +30%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
69.2 MB/s +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
64.68 MB/s +17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (19.8 - 96.2, n=55, last 2 years)
58.6 MB/s +6%
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
55.2 MB/s 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
55.15 MB/s
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
34.04 MB/s -38%
4K Write
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
235.83 MB/s +15%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
234.99 MB/s +14%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
205.42 MB/s
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
205 MB/s 0%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
196.81 MB/s -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (37.4 - 256, n=55, last 2 years)
177.4 MB/s -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
159.91 MB/s -22%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
90.74 MB/s -56%
4K-64 Read
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2370.92 MB/s +49%
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
1587 MB/s 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
1586.68 MB/s
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
1554.73 MB/s -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1188.59 MB/s -25%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (181.8 - 2682, n=55, last 2 years)
926 MB/s -42%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
639.2 MB/s -60%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
589.89 MB/s -63%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2878.08 MB/s +32%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2206.45 MB/s +1%
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
2177 MB/s 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
2176.61 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (105.9 - 3905, n=55, last 2 years)
1894 MB/s -13%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
1841.19 MB/s -15%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1137.26 MB/s -48%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
910.02 MB/s -58%
Access Time Read
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
0.151 ms * -287%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
0.09 ms * -131%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
0.058 ms * -49%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.02 - 0.167, n=55, last 2 years)
0.05771 ms * -48%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
0.039 ms *
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
0.039 ms * -0%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.036 ms * +8%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.028 ms * +28%
Access Time Write
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
0.101 ms *
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
0.101 ms * -0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.017 - 0.352, n=55, last 2 years)
0.07515 ms * +26%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
0.067 ms * +34%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
0.026 ms * +74%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.023 ms * +77%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
0.019 ms * +81%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.017 ms * +83%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3223 (2898.68-3275.12)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014: Ø4849 (4447.13-4884.48)
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6206 (5714.21-6585.65)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4259 (3371.17-6487.78)
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7003 (6443.82-7032.38)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB: Ø2546 (2208.3-2562.21)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl WDC PC SN810 1TB: Ø4588 (313.32-6954.37)

图形卡

据英特尔公司称,新款笔记本处理器的图形处理性能是第 13 代处理器的两倍。无论如何,我们的首次基准测试证实,八核 Arc iGPU 八核弧形 iGPU甚至令人信服地击败了 AMD Radeon 780M。英特尔专用笔记本图形处理器的不足之处 在我们的分析中.即使抛开 3D 性能不谈,宏碁 Swift Go 的 iGPU 性能也高得惊人。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
98.5 pt
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
 
95.1 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
85.9 pt
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
82.7 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl -1!
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
78.2 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
77.8 pt
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
60 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
55.6 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
46.4 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12866 Points
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (8064 - 13716, n=35)
11984 Points -7%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
11840 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
10862 Points -16%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
10671 Points -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (968 - 16296, n=53, last 2 years)
9600 Points -25%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
7098 Points -45%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
6355 Points -51%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
5449 Points -58%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
45874 Points +4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
43941 Points
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (31876 - 52200, n=22)
43407 Points -1%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
38676 Points -12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (5577 - 58319, n=29, last 2 years)
36827 Points -16%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
31618 Points -28%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
30249 Points -31%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
24783 Points -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
8971 Points
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (5568 - 9692, n=39)
8302 Points -7%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7410 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
7197 Points -20%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (832 - 11887, n=57, last 2 years)
6933 Points -23%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
6341 Points -29%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
5779 Points -36%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
5263 Points -41%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
4468 Points -50%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (2018 - 3770, n=42)
3231 Points +2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3172 Points
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2622 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
2551 Points -20%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (999 - 4501, n=58, last 2 years)
2547 Points -20%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2321 Points -27%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
1662 Points -48%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
1566 Points -51%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
1279 Points -60%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
43185 points
3DMark 11 Performance
13075 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
157591 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
29783 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
8314 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3471 points
Help
Blender - v3.3 Classroom CPU
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
946 Seconds * -138%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
737 Seconds * -86%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
607 Seconds * -53%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (241 - 1127, n=58, last 2 years)
558 Seconds * -41%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
503 Seconds * -27%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
434 Seconds * -9%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (294 - 692, n=38)
430 Seconds * -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
410 Seconds * -3%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
397 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

大幅改进的图形处理器 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H在游戏中,只要不过度追求画质设置或分辨率,就能给人留下深刻印象。在我们测试的大多数游戏中,中等或高画质的全高清游戏都能以超过 60fps 的速度运行。这意味着你可以不使用许多笔记本电脑中的 dGPU,如 GeForce RTX 2050Arc 530M.

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
92.6 pt
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
91.1 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
85.9 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
84.5 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
83 pt
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
67.4 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
54.3 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
54.1 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.3 (24min, 24P1) fps +13%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.1 (25min) fps +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
25.3 (20min) fps +9%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
23.3 (22min, 22P1) fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8.5 - 43.7, n=53, last 2 years)
21.8 fps -6%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
13.9 (13min, 13P1) fps -40%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
13.2 (12min, 12P1) fps -43%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
13.1 (6.5min, 7.63P0.1, 8.62P1) fps -44%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26 (3.2min, 16.4P1) fps +98%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
25.1 (2.96min, 17.2P1) fps +92%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
20.4 (1.148min, 12.8P1) fps +56%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (7.81 - 53, n=53, last 2 years)
19.3 fps +47%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
13.1 (2.12min, 9.35P1) fps
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
9.85 (1.911min, 5.46P1) fps -25%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
9.38 (3.42min, 6.02P1) fps -28%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
9.23 (4.42min, 5.41P1) fps -30%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.5 fps +46%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.4 fps +34%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.1 fps +32%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11.9 - 44.2, n=59, last 2 years)
23.2 fps +27%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
18.2 fps
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
17.2 fps -5%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
16.8 fps -8%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
15.1 fps -17%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
45.4 (33.1min, 36.3P1) fps +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
44.6 (14.6min, 22.9P1) fps +3%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43.4 (7.3min, 9.3P1) fps 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
43.2 (5.5min, 11.5P1) fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (17.7 - 70.7, n=59, last 2 years)
39.9 fps -8%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28.5 (5.7min, 7.83P1) fps -34%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
23.4 (5.4min, 6.24P1) fps -46%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
22.2 (5min, 6.24P1) fps -49%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
73.4 (47.4min) fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
67 (58.8min) fps -9%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
62.9 (53.2min) fps -14%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (13 - 99.5, n=61, last 2 years)
62.3 fps -15%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
62 (50.9min) fps -16%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
57 (50min) fps -22%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
56.5 (49.9min) fps -23%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
47.1 (38.4min) fps -36%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
37.95 fps +5%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
36.1 fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (20.7 - 97.1, n=55, last 2 years)
34 fps -6%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
29.1 fps -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.9 fps -23%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
25.4 fps -30%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
23 fps -36%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
21.4 fps -41%
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (92 - 160, n=25)
137.9 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
119.8 (102min) fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (48 - 187, n=48, last 2 years)
118 fps
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
117.3 (97min) fps
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
94 fps
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
79.8 (3.84min, 10.1P0.1, 36.8P1) fps
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
73.5 (46min, 52.56P1) fps
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
85.9 (74min) fps
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (59 - 100, n=23)
84.8 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
82 (74min) fps
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
75.3 (44min, 55.16P1) fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (33 - 118, n=36, last 2 years)
70.4 fps
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
63 fps
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
52.3 (7.14min, 25.6P0.1, 30.6P1) fps
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
50.8 (43min, 43P1) fps
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
37.2 (10min) fps
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (36 - 58, n=25)
48.3 fps
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
45 (40min) fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11.2 - 71, n=51, last 2 years)
41.2 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
40.7 (34min) fps
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
36 fps
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
34.9 (32min, 32P1) fps
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
28.1 (2.43min, 10.4P0.1, 16.1P1) fps
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28 (24min, 24P1) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.3 (24min, 24P1) fps +13%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.1 (25min) fps +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
25.3 (20min) fps +9%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (14.5 - 43.1, n=31)
23.7 fps +2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
23.3 (22min, 22P1) fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8.5 - 43.7, n=53, last 2 years)
21.8 fps -6%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
14.8 (13min, 14P1) fps -36%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
13.9 (13min, 13P1) fps -40%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
13.2 (12min, 12P1) fps -43%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
13.1 (6.5min, 7.63P0.1, 8.62P1) fps -44%

在超画质设置下查看《Witcher 3 》的帧速率,图形性能几乎翻了一番。Swift Go 14 的每秒帧数几乎是 Schenker Vision 14 的两倍。 申克 Vision 14.

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0510152025Tooltip
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core: Ø23.3 (22-26)
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø14.8 (13-16)
lowmed.highultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 124.1 120.8 34.8 13.1
The Witcher 3 (2015) 23.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 99.4 90.4 76 73.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 42.8 32.1 18.2 14
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 54.5 42.5 36.1
Far Cry 5 (2018) 35 33
Strange Brigade (2018) 141.9 60.6 52 43.2
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 33 28 () 26
Dying Light 2 (2022) 31.1 29.9
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) 25.7 19.3 15.6
F1 23 (2023) 64.6 59 35.9 12.2
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart (2023) 28.4 29 25.9 21.1
Starfield (2023) 11.5
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 22.8 20.6 19.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 34.1 29.6 24 13.1
EA Sports WRC (2023) 35.8 26.6 24.7 22.4

NPU 性能

英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H 内有一个神经处理单元。这部分处理器的任务是非常高效地处理人工智能应用。这意味着稳定扩散或语言模型等模型已经可以在该设备上运行。我们使用 UL Procyon AI 界面基准测试,让 GPU 与 NPU 正面交锋,同时检查功耗。在这两种情况下,我们很快就发现,在处理神经网络时,NPU 的性能仅略低于 Arc iGPU,但能耗却降低了近一半。这无疑让人工智能加速器在相同的应用中比图形芯片更高效。

因此,目前通过云计算运行的许多人工智能应用很快就可以在笔记本电脑上以节能的方式运行,而不需要互联网连接。

Power consumption UL Procyon Ai Inference benchmark on an external monitor

0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; UL Procyon AI GPU Integer Power Consumption - external Monitor: Ø32.9 (7.31-73.5)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; UL Procyon AI NPU Integer Power Consumption - external Monitor: Ø17.1 (6.15-71.5)
UL Procyon for Windows
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
Overall Score Integer NPU
493 Points ∼100%
Overall Score Integer GPU
541 Points ∼100%

英特尔慷慨地为我们提供了一个版本的 Gimp,其中已包含支持 OpenVINO 和 NPU 的稳定 Diffusion。经过冗长的设置后,文本到图像程序的运行速度出奇地快。到目前为止,我们还可以在 Arc 显卡上运行 Stable Diffusion。

诚然,并不是神经网络创建的每一幅图像都特别有用。稳定扩散技术只能有限地处理远距离观察的人脸、脚和手。但是,您为程序设定的任务也应尽可能明确。在这方面需要一些经验,以确保达到您的要求。

排放 - 基本保持安静

噪音排放

尽管性能很高,但新款宏碁 Swift Go 的声音并没有变大。满载情况下的噪音接近 45 dB(A),虽然称不上安静,但也还可以忍受。宏碁 Swift Go 处理中小型任务时通常不会听到风扇的声音。

Noise Level

Idle
25 / 25 / 26.2 dB(A)
Load
35.7 / 45.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.841.74040.4253332.13429.83131.227.828.532.24033.737.134.235.55032.132.532.634.56337.233.632.234.78030.22835.828.110024.519.828.523.112519.217.320.617.116018.116.718.117.520019.515.717.721.72501920.317.621.33152418.715.122.340023.816.21624.150024.316.615.225.963027.113.713.227.880034.415.211.535.6100038.418.211.239.1125034.917.110.836.2160034.814.611.2362000341411.435.6250034.414.212.135.2315034.713.61235.9400033.813.51235.7500033.614.41234.9630033.814.412.635.4800026.614.312.327.71000023.513.812.824.21250019.913.912.319.61600017.613.111.415.2SPL45.827.32547N4.60.80.65.1median 26.6median 14.6median 12.3median 27.7Delta7.41.42.57.643.844.841.436.139.53838.340.142.539.442.639.736.739.939.427.831.732.218.518.120.218.22021.917.218.620.420.517.618.623.918.922.416.413.719.213.912.12115.711.625.514.611.922.717.111.924.516.311.224.220.611.626.719.911.627.720.711.831.820.411.831.318.512.230.321.912.633.621.41333.41913.234.721.613.633.817.913.630.417.113.722.217.913.719.317.713.116.131.92543.21.40.53.8median 18.2median 13median 24.52.32.15.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAcer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
Noise
4%
5%
20%
14%
3%
6%
off / environment *
25
24.9
-0%
25.1
-0%
19.35
23%
23.1
8%
23
8%
23.4
6%
Idle Minimum *
25
24.9
-0%
25.1
-0%
20.57
18%
23.1
8%
24.7
1%
24.1
4%
Idle Average *
25
24.9
-0%
25.1
-0%
20.57
18%
23.1
8%
25.2
-1%
24.1
4%
Idle Maximum *
26.2
24.9
5%
26.1
-0%
20.57
21%
23.1
12%
25.2
4%
25.3
3%
Load Average *
35.7
31.9
11%
31.4
12%
32.18
10%
26.5
26%
32.1
10%
33.4
6%
Load Maximum *
45.5
43.2
5%
36.6
20%
32.26
29%
35.78
21%
47.1
-4%
39.4
13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
43.2
41.1
29.44
35.7
39.4

* ... smaller is better

温度

遗憾的是,我们在测试过程中测得的笔记本电脑表面温度依然很高。键盘后面的横杆甚至达到了 40 °C。然而,发热最严重的区域是屏幕,因为风扇排出的空气会直接吹向屏幕。 尽管如此,在上网或使用办公应用程序的正常操作情况下,笔记本电脑的表面温度仅略高于室温。

Max. Load
 34.2 °C36.5 °C27.5 °C 
 33.1 °C34.5 °C22.7 °C 
 26.2 °C22.5 °C22.7 °C 
Maximum: 36.5 °C
Average: 28.9 °C
25.3 °C49.5 °C45.2 °C
25.5 °C37.8 °C37.4 °C
22.5 °C27.2 °C30.1 °C
Maximum: 49.5 °C
Average: 33.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  45.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.5 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.2 °C / 79.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+2.1 °C / 3.7 F).
闲置顶部
闲置顶部
闲置底部
闲置底部
加载顶部
加载顶部
装载底部
装载底部
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
Heat
-2%
-22%
4%
3%
-30%
12%
Maximum Upper Side *
36.5
44.8
-23%
55
-51%
36.6
-0%
43.5
-19%
55
-51%
39
-7%
Maximum Bottom *
49.5
34.8
30%
55.4
-12%
37.2
25%
47.4
4%
53.2
-7%
35.8
28%
Idle Upper Side *
25.5
30.7
-20%
34.9
-37%
31.6
-24%
24.9
2%
37.1
-45%
25.2
1%
Idle Bottom *
35
32.5
7%
30
14%
30
14%
26
26%
40.1
-15%
25.6
27%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

如前所述,我们将处理器的提升性能设定在略低于宏碁设定值的水平。压力测试显示,酷睿至尊 7 的持续性能设置(PL1)有些过高。经过一段时间后,它的功耗从 45 瓦降至 43 瓦左右,但从长远来看,它仍能保持这一性能水平。

发言人

总的来说,宏碁 Swift Go 的扬声器音效不错。只是低音还可以再重一些。我们无法分辨出与前代产品的 前代产品.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.94037.92535.63429.63133.628.529.94038.834.240.8503732.635.46334.432.229.88027.735.82710021.128.521.512518.820.616.516032.418.123.22004717.736.425051.217.641.331555.415.144.340060165050068.115.258.163069.313.25980074.111.564.1100073.611.263.4125075.710.865.2160076.311.265.920007811.467.5250074.612.164.1315078.41268.34000771266.6500067.31256.9630069.512.659.3800063.612.353.31000061.312.8511250059.412.349.11600058.411.448SPL86.72576.3N62.50.633.4median 67.3median 12.3median 56.9Delta11.62.512.144.84239.536.940.137.642.640.739.938.131.728.518.1192018.918.62117.633.818.944.513.747.112.15411.665.811.966.511.967.211.267.211.671.911.674.511.875.411.869.412.270.812.6671368.113.262.713.66713.665.313.764.513.760.913.156.82582.10.548.2median 13median 65.82.18.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 流星湖可以实现经济效益

耗电量

据说英特尔新款 Meteor Lake 处理器的能效明显高于上一代产品。在我们的测试中,这一点并不十分明显,但这再次凸显了所安装软件的测试状态。在几乎所有的能耗测量中,都能明显看到较强的波动,这表明负载峰值较小。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 0.4 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.5 / 10.1 / 11.2 Watt
Load midlight 45.9 / 104.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14"
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB, OLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, WDC PC SN810 1TB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
9%
14%
38%
22%
15%
2%
18%
Idle Minimum *
5.5
5.5
-0%
6.7
-22%
3.3
40%
7.01
-27%
6
-9%
Idle Average *
10.1
7.2
29%
7.16
29%
5.6
45%
7.91
22%
6.5
36%
8.64 ?(4.2 - 16, n=37)
14%
Idle Maximum *
11.2
12.9
-15%
11.17
-0%
6.1
46%
12.3
-10%
13.9
-24%
12.1 ?(4.5 - 49, n=37)
-8%
Load Average *
45.9
55
-20%
46.5
-1%
40.1
13%
19.66
57%
41.9
9%
54.2 ?(31.3 - 76.2, n=36)
-18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
60.9
47
23%
37.2
39%
41.4
32%
38.2
37%
43.9
28%
Load Maximum *
104.1
63.6
39%
64.36
38%
51.8
50%
50
52%
50.8
51%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø60.9 (57.3-79.5)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø77.1 (51-104.1)

Power consumption with an external monitor

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø67.6 (61.8-103.4)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø40.9 (35.7-59.5)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø79.3 (68-83.8)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø50.4 (47.7-84)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø8.35 (6.24-16.6)

电池寿命

宏碁 Swift Go 14 配备了英特尔 Meteor Lake 处理器和 65 Wh 电池,但在 Wi-Fi 上网冲浪测试中,它只差一点就能达到 8 小时的标准。根据我们的能耗测量,上网时耗电量最大的是 OLED 面板。在黑暗模式下访问网站和运行应用程序应该会大大提高运行时间。上一代产品的运行时间可增加近 45 分钟。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
7h 59min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 14min
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 65 Wh
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 54.6 Wh
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 68 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, 52.5 Wh
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 37.5 Wh
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
-5%
57%
21%
44%
-21%
36%
54%
WiFi v1.3
479
453
-5%
716
49%
578
21%
729
52%
355
-26%
510
6%
Load
74
121
64%
100
35%
63
-15%
122
65%
H.264
720
185
Gaming
74
Reader / Idle
1011

Pros

+ 大幅改进的 iGPU
+ 高色彩范围的 OLED 屏幕
+ 轻便小巧
+ 免费的 m.2 NVMe 固态硬盘插槽
+ 适度安静
+ QHD 网络摄像头
+ 32 GB 内存

Cons

- 光面显示屏
- 读卡器速度慢
- 焊接内存

结论 - 不仅仅是办公室

宏碁 Swift Go 14 (2024) - 由宏碁提供
宏碁 Swift Go 14 (2024) - 由宏碁提供

在 Swift Go 14 上市之前,宏碁已经为我们准备了很多东西,这意味着并非所有东西都能完美运行。不过,我们已经有机会体验英特尔最新一代处理器,Meteor Lake 芯片的高级图形性能给我们留下了深刻印象。我们将在明年春季继续关注该设备的变化,然后对 Swift Go 14(2024)做出最终评判。不过,我们已经注意到,这款小巧的机器得益于功能更为强大的 Core Ultra 7.图形处理性能的提升使这款笔记本电脑及其出色的 OLED 显示屏的应用范围更加广泛。这至少使游戏和视频编辑成为可能。流星湖处理器中的 流星湖处理器在我们的测试中也展现了其强大的性能。

宏碁 Swift Go 14 重 1.3 千克,是一款轻巧的动力装置,在其优雅的机身内却蕴藏着巨大的能量。英特尔的 Meteor Lake 处理器确保了更广泛的应用案例。

毫无疑问,Swift Go 14 是一款移动设备。得益于 Thunderbolt 4、HDMI 2.1 和一些额外的端口,连接性并不缺乏。不久之后,华硕将推出搭载 Meteor Lake 处理器的其他替代产品,其 ZenBook 14 就采用了这种芯片组。没有耐心等待英特尔处理器笔记本电脑的用户,可以考虑一下采用 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U 的 14 英寸笔记本电脑,如HPPavilion Plus 14。.

价格和供应情况

Swift Go 14 预计将于 2024 年 2 月上市。到目前为止,德国地区的预计售价为不到 1,000 欧元。

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 宏碁 Swift Go 14 评测--Meteor Lake Core Ultra 7 的人工智能内核令人印象深刻
Marc Herter, 2023-12-18 (Update: 2023-12-18)