宏碁 Swift Go 14 评测--Meteor Lake Core Ultra 7 的人工智能内核令人印象深刻
距离我们评测宏碁 Swift Go 14 还不到两个月。那款产品给我们留下了深刻印象,性能出色,价格实惠。我们目前的评测设备配备了英特尔最新一代处理器。将于明年春季上市的宏碁 Swift Go 14 配备了 英特尔酷睿 155H.从硬件角度来看,宏碁为我们提供了一款基于标准规格设备的笔记本电脑。不过,到春季时,配套软件、性能管理和 BIOS 仍会有细微的改进。因此,在我们看到英特尔最新一代处理器为这款高端 OLED 显示屏机型带来哪些改进之前,我们不会对其进行评级。
在一些基准测试中,我们记录到的性能是搭载英特尔酷睿 i5-1335U 处理器的前代产品的两倍多。此外,英特尔的新 Arc iGPU 无疑会让许多游戏玩家感到高兴,因为英特尔的图形处理器现在至少可以与 Radeon RX 780M 相媲美。
英特尔本身经常将其新处理器与 AMD 的 Ryzen R7 7840U 进行比较,为此,我们将对同时配备英特尔和 AMD 处理器变体的惠普 Pavillon Plus 14 进行比较。Ayaneo Air 1S 可能是一个比较特别的代表,但这款设备也配备了 AMD 的强大竞争芯片。最后,LG Gram 2in1 和宏碁 Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 以及它们的第 13 代处理器为我们这组杰出的产品画上了圆满的句号。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
v (old) | 12 / 2023 | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
85.6 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 17.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.5 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 17.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
90.4 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.2 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 443.8 g | 21 mm | 5.50" | 1920x1080 | |
87.8 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18.8 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
外壳 - 角铝
尽管第一印象表明该设备没有发生任何变化,但我们仍然注意到宏碁对铝制外壳进行了细致的改进。棱角分明的边框设计没有暴露出任何制造缺陷,这意味着我们几乎可以复制粘贴前代产品的全部描述。不过,宏碁还是设法安装了一块更大的触摸板,从而明显改善了笔记本电脑的易用性。
功能 - 超强的无线网络连接和一流的网络摄像头
通过 HDMI 2.1 和两个 Thunderbolt 4 端口,这款小型笔记本电脑最多可连接三台显示器。当前的英特尔流星湖处理器支持同时向四台显示器输出。同样,宏碁甚至还设法安置了一个 microSD 读卡器,甚至还有一个迷你 Kensington Lock 插槽。
SD 读卡器
microSD 读卡器没有任何改进。它的读取速度慢至 28 MB/s,与去年的型号相当,仅适用于少量数据。我们的 AV Pro microSD 读卡器的速度要快 10 倍。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 |
交流
在使用 iPerf3 和华硕 GT-AXE11000 进行的 Wi-Fi 测试中,宏碁 Swift Go 在 5 GHz 和 6 GHz 网络中都表现出了相当高的传输速度。在家庭网络中,上传和下载速度高达 1.9 GBit/s。
网络摄像头
Acer Swift Go 的 QHD 网络摄像头带来了令人印象深刻的效果。得益于英特尔的 NPU 和 Windows Studio Effects,图像质量甚至还能再提高一些。不过,这需要对 iGPU 征税,正如你所预料的那样,宏碁 Swift Go 的风扇会迅速而响亮地发出声音。
安全
机上配备了指纹传感器、Kensington Lock 插槽和 TPM 2.0。这意味着所有与物理防盗和访问保护有关的基本安全要求都能得到满足。
维护
我们需要一把 TX5 螺丝刀和一个吸盘来打开宏碁 Swift Go。与 前代在笔记本电脑内部可以找到许多维护选项。两个 M.2 插槽(占用一个)和一个已安装的 Wi-Fi 模块可用。风扇可以轻松拆卸,以便清洁。只有大容量的 32 GB 内存是焊接的。顺便提一下,空闲的 M.2 插槽位于风扇旁边的带状电缆下面。
输入设备 - 大型触摸板
键盘
最重要的是,背光键的压力点可以再清晰一些。除此之外,这款键盘还能提供愉悦的键入体验。在黑暗环境中,按键背光可调节为两档。与前代产品类似,键盘上部的外壳也会有轻微的弯曲,这可能会让一些用户在用力按键时感到不适。
触摸板
在新版本中,宏碁大幅增加了 Swift Go 14 触摸板的尺寸,但四角的弧度依然保留。这一改变不仅有利于外观。在实际操作中,拖放和复制等许多操作都变得更加容易。现在的触摸板尺寸为 12 x 8 厘米,为输入和手势控制提供了更大的空间。
显示屏 - 2.8K、90Hz OLED 和 HDR500
采用流星湖处理器的宏碁 Swift Go 现在配备了亮度更高的 OLED 面板。在显示 HDR 内容时,它可以达到 400 cd/m²,甚至更高。深黑色和高对比度是此类显示技术的标准配置。亮度均匀,在 14 英寸(约 36 厘米)16:10 长宽比的 2.8K 分辨率下,肉眼几乎看不到单个像素。这一切都确保了我们能享受到无论是在户外还是在摄影棚灯光下都能大放异彩的出色画质。
Swift Go 的全新 AcerSense 应用程序提供了更多显示配置文件。不过,我们尚未观察到各种配置文件中的测量值有任何变化。正如开头提到的,宏碁仍在努力完善这款笔记本电脑的最终细节。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 385 cd/m²
Contrast: 9440:1 (Black: 0.0411 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.79
ΔE Greyscale 2.61 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.99% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.75% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.772
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 ATNA40YK11-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G LP160WQ1-SPB2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 MNE007JA1-1, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power Ayaneo-OLED, OLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -6% | -3% | -22% | 0% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.75 | 96.5 -3% | 97.9 -2% | 67.1 -33% | 99.85 0% | 99.8 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.99 | 99.9 0% | 99.6 0% | 97.8 -2% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.56 | 84.6 -14% | 92.1 -7% | 69.4 -30% | 99.71 1% | 95.8 -3% |
Response Times | -856% | -141% | -871% | -20% | 75% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.2 ? | 38.4 ? -1645% | 10.8 ? -391% | 38.4 ? -1645% | 4.4 ? -100% | 0.82 ? 63% |
Response Time Black / White * | 12.8 ? | 21.4 ? -67% | 9.29 ? 27% | 25.1 ? -96% | 5 ? 61% | 0.95 ? 93% |
PWM Frequency | 300 | 120 ? -60% | 240 ? -20% | 504.7 ? 68% | ||
Screen | -107% | 65% | -32% | -42% | 29% | |
Brightness middle | 388 | 329 -15% | 387 0% | 398 3% | 331 -15% | 384 -1% |
Brightness | 391 | 310 -21% | 387 -1% | 379 -3% | 339 -13% | 386 -1% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 88 -10% | 97 -1% | 90 -8% | 90 -8% | 98 0% |
Black Level * | 0.0411 | 0.39 -849% | 0.01 76% | 0.23 -460% | 0.07 -70% | |
Contrast | 9440 | 844 -91% | 38700 310% | 1730 -82% | 4729 -50% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.32 | 3.52 44% | 2.03 68% | 1.3 79% | 4.76 25% | 4.06 36% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.82 | 6.96 21% | 3.86 56% | 3.1 65% | 9.2 -4% | 6.73 24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.79 | 1.15 76% | 1.6 67% | 1.2 75% | 5.04 -5% | 0.49 90% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.61 | 5.75 -120% | 2.3 12% | 1.4 46% | 8.79 -237% | 1.1 58% |
Gamma | 1.772 124% | 2.137 103% | 2.23 99% | 2.26 97% | 2.155 102% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 6202 105% | 7584 86% | 6523 100% | 6448 101% | 7571 86% | 6331 103% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -323% /
-192% | -26% /
10% | -308% /
-149% | -21% /
-29% | 34% /
33% |
* ... smaller is better
出色的 OLED 几乎完全覆盖了所有三种色彩空间。只有 Adobe RGB 色彩空间还差 3%。
到目前为止,各种显示配置文件在测量色彩偏差方面没有任何改进,而目前的色彩偏差仍然很高。例如,在 Adobe RGB 色彩空间中,我们自己的 ICC 配置文件对色彩再现的改善很小。我们也可以认为,宏碁将在成品软件中对这方面进行改进。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.8 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 300 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 300 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 300 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
尽管宏碁 Swift Go 采用的是亮面显示屏,但由于亮度高,因此在户外环境中表现出色。视角分析也没有发现任何异常。
性能 - Meteor Lake 将 Swift Go 打造成小型游戏机
新款宏碁 Swift Go 14 配备了英特尔流星湖处理器。这是 英特尔酷睿 7 155H还配备了 弧形 iGPU八个内核和一个 NPU。此外,该设备还配备了 32 GB DDR5 内存和 SK Hynix 1 TB NVMe 固态硬盘。
测试条件
正如开头所提到的,我们所面对的宏碁 Swift Go 14 是一款符合标准规格硬件的设备。我们评测机器的软件和固件还不够完善。例如,在我们的 Swift Go 14 中,提升性能的数值最初配置得有些过高。在测试过程中,我们还遇到了预装的 AlterView 的问题,它可以创建视觉上诱人的 3D 背景。在与宏碁进行了热烈的交流后,我们决定删除该软件。借助 TechPowerUp 的 Throttle Stop,我们还将 PL2 降低到 55 瓦,同时将 PL1 保持在 45 瓦。这有助于笔记本电脑更好、更稳定地运行。在最终的性能管理方面,宏碁将进行更细致的微调。这样,笔记本电脑的性能应该会比现在更好。
处理器
英特尔的新处理器带来了一些期待已久的变化。采用 7 纳米制造工艺的芯片首次提供了 NPU 和新的 Arc iGPU。处理器 酷睿至尊 7 155H内含六个 P 核心、八个 E 核心和两个额外的 LP E 核心,据说特别节能。这意味着总共有 22 个线程可用。
与最相似的第 13 代处理器相比,英特尔最新一代处理器的性能优势并不明显。在这里,我们面对的是两台配备英特尔酷睿 i7-13700H 的设备。同样,它提供六个 P 核心和八个 E 核心。只有两个低功耗 E 核心缺失。与直接竞争对手AMD Ryzen 7 7840U 相比,英特尔的最新处理器通常表现不俗。近来(令人惊讶的是),在 Cinebench R23 的单核性能方面,红队现在遥遥领先。我们已经发布了对新一代处理器的详细分析。
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9769 - 19007, n=47) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=61, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1496 - 1815, n=47) | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=61, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3798 - 7409, n=45) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=57, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (601 - 696, n=45) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1932 - 2880, n=51) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=63, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (99.6 - 268, n=47) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=58, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=61, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (175 - 381, n=43) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (41739 - 70254, n=45) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=54, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (4795 - 5621, n=45) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10017 - 13556, n=47) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1462 - 1824, n=47) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9.93 - 21.2, n=45) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=56, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=56, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40.9 - 79.2, n=44) | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.4457 - 0.53, n=44) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=45) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=56, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=45) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=56, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=45) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=56, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=45) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=56, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=45) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=56, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=45) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=56, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=45) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=56, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=45) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=45) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=56, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=45) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 53954, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power |
系统性能
根据英特尔的说法,新的 Arc iGPU 是图形性能大幅提升的主要原因。只要我们看一下 PCMark 10 中的数字内容创建部分,这一点就很清楚了。在这方面,Swift Go 14 及其 Arc iGPU 的表现令人印象深刻。总体而言,宏碁 Swift Go 14 的系统性能远高于前代产品和大多数对比设备。这意味着我们面对的是一款强大的设备,即使面对 3D 应用程序也没有理由退缩。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5159 - 7529, n=32) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8580 - 11289, n=32) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (7822 - 10591, n=32) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (4985 - 10709, n=32) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=49, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=32) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=54, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1291 - 1798, n=31) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=54, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=31) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=54, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (939 - 1802, n=31) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=54, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=56, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (252 - 299, n=32) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (234 - 309, n=27) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (517 - 614, n=33) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6625 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=45) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=56, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=45) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=56, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 112837, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=45) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (120.2 - 233, n=45) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=56, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
在 Swift Go 14 中,SK Hynix 的新型 NVMe SSD 尽职尽责,在每个基准测试中都能达到平均到较高的传输速度。在对存储性能进行较长时间分析的 DiskSpd 循环中,读取速度略有下降。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
3DMark 06 Standard Score | points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 43185 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 13075 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 157591 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 29783 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8314 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3471 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
大幅改进的图形处理器 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H在游戏中,只要不过度追求画质设置或分辨率,就能给人留下深刻印象。在我们测试的大多数游戏中,中等或高画质的全高清游戏都能以超过 60fps 的速度运行。这意味着你可以不使用许多笔记本电脑中的 dGPU,如 GeForce RTX 2050或 Arc 530M.
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8.5 - 43.7, n=53, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
在超画质设置下查看《Witcher 3 》的帧速率,图形性能几乎翻了一番。Swift Go 14 的每秒帧数几乎是 Schenker Vision 14 的两倍。 申克 Vision 14.
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 124.1 | 120.8 | 34.8 | 13.1 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 23.3 | ||||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 99.4 | 90.4 | 76 | 73.4 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 42.8 | 32.1 | 18.2 | 14 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 54.5 | 42.5 | 36.1 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 35 | 33 | |||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 141.9 | 60.6 | 52 | 43.2 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 33 | 28 () | 26 | ||
Dying Light 2 (2022) | 31.1 | 29.9 | |||
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) | 25.7 | 19.3 | 15.6 | ||
F1 23 (2023) | 64.6 | 59 | 35.9 | 12.2 | |
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart (2023) | 28.4 | 29 | 25.9 | 21.1 | |
Starfield (2023) | 11.5 | ||||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 22.8 | 20.6 | 19.1 | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 34.1 | 29.6 | 24 | 13.1 | |
EA Sports WRC (2023) | 35.8 | 26.6 | 24.7 | 22.4 |
NPU 性能
英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H 内有一个神经处理单元。这部分处理器的任务是非常高效地处理人工智能应用。这意味着稳定扩散或语言模型等模型已经可以在该设备上运行。我们使用 UL Procyon AI 界面基准测试,让 GPU 与 NPU 正面交锋,同时检查功耗。在这两种情况下,我们很快就发现,在处理神经网络时,NPU 的性能仅略低于 Arc iGPU,但能耗却降低了近一半。这无疑让人工智能加速器在相同的应用中比图形芯片更高效。
因此,目前通过云计算运行的许多人工智能应用很快就可以在笔记本电脑上以节能的方式运行,而不需要互联网连接。
Power consumption UL Procyon Ai Inference benchmark on an external monitor
UL Procyon for Windows | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Overall Score Integer NPU | |
Overall Score Integer GPU | |
英特尔慷慨地为我们提供了一个版本的 Gimp,其中已包含支持 OpenVINO 和 NPU 的稳定 Diffusion。经过冗长的设置后,文本到图像程序的运行速度出奇地快。到目前为止,我们还可以在 Arc 显卡上运行 Stable Diffusion。
诚然,并不是神经网络创建的每一幅图像都特别有用。稳定扩散技术只能有限地处理远距离观察的人脸、脚和手。但是,您为程序设定的任务也应尽可能明确。在这方面需要一些经验,以确保达到您的要求。
排放 - 基本保持安静
噪音排放
尽管性能很高,但新款宏碁 Swift Go 的声音并没有变大。满载情况下的噪音接近 45 dB(A),虽然称不上安静,但也还可以忍受。宏碁 Swift Go 处理中小型任务时通常不会听到风扇的声音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25 / 25 / 26.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 35.7 / 45.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014 | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU | Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 4% | 5% | 20% | 14% | 3% | 6% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 24.9 -0% | 25.1 -0% | 19.35 23% | 23.1 8% | 23 8% | 23.4 6% |
Idle Minimum * | 25 | 24.9 -0% | 25.1 -0% | 20.57 18% | 23.1 8% | 24.7 1% | 24.1 4% |
Idle Average * | 25 | 24.9 -0% | 25.1 -0% | 20.57 18% | 23.1 8% | 25.2 -1% | 24.1 4% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.2 | 24.9 5% | 26.1 -0% | 20.57 21% | 23.1 12% | 25.2 4% | 25.3 3% |
Load Average * | 35.7 | 31.9 11% | 31.4 12% | 32.18 10% | 26.5 26% | 32.1 10% | 33.4 6% |
Load Maximum * | 45.5 | 43.2 5% | 36.6 20% | 32.26 29% | 35.78 21% | 47.1 -4% | 39.4 13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.2 | 41.1 | 29.44 | 35.7 | 39.4 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
遗憾的是,我们在测试过程中测得的笔记本电脑表面温度依然很高。键盘后面的横杆甚至达到了 40 °C。然而,发热最严重的区域是屏幕,因为风扇排出的空气会直接吹向屏幕。 尽管如此,在上网或使用办公应用程序的正常操作情况下,笔记本电脑的表面温度仅略高于室温。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.5 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.2 °C / 79.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+2.1 °C / 3.7 F).
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -2% | -22% | 4% | 3% | -30% | 12% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 36.5 | 44.8 -23% | 55 -51% | 36.6 -0% | 43.5 -19% | 55 -51% | 39 -7% |
Maximum Bottom * | 49.5 | 34.8 30% | 55.4 -12% | 37.2 25% | 47.4 4% | 53.2 -7% | 35.8 28% |
Idle Upper Side * | 25.5 | 30.7 -20% | 34.9 -37% | 31.6 -24% | 24.9 2% | 37.1 -45% | 25.2 1% |
Idle Bottom * | 35 | 32.5 7% | 30 14% | 30 14% | 26 26% | 40.1 -15% | 25.6 27% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
如前所述,我们将处理器的提升性能设定在略低于宏碁设定值的水平。压力测试显示,酷睿至尊 7 的持续性能设置(PL1)有些过高。经过一段时间后,它的功耗从 45 瓦降至 43 瓦左右,但从长远来看,它仍能保持这一性能水平。
发言人
总的来说,宏碁 Swift Go 的扬声器音效不错。只是低音还可以再重一些。我们无法分辨出与前代产品的 前代产品.
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 流星湖可以实现经济效益
耗电量
据说英特尔新款 Meteor Lake 处理器的能效明显高于上一代产品。在我们的测试中,这一点并不十分明显,但这再次凸显了所安装软件的测试状态。在几乎所有的能耗测量中,都能明显看到较强的波动,这表明负载峰值较小。
Off / Standby | 0.4 / 0.4 Watt |
Idle | 5.5 / 10.1 / 11.2 Watt |
Load |
45.9 / 104.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB, OLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, WDC PC SN810 1TB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 9% | 14% | 38% | 22% | 15% | 2% | 18% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.5 | 5.5 -0% | 6.7 -22% | 3.3 40% | 7.01 -27% | 6 -9% | 5.41 ? 2% | 4.49 ? 18% |
Idle Average * | 10.1 | 7.2 29% | 7.16 29% | 5.6 45% | 7.91 22% | 6.5 36% | 8.64 ? 14% | 7.66 ? 24% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.2 | 12.9 -15% | 11.17 -0% | 6.1 46% | 12.3 -10% | 13.9 -24% | 12.1 ? -8% | 9.56 ? 15% |
Load Average * | 45.9 | 55 -20% | 46.5 -1% | 40.1 13% | 19.66 57% | 41.9 9% | 54.2 ? -18% | 46.6 ? -2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 60.9 | 47 23% | 37.2 39% | 41.4 32% | 38.2 37% | 43.9 28% | ||
Load Maximum * | 104.1 | 63.6 39% | 64.36 38% | 51.8 50% | 50 52% | 50.8 51% | 85 ? 18% | 68.6 ? 34% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
宏碁 Swift Go 14 配备了英特尔 Meteor Lake 处理器和 65 Wh 电池,但在 Wi-Fi 上网冲浪测试中,它只差一点就能达到 8 小时的标准。根据我们的能耗测量,上网时耗电量最大的是 OLED 面板。在黑暗模式下访问网站和运行应用程序应该会大大提高运行时间。上一代产品的运行时间可增加近 45 分钟。
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 65 Wh | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 54.6 Wh | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 68 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, 52.5 Wh | Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 37.5 Wh | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -5% | 57% | 21% | 44% | -21% | 36% | 54% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 479 | 453 -5% | 716 49% | 578 21% | 729 52% | 355 -26% | 510 6% | 719 ? 50% |
Load | 74 | 121 64% | 100 35% | 63 -15% | 122 65% | 116.6 ? 58% | ||
H.264 | 720 | 185 | 896 ? | |||||
Gaming | 74 | 85 ? | ||||||
Reader / Idle | 1011 | 1750 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 不仅仅是办公室
在 Swift Go 14 上市之前,宏碁已经为我们准备了很多东西,这意味着并非所有东西都能完美运行。不过,我们已经有机会体验英特尔最新一代处理器,Meteor Lake 芯片的高级图形性能给我们留下了深刻印象。我们将在明年春季继续关注该设备的变化,然后对 Swift Go 14(2024)做出最终评判。不过,我们已经注意到,这款小巧的机器得益于功能更为强大的 Core Ultra 7.图形处理性能的提升使这款笔记本电脑及其出色的 OLED 显示屏的应用范围更加广泛。这至少使游戏和视频编辑成为可能。流星湖处理器中的 流星湖处理器在我们的测试中也展现了其强大的性能。
宏碁 Swift Go 14 重 1.3 千克,是一款轻巧的动力装置,在其优雅的机身内却蕴藏着巨大的能量。英特尔的 Meteor Lake 处理器确保了更广泛的应用案例。
毫无疑问,Swift Go 14 是一款移动设备。得益于 Thunderbolt 4、HDMI 2.1 和一些额外的端口,连接性并不缺乏。不久之后,华硕将推出搭载 Meteor Lake 处理器的其他替代产品,其 ZenBook 14 就采用了这种芯片组。没有耐心等待英特尔处理器笔记本电脑的用户,可以考虑一下采用 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U 的 14 英寸笔记本电脑,如HPPavilion Plus 14。.
价格和供应情况
Swift Go 14 预计将于 2024 年 2 月上市。到目前为止,德国地区的预计售价为不到 1,000 欧元。
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.