Medion S20 笔记本电脑评测:配备 Intel Core Ultra 7 处理器的 17 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑
Medion 推出的 S20 是一款功能强大的 17.3 英寸笔记本电脑,采用 IPS 显示屏,分辨率为 1920 x 1080 像素。该机型配备了 英特尔酷睿 7 155H提供 16 个内核和 22 个线程,还配备了 英特尔弧.竞争机型包括 联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 G9和 三星Galaxy Book4 Edge 16、小米 小米红米笔记本 Pro 16 2024,三星 三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 16,LG LG Gram 17和 SCHENKER XMG Evo 15.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
77 % | v8 | 08 / 2024 | Medion S17431-MD62640 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 2.1 kg | 20 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
87.9 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.9 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
80.2 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 1.5 kg | 12.3 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.9 kg | 15.9 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 | |
88.9 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.5 kg | 12.5 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
84.7 % | v8 | 08 / 2024 | SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.30" | 2560x1600 | |
87 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 18.1 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击 这里.
外壳和功能 - 铝镁合金外壳,无 USB 4 接口
Medion S20 的外壳由铝和镁混合制成,结构坚固,重量相对较轻。它的重量为 2.1 千克,尺寸为 39.6 x 25.3 x 2.5 厘米,尽管采用了 17.3 英寸显示屏,但仍相对便携。整体做工扎实,给人留下了高品质的印象。最大开启角度略低于 160 度,铰链坚固且安静。不过,无法实现单手开启。
共有 5 个 USB 端口:3 个 USB-A 端口和 2 个 USB-C 端口。但遗憾的是,这些接口仅为 USB 3.2 Gen 1,这意味着无法使用数据传输率更高的 USB 4 或 Thunderbolt 4。USB-C 端口至少提供 DP Alt-Mode 和 Power Delivery 功能。因此,该笔记本电脑总共可连接三台外接显示器(1x HDMI、2x DP)。
无线连接由 WiFi 6E 芯片(英特尔 AX211)提供,该芯片可实现全面稳定的连接。集成网络摄像头的像素为 210 万像素,你不应该指望它能带来什么奇迹。不过,值得一提的是,网络摄像头有一个专门的开关。尽管机身超大,但却没有 SD 读卡器或以太网连接。
可持续性
遗憾的是,笔记本电脑的包装材料主要由塑料制成。电源装置和笔记本电脑都用塑料包装,尽管笔记本电脑是用大气泡膜包装的。Medion S20 笔记本电脑可以进行升级和维修。底板仅用 12 颗螺丝固定。注意:总共使用了三种不同长度的螺丝。由于预装了 Windows 11 Home 操作系统,因此可保证在未来几年内进行软件更新。
输入设备 - 发光按键、全尺寸键盘和大尺寸触控板
Medion S20 笔记本电脑的外壳很大,可容纳一个带四列数字键盘的全尺寸键盘。键盘采用 Chiclet 键盘样式,打字手感非常好,不过按压点可以稍软一些。我们的机型上的 1 键也有问题,经常没有反应。得益于坚固的铝镁合金外壳,键盘在键入时不会出现松动。我们还喜欢全尺寸的方向键和回车键。
带有玻璃表面的触控板非常大(约 14 x 9.7 厘米),但仍有垂直操作的空间。触控板的问题在于,只有下部三分之一的位置可以真正点击,即便如此也要用非常大的力气。
显示屏 - 17.3 英寸 IPS 显示屏,具有弱点
17.3 英寸屏幕的分辨率为 1,920 x 1,080 像素,像素密度相对较低。与竞争对手的机型相比,如 联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 G9 或 三星Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Medion S20 的大显示屏分辨率最低。IPS 显示屏的色彩覆盖率也不是特别好,因此这款笔记本肯定不适合专业图像编辑。不过,372 尼特的亮度相当稳定,再加上磨砂涂层,Medion S20 笔记本在户外使用也没有任何问题。
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 372 cd/m²
Contrast: 979:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.34 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.66
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
66.35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.89% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.17% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.33
Medion S17431-MD62640 BOE08D3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 NE160QDM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 TL160MDMP03_0, IPS, 3072x1920, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) NE153QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3" | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G LG Display LP170WQ1-SPF2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -0% | 36% | 32% | 36% | 11% | 28% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 65.17 | 63.3 -3% | 99.5 53% | 98.8 52% | 99.5 53% | 73.6 13% | 96.3 48% |
sRGB Coverage | 91.89 | 95.2 4% | 100 9% | 100 9% | 100 9% | 100 9% | 99.7 8% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.35 | 65.3 -2% | 97.5 47% | 89.9 35% | 97.5 47% | 74.2 12% | 85.1 28% |
Response Times | 42% | 97% | -16% | 97% | 73% | -19% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 26.8 ? | 15 ? 44% | 0.64 ? 98% | 39.2 ? -46% | 0.64 ? 98% | 4.6 ? 83% | 25 ? 7% |
Response Time Black / White * | 17.2 ? | 10.3 ? 40% | 0.68 ? 96% | 14.6 ? 15% | 0.68 ? 96% | 6.6 ? 62% | 25 ? -45% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 240 ? | |||||
Screen | 12% | 39% | 22% | 39% | 23% | -10% | |
Brightness middle | 372 | 368 -1% | 385 3% | 520 40% | 385 3% | 608 63% | 420 13% |
Brightness | 341 | 368 8% | 391 15% | 510 50% | 391 15% | 585 72% | 387 13% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 91 5% | 97 11% | 93 7% | 97 11% | 93 7% | 88 1% |
Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.31 18% | 0.35 8% | 0.61 -61% | 0.34 11% | ||
Contrast | 979 | 1187 21% | 1486 52% | 997 2% | 1235 26% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.34 | 2.4 28% | 1.1 67% | 2.9 13% | 1.1 67% | 2.1 37% | 4.32 -29% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.69 | 6.5 3% | 1.8 73% | 6.2 7% | 1.8 73% | 4.3 36% | 8.55 -28% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.66 | 0.8 52% | 1.1 34% | 1.2 28% | 1.27 23% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 4.5 -22% | 1.4 62% | 4.3 -16% | 1.4 62% | 2.7 27% | 8.04 -117% |
Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.21 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.19 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.2 100% | 2.224 99% |
CCT | 6816 95% | 6324 103% | 6444 101% | 7422 88% | 6444 101% | 6168 105% | 8114 80% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 18% /
14% | 57% /
49% | 13% /
19% | 57% /
49% | 36% /
28% | -0% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
只有 sRGB 色彩空间的覆盖率还算不错,但即使在这一领域,所有选定的竞争对手的表现都要好得多。我们批评的是,Medion 通过外壳上的贴纸宣传完全覆盖 sRGB 空间,但我们只能测量到 92% 的覆盖率。虽然 DeltaE 值的偏差更大,但经过校准后,灰度和色彩的偏差限制均小于 2。校准后的曲线可在文章顶部免费下载。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise | |
↘ 8.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.8 ms rise | |
↘ 15 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - Intel Core Ultra 性能低于平均水平
测试显示了 英特尔酷睿 7 155H的一些弱点。两台 IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9, 小米红米笔记本 Pro 16, 三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 16, LG Gram 17和 申克 XMG Evo 15使用相同的处理器,但在大多数基准测试中表现略胜一筹。不建议对性能有特别高要求的用户使用这款笔记本电脑。不过,如果你只想浏览互联网、办公或玩要求不高的游戏,Medion S20 绝对是你的不二之选。
测试条件
只有标准的 Windows 配置文件可用于性能设置。制造商提供的其他性能配置文件不可用。因此,用户无法调整 TDP。在 PL1 中为 45 瓦,在 PL2 中为 60 瓦。在 Windows 设置下的性能模式中,风扇也会在正常办公活动中打开,因此建议使用 "平衡 "设置。
最佳性能 | 平衡 | 最佳节能 | |
---|---|---|---|
功率限制 1 (HWInfo) | 45 瓦 | 45 瓦 | 45 瓦 |
功率极限 2 (HWInfo) | 60 瓦 | 60 瓦 | 60 瓦 |
处理器
安装的 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H提供 16 个 CPU 内核,共有 22 个线程。连续多线程负载测试表明,该处理器的性能保持稳定,长时间运行后也未发现性能下降。所有基准测试的结果表明,该处理器的性能仅略低于 Core Ultra 7 155H 的平均水平。不过,考虑到 Medion 笔记本电脑的尺寸,有可能有更大的空间对处理器进行更好的散热,这可能允许更高的功率限制,从而提高性能。
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Office | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 -2! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9769 - 19007, n=48) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=96, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1496 - 1815, n=48) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3798 - 7409, n=46) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (601 - 696, n=46) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1932 - 2880, n=52) | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=97, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (99.6 - 268, n=48) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=96, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (175 - 381, n=44) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (41739 - 70254, n=46) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=97, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (4795 - 5621, n=46) | |
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (7732 - 13656, n=51) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Average of class Office (662 - 14767, n=62, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1901 - 2473, n=48) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Office (457 - 2769, n=61, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10017 - 13556, n=48) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=96, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1462 - 1824, n=48) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Office (510 - 1995, n=97, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9.93 - 21.2, n=46) | |
Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=95, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (37.5 - 79.2, n=45) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=94, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.4457 - 0.53, n=45) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average of class Office | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=46) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=96, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=46) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=96, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=46) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=96, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=46) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=46) | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=46) | |
Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=96, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=46) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Average of class Office (7860 - 155900, n=96, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=46) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=96, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=46) | |
Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=96, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=46) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=96, last 2 years) |
系统性能
在日常使用中,使用传统的办公、互联网和多媒体应用程序时,我们没有发现该笔记本有任何问题。不过,系统基准测试表明,该机型的性能始终比 Ultra 7 155H 的竞争机型差。性能下降的部分原因是某些竞争机型的功耗限制较高,部分原因是许多竞争机型提供了更快的内存。不过,正如前面提到的,该机型完全可以胜任多媒体设备的角色,而且考虑到其尺寸和明显低于竞争对手的价格,我们认为其性能已经足够。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5159 - 7529, n=32) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=88, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8580 - 11289, n=32) | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (7822 - 10591, n=32) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=88, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (4985 - 10709, n=32) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Average of class Office (2126 - 9773, n=88, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
CrossMark / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=32) | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1291 - 1798, n=31) | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=31) | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=90, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (939 - 1802, n=31) | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (252 - 299, n=32) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=88, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (234 - 309, n=27) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=88, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Office (404 - 1966, n=95, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (517 - 614, n=33) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6214 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=46) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=97, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=46) | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=97, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=46) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (116.2 - 233, n=46) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Average of class Office (6.9 - 185.2, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
我们对 DPC 延迟的测试发现了一些问题,这意味着该设备无法进行实时视频和音频编辑。不过,在日常使用或播放 4K 分辨率的 YouTube 视频时,我们没有发现任何问题。未来的软件更新可能会改善 DPC 延迟。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
Phison 的 PCIe 4 固态硬盘(M.2-2280,1 TB)具有稳定的传输速率,但性能通常不如同类产品。Medion S20 笔记本拥有一个额外的全尺寸 M.2 SSD 插槽,这一点非常实用。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
与竞争对手相比,Medion S20 在图形性能方面也不得不做出让步。英特尔 Arc 8 iGPU在这方面的潜力远远不够。看看时钟频率也就知道原因何在了。英特尔弧形 iGPU 的主频最高可达 2.25 GHz。但在 Medion S20 笔记本电脑中,图形芯片的最高频率仅为 1.45 GHz。在我们的赛博朋克基准测试中,平均时钟频率仅为 1.05 GHz。此外,竞争对手机型通常更快的内存也确保了更好的结果。
在节流设置下,一些游戏可以以稳定的帧速率运行,但这款机型并不适合游戏。由于没有 USB 4 和 Thunderbolt 4,外置图形解决方案也无法实现。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 -1! | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 -1! | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) -1! | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 -1! | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G -1! | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 -1! | |
Average of class Office |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 34184 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 9281 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 25589 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5820 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2973 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Office (3.35 - 47.8, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Office (2.56 - 30.7, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Medion S17431-MD62640 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 136.9 | 111 | 24.3 | 10.3 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 91.5 | 82.3 | 63.2 | 60.3 | 30.9 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 45.2 | 33 | 18.4 | 12.6 | 7.7 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 54.9 | 40.4 | 34.6 | 34.4 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 121 | 54 | 40 | 33.4 | 25 | 15 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 23 | 20.6 | 16.5 | 14.2 | 14 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 16.7 | 15.2 | 14.3 | 13.5 |
排放与能源 - 大型笔记本电脑运行温度高
噪音排放
在负载情况下,Medion S20 笔记本电脑的风扇转速很高,但仍保持在 43 dB(A) 以下的极限值。联想联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 G9的噪音更大。遗憾的是,这款笔记本即使在空闲时也不会完全安静,因为风扇总是在最低限度运转。不过,在 28 分贝(A)的范围内,我们并不觉得这是令人不安的,而且在大多数日常应用场景中也不会引起注意。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 28.51 / 28.51 / 28.51 dB(A) |
Load |
| / 42.76 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
Medion S17431-MD62640 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU | SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 4% | 14% | 9% | 7% | 5% | 10% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 24.1 -5% | 24.6 -7% | 24.4 -6% | 24.6 -7% | 24.7 -7% | 24.95 -8% |
Idle Minimum * | 28.51 | 24.1 15% | 24.6 14% | 24.4 14% | 24.6 14% | 24.7 13% | 24.95 12% |
Idle Average * | 28.51 | 24.1 15% | 24.6 14% | 24.4 14% | 24.6 14% | 24.7 13% | 24.95 12% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.51 | 28.2 1% | 24.6 14% | 24.4 14% | 26.4 7% | 28.9 -1% | 25.3 11% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 42.76 | 32.4 24% | 40.4 6% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 42.76 | 44.4 -4% | 32.4 24% | 39.7 7% | 40 6% | 40.4 6% | 32 25% |
Load Average * | 44.4 | 28.1 | 32 | 40 | 32.7 | 38.54 | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.5 | 30.6 | 40 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Medion S20 笔记本电脑在极端负荷下会出现问题。在键盘中部的上侧,该机型的温度高达 51 °C,这已经让人感到厌烦。但在手掌区域,温度明显降低,为 30 至 33 °C,属于正常范围。与竞争对手相比,Medion S20 的运行温度相对较高。三星 三星Galaxy Book3 Edge 16和 申克 XMG Evo 15 在负载情况下底部温度更高。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-6.3 °C / -11.3 F).
Medion S17431-MD62640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 23% | 12% | 15% | 20% | 5% | 14% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 51 | 36.3 29% | 44.3 13% | 40.3 21% | 40.9 20% | 41.7 18% | 40.1 21% |
Maximum Bottom * | 48 | 39.1 19% | 51.6 -8% | 45.9 4% | 42.6 11% | 49.6 -3% | 42.9 11% |
Idle Upper Side * | 31 | 24.9 20% | 25.1 19% | 26.3 15% | 24.5 21% | 31.1 -0% | 26.8 14% |
Idle Bottom * | 34 | 26.1 23% | 25.8 24% | 27.9 18% | 24.8 27% | 33.1 3% | 31.1 9% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
内置立体声扬声器可提供可接受的音效,但没有低音。扬声器通常足以满足电话会议、视频和电影的需要。不过,建议发烧友使用外置解决方案。
Medion S17431-MD62640 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.37 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
Medion S20 笔记本电脑在闲置时需要相对较高的能耗。压力测试表明,所提供的 90 瓦电源足以满足 83 瓦的最大需求。
Off / Standby | 0.4 / 1 Watt |
Idle | 10.3 / 11.2 / 11.7 Watt |
Load |
/ 83 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Power consumtion Cyberpunk / Stress test
Power consumtion with the external monitor
电池寿命
遗憾的是,Medion S20 笔记本电脑相对较高的功耗在电池续航时间上也很明显。在我们的网页浏览测试中,仅用了不到八个半小时就结束了。在竞争对手的设备中,只有三星Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 的表现较差,其他机型的续航时间都较长。不过,Medion S20 的电池容量为 70 Wh,明显小于竞争对手,尽管这款 17.3 英寸笔记本电脑的机身非常大。
Medion S17431-MD62640 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 84 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 61.8 Wh | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 76 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99.9 Wh | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 77 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -10% | -28% | 27% | -13% | -6% | 25% | -11% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 509.4 | 756 48% | 443 -13% | 983 93% | 644 26% | 625 23% | 918 80% | 612 ? 20% |
Load | 203 | 68 -67% | 117 -42% | 124 -39% | 100 -51% | 134 -34% | 140 -31% | 117.8 ? -42% |
H.264 | 957 | 879 | 1308 | 1144 | 729 | 728 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 大型多媒体笔记本电脑,散热系统存在问题
Medion S20 是一款 17.3 英寸的大型多媒体笔记本电脑,尽管功能不错,但也存在一些不足之处。铝镁合金外壳结构坚固,宽度仅为 2 厘米。大显示屏提供了可接受的全高清分辨率,但没有出色的色彩还原能力,因此不太适合图像编辑。遗憾的是,USB 4 和 Thunderbolt 4 不在连接之列,但仍可操作总共三台外接显示器。
英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 和英特尔 Arc Graphics 的基准测试结果通常比同类机型要差。该设备最大的问题显然是散热系统太差:
Medion S20 笔记本电脑在多媒体笔记本电脑应该关注的许多重要方面都很薄弱。
价格和供应情况
Medion S20 笔记本电脑在 ALDI 的 在线商店中售价 999 欧元。.
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击 这里.
Medion S17431-MD62640
- 08/19/2024 v8
Philip Macdonald
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.