申克 XMG Evo 15 (M24) 笔记本电脑评测 - 拥有明亮显示屏和出色维护选项的德国超极本

Name: SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24)
Brand: SCHENKER

XMG 现在也没有专用 GPU。

德国制造商申克希望通过新款 XMG Evo 15 打入新的目标客户群，他们需要的是无需专用显卡的现代笔记本电脑。除了出色的 500 nit IPS 面板外，2x SO-DIMM 和 2x SSD 插槽的出色维护选项也尤为突出。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/02/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AI Arc Laptop / Notebook Meteor Lake Ultrabook Thunderbolt Windows

迄今为止，XMG 笔记本电脑主要面向游戏玩家和需要快速专用显卡的客户。随着新款 XMG Evo 型号（14 和 15 英寸）的推出，这家德国制造商现在也推出了两款不带专用图形处理器的超极本。这些机箱更加紧凑，但同时也无需大量的维护选项。该制造商还为客户提供了 AMD 的 Ryzen 8000 CPU（1049 欧元起）或英特尔的 Meteor Lake 芯片（1199 欧元起）供选择，申克认为，这不会导致性能上的重大差异。显示屏始终采用哑光 WQHD 面板（2560 x 1600 像素），亮度为 500 尼特，频率为 240 赫兹。

我们测试的新款 XMG Evo 15 (M24) 配备了英特尔酷睿 7 155H包括 Arc Graphics iGPU，以及 32 GB 内存（DDR5-5600）和 1 TB 版本的 Samsung 990 Pro。在此配置下（包括预装 Windows 11），价格为 1,400 欧元。

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24)

Processor

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 16 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 45 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H

Graphics adapter

Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, RAM: 2250 MHz, 31.0.101.5445

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, 2 Slots, max. 96 GB

Display

15.30 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 197 PPI, NE153QDM-NZ1, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH

Storage

Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB

, 878 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SDXC

Networking

Motorcomm YT6801 (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 342 x 240

Battery

99.9 Wh, 6450 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Camera

Webcam: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 100W PSU, USB stick with drivers, mouse pad, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.724 kg, Power Supply: 513 g

Price

1400 Euro

Links

SCHENKER homepage
SCHENKER notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
84.7 %	v8	08 / 2024	SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.7 kg	19.9 mm	15.30"	2560x1600
82.1 %	v8	07 / 2024	Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	2.1 kg	18.99 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
76.7 %	v8	07 / 2024	Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.6 kg	17.8 mm	16.00"	3840x2400
89.7 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	04 / 2024	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.9 kg	15.9 mm	16.00"	3072x1920
87.9 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	05 / 2024	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.9 kg	17.5 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
89.9 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	05 / 2024	Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE R7 7840U, Radeon 780M	1.8 kg	23.8 mm	16.00"	1920x1200

注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击这里.

外壳 - 坚固的铝制外壳

XMG Evo 15 采用黑色铝制机身，与 XMG Fusion 15 有些相似。 XMG Fusion 15游戏机。不过，Evo 15 的机身更加紧凑（尤其是更薄），而且两侧也没有散热口。总体而言，这款笔记本看起来非常简洁，在专业环境中使用也没有任何问题；如果需要，还可以订购显示盖上没有徽标的笔记本。不过，铝制表面对指纹相当敏感，需要定期清洁。

在质量方面，新款 Evo 15 表现出色，因为做工非常好，笔记本电脑整体给人一种高品质的印象。底座非常稳固，只有在中间键盘区域用手敲击时才会有一点凹陷。屏幕盖也很稳定，我们无法看到任何图像变形。最大打开角度为 180 度，铰链将屏幕稳稳地固定在原位，除了有轻微的弹跳外，单手打开也没有任何问题，这要归功于轻微的摄像头驼峰。

Evo 15 厚度约为 2 厘米，并不是最薄的笔记本，但也不追求最薄。不过，与同类 16 英寸笔记本相比，它的占地面积明显更小。Evo 15 的重量约为 1.7 千克，在我们的对比中也是较轻的机型之一。100 瓦的电源重量为 513 克，但这包括了长长的电源线（1.8 + 1.5 米）。

尺寸比较

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Medion S10 OLED Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) DIN A4 ❌

功能 - 雷电 4 和 USB 2.0

端口分布在后侧的两个区域和后部。原则上，包括 Thunderbolt 4（或 AMD 机型上的 USB 4.0）在内的所有现代标准都可用，USB 端口也很充足，但我们不知道 USB 2.0 端口在现代笔记本电脑上有什么用。至少只有一个，另外两个符合 USB 3.2 Gen1 标准。

左：Kensington NanoSaver Lock、USB-A 2.0、USB-C 3.2 Gen.2（10 Gbit/s、Display Port ALT 模式 1.4、Power Delivery）、3.5 毫米音频

右侧SDXC 读卡器，2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 Gbit/s）

后部：HDMI 2.0b、USB-C 4.0（带雷电 4（40 Gbit/s）、DisplayPort 2.1、Power Delivery）、千兆以太网

SD 读卡器

与我们的参考卡（Angelbird AV Pro V60）配合使用时，这款功能齐全的 SD 读卡器的传输速率高达 90 MB/s，复制数据时的传输速率约为 50 MB/s。总体而言，这些结果略低于平均水平。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (ADATA V90)	192 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	50.8 MB/s -74%
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years)	102.1 MB/s -47%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	74.1 MB/s -61%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	28.1 MB/s -85%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (ADATA V90)	261.7 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	89.9 MB/s -66%
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years)	142.7 MB/s -45%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	87.5 MB/s -67%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	28.9 MB/s -89%

交流

Evo 15 是少数仍配备 RJ45 千兆网络连接的现代多媒体笔记本之一。英特尔的 AX211 模块也可用于无线网络（Wi-Fi 6E）。与华硕的参考路由器配合使用，传输速率良好，测试期间 Wi-Fi 信号也没有问题。

Networking
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1612 (min: 1487) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1597 (min: 1431) MBit/s ∼93%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1171 (min: 541) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1393 (min: 1209) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	685 (min: 588) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	999 (min: 793) MBit/s ∼57%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1177 (min: 955) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1651 (min: 1601) MBit/s ∼96%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	671 (min: 610) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	901 (min: 877) MBit/s ∼53%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1656 (min: 1459) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1666 (min: 1617) MBit/s ∼97%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE Qualcomm WCN685x
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	711 (min: 573) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1712 (min: 1679) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	736 (min: 405) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1739 (min: 871) MBit/s ∼100%

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24); iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1612 (1487-1652)

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24); iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1597 (1431-1628)

网络摄像头

屏幕顶部边缘内置了一个带机械快门的 200 万像素摄像头，图像质量一般。还支持 Microsoft Studio 特效，额外的红外摄像头可通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。

ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24): 8.09 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 14.2 ∆E

配件

除了 100 瓦的电源装置外，供货范围还包括一个带驱动程序的 USB 盘和一个大号织物 XMG 鼠标垫。

维护

现在我们来看看 Evo 15 的亮点--维护选项。取下底盖（用普通十字螺丝固定）后，就可以接触到风扇和螺丝固定的电池，以及两个用于内存的 SO-DIMM 插槽和两个 M.2 2280 SSD 插槽，因此升级易如反掌。如有必要，还可以更换 WLAN 模块。

可持续性

全球国际货运公司（Schenker）的产品页面上没有任何关于笔记本电脑生产过程中产生的二氧化碳排放量的信息。包装主要由纸板和塑料制成。关于功耗，我们稍后再谈，但 1.4 瓦的待机功耗太高了。

输入设备 - 带数字键盘的大键盘

键盘占据了整个底座的宽度，还提供了一个专用数字小键盘，不过这些键的尺寸略小。不过，方向键的尺寸并没有缩小。整体输入体验非常舒适，即使是长篇文字也不成问题，尽管像 ThinkPad T16等商务笔记本电脑在这方面仍有优势。此外，特别是较大的按键声音较大，感觉有些摇晃。根据对客户的调查，全球国际货运公司决定不安装专用的副驾驶键。白色背光目前提供两个强度级别，但不久将发布更新，届时将提供四个强度级别。

ClickPad 的尺寸为 12.3 x 7.7 厘米，为输入和指针控制提供了足够的空间，但明显偏左，这需要一些时间来适应。单击板可以在下部区域单击，但这样会产生响亮而廉价的声音。

显示屏 - 240 赫兹的 IPS

申克采用了我们熟悉的 Fusion 15 的 240 Hz WQHD 面板，因此它是一款分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素的哑光 IPS 面板。主观的画面印象非常好，所有内容都非常清晰，色彩还原也很好，当然，你不能期待 OLED 面板的鲜艳色彩。不过，也没有出现 PWM 闪烁，但响应时间仍然很快。尽管采用了磨砂表面，但由于频率较高，即使是明亮的表面也不会出现颗粒感，动作也非常流畅。此外还支持自适应同步，但没有安装亮度传感器。

指定亮度为 500 cd/m²，但我们的测试设备达到了明显更好的效果，平均亮度为 585 cd/m²。不过，黑色值也因此受到影响，仅为 0.61 cd/m²，使黑色内容显得相当暗灰。此外，最大对比度仅为 ~1,000:1。


591 cd/m²	577 cd/m²	589 cd/m²
576 cd/m²	608 cd/m²	591 cd/m²
566 cd/m²	585 cd/m²	585 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

NE153QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 608 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 585.3 cd/m² Minimum: 0.82 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 608 cd/m²
Contrast: 997:1 (Black: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
74.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
73.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) NE153QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3", 240 Hz	Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 AU Optronics B160QAT, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 90 Hz	Medion S10 OLED Samsung SDC4174, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 60 Hz	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 TL160MDMP03_0, IPS, 3072x1920, 16", 165 Hz	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 NE160QDM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz	Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE B160UAN01.K, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16", Hz
Display		20%	23%	18%	-10%	2%
Display P3 Coverage	73.6	99.4 35%	99.9 36%	98.8 34%	63.3 -14%	75.9 3%
sRGB Coverage	100	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%	95.2 -5%	98.2 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	74.2	92.5 25%	98.6 33%	89.9 21%	65.3 -12%	77.2 4%
Response Times		-527%	71%	-437%	-141%	-548%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	4.6 ?(1.3, 2.3)	15.4 ?(8.6, 6.8) -235%	1.7 ?(0.9, 0.8) 63%	39.2 ?(15.8, 18.4) -752%	15 ?(7.4, 7.6) -226%	40.8 ?(19.1, 21.7) -787%
Response Time Black / White *	6.6 ?(2.8, 3.8)	60.6 ?(56.2, 4.4) -818%	1.4 ?(0.7, 0.7) 79%	14.6 ?(4.4, 10.2) -121%	10.3 ?(5.6, 4.7) -56%	26.9 ?(14.7, 12.2) -308%
PWM Frequency		2753.7 ?(100)	60 ?(100)
Screen		3%	329%	-8%	-12%	-31%
Brightness middle	608	413 -32%	307 -50%	520 -14%	368 -39%	446 -27%
Brightness	585	409 -30%	307 -48%	510 -13%	368 -37%	425 -27%
Brightness Distribution	93	97 4%	96 3%	93 0%	91 -2%	91 -2%
Black Level *	0.61	0.14 77%	0.01 98%	0.35 43%	0.31 49%	0.28 54%
Contrast	997	2950 196%	30700 2979%	1486 49%	1187 19%	1593 60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.1	3.48 -66%	2.1 -0%	2.9 -38%	2.4 -14%	3.7 -76%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.3	6.97 -62%	4.87 -13%	6.2 -44%	6.5 -51%	8.8 -105%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.2		2.08 -73%	1.1 8%	0.8 33%	1.6 -33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	4.5 -67%	0.9 67%	4.3 -59%	4.5 -67%	6 -122%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.15 ^102%	2.197 ^100%	2.19 ^100%	2.21 ^100%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6168 ^105%	6446 ^101%	6513 ^100%	7422 ^88%	6324 ^103%	6499 ^100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-168% / -75%	141% / 227%	-142% / -63%	-54% / -30%	-192% / -98%

* ... smaller is better

我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件（X-Rite i1 Pro2）对面板进行了测量，您可以在控制中心下载制造商提供的预校准配置文件，我们也使用该配置文件进行了测量。不过，这里的色温有点偏暖，而且有些颜色和灰度值超过了 3 的目标值。通过我们自己的校准（可在上面免费下载配置文件），我们可以明显改善显示效果，而且所有值都在目标范围内。因此，Evo 15 也适用于无限制地编辑图像/视频。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.8 ms rise
6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.3 ms rise
4.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

得益于高亮度，磨砂面板在户外的表现非常出色，即使在明亮的天气里，也能清晰地看到内容。IPS 面板的可视角度稳定性非常好。

性能 - Meteor Lake 和高达 96GB 内存

XMG Evo 15 可配备 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS或英特尔酷睿 7 155H或英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 155H。两个内存插槽最多可容纳 96 GB DDR5 内存，但由于散热限制，在使用 48 GB 模块时，频率从 5600 MHz 限制为 4800 MHz。

测试条件

预装的控制中心提供三种不同的能耗配置文件（平衡、发烧和超频），也可以使用 Fn+F3 组合键方便地进行切换。我们使用标准的Enthusiast 配置文件进行了基准测试和测量。我们在下表中总结了三种配置文件的性能值：

能源概况	CPU TDP	CPU TDP（电池）	CB R23 Multi	Time Spy 图形	max.风扇容量
平衡型	35 瓦	25 瓦	12,759 点	2,623 点	35.4 dB(A)
发烧级	45 瓦	35 瓦	14,957 点	3,690 点	40.4 dB(A)
超增压	70 瓦	35 瓦	18,790 分	3,633 分	48.1 dB(A)

处理器 - Core Ultra 7 155H

英特尔英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 155H 目前用于许多笔记本电脑，但 XMG Evo 15 是为数不多的没有增加短期功耗限制的机型之一。在 "发烧友 "模式下，功耗为 45 瓦，且该值保持不变（这也适用于 70 瓦和 35 瓦的其他性能配置文件），在连续负载下性能不会下降。在 "发烧友 "模式下，性能已经非常出色，但如果需要更多功率，可以轻松使用 "超频 "模式（多核性能提升 25%）。不过，在电池模式下，最大功耗降至 35 瓦，性能降低了 15%。更多 CPU 基准测试请参见技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2256 (2231.27-2277.52)

Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2278 (2205.8-2679.71)

Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2345 (2300.97-2382.8)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2433 (2259.12-2745.18)

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2651 (2550.53-2701.61)

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø2040 (2010.86-2119.65)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	82.3 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	81.1 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	77 pt
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	76.5 pt
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	75.6 pt
Average of class Multimedia	75 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	73.4 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	71.6 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17780 Points +19%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17401 Points +16%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	15802 (14802^min - 15802.2^max) Points +6%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	15564 Points +4%
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years)	15387 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	14957 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9769 - 19007, n=47)	14916 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	13053 Points -13%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1801 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1777 Points +2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1759 Points +1%
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years)	1757 Points +1%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1756 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1744 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1496 - 1815, n=47)	1726 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	1708 Points -2%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6947 Points +20%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6671 Points +15%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6185 Points +7%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6164 Points +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3798 - 7409, n=45)	5791 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5784 Points
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years)	5683 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	5082 Points -12%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	691 Points +1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	691 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	684 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	678 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	667 Points -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	667 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (601 - 696, n=45)	665 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years)	652 Points -5%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2745 (2259.12^min - 2745.18^max) Points +21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2702 (2550.53^min - 2701.61^max) Points +19%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2680 (2205.8^min - 2679.71^max) Points +18%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1932 - 2880, n=51)	2445 Points +7%
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years)	2435 Points +7%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2383 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2278 (2231.27^min - 2277.52^max) Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	2120 (2010.86^min - 2119.65^max) Points -7%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	268 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	267 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	264 Points
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	259 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years)	257 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	256 Points -3%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	256 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (99.6 - 268, n=47)	249 Points -6%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years)	253 Seconds * -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	245 Seconds * -17%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (175 - 381, n=43)	234 Seconds * -12%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	209 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	209 Seconds *
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	202 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	195 Seconds * +7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	190 Seconds * +9%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	68535 MIPS +11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	68254 MIPS +11%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	63597 MIPS +3%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	61660 MIPS
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)	60265 MIPS -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (41739 - 70254, n=45)	58973 MIPS -4%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	58874 MIPS -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	56666 MIPS -8%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	5940 MIPS +6%
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)	5722 MIPS +2%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5618 MIPS
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5562 MIPS -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5486 MIPS -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5458 MIPS -3%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5374 MIPS -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (4795 - 5621, n=45)	5343 MIPS -5%

Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13501 Points +9%
Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 22544, n=62, last 2 years)	13411 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13291 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12343 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (7732 - 13656, n=50)	12279 Points -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12243 Points -1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11581 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	11363 Points -8%

Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=58, last 2 years)	2652 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	2519 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2473 Points
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2464 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2459 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2414 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1901 - 2473, n=47)	2378 Points -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2356 Points -5%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13276 Points +15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12975 Points +12%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12331 Points +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10017 - 13556, n=47)	12016 Points +4%
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years)	11967 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11579 Points
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11269 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	10003 Points -14%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1819 Points
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years)	1818 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1814 Points 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1801 Points -1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1796 Points -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1760 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	1753 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1462 - 1824, n=47)	1753 Points -4%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	20.3 fps +16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.5 fps +11%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17.9 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17.5 fps
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.7 fps -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	16.4 fps -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9.93 - 21.2, n=45)	16.4 fps -6%
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)	16.4 fps -6%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years)	49.6 s * -12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40.9 - 79.2, n=44)	49 s * -11%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	48.2 s * -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	45.7 s * -3%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	45.6 s * -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	44.5 s * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	44.2 s *
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	44.1 s * -0%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)	0.484 sec * -9%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4837 sec * -9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.4457 - 0.53, n=44)	0.4819 sec * -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	0.4753 sec * -7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4692 sec * -5%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4675 sec * -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4626 sec * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4457 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2278 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

150.7 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

264 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

5784 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

684 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1744 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

14957 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

108 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

882 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	90.7 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	89.3 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	80.7 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	78.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	78.2 pt
Average of class Multimedia	76.8 pt
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	76.5 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	74.6 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	20854 KRay/s +60%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	17004 KRay/s +31%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	14712 KRay/s +13%
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years)	14429 KRay/s +11%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	14281 KRay/s +10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	14272 KRay/s +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=45)	13101 KRay/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13004 KRay/s

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	87858 Points +25%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	87764 Points +25%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	77094 Points +10%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	76175 Points +9%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	75538 Points +8%
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years)	72714 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	70044 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=45)	69488 Points -1%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3969 MB/s +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	3953 MB/s +19%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3545 MB/s +7%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3508 MB/s +6%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3480 MB/s +5%
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years)	3389 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3323 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=45)	3244 MB/s -2%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	97793 Points +24%
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years)	90849 Points +15%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	89661 Points +14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	88106 Points +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	85567 Points +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=45)	83491 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	78944 Points
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	78009 Points -1%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	13146 Points +38%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	10647 Points +12%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	10066 Points +6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	10012 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9513 Points
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years)	9329 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=45)	9119 Points -4%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9030 Points -5%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	46549 Points +37%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	43855 Points +29%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	38466 Points +13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	37438 Points +10%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	36925 Points +9%
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years)	36169 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	33997 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=45)	33738 Points -1%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	124554 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	83176 MB/s -33%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=45)	78240 MB/s -37%
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years)	75995 MB/s -39%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	74060 MB/s -41%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	74058 MB/s -41%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	72068 MB/s -42%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69238 MB/s -44%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1160 MB/s +22%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1041 MB/s +9%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1018 MB/s +7%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1004 MB/s +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=45)	960 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	954 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years)	935 MB/s -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	887 MB/s -7%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	10875 KRay/s +57%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	8903 KRay/s +28%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7936 KRay/s +14%
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years)	7836 KRay/s +13%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7640 KRay/s +10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7584 KRay/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	6940 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=45)	6848 KRay/s -1%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	53611 MPixel/s +18%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	52218 MPixel/s +15%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=45)	46541 MPixel/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	45272 MPixel/s
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	43340 MPixel/s -4%
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years)	40459 MPixel/s -11%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	39025 MPixel/s -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	38173 MPixel/s -16%

系统性能

Evo 15 的整体系统性能非常出色，在日常使用中速度非常快。在测试期间，我们也没有遇到系统稳定性方面的问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7331 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	7186 Points -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	7037 Points -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	6994 Points -5%
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)	6795 Points -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5159 - 7529, n=32)	6732 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	6421 Points -12%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	6247 Points -15%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	11289 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	11214 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	11076 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	10964 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8580 - 11289, n=32)	10563 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)	10521 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	9904 Points -12%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	9459 Points -16%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)	8932 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	8927 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	8922 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	8904 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	8791 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (7822 - 10591, n=32)	8749 Points -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	8470 Points -5%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	8215 Points -8%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10709 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	9999 Points -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	9993 Points -7%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	9712 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)	9202 Points -14%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (4985 - 10709, n=32)	9011 Points -16%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	8513 Points -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	8132 Points -24%

CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1836 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1771 Points -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	1707 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years)	1703 Points -7%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1699 Points -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=32)	1655 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	1608 Points -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1546 Points -16%

CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1798 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1704 Points -5%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1656 Points -8%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	1628 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years)	1616 Points -10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1291 - 1798, n=31)	1581 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	1557 Points -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1447 Points -20%

CrossMark / Creativity
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1916 Points +2%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	1913 Points +1%
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years)	1909 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1886 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1848 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=31)	1817 Points -4%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1803 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	1754 Points -7%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1802 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1572 Points -13%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1539 Points -15%
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years)	1435 Points -20%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	1397 Points -22%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (939 - 1802, n=31)	1396 Points -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	1363 Points -24%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1106 Points -39%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=84, last 2 years)	312 Points +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	285 Points +1%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	285 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	281 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	279 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (252 - 299, n=32)	276 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	262 Points -7%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	256 Points -9%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	260 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	259 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=76, last 2 years)	259 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	258 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (234 - 309, n=27)	254 Points -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	252 Points -3%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	234 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	194.4 Points -25%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	573 ms * -7%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	573 ms * -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	571 ms * -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (517 - 614, n=33)	541 ms * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	535 ms *
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	529 ms * +1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	528 ms * +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	517 ms * +3%
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=88, last 2 years)	510 ms * +5%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		7331 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	94158 MB/s +33%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	93443 MB/s +32%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=45)	83293 MB/s +18%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	78983 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	70752 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years)	68580 MB/s -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	67760 MB/s -4%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	66880 MB/s -5%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	87063 MB/s +17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	85824 MB/s +16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=45)	79984 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	74119 MB/s
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	73708 MB/s -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	73509 MB/s -1%
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years)	69599 MB/s -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	50402 MB/s -32%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	89716 MB/s +29%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	76048 MB/s +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	75937 MB/s +9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=45)	72558 MB/s +5%
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years)	69752 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69373 MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69181 MB/s 0%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	66061 MB/s -5%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (120.2 - 233, n=45)	144.2 ns * -9%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	143.9 ns * -8%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	140.2 ns * -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	139.9 ns * -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	137.6 ns * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	132.8 ns *
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	129 ns * +3%
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years)	106.6 ns * +20%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试（上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时略有限制。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2995.3 μs * -158%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1160.3 μs *
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	842.9 μs * +27%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	824.4 μs * +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	674.4 μs * +42%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	600.7 μs * +48%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

XMG Evo 15 (M24) 提供两个 M.2-2280 插槽，通过 PCIe 4.0 连接，还支持 RAID 阵列（0/1）。Evo 标配 500 GB WD Blue SN580，但我们的测试设备配备的是 1 TB 版本的三星 990 Pro，这是一款速度极快的固态硬盘，传输速率高达 7 GB/s。此外，即使在长时间负载的情况下，性能也能保持完全稳定，这并非理所当然。初始启动后，用户可支配的容量为 878 GB。更多固态硬盘基准测试这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7118 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6897 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 766 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 480 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 96.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 259 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 2031 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2671 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	95.7 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	87 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	63.1 pt
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	61.5 pt
Average of class Multimedia	57.5 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	51.3 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	50.5 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	49.5 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	4554 (4440.09^min - 4553.67^max) MB/s +37%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3335 (3172.57^min - 3334.93^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (2556 - 4234, n=18)	3249 MB/s -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	3237 (3127.1^min - 3236.53^max) MB/s -3%
Average of class Multimedia (1629 - 4861, n=76, last 2 years)	2970 MB/s -11%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	2772 (2598.84^min - 2771.51^max) MB/s -17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2254 (2201.38^min - 2254.23^max) MB/s -32%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2049 (2028.99^min - 2049.34^max) MB/s -39%
seq write
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5711 (5666.08^min - 5711.29^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (3598 - 5842, n=18)	4777 MB/s -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	3471 (3431.21^min - 3471.39^max) MB/s -39%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	3229 (3069.6^min - 3229.15^max) MB/s -43%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	3150 (2866.18^min - 3149.7^max) MB/s -45%
Average of class Multimedia (463 - 5711, n=76, last 2 years)	3092 MB/s -46%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2916 (2664.35^min - 2915.5^max) MB/s -49%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2330 (2272.26^min - 2329.73^max) MB/s -59%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	7113 (6578.98^min - 7112.7^max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7096 (6240.81^min - 7096.2^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (7011 - 7148, n=18)	7091 MB/s 0%
Average of class Multimedia (2132 - 7126, n=76, last 2 years)	5486 MB/s -23%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	5199 (4613.53^min - 5199.14^max) MB/s -27%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	5148 (4531.57^min - 5148.3^max) MB/s -27%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3727 (3040.66^min - 3726.94^max) MB/s -47%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	3645 (2982.87^min - 3645.22^max) MB/s -49%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6898 (6856.93^min - 6897.79^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (6531 - 6898, n=18)	6802 MB/s -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	6009 (5981.29^min - 6008.76^max) MB/s -13%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	4537 (4423.9^min - 4536.71^max) MB/s -34%
Average of class Multimedia (555 - 6898, n=76, last 2 years)	4169 MB/s -40%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	3925 (3848.76^min - 3924.82^max) MB/s -43%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	3269 (3263.59^min - 3269^max) MB/s -53%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2409 (2377.61^min - 2408.59^max) MB/s -65%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	97.7 (97.44^min - 97.7^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (55.3 - 99, n=18)	76.4 MB/s -22%
Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 97.7, n=76, last 2 years)	62.9 MB/s -36%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	60.5 (59.69^min - 60.52^max) MB/s -38%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	60 (58.96^min - 60.01^max) MB/s -39%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	59.8 (58.4^min - 59.75^max) MB/s -39%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	54.8 (51.93^min - 54.84^max) MB/s -44%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	51.2 (49.25^min - 51.22^max) MB/s -48%
4k q1 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	271 (267.09^min - 270.91^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (133.9 - 343, n=18)	235 MB/s -13%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	206 (197.33^min - 206.13^max) MB/s -24%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	193 (186.4^min - 192.95^max) MB/s -29%
Average of class Multimedia (69.4 - 378, n=76, last 2 years)	170.9 MB/s -37%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	155.6 (149.42^min - 155.61^max) MB/s -43%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	141.2 (137.96^min - 141.21^max) MB/s -48%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	69.4 (65.86^min - 69.42^max) MB/s -74%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4881 (4865.14^min - 4881.2^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (818 - 4926, n=18)	3327 MB/s -32%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1947 (1678.71^min - 1946.99^max) MB/s -60%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1684 (1639.23^min - 1684.06^max) MB/s -65%
Average of class Multimedia (295 - 4881, n=76, last 2 years)	1357 MB/s -72%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	925 (898.46^min - 924.71^max) MB/s -81%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	569 (553.78^min - 569.31^max) MB/s -88%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	387 (351.99^min - 386.95^max) MB/s -92%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3228 (3210.55^min - 3228.24^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (413 - 4683, n=18)	2563 MB/s -21%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2441 (2399.8^min - 2440.79^max) MB/s -24%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1142 (1093.19^min - 1142.3^max) MB/s -65%
Average of class Multimedia (192.1 - 4074, n=76, last 2 years)	1025 MB/s -68%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	461 (430.21^min - 460.94^max) MB/s -86%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	377 (370.57^min - 377.49^max) MB/s -88%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	230 (216.81^min - 229.87^max) MB/s -93%

AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	8349 Points
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (5405 - 10591, n=18)	8308 Points 0%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	6090 Points -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	5498 Points -34%
Average of class Multimedia (2033 - 9972, n=73, last 2 years)	5061 Points -39%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	4613 Points -45%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	4369 Points -48%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	3893 Points -53%
Score Read
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (1349 - 4721, n=18)	2891 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2657 Points
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2411 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia (669 - 3501, n=73, last 2 years)	1630 Points -39%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1511 Points -43%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	1256 Points -53%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	1130 Points -57%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	887 Points -67%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4311 Points
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (2308 - 4852, n=18)	4043 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	3808 Points -12%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	2763 Points -36%
Average of class Multimedia (656 - 4813, n=73, last 2 years)	2660 Points -38%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2619 Points -39%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2437 Points -43%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2107 Points -51%
Seq Read
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5450 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (4362 - 5760, n=18)	5211 MB/s -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	4728 MB/s -13%
Average of class Multimedia (1718 - 5730, n=73, last 2 years)	4248 MB/s -22%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	4076.04 MB/s -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	3385 MB/s -38%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3252 MB/s -40%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2868.99 MB/s -47%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5651 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (3376 - 5651, n=18)	4712 MB/s -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2934 MB/s -48%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2908.39 MB/s -49%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	2810.56 MB/s -50%
Average of class Multimedia (414 - 5651, n=73, last 2 years)	2749 MB/s -51%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2714 MB/s -52%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	2687 MB/s -52%
4K Read
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	85.3 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (52.7 - 90.9, n=18)	71.6 MB/s -16%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	68.68 MB/s -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	64.1 MB/s -25%
Average of class Multimedia (28.7 - 98.5, n=73, last 2 years)	61.6 MB/s -28%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	59.26 MB/s -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	59.1 MB/s -31%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	46.9 MB/s -45%
4K Write
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	243 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (172.3 - 306, n=18)	223 MB/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia (66.5 - 328, n=73, last 2 years)	190.3 MB/s -22%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	182.5 MB/s -25%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	178.65 MB/s -26%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	176.9 MB/s -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	169.1 MB/s -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	161.7 MB/s -33%
4K-64 Read
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (787 - 3182, n=18)	2252 MB/s +11%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2055.8 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2027 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (350 - 2989, n=73, last 2 years)	1144 MB/s -44%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1138 MB/s -44%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	788.91 MB/s -61%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	733 MB/s -64%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	350 MB/s -83%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3502 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	3370 MB/s -4%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (1592 - 4090, n=18)	3356 MB/s -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	2304.92 MB/s -34%
Average of class Multimedia (411 - 4265, n=73, last 2 years)	2195 MB/s -37%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2164 MB/s -38%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1967.43 MB/s -44%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1653 MB/s -53%
Access Time Read
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	0.092 ms * -384%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	0.07 ms * -268%
Average of class Multimedia (0.018 - 0.15, n=73, last 2 years)	0.0551 ms * -190%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	0.045 ms * -137%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	0.037 ms * -95%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (0.018 - 0.074, n=18)	0.0345 ms * -82%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	0.022 ms * -16%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.019 ms *
Access Time Write
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	0.101 ms * -531%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	0.063 ms * -294%
Average of class Multimedia (0.013 - 0.414, n=73, last 2 years)	0.06104 ms * -282%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	0.028 ms * -75%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	0.026 ms * -63%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N	0.023 ms * -44%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (0.012 - 0.053, n=18)	0.01978 ms * -24%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.016 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24); diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7091 (6667.69-7122.57)

图形卡 - Intel Arc Graphics

Evo 15 使用集成的弧形图形尽管这是配备 8 个 Xe 内核的快速版本。iGPU 得益于双通道内存配置，与采用更快的 7467 内存的竞争对手相比（如红米本 Pro 16），它的 iGPU 性能更胜一筹。红米笔记本 Pro 16或 IdeaPad Pro 5 16)相比，合成基准测试中的图形性能总体上仅略低一些。图形性能 Radeon 780M在基准测试中刚刚被超越。在 GPU 表格中，我们还包括了申克 Via 14 Pro的性能与配备 AMD 处理器的 XMG Evo 15 不相上下。

目前的英特尔 GPU 是日常多媒体的不错选择，最近几个月的驱动程序更新也提高了游戏性能，总的来说没有什么意外。不过，在实际游戏性能方面，Arc Graphics 失去了领先优势，iGPU 最终在性能上处于同一水平。

图形性能在持续负载下保持不变，但在电池模式下性能下降了约 26%。更多 GPU 基准测试可在技术部分.

GPU Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 6.3

GPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	99.2 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	73.3 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	72.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	71.9 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	69.1 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	67 pt
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	65.3 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	60.1 pt
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	53.2 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=77, last 2 years)	20075 Points +50%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	13734 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13539 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13403 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13381 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12670 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	12453 Points -7%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8064 - 13716, n=35)	11984 Points -11%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9156 Points -32%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=80, last 2 years)	14437 Points +65%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9692 Points +11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9650 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	8749 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	8567 Points -2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8345 Points -5%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5568 - 9692, n=39)	8302 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	7663 Points -12%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6365 Points -27%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=81, last 2 years)	5446 Points +48%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3770 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3690 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3656 Points -1%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (2018 - 3770, n=42)	3231 Points -12%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3023 Points -18%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2915 Points -21%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2643 Points -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	2631 Points -29%

Geekbench 6.3
GPU OpenCL
Average of class Multimedia (9994 - 112310, n=57, last 2 years)	52106 Points +49%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	35957 Points +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	35855 Points +3%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	35156 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	34948 Points
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (17911 - 39941, n=41)	32332 Points -7%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	30818 Points -12%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	27410 Points -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	28644 Points -18%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	24915 Points -29%
GPU Vulkan
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	35745 Points +3%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	35544 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	34755 Points
Average of class Multimedia (11351 - 92135, n=47, last 2 years)	34313 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	33886 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	33442 Points -4%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (16515 - 37129, n=40)	31483 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	29293 Points -16%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	28575 Points -18%

3DMark 11 Performance		13430 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		7941 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		4067 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		757 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		3248 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom CPU | v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (294 - 692, n=38)	430 Seconds * -20%
Average of class Multimedia (189 - 946, n=84, last 2 years)	430 Seconds * -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	407 Seconds * -14%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	367 Seconds * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	357 Seconds *
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	347 Seconds * +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	344 Seconds * +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	339 Seconds * +5%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (208 - 261, n=13)	228 Seconds *
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	219 Seconds *
Average of class Multimedia (203 - 215, n=3, last 2 years)	209 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	100 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	58 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) ^-1! AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	57.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	55.9 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	55.6 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	54.7 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	49.6 pt
Medion S10 OLED ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	42.2 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)	54 fps +108%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	26 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	25.5 (24^min, 24^P1) fps -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	25.1 (23^min, 24^P1) fps -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	24.9 (20^min) fps -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	23.9 (23^min) fps -8%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years)	53.5 fps +201%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	26.1 (3.05^min, 18.2^P1) fps +47%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	24.2 (2.78^min, 16.9^P1) fps +36%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	17.8 (3.01^min, 13.5^P1) fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	16 (2.73^min, 11.4^P1) fps -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	15.9 (2.93^min, 11.4^P1) fps -11%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	11.4 (1.718^min, 8.77^P1) fps -36%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=81, last 2 years)	50.9 fps +74%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	30.6 fps +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	30.5 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	29.2 fps
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.8 fps -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	26.8 fps -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	24.5 fps -16%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	20.9 fps -28%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=80, last 2 years)	87.4 fps +68%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	55 fps +6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	53 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	52 fps
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	49 fps -6%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	45.4 (5^min, 8.91^P1) fps -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	43.7 (17.1^min, 33.7^P1) fps -16%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	35.6 (5^min, 6.04^P1) fps -32%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 179.9, n=82, last 2 years)	96.4 fps +20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	80.6 (55.9^min) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	80.5 (54.8^min) fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	79.8 (51.5^min) fps -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	78 (52.7^min) fps -3%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	75.1 (65.6^min) fps -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	65.8 (57.7^min) fps -18%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	60.6 (38.4^min) fps -25%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 141.1, n=82, last 2 years)	66.8 fps +87%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	40.1 fps +12%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	35.8 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	33.5 fps -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	32.4 fps -9%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	30.9 fps -14%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	30.2 fps -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	26.6 fps -26%

Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS chart

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core: Ø21.9 (20.7-23.8)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	169.3	160.2	44.7	17.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)	152	93	49	26
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	107.4	90.8	83.3	80.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	77	40.3	29.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	54	40.4	35.8
Far Cry 5 (2018)	77	43	41	38
Strange Brigade (2018)	171	73	62	52
F1 22 (2022)	96.1	87	65.2	16.9
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	40.3	31.1	27.5	26.2
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	37.9	31.4	26.7	23.7
Total War Pharaoh (2023)	101.4	77.6	58.9	52

排放 - 日常生活中的安静

噪音排放

Evo 15 的散热系统在空转或低负载时通常处于停用或非常安静的状态。如果笔记本电脑的负载较高，则取决于主动能源配置文件。在发烧友模式下，最大噪音为 40.4 dB(A)，在平衡模式和电池模式下，最大噪音为 35.4 dB(A)。如果想在Overboost 模式下使用处理器的全部功率，散热会明显变大，最大可达 48.1 dB(A)。一旦负载阶段结束，风扇又会迅速降速（在每个配置文件中）。Evo 15 测试设备中没有其他电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle		24.7 / 24.7 / 28.9 dB(A)
Load		32.7 / 40.4 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.7 dB(A)

	SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
Noise		-4%	-9%	4%	-6%	8%
off / environment *	24.7	22.9 7%	25 -1%	24.4 1%	24.1 2%	24.5 1%
Idle Minimum *	24.7	22.9 7%	26 -5%	24.4 1%	24.1 2%	24.5 1%
Idle Average *	24.7	22.9 7%	27 -9%	24.4 1%	24.1 2%	24.5 1%
Idle Maximum *	28.9	25 13%	28 3%	24.4 16%	28.2 2%	24.5 15%
Load Average *	32.7	45.1 -38%	43 -31%	32 2%	44.4 -36%	26.6 19%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	40.4	44.9 -11%	42 -4%
Load Maximum *	40.4	44.9 -11%	48 -19%	39.7 2%	44.4 -10%	35.5 12%
Witcher 3 ultra *				30.6	36.5	37.2

* ... smaller is better

温度

Evo 15 的铝制外壳在低负载时非常凉爽，即使在负载情况下也没有问题。在极端情况下，底部温度可达近 50 °C，但热点位于后部中间区域的底部。该设备甚至可以放在大腿上使用。键盘区域整体温度明显较低，即使在负载情况下也是如此，打字时没有任何限制。在压力测试中，处理器始终保持指定的 TDP 值。

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


38.5 °C	41.7 °C	41.1 °C
34.8 °C	39.3 °C	38.4 °C
29.1 °C	32 °C	31.5 °C

Maximum: 41.7 °C
Average: 36.3 °C


47.8 °C	49.6 °C	43.4 °C
43.3 °C	49.5 °C	39.5 °C
33.3 °C	33.7 °C	31.1 °C

Maximum: 49.6 °C
Average: 41.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45.1 °C | Room Temperature 22.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


30.1 °C	31.1 °C	30.9 °C
28.9 °C	30.2 °C	29.7 °C
27.5 °C	28.2 °C	28.6 °C

Maximum: 31.1 °C
Average: 29.5 °C


32.7 °C	33.1 °C	32.5 °C
31.9 °C	32.2 °C	29.7 °C
29.1 °C	29.1 °C	28.5 °C

Maximum: 33.1 °C
Average: 31 °C

Power Supply (max.) 29.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


35.8 °C	40.2 °C	38.6 °C
33.3 °C	37.3 °C	36 °C
27.8 °C	29.7 °C	29.8 °C

Maximum: 40.2 °C
Average: 34.3 °C


47.2 °C	47.4 °C	43.6 °C
40.1 °C	47.4 °C	37.3 °C
29.8 °C	31.1 °C	29.4 °C

Maximum: 47.4 °C
Average: 39.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.6 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.2 °C / -5.8 F).

	SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
Heat		-1%	-12%	10%	19%	4%
Maximum Upper Side *	41.7	46.8 -12%	55 -32%	40.3 3%	36.3 13%	48.7 -17%
Maximum Bottom *	49.6	45.6 8%	55 -11%	45.9 7%	39.1 21%	52 -5%
Idle Upper Side *	31.1	32.2 -4%	32 -3%	26.3 15%	24.9 20%	26.4 15%
Idle Bottom *	33.1	31.4 5%	33 -0%	27.9 16%	26.1 21%	26.3 21%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

Evo 15 提供两个立体声扬声器，音质不错。虽然有一些多媒体笔记本电脑的音响系统更好（扬声器数量也更多），但在对比组中，Evo 是这方面最好的机型之一。整体音质清晰，只有低音部分有明显的衰减。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Medion S10 OLED audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理

耗电量

大而亮的显示屏对功耗有一定影响，我们测得空闲模式下的最大功耗略低于 14 瓦。在游戏和压力测试中，功耗均为 76-78 瓦，并且保持绝对稳定，因此 100 瓦的电源完全够用。在Overboost 配置文件中，我们测得的最大功率为 107.9 瓦，因此电源没有更多的余地为电池充电等。不过，电池在这里也不会被耗尽。如前所述，1.4 瓦的待机功耗过高。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.38 / 1.4 Watt
Idle	7.7 / 13.2 / 13.7 Watt
Load	76.2 / 78.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3"	Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Micron 2550 1TB, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16"	Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, YMTC PC300-1TB, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16"	Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Average of class Multimedia
Power Consumption		3%	10%	1%	20%	40%	19%	-3%
Idle Minimum *	7.7	6.1 21%	7 9%	4.2 45%	3.5 55%	3.7 52%	5.41 ?(1.8 - 10.3, n=37) 30%	6.78 ?(2.17 - 21.1, n=86, last 2 years) 12%
Idle Average *	13.2	13.5 -2%	10 24%	11.6 12%	9.6 27%	7.2 45%	8.64 ?(4.2 - 16, n=37) 35%	11.3 ?(4.6 - 30, n=86, last 2 years) 14%
Idle Maximum *	13.7	13.8 -1%	19 -39%	12.3 10%	9.9 28%	8.7 36%	12.1 ?(4.5 - 49, n=37) 12%	13.4 ?(5.6 - 30.4, n=86, last 2 years) 2%
Load Average *	76.2	63.6 17%	52 32%	61.9 19%	62.7 18%	44.1 42%	54.2 ?(31.3 - 76.2, n=36) 29%	71.1 ?(14.3 - 147, n=84, last 2 years) 7%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	76.7	67 13%	53.2 31%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	72.7	64.6 11%	49.2 32%
Load Maximum *	78.1	109.7 -40%	95 -22%	140.6 -80%	101.2 -30%	58.2 25%	85 ?(60 - 144.9, n=37) -9%	117.3 ?(47.7 - 270, n=85, last 2 years) -50%
Witcher 3 ultra *				57	55.8	50.9

* ... smaller is better

Powr consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø77.4 (75.8-78.7)

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø10.3 (9.43-14.3)

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø76.7 (74.7-78.4)

Power consumption with the external monitor

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø64 (61.4-65.9)

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø64 (63.5-65.3)

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24); Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø33.9 (27.2-43)

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø62.8 (62.3-64)

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø69.6 (66.7-76.6)

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.87 (6.89-10.3)

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø72.7 (71.6-74.5)

电池寿命

申克公司在 Evo 15 中安装了一块 99.8 瓦时的大容量电池，尽管显示屏耗电量大，但总体运行时间良好。 Medion S10的续航时间更长。在 150 cd/m²（相当于测试设备最大亮度的 58%）的 WLAN 测试中，我们在 60 Hz 下测得 10:25 小时，在 240 Hz 下测得 08:25 小时。在全亮度条件下，运行时间降至 8 小时（60 赫兹）或 6:39 小时（240 赫兹），因此您一定要降低电池模式下的使用频率。

视频测试的运行时间略高于 12 小时，在负载情况下，最坏的情况是 2:14 小时。设备开机时，充满电需要 165 分钟（130 分钟后充满 80%），而且没有快速充电功能。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		10h 25min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		8h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 9min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 14min

	SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99.9 Wh	Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 90 Wh	Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 84 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 52.5 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		-11%	-30%	43%	1%	-27%	-5%
H.264	729			1308 79%	957 31%		821 ?(319 - 1481, n=52, last 2 years) 13%
WiFi v1.3	625	686 10%	436 -30%	983 57%	756 21%	658 5%	628 ?(279 - 1204, n=84, last 2 years) 0%
Load	134	93 -31%		124 -7%	68 -49%	56 -58%	97.8 ?(39 - 212, n=64, last 2 years) -27%

Pros

+ 坚固的铝制外壳

+ 非常出色的系统性能

+ 稳定的 CPU 性能

+ 明亮的真彩色 IPS 面板，240 Hz

+ 很好的维护选项（最多 96 GB 内存）

+ 不错的键盘

+ 连接众多

+ 电池寿命长

+ 有英特尔和 AMD 两种型号

Cons

- 一个 2.0 标准 USB 端口

- 无 Wi-Fi 7

- 黑阶增加/对比度可能更好

结论 - 无 dGPU 的最佳多媒体笔记本之一

德国制造商申克公司推出了新款 XMG Evo 15 (M24)，这是一款无需专用显卡的优秀多媒体笔记本电脑。虽然它不是市场上最薄的笔记本电脑，但 Evo 15 并不以此为目标。另一方面，它有很好的维护选项，内存（最大 96 GB）和固态硬盘容量（2 个 M.2-2280 插槽）都可以轻松升级。此外，该机还配备了足够多的端口，不过我们不禁要问，一个老式的 USB 2.0 端口是如何出现在这款设备上的。不过，由于有大量其他快速 USB 端口（英特尔有 Thunderbolt 4，AMD 有 USB 4.0），这并不是什么大问题。在输入设备和扬声器方面，也没有什么可抱怨的。

说到显示屏，你会发现它与游戏的渊源以及与 XMG Fusion 15但这并不是缺点。雾面 IPS 面板具有高分辨率和 240 Hz 的快速频率。此外，没有 PWM，响应时间也很快。亮度非常好，接近 600 cd/m²，这反过来又影响了黑阶，从而影响了对比度。任何期待像 OLED 面板那样丰富黑色的人肯定会失望。校准后，色彩准确度非常出色，由于完全覆盖了 sRGB，该面板也适用于图像编辑。99.8 Wh 的大容量电池可以很好地补偿显示屏的功耗，总体而言，离开电源插座后的续航能力还算不错。

出色的维护选项、色彩准确的亮丽 IPS 显示屏、性能良好的数值以及连贯的能耗曲线：全新的申克 XMG Evo 15 是一款令人兴奋的多媒体笔记本电脑，没有专用显卡，可同时使用 AMD 和英特尔处理器，没有真正的弱点。

配备英特尔处理器的 Evo 15 整体性能非常出色，最重要的是性能稳定，因为没有过高的短期功耗限制。如果需要更高的性能，可以使用超频模式，但必须忍受更响的风扇声。但总的来说，Evo 15 是一款非常安静的产品，尤其适合日常工作。

有了这些优点，新款 Evo 15 在市场上几乎是无与伦比的。问题在于，你应该选择英特尔还是 AMD 型号。虽然 AMD 机型只有 USB 4.0 而不是 Thunderbolt 4，但制造商声称其性能（尽管 Ryzen 7 8845HS 的功耗限制略低于 AMD 机型）比英特尔机型更强。 Ryzen 7 8845HS性能相当。我们也不指望电池续航时间会有什么巨大差异，这就引出了一个问题：为什么消费者要多花 150 欧元购买英特尔处理器？AMD 型号的起价为 1,049 欧元，性价比无疑更高。

价格和供应情况

新型申克 XMG Evo 15 (M24) 现在可以从Bestware 订购。AMD 型号起价 1049 欧元，英特尔型号起价 1199 欧元。

注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击这里.

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) - 07/31/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

88 / 98 → 90%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

76 / 80 → 95%

Weight

66 / 20-74 → 86%

Battery

87 / 95 → 92%

Display

87%

Games Performance

52 / 88 → 59%

Application Performance

86 / 92 → 93%

Temperature

87%

Noise

84 / 95 → 89%

Audio

82%

Camera

32 / 75 → 43%

Average

65%

85%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
75%

Repairability
45%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 40.4%

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 申克 XMG Evo 15 (M24) 笔记本电脑评测 - 拥有明亮显示屏和出色维护选项的德国超极本

Andreas Osthoff, 2024-08- 2 (Update: 2024-08- 2)

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparison
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 (min) Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28.1
...
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 SD X Elite X1E-84-100, Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS	866
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	866
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	880
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	882
HP Victus 16-r0076TX i5-13500HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	887
HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A R7 8845HS, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU	889
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	890
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	13398
Beelink SER8 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	13420
Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	13425
SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13430
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	13441
GMK NucBox K6 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	13455
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13455
...
(max) R7 9800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	77609

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 坚固的铝制外壳

尺寸比较

功能 - 雷电 4 和 USB 2.0

SD 读卡器

交流

网络摄像头

配件

维护

可持续性

输入设备 - 带数字键盘的大键盘

显示屏 - 240 赫兹的 IPS

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - Meteor Lake 和高达 96GB 内存

测试条件

处理器 - Core Ultra 7 155H

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

系统性能

DPC 延迟

大容量存储器

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡 - Intel Arc Graphics

Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS chart

排放 - 日常生活中的安静

噪音排放

温度

发言人

SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) audio analysis

Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 audio analysis

Medion S10 OLED audio analysis

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 audio analysis

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 audio analysis

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE audio analysis

能源管理

耗电量

Powr consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test

Power consumption with the external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 无 dGPU 的最佳多媒体笔记本之一

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison