工作站评测:Minisforum MS-01 首次亮相,配备英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H,但缺少专用显卡前置工作站
Minisforum 是微型 PC 市场上的知名品牌,拥有丰富的产品组合,可以应对各种可能发生的情况。这家来自远东的制造商迄今为止一直没有涉足工作站领域,而 Minisforum MS-01 将改变这一局面。该机型的最佳配置为 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H和 32 GB 内存以及 1 TB SSD,并在我们的实验室进行了严格测试。Minisforum MS-01 的售价为 979 欧元,虽然也可以作为裸机订购,但绝对不便宜。不过,如果没有内存和固态硬盘,价格仍为 799 欧元。如果不需要英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 的性能,这款紧凑型工作站还可以配备 英特尔酷睿 i5-12600H(499 欧元起)或 英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H(619 欧元起)。
在评测 Minisforum MS-01 之前,我们先来了解一些重要信息!
在我们的测试样品上进行的测试中,多次出现不可预知的死机现象。这些问题主要发生在较长的加载场景中,如 Cinebench R15 多循环。固态硬盘压力测试和 Adobe Premiere 基准测试有时也会出现问题。在这些测试中多次出现死机现象。当我们将处理器的功率限制降低到 35 瓦时,情况有所改善,但这导致 CPU 性能显著下降。为了进一步缩小问题范围,我们更换了内存、固态硬盘和电源装置等所有组件,但没有取得任何效果。最后,我们得出的结论是,这只能是英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 本身的问题。我们已通知制造商,以寻求解决方案。Minisforum 计划尽快给我们寄来另一个样品。因此,只有在我们查看了替换设备之后,才能做出最终评估。
如果有人在使用 Minisforum MS-01 时遇到类似问题,请告诉我们。如果有人拥有 Minisforum MS-01,但没有遇到类似问题,也欢迎告诉我们。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Memory | Weight | Height |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
81.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Minisforum MS-01 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 1.5 kg | 48 mm |
83.4 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 32768 MB | 768 g | 57 mm |
84.1 % | 04 / 2024 | Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 545 g | 37 mm |
82.6 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 417 g | 38 mm |
82.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 615 g | 55 mm |
81.7 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 i5-13500H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 16384 MB | 604 g | 55 mm |
79.5 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Maxtang MTN-FP750 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | 16384 MB | 601 g | 52 mm |
Minisforum MS-01 工作站详细介绍
外壳 - 金属和塑料材质,工业风外观
从外观上看,Minisforum MS-01 与制造商以前的任何机型都不相似。相反,它的外观让人想起联想的 ThinkCentre 或惠普的 Elite Mini-800 型号等工业设备。虽然正面和背面采用了塑料装饰,但使用的材料主要是金属。Minisforum MS-01 在桌面上占用的空间比其他传统的迷你 PC 要大得多。没有视觉亮点,也没有必要。在做工方面没有什么可抱怨的。所有部件都制作精良,配合完美。需要强调的是其极高的稳定性,不过这也会对重量造成影响。Minisforum MS-01 的重量为 1.5 千克,与其他微型电脑相比明显偏重。180 瓦电源装置的重量为 525 克。
设备 - PCIe x16 内部接口和 2x USB4 外部接口
可用端口分布在机身前后。Minisforum MS-01 有 7 个 USB 端口,其中两个支持慢速 2.0 标准。不过,这对于输入设备来说绰绰有余。毕竟,Minisforum MS-01 还有两个 USB4 端口可以加分,它们位于机身后部的中间位置。另一方面,制造商在 HDMI 端口的数量上也很节省,因为只有一个连接选项明显少于我们常见的迷你 PC。同时,还可以通过 USB4 连接屏幕,这意味着 Minisforum MS-01 可以同时控制三个屏幕。Minisforum MS-01 甚至原生支持 8K 显示屏。不过,您只能使用 30 Hz 的刷新率。作为一项特殊功能,Minisforum MS-01 具有物理 PCIe x16 接口,可提供原生 PCIe 4.0 x8 速度。这意味着这款小巧的电脑可以配备专用显卡。不过,由于机箱只能安装半高的显卡,因此外形尺寸大大限制了机型的选择。只能使用单插槽设计进行散热。
交流
在 Minisforum MS-01 中,我们发现了一种以前曾多次接触过的 Wi-Fi 模块。联发科技 Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 无线局域网模块与我们的测试样品结合使用,取得了始终如一的优异成绩。无论是使用 5 GHz 无线网络,还是使用 6 GHz 频率范围,我们的测试样品几乎总是名列前茅。华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 被用作测试路由器。除了无线连接,Minisforum MS-01 还提供了许多其他网络端口。MS-01 背面有两个 RJ45 插座。数据传输速率最高可达 2.5 GBit/s。此外,还可通过两个 SFP+ 接口加装其他网络适配器。
配件
Minisforum MS-01 的供货范围并不广泛。除了微型电脑本身,还包括 180 瓦电源装置和 HDMI 电缆。该设备还附带了一个用于安装 U.2 固态硬盘的适配器。
维护
Minisforum MS-01 在设备方面没有任何问题。设备本身甚至无需工具即可打开。这在现实中非常有效。因此,如果购买的是裸机,就不可避免地要安装内存和固态硬盘,而这在没有工具的情况下是不可能实现的。两个 SO-DIMM 插槽位于 CPU 风扇正下方,固态硬盘可以安装在底部。不过,必须拆下带有另一个风扇的宽金属盖。Minisforum MS-01 只能安装 PCIe 固态硬盘。即使是 U.2 SSD 也可以安装,但必须使用随附的适配器。
性能 - Intel Raptor Lake-H,14 个核心和 20 个线程
Minisforum MS-01 配有 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H顶级配置。此外,该机型还可配备 英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H,其性能可能几乎不会更差。不过,注重价格的买家也可以选择 英特尔酷睿 i5-12600H.这款系统芯片仍然拥有 12 个内核和 16 个线程,应该也能胜任大多数任务。
测试条件
在 Minisforum MS-01 的所有性能测试中,我们都使用了 "最高性能 "功率方案。根据我们的测试标准,只有在能量和噪音测量中出现偏差。 测试标准.处理器 PL1(60 瓦)和 PL2(80 瓦)的功率限制没有根据交付状态而改变。
处理器
Minisforum MS-01 配备了 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H的顶级配置。在性能方面,该 SoC 在我们的测试样本中表现出色,与 Geekom A7的 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS.
英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 共提供 14 个内核和 20 个线程。Minisforum 为该处理器设定了高达 80 瓦的短期功耗限制。在连续负载情况下,应达到 60 瓦。在这一点上,我们已经超越了自己,可以确认性能限制。
有关进一步的比较和基准,请参阅我们的CPU 比较表 。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A |
WinRAR - Result | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom A7 |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum MS-01 |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Acemagic F2A |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Minisforum MS-01 |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Minisforum MS-01 |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 |
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Average of class Mini PC | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Average of class Mini PC (646 - 51004, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Average of class Mini PC (3857 - 214250, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Average of class Mini PC (260 - 9399, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (8172 - 184747, n=119, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Geekom A7 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Average of class Mini PC (408 - 29064, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Average of class Mini PC (1987 - 113499, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (3691 - 325960, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (74.9 - 2039, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Average of class Mini PC (350 - 26952, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (4408 - 50500, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 |
关于 Cinebench R15 多回路的 Minisforum MS-01
我们的测试系统仅在 CPU 风扇转速达到最大值的情况下运行了 Cinebench R15 连续循环。不过,从单项结果可以看出,性能损失是无法避免的。最终,Minisforum MS-01 的排名与 Geekom A7 差不多。
记录的遥测数据显示,两个 P 核心的温度明显升高,超过了 90 °C。尽管风扇全速运转,但 SoC 仍无法在较低温度下运行,尽管移动处理器一般都能承受高温。不过,我们也可以看到,80 瓦和 60 瓦的功率限制已经达到并得到遵守。
系统性能
系统整体性能基本良好。英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 和 DDR5 内存的组合特别有用,有助于 Minisforum MS-01 充分发挥处理器的性能,而不受其他限制。在 AIDA64 基准测试中,内存性能也取得了优异的成绩。
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Average of class Mini PC (6481 - 89287, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Average of class Mini PC (6914 - 99171, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Average of class Mini PC (6862 - 98583, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
我们已经记录了在 Edge 浏览器中打开多个标签页时延迟增加的情况,在播放 4K 测试视频时,延迟又略有增加。使用 Prime95 进行的简短负载测试并未导致延迟进一步增加。相比之下,我们的测试样本仍然表现出色,稳居第二。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
Minisforum MS-01 可以安装各种不同的固态硬盘。不过,需要注意的是,这些固态硬盘必须是 NVMe 固态硬盘。MS-01 在外形尺寸方面也有优势,除了 80 毫米的标准长度外,还可以安装 110 毫米的固态硬盘。不过,较短的固态硬盘无法安装,或者更准确地说,无法连接。操作系统安装在金士顿的 1 TB SSD 上。固态硬盘的连接并不符合技术上的要求。这会影响传输速率,但这在日常使用中几乎不成问题。
我们对连续读取性能的测量结果表明,内置冷却装置无法保证最佳的冷却效果。性能总是会明显下降,但这只是短暂的。如果你想把事情做到极致,不想在系统中安装专用显卡,Minisforum MS-01 甚至可以配备总共四个大容量存储设备。我们进行了测试,在系统中安装了英特尔固态硬盘 DC P4618 PCIe 3.1 x8。
有关进一步的比较和基准,请参阅我们的比较表 。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Average of class Mini PC | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
在 Minisforum MS-01 中,广泛使用的 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 处理 3D 计算和图像输出。与较新的型号(又称 Intel Arc8)相比,我们测试样本中的旧型号落后了。不过,在某些情况下,Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 可以与 Acemagic F2A 中所谓的更快型号保持相对较好的速度,甚至超过它。
如果我们此时再把它用作工作站,我们就会问自己,为什么制造商不直接使用专用显卡。为了说明与 NvidiaGeForce RTX A2000 笔记本电脑 GPU 的性能对比,我们将其纳入了对比图形中。与该图形加速器结合使用,3D 性能将大幅提升。在针对专业显卡使用进行优化的渲染测试中,性能有了大幅提升。
有关进一步的比较和基准测试,请参阅我们的GPU 比较表 。
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (11.3 - 20, n=19) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (11.7 - 21.7, n=19) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom A7 |
Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1560 - 4958, n=11) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 |
Minisforum MS-01, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H | Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 7 155H | Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900H | Geekom A7, AMD Radeon 780M R9 7940HS | Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900HK | Minisforum Venus Series NPB5, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs i5-13500H | Maxtang MTN-FP750, AMD Radeon 680M R7 7735HS | Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECviewperf 12 | 7% | -19% | 601% | -17% | -24% | 7% | 457% | 362% | |
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05) | 46.7 | 49.8 7% | 40.1 -14% | 84.7 81% | 40.2 -14% | 41.5 -11% | 46.9 0% | 75.4 ? 61% | |
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) | 41.7 | 48.2 16% | 37.1 -11% | 89 113% | 35.9 -14% | 31 -26% | 51.5 24% | 134.9 ? 224% | 64.2 ? 54% |
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) | 30 | 23.1 -23% | 26.9 -10% | 55.4 85% | 27.7 -8% | 23.4 -22% | 33.2 11% | 116.2 ? 287% | 37 ? 23% |
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01) | 0.5 | 0.91 82% | 0.4 -20% | 20.7 4040% | 0.4 -20% | 0.35 -30% | 10.7 ? 2040% | 13.3 ? 2560% | |
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) | 51.9 | 54.9 6% | 38.3 -26% | 69.7 34% | 39.8 -23% | 35.9 -31% | 45.2 -13% | 96 ? 85% | 64 ? 23% |
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) | 14.5 | 16.9 17% | 11.8 -19% | 60.5 317% | 12.2 -16% | 8.44 -42% | 17.9 23% | 45 ? 210% | 28.5 ? 97% |
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) | 24.8 | 18.2 -27% | 16.6 -33% | 30.3 22% | 17.4 -30% | 20.4 -18% | 17.5 -29% | 70 ? 182% | 35.3 ? 42% |
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) | 53.1 | 42.7 -20% | 45.3 -15% | 116 118% | 47.3 -11% | 46.1 -13% | 72.1 36% | 142.1 ? 168% | 72.4 ? 36% |
SPECviewperf 13 | 5% | -14% | 157% | -14% | -27% | 33% | 266% | 89% | |
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) | 46.5 | 46.4 0% | 40.1 -14% | 83.9 80% | 39.9 -14% | 41.5 -11% | 48.3 4% | 139.4 ? 200% | 74.8 ? 61% |
Catia (catia-05) | 58.9 | 71.6 22% | 51.3 -13% | 130 121% | 51.6 -12% | 44.8 -24% | 73.9 25% | 205 ? 248% | 91.4 ? 55% |
Creo (creo-02) | 46.2 | 29.6 -36% | 41.1 -11% | 93.4 102% | 40.2 -13% | 37.1 -20% | 44.9 -3% | 165.1 ? 257% | 73 ? 58% |
Energy (energy-02) | 4.72 | 5.69 21% | 4.5 -5% | 23.8 404% | 4.39 -7% | 2.03 -57% | 11.4 142% | 32.1 ? 580% | 17.7 ? 275% |
Maya (maya-05) | 58.4 | 59.5 2% | 47.5 -19% | 107 83% | 48.3 -17% | 46 -21% | 58.3 0% | 174.5 ? 199% | 97.5 ? 67% |
Medical (medical-02) | 15.8 | 29.7 88% | 14.4 -9% | 77.6 391% | 14.4 -9% | 7.92 -50% | 32.8 108% | 70.4 ? 346% | 37.6 ? 138% |
Showcase (showcase-02) | 25 | 18.2 -27% | 17.3 -31% | 25.4 2% | 17.3 -31% | 20.4 -18% | 17.4 -30% | 68 ? 172% | 35 ? 40% |
Solidworks (sw-04) | 63.7 | 44.8 -30% | 57.1 -10% | 109 71% | 57.4 -10% | 56 -12% | 72.9 14% | 144.6 ? 127% | 76.6 ? 20% |
SPECviewperf 2020 | 11% | -15% | 232% | -14% | -32% | 69% | 429% | 154% | |
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 2.72 | 5.05 86% | 3.49 28% | 11.1 308% | 3.48 28% | 1.37 -50% | 4.72 74% | 10.6 ? 290% | 7.85 ? 189% |
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 4.75 | 4.61 -3% | 3.05 -36% | 14.1 197% | 3 -37% | 1.18 -75% | 6.6 39% | 25.6 ? 439% | 11.3 ? 138% |
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 19.2 | 17.9 -7% | 14.8 -23% | 31.4 64% | 15.1 -21% | 13.6 -29% | 17.5 -9% | 55.5 ? 189% | 30.7 ? 60% |
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 9.99 | 10 0% | 7.78 -22% | 24.8 148% | 8.08 -19% | 7.41 -26% | 13.1 31% | 29.7 ? 197% | 18.6 ? 86% |
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 11.6 | 12.9 11% | 9.69 -16% | 20.9 80% | 9.78 -16% | 10.1 -13% | 9.26 -20% | 36 ? 210% | 22.5 ? 94% |
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 6.9 | 5.7 -17% | 6.29 -9% | 61.4 790% | 6.67 -3% | 6.71 -3% | 33 378% | 112.5 ? 1530% | 37.2 ? 439% |
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 34.1 | 35.4 4% | 23.9 -30% | 47 38% | 24.4 -28% | 23.6 -31% | 29.5 -13% | 83.5 ? 145% | 58.9 ? 73% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 8% /
7% | -16% /
-16% | 330% /
334% | -15% /
-15% | -28% /
-28% | 36% /
36% | 384% /
378% | 202% /
204% |
3DMark 05 Standard | 50056 points | |
3DMark 06 Score 1366x768 | 38453 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 33312 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 8500 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 179358 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 30468 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6105 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 3023 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2118 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
在我们测试的配置中,Minisforum MS-01 只能部分用作游戏系统。在我们测试的配置中,Minisforum MS-01 的 iGPU 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H的 iGPU 仍能将一些游戏以可玩的帧速率显示在屏幕上。使用 AMD Radeon 780MGeekom A7 采用的是 AMD Radeon 780M 显卡。如果你想在 Minisforum MS-01 上安装专用显卡,性能肯定会得到大幅提升。不过,首先必须找到一个可以容纳在设备中的合适型号。目前的图形处理器型号有 英特尔 Arc A380可以满足要求。为了粗略估算与英特尔 Arc A380 的组合性能,我们将其纳入了对比概览。除此之外,您还可以绕道通过 USB4 使用外置显卡。
The Witcher 3 | |
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Sparkle Intel Arc A380 Elf | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Sparkle Intel Arc A380 Elf | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 |
Borderlands 3 | |
1280x720 Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) | |
Sparkle Intel Arc A380 Elf | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Overall Quality (DX11) | |
Sparkle Intel Arc A380 Elf | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
GTA V | |
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
Sparkle Intel Arc A380 Elf | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
Geekom A7 | |
Sparkle Intel Arc A380 Elf | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
Sparkle Intel Arc A380 Elf | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | |
Sparkle Intel Arc A380 Elf | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
F1 2021 | |
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset | |
Sparkle Intel Arc A380 Elf | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Sparkle Intel Arc A380 Elf | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12) | |
Sparkle Intel Arc A380 Elf | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
Sparkle Intel Arc A380 Elf | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Witcher 3 FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 166.4 | 149.3 | 31.1 | 12.5 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 117.2 | 77.8 | 43 | 19.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 128.6 | 94.5 | 80.8 | 70.6 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 56.3 | 31.2 | 21.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 65.5 | 48.3 | 40.7 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 75 | 39 | 35 | 33 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 115.1 | 51.4 | 39.8 | 31.7 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 68.7 | 32.4 | 30.3 | 25.7 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 69 | 38 | 36 | 33 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 45.8 | 23.8 | 17.1 | 13.2 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 67.2 | 30.9 | 18.9 | 14 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 109.6 | 57.5 | 44.4 | 28 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 129.9 | 64.9 | 50.8 | 34.4 |
God of War (2022) | 26.4 | 23 | 18.4 | 13.6 |
GRID Legends (2022) | 66.2 | 49.3 | 36.7 | 33.2 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 37.5 | 29.5 | 18.2 | 14.2 |
F1 22 (2022) | 57.2 | 52.3 | 37.1 | 28 |
F1 23 (2023) | 53.7 | 48.6 | 33.3 | 25 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 22.5 | 17.7 | 15 | 13.1 |
Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 87.5 | 60.2 | 41.6 | 36.7 |
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 178 | 124.2 | 115.8 |
Minisforum MS-01 与 Razer Core X 的性能测试
如果您想为 Minisforum MS-01 配备一个 eGPU,而不是直接在设备上安装一个合适的型号,您可以在这里了解性能的预期提升。我们仔细观察了 Minisforum MS-01 与 Razer Core X 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 的组合。与竞争对手相比,我们的测试样品在这一点上表现出色。我们的结果还显示,英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 与 Razer Core X 的组合性能明显优于采用 AMD 处理器的对比设备。
这些测试仅代表使用外置显卡时的可能性能。这些结果不会影响本测试的总体评分。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Sky Diver Graphics | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Unigine Superposition | |
1280x720 720p Low | |
Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1920x1080 1080p High | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
3840x2160 4k Optimized | |
Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
7680x4320 8k Optimized | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Extreme Preset DX11 | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
ComputeMark v2.1 | |
1024x600 Normal, Score | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Acemagic AM18 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 186.2 | 184.2 | 177.4 | 111.8 | 96.1 | 103.5 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 317 | 213 | 155 | 76.2 | 64.9 | 72.7 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 202 | 167.4 | 157.5 | 144.6 | 107 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 205 | 146.8 | 99.6 | 77.9 | 49 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 168.4 | 150.4 | 116.4 | 106.7 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 185 | 151 | 139 | 131 | 101 | 59 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 231 | 174.9 | 168 | 159.9 | 131.8 | 83.8 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 183.7 | 115.4 | 109.9 | 101.6 | 80.8 | 50.3 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 160 | 134 | 127 | 115 | 98 | 61 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 147.8 | 93.6 | 70.9 | 53.6 | 46.5 | 33.9 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 184.1 | 143 | 108 | 86 | 65.3 | 38.5 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 223 | 136.2 | 135.8 | 107.2 | 92.5 | 61.5 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 147.6 | 115.8 | 68.9 | 54.5 | 51 | 42.9 |
God of War (2022) | 113 | 100.9 | 85.1 | 67.4 | 58.3 | 40.9 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 180 | 140.9 | 101.1 | 81.7 | 62 | 36 |
F1 22 (2022) | 63.1 | 57.5 | 44.1 | 28.5 | 27.5 | 19.9 |
F1 23 (2023) | 70.3 | 71 | 56.9 | 36 | 32.6 | 17.4 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 91.7 | 81.5 | 71.6 | 64.6 | 44.6 | 22.4 |
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 88 | 82 | 78 | 60 | 55 | 38 |
Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 334.2 | 179 | 104.6 | 77.3 | 62.7 | 39.2 |
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 67 | 64 | 57 | 45 | 32 |
排放--遗憾的是不太经济
噪音排放
如果查看一下散热装置,很快就会发现风扇对于所安装的 CPU 来说太小了,必须高速运转才能通过散热器吹出足够的新鲜空气。因此,在负载情况下运行时会产生噪音。尽管如此,该设备在空闲时还是相对安静的。33.7 至 34.7 分贝(A)的噪音水平与 Geekom A7.在负载情况下,它的声音会变得相当大,我们的测试样本与 Acemagic F2A的测试结果类似。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 33.7 / 33.9 / 34.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 47.7 / 49.1 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.4 dB(A) |
Minisforum MS-01 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 i5-13500H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | Maxtang MTN-FP750 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 12% | 11% | 5% | 9% | 13% | 15% | |
off / environment * | 24.4 | 24.9 -2% | 25.4 -4% | 25.4 -4% | 25.4 -4% | 25.1 -3% | 25 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 33.7 | 25.4 25% | 28 17% | 33.3 1% | 27.5 18% | 27.8 18% | 25.3 25% |
Idle Average * | 33.9 | 25.7 24% | 28.1 17% | 33.6 1% | 28 17% | 27.8 18% | 25.3 25% |
Idle Maximum * | 34.7 | 25.7 26% | 28.5 18% | 33.7 3% | 33 5% | 27.9 20% | 25.4 27% |
Load Average * | 47.7 | 47.8 -0% | 39.6 17% | 43.3 9% | 42.8 10% | 38.9 18% | 45.1 5% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.9 | 45.23 8% | 47.2 3% | 43.2 12% | 44.5 9% | ||
Load Maximum * | 49.1 | 49 -0% | 44.2 10% | 43.3 12% | 44.9 9% | 45.8 7% | 45.3 8% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Minisforum MS-01 的外壳在空载和负载情况下都比较凉爽。温度远低于 40 °C,没有什么可抱怨的。然而,处理器则完全不同:在 FurMark 压力测试中,处理器的最高温度达到了 101 °C。由于开头提到的问题,我们将在收到替换的测试样品后立即再次对这部分进行测试。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.
耗电量
Minisforum MS-01 并不经济。即使在空闲状态下,我们记录的数值也相当高,远高于大多数微型 PC 的平均值。在平均负载下,能源需求攀升至 87 瓦,尽管峰值时达到了 123.3 瓦。与竞争对手相比,我们可以看到 Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 也达到了类似的数值。乍一看,附带的 180 瓦电源装置似乎过大。我们不应忽视 Minisforum MS-01 配备专用显卡的可能性,这意味着 180 瓦电源有其存在的理由。
Off / Standby | 2.1 / 2.4 Watt |
Idle | 14.4 / 16.1 / 25.5 Watt |
Load |
87.3 / 123.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Minisforum MS-01 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 i5-13500H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | Maxtang MTN-FP750 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 33% | 41% | 52% | 19% | 23% | 51% | 52% | 30% | |
Idle Minimum * | 14.4 | 9.1 37% | 5.7 60% | 3.8 74% | 12.1 16% | 8.4 42% | 7 51% | 5.34 ? 63% | 9.69 ? 33% |
Idle Average * | 16.1 | 10.3 36% | 9.5 41% | 4.8 70% | 13.2 18% | 11.3 30% | 8.1 50% | 8.55 ? 47% | 11.9 ? 26% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.5 | 14.4 44% | 16.5 35% | 6.5 75% | 14.1 45% | 14.5 43% | 8.4 67% | 10.8 ? 58% | 15.2 ? 40% |
Load Average * | 87.3 | 54.9 37% | 53.3 39% | 71.9 18% | 82.9 5% | 70 20% | 54.2 38% | 45.3 ? 48% | 59 ? 32% |
Load Maximum * | 123.3 | 110.4 10% | 87.8 29% | 94.7 23% | 106.8 13% | 149 -21% | 61.4 50% | 67.5 ? 45% | 100.5 ? 18% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption with external monitor
Power consumption with external monitor
Pros
Cons
结论:功能强大,性能高于平均水平
Minisforum MS-01 在外观上与大多数微型电脑截然不同,但这并不是一件坏事。工业化的外观清楚地表明它是一款工作设备。在性能方面,Minisforum MS-01 配备的 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H提供了充足的动力,也可以使用。预定义的功率限制确保了高性能,而 AMD 目前的顶级机型在这方面的速度并不明显。由于噪音的排放,我们希望能有一个更强大的冷却装置。
众多的连接选项为各种应用提供了可能,这是一个积极的亮点。两个 USB4 端口可能是 Minisforum MS-01 最重要的接口,但 Mini-PC 还有许多内部连接选项。目前,PCIe x16 物理接口是这种紧凑型设计的独特之处。因此,可以安装专用显卡。不过,要找到合适的型号还需要大量工作。
Minisforum MS-01 是一款功能强大的工作站,只要有合适的配件,就有成为工作站的潜力。
我们不会把 Minisforum MS-01 说成是一款纯粹的工作站,因为我们测试的是这款机型。仅就性能而言,它与其他面向消费者的微型 PC 相比并无太大优势。我们认为,专业图形解决方案才是更明显地突出自身优势的正确方式。遗憾的是,Minisforum 本身并没有提供合适的专用显卡型号。
最后,让我们看看购买价格,因为 Minisforum MS-01 979 欧元的价格并不便宜。许多竞争对手的价格要便宜得多,而且在某些情况下功能也更强大。不过,Minisforum MS-01 在使用选项方面具有其他迷你电脑所不具备的特殊优势。
在整个测试期间,我们不得不面对大量的稳定性问题。我们在评测开始时已经指出了测试样本的问题。有些测试多次出现突然崩溃的情况,导致最终用户无法在这种状态下正常运行。由于这个问题,我们暂时没有给出最终评分,一旦制造商给我们寄来替换设备,我们将再次对此事进行调查。
价格和供应情况
您可以直接购买 Minisforum MS-01。购买。另外,亚马逊也提供 Minisforum MS-01 的一些变体,价格从 580 美元起。
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.