OnePlus 12R 5G 智能手机评测：摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 和 Nothing Phone 的理想替代品 (2)

Name: OnePlus 12R 5G
Brand: OnePlus

能力与妥协并存。

OnePlus 推出的 OnePlus 12R 在理想与便捷之间实现了微妙的平衡。OnePlus 12R 采用骁龙 8 代 2 SoC 处理器，配备 10 位 ProXDR LTPO4 120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏、5000 万像素主镜头和 5500 毫安时电池，似乎拥有一个成功的秘诀。然而，OnePlus 为了凸显其旗舰杀手的地位和保持价格竞争力，还是少走了很多弯路。

Vaidyanathan Subramaniam, 👁 Vaidyanathan Subramaniam (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/15/2024 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...

OnePlus 5G ARM Android Smartphone

当 OnePlus 对 2024 年的骁龙 8 代 3-旗舰产品一加 12时，OnePlus 并没有放弃打造经济型旗舰设备的传统。今年的 OnePlus 12R 将继续努力践行该公司最初的 "旗舰杀手 "精神。

OnePlus 12R 配备了高通骁龙 8 代 2SoC 处理器，并采用了 OnePlus 12 和上一代机型的设计元素。我们的测试机配备了 16 GB LPDDR5X 内存和 256 GB UFS 3.1 存储空间，售价为 45,999 英镑（599 欧元或 599.99 美元）。

不过，12R 在发布时确实出现了沟通上的失误。OnePlus 最初宣布这款手机将配备 UFS 4.0 存储系统，引发了人们的兴奋，但后来才确认它实际上使用的是 UFS 3.0 存储系统。它实际上使用的是 UFS 3.1。此外，该手机的防水性能最初也引起了一些混淆，现在已经澄清为 IP64 级。

尽管出现了这些上市小插曲，但 OnePlus 12R 在智能手机生态系统中占据了一个重要的价格利基。让我们在这次评测中深入探讨它是否成功达到了目标。

Test device courtesy of OnePlus India

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

OnePlus 12R 5G (12 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 740

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

6.78 inch 19.8:9, 2780 x 1264 pixel 450 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, 10-bit ProXDR with LTPO 4, HBM/Peak brightness: 1600 / 4500 nits, Always-on display, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 228 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, Color temperature, Sensor core, OTG

Networking

Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, GSM: 850/900/1800/1900MHz, WCDMA: Bands 1/2/4/5/6/8/19, LTE-FDD: Bands 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/26/28/32/66, LTE-TDD: Bands 38/39/40/41, 5G NR: Bands n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n77/n78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 163.3 x 75.3

Battery

5500 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Dual-cell (2,750 mAh), Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 17.6 h

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix Sony IMX890 Wide (f/1.8, 1/1.56", 1 µm, 24 mm, 6P Lens, PDAF, OIS/EIS, 4K 60 fps) + 8 MP Sony IMX355 Ultra-wide (f/2.2, 1/4", 1.12 µm, 16 mm, 112°, Fixed focus, 1080p 30fps) + 2 MP OmniVision OV02B Macro 4 cm
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix Samsung ISOCELL S5K3P9 (f/2.4, 1 µm, 1/3", 24 mm, Fixed focus, 1080p 30 fps)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: Onscreen, Protective case, 100 W SuperVOOC Power Adapter, USB Type-A to Type-C cable, Pre-applied screen protector, SIM tray ejector, OxygenOS 14, 12 Months Warranty, SAR (India): 1.187 W/Kg (Head); 0.824 W/Kg (Body), Widevine CDM Security Level: L1, Camera2 API: LEVEL_3, IP64, fanless

Weight

207 g, Power Supply: 165 g

Price

599 EUR

Links

OnePlus homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.4 %	v8	07 / 2024	OnePlus 12R 5G SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	207 g	8.8 mm	6.78"	2780x1264
81.9 %	v8	07 / 2024	Google Pixel 8a Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7	188 g	8.9 mm	6.10"	2400x1080
89.1 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	OnePlus 11 5G SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	205 g	8.5 mm	6.70"	3216x1440
84.9 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Realme GT5 SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	205 g	8.9 mm	6.74"	2772x1240
89 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	09 / 2023	Sony Xperia 5 V SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	182 g	8.6 mm	6.10"	2520x1080
87.6 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	05 / 2024	Motorola Edge 50 Pro SD 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720	186 g	8.2 mm	6.70"	2712x1220
87.4 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	Nothing Phone (2) SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	201.2 g	8.6 mm	6.70"	2412x1080

注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息此处.

构建：配备大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 的全天候朋友

OnePlus 12R 有两种颜色可供选择：酷蓝（我们的机型）和铁灰。酷蓝机身采用玻璃黑色，容易沾染污渍和指纹。

手感并不过分滑手，但玻璃后壳意味着握持并不是最安全的。铁灰色版本采用磨砂玻璃背壳，具有更好的防指纹性能和相对更好的握持感。两种机型都采用了铝合金边框，给人一种高档的感觉。

背面有一个圆形的摄像头凸起，有点像一加 11尽管它比 OnePlus 12 上的更小，而且成像能力也不尽如人意。

弧形显示屏由康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 保护--与缺乏任何形式保护的 11R 相比，这是一个进步。

在日常使用中，OnePlus 12R 的重量为 207 克，感觉比 OnePlus 12 轻一些。这款智能手机的防护等级仅为 IP64，因此任何溅水都可能需要到服务中心进行处理。

尺寸比较

硬件带 OTG 和 UFS 3.1 存储功能的 USB 2.0

从外观上看，OnePlus 12R 沿用了 OnePlus 12 上的按键和警报滑块布局，包括红外爆破器。不过，为了降低成本，OnePlus 还是少走了一些弯路。

12R 没有 AirVOOC 无线充电功能，其 USB 端口支持 OTG，但使用较慢的 USB 2.0 协议。该机没有 microSD 扩展功能，所有存储设备均采用 UFS 3.1 标准。

软件：12R 只有三个主要的 OxygenOS 更新

OnePlus 12R 开箱即搭载基于Android 14 的 OxygenOS 14。安全补丁截至 2024 年 6 月。界面简洁，没有臃肿或广告。唯一预装的第三方应用程序是 Netflix，还有一些 OnePlus 自己的实用程序。

UI 功能与运行 OxygenOS 14 的其他设备一致，包括文件 Dock、智能侧边栏、锁屏上的智能建议以及实时应用程序（如支持的送餐服务）的始终在线显示。其他受欢迎的 QoL 功能包括灵活窗口、儿童模式和 Zen Space。

不过，OnePlus 12R 只提供三年的主要Android 更新和四年的 OxygenOS 安全补丁，不像 OnePlus 12 承诺四年的主要Android 更新。

对于那些对设备寿命有特殊要求的用户来说，这可能是一个争论点，尤其是因为三星的竞争手机提供至少四年的主要Android 更新，而谷歌则保证为Pixel 8a提供七年的支持。 Pixel 8a.

虽然更长的操作系统支持期总是受欢迎的，但四年的支持期也不算太寒酸，至少与一些竞争对手相比，如 Realme GT5等竞争对手相比，四年的支持期也不算太短。

连接性高速 Wi-Fi 6 和精确导航

OnePlus 12R 支持 Wi-Fi 7，但不支持 Wi-Fi 6E，这一点与它的旗舰机型很相似。不过，印度版本仅支持 Wi-Fi 6。

我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器在 1 米距离的清晰视线范围内进行测试，观察到传输速度高达 1.67 Gbps，表现出色且相当稳定。

接收吞吐量总体良好，但手机无法将其保持到测试结束。

Networking: iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | iperf3 receive AXE11000

Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000
OnePlus 11 5G Wi-Fi 7	1570 (1544^min - 1595^max) MBit/s +1%
OnePlus 12R 5G Wi-Fi 7	1547 (1423^min - 1670^max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7 (556 - 1801, n=48)	1011 MBit/s -35%
Realme GT5 Wi-Fi 7	1000 (722^min - 1023^max) MBit/s -35%
Sony Xperia 5 V Wi-Fi 6E	958 (934^min - 976^max) MBit/s -38%
Google Pixel 8a Wi-Fi 6E	856 (450^min - 907^max) MBit/s -45%
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=191, last 2 years)	729 MBit/s -53%

Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000
OnePlus 11 5G Wi-Fi 7	1875 (1845^min - 1926^max) MBit/s +58%
OnePlus 12R 5G Wi-Fi 7	1187 (489^min - 1374^max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7 (565 - 1875, n=48)	989 MBit/s -17%
Realme GT5 Wi-Fi 7	971 (917^min - 986^max) MBit/s -18%
Sony Xperia 5 V Wi-Fi 6E	838 (818^min - 850^max) MBit/s -29%
Google Pixel 8a Wi-Fi 6E	834 (780^min - 855^max) MBit/s -30%
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=189, last 2 years)	714 MBit/s -40%

OnePlus 12R 5G Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1546 (1423-1670)

Realme GT5 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1000 (722-1023)

OnePlus 12R 5G Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1166 (489-1374)

Realme GT5 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø967 (917-986)

OnePlus 12R 支持 L1 和 L5 GPS（GNSS）频段，还支持各种其他全球导航卫星系统（GNSS），包括伽利略（E1+E5a）、QZSS（L1+L5）、A-GPS、北斗（B1+B1C+B2a）、格罗纳斯（L1）和 NavIC（IRNSS L5）。还支持 SBAS，如 EGNOS 和 GAGAN。

该手机在室外接收卫星没有问题，但在室内接收时有些吃力。

12R 的道路导航性能与 Apple iPhone 15 Pro.它可以有效地转弯并沿着笔直的路径前进，而不会过多地穿过建筑物，其准确性甚至优于 OnePlus 12。

GNSS 对比：Apple iPhone 15 Pro vs. OnePlus 12R 5G

电话和通话质量：eSIM 仅适用于美国

OnePlus 12R 可以在双卡双待（DSDS）模式下使用两张实体 nano-SIM 卡，这意味着每次只能使用一张 SIM 卡。

12R 是一款全球手机，支持广泛的蜂窝频段。美国版本支持印度版本不支持的几个额外的 LTE 和 5G 频段，但这应该不会影响手机的全球漫游能力。

Jio True5G 网络的通话质量很好，听筒和扬声器的声音都很清晰。不过，即使开到最大音量，两个扬声器的音量似乎都有点低。

当前固件默认不提供 5G 语音（Vo5G 或 VoNR）功能，需要在 "开发者选项 "中强制提供。如果运营商不通过 5G SA 网络提供 VoNR，手机会切换到 VoLTE。

Google Phone 是默认拨号器。支持本机通话录音，并向所有与会者发出通知。

相机：5000 万像素索尼 IMX890 是唯一一款表现出色的相机

OnePlus 12R 的 1600 万像素自拍摄像头与 OnePlus 11 的基本相似，但 f/2.4 光圈更宽，26 毫米视野略窄。

在光线充足的情况下，自拍效果不错，但色彩显得暗淡无光。自拍照的细节还原良好，清晰度足够。

人像自拍效果不错，适合在社交媒体上分享，面部毛发等细节保存完好，但边缘的一些较精细的细节仍可能被剪切掉。自拍相机拍摄的视频上限为 1080p 30 fps。

12R 的主摄像头是我们在 OnePlus 11 上见过的 5000 万像素索尼 IMX890 摄像头。与 11R 的 120° 相比，800 万像素的索尼 IMX355 超广角摄像头只能提供 112° 的视场角。

最后，我们还有一个微不足道的 200 万像素微距传感器，但实际作用并不大。更糟糕的是，微距模式必须手动选择，因为主摄像头不会自动切换到微距模式。

现在是时候了，原始设备制造商应该停止仅仅为了在规格表上打勾或使相机驼峰看起来精致而采用低质量的 200 万像素微距传感器。更务实的做法是通过主摄像头本身提供自动微距模式。

相机应用程序是标准的 OnePlus 应用程序，界面没有任何惊喜。OnePlus 12R 没有继承大表哥哈苏的任何联合品牌，因此不提供哈苏大师或 XPan 模式。

不过，"专业 "模式确实提供了一些有用的功能，如直方图、对焦跟踪以及 RAW 和 JPEG 拍摄功能。与 OnePlus 12 不同的是，相机应用程序不会显示特定变焦模式的等效焦距。

5000 万像素的索尼 IMX890 可拍摄出令人印象深刻的照片，具有出色的细节和动态范围，没有明显的噪点或花边。相机默认将图像分级为 1250 万像素。如果要直接使用 5000 万像素相机，则必须在相机应用程序中手动选择高像素模式。

传感器内的 2 倍变焦也产生了良好的效果。虽然照片还没有达到 OnePlus 12 的水平--我们可以看到一些模糊和平滑的伪影--但对于大多数社交活动来说，它们还是可以完成任务的。

当 12R 的相机进一步扩展到 5 倍感光变焦时，就会感到吃力。虽然它们仍然可以使用，但仔细观察会发现过度柔化以及细节和色彩的损失。OnePlus 12 在这方面的表现要好得多。

只要不是像素偷窥，800 万像素索尼 IMX355 超广角摄像头拍摄的照片看起来还不错。镜头附近的细节得到了充分再现，但在画面较远的地方，该相机在正确解析细节方面却很吃力。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main Camera 2x Zoom 5x Zoom Ultra-wide 0.6x Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在最佳照明条件下，使用 ColorChecker Passport 进行测试时，OnePlus 12R 在某些色调上的色彩还原相当不错，尤其是肤色和中性色调。测试图中的细节还原良好。

在 1 勒克斯条件下，相机的曝光时间为 2.5 秒。在这种情况下会出现明显的色彩偏差，但测试图仍然清晰可辨。

配件和保修：典型的 OnePlus 展示

包装盒内含 100 W SuperVOOC 充电器、USB Type-A 转 Type-C 连接线、保护套和 Red Cable Club 会员资格。

在印度，OnePlus 12R 随附一个配色保护套、预贴屏幕保护膜、SIM 卡弹出工具、Red Cable Club 卡、品牌贴纸、手机孔密封贴纸、100 W SuperVOOC 电源适配器和 USB Type-A 转 Type-C 连接线。国际机型可能不提供保护壳。

12R 在印度的保修期为一年。购买者可以选择延长 12 个月的保修期，价格为 99 英镑；或者选择 OnePlus Care，延长一年的保修期和两年的意外损坏保护，价格为 4,999 英镑。

输入设备和操作：响应式用户界面和 O 型触觉反馈

12R 配备了准确、灵敏的屏内光学指纹识别器。如果需要，还可以设置安全性较低的 2D 面部解锁。

ColorOS 的 O-Haptics 技术可提供可微调的自然反馈。12R 还采用了 12 的 Aqua Touch 技术，允许湿手使用屏幕，但具体情况可能会有所不同。

OnePlus 宣称触摸采样率为 1,000 Hz，这应该能带来反应灵敏的游戏体验。

显示屏LTPO4 AMOLED 面板，具有高达 360 Hz 的直流调光和杜比视界功能

OnePlus 12R 的显示屏与 12 基本相同，但分辨率更低，为 2780 x 1264。该手机使用 LTPO4 AMOLED 面板，可根据内容在 1 Hz 到 120 Hz 之间循环刷新。

OxygenOS 还允许设置特定应用程序的刷新率，但并非所有应用程序都能利用这一优势。例如，谷歌地图和默认照片应用的运行上限为 60 Hz，而 YouTube 可以达到 90 Hz。

12R 完全支持杜比视界（Dolby Vision）和 HDR10+，可以在 ProXDR（Ultra HDR）模式下显示动态范围更广的照片。

与 OnePlus 12 类似，12R 在高亮度模式（HBM）下的峰值亮度也可达到 1,600 尼特，在播放 HDR 内容时可达到 4,500 尼特。然而，这些数字实际上并不能实现。

在 APL 10 及更低的条件下，我们测得 HBM 模式下的最高亮度为 1,028 尼特，而 HDR 模式下仅为 985 尼特左右。即使使用 "开发者选项 "中的峰值亮度测试功能（使用 1%的 APL 窗口）进行测试，结果也是一样。

亮度水平仍然足以获得不错的 HDR 观看体验，但不要指望 OnePlus 12 在这方面的性能水平。


1028 cd/m²	1020 cd/m²	995 cd/m²
996 cd/m²	1020 cd/m²	997 cd/m²
995 cd/m²	1012 cd/m²	995 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3

Maximum: 1028 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1006.4 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1020 cd/m²
Contrast: 134211:1 (Black: 0.0076 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21

	OnePlus 12R 5G AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"	Google Pixel 8a AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"	OnePlus 11 5G AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.7"	Realme GT5 AMOLED, 2772x1240, 6.7"	Sony Xperia 5 V OLED, 2520x1080, 6.1"	Motorola Edge 50 Pro P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"	Nothing Phone (2) OLED, 2412x1080, 6.7"
Response Times		-15%	43%	24%	46%	183%	21%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	1.2 ?(0.71, 0.49)	2.83 ?(1.338, 1.494) -136%	2.2 ?(1.4, 0.8) -83%	1.37 ?(0.727, 0.6475) -14%	2.09 ?(0.9415, 1.146) -74%	1.6 ?(0.8, 0.8) -33%	1.2 ?(0.6, 0.6) -0%
Response Time Black / White *	12 ?(10, 2)	1.05 ?(0.4965, 0.5575) 91%	10.6 ?(9.2, 1.4) 12%	1.6 ?(0.8845, 0.7165) 87%	1.74 ?(0.854, 0.882) 85%	1.2 ?(0.6, 0.6) 90%	1.4 ?(0.7, 0.7) 88%
PWM Frequency	120.6 ?(100)	120 0%	361.61 ?(100) 200%	120 0%	274 127%	714 492%	90 -25%
Screen		-16%	-45%	-165%	-37%	-22%	-12%
Brightness middle	1020	1518 49%	470 -54%	1080 6%	889 -13%	1064 4%	951 -7%
Brightness	1006	1466 46%	470 -53%	1084 8%	898 -11%	1038 3%	948 -6%
Brightness Distribution	97	88 -9%	97 0%	92 -5%	97 0%	88 -9%	98 1%
Black Level *	0.0076
Contrast	134211
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.94	1.2 -28%	1.23 -31%	5 -432%	1.4 -49%	1.17 -24%	1 -6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	1.66	3.3 -99%	3.11 -87%	7.7 -364%	4.5 -171%	2.47 -49%	2.2 -33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.3	2 -54%	1.9 -46%	3.9 -200%	1 23%	2 -54%	1.6 -23%
Gamma	2.21 ^100%	2.2 ^100%	2.23 ^99%	2.03 ^108%	2.23 ^99%	2.238 ^98%	2.203 ^100%
CCT	6379 ^102%	6786 ^96%	6479 ^100%	7001 ^93%	6456 ^101%	6423 ^101%	6516 ^100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-16% / -16%	-1% / -16%	-71% / -102%	5% / -9%	81% / 47%	5% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

自然模式，默认色温（目标色彩空间：sRGB）

OnePlus 提供多种色彩模式供用户选择，其中 "自然 "模式最为逼真，而 "亮丽 "模式的色域最广。

自然 "模式开箱即能提供高度准确的色彩，灰度和 ColorChecker 的 Delta E 2000 值都非常低。

ColorChecker 平均 dE2000：0.94。最大 dE2000： 1.66

明亮模式，默认色温（目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）

与 "自然 "模式相比，切换到 "绚丽 "模式后，Delta E 2000 的数值明显上升。

ColorChecker 平均 dE2000: 3.09.最大 dE2000： 6.17

明亮模式，暖色温（色彩空间目标：DCI-P3）

应用暖色调色温可使 "亮丽 "模式下的 Delta E 2000 值达到更精确的色彩水平。

ColorChecker 平均 dE2000：2.37。最大 dE2000：3.15

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.71 ms rise
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.49 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

响应时间与我们之前在 OnePlus 12 上看到的类似，从 50% 灰色快速过渡到 80% 灰色。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120.6 Hz
Amplitude: 20 %

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 120.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 120.6 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

OnePlus 12R 在 33% 以上的所有亮度级别均使用 120 Hz 直流调光。在设置中切换 Ultra Anti-Flicker 可以将直流调光频率提高到 360 Hz。OnePlus 声称在低亮度下的 PWM 频率为 2,160 Hz，但我们无法通过测试确认这一数值。

更多信息请参阅我们的文章"为什么 PWM 如此令人头疼".您还可以参考我们的 PWM 排名表来比较各评测设备的 PWM。

12R 的显示屏没有出现时间抖动的迹象。

▶ load Youtube video

屏幕亮度高，有助于在户外清晰观看。可视角度相对稳定，在极端情况下不会出现亮度或色彩损失。

性能骁龙 8 代 2 没有惊喜

OnePlus 12R 配备了高通骁龙 8 代 2与 OnePlus 11 相似。骁龙 8 代 2 仍然是一款性能卓越的 SoC，可以提供旗舰级的性能。

OnePlus 默认会对 8 代 2 的性能进行节流。我们使用 "高性能 "模式让 SoC 充分发挥其性能，尤其是单核性能。

我们观察到，在默认模式下，Geekbench 5.5 的单核性能下降了 20%，而多核分数相对保持不变。在禁用高性能模式下运行 Geekbench 6.2 时也出现了类似的结果。这次，单核分数下降了 22%，但多核分数也下降了 14%。

正如预期的那样，CPU 的累积性能与 OnePlus 11 相同。虽然 OnePlus 12R 在 PCMark 测试中领先于 OnePlus 11，但后者在 CrossMark 中弥补了失分。

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
OnePlus 11 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	92.1 pt
OnePlus 12R 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	91.2 pt
Sony Xperia 5 V ^-1! Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	89.4 pt
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2	88.9 pt
Realme GT5 ^-1! Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	78.6 pt
Nothing Phone (2) ^-1! Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	78.6 pt
Google Pixel 8a ^-1! Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	75.1 pt
Average of class Smartphone	69.2 pt
Motorola Edge 50 Pro ^-2! Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	57.7 pt

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1521 Points +2%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	1497 Points +1%
OnePlus 11 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1493 Points 0%
OnePlus 12R 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1488 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1048 - 1574, n=20)	1455 Points -2%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	1267 Points -15%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1255 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)	1037 Points -30%
Multi-Core
OnePlus 11 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	5000 Points +4%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	4998 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4192 - 5243, n=20)	4918 Points +2%
OnePlus 12R 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	4813 Points
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	4654 Points -3%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	4045 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)	3464 Points -28%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	3366 Points -30%

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	2021 Points +1%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	2006 Points 0%
OnePlus 12R 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	2005 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1432 - 2104, n=17)	1926 Points -4%
OnePlus 11 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1906 Points -5%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1719 Points -14%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	1699 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)	1491 Points -26%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	1147 Points -43%
Multi-Core
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	5587 Points +5%
OnePlus 11 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	5385 Points +1%
OnePlus 12R 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	5344 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4255 - 5765, n=17)	5226 Points -2%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	5198 Points -3%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	4584 Points -14%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	4408 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)	4177 Points -22%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	3129 Points -41%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1111522 - 1322448, n=17)	1259049 Points +5%
OnePlus 11 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1238200 Points +3%
OnePlus 12R 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1200088 Points
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	1196960 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	932991 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)	810694 Points -32%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	671991 Points -44%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1607558 Points +5%
OnePlus 11 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1576711 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1398472 - 1607558, n=12)	1539082 Points +1%
OnePlus 12R 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1529637 Points
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years)	1307393 Points -15%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	1049981 Points -31%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	767395 Points -50%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	19748 Points +28%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	16612 Points +7%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	15925 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (11562 - 20394, n=24)	15817 Points +2%
OnePlus 12R 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	15464 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	15165 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)	13179 Points -15%
OnePlus 11 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	12471 Points -19%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	11565 Points -25%

CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus 11 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1356 Points +20%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	1170 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (778 - 1356, n=22)	1138 Points +1%
OnePlus 12R 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1132 Points
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1116 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)	920 Points -19%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	919 Points -19%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	759 Points -33%
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	Points -100%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus 11 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	9550 Points +1%
OnePlus 12R 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	9422 Points
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	8863 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (7354 - 9730, n=22)	8794 Points -7%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	7839 Points -17%
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	7354 Points -22%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	7088 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=157, last 2 years)	6460 Points -31%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	6028 Points -36%
System
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	14618 Points +7%
OnePlus 12R 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	13666 Points
OnePlus 11 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	13634 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (10786 - 15148, n=22)	13173 Points -4%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	12171 Points -11%
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	11352 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	11239 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=157, last 2 years)	10308 Points -25%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	7828 Points -43%
Memory
OnePlus 11 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	10821 Points +5%
OnePlus 12R 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	10307 Points
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	9837 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (6601 - 10834, n=22)	9479 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	9266 Points -10%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	8458 Points -18%
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	7836 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=157, last 2 years)	7016 Points -32%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	5719 Points -45%
Graphics
OnePlus 12R 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	30547 Points
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	29834 Points -2%
OnePlus 11 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	28957 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (22837 - 32334, n=22)	27375 Points -10%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	26141 Points -14%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	19110 Points -37%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	18837 Points -38%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=157, last 2 years)	17782 Points -42%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	13308 Points -56%
Web
OnePlus 11 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1947 Points +6%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1919 Points +5%
OnePlus 12R 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1832 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1077 - 2044, n=22)	1777 Points -3%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	1762 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	1743 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=157, last 2 years)	1574 Points -14%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	1543 Points -16%
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1192 Points -35%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	29654 Points +86%
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)	17814 Points +12%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	16413 Points +3%
OnePlus 12R 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	15972 Points
OnePlus 11 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	15882 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (11338 - 16880, n=21)	15142 Points -5%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13807 Points -14%
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	12656 Points -21%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	8985 Points -44%

在 GPU 方面，8 代 2 的 Adreno 740GPU 的表现符合预期，但落后于索尼 Xperia 5 V在 3DMark 和 GFXBench 的累计性能上落后 12%。

GPU Performance Rating: Percent
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

GPU Performance Rating
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	95.5 pt
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	84.5 pt
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	84.4 pt
Realme GT5 ^-3! Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	82.3 pt
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65.9 pt
Nothing Phone (2) ^-4! Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60.9 pt
Motorola Edge 50 Pro ^-4! Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	42.1 pt

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3713 Points
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3701 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3627 Points -2%
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3565 Points -4%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2538 Points -32%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2353 Points -37%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1451 Points -61%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3724 Points
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3716 Points 0%
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3675 Points -1%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3667 Points -2%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2754 Points -26%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2359 Points -37%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1474 Points -60%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14103 Points
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14053 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13993 Points -1%
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13987 Points -1%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8960 Points -36%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5434 Points -61%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6468 Points +6%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6268 Points +3%
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6091 Points
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3005 Points -51%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	25512 Points +1%
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25374 Points
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23181 Points -9%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14498 Points -43%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	15422 Points +4%
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14895 Points
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14492 Points -3%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7856 Points -47%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +98%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	116 fps +93%
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	490 fps
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	484 fps -1%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	476 fps -3%
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	465 fps -5%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	373 fps -24%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	349 fps -29%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	174 fps -64%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +98%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	78 fps +30%
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	321 fps +8%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	302 fps +2%
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	296 fps
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	292 fps -1%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	241 fps -19%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	211 fps -29%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	107 fps -64%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps +63%
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	60 fps 0%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	222 fps
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	221 fps 0%
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	221 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	205 fps -8%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	134 fps -40%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	117 fps -47%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	84 fps -62%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps +68%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps +25%
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps -2%
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58 fps -3%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	31 fps -48%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	129 fps +1%
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	128 fps 0%
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	128 fps
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps -8%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76 fps -41%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	74 fps -42%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87 fps +45%
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps -2%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps -2%
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	56 fps -7%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	27 fps -55%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	69 fps +1%
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	68 fps 0%
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	61 fps -10%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -38%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps -47%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps -66%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +98%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +35%
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps -33%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	181 fps +5%
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	175 fps +2%
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	172 fps
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	140 fps -19%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	113 fps -34%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	96 fps -44%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	57 fps -67%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	31 fps 0%
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	31 fps 0%
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -3%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps -35%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	16 fps -48%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps -65%

Basemark GPUScore

OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø41.4 (24.4-85.3)

OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø32.9 (11.2-91.3)

OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø39.1 (11.3-241)

OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø38.7 (14.4-64.6)

OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø18.6 (12.3-75.4)

OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø15.5 (9.48-86.5)

OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø17.8 (12.1-63)

OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø17 (10.6-77.5)

OnePlus 12R 在浏览器基准测试中表现优异，领先 OnePlus 11 和谷歌 Pixel 8a分别领先35%和50%。

Browser Performance Rating - Percent
OnePlus 12R 5G	91.8 pt
Sony Xperia 5 V	87.4 pt
Nothing Phone (2)	79.7 pt
OnePlus 11 5G	67.8 pt
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2	65.8 pt
Google Pixel 8a	61.1 pt
Motorola Edge 50 Pro	58.6 pt
Average of class Smartphone	55.8 pt
Realme GT5 ^-1!	28.4 pt

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	179.212 Points +3%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)	178.548 Points +2%
OnePlus 12R 5G (Chrome 126)	174.8 Points
OnePlus 11 5G (Chrome 112)	145.694 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.7 - 179.2, n=23)	133.1 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)	124.4 Points -29%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)	123.193 Points -30%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)	94.765 Points -46%
Realme GT5	67.947 Points -61%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus 12R 5G (Chrome 126)	215 runs/min
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	179 runs/min -17%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)	162 runs/min -25%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)	161 runs/min -25%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)	147 runs/min -32%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)	143.9 runs/min -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.9 - 225, n=18)	141.6 runs/min -34%
OnePlus 11 5G (Chrome 112)	126 runs/min -41%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
OnePlus 12R 5G (Chrome 126)	181 Points
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	171 Points -6%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)	147 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (28 - 183, n=22)	130.6 Points -28%
OnePlus 11 5G (Chrome 112)	120 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)	117.1 Points -35%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)	103 Points -43%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)	95 Points -48%
Realme GT5 (Realme Browser 40)	67 Points -63%

Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 12R 5G (Chrome 126)	63400 Points
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	61881 Points -2%
OnePlus 11 5G (Chrome 112)	54726 Points -14%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)	52931 Points -17%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)	46738 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (19870 - 65418, n=25)	45827 Points -28%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)	39130 Points -38%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points -39%
Realme GT5 (Realme Browser 40)	24563 Points -61%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Realme GT5 (Realme Browser 40)	1837.3 ms * -160%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * -115%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)	1150 ms * -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (602 - 1837, n=22)	1023 ms * -45%
OnePlus 11 5G (Chrome 112)	984.1 ms * -39%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)	886.7 ms * -25%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)	755.5 ms * -7%
OnePlus 12R 5G (Chrome 126)	707 ms *
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	705.9 ms * -0%

* ... smaller is better

12R 的 UFS 3.1 存储空间无法与 Realme GT5 或 OnePlus 11 相提并论，这两款手机都使用了 UFS 4.0 闪存。

尽管如此，同样使用 UFS 3.1 闪存的 Pixel 8a 在存储测试中还是比 12R 落后了 50%。

	OnePlus 12R 5G	Google Pixel 8a	OnePlus 11 5G	Realme GT5	Sony Xperia 5 V	Motorola Edge 50 Pro	Nothing Phone (2)	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-50%	40%	61%	-4%	-25%	-8%	-21%	-15%
Sequential Read 256KB	1806.24	1509.65 -16%	3249.41 80%	3475.6 92%	1812.23 0%	1023.6 -43%	1949.5 8%	1742 ?(950 - 2037, n=102) -4%	1882 ?(226 - 4512, n=197, last 2 years) 4%
Sequential Write 256KB	1606.11	255.31 -84%	2758.14 72%	3117.44 94%	1331.81 -17%	1025.9 -36%	1517.6 -6%	1160 ?(452 - 2004, n=102) -28%	1467 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=197, last 2 years) -9%
Random Read 4KB	347.65	165.98 -52%	379.42 9%	479.83 38%	359.71 3%	337 -3%	287.5 -17%	286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=102) -18%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=197, last 2 years) -20%
Random Write 4KB	476.88	243.82 -49%	470.17 -1%	577.13 21%	473.91 -1%	390.2 -18%	403.8 -15%	319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=103) -33%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=197, last 2 years) -35%

游戏：低设置下 90 帧/秒

在所有测试设置下，OnePlus 12R 在《PUBG Mobile》和《Genshin Impact》中都能提供不错的帧率，没有太多的节流。PUBG Mobile》在超 HDR 模式下最高帧数为 40 fps，而在流畅图形预设下则达到 90 fps。

Genshin Impact在任何测试预设中都没有提供 120 fps 选项，但即使在最高预设下，游戏也能以 60 fps 的速度流畅运行。

所有性能指标均使用GameBench应用程序。

OnePlus 12R 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.2.0: Ø89.2 (83-91)

OnePlus 12R 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.2.0: Ø59.2 (53-61)

OnePlus 12R 5G; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.2.0: Ø39.8 (37-41)

OnePlus 12R 5G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.7.0_23093867_23435602: Ø60.1 (57-61)

OnePlus 12R 5G; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 4.7.0_23093867_23435602: Ø60.1 (58-61)

OnePlus 12R 5G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.7.0_23093867_23435602: Ø60 (57-61)

12R 提供与 OnePlus 12 相同的 HyperBoost Engine 叠加功能，允许玩家调整和自定义游戏体验的许多方面。

排放物：低温速度蒸发室在负载下被推至极致

OnePlus 12R 采用了与 OnePlus 12 相同的 9,140 平方毫米双 Cryo-velocity 蒸汽腔。尽管散热面积很大，但在 3DMark Wild Life Stress 测试中，我们还是看到了高达 28% 的节流。

尽管如此，这款手机在 "Steel Nomad Light Stress "测试中却毫不逊色，比 Pixel 8a 高出 81%。

温度

当 CPU 和 GPU 都处于最大负载时，我们会观察到表面温度升高。不过，用户在日常使用中不太可能遇到这样的负载。

从上图中可以看出，即使在高设置下，游戏也相对不受限制。

Max. Load

Idle


43.6 °C	43.6 °C	37 °C
45.6 °C	44.2 °C	37.8 °C
45.4 °C	43.6 °C	38.2 °C

Maximum: 45.6 °C
Average: 42.1 °C


42.6 °C	40.8 °C	38.2 °C
39.2 °C	39.4 °C	37.4 °C
37.6 °C	38.2 °C	36.4 °C

Maximum: 42.6 °C
Average: 38.9 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Amprobe TMD-50 // Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Stress Test

3DMark: Wild Life Stress Test Stability | Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability

3DMark / Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	88.6 % +24%
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71.6 %
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60.2 % -16%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52 % -27%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51.4 % -28%
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	49 % -32%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.8 % +31%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87.3 % +15%
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75.7 %
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52.6 % -31%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51.3 % -32%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51.3 % -32%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98.1 %
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54.1 % -45%

OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø21.1 (16.6-22)

Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø9.87 (7.57-14.8)

OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø71.1 (57.4-80.2)

Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø33.9 (26-50.6)

OnePlus 12R 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø8.03 (7.94-8.09)

Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø5.33 (3.92-7.24)

发言人

12R 采用立体声扬声器设置，听筒还兼作扬声器。测得的 83.1 dB(A) 响度与 OnePlus 12 相似。

只要环境噪声不大，这个响度应该足够了。低音响应不足是可以理解的，但中高音重现良好。

蓝牙 5.3 和 USB Type-C 允许连接外部音频设备。支持的蓝牙音频编解码器包括 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+、LHDC 和 LDAC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

OnePlus 12R 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理：尽管空闲功耗较高，但电池续航时间出色

耗电量

与 Xperia 5 V 和 Realme GT5 等其他骁龙 8 代 2 手机相比，OnePlus 12R 的空闲功耗略高。

尽管如此，最大负载下的功耗与 Realme GT5 和 OnePlus 11 相似。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.4 / 0.55 Watt
Idle	1.05 / 1.75 / 1.89 Watt
Load	7.9 / 11.36 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	OnePlus 12R 5G SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"	Google Pixel 8a Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"	OnePlus 11 5G SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.7"	Realme GT5 SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, AMOLED, 2772x1240, 6.7"	Sony Xperia 5 V SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, OLED, 2520x1080, 6.1"	Motorola Edge 50 Pro SD 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"	Nothing Phone (2) SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, OLED, 2412x1080, 6.7"	Average Qualcomm Adreno 740	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		9%	-20%	-1%	25%	27%	24%	-0%	16%
Idle Minimum *	1.05	0.92 12%	2.37 -126%	1.04 1%	0.79 25%	0.9 14%	0.9 14%	1.164 ?(0.44 - 3.4, n=31) -11%	0.882 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=157, last 2 years) 16%
Idle Average *	1.75	1.46 17%	1.61 8%	1.43 18%	1.08 38%	1.3 26%	1.1 37%	1.787 ?(0.69 - 7.18, n=31) -2%	1.448 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=157, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Maximum *	1.89	1.65 13%	1.79 5%	1.5 21%	1.12 41%	1.6 15%	1.4 26%	1.955 ?(0.83 - 8.22, n=31) -3%	1.603 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=157, last 2 years) 15%
Load Average *	7.9	7.96 -1%	6.78 14%	11.38 -44%	7.93 -0%	4.8 39%	5 37%	7.39 ?(2.61 - 15.8, n=31) 6%	6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=152, last 2 years) 17%
Load Maximum *	11.36	10.74 5%	11.53 -1%	11.47 -1%	8.78 23%	6.7 41%	10.4 8%	10.5 ?(4.57 - 18.1, n=31) 8%	9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=152, last 2 years) 13%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

OnePlus 12R 5G SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.9 (0.814-11.4)

Google Pixel 8a Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.29 (1.092-13.3)

OnePlus 12R 5G SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.782 (0.694-0.959)

Google Pixel 8a Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.923 (0.836-1.163)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

OnePlus 12R 5G SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.9 (10.1-11.2)

Google Pixel 8a Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.68 (5.85-9.37)

OnePlus 12R 5G SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.782 (0.694-0.959)

Google Pixel 8a Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.923 (0.836-1.163)

电池寿命

12R 的 5,500 毫安时电池比 OnePlus 11 的电池大 500 毫安时，有助于延长运行时间。

随机附送的 100 瓦 SuperVOOC 充电器可在约 26 分钟内充满 100% 的电池。遗憾的是，12R 没有提供 AirVOOC 无线充电或反向无线充电等功能。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		33h 30min
WiFi Websurfing		22h 16min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		7h 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		31h 40min

	OnePlus 12R 5G SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, Wh	Google Pixel 8a Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, Wh	OnePlus 11 5G SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, Wh	Realme GT5 SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, Wh	Sony Xperia 5 V SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, Wh	Motorola Edge 50 Pro SD 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, Wh	Nothing Phone (2) SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, Wh	Average of class Smartphone
Battery Runtime		-30%	-28%	-30%	-4%	-25%	-26%	-15%
Reader / Idle	2010	1803 -10%	1680 -16%		2788 39%	1895 -6%	1744 -13%	2253 ?(1160 - 14042, n=115, last 2 years) 12%
H.264	1900	1132 -40%	1380 -27%		1493 -21%	1120 -41%	1245 -34%	1312 ?(859 - 2321, n=114, last 2 years) -31%
WiFi v1.3	1336	796 -40%	803 -40%	939 -30%	952 -29%	979 -27%	909 -32%	991 ?(476 - 3244, n=209, last 2 years) -26%
Load		211	368		371	302	268	289 ?(73 - 427, n=112, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 显示屏采用大猩猩 Victus 2 玻璃，做工精良

+ 无臃肿感的 OxygenOS 体验和出色的触觉效果

+ 快速的 Wi-Fi 6 和精确的 GNSS

+ 5000 万像素索尼 IMX890 拍照效果极佳

+ 充满活力的 ProXDR 显示屏，具有高达 360 Hz 的直流调光和快速响应时间

+ 快速的骁龙 8 第二代处理器性能

+ 电池续航时间长

Cons

- IP64 等级

- 仅三年的 OxygenOS 功能更新

- USB 2.0 端口

- eSIM 和 Wi-Fi 7 在印度无法使用

- 没有长焦镜头，超广角效果一般，微距传感器毫无意义

- 持续负载下会出现骤降

- 闲置功耗较高

结论优秀的中高级车，过度的紧缩措施

不久前，OnePlus R 系列的表现一直很不尽如人意，似乎它的存在只是为了提醒自己和用户，他们还在追求旗舰机。然而，这次情况不同了。

OnePlus 12R 在大多数方面给人的感觉就像一款整体的中高端智能手机，这已经很不错了。你可以获得与 OnePlus 12 5G 几乎相同的显示效果，尽管分辨率较低，但这并不影响使用。

骁龙 8 代 2 SoC 对于 2024 年的智能手机来说并不逊色，在未来很长一段时间内都能很好地满足你的需求。OnePlus 12R 配备了功能强大的 5000 万像素主摄像头、出色的触觉、相当精确的导航和快速的 GtG 响应时间，绝对是同类产品中的佼佼者。

OnePlus 12R 试图将旗舰产品 OnePlus 12 的体验提炼到一个更容易接受的价位。在这个过程中，有几个明显的疏漏，但也保留了许多优点。"

然而，OnePlus 并没有施展魔法来实现这个价位，妥协是显而易见的。你只能获得同名的 IP64 等级，没有无线充电，超广角几乎报废，没有长焦变焦，微距传感器也毫无用处。其他一些折衷方案包括过时的 USB 2.0 传输和较慢的 UFS 3.1 存储（最初被谎称为 UFS 4.0）。

考虑到价格，OnePlus 12R 并非没有竞争对手。无 Nothing Phone (2)采用的是稍老的骁龙 8+ Gen 1 芯片，但其摄像头和一些附加功能要比 OnePlus 12R 出色得多。摩托罗拉摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro也在 SoC 方面有所吝啬，但在其他方面提供了出色的整体移动体验。

谷歌谷歌 Pixel 8a在这个价位上也不失为一个不错的选择，尤其是考虑到其标志性的第一方Android 体验和长期的功能更新支持。不过，你将不得不面对较小的屏幕和性能不足的芯片组。

或者，更明智的选择是购买一加 11的优惠价格。至少这样，你可以用几乎与 12R 相同的价格买到一款较旧但合适的旗舰级设备。

价格和供应情况

经过测试的 OnePlus 12R 可直接从Oneplus.in 购买。(₹45,999)、OnePlus DE(€599) 和OnePlus US(599.99美元）。

亚马逊印度站提供的 OnePlus 12R 8 GB / 128 GB 版本起价 39,999 ₹，16 GB / 256 GB SKU 起价 45,999₹。该价格可与多家银行、银行卡、免费 EMI 和现金返还优惠结合使用。

OnePlus 12R 也可在美国亚马逊无锁购买，8 GB / 128 GB 版本起价499.99 美元，16 GB / 256 GB 版本起价599.99 美元。

注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息此处.

OnePlus 12R 5G - 07/15/2024 v8
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam

Chassis

89%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

96%

Connectivity

53 / 69 → 77%

Weight

88%

Battery

93%

Display

92%

Games Performance

41 / 55 → 74%

Application Performance

70 / 85 → 83%

AI Performance

56%

Temperature

87%

Noise

100%

Audio

79 / 90 → 87%

Camera

81%

Average

71%

85%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
75%

Packaging
100%

Power Use
88.4%

Repairability
10%

Software Updates
66.7%

Total Sustainability Score: 56.7%

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Vaidyanathan Subramaniam - Managing Editor - 1965 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

contact me via: @Geeky_Vaidy

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 469273 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > OnePlus 12R 5G 智能手机评测：摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 和 Nothing Phone 的理想替代品 (2)

Vaidyanathan Subramaniam, 2024-07-15 (Update: 2024-08-15)

OnePlus 12R 5G 智能手机评测：摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro 和 Nothing Phone 的理想替代品 (2)

能力与妥协并存。

潜在的竞争对手比较

构建：配备大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 的全天候朋友

尺寸比较

硬件带 OTG 和 UFS 3.1 存储功能的 USB 2.0

软件：12R 只有三个主要的 OxygenOS 更新

连接性高速 Wi-Fi 6 和精确导航

电话和通话质量：eSIM 仅适用于美国

相机：5000 万像素索尼 IMX890 是唯一一款表现出色的相机

配件和保修：典型的 OnePlus 展示

输入设备和操作：响应式用户界面和 O 型触觉反馈

显示屏LTPO4 AMOLED 面板，具有高达 360 Hz 的直流调光和杜比视界功能

自然模式，默认色温（目标色彩空间：sRGB）

明亮模式，默认色温（目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）

明亮模式，暖色温（色彩空间目标：DCI-P3）

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能骁龙 8 代 2 没有惊喜

Basemark GPUScore

游戏：低设置下 90 帧/秒

排放物：低温速度蒸发室在负载下被推至极致

温度

3DMark Stress Test

发言人

OnePlus 12R 5G audio analysis

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max audio analysis

能源管理：尽管空闲功耗较高，但电池续航时间出色

耗电量

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论优秀的中高级车，过度的紧缩措施

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison