Notebookcheck Logo

OnePlus 11 5G智能手机评论：一款具有竞争力的骁龙8代2代旗舰，有一些不可忽视的怪癖

前进几步，后退几步。

一加11承诺以其骁龙8代SoC、改进的成像传感器、UFS 4.0存储和长期的操作系统更新，提供优质的旗舰级智能手机体验。然而，为了保持价格的竞争力，一加用一些退步来补充这些发展。
OnePlus Smartphone 5G Android
OnePlus 11 5G

去年的 OnePlus 10 Pro总的来说是一款不错的智能手机，但与它的前辈OnePlus 9 Pro相比，它在某些方面感觉有所欠缺。 一加9 Pro.今年的OnePlus 11，OnePlus已经完全放弃了 "专业 "的称号，但在大多数方面都赋予了该设备旗舰级的组件。

我们看到升级，如4纳米的 高通Snapdragon 8 Gen 2SoC，更高的内存和更快的存储选项，改进的5000万像素IMX890主传感器，以及具有微距能力的4800万像素IMX581传感器，仅举几例。

我们测试的OnePlus 11 5G智能手机采用泰坦黑颜色，拥有16GB的LPDDR5X内存和256GB的UFS 4.0存储。这一配置在印度市场上的售价为61,999英镑（800美元），在折扣和特别优惠之前。还有一个基本的变体，有8GB内存和128GB UFS 3.0存储，售价为56,999英镑（699美元）。

在这篇评论中，我们好好看看OnePlus 11 5G，看看它与其他竞争者的旗舰设备相比，表现如何。

OnePlus 11 5G (11 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 740
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
6.70 inch 20.1:9, 3216 x 1440 pixel 526 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED with LTPO3, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 219 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB Type-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass, Accu-spectrum Light-color identifier, Sensor Core, Flick-detect
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, LTE/LTE-A 4x4 MIMO Cat 20 DL/Cat 18 UL, LTE MIMO: LTE: B1, 3, 38, 39, 40, 41, WCDMA: B1, 2, 4, 5, 8, LTE-FDD: B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/1 9/20/26/28A/66 LTE-TDD: B34/38/39/40/41, 5G NR: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28A, N38, N40, N41, N66, N77, N78 GSM: 850/900/1800/1900 (No CDMA), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 163.1 x 74.1
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Dual-cell 2,500 mAh
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix IMX890 (f/1.8, 24 mm, 1/1.56", 1.0 µm) + 32 MP IMX709 (2x optical zoom, f/2.0, 48 mm, 1/1.56") + 48 MP IMX581 (f/2.2, 1/2.0"), Hasselblad Camera for Mobile, Dual LED flash, Multi Autofocus
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.4, 25mm, 1.0µm
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, Protective case, 100 W SuperVOOC Power Adapter, USB Type-A to Type-C cable, Pre-applied screen protector, SIM tray ejector, OxygenOS 13, 12 Months Warranty, SAR: 1.186 W/Kg (Head); 0.993 W/Kg (Body), fanless
Weight
205 g
Price
899 Euro
Links
OnePlus homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
89.1 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
OnePlus 11 5G
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		205 g8.5 mm6.70"3216x1440
88.1 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2022
OnePlus 10 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730		200.5 g8.6 mm6.70"3216x1440
91.1 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740		233 g8.9 mm6.80"3080x1440
90.3 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy S23+
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740		195 g7.6 mm6.60"2340x1080
89.2 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Xiaomi 13 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		229 g8.38 mm6.73"3200x1440
89.1 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Vivo X90 Pro
Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11		214.9 g9.3 mm6.78"2800x1260
90.3 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16, A16 GPU 5-Core		206 g7.85 mm6.10"2556x1179
90.2 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		239 g10.3 mm6.78"2448x1080

案例：环形摄像头的驼峰很突出

OnePlus 11 5G有两种颜色可供选择：哑光的泰坦黑（我们的版本）和光泽的永恒绿。泰坦黑的哑光表面有点滑，但基本上是防指纹的。

前面的显示面板由康宁大猩猩玻璃Victus保护，以最小的弧度无缝过渡到铬铝框架和背面。

完全密封的一体式结构看起来和感觉都很好。从10 Pro开始，OnePlus已经取消了公布IP等级。也就是说，OnePlus 11只有IP64等级--比10 Pro的IP68等级有所下降（至少在T-Mobile变体上）--所以它只能抵抗灰尘侵入和偶尔的飞溅。

带有突出的哈塞尔布兰品牌的圆形摄像头驼峰是OnePlus 11与前代产品的主要区别。

总的来说，尽管OnePlus 11比OnePlus 10 Pro重5克，但它的整体人体工程学设计还是很舒适的。

OnePlus 11 5G
OnePlus 11 5G
OnePlus 11 5G
OnePlus 11 5G
OnePlus 11 5G
OnePlus 11 5G

尺寸比较

❌
173 mm 77 mm 10.3 mm 239 g164.1 mm 74.5 mm 9.3 mm 214.9 g163.4 mm 78.1 mm 8.9 mm 233 g163.1 mm 74.1 mm 8.5 mm 205 g163 mm 73.9 mm 8.6 mm 200.5 g162.9 mm 74.6 mm 8.38 mm 229 g157.8 mm 76.2 mm 7.6 mm 195 g147.5 mm 71.5 mm 7.85 mm 206 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

硬件特征：没有无线充电和USB2.0降级

虽然10 Pro提供了50W的AirVOOC无线充电，并支持USB 3.2标准，但OnePlus 11 5G放弃了这些以保持价格竞争力。所提供的USB Type-C接口在内部只能达到USB 2.0的速度，但支持OTG功能。

在优点方面，OnePlus提供UFS 4.0内部存储。然而，这只在高端的256GB版本中提供。用户可以获得约219GB的自由空间。

外部布局与10 Pro没有太大区别。有趣的是，我们可以看到顶部框架上有一个额外的孔，很可能是作为一个扬声器通风口。

没有microSD存储扩展的范围。OnePlus尝试在10T中移除标志性的警报滑块。 10T.值得庆幸的是，滑块在11 5G中又回到了它的位置。

左：音量摇杆
左：音量摇杆
右边：警报滑块，电源按钮
右边：警报滑块，电源按钮
顶部：扬声器通风口，麦克风
顶部：扬声器通风口，麦克风
底部：扬声器、USB 2.0 Type-C、麦克风、SIM卡插槽
底部：扬声器、USB 2.0 Type-C、麦克风、SIM卡插槽

软件：OxygenOS 13系统有四年的功能更新

OnePlus 11配备了基于Android 13的OxygenOS 13，安全补丁截止到2023年3月。OnePlus最初将OxygenOS与Oppo的ColorOS合并的举动招致了很多人的反对，促使该公司，推翻了其决定。.

OxygenOS和ColorOS仍然来自一个共同的代码库，但OnePlus的软件感觉更轻，没有任何臃肿的软件。除了谷歌套件外，唯一预装的应用程序是Netflix和一些OnePlus应用程序，如笔记、社区、克隆手机和我的文件。

操作系统的操作很流畅，反应灵敏，没有可察觉的停顿或滞后，并提供大量的定制选项。这款智能手机通过了Widevine L1认证，可用于高分辨率DRM视频流。

对于OnePlus 11，该公司承诺将提供四年的功能更新和五年的安全补丁。这款手机谷歌Pixel 7系列则有三年的功能更新，因此OnePlus智能手机在这方面确实提供了一些价值。

通信和GNSS：快速、稳定的Wi-Fi 6吞吐量

OnePlus宣传支持Wi-Fi 7，但11 5G只能通过我们的参考华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000路由器识别并连接到5 GHz Wi-Fi 6 SSID。6E的SSID没有被检测到。

尽管如此，我们看到出色的Wi-Fi吞吐量，在整个测试过程中相当稳定。

虽然 Galaxy S23+和 S23 Ultra在发射测试中设法超越OnePlus 11，但后者在接收测试中以1.9Gbps左右的速度位居榜首。

OnePlus 11的印度版本总共支持26个LTE频段和13个5G NR频段。国际漫游不应该是一个问题，但该手机不支持mmWave频段，如n260。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Wi-Fi 6E
1810 (1724min - 1871max) MBit/s +15%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Wi-Fi 6E
1671 (801min - 1815max) MBit/s +6%
OnePlus 11 5G
Wi-Fi 7
1570 (1544min - 1595max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (556 - 1801, n=48)
1011 MBit/s -36%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
993 (972min - 1016max) MBit/s -37%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Wi-Fi 6E
946 (911min - 978max) MBit/s -40%
OnePlus 10 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
893 (835min - 941max) MBit/s -43%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
822 (409min - 835max) MBit/s -48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=191, last 2 years)
729 MBit/s -54%
Vivo X90 Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
227 (115min - 235max) MBit/s -86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
OnePlus 11 5G
Wi-Fi 7
1875 (1845min - 1926max) MBit/s
Vivo X90 Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
1787 (928min - 1850max) MBit/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Wi-Fi 6E
1623 (1491min - 1679max) MBit/s -13%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Wi-Fi 6E
1496 (1387min - 1627max) MBit/s -20%
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (565 - 1875, n=48)
989 MBit/s -47%
OnePlus 10 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
944 (859min - 952max) MBit/s -50%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Wi-Fi 6E
822 (748min - 844max) MBit/s -56%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
809 (780min - 871max) MBit/s -57%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
723 (365min - 741max) MBit/s -61%
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=189, last 2 years)
714 MBit/s -62%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
OnePlus 11 5G Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1569 (1544-1595)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1810 (1724-1871)
OnePlus 11 5G Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1875 (1845-1926)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1623 (1491-1679)
室内的GNSS精度
室内的GNSS精度
在户外的GNSS精度
在户外的GNSS精度
支持GPS卫星
支持GPS卫星

OnePlus 11支持多个定位系统，包括GPS（L1+L5）、GLONASS、Galileo（E1+E5a）、Beidou、A-GPS、QZSS和NavIC。

GPS跟踪基本上是在点上，但肯定可以更精确。

在与Apple iPhone 14 Pro 一起进行的试驾中，OnePlus 11记录的总距离为5.56公里，而iPhone 14 Pro为5.77公里。


导航：Apple iPhone 14 Pro
导航：Apple iPhone 14 Pro
导航：OnePlus 11 5G
导航：OnePlus 11 5G

电话和语音质量：首次支持eSIM

11 5G是第一款提供eSIM支持的OnePlus设备。这款手机支持双SIM双待。你可以使用两个物理纳米SIM卡的组合，或一个纳米SIM卡和一个eSIM卡。支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话。

在信号强度良好的AirTel 5G网络上，我们在通话时没有遇到任何问题。对话者的声音在听筒中听起来很自然，没有可察觉的失真。使用免提电话的通话也很清晰。

谷歌电话被作为默认的呼叫和联系人管理应用程序提供。该设备的印度版本提供了内置的通话录音，但通话中的所有各方都会预先被告知这一点。

照相机：与10 Pro相比，值得欢迎的改进

OnePlus 11在照片模式下的1600万像素自拍相机
OnePlus 11在照片模式下的1600万像素自拍相机
一加11的1600万像素自拍相机的人像模式
一加11的1600万像素自拍相机的人像模式

OnePlus 11的1600万像素IMX471自拍相机与10T中的装置完全相同，尽管10 Pro采用了3200万像素的IMX615。

在适当的照明条件下，自拍效果不错。图像中的细节很好，色彩还原度也很高。根据物体和背景场景的不同，边缘的精细度可能会有一些损失，但一般来说，虚化效果是相当有说服力的。

前置摄像头的硬件与OnePlus 8 Pro中的硬件基本相同。 一加8 Pro，甚至是OnePlus 7 Pro.OnePlus 11的装置有一个较低的f/2.5光圈（7 Pro的f/2.0），但受益于多年来软件图像处理的改进。

旧的传感器确实意味着自拍视频的上限是1080p 30 fps，而竞争对手已经开始提供至少4K 30 fps。

这次的后置摄像头设置带来了一些重要变化。5千万像素的IMX890传感器具有1/1.56英寸的传感器，宽大的f/1.8光圈和OIS，这与以前的OnePlus旗舰机提供更大的1/1.43英寸传感器不同。

OnePlus还将长焦变焦从10 Pro的3倍削减到11 5G的2倍。此外，超宽摄像头的视野从10 Pro的150°减少到115°。一些安慰来自于这样一个事实，即超广角相机现在支持微距静物，而不像10 Pro那样，它并不真正适合特写摄影。

从相机应用的布局、快门声和色彩输出中可以看出OnePlus正在进行的哈苏联系。

相机用户界面：照片
相机用户界面：照片
相机用户界面：视频
相机用户界面：视频
相机用户界面：专业照片
相机用户界面：专业照片
相机的用户界面：专业电影
相机的用户界面：专业电影

还有一个XPan模式，模拟哈苏XPan相机的65:24长宽比。

XPan模式
XPan模式
XPan模式的颜色
XPan模式的颜色
XPan模式单色
XPan模式单色
用超广角相机拍摄的微距
用超广角相机拍摄的微距

尽管规格明显降低，但OnePlus 11的照片比10 Pro的照片有明显的改善。主摄像头的照片具有良好的动态范围，没有可察觉的噪音或边缘伪影。除非明确以5千万像素拍摄，否则图像默认为12.5百万像素。

长焦和超广角相机也能产生与主相机相当的良好图像。细节保存得很好，颜色也表现得很好。当拍摄对象足够近时，超广角可以自动切换到微距模式。如果需要，可以禁用这一功能。

微距拍摄的结果很好，有很好的细节，尽管它们肯定可以使用一些改进的锐度。

用主摄像头拍摄的夜间模式照片在减少噪音和整体细节方面实际上相当不错。然而，一些更精细的方面没有得到很好的解决（如下面照片中的图书馆建筑名称），与iPhone 14 Pro相比，这是不可能的。 Apple iPhone 14 Pro和 三星Galaxy S23 Ultra.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main CameraTelephoto 2xTelephoto 2xUltra-wide 0.6xLow light

OnePlus 11在testchart和ColorChecker的捕获中表现良好。在正常光线和1勒克斯下，最大的颜色偏差Delta Es分别为9.75和20.46，都是用较浅的橙色阴影看到的。

ColorChecker
9.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
3 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 11 5G: 5.54 ∆E min: 1.67 - max: 9.75 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
20 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 11 5G: 14.05 ∆E min: 4.44 - max: 20.46 ∆E

配件和保修：包括100W SuperVOOC充电器

盒子里有一个100W的SuperVOOC充电器和一条USB Type-A转Type-C的电缆。
盒子里有一个100W的SuperVOOC充电器和一条USB Type-A转Type-C的电缆。

在盒子里，我们得到了一个100W的SuperVOOC充电器，带有USB Type-A到Type-C电缆，一个保护套，预涂的屏幕保护膜，SIM卡弹出工具，以及通常的文书工作。

其他配件，如OnePlus耳机的选择，包括 OnePlus Buds Pro 2等，可以单独购买。

在印度，OnePlus 11 5G享有一年的有限保修。在结账时，可以通过延长保修期和额外的保护计划来增加保修期。延长12个月的保修期将使您再花上999英镑。

或者，你可以选择12个月的意外损坏保护计划，价格为3799英镑，或2年的OnePlus护理计划，价格为5999英镑，涵盖了跌落和液体的意外损坏。还有一个为期一年的屏幕保护计划，售价2,799英镑。

输入设备和操作：高达1,000赫兹的触摸采样

OnePlus 11没有像Galaxy S23 Ultra那样提供超声波指纹识别器，但光学指纹识别器的速度和反应相当快。此外，还提供不太安全的2D面部解锁。

触觉效果很好，发音清晰。操作系统集成了Oppo的O-Haptics功能，对触觉反馈进行了精细的控制。

120赫兹的屏幕提供了高达1,000赫兹的触摸采样率（根据OnePlus的说法），这使其成为一个高度响应的用户界面和流畅的导航，没有打嗝。

Gboard是默认键盘
Gboard是默认键盘
O-Haptics
O-Haptics

显示屏：10位QHD+ LTPO3 AMOLED，带杜比视界和PWM功能

子像素矩阵
子像素矩阵

OnePlus 11采用6.7英寸20.1:9 QHD+ LTPO3 AMOLED显示屏，像素密度高达526 ppi，动态刷新率在1至120 Hz之间。

如果需要，刷新率可以手动限制到60赫兹，分辨率可以降低到FHD+。与OnePlus 10 Pro一样，当设备试图自动调整刷新率时，我们再次体验到停顿和抽搐。

OnePlus宣传支持Dolby Vision HDR，但在我们的测试中，亮度最高为479尼特--接近于额定的500尼特的典型值。该公司声称有1300尼特的峰值亮度，但我们在测量中无法确认这一点。我们可以在APL 10中用HDR内容测量到接近600尼特的亮度，但也就这样了。

472
cd/m²		464
cd/m²		471
cd/m²
479
cd/m²		470
cd/m²		469
cd/m²
469
cd/m²		469
cd/m²		465
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3
Maximum: 479 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 469.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.98 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 470 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.23 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
OnePlus 11 5G
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.7"		OnePlus 10 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 3080x1440, 6.8"		Samsung Galaxy S23+
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.6"		Xiaomi 13 Pro
OLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"		Vivo X90 Pro
AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.8"		Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.1"		Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
AMOLED, 2448x1080, 6.8"
Response Times
-196%
12%
36%
-15%
11%
25%
57%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2.2 ?(1.4, 0.8)
16 ?(5, 9)
-627%
2.43 ?(1.277, 1.155)
-10%
0.98 ?(0.493, 0.4875)
55%
3.64 ?(2.287, 1.352)
-65%
1.56
29%
1.81 ?(0.9645, 0.844)
18%
1.29 ?(0.6245, 0.6675)
41%
Response Time Black / White *
10.6 ?(9.2, 1.4)
6 ?(3, 3)
43%
2.07 ?(1.23, 0.8365)
80%
1.37 ?(0.7305, 0.635)
87%
1.47 ?(0.829, 0.6365)
86%
1.35 ?(0.6915, 0.6615)
87%
0.81 ?(0.409, 0.401)
92%
1.2 ?(0.6115, 0.5925)
89%
PWM Frequency
361.61 ?(100)
342.5
-5%
240
-34%
240
-34%
120
-67%
60
-83%
240
-34%
513
42%
Screen
40%
26%
14%
60%
48%
43%
43%
Brightness middle
470
793
69%
1117
138%
1128
140%
1230
162%
1018
117%
1046
123%
1010
115%
Brightness
470
776
65%
1133
141%
1136
142%
1244
165%
1026
118%
1049
123%
1016
116%
Brightness Distribution
97
95
-2%
97
0%
99
2%
94
-3%
93
-4%
98
1%
95
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.23
0.79
36%
2.2
-79%
2.7
-120%
1
19%
0.9
27%
1.2
2%
1.3
-6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.11
1.93
38%
3.9
-25%
4.5
-45%
2.8
10%
2.2
29%
3.1
-0%
2.5
20%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.9
1.3
32%
2.3
-21%
2.6
-37%
1.8
5%
1.9
-0%
1.7
11%
1.6
16%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.223 99%
2.37 93%
2.05 107%
2.24 98%
2.26 97%
2.19 100%
2.24 98%
CCT
6479 100%
6624 98%
6572 99%
6644 98%
6446 101%
6473 100%
6538 99%
6405 101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-78% / -39%
19% / 21%
25% / 21%
23% / 35%
30% / 36%
34% / 37%
50% / 48%

* ... smaller is better

自然模式，默认色温（色彩空间目标：sRGB）

OnePlus提供了几种颜色配置文件供用户选择，包括鲜艳、自然、电影和辉煌。

在我们使用X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3分光光度计和Portrait Displays的Calman Ultimate色彩校准软件进行的测试中，我们发现自然色彩配置文件提供了最佳的色彩准确性和最高的sRGB色域覆盖率。

灰度平均值dE2000: 1.9
灰度平均值dE2000: 1.9
sRGB色域：96.9%的覆盖率
sRGB色域：96.9%的覆盖率
ColorChecker 平均 dE2000: 1.23.最大dE2000: 3.11
ColorChecker 平均 dE2000: 1.23.最大dE2000: 3.11
饱和扫频 平均 dE2000: 0.85.最大dE2000: 2.35
饱和扫频 平均 dE2000: 0.85.最大dE2000: 2.35

辉煌模式，默认色温（色彩空间目标：DCI-P3）。

Brilliant提供了最广泛的色域，因此我们测量了99.2%的DCI-P3覆盖率。然而，Delta E值受到了相当大的打击，表明色彩准确性低。

灰度平均值dE2000：5.5
灰度平均值dE2000：5.5
DCI-P3色域：99.2%覆盖率
DCI-P3色域：99.2%覆盖率
ColorChecker 平均 dE2000: 4.33.最大dE2000: 8.04
ColorChecker 平均 dE2000: 4.33.最大dE2000: 8.04
饱和扫频 平均 dE2000: 4.37.最大dE2000: 8.05
饱和扫频 平均 dE2000: 4.37.最大dE2000: 8.05

暖色温的辉煌模式（色彩空间目标：DCI-P3）。

通过提高色温，可以在一定程度上抵消Brilliant中的巨大色彩偏差。这使得灰度的Delta E大大改善，达到2.6。ColorChecker的平均Delta E为3.42，比默认色温略有改善。

灰度平均值dE2000: 2.6
灰度平均值dE2000: 2.6
DCI-P3色域：99.2%覆盖率
DCI-P3色域：99.2%覆盖率
ColorChecker 平均 dE2000: 3.42.最大dE2000: 7.4
ColorChecker 平均 dE2000: 3.42.最大dE2000: 7.4
饱和扫频 平均 dE2000: 3.3.最大dE2000: 6.29
饱和扫频 平均 dE2000: 3.3.最大dE2000: 6.29

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
10.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 1.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.4 ms rise
↘ 0.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 361.61 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 361.61 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 361.61 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

响应时间似乎受PWM频率的影响。因此，我们不得不手动估算从黑到白和从50%灰到80%灰的上升和下降时间。

在这两种转换中，显示屏似乎很难在第一个脉冲中达到完全上升。

OnePlus在11 5G中没有提供直流调光模式。我们在所有测试的亮度水平上观察到PWM，如下图所示。

0%的亮度：257.48赫兹
0%的亮度：257.48赫兹
25%的亮度：257.29赫兹
25%的亮度：257.29赫兹
50%的亮度： 360.32赫兹
50%的亮度： 360.32赫兹
75%的亮度： 360.45赫兹
75%的亮度： 360.45赫兹
100%的亮度： 360.52赫兹
100%的亮度： 360.52赫兹

OnePlus 11的显示屏可以很好地用于户外观看。然而，我们已经看到，在阳光直射下，手机的亮度甚至更高。

AMOLED面板的可视角度很稳定，在极端情况下只有极少的亮度和色彩损失。

阳光下的户外观看
阳光下的户外观看
在树荫下的户外观赏
在树荫下的户外观赏
高视角的稳定性
高视角的稳定性

性能：高效能模式下的快速CPU性能

OnePlus旗舰机的另一次迭代意味着新的SoC，这次它是 骁龙8代2集成了一个 阿德雷诺740GPU。

OnePlus再次对CPU性能进行了开箱即用的节流，这对分数的负面影响高达20%。因此，除了在默认模式下进行的电池测试，我们在所有测试中都使用了高性能模式。

该模式下的整体CPU性能与我们迄今为止测试过的其他搭载骁龙8代的手机相当，包括专注于游戏的 华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate.OnePlus 11 5G还以令人信服的11%的优势领先于 小米13 Pro在累积的CPU基准测试中，一加11 5G还领先小米13 Pro 11%。

CPU Performance Rating | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.0 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Apple iPhone 14 Pro -6!
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
83.9 pt
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
 
82.4 pt
OnePlus 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
79.9 pt
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
79.6 pt
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
79.3 pt
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
77.8 pt
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
74.1 pt
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
72.3 pt
OnePlus 10 Pro -4!
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
70.3 pt
Average of class Smartphone
 
62.1 pt
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1878 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1563 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1556 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1499 Points 0%
OnePlus 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1493 Points
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1482 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1048 - 1574, n=20)
1455 Points -3%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1384 Points -7%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1211 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points -31%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
5538 Points +11%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5201 Points +4%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5182 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5082 Points +2%
OnePlus 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5000 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4192 - 5243, n=20)
4918 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
4906 Points -2%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
4232 Points -15%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3521 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points -31%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2531 Points +30%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2008 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1976 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1958 Points 0%
OnePlus 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1952 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1753 - 2008, n=10)
1925 Points -1%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1753 Points -10%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1669 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2008, n=41, last 2 years)
1257 Points -36%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
6460 Points +25%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5702 Points +10%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5422 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4255 - 5702, n=10)
5234 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5221 Points +1%
OnePlus 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5186 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
5043 Points -3%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
4232 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 5702, n=41, last 2 years)
3366 Points -35%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1322448 Points +7%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1277795 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1111522 - 1322448, n=17)
1259049 Points +2%
OnePlus 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1238200 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1226224 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1210674 Points -2%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1175789 Points -5%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1011412 Points -18%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
965593 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points -35%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
19783 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
15991 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11562 - 20394, n=24)
15817 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
15483 Points +24%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
14789 Points +19%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13827 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points +6%
OnePlus 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
12471 Points
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9765 Points -22%
CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1356 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1332 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1332 Points -2%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1265 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1226 Points -10%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1224 Points -10%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1169 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (778 - 1356, n=22)
1138 Points -16%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
932 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points -32%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
9550 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
9091 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (7354 - 9730, n=22)
8794 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8730 Points -9%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
8487 Points -11%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
7376 Points -23%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
6755 Points -29%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6584 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=157, last 2 years)
6460 Points -32%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
System
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
14275 Points +5%
OnePlus 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
13634 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
13602 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (10786 - 15148, n=22)
13173 Points -3%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
11793 Points -14%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
10786 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=157, last 2 years)
10308 Points -24%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9934 Points -27%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9767 Points -28%
Memory
OnePlus 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
10821 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (6601 - 10834, n=22)
9479 Points -12%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9245 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
9212 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
9075 Points -16%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
9052 Points -16%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
7232 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=157, last 2 years)
7016 Points -35%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5437 Points -50%
Graphics
OnePlus 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
28957 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
28497 Points -2%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
27698 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (22837 - 32334, n=22)
27375 Points -5%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
26616 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
25642 Points -11%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
22986 Points -21%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21678 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=157, last 2 years)
17782 Points -39%
Web
OnePlus 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1947 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1850 Points -5%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1826 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1808 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1077 - 2044, n=22)
1777 Points -9%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1665 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=157, last 2 years)
1574 Points -19%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1527 Points -22%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
843 Points -57%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
44483 Points +180%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
16511 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
16464 Points +4%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
16295 Points +3%
OnePlus 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
15882 Points
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15778 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11338 - 16880, n=21)
15142 Points -5%
AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
37396 Points +2708%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
31865 Points +2292%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (941 - 173234, n=18)
29790 Points +2136%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points +1801%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1362 Points +2%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1354 Points +2%
OnePlus 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1332 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1312 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1216 Points -9%

尽管OnePlus 11 5G在CPU测试中发布了令人印象深刻的结果，但它在GPU性能方面受到了一些挫折。OnePlus 11落后于ROG Phone 7 Ultimate 15%，但与Galaxy S23 Ultra的差距只有5%。

尽管如此，Adreno 740是一个非常有能力的GPU，在整体图形测试中比iPhone 14 Pro的A16 Bionic 5核GPU ，大幅领先16%就是证明。

GPU Performance Rating: Percent
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
GPU Performance Rating
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95.3 pt
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 pt
Xiaomi 13 Pro -3!
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86.2 pt
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85.8 pt
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.8 pt
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.3 pt
Apple iPhone 14 Pro -3!
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
70 pt
OnePlus 10 Pro -1!
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.8 pt
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3792 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3791 Points +2%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3784 Points +2%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3732 Points +1%
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3701 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3528 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
3265 Points -12%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2568 Points -31%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3877 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3843 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3829 Points +3%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3783 Points +2%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3773 Points +2%
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3716 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
3383 Points -9%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2637 Points -29%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14566 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14369 Points +2%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14093 Points 0%
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14053 Points
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13984 Points 0%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13492 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
12429 Points -12%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10282 Points -27%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7036 Points +9%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6894 Points +7%
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6468 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6293 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5777 Points -11%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3998 Points -38%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25512 Points
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25478 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24098 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23070 Points -10%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
22483 Points -12%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19283 Points -24%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16100 Points +4%
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15422 Points
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14878 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14487 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14136 Points -8%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10323 Points -33%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
145 fps +142%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
497 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
492 fps +2%
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
484 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
480 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
462 fps -5%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
451 fps -7%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
446 fps -8%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
368 fps -24%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
145 fps +142%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +98%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
331 fps +13%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
292 fps 0%
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
292 fps
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
291 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
278 fps -5%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
265 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
261 fps -11%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
204 fps -30%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
143 fps +138%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps +82%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
104 fps +73%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps +52%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
222 fps 0%
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
221 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
215 fps -3%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
207 fps -6%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
197 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
190 fps -14%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
131 fps -41%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps -49%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps +90%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps +83%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps +40%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps +12%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps +9%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +3%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps +3%
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
128 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
127 fps -1%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
126 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
123 fps -4%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
122 fps -5%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
114 fps -11%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps -30%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -45%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps +79%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps +46%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +7%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
59 fps +5%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps +2%
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -9%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps -7%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps -7%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps -10%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -25%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
44 fps -35%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps -37%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
123 fps +105%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +75%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps +40%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps +37%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
175 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
164 fps -6%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
163 fps -7%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
157 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
157 fps -10%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
133 fps -24%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps -37%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -42%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps 0%
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29 fps -6%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
28 fps -10%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -23%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
23 fps -26%

Basemark GPUScore

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø32.9 (11.2-91.3)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø34.7 (11.1-68.4)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 1.0.0 : Ø56.2 (34.8-71.5)
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø38.7 (14.4-64.6)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø39.5 (12.5-78.4)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.0 : Ø46.9 (28.5-59.2)
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø15.5 (9.48-86.5)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø16 (10.8-74.7)
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø17 (10.6-77.5)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø17.3 (9.4-80.7)

在浏览器基准测试中，iPhone 14 Pro以较大优势领先。一加11 5G发现自己落后于Galaxy S23+和小米13 Pro，但设法超越ROG Phone 7 Ultimate。

256GB的UFS 4.0存储空间提供了良好的读/写性能，与其他配备这种闪存的设备类似。

Browser Performance Rating | Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Browser Performance Rating - Percent
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
94.9 pt
Samsung Galaxy S23+
64.2 pt
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
61.8 pt
Xiaomi 13 Pro
55.2 pt
OnePlus 11 5G
53 pt
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
51.2 pt
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
48.6 pt
OnePlus 10 Pro -1!
48.1 pt
Average of class Smartphone
42 pt
Vivo X90 Pro
20.4 pt
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
281.762 Points +93%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)
176.612 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
159.102 Points +9%
OnePlus 11 5G (Chrome 112)
145.694 Points
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
137.873 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.7 - 179.2, n=23)
133.1 Points -9%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (Chrome 112.0.5615.48)
131.215 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points -15%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
101.23 Points -31%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
67.646 Points -54%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
375 runs/min +198%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)
150 runs/min +19%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min +14%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
143 runs/min +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.9 - 225, n=18)
141.6 runs/min +12%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
129.3 runs/min +3%
OnePlus 11 5G (Chrome 112)
126 runs/min
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
110.9 runs/min -12%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (Chrome 112.0.5615.48)
92 runs/min -27%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
60.2 runs/min -52%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
202 Points +68%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
157 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)
151 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 110)
145 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (28 - 183, n=22)
130.6 Points +9%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (Chrome 112.0.5615.48)
130 Points +8%
OnePlus 11 5G (Chrome 112)
120 Points
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points -2%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
66 Points -45%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
74261 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)
60423 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
59214 Points +8%
OnePlus 11 5G (Chrome 112)
54726 Points
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
49343 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (19870 - 65418, n=25)
45827 Points -16%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
42544 Points -22%
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (Chrome 112.0.5615.48)
42421 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points -30%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
21648 Points -60%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
1847.5 ms * -88%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (602 - 1837, n=22)
1023 ms * -4%
OnePlus 11 5G (Chrome 112)
984.1 ms *
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (Chrome 112.0.5615.48)
918.6 ms * +7%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
823.5 ms * +16%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)
699 ms * +29%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
690.6 ms * +30%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
685 ms * +30%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
475.3 ms * +52%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 11 5GOnePlus 10 ProSamsung Galaxy S23 UltraSamsung Galaxy S23+Xiaomi 13 ProVivo X90 ProAsus ROG Phone 7 UltimateAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-44%
-23%
-29%
6%
6%
15%
0%
-38%
Sequential Read 256KB
3249.41
1602.12
-51%
3426.56
5%
3250.14
0%
3587.83
10%
3866.75
19%
3429.17
6%
3608 ?(3249 - 4384, n=26)
11%
1882 ?(226 - 4512, n=197, last 2 years)
-42%
Sequential Write 256KB
2758.14
1253.34
-55%
1389.84
-50%
1014.33
-63%
2601.45
-6%
2643.38
-4%
3061.82
11%
2530 ?(555 - 3348, n=26)
-8%
1467 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=197, last 2 years)
-47%
Random Read 4KB
379.42
284.34
-25%
449.77
19%
441.77
16%
387.72
2%
367.89
-3%
450.1
19%
406 ?(218 - 483, n=26)
7%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=197, last 2 years)
-27%
Random Write 4KB
470.17
264.45
-44%
152.92
-67%
156.82
-67%
546.98
16%
521.43
11%
572.05
22%
421 ?(152.9 - 730, n=26)
-10%
310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=197, last 2 years)
-34%

游戏：不能达到120帧

虽然有几个游戏支持120赫兹的刷新率，但我们在测试的任何游戏中都无法达到这个要求。Armajet，自带无上限的fps模式，除非手动启用60 fps，否则会降至30 fps。

也就是说，我们确实在Armajet、PUBG Mobile HD和Genshin Impact Ultra中观察到60帧的游戏，没有明显的节流。PUBG MobileUltra HD模式的最高帧数为40帧，相当稳定。

PUBG移动版超高清：40 fps
PUBG移动版超高清：40 fps
PUBG移动高清版：60帧
PUBG移动高清版：60帧
元神冲击超：60帧
元神冲击超：60帧
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
OnePlus 11 5G; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø58.5 (44-61)
OnePlus 11 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.5.0: Ø59.8 (56-61)
OnePlus 11 5G; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.5.0: Ø39.9 (34-41)
OnePlus 11 5G; Genshin Impact; 3.6.0_13833164_13951843: Ø59.4 (56-61)

排放物：低温高速蒸气室不达标


温度

OnePlus对其在11 5G中的新冷冻速度冷却系统大加赞赏，该系统显然提供了3685平方毫米的蒸汽室面积。即使有了这种所谓的改进的冷却系统，该手机在3DMark Wild Life稳定性测试中仍落后于竞争对手。

在我们的压力测试中，表面温度偏高，但用户在日常使用中不太可能让手机承受这种负荷。

Max. Load
 44.6 °C42.8 °C39.2 °C 
 45.2 °C44.2 °C39.4 °C 
 45 °C43.4 °C39.8 °C 
Maximum: 45.2 °C
Average: 42.6 °C
42.4 °C40 °C38.2 °C
39.4 °C39.6 °C37.4 °C
38.6 °C39 °C37.2 °C
Maximum: 42.4 °C
Average: 39.1 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Amprobe TMD-50 // Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
压力测试 - 页首
压力测试 - 页首
压力测试 - 底部
压力测试 - 底部

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91.8 % +87%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.1 % +70%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
82 % +67%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
74.1 % +51%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.3 % +41%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 % +41%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.6 % +9%
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
96.3 % +83%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.2 % +68%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.7 % +55%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.1 % +39%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
68 % +29%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.7 % +12%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.8 % +10%
OnePlus 11 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52.6 %
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø17.7 (11.6-22)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø14.4 (13.4-20.1)
OnePlus 11 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø59.1 (38.5-78.6)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø50.6 (47.5-59.3)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø55.3 (50.8-74)

发言人

OnePlus 11提供立体声扬声器设置，一个扬声器在底座，另一个在听筒。声音输出为85.7分贝（A）。中音和高音都很均衡，但低音不足。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.221.22525.322.13124.319.74019.222.75021.726.76327.327.78025.332.510033.438.812525.74516024.352.120027.958.825020.963.331517.964.840017.968.350014.970.663014.570.48001474.5100012.97712501275.7160012.176.3200012.474.3250012.273.1315012.671.8400013.574.5500012.773.5630012.868.9800012.670.11000012.570.81250012.168.71600011.463.6SPL26.485.7N0.967.3median 12.9median 70.4Delta3.65.135.644.335.230.332.627.92929.737.438.130.631.629.333.226.736.624.34622.556.218.85516.258.51258.99.960.711.767.810.368.511.970.3127212.175.61276.312.180.112.779.612.779.512.978.213.378.213.276.513.674.613.67513.371.412.760.325.1890.776median 12.7median 7228.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 11 5GApple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 11 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理：闲置时耗费了大量的能量

消耗功率

在耗电方面，OnePlus 11似乎不是很经济。奇怪的是，我们注意到，与空闲平均数和空闲最大值相比，空闲最小消耗量更高。即使在重复测量后，情况也是如此。

最大负荷下的能量需求与OnePlus 10 Pro相似，但竞争对手在这方面的表现明显更好。

Power Consumption
Idledarkmidlight 2.37 / 1.61 / 1.79 Watt
Load midlight 6.78 / 11.53 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 11 5G
5000 mAh		OnePlus 10 Pro
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S23+
4700 mAh		Xiaomi 13 Pro
4820 mAh		Vivo X90 Pro
4870 mAh		Apple iPhone 14 Pro
3200 mAh		Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
4610 mAh		Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh		Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
6000 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
23%
42%
49%
34%
15%
43%
34%
34%
49%
8%
20%
Idle Minimum *
2.37
0.7
70%
0.9
62%
0.64
73%
1.02
57%
0.9
62%
0.56
76%
0.74
69%
1.24
48%
0.75
68%
1.036 ?(0.7 - 2.37, n=23)
56%
0.882 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=157, last 2 years)
63%
Idle Average *
1.61
1.1
32%
1.05
35%
0.88
45%
1.36
16%
2.32
-44%
1.37
15%
1.84
-14%
1.39
14%
0.85
47%
1.766 ?(0.8 - 7.18, n=23)
-10%
1.448 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=157, last 2 years)
10%
Idle Maximum *
1.79
1.7
5%
1.1
39%
0.94
47%
1.58
12%
2.39
-34%
1.42
21%
1.86
-4%
1.42
21%
1.14
36%
1.94 ?(1.07 - 8.22, n=23)
-8%
1.603 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=157, last 2 years)
10%
Load Average *
6.78
6.4
6%
3.99
41%
4.18
38%
4.29
37%
3.64
46%
3.42
50%
2.75
59%
3.58
47%
3.52
48%
7.22 ?(2.61 - 15.3, n=23)
-6%
6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=152, last 2 years)
3%
Load Maximum *
11.53
11.3
2%
7.82
32%
6.59
43%
6.15
47%
6.53
43%
5.56
52%
4.54
61%
6.99
39%
6.01
48%
10.4 ?(4.57 - 18.1, n=23)
10%
9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=152, last 2 years)
14%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
OnePlus 11 5G SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.24 (1.053-11.4)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.7 (1.089-14.7)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16, A16 GPU 5-Core; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.5 (0.1174-5.92)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.938 (0.899-1.321)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16, A16 GPU 5-Core; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.776 (0.721-0.852)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
OnePlus 11 5G SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.41 (4.7-9.46)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.6 (10.3-12.7)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16, A16 GPU 5-Core; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.84 (5.78-5.88)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.938 (0.899-1.321)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16, A16 GPU 5-Core; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.776 (0.721-0.852)

电池寿命

尽管OnePlus 11采用了5000毫安时的电池，但其相对较高的闲置功耗也反映在较短的电池运行时间上。总的来说，电池寿命似乎比OnePlus 10 Pro有所提高，但竞争对手，如拥有4700毫安时电池的Galaxy S23+，提供的运行时间明显更长。

盒子里捆绑了一个100瓦的SuperVOOC充电器，这可能看起来比10T附带的150瓦充电器要低。然而，这个100瓦的充电器可以在短短30分钟内将手机从零充到满电。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
28h 00min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 23min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
11h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
23h 00min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 08min
OnePlus 11 5G
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 5000 mAh		OnePlus 10 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S23+
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 4700 mAh		Xiaomi 13 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 4820 mAh		Vivo X90 Pro
Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 4870 mAh		Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16, A16 GPU 5-Core, 3200 mAh		Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 6000 mAh		Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
-15%
21%
30%
-11%
13%
14%
26%
8%
Reader / Idle
1680
1617
-4%
2139
27%
2585
54%
1509
-10%
2659
58%
2448
46%
2253 ?(1160 - 14042, n=115, last 2 years)
34%
H.264
1380
1121
-19%
1543
12%
1524
10%
1263
-8%
1397
1%
1554
13%
1312 ?(859 - 2321, n=114, last 2 years)
-5%
WiFi v1.3
803
767
-4%
1100
37%
1196
49%
846
5%
909
13%
807
0%
1050
31%
991 ?(476 - 3244, n=209, last 2 years)
23%
Load
368
255
-31%
400
9%
385
5%
254
-31%
351
-5%
412
12%
289 ?(73 - 427, n=112, last 2 years)
-21%

Pros

+ 对于 2023 年的旗舰产品来说，价格合理
+ 4年的操作系统功能更新和5年的安全补丁
+ 快速和稳定的网络改进
+ 改进的5000万像素IMX890主摄像头和微距模式与4800万像素超广角
+ 自然配置文件中的色彩准确的显示
+ 快速的CPU性能

Cons

- 没有无线充电
- 较慢的USB2.0标准
- 所有亮度下的PWM
- 游戏中不支持120帧
- 闲置时的高耗电量
- 电池运行时间低于竞争对手的小电池

评语：一个全面的、有竞争力的旗舰产品

OnePlus 11 5G。审查单位由OnePlus印度公司提供。
OnePlus 11 5G。审查单位由OnePlus印度公司提供。

在10 Pro给人留下平淡无奇的印象之后，OnePlus似乎终于通过11 5G找回了自己的魔力。一加为其2023年的旗舰机带来了几个好东西。支持eSIM，256GB版本的UFS 4.0闪存，明显改进的新的5000万像素主摄像头，以及4800万像素超广角的微距模式是其中一些值得注意的。

然而，取消无线充电，降级到USB 2.0速度，减少2倍长焦变焦，以及超广角相机的115°焦距大大减少，在与OnePlus 10 Pro比较时，这些都是显而易见的。 一加10专业版.OxygenOS仍然是ColorOS的翻版，与承诺的不同，没有重大差异，但至少你可以得到四年的功能更新。

一加11拥有快速的CPU，有能力的射手，以及长期的操作系统支持，肯定会引起那些以相对较低的价格寻找旗舰机功能的人的兴趣。然而，长期的粉丝会注意到一些退步"。

显示屏很生动，颜色似乎很鲜艳，但我们无法测量广告中的1300尼特峰值亮度，即使在HDR模式下也是如此。PWM在所有亮度水平上都很明显，它甚至影响了我们的响应时间测量。

骁龙8代的潜力在OnePlus 11中没有得到充分的利用。这款手机默认为SoC节流，高性能模式似乎只有利于CPU基准测试。大肆宣扬的冷冻速度冷却也需要更多工作。

OnePlus还需要对11 5G的功耗进行微调，特别是在空闲时。这对电池寿命有直接影响，相对于竞争对手来说，它可能会更好。

尽管有这些明显的缺点，但有竞争力的价格使天平倾向于一加11。

我们的测试机售价为61,999英镑（800美元），有能力对抗今年的其他骁龙8代2手机，包括像三星Galaxy S23+(₹94,999),小米13 Pro(₹79,999)，有时甚至还有华硕ROG Phone 7 Ultimate(₹99,999).

如果你想用一台价格不高的2023年旗舰级设备来奖励自己，或者想尝试一下世界上三星和小米的可行替代品，一加11 5G值得高度考虑。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

OnePlus 11 5G可从OnePlus.in，也可从印度亚马逊和美国亚马逊购买泰坦黑和永恒绿两种版本的产品。

TradingShenzhen在欧洲以707欧元的折扣价提供OnePlus 11 16 GB/256 GB。

OnePlus 11 5G - 05/03/2023 v7 (old)
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
54 / 70 → 77%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
91%
Games Performance
68 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
97 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
84 / 90 → 94%
Camera
80%
Average
84%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > OnePlus 11 5G智能手机评论：一款具有竞争力的骁龙8代2代旗舰，有一些不可忽视的怪癖
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam, 2023-05- 4 (Update: 2024-08-15)