Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

Oppo Find X8 Pro 智能手机评测--凭借创新电池技术向 iPhone 发起进攻

别人能做到的,我们早就能做到了。

Find X 系列也在欧洲卷土重来:Find X8 Pro 配备哈苏相机、联发科高端 SoC、明亮的 OLED 显示屏和超长电池续航时间,具备了顶级市场所需的一切。但这足以挑战大型厂商吗?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM 5G AI Smartphone

判决

Oppo Find X8 Pro 外观时尚、机身纤薄、质量上乘,无需躲避其他高端智能手机。然而,我们的测试设备根本不想这样做;相反,它凭借明亮且色彩非常准确的 AMOLED 屏幕、大容量内存、触觉拍照按钮和 6 年更新的良好承诺,自信地向大型厂商发起了进攻。

它几乎没有任何真正的弱点,甚至可以凭借有线和无线快速充电技术超越一些老牌制造商。相机的质量也令人印象深刻,有两个变焦镜头和一个专用的人像镜头。

如果将 联发科 Dimensity 9400高通骁龙 8 精英版相比,我们的测试结果显然要慢得多。与Apple 的 A18 Pro相比,Oppo Find X8 Pro 的 SoC 也要逊色不少。尽管如此,它的性能足以满足日常使用需求,在绝大多数应用程序中都不会有任何差别。

硅碳电池是一项伟大的创新,它能以较轻的重量提供大量能量,从而实现非常好的续航时间。

总的来说,Oppo Find X8 Pro 拥有灵活的相机系统、强大的续航能力和高性能,绝对是Apple 、三星等公司的竞争对手。

Pros

+ 极速手机
+ 高质量外壳
+ 防水防尘
+ 色彩鲜艳明亮的 AMOLED
+ 出色的相机变焦性能
+ 运行时间长
+ USB 3.2 端口
+ 支持 eSIM 卡
+ 长期更新承诺
+ 精确定位

Cons

- 对价格自信
- 很少努力实现可持续发展
- 通过无线局域网传输时速度相对较慢
- PWM 闪烁

价格和供应情况

Oppo Find X8 Pro 已在部分欧洲国家上市。这款配备 16GB 内存和 512GB 大容量存储空间的手机官方售价为 1,199 欧元(约合人民币 1263 元)。

这款手机要到 2025 年才会在德国上市,但您目前可以通过荷兰奥普专卖店将其运送到德国,例如目前甚至可以享受 50 欧元(约合 53 美元)的折扣。

Amazon Logo
Amazon
AKABEILA [1 Pack Privacy Screen Protector for Oppo Find X8 Pro Privacy Glass Full Coverage Anti Spy Tempered Glass Protective Film Anti-scratch Black&1
  • $8.99
    Shantime 2 Pack Tempered Glass Screen Protectors for OPPO Find X8 Pro 5G Ultra Clear HD Protection Film for OPPO Find X8 Pro 5G (6.78 inches)
  • $4.33
    AKABEILA 1 Pack Screen Protector for Oppo Find X8 Pro HD Tempered Glass Protective Film 9H Hardness Case Friendly Easy Installation Anti-Fingerprint Bubble Free Black&1

潜在的竞争对手比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
87.3%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. 
AKABEILA [1 Pack Privacy Scr...
2. $8.99
Shantime 2 Pack Tempered Gla...
3. $4.33
AKABEILA 1 Pack Screen Prote...
List Price: 1199€
215 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"
2780x1264
450 PPI
AMOLED
2.
86%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $1,099.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - Unlo...
2. $9.99
OMOTON Screen Protector only...
3. $5.99
Ferilinso Full Coverage 3 Pa...
List Price: 1299€
221 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"
2992x1344
482 PPI
OLED
3.
88.1%
OnePlus 12
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon: $751.17
List Price: 979 EUR
220 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"
3168x1440
510 PPI
AMOLED
4.
88.6%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro ⎘
Apple A18 Pro GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe
Amazon:
1. $37.00
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Clea...
2. $1,439.96
iPhone 16 Pro Max / 256GB / ...
3. $7.89
Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto...
List Price: 1449€
227 g256 GB NVMe6.90"
2868x1320
458 PPI
Super Retina XDR OLED
5.
91.1% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
List Price: 1449€
232 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"
3120x1440
505 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X

近年来,Oppo 在欧洲市场略显沉寂,因为这家制造商面临着诸多挑战:品牌的明确分离和母公司的解散被提上日程,公司还不得不应对在德国的专利诉讼。

但现在,这家制造商又重振旗鼓,并希望通过 Oppo Find X8 Pro 来证明自己:这是一款高端智能手机,集摄像头传感器制造商、SoC 制造商和芯片供应商之大成。该机型已在中国上市,售价约为 890 欧元(约合 938 美元)。它在西方的价格会更高,但与其他旗舰手机的价格一致。

另一个挑战者对欧洲的手机市场来说无疑是件好事,因此我们期待着 Oppo 智能手机的测试结果。你也一样吗?好了,让我们马上开始吧。

规格

Oppo Find X8 Pro (Find X8 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 8 x - 3.6 GHz, Cortex-X925, X4, A720
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
Display
6.78 inch 19.8:9, 2780 x 1264 pixel 450 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 2160Hz PWM Dimming (70 nits or below), Dolby Vision, HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 495 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 53, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 41, 48, 53, 70, 71, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 162.3 x 76.7
Battery
5910 mAh Silicon-Carbon, 80 Watt charging, 50 Watt wireless charging, 10 Watt reverse wireless charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix 50.0MP, f/​1.6, phase comparison-AF (All-pixel AF/​omnidirectional), laser-AF, OIS, dual LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​60fps (Camera 1); 50.0MP, f/​2.0, phase comparison-AF (All-pixel AF/​omnidirectional), wide angle lens (Camera 2); 50.0MP, f/​4.3, phase comparison-AF, OIS, periscope-telephoto lens (Camera 3); 50.0MP, f/​2.6, phase comparison-AF, OIS, periscope-telephoto lens (Camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.4, 21mm
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, fanless, waterproof
Weight
215 g
Price
1199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

机箱 - 优雅的机箱,手感略显薄弱

Oppo Find X8 Pro 的机身由玻璃和铝合金制成,背面为哑光深灰色表面或珠光白色表面。中国的蓝色版本没有进入欧洲。铝边框与颜色相匹配,也是磨砂材质。在顶部中央,圆形摄像头模块从外壳的其他部分中脱颖而出,并被棱形金属边框包围。

外观和手感都非常优质,经典的配色方案让这款智能手机能很好地融入任何环境。正面的玻璃向四角倒圆角,但比以前的机型要隐蔽得多,不容易误触。显示屏四周的窄边和对称边赋予了这款智能手机现代的外观。

Oppo Find X8 Pro 的做工达到了很高的水准,设备看起来很结实,手感也很好。只是在玻璃和边框之间的过渡处有稍微明显的棱角,而且在扭动时会有轻微的吱吱声,这在一定程度上降低了对质量的印象。

该设备通过了 IP68/69 防护等级认证,这意味着它可以在淡水中潜水(不要太深),也可以在多尘环境中使用,甚至可以抵御高压水柱。

Oppo Find X8 Pro 重 215 克(约 7.6 盎司),是一款相当轻巧的高端智能手机。就尺寸而言,它相当纤薄,厚度为 8.2 毫米(约 0.32 英寸),但屏幕也比许多其他顶级手机略小。

尺寸比较

164.3 mm 75.8 mm 9.2 mm 220 g162.8 mm 76.6 mm 8.5 mm 221 g163 mm 77.6 mm 8.25 mm 227 g162.3 mm 79 mm 8.6 mm 232 g162.3 mm 76.7 mm 8.2 mm 215 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - 内置大量内存

在欧洲,这款 OPPO 旗舰机将推出大内存版本,配备 16 GB 内存和 512 GB 大容量存储空间。1199 欧元(约合 1263 美元)的价格表明,制造商有信心在高水平上竞争。考虑到内存配置,这一价格仍明显低于Apple 或三星顶级机型的建议售价,而与此同时,诸如 一加 12Honor Magic6 Pro等手机现在的售价要低得多。因此,Oppo Find X8 Pro 目前并不便宜。 首批优惠在欧洲正式发布之前就已经出现了。

在国际上,还有其他存储变体,如 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 大容量存储,或 16 GB 内存和 1 TB 数据存储。此外,在国际上还有一种带有卫星通信功能的机型,可用于紧急情况,但不在欧洲销售。

在 USB 端口方面,Oppo 采用了数据吞吐量高达 5 GBit/s 的 USB 3.2 Gen.1。它还可以输出图像信号,以便通过电缆连接外部显示器。还可通过 Miracast 无线传输图像,但并非所有显示器都支持此功能。

提供两个 nano-SIM 卡插槽,还可存储 eSIM 配置文件。不过,只能同时使用两张 SIM 卡。虽然没有 microSD 读卡器,但有一个红外线传感器,可用于操作电视等设备。

链接:通知滑块
链接:通知滑块
右:照相机按钮、待机按钮、音量摇杆
右:照相机按钮、待机按钮、音量摇杆
以上:麦克风、红外热像仪
以上:麦克风、红外热像仪
底部SIM 卡插槽、麦克风、USB-C 接口、麦克风、扬声器
底部SIM 卡插槽、麦克风、USB-C 接口、麦克风、扬声器

软件 - 长达六年的更新

ColorOS 15 基于Android 15,在许多方面都与标准的Android 有所不同,系统拥有高品质的外观和感觉,反应非常迅速。在某些方面,ColorOS 的设计让人想起Apple 的 iOS。

人工智能当然是一个重要的话题,但用户也应立即意识到人工智能的使用,因此会在显示屏周围用彩色边框标记出来。得益于智能助手的帮助,旧图片可以在 "照片 "应用中按比例放大,或者在 "笔记 "应用中汇总文本。

制造商承诺为其手机提供五次操作系统更新和直到 2030 年(即六年)的安全补丁。

可持续性

在可持续发展方面,Oppo 为客户提供了长期使用手机的机会,这要归功于其软件的支持期。

这款智能手机的包装不使用塑料,采用大豆油油墨印刷。根据 OPPO 的可持续发展报告,包装所用的纤维有 45% 是由可回收材料制成的。不过,包装上还有一个令人眼花缭乱的特殊印花,但不清楚是否采用了环保方法。

至于设备本身,迄今为止只有意向声明,没有使用回收材料的证明。此外,也没有关注用户的可修复性,而且几乎不可能进行检查。在ifixit.com上只有很少的维修指南,而且只针对部分机型。

总体而言,与Apple 或 Fairphone 等专注于可持续发展的供应商相比,Oppo 在这方面仍有一些不足之处。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 快速无线局域网,传输时有弱点

SoC 的 Wi-Fi 调制解调器还支持最新的 Wi-Fi 标准,即 Wi-Fi 7,但遗憾的是,由于相应的路由器(尤其是带有 10 Gbit LAN 端口的路由器)尚未纳入我们的测试程序,因此我们还无法对其进行测试。在 6 GHz 频段,即使用 WiFi 6E,Oppo Find X8 Pro 的接收速度相当快:我们使用参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 测得的平均速度为 1,610 MBit/s。

不过,在发送数据时,这款 OPPO 智能手机却落后于其他高端设备;即使多次重复测试,我们也无法获得超过 650 Mbps 的速度。Find X8 Pro 仍能很好地利用千兆内部线路。说到更快的内部网络,市场上还有更快的智能手机。

为了接入移动网络,4G 和 5G 网络都支持多种频率。这意味着,Find X8 Pro 也可以带到国外,并提供移动互联网接入。与 iPhone 16 Pro Max但这在日常生活中几乎不会起作用。

正如我们在测试期间进行的随机测试所显示的那样,接收能力达到了很高的水平。与其他高端手机相比,我们的测试设备也表现出色,即使在高楼之间等困难情况下也不会完全失去网络。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
OnePlus 12
Wi-Fi 7
1119 (1086min - 1176max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (556 - 1801, n=48)
1011 MBit/s
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Wi-Fi 7
965 (943min - 995max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Wi-Fi 7
887 (567min - 946max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=191, last 2 years)
733 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
556 (253min - 611max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
OnePlus 12
Wi-Fi 7
1857 (1766min - 1917max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (565 - 1875, n=48)
989 MBit/s
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Wi-Fi 7
915 (852min - 926max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
801 (397min - 819max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Wi-Fi 7
762 (726min - 784max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=189, last 2 years)
717 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Wi-Fi 7
1852 (911min - 1895max) MBit/s +229%
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (563 - 1945, n=36)
1556 MBit/s +176%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
1553 (815min - 1800max) MBit/s +176%
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1945, n=79, last 2 years)
1451 MBit/s +158%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Wi-Fi 7
1418 (1324min - 1435max) MBit/s +152%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
563 (494min - 652max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Wi-Fi 7
1864 (1828min - 1880max) MBit/s +16%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
1610 (1480min - 1722max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (892 - 1864, n=36)
1554 MBit/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
1461 (1284min - 1543max) MBit/s -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (668 - 1864, n=79, last 2 years)
1385 MBit/s -14%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Wi-Fi 7
1258 (1190min - 1287max) MBit/s -22%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Oppo Find X8 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø563 (494-652)
Oppo Find X8 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1610 (1480-1722)
户外 GPS 测试
户外 GPS 测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

我们还检查了 Oppo Find X8 Pro 的定位系统。为此,我们首先走到室外,很快就找到了精确度为 3 米(约 10 英尺)的位置。不过,理论上还可以达到更高的精度,因为这款手机还支持 SBAS,可以实现更精确的定位。

我们对定位功能的实际测试包括在城市中穿行一圈,由于天气寒冷,我们破例开车进行了测试。Oppo Find X8 Pro 必须在与 Garmin Venu 2 的直接对比中证明自己,后者是一款定位特别精确的智能手表。

它的工作做得非常好:只有少数地方与实际路线略有偏差,在过桥时,向外的旅程似乎是在水中进行的,但除此之外,这款手机的精确度足以用于日常生活中的追踪。

位置 OPPO Find X8 Pro - 概览
位置 OPPO Find X8 Pro - 概览
定位 OPPO Find X8 Pro - 转折
定位 OPPO Find X8 Pro - 转折
位置 OPPO Find X8 Pro - 桥接
位置 OPPO Find X8 Pro - 桥接
定位 Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
定位 Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
定位 Garmin Venu 2 - 转弯
定位 Garmin Venu 2 - 转弯
定位 Garmin Venu 2 - 桥接器
定位 Garmin Venu 2 - 桥接器

电话功能和话音质量 - 偶尔有点闷

ColorOS 默认使用谷歌的电话应用程序,但也可以轻松安装其他供应商的电话应用程序,并将其设置为默认设置。

通过内置听筒通话的音质还算不错,不过与我们通话的人听起来时不时会有点闷。麦克风能清晰地记录我们的声音,但声音过大时容易失真。

扬声器和免提麦克风拾取对方声音时低音明显减少,听起来有点单薄。不过,对方的声音仍然清晰易懂。即使我们说话的声音不是很大,也能很好地记录下来。

摄像机 - 四台摄像机组成梦幻组合

录制前置摄像头
录制前置摄像头

背面有四个 5000 万像素镜头,从超广角镜头到主摄像头和两个潜望式长焦镜头,每个镜头都有不同的焦距,因此有多种图像构图选择。

我们的变焦系列显示,即使是手持 100 倍变焦,在日光下仍能获得相当不错的效果,而 50 倍变焦下的图像看起来仍然非常锐利。这使得 Oppo Find X8 Pro 成为目前市场上变焦能力最强的智能手机之一。

主摄像头拍摄的图像看起来也很优质,不过植物图像背景的人工虚化有点过强。在对焦区域,图像精确且细节丰富。环境图像的高动态范围给 OPPO 相机和对比手机都带来了问题,因为教堂时钟闪亮的指针总是过度发光。总体而言,Oppo 手机的成像效果不错,色彩还原逼真。即使在弱光环境下,许多结构看起来仍然非常清晰。

广角摄像头操作简洁,甚至比其他一些高端手机更能展现周围环境的细节。

前置摄像头为 3200 万像素,自拍效果很好,在明亮的背景和光线不足的脸部也没有问题。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera PlantMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low LightWide Angle camera
0.6 倍变焦
0.6 倍变焦
1 倍变焦
1 倍变焦
2 倍变焦
2 倍变焦
3 倍变焦
3 倍变焦
6 倍变焦
6 倍变焦
10 倍变焦
10 倍变焦
15 倍变焦
15 倍变焦
20 倍变焦
20 倍变焦
30 倍变焦
30 倍变焦
50 倍变焦
50 倍变焦
100 倍变焦
100 倍变焦
120 倍变焦
120 倍变焦

主摄像头必须在实验室中展示其性能。对比度方面存在一些小问题,但总体而言显示效果非常清晰。在只有 1 勒克斯的情况下,我们的测试图看起来很粗糙,但内容仍然清晰可辨。

色彩显示也相当逼真,手机的色彩图对比照片就证明了这一点。

ColorChecker
7.7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X8 Pro: 6.48 ∆E min: 2.13 - max: 12.21 ∆E
ColorChecker
26.9 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
30 ∆E
34 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
45 ∆E
47 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
30 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
38.7 ∆E
38.4 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X8 Pro: 32.16 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 46.99 ∆E

附件和保修 - 交货时不带充电器

Oppo Find X8 Pro 没有配备充电器,只有一根充电线和一个 SIM 卡工具。在该公司的网上商店,一个合适的充电器价格约为 40 欧元(约合 42 美元),而在amazon.de上的价格更低,从 27 欧元(约合 28 美元)起。

制造商提供 保修保修期为 24 个月。

输入设备和操作 - 快速操作

Oppo Find X8 Pro 的触摸屏每秒最多可扫描 240 次触摸。操作非常流畅可靠,边缘和角落也很灵敏。

还有一种模式可以让触摸屏的反应更加灵敏,戴着手套也能轻松使用。此外,动画的速度可以设置得更快,这样系统的反应会更直接。

作为一项特殊功能,Oppo Find X8 Pro 的外壳上还有两个物理按键,分别位于音量摇杆和待机键的旁边:一个警报滑块,可以选择振动、铃声或通知静音。

OPPO 还安装了一个触觉拍照按钮,这让人不禁想起Apple iPhone 16 系列上的新拍照按钮。它的工作原理也完全相同:即使在待机状态下,按两下也能激活拍照模式。滑动手指可以放大照片,按一次就可以拍照。这个功能很好用,对拍照爱好者来说是个不错的补充。

指纹传感器位于屏幕后方,在设备上很靠下。如果你只用一只手拿着手机,就很难触碰到它。在设置指纹时,一定要确保在稍高的位置也能触摸到。不过,总的来说,传感器工作非常可靠,解锁设备无需等待。

通过面部识别解锁也是可行的,但只能通过前置摄像头进行二维识别,没有额外的传感器。因此,这种方法更容易被操纵,而且不能用作某些安全措施的验证。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
键盘景观
键盘景观

显示屏 - 色彩明亮逼真

子像素图像
子像素图像

Oppo Find X8 Pro 的 AMOLED 屏幕达到了非常精细的显示效果,像素为 2,780 x 1,264,尺寸为 6.8 英寸。

日常使用中的最大亮度约为 1,160 cd/m²,但在 HDR 模式下,小表面上的亮度可达 4,500 cd/m²。

我们测量到在亮度很低的情况下会出现 PWM 闪烁,但频率与帧频相适应。不过,敏感的人在最终购买手机之前应该先试用一下屏幕,看看是否会出现头痛或眼睛疲劳等症状。

1168
cd/m²
1157
cd/m²
1155
cd/m²
1166
cd/m²
1167
cd/m²
1161
cd/m²
1152
cd/m²
1164
cd/m²
1149
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1168 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1159.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1167 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.87 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.311
Oppo Find X8 Pro
AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
OLED, 2992x1344, 6.8"
OnePlus 12
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9"
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.8"
Screen
42%
-41%
-58%
-95%
Brightness middle
1167
2148
84%
1026
-12%
1055
-10%
1317
13%
Brightness
1160
2050
77%
991
-15%
1061
-9%
1365
18%
Brightness Distribution
98
86
-12%
91
-7%
93
-5%
94
-4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.87
0.5
43%
1.19
-37%
1.5
-72%
3.4
-291%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.64
1.4
15%
3.3
-101%
4.7
-187%
5
-205%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
0.8
43%
2.4
-71%
2.3
-64%
2.8
-100%
Gamma
2.311 95%
2.23 99%
2.24 98%
2.21 100%
2 110%
CCT
6426 101%
6582 99%
6920 94%
6625 98%
6458 101%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.5

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 86 Hz
Amplitude: 19 %

The display backlight flickers at 86 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 86 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

在我们使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行的测量中,可以明显看出屏幕在 "专业 "模式下可以实现非常精确的色彩表现。肉眼已无法看到色调和灰度的偏差,许多色值也几乎无法测量。这样还可以对屏幕上的色彩进行专业评估。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
CalMAN 色彩空间 AdobeRGB
CalMAN 色彩空间 AdobeRGB
CalMAN 色彩空间 DCI P3
CalMAN 色彩空间 DCI P3
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8 ms rise
↘ 0.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

由于亮度高,该显示屏在室外也能很好地使用,在阴暗的环境中使用可大大减少屏幕上的反光,使阅读更加舒适。

由于色彩或亮度值没有明显变化,因此即使从平视角度观看,图像仍然非常清晰。

室外使用
室外使用
观点
观点

性能 - 全新 SoC 令人信服

联发科 联发科 Dimensity 9400是一款相当新的 SoC,联发科希望凭借它在高端市场占据一席之地。Oppo Find X8 Pro 搭载的这款芯片可使处理器时钟频率高达 3.62 GHz。

我们的基准测试表明,该芯片还不足以跻身顶级行列:虽然与今年的顶级智能手机相比,Oppo 旗舰手机的优势显而易见,但与 iPhone 16 Pro Max的处理器性能相差甚远。此外,高通 Snapdragon 8 Elite 也在前方投下了阴影,明年的许多旗舰机可能都将配备该处理器。我们已经对参考设计进行了测试,由于采用了特殊设计的 CPU 单元,它的性能更加强大。

不过,在日常使用中能否明显感觉到性能上的差异还是个问题,因为 联发科 Dimensity 9400的性能足以流畅运行绝大多数应用程序,并且加载时间很短。只有在执行非常复杂的任务时,例如剪辑大量片段的视频时,你才会注意到性能上的差异。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
3479 Points +34%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2605 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  ()
2605 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2287 Points -12%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2148 Points -18%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1950 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=165, last 2 years)
1478 Points -43%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
8568 Points +15%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
7480 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  ()
7480 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
7102 Points -5%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6630 Points -11%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4741 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=165, last 2 years)
4126 Points -45%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1838 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  ()
1838 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1716 Points -7%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1672 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)
1021 Points -44%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6426 Points +9%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6088 Points +4%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
5870 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  ()
5870 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)
3404 Points -42%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2374537 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  ()
2374537 Points 0%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2005881 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1837994 Points -23%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
1739816 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=101, last 2 years)
1259783 Points -47%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18672 Points +52%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
15690 Points +27%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
13235 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 26863, n=191, last 2 years)
13055 Points +6%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
12314 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  ()
12314 Points 0%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
1517 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1443 Points +26%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1304 Points +14%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1145 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  ()
1145 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1081 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2044, n=160, last 2 years)
894 Points -22%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
10697 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  ()
10697 Points 0%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
10522 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9696 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)
6363 Points -41%
System
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
16475 Points +28%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
14531 Points +13%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
12891 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  ()
12891 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)
10203 Points -21%
Memory
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
11357 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
10389 Points +10%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
9432 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  ()
9432 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)
6843 Points -27%
Graphics
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
56004 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  ()
56004 Points 0%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
38959 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
27905 Points -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)
17343 Points -69%
Web
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1923 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  ()
1923 Points 0%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1907 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1815 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)
1569 Points -18%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
75143 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  ()
75143 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18852 Points -75%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
18127 Points -76%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 75143, n=146, last 2 years)
17392 Points -77%
AImark - Score v3.x
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
51509 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  ()
51509 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
33044 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=138, last 2 years)
25706 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1518 Points -97%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1473 Points -97%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1368 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  ()
1368 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (191 - 4619, n=35, last 2 years)
845 Points -38%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
488 Points -64%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
442 Points -68%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
9283 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  ()
9283 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4754 Points -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (192 - 32432, n=35, last 2 years)
4196 Points -55%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
487 Points -95%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
12709 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  ()
12709 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
6286 Points -51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=35, last 2 years)
5989 Points -53%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1128 Points -91%

ARM Immortalis-G925作为 SoC 中的图形芯片,它拥有 12 个内核。它具有很高的性能,还可以部分取代 Apple A18 Pro GPU进行图形计算。配备 骁龙 8 精英版将提供更强的图形处理能力,我们对参考设备的测试也证明了这一点。

不过,根据基准测试,即使是 4K 分辨率的复杂游戏,在 Oppo 智能手机上的运行速度也应在 40 fps 左右,因此几乎没有理由要求更高的图形处理能力。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5383 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4804 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
4739 Points -12%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4331 Points -20%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2605 Points -52%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6303 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5040 Points -20%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
4752 Points -25%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4444 Points -29%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2548 Points -60%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9461 Points
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8237 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
8146 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7510 Points -21%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9553 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8620 Points -10%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
8264 Points -13%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8017 Points -16%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1998 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
1715 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1629 Points -18%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1598 Points -20%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1050 Points -47%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
2069 Points +1%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2054 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1796 Points -13%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1667 Points -19%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1031 Points -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
744 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
549 fps -26%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
539 fps -28%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
536 fps -28%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +88%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -6%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -6%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
469 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
339 fps -28%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
324 fps -31%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
294 fps -37%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps +95%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
341 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps -28%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
231 fps -32%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
225 fps -34%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps +38%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
172 fps
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
147 fps -15%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
143 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
142 fps -17%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps +20%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps -25%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98 fps
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 fps -28%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
56 fps -43%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -55%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps -54%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70 fps -72%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -76%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -76%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
188 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
187 fps +9%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
184 fps +7%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
172 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps -31%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40 fps -2%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps -15%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
30 fps -27%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -51%

在上网冲浪时,Oppo Find X8 Pro 在基准测试中的速度对于一款高端手机来说只能算中规中矩。无论如何,几乎没有人能与 iPhone 的上网速度相提并论,但在某些基准测试中,其他Android 设备的速度也明显快于 iPhone。

在日常使用中,即使是非常复杂的网站也能快速加载,而且在滚动时通常还能显示图片,因此 Oppo 手机在这方面的性能也完全够用。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
353.735 Points +64%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ()
216 Points 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
215.998 Points
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
215.5 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
209.919 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years)
121.7 Points -44%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
557 runs/min +107%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
289 runs/min +7%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
269 runs/min
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ()
269 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
265 runs/min -1%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)
139.5 runs/min -48%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
33.5 runs/min +106%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
16.3 runs/min
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ()
16.3 runs/min 0%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
14.9 runs/min -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=61, last 2 years)
11.2 runs/min -31%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
271 Points +84%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
212 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
195 Points +33%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
147 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ()
147 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=155, last 2 years)
114.5 Points -22%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
100368 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
72011 Points +18%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
68223 Points +12%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (Chrome 129)
61885 Points +1%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
60987 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ()
60987 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
37721 Points -38%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)
1551 ms * -148%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
625.4 ms *
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ()
625 ms * -0%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
624.1 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
599 ms * +4%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
279.4 ms * +55%

* ... smaller is better

得益于 UFS 4.0 存储系统,Oppo 智能手机在这一领域也毫不逊色。 像素 9 Pro XL和其他高质量的Android 手机不相上下。

Oppo Find X8 ProGoogle Pixel 9 Pro XLOnePlus 12Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
43%
139%
14%
89%
20%
Sequential Read 256KB
3482.9
1850.5
-47%
3297.57
-5%
3610.25
4%
Sequential Write 256KB
3498.5
1280.56
-63%
3246.21
-7%
1893.63
-46%
2973 ?(1524 - 3678, n=32)
-15%
Random Read 4KB
375.7
310.88
-17%
438.5
17%
437.12
16%
Random Write 4KB
100.4
398.27
297%
652.8
550%
181.55
81%

游戏 - 120 帧/秒不是梦

Oppo Find X8 Pro 是一款非常强大的游戏手机,我们在测试一些最流行的手机游戏时发现了这一点。

例如,对图形要求极高的《源氏冲击》能以 60 帧/秒的速度流畅运行,而《PUBG Mobile》甚至能在极低设置下以 120 Hz 的速度运行,从而获得更流畅的滚动和更好的响应速度。我们使用GameBench 软件测试帧频。.

由于采用了精确的触摸屏,通过屏幕玩游戏也非常方便。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Oppo Find X8 Pro; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø59.8 (56-61)
Oppo Find X8 Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø59.4 (50-61)
Oppo Find X8 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø119 (111-121)
Oppo Find X8 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.6 (35-41)
Oppo Find X8 Pro; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low: Ø59.6 (58-61)
Oppo Find X8 Pro; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High: Ø59.7 (57-61)

排放 - 明显节流

温度

在长时间负载的情况下,智能手机的发热温度高达 47.1 °C(116.78 °F),这一点很明显,但尚不严重。不过,我们是在室温下测量的,因此在炎热的夏天,外壳温度可能会更高。

SoC 的性能也会受到高温的影响:在 3DMark 的长期基准测试中,性能有时会下降高达 45%。

Max. Load
 44.5 °C43.2 °C40.4 °C 
 46.6 °C43.1 °C39.2 °C 
 47.1 °C43.2 °C40.1 °C 
Maximum: 47.1 °C
Average: 43 °C
37.7 °C39.2 °C42 °C
39.5 °C42.3 °C41 °C
39.5 °C43.1 °C43 °C
Maximum: 43.1 °C
Average: 40.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.2 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
94.6 % +2%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92.3 %
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78.3 % -15%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.5 % -25%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.1 % -50%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.4 % +40%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79.3 % +37%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
65.5 % +13%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 %
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.4 % -3%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
72.6 % +31%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.5 %
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.9 % -3%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.1 % +44%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82.1 % +35%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.6 % +26%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
73.4 % +20%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 %
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø28.1 (22.2-38.3)
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø14.6 (12.4-15.7)
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.1 (22.9-28.2)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø20.8 (19.3-29.5)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø21.3 (17.6-31.2)
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø67 (63.3-68.6)
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø46.3 (36.8-52.9)
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø84 (79.2-101.1)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø58.5 (56.7-59.9)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø61 (47.5-102.9)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø76.8 (70.5-109.8)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø87.8 (72-121.8)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø21.2 (20.6-28.9)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø21.1 (16.3-31.3)
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø28.3 (21.7-39.1)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø20.8 (20.2-27.7)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø17.6 (13.8-25.6)
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.3 (11.1-18.3)
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.49 (6.32-7.69)
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø11.3 (11-12.5)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø10.9 (10.6-14.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø9.47 (9.01-11.8)

发言人

底部边缘的扬声器由听筒作为第二个扬声器提供支持。这也可以实现轻微的立体声效果。Oppo Find X8 Pro 的音响系统整体音量较大,并能很好地再现中频。即使在音量很高的情况下,高音整体听起来也不会太难听,但仍显得有些过分强调。这可能主要是因为低音几乎听不到。

作为一款高端智能手机,扬声器系统做得很好,能恰当地再现音乐和电影音效。当然,您也可以通过高品质扬声器或通过蓝牙或 USB-C 连接的扬声器获得更好的音效。这两种方式都能顺利使用。最重要的无线音频编解码器均已提供,但您将徒劳地寻找 Opus 或 LC3 等更奇特的编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.943.92540.635.33134.832.14034.433.85037.835.56327.728.18018.431.410021.241.912524.44816023.653.620022.458.825019.562.231519.866.440014.464.850012.86963014.275.680013.173.2100012.473.1125010.773.8160010.875.2200010.576.5250011.278.6315011.779.5400012.270.8500011.970.7630012.177.4800012.277.21000012.177.91250011.859.41600011.454.1SPL2587.8N0.776.1median 12.2median 73.1Delta2.67.536.246.130.739.625.643.926.742.836.743.624.644.317.64618.743.218.245.715.956.617.356.115.260.214.160.413.461.313.866.514.367.713.774.912.478.112.778.612.177.212.981.612.584.612.284.112.88413.18413.578.513.176.913.7741466.813.36425.2930.792.2median 13.5median 74.91.210.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Find X8 ProSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Find X8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 充电快,续航时间长

能源消耗

SoC 的生产工艺采用了现代的 3 纳米工艺,因此能效很高。事实上,Oppo Find X8 Pro 的能耗非常经济,无论是在低负荷还是高负荷的情况下。

通过 OPPO 自家的 Supervooc,这款手机的最高充电功率可达 80 瓦,之后只需不到一个小时就能再次充满电。此外,Find X8 Pro 还支持 Power Delivery 功能,因此在我们的测试实验室中使用任何充电器都能顺利充电,只是需要的时间稍长一些。无线充电的功率最高可达 50 瓦。反向充电的功率也可高达 10 瓦。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.6 / 0.8 / 0.9 Watt
Load midlight 6.8 / 10.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oppo Find X8 Pro
5910 mAh
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
5060 mAh
OnePlus 12
5400 mAh
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
4685 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-59%
-45%
-20%
-64%
-24%
-39%
Idle Minimum *
0.6
0.48
20%
1.3
-117%
0.42
30%
0.73
-22%
0.515 ?(0.43 - 0.6, n=2)
14%
Idle Average *
0.8
1.53
-91%
0.95
-19%
1.55
-94%
1.22
-53%
1.28 ?(0.8 - 1.76, n=2)
-60%
Idle Maximum *
0.9
1.86
-107%
1.12
-24%
1.58
-76%
1.34
-49%
1.365 ?(0.9 - 1.83, n=2)
-52%
Load Average *
6.8
10.55
-55%
3.41
50%
16.52
-143%
8.19 ?(6.8 - 9.58, n=2)
-20%
Load Maximum *
10.9
11.72
-8%
11.82
-8%
16.58
-52%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Oppo Find X8 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.9 (0.652-11.1)
Oppo Find X8 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.685 (0.559-0.896)

Power Consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Oppo Find X8 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.6 (10.5-10.8)
Oppo Find X8 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.685 (0.559-0.896)

电池寿命

OPPO 在电池方面进行了创新,没有使用传统的锂离子电池,而是采用了硅碳负极电池。这在 Honor Magic6 Pro中已经熟悉的技术。

硅碳负极可以大大提高能量密度,因此在相同体积下可以存储更多能量。您也可以将电池做得更小,但存储的能量仍与石墨负极的大型传统锂离子电池相同。此外,电池对温度的敏感性也大大降低,而且硅胶是一种可大量获得的原材料。不过,目前的生产仍然相当复杂和昂贵。

无论如何,这项技术在 OPPO Find X8 Pro 上运行得相当不错,至少它的主要目的是实现长时间运行:得益于高能量密度,电池容量达到了 5910 毫安时,在我们的 WLAN 测试中,续航时间达到了 23:31 小时,大大超过了许多其他高端设备。Oppo Find X8 Pro 在低负载情况下也非常耐用。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
61h 05min
WiFi Websurfing
23h 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
32h 56min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 9min
Oppo Find X8 Pro
5910 mAh
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
5060 mAh
OnePlus 12
5400 mAh
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
4685 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-29%
-22%
5%
-24%
Reader / Idle
3665
1965
-46%
4226
15%
2227
-39%
H.264
1976
1820
-8%
1990
1%
1922
-3%
WiFi v1.3
1411
998
-29%
1237
-12%
1249
-11%
1148
-19%
Load
309
357
16%
202
-35%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Oppo Find X8 Pro 是一个非常令人兴奋的竞争对手,可以与更多知名厂商的高端手机一较高下。它拥有超长的电池续航时间、快速充电、出色的相机系统、快速的 SoC 和全面的功能,在各方面都令人印象深刻。

你可以用你的钱买到一款高品质的手机,但 Oppo Find X8 Pro 目前并不便宜。

Oppo Find X8 Pro - 11/26/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
53 / 69 → 77%
Weight
88%
Battery
93%
Display
92%
Games Performance
47 / 55 → 86%
Application Performance
70 / 85 → 82%
AI Performance
79%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
83 / 90 → 92%
Camera
87%
Average
69%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
80%
Power Use
96.2%
Repairability
0%
Software Updates
96.7%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 45.5%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Oppo Find X8 Pro 智能手机评测--凭借创新电池技术向 iPhone 发起进攻
Florian Schmitt, 2024-11-28 (Update: 2024-11-28)