小米Poco M5s智能手机评测--中端智能手机拥有明亮的OLED显示屏，无PWM闪烁现象

Name: Xiaomi Poco M5s
Brand: Xiaomi

对于那些对PWM敏感的人来说，这是一款完美的智能手机？

Poco M5s的目标是吸引200欧元左右（约211美元）价格范围内的买家。这个目的的最大原因应该是非常明亮的AMOLED面板，超过1000尼特。在我们对Poco M5s的评测中可以发现，在与强大的Redmi竞争对手的比较中，小米手机是否能跟上。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 12/10/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Poco M5s主要应该是以一流的性价比来说服人。就像 Redmi Note 11S，这款经济实惠的Poco智能手机也放弃了集成的5G调制解调器，而且这两款小米智能手机在连接性之外也非常相似。与红米机型一样，Poco M5s使用6.43英寸的AMOLED显示屏，据宣传，其最高亮度超过1000尼特。Poco智能手机的5000毫安时电池也可以在高达33瓦特的情况下相当快速地充电。

这款经济实惠的中端Poco手机内部运行的是联发科Helio G95可以使用高达6GB的内存。凭借4GB内存和64GB存储的小型存储配置，Poco M5s的建议零售价为210欧元（约合221美元），而拥有128GB存储的机型的建议购买价为230欧元（约合243美元）。在本次测试时，拥有6GB工作内存的版本还没有上市。

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Poco M5s (Poco M Series)

Processor

Mediatek Helio G95 8 x 2 - 2.1 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G76 MP4

Memory

4 GB

Display

6.43 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz

Storage

64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 64 GB

, 48 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, OTG, IR blaster, Miracast

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 160.5 x 74.5

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/1.8, 26mm, 1/1.97", 0.7µm) + 8MP (f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12µm) + 2MP (f/2.4) + 2MP (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.4, 1/3.06", 1.12µm)

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, case, USB cable, info material, MIUI13, 12 Months Warranty, SAR value: 0.597W/kg head, 0.870W/kg body, Widevine L1, fanless

Weight

178.8 g

Price

210 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
80.9 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2022	Xiaomi Poco M5s Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4	178.8 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.43"	2400x1080
80 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2022	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2	179 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.43"	2400x1080
77.9 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2	195 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.50"	1600x720
78.5 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2022	Honor X8 SD 680, Adreno 610	177 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.70"	2388x1080
80.8 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2022	Motorola Moto G42 SD 680, Adreno 610	175 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.43"	2400x1080
82.5 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2022	Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	205 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080

外壳 - 小米智能手机的冲孔

在Poco M5s中，玻璃与大量的塑料相遇，但外壳的做工质量好，仍然令人信服。视觉上有吸引力的背面有三种不同的颜色可供选择。令人惊讶的是，我们的黑色测试机，其高光泽的表面，原来并不容易留下指纹。对灰尘和水的保护也得到了认证，至少在符合IP53标准的飞溅物方面。

这款手机的正面由第三代康宁大猩猩显示玻璃制成，与8毫米（约0.3英寸）薄的塑料框架过渡。 6.43英寸大的OLED面板周围的边框对于这个价格范围来说是适中的，导致前面有83.5%的良好显示与表面比率。然而，在84.6%的Redmi Note 11S仍然比Poco智能手机更有效。

尺寸比较

设备--带红外冲击器的Poco M5s

Poco智能手机在设备上显示了其优势。这款中档智能手机的买家不必在没有3.5毫米音频端口、红外辐射器、使用有线耳机的FM收音机或用于非接触式支付的NFC芯片的情况下生活。Poco M5s还允许你通过microSD卡扩展其存储空间，而不失去双SIM卡的功能。

由于Widevine DRM级别被指定为L1，你可以以高清质量观看流媒体服务的视频内容。还支持将显示内容无线传输到外部显示器。还有USB OTG，使其能够识别外部存储媒体。USB 2.0端口使用Type-C插头。

微型SD卡读卡器

使用我们的Angelbird V60参考卡，microSD卡插槽在跨平台磁盘测试中实现了良好的传输速率。在JPEG图像文件的复制测试中，传输速率低于17MB/s，明显慢于 Redmi Note 11S.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	35.73 MB/s +114%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	28.2 MB/s +69%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	16.7 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	14.3 MB/s -14%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	11.84 MB/s -29%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø40.9 (28.8-50.4)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.5 (25.2-45.7)

Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.6 (68.7-77)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø71.4 (33.3-76.8)

软件--小米智能手机与Android 12

Poco M5s交付的是Android 12，与Poco的内部MIUI软件的系统用户界面结合在一起，版本为13。在这次测试时，Poco智能手机拥有2022年11月的安全补丁，这仍然是相当有效的。根据小米安全中心的说法，Poco M5s仍然应该收到安全更新，直到2024年中期。

不幸的是，这家中国制造商对其Android 升级不太慷慨。虽然这款经济实惠的中档智能手机仍然应该被更新到Android 13，但也就到此为止了，Poco M5s不会有超过一次的重大升级。

在MiUI 13的用户界面上，我们没有看到任何广告横幅或弹出式广告，例如在安装一个应用程序时。一般来说，那些所谓的MSA（MIUI系统广告）可以在系统设置中的 "密码和安全 "菜单下相当容易地停用。

通信和GNSS - 配备WiFi 5的Poco M5s

Poco M5s的集成WLAN模块支持符合a/b/g/n/ac的IEEE 802.11标准，不仅可以在2.4GHz的频率范围内通信，还可以在5GHz的频率范围内通信。在家里的网络中，使用Wi-Fi 5标准和我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器，可以实现超过300 Mbit/s的稳固传输率。对于这个价格范围的智能手机来说，所提供的速度和WLAN的稳定性是绝对足够的。

Poco智能手机以LTE速度连接到移动互联网，因为它的 Helio G95并不支持更现代的5G标准。另一方面，Poco M5s可以接入总共12个LTE频段，涵盖了德语国家所有相关的4G频率。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=184, last 2 years)	714 MBit/s +122%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	337 (289^min - 349^max) MBit/s +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	325 (289^min - 340^max) MBit/s +1%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	322 (124^min - 352^max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	321 (304^min - 327^max) MBit/s
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	247 (47^min - 312^max) MBit/s -23%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	234 (203^min - 256^max) MBit/s -27%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=186, last 2 years)	729 MBit/s +106%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	368 (355^min - 384^max) MBit/s +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	364 (176^min - 384^max) MBit/s +3%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	354 (346^min - 360^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	349 (317^min - 362^max) MBit/s -1%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	305 (269^min - 336^max) MBit/s -14%
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	303 (108^min - 372^max) MBit/s -14%

Xiaomi Poco M5s; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø320 (304-327)

Xiaomi Poco M5s; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø354 (346-360)

为了评估实践中的定位能力，我们记录了一条路线，与Garmin Venu 2进行比较。这款中档智能手机仅在单频段GNSS中定位，我们能够通过GPS（L1）、GLONASS（L1）、BeiDou（B1）和Galileo（E1）以及SBAS在测试中建立连接。在户外，它的定位很快就成功了，精确度约为1米（3英尺）。即使在室内，小米智能手机也能迅速找到其位置，但信号非常弱。

尽管Poco M5s的GPS记录并不总是与我们骑车时选择的路线一致，但偏差不大，因此，没有什么可以阻止你使用小米智能手机进行导航。

电话功能和语音质量--小米双SIM卡的智能手机

Poco M5s能够接受最多两个Nano-SIM卡。支持VoLTE和WLAN通话，就像双联通一样。

使用听筒，小米智能手机的语音质量很好，我们的声音也被转移，听起来相当自然。通过Skype测试，Poco M5s在使用立体声扬声器的视频会议中也很有说服力。在这方面，这两个麦克风在日常操作中做得很好。

照相机 - 小米智能手机，64MP

前面的一个冲孔后面隐藏着一个1300万像素的摄像头。在良好的光线条件下，照片的记录质量相当有吸引力。然而，用Poco M5s拍摄的自拍显得相当暗，而且没有什么锐度。在视频方面，由于缺乏4K分辨率，你也不得不接受一些妥协。

作为其主摄像头，Poco M5s使用了来自Omnivision（OV64B）的64MP传感器，我们已经从 Poco F4.它能够以每秒30张图片的速度录制UHD质量的视频。在白天，这个1/2英寸的传感器产生了坚实的图像清晰度和有吸引力的色彩准确性。然而，由于Poco M5s对图像的一些软化，物体的一些细节被丢失。在弱光条件下，照度和图像清晰度与200欧元价格范围内的其他竞争对手相当。然而，传感器捕捉到的周围光线相对较少，而且自动对焦在黑暗中也不能发挥最佳效果。

主摄像头配有一个800万像素的超广角摄像头。与6400万像素的主摄像头相比，广角镜头的记录缺乏清晰度和细节。没有用于变焦记录的长焦镜头，Poco M5s使用一个200万像素的微距摄像头代替。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Hauptkamera Low Light Ultraweitwinkel

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在受控的光线条件下，Poco智能手机也以准确的色彩再现给人留下深刻印象，尽管颜色略微太亮。令人惊讶的是，与实际参考颜色相比，这款价格低廉的小米智能手机并没有显示任何真正的异常值。我们测量的偏差都低于10的ΔE值，这非常好。

ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco M5s: 6.57 ∆E min: 2.77 - max: 9.81 ∆E

配件和保修 - Poco M5s不含充电器

盒子里有一根USB线，一个保护套，以及通常的信息材料。小米没有在其中档智能手机中包含相应的充电器。

在德国，33瓦的充电器只能单独购买。然而，当你从制造商的网站上购买智能手机时，价格为2.99欧元，额外费用非常低。

小米在德国为其手机提供24个月的保修。

输入设备和操作 - 带有FaceUnlock的小米智能手机

Poco M5s的电容式触摸屏能够快速而准确地识别输入，Gorilla Glas 3的滑动特性也令人信服。在交付状态下，制造商安装了一个保护性的箔片，略微容易出现油脂污渍。刷新率只有60赫兹的AMOLED面板使动画或滚动的互联网页面显得不那么流畅，与提供90赫兹甚至120赫兹的经济实惠的中端竞争者相比，略显粗糙。我们可以提到 Poco X4 Pro或一个Redmi Note 11S作为这里的例子。

隐藏在电源按钮中的指纹传感器提供生物识别安全。虽然它的反应相当慢，但它提供了良好的识别率。在良好的光线条件下，通过使用前置摄像头的人脸识别解锁速度稍快，但使用二维识别的安全性较差。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 小米智能手机采用OLED

Poco M5s的显示屏尺寸为6.43英寸，提供2400 x 1080像素的分辨率。根据DRM信息应用，60Hz的OLED显示屏支持HDR10，作为8位面板提供更多的色彩深度和动态。

在我们使用纯白显示屏和激活亮度传感器的测量中，面板亮度达到720cd/m²，这在这个价格级别中是非常好的。亮度也是均匀分布的。在亮区和暗区均匀分布的情况下（APL18），显示屏甚至达到了1047cd/m²。通过这些数值，我们能够确认制造商的规格。

令人惊讶的是，尽管采用了OLED技术，但我们在用示波器进行测量时没有看到任何典型的闪烁现象。最多有一些最小的高频变化。这意味着，我们无法在整个亮度设置范围内找到任何脉宽调制。这种效果可能是由一个恒定的直流调光与一个非常高的频率相结合产生的。与使用低频曲线的OLED显示屏相比，Poco M5s产生问题的可能性至少要低。


712 cd/m²	714 cd/m²	727 cd/m²
709 cd/m²	715 cd/m²	732 cd/m²
709 cd/m²	715 cd/m²	746 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 746 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 719.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.04 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28

	Xiaomi Poco M5s AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"	Samsung Galaxy A13 5G PLS, 1600x720, 6.5"	Honor X8 TFT-LCD, 2388x1080, 6.7"	Motorola Moto G42 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"	Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen		3%	-98%	-47%	24%	15%
Brightness middle	715	430 -40%	471 -34%	510 -29%	691 -3%	687 -4%
Brightness	720	436 -39%	437 -39%	469 -35%	699 -3%	694 -4%
Brightness Distribution	95	97 2%	86 -9%	78 -18%	95 0%	96 1%
Black Level *			0.31	0.82
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.04	1.2 41%	5.43 -166%	2.5 -23%	1.02 50%	1.2 41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.85	2.6 46%	10.55 -118%	5.8 -20%	1.73 64%	4 18%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.6	1.5 6%	5.1 -219%	4.1 -156%	1 37%	1 37%
Gamma	2.28 ^96%	2.23 ^99%	2.12 ^104%	2.45 ^90%	2.205 ^100%	2.16 ^102%
CCT	6488 ^100%	6379 ^102%	7465 ^87%	6307 ^103%	6621 ^98%	6496 ^100%
Contrast			1519	622

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

我们使用照片光谱仪和CalMAN分析软件来检查显示器的色彩还原情况。Poco M5s在预设的 "标准 "色彩配置文件中提供了良好的调整，但即使在sRGB色彩空间中，你仍然可以看到一些色彩的差异。特别是红色和洋红色的色调，其还原度可以更饱和。然而，对于这个价位的产品来说，色彩再现是非常好的，色彩偏差也非常低。

此外，Poco M5s并不缺乏设置选项。用户可以在三个不同的配置文件中进行选择，并在每个配置文件中根据个人喜好调整色温。然而，你不能像小米的高端机型那样单独调整显示参数。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.3 ms rise
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.7 ms rise
3.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

尽管价格低廉，Poco M5s能够处理户外的任何光线条件，提供非常好的可读性--至少在我们测试期间的冬季条件下是这样。由于高亮度，即使在夏天，在阳光直射下使用小米智能手机的唯一障碍可能是玻璃表面的反射。视角稳定性也达到了AMOLED显示屏的预期水平，我们非常喜欢它。

性能 - 配备联发科SoC的Poco M5s

兴发xf187在线娱乐联发科Helio G95 Poco M5s的SoC是采用12纳米工艺制造的，集成了两个Cortex A76内核和六个较小的Cortex A55内核。在我们的基准测试包中，这款小米智能手机的表现也相应较弱。

然而，与这个价格范围内的中档竞争对手相比，Poco M5s提供的性能仍然令人满意。特别是在Geekbench的单核值和PCMark的系统基准测试中，这款中档智能手机明显落后于骁龙695中的 X4 Pro的兄弟姐妹机型。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)	995 Points +94%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	694 Points +36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	528 Points +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (506 - 532, n=6)	515 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	512 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	445 Points -13%
Honor X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144	379 Points -26%
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	376 Points -27%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)	3312 Points +86%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	2038 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	1863 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	1778 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (1622 - 1778, n=6)	1684 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1583 Points -11%
Honor X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144	1571 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1071 Points -40%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)	798401 Points +144%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	383847 Points +18%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (326670 - 330876, n=2)	328773 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	326670 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	297002 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	243323 Points -26%
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	238371 Points -27%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)	12976 Points +63%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	10571 Points +33%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (7938 - 10373, n=4)	8820 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	8115 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	7938 Points
Honor X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144	7645 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	6962 Points -12%
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	6176 Points -22%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)	884 Points +218%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	604 Points +117%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	440 Points +58%
Honor X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144	413 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	371 Points +33%
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	325 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	278 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G95 ()	278 Points 0%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +97%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3794 Points +19%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	3198 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2794 Points -13%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (1566 - 3198, n=4)	2750 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	2696 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2564 Points -20%
System
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +74%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	7736 Points +33%
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	5852 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	5830 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	5016 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	4917 Points -16%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (2083 - 5830, n=4)	4602 Points -21%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +70%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4593 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	3984 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3824 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	3669 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	3280 Points -18%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (1012 - 4108, n=4)	3216 Points -19%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +354%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4401 Points +18%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	3728 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (3178 - 3807, n=4)	3579 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	2763 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2535 Points -32%
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2181 Points -41%
Web
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +28%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1283 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1279 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	1221 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	1163 Points -5%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (898 - 1288, n=4)	1149 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	923 Points -24%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)	16841 Points +97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	9119 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	8538 Points
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	7638 Points -11%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (5923 - 8538, n=2)	7231 Points -15%

在图形加速方面，Poco M5s使用一个集成的 ARM Mali G76 MP4，这是一个2018年的GPU。尽管这个事实，小米智能手机在我们的性能评级中取得了前列的位置。特别是在3DMark基准测试和GFX Bench的屏幕外数值方面，Poco M5s表现得非常好。

Performance Rating
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	90.3 pt
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	90.1 pt
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	82.8 pt
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	66.3 pt
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	41.5 pt
Honor X8 ^-14! Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	37.6 pt

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	418 Points
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	371 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	312 Points -25%
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	124 Points -70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Points -100%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	421 Points
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	362 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	326 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	326 Points -23%
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	127 Points -70%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	125 Points -70%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1476 Points
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1227 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1116 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1003 Points -32%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	443 Points -70%
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	442 Points -70%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1434 Points
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1292 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1203 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1181 Points -18%
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	456 Points -68%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	445 Points -69%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2765 Points
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2736 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2612 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2476 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2168 Points -22%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2821 Points
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2731 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2330 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2286 Points -19%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1121 Points -60%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2856 Points
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2738 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2387 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2259 Points -21%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1276 Points -55%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3581 Points
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3512 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3179 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2814 Points -21%
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2571 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2434 Points -32%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2998 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2745 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2341 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2331 Points -15%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1191 Points -57%
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1186 Points -57%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3092 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2855 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2478 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2361 Points -17%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1366 Points -52%
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1347 Points -53%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2983 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2786 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2415 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2383 Points -14%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1339 Points -52%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2836 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2644 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2303 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2280 Points -14%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1170 Points -56%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3527 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3389 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2908 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2829 Points -17%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2707 Points -20%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	82 fps +39%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	65 fps +10%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	59 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	52 fps -12%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps -41%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	94 fps +11%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	85 fps
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	65 fps -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	63 fps -26%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	41 fps -52%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	58 fps +23%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	42 fps -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	31 fps -34%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps -57%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	53 fps
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	39 fps -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	38 fps -28%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps -58%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	48 fps +66%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	30 fps +3%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps -31%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps -52%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps +9%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	32 fps
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	25 fps -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps -22%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -53%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	25 fps +47%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps -29%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.4 fps -56%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -29%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.3 fps -60%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	17 fps +55%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps +9%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.5 fps -23%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5 fps -55%
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4.6 fps -58%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.1 fps +7%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.6 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.7 fps -25%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.6 fps -26%
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3.2 fps -58%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.2 fps -58%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	28 fps +56%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps +6%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -28%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.5 fps -53%
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	7.8 fps -57%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	16 fps -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps -27%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.7 fps -56%
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	9.5 fps -57%

使用这款中端智能手机浏览网页基本顺利，尽管加载时间可能相当长。在基准测试中，小米智能手机在我们的对比设备中处于中下水平。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +137%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)	64.534 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G (Chrome 106)	53.56 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco M5s (Chrome 107)	50.839 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97)	42.542 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	41.845 Points -18%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (16.9 - 50.8, n=5)	36.4 Points -28%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +307%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)	42.4 runs/min +27%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G (Chome 106)	41.7 runs/min +24%
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	37.8 runs/min +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97)	34.4 runs/min +3%
Xiaomi Poco M5s (Chrome 107)	33.5 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (14.7 - 34.2, n=4)	29.1 runs/min -13%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)	113.8 Points +185%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)	65 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G (Chrome 106)	52 Points +30%
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	43 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97)	42 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco M5s (Chrome 107)	40 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G95 ()	40 Points 0%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +181%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro	94 Points +77%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G (Chrome 106)	65 Points +23%
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	59 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97)	55 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco M5s	53 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (28 - 57, n=5)	48 Points -9%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +143%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)	22938 Points +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97)	17394 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G (Chrome 106)	16871 Points +10%
Xiaomi Poco M5s (Chrome 107)	15289 Points
Honor X8 (Chrome 103)	13141 Points -14%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (4808 - 16289, n=4)	13050 Points -15%
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	12364 Points -19%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (2673 - 10797, n=5)	4586 ms * -65%
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	3341.4 ms * -20%
Xiaomi Poco M5s (Chrome 107)	2783.3 ms *
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97)	2773.2 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G (Chrome 106)	2259.8 ms * +19%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)	1982.32 ms * +29%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +44%

* ... smaller is better

Poco M5s的64GB UFS存储空间只提供了一般的读写速度，特别是在小数据块的测试中。对于这个价格范围来说，其速度低于平均水平，但这也可以追溯到低存储带宽的 Helio G95.这款手机 Realme 7和摩托G60s使用相同的SoC，在这里显示出类似的糟糕表现。

	Xiaomi Poco M5s	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S	Samsung Galaxy A13 5G	Honor X8	Motorola Moto G42	Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro	Average 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		39%	-40%	55%	31%	19%	30%	200%
Sequential Read 256KB	507.89	524.39 3%	289.7 -43%	926.58 82%	843.09 66%	303.4 -40%	770 ?(485 - 979, n=18) 52%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 262%
Sequential Write 256KB	376.97	446.46 18%	176.7 -53%	510.25 35%	436.32 16%	483.33 28%	399 ?(120.6 - 519, n=18) 6%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 278%
Random Read 4KB	132.77	214.82 62%	86.2 -35%	189.38 43%	122.08 -8%	193.45 46%	156.6 ?(88.5 - 220, n=18) 18%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 109%
Random Write 4KB	123.92	216.24 74%	90.9 -27%	195.75 58%	186.23 50%	173.03 40%	177.7 ?(95.4 - 216, n=18) 43%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 149%

游戏--Poco M5s可管理60帧的画面

尽管马里G76 MP4 在这里使用的Mali G76 MP4已经略显老旧，但其图形性能，我们通过我们的合作伙伴GameBench进行测试。对于一些来自Play Store的Android 游戏，应该还是足够的。

PUBG Mobile，我们的第一个测试游戏，只能在中等细节水平下进行，而且你不能用Poco M5s选择UHD设置。另一方面，除了一些孤立的下降之外，射击游戏以相对稳定的30帧的速度再现。在最低的细节水平，它甚至达到40帧。

Armajet被限制在60帧，这并不是很令人惊讶，因为Poco智能手机的原生刷新率只有60赫兹。但更令人惊讶的是，除了帧率下降到40帧外，竞技场射击游戏的再现没有任何较大变化。即使是小米高端最近也缺乏这样的恒定性。

不过，要求非常高的游戏，如《元神冲击》，在Poco M5s上确实不能玩。

Xiaomi Poco M5s; Armajet: Ø59.3 (40-61)

Xiaomi Poco M5s; Genshin Impact: Ø17 (4-25)

Xiaomi Poco M5s; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø38.4 (29-41)

Xiaomi Poco M5s; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø37.7 (27-41)

Xiaomi Poco M5s; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.3 (18-31)

排放 - 小米智能手机保持凉爽

温度

在日常操作中，小米智能手机在适度使用的情况下几乎不会发热。然而，如果你对Poco M5s提出更高的要求，热量的发展是非常不平衡的。当我们在前置摄像头的区域测量到一个近47°C（117°F）的热点时，外壳的底部区域仍然明显较冷，不到33°C（91°F）。

有趣的是，这款经济型智能手机内部的热量发展到什么程度会导致节流。为了评估Poco M5s在持续负载下的行为，我们使用GFXBench应用程序的电池测试和3DMark的Wild Life压力测试。曼哈顿3.1测试显示，随着负载的增加，帧率保持相对稳定。在3DMark测试中，Poco智能手机也保持非常稳定，所以负载下的性能下降是不太可能的。

Max. Load

Idle


46.6 °C	37.6 °C	32.7 °C
45.3 °C	37.3 °C	32.8 °C
43.3 °C	36.4 °C	32.7 °C

Maximum: 46.6 °C
Average: 38.3 °C


30.6 °C	35.5 °C	39.5 °C
31.7 °C	36.1 °C	41.2 °C
32.5 °C	36.2 °C	40.3 °C

Maximum: 41.2 °C
Average: 36 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.5 % +5%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.4 % +5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	99.2 % +5%
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.1 % +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99 % +4%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	94.9 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.2 % +1%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.1 % +1%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98 %
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	97.9 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	97.7 % 0%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	97.3 % -1%

Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.49 (2.47-2.52)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø1.969 (1.96-1.976)

Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.972 (1.939-1.986)

Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø0.753 (0.745-0.76)

Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø0.733 (0.725-0.746)

Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)

Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.88 (8.54-9)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø6.96 (6.93-7)

Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.25 (7.22-7.28)

Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø2.68 (2.66-2.68)

Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.67 (2.66-2.68)

Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.25 (7.24-7.28)

发言人

小米这款经济实惠的中档智能手机有两个扬声器，其音质在这个价格级别上令人满意。音乐的再现在中音和高音部分是相当线性的，但在声谱的低频部分有明显的下降。

Poco M5s的用户不必在没有3.5毫米音频端口的情况下生活。那些喜欢无线解决方案的人可以通过蓝牙5.0实现。在编解码方面，支持aptX和aptX HD、LDAC、AAC和LHDC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Poco M5s audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 小米智能手机，5000毫安时

消耗功率

虽然Poco智能手机不支持无线充电，但你可以使用高达33瓦的快速充电。据小米公司称，有了它，一个耗尽的电池高达64%的充电应该在30分钟内完成。

耗电量不是Poco M5s的优势。在空闲操作期间，这款中档智能手机的耗电量相对较大，为1.5瓦，而且在负载情况下，耗电高峰也很明显。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.1 Watt
Idle	1.2 / 1.5 / 1.8 Watt
Load	6.5 / 8.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Poco M5s 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A13 5G 5000 mAh	Motorola Moto G42 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5000 mAh	Average Mediatek Helio G95	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		16%	32%	23%	20%	-0%	6%
Idle Minimum *	1.2	0.89 26%	1 17%	1 17%	1.01 16%	1.273 ?(0.69 - 2.5, n=4) -6%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) 25%
Idle Average *	1.5	1.87 -25%	1.1 27%	1.5 -0%	1.73 -15%	1.865 ?(0.9 - 3.6, n=4) -24%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 3%
Idle Maximum *	1.8	1.9 -6%	1.2 33%	2 -11%	1.79 1%	2.05 ?(1.2 - 3.7, n=4) -14%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 10%
Load Average *	6.5	3.01 54%	3.4 48%	2.6 60%	3.05 53%	4.87 ?(3.67 - 6.5, n=4) 25%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) 1%
Load Maximum *	8.9	6.26 30%	5.6 37%	4.5 49%	4.91 45%	7.32 ?(5.58 - 8.9, n=4) 18%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -10%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.96 (3.13-10.5)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.86 (1.049-8.74)

Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.592 (1.481-1.793)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.144 (1.097-1.297)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.05 (7.52-8.66)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.24 (2.98-3.62)

Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.592 (1.481-1.793)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.144 (1.097-1.297)

电池寿命

在我们的电池测试中，Poco M5s使用的5000毫安时的电池确保了非常长的运行时间。在WLAN测试中，智能手机的显示屏在大约17小时后关闭，在不断播放视频时，小米智能手机的持续时间也很长，超过22小时。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		34h 48min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 106)		16h 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		22h 04min
Load (maximum brightness)		6h 22min

	Xiaomi Poco M5s 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A13 5G 5000 mAh	Honor X8 4000 mAh	Motorola Moto G42 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-19%	6%	-15%	-1%	-15%
Reader / Idle	2088	1663 -20%	2799 34%		2223 6%	1575 -25%
H.264	1324	971 -27%	1229 -7%		1185 -10%	1033 -22%
WiFi v1.3	1011	725 -28%	1102 9%	858 -15%	949 -6%	739 -27%
Load	382	376 -2%	334 -13%		406 6%	432 13%

Pros

+ 明亮的AMOLED面板

+ 没有典型的OLED闪烁现象

+ 电池寿命长

+ 广泛的设备

+ IP等级

Cons

- 只有60-Hz的面板

- 不包括充电器

- 弱的SoC

- 没有5G

对Poco M5s的评判

通过Poco M5s，小米成功地在低价位段提供了一个坚实的中档智能手机。我们的测试揭示了这个本来不起眼的Poco智能手机的亮点，它显示了与M5s的许多相似之处。 Redmi Note 11S:这就是明亮的AMOLED显示屏，尽管使用了OLED技术，但令人惊讶的是，它没有显示任何OLED典型的闪烁。这显然是一个独特的卖点，应该得到对PWM敏感的用户的赞赏。然而，那些重视良好的相机和流畅的显示屏的人应该仔细看看我们对红米兄弟姐妹机型的测试。

由于其明亮和无闪烁的面板，Poco M5s是中档竞争对手的一个有趣的选择。遗憾的是，小米没有在智能手机中加入相应的快速充电器。

另一方面，由于60Hz的显示屏和缺乏5G接入，你也必须接受Poco M5s的一些妥协。那些因为这两个限制而失去考虑资格的人，应该看看价格稍高的 Poco X4 Pro.你也可以用相对较短的软件支持来反对小米的智能手机。这个价格级别的其他竞争对手，如摩托罗拉Moto G42显示，至少在安全更新方面，即使预算有限，也可以做到更多。

价格和可用性

Poco M5s可在非美国国家使用，亚马逊，售价233美元.

Xiaomi Poco M5s - 12/03/2022 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

83%

Keyboard

66 / 75 → 88%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

47 / 70 → 68%

Weight

90%

Battery

92%

Display

83%

Games Performance

33 / 64 → 51%

Application Performance

73 / 86 → 84%

Temperature

88%

Noise

100%

Audio

74 / 90 → 82%

Camera

57%

Average

75%

81%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米Poco M5s智能手机评测--中端智能手机拥有明亮的OLED显示屏，无PWM闪烁现象

Marcus Herbrich, 2022-12-10 (Update: 2024-08-15)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 小米智能手机的冲孔

尺寸比较

设备--带红外冲击器的Poco M5s

微型SD卡读卡器

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

软件--小米智能手机与Android 12

通信和GNSS - 配备WiFi 5的Poco M5s

电话功能和语音质量--小米双SIM卡的智能手机

照相机 - 小米智能手机，64MP

配件和保修 - Poco M5s不含充电器

输入设备和操作 - 带有FaceUnlock的小米智能手机

显示屏 - 小米智能手机采用OLED

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 配备联发科SoC的Poco M5s

游戏--Poco M5s可管理60帧的画面

排放 - 小米智能手机保持凉爽

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Xiaomi Poco M5s audio analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S audio analysis

电池寿命 - 小米智能手机，5000毫安时

消耗功率

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

对Poco M5s的评判

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison