华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 评测--这款智能手机是每个游戏玩家的首选
启用人工智能。
ROG Phone 已经更上一层楼,速度比以往任何时候都快。但即使在游戏之外,它在日常生活中的表现也有所改进,更新时间更长,人工智能功能更强大。我们的评测揭示了它的不足之处。Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
评价 - 只有相机不是一流的
ROG Phone 9 Pro 是一款非常成功的升级机型。不出所料,华硕选择了全新的骁龙 8 精英版,并成功地保持了几乎完美的散热效果。如果你想提高几个百分点的性能,可拆卸的散热器可以满足你的要求。
我们已经看到其他制造商采用了新的人工智能功能,但它们仍然丰富了这款游戏智能手机--华硕还在游戏中使用它们来帮助实现流程自动化。
如果您追求的是强悍的性能,那么 ROG Phone 9 Pro 就是您的不二之选。除此之外,它还提供超长的电池续航时间、亮度高达 185 Hz 的 AMOLED 显示屏、久经考验的 AirTrigger、无线充电和所有型号的 IP 认证。摄像头经过了全新设计,但使用了相对较小的传感器,这在弱光环境下非常明显。此外,华硕只打算发布两次重大更新,这在同价位产品中是相当少的。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
目前,华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 可直接从华硕eStore 购买。.
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB | Amazon: 1. $10.99 MOOISVS [2 Pack] for Asus RO... 2. $11.99 NOUKAJU Screen Protector for... 3. $5.35 Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit... List Price: 1499€ | 227 g | 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" 2400x1080 388 PPI AMOLED | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $9.59 Ibywind 2 Pack Screen Protec... 2. $7.59 Natbok 2 Pack Tempered Glass... 3. $9.59 Guizzcg 2 Pack Screen Protec... List Price: 799€ | 229 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.80" 2480x1116 400 PPI AMOLED | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB | Amazon: 1. $9.59 Ibywind 2 Pack Screen Protec... 2. $9.90 Anbzsign [2+2 Pack for ASUS ... 3. $5.35 Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit... List Price: 1499€ | 225 g | 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" 2400x1080 388 PPI OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: List Price: 1449€ | 232 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.80" 3120x1440 505 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro ⎘ Apple A18 Pro GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe | Amazon: 1. $37.00 Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Clea... 2. $1,439.96 iPhone 16 Pro Max / 256GB / ... 3. $6.78 Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto... List Price: 1449€ | 227 g | 256 GB NVMe | 6.90" 2868x1320 458 PPI Super Retina XDR OLED | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. AKABEILA [1 Pack Privacy Scr... 2. $4.11 AKABEILA 1 Pack Screen Prote... 3. $15.99 AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr... List Price: 1199€ | 215 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" 2780x1264 450 PPI AMOLED |
Table of Contents
- 评价 - 只有相机不是一流的
- 规格
- 外壳 - 大猩猩 Glas Victus 2 和 IP68 认证
- 功能 - ROG Phone 9 有两个 USB 端口和 AirTrigger。
- 软件 -Android 15 和五年更新
- 通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 精确定位、Wi-Fi 7 和 5G
- 电话功能和语音质量
- 摄像头 - ROG Phone 9 Pro 依靠索尼 Lytia 700
- 配件和保修 - 装得满满当当的大箱子
- 输入设备和操作 - 光学指纹传感器和附加按钮选项
- 显示屏 - 高达 185 Hz 的明亮 AMOLED 显示屏
- 性能 - ROG Phone 9 尽享 Snapdragon 8 Elite 的强大性能
- 游戏 - 无限游戏,储备丰富
- 排放 - Snapdragon 声音和稳定的性能
- 电池寿命 - 华硕 ROG Phone 9 和 5,800 毫安时
- Notebookcheck 总体评分
ROG Phone 9 Pro 是继 ROG Phone 8 Pro从外观上看,ROG Phone 9 Pro 并无太大变化。华硕游戏手机系列有三种型号,其中最便宜的型号(不含 Pro 附加功能)不仅在内存和附加功能方面不得不做出妥协,在摄像头设置方面也是如此。廉价版 ROG Phone 9 的光学变焦被微距镜头取代。此外,背面的 LED 显示屏也变小了(85 点)。
,ROG Phone 9 Pro 目前的起售价为 1199 美元。它的内存容量为 16/512 GB。配备 Edition 附加组件的机型内存容量为 24/1,024 GB,还包括全新的 AeroActive Cooler X Pro。我们的评测设备是华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro Edition(建议零售价:1499 美元)。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 大猩猩 Glas Victus 2 和 IP68 认证
华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 的特点是沿袭了前代产品的简约设计,只进行了最小程度的优化,有魅影黑和暴风白两种颜色(仅限非 Pro 机型)。华硕重新设计了机身背面的圆点显示屏,现在它包括 648 个迷你 LED 灯,关闭时不可见。
华硕智能手机的正面和背面均由康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 构成,边框由哑光铝合金制成。玻璃后部也基本采用了磨砂处理,因此指纹问题也就不攻自破了。
做工令人印象深刻,缝隙紧密均匀。ROG Phone 9 Pro 在扭动时也能保持静音。它还符合 IP68 防水和防尘标准。
功能 - ROG Phone 9 有两个 USB 端口和 AirTrigger。
ROG Phone 9 Pro 有两个 USB 端口。长边的一个是 USB 3.2(Gen.1),它还可以通过线缆将内容传输到外部屏幕,在拷贝测试中达到了近 300 MB/s。第二个 USB 采用 2.0 标准。这两个接口都具有 OTG 和快速充电功能。
虽然不能使用 microSD 卡进行内存扩展,但 ROG Phone 仍有一个音频插孔连接(3.5 毫米)。AirTrigger 超声波传感器表面也再次搭载,可用作游戏中的附加输入元素。
软件 -Android 15 和五年更新
ROG Phone 9 Pro 预装了谷歌Android 15,在此基础上,华硕可选择应用其 ROG UI。另外,也可以选择纯Android 。安全补丁的更新支持时间超过五年,但华硕仍然只提供两个版本的升级,即升级到Android 17。
华硕现在首次在其智能手机中实现了人工智能功能。除 Circle to Search 外,还包括通话过程中的实时翻译、转录功能、AI 壁纸和图库中的语义图像搜索。没有预装第三方应用程序。
Amory Crate 应用程序可用于调整后置微型 LED 点阵显示屏、进行基于应用程序的性能设置或配置 AeroActive Cooler 等。
可持续性
华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 版的包装相当华丽,不仅完全由纸板制成,而且还用塑料薄膜包裹。
华硕目前不提供免费的维修说明或备件。因此,智能手机必须送修。此外,还缺少有关二氧化碳排放量的信息。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 精确定位、Wi-Fi 7 和 5G
所有现行标准都可用于移动数据传输,包括频率覆盖面广的 5G-Sub6。这意味着在全球任何国家访问移动网络都不会有任何问题。使用无线网络时,
Wi-Fi 7 的三个频段均可使用。结合我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000,ROG Phone 9 Pro 实现了稳定的传输速度,但在 5 GHz 网络中接收数据时速度出奇地慢。
Networking | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average Wi-Fi 7 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
在室外,卫星修复工作非常迅速,华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 能够确认高信号强度。在室内则需要更长的时间,而且正如预期的那样,信号较弱。不过,位置确定仍然可以进行。
在一次自行车旅行中,我们将这款游戏智能手机与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表进行了比较。总的来说,华硕手机的路线跟踪效果很好,只是在细节上有一些小偏差。在日常情况下,您应该期待它完美无瑕的性能。
电话功能和语音质量
华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 可以容纳两张 nano-SIM 卡,但在欧洲不支持 eSIM。支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话等功能。集成人工智能的通话翻译功能仍处于测试阶段,但已经运行良好,与 Galaxy S24 Ultra.简单的对话翻译得通俗易懂,但当涉及到更复杂的问题时,人工智能很快就会达到极限。这款智能手机还可以录制对话。
语音质量很好,大多数背景噪音都能被有效抑制。只有在噪音较大的情况下,才会有声音传出,这导致用户更难理解。在扬声器模式下,ROG Phone 9 Pro 的麦克风范围相当大,表现也不错。
摄像头 - ROG Phone 9 Pro 依靠索尼 Lytia 700
华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 的前置摄像头采用了像素二进制技术,即把标称 3200 万像素的照片合成约 800 万像素,以实现更高的感光度。即使没有自动对焦,其效果也令人印象深刻,整体构图均匀。
三摄像头的核心是一个相对较小的索尼 Lytia 700 传感器,通过云台 OIS 进行稳定。特写镜头有明显的红色调,图像边缘略显模糊。暗处的细节会丢失,但照片仍然很吸引人。华硕成功地从传感器中获得了很多信息,但技术限制也很明显。
超广角镜头与该设置相辅相成,其成像性能向边缘下降,畸变也变得明显。不过,景深效果还不错。第三支镜头是三倍光学变焦(最大 30 倍数码变焦),但由于其传感器非常小,因此大量的百万像素也无济于事。日光下光学成像性能不错,但放大五倍后质量明显下降。
,ROG Phone 9 Pro 可录制最高 8k(30fps)的视频;如果需要 60fps,就只能用超高清或更低的帧率了。云台防抖功能在测试中令人印象深刻,但仅限于全高清。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide-angle5x zoomLow light华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 的色彩还原在可控光照条件下非常自然,没有出现大的偏差。
测试图的锐度稍有欠缺,即使是在图像的中间部分。
配件和保修 - 装得满满当当的大箱子
华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 版的包装盒内含一个 65 瓦模块化充电器、一条 USB-C 编织线、一个 SIM 卡工具、一个 AeroActive Cooler X Pro 散热器和一个便携包以及两个保护套。
另外,华硕还宣传了自家的Tessen 控制器(零售价:89 美元),它拥有时尚的 Aura RGB 灯光,据称可以实现无延迟输入。
在德国的保修期为 24 个月,不能延长。
输入设备和操作 - 光学指纹传感器和附加按钮选项
华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 的电容式触摸屏的采样率高达 720 Hz,这意味着输入总是能快速实现。光学指纹传感器也集成在显示屏中,识别率很高,能快速解锁智能手机。此外,还可通过前置摄像头进行安全性较低的面部识别,在光线充足的条件下也能快速识别。
设备长边的 AirTriggers 是超声波传感器,可在游戏和系统本身中配置为附加输入元素。它们的工作既快速又可靠。如果你需要更多的按键,你可以通过 AeroActive Cooler X Pro 获得,它还提供时尚的 RGB 灯光效果,并与热电冷却系统配合使用。在满载情况下,噪音会相当大,可能会突破 60 分贝(A)的限制。
显示屏 - 高达 185 Hz 的明亮 AMOLED 显示屏
ROG Phone 9 Pro 的 6.8 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏具有全高清+分辨率,因此能够提供良好的图像清晰度。LTPO 功能可自动将刷新率调整为 1 至 120 Hz,也可手动固定为 165 Hz。185 Hz 刷新率只能通过 Game Genie 直接用于兼容游戏。
在激活环境光传感器和纯白显示屏的情况下,面板亮度已经很高,达到 1,682 cd/m²。如果使用较小的白色区域(APL18),亮度会更高,达到 2,455 cd/m²。在播放 HDR 视频时,我们甚至能达到 2,579 cd/m²。任何希望手动调节亮度的用户都可以获得最高 802 cd/m² 的亮度。不过,最低亮度也达到了 6 cd/m²,在黑暗中也会非常明亮。
我们测得的 PWM 调光频率相对较高,为 670 Hz,但这还不足以让眼睛感到舒适。设置中的闪烁保护功能使振幅曲线更加平缓(见信息框中的第二张截图),但也能看到轻微的偏红色调。
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1682 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.8" | Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.8" | Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro OLED, 2400x1080, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.8" | Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Super Retina XDR OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9" | Oppo Find X8 Pro AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -9% | -43% | -76% | -46% | 0% | |
Brightness middle | 1682 | 1035 -38% | 1699 1% | 1317 -22% | 1055 -37% | 1167 -31% |
Brightness | 1685 | 1031 -39% | 1698 1% | 1365 -19% | 1061 -37% | 1160 -31% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 96 -1% | 98 1% | 94 -3% | 93 -4% | 98 1% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1 9% | 1.9 -73% | 3.4 -209% | 1.5 -36% | 0.87 21% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.1 | 1.9 10% | 4.7 -124% | 5 -138% | 4.7 -124% | 1.64 22% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1.6 6% | 2.8 -65% | 2.8 -65% | 2.3 -35% | 1.4 18% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.25 98% | 2.26 97% | 2 110% | 2.21 100% | 2.311 95% |
CCT | 6581 99% | 6368 102% | 6648 98% | 6458 101% | 6625 98% | 6426 101% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 670 Hz Amplitude: 16.13 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 670 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 670 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
使用固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看)。
如果在设置中选择 "StandardSplendid profile"(标准辉煌配置文件),你将看到由较小的 sRGB 色彩空间控制的自然色彩表现。在出厂设置中,ROG Phone 9 Pro 使用 DCI-P3 作为色彩空间,显示效果略微偏冷。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.7735 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.441 ms rise | |
↘ 0.3325 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6165 ms rise | |
↘ 1.005 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
在室外和大多数情况下,ROG Phone 9 Pro 仍然非常易于阅读。不过,在大多数光线条件下,亮度应该足够。
华硕游戏智能手机的视角稳定性特别好。在广视角下,亮度仅有轻微下降,并能看到轻微的绿雾。但这两种情况在日常生活中都不成问题。
性能 - ROG Phone 9 尽享 Snapdragon 8 Elite 的强大性能
华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 采用高通公司最快的 SoC,即 骁龙 8 精英版.该芯片最初只依赖于性能内核,两个最快内核的最高时钟频率为 4.32 GHz。我们的评测设备可使用 24 GB LPDDR5x 内存。
在 CPU 速度方面,Snapdragon 和 Dimensity 9400击败了最强劲的竞争对手。此外,华硕智能手机的高级系统速度也给人留下了深刻印象,但令人惊讶的是,在人工智能基准测试方面却没有达到预期。
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite () | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 75143, n=146, last 2 years) |
Geekbench AI | |
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (191 - 4619, n=35, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite () | |
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (192 - 32432, n=35, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite () | |
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (118 - 44657, n=35, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite () |
图形计算由集成在 SoC 中的 Adreno 830 处理。在 3DMark 中,与前代产品相比,性能提高了 Adreno 750的性能提升并不明显。相比之下,在 GFXBench 中,我们看到的是令人印象深刻的 27% 到 65% 的性能提升。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
使用华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 上网非常流畅,毫不费力。在基准测试中,它始终名列前三分之一,只有在与 iPhone.
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (241 - 280, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121) | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120) | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Chrome 120) | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite () | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121) | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120) | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Chrome 120) | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years) |
Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (25.9 - 34, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=61, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121) | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite () | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84) | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120) | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=155, last 2 years) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (72825 - 92494, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121) | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120) | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Chrome 120) | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84) | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84) | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Chrome 120) | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120) | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121) | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (422 - 574, n=2) | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) |
* ... smaller is better
华硕在存储方面采用了快速的 UFS 4.0 标准,在所有方面都能达到很高的传输速度。
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | Oppo Find X8 Pro | Average 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -1% | -4% | -33% | -30% | -10% | -51% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 4026.96 | 4164.08 3% | 4016.67 0% | 3610.25 -10% | 3482.9 -14% | 3597 ? -11% | 1867 ? -54% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 3773.6 | 3199.98 -15% | 3153.4 -16% | 1893.63 -50% | 3498.5 -7% | 3399 ? -10% | 1451 ? -62% |
Random Read 4KB | 441.13 | 442.82 0% | 434.63 -1% | 437.12 -1% | 375.7 -15% | 402 ? -9% | 279 ? -37% |
Random Write 4KB | 637.2 | 691.17 8% | 648 2% | 181.55 -72% | 100.4 -84% | 579 ? -9% | 311 ? -51% |
游戏 - 无限游戏,储备丰富
华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 性能出众,并通过触摸屏的高采样率、立体声扬声器和 AirTriggers 加以补充。可拆卸散热器的设计可使性能保持更长时间的稳定,同时还提供了额外的按键。
我们使用GameBench 对游戏性能进行了分析。.即使在要求较高的游戏《源氏冲击》中,它在最高级别的细节设置下也能达到稳定的 60fps。华硕智能手机在《PUBG Mobile》中的表现也绝对稳定,在最低细节设置下也能显示 120fps。
不过,185 Hz 仅适用于少数游戏(见截图),不过也有一些突出的游戏。在Armoury Crate应用程序中,华硕列出了支持高帧率游戏的每款游戏。
排放 - Snapdragon 声音和稳定的性能
温度
在持续负载的情况下,华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 的最高温度可达 49 °C。虽然温度很高,但无需担心。
在这种情况下,由于华硕智能手机的骁龙处理器几乎不会出现节流现象,因此它甚至表现出了良好的散热性能。3DMark 压力测试证明了这一点,令人印象深刻。使用夹式散热器的用户甚至可以持续发挥其性能。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Stress Tests
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (0.0.0.0) | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (0.0.0.0) | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro (0.0.0.0) | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (1.1.4.1) | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (1.1.4.1) | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (1.1.4.1) | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (1.1.4.1) | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro (1.1.4.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (1.1.4.1) | |
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (1.0.6.5) | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (1.0.11.1) | |
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (1.0.6.5) | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro (1.0.11.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (1.0.6.5) | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (1.1.1.3, with Fan) | |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (1.1.1.3) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (1.0.0.15) | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Oppo Find X8 Pro (1.1.1.3) |
发言人
ROG Phone 9 Pro 的两个扬声器由 Dirac 调校,虽然声音强劲有力,但在最大音量时,中音可以更突出一些。不过,在较小的音量下,它们听起来要和谐得多。
通过 USB 或音频插孔连接,可以输出高保真音频,后者在测试中几乎没有失真。华硕手机还充分利用了其无线功能,提供广泛的编解码器支持,包括 aptX Lossless。
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 华硕 ROG Phone 9 和 5,800 毫安时
耗电量
功耗需要改进,尤其是在显示屏亮度最低的情况下空闲运行时,不过这也是由于最低亮度相对较高的缘故。在满负荷运行时,华硕没有对其游戏智能手机进行任何限制,因此功耗也相当高。
ROG Phone 9 Pro 的 5,800 毫安时电池可通过电缆以高达 65 瓦的功率充电。在测试中,充满电需要整整 50 分钟,17 分钟就能充满 50%,31 分钟就能充满 80%。无线充电也是可行的。不过,最大功率为 15 瓦,充电速度要慢得多。
Off / Standby | 0.14 / 0.38 Watt |
Idle | 0.99 / 1.08 / 1.14 Watt |
Load |
12.97 / 19.21 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro 5800 mAh | Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro 5500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra 5000 mAh | Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4685 mAh | Oppo Find X8 Pro 5910 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 26% | -4% | 17% | 35% | -2% | 7% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.99 | 0.82 17% | 0.73 26% | 0.42 58% | 0.6 39% | 0.788 ? 20% | 0.885 ? 11% |
Idle Average * | 1.08 | 0.96 11% | 1.22 -13% | 1.55 -44% | 0.8 26% | 1.498 ? -39% | 1.451 ? -34% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.14 | 1.19 -4% | 1.34 -18% | 1.58 -39% | 0.9 21% | 1.555 ? -36% | 1.608 ? -41% |
Load Average * | 12.97 | 7.3 44% | 16.52 -27% | 3.41 74% | 6.8 48% | 10.1 ? 22% | 6.55 ? 49% |
Load Maximum * | 19.21 | 7.3 62% | 16.58 14% | 11.82 38% | 10.9 43% | 14.8 ? 23% | 9.92 ? 48% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池运行时间
与上一代产品相比,ROG Phone 9 Pro 的功耗在各方面都有所改进,但如果能提高效率,续航时间肯定会更长。
最好的对比方法是使用适应的显示屏亮度(150 cd/m2)进行测试,在这方面,华硕智能手机仅次于 OPPO Find X8 Pro.
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro 5800 mAh | Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro 6500 mAh | Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro 5500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra 5000 mAh | Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4685 mAh | Oppo Find X8 Pro 5910 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -18% | -17% | 2% | 46% | 37% | |
Reader / Idle | 3040 | 2377 -22% | 2227 -27% | 4226 39% | 3665 21% | |
H.264 | 1648 | 1497 -9% | 1922 17% | 1990 21% | 1976 20% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 1262 | 1036 -18% | 929 -26% | 1148 -9% | 1249 -1% | 1411 12% |
Load | 160 | 140 -12% | 202 26% | 357 123% | 309 93% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
在性能方面,ROG Phone 9 Pro 会有一些优势,但在摄像头方面稍弱,而且更新支持时间可能更长。
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
- 11/26/2024 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.