Notebookcheck Logo
(image source: Daniel Schmidt)

华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 评测--这款智能手机是每个游戏玩家的首选

启用人工智能。

ROG Phone 已经更上一层楼,速度比以往任何时候都快。但即使在游戏之外,它在日常生活中的表现也有所改进,更新时间更长,人工智能功能更强大。我们的评测揭示了它的不足之处。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Gaming Smartphone Touchscreen

评价 - 只有相机不是一流的

ROG Phone 9 Pro 是一款非常成功的升级机型。不出所料,华硕选择了全新的骁龙 8 精英版,并成功地保持了几乎完美的散热效果。如果你想提高几个百分点的性能,可拆卸的散热器可以满足你的要求。

我们已经看到其他制造商采用了新的人工智能功能,但它们仍然丰富了这款游戏智能手机--华硕还在游戏中使用它们来帮助实现流程自动化。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

如果您追求的是强悍的性能,那么 ROG Phone 9 Pro 就是您的不二之选。除此之外,它还提供超长的电池续航时间、亮度高达 185 Hz 的 AMOLED 显示屏、久经考验的 AirTrigger、无线充电和所有型号的 IP 认证。摄像头经过了全新设计,但使用了相对较小的传感器,这在弱光环境下非常明显。此外,华硕只打算发布两次重大更新,这在同价位产品中是相当少的。

Pros

+ 明亮准确的 185 Hz 显示屏
+ 性能高且稳定
+ 通过 IP68 认证
+ 快速无线充电
+ 额外的 AirTrigger 按钮
+ 出色的音频接口

Cons

- 最低显示亮度增加
- 摄像头缺乏细节
- 只有两个主要更新
- 不支持 eSIM

价格和供应情况

目前,华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 可直接从华硕eStore 购买。.

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
89.8%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
24 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
Amazon:
1. $10.99
MOOISVS [2 Pack] for Asus RO...
2. $11.99
NOUKAJU Screen Protector for...
3. $5.35
Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit...
List Price: 1499€
227 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"
2400x1080
388 PPI
AMOLED
2.
86.8% v7 (old)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $9.59
Ibywind 2 Pack Screen Protec...
2. $7.59
Natbok 2 Pack Tempered Glass...
3. $9.59
Guizzcg 2 Pack Screen Protec...
List Price: 799€
229 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"
2480x1116
400 PPI
AMOLED
3.
88.6% v7 (old)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
24 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
Amazon:
1. $9.59
Ibywind 2 Pack Screen Protec...
2. $9.90
Anbzsign [2+2 Pack for ASUS ...
3. $5.35
Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit...
List Price: 1499€
225 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"
2400x1080
388 PPI
OLED
4.
91.1% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
List Price: 1449€
232 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"
3120x1440
505 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
5.
88.6%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro ⎘
Apple A18 Pro GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe
Amazon:
1. $37.00
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Clea...
2. $1,439.96
iPhone 16 Pro Max / 256GB / ...
3. $6.78
Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto...
List Price: 1449€
227 g256 GB NVMe6.90"
2868x1320
458 PPI
Super Retina XDR OLED
6.
87.3%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. 
AKABEILA [1 Pack Privacy Scr...
2. $4.11
AKABEILA 1 Pack Screen Prote...
3. $15.99
AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr...
List Price: 1199€
215 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"
2780x1264
450 PPI
AMOLED

ROG Phone 9 Pro 是继 ROG Phone 8 Pro从外观上看,ROG Phone 9 Pro 并无太大变化。华硕游戏手机系列有三种型号,其中最便宜的型号(不含 Pro 附加功能)不仅在内存和附加功能方面不得不做出妥协,在摄像头设置方面也是如此。廉价版 ROG Phone 9 的光学变焦被微距镜头取代。此外,背面的 LED 显示屏也变小了(85 点)。

,ROG Phone 9 Pro 目前的起售价为 1199 美元。它的内存容量为 16/512 GB。配备 Edition 附加组件的机型内存容量为 24/1,024 GB,还包括全新的 AeroActive Cooler X Pro。我们的评测设备是华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro Edition(建议零售价:1499 美元)。

规格

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (ROG Phone 9 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2
Graphics adapter
Memory
24 GB 
, LPDDR5x with 9600 MBit/s
Display
6.78 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 388 PPI, Capactive Touchscreen, up to 720 Hz Touch Sampling Rate, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 185 Hz
Storage
1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash, 1024 GB 
, 1000 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 3.5 mm Audio Jack (SNR: 100.53 dBFS, THD: 0.0018 %, THD+N: 0.0096 %), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer E-compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, AirTrigger, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (800, 850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 163.8 x 77
Battery
5800 mAh Lithium-Ion, QC 5.0, USB-PD
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony Lytia 700, 1/1.56", f/1.9, 6-axis Hybrid Gimbal OIS) + 13 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2) + 32 MPix (3x opt. Zoom, 1/3", f/2.4, OIS); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (22 mm, 1.4 µm)
Additional features
Speakers: Multi-magnet dual stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, AeroActive Cooler X Pro, USB-C-Cabel, SIM-Tool, 65W-Charger, ROG UI, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LC3, Opus | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ | DRM Widevine L1 | IP68 | USB Copy Test: 298.03 MB/s (connected to Samsung 980 Pro in an Asus ROG Strix Arion Case (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | Body-SAR: - W/kg, Head-SAR: - W/kg | max. charging speed: 65W (wired) / 15W (Qi 1.3, wireless), fanless, waterproof
Weight
227 g, Power Supply: 128 g
Price
1499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - 大猩猩 Glas Victus 2 和 IP68 认证

华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 的特点是沿袭了前代产品的简约设计,只进行了最小程度的优化,有魅影黑和暴风白两种颜色(仅限非 Pro 机型)。华硕重新设计了机身背面的圆点显示屏,现在它包括 648 个迷你 LED 灯,关闭时不可见。

华硕智能手机的正面和背面均由康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 构成,边框由哑光铝合金制成。玻璃后部也基本采用了磨砂处理,因此指纹问题也就不攻自破了。

做工令人印象深刻,缝隙紧密均匀。ROG Phone 9 Pro 在扭动时也能保持静音。它还符合 IP68 防水和防尘标准。

(图片来源:丹尼尔-施密特)
(图片来源:丹尼尔-施密特)
(图片来源:丹尼尔-施密特)
(图片来源:丹尼尔-施密特)
(图片来源:丹尼尔-施密特)
(图片来源:丹尼尔-施密特)
(图片来源:丹尼尔-施密特)

尺寸比较

163.98 mm 76.35 mm 8.9 mm 229 g163.8 mm 77 mm 8.9 mm 227 g163.8 mm 76.8 mm 8.9 mm 225 g163 mm 77.6 mm 8.25 mm 227 g162.3 mm 79 mm 8.6 mm 232 g162.3 mm 76.7 mm 8.2 mm 215 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - ROG Phone 9 有两个 USB 端口和 AirTrigger。

ROG Phone 9 Pro 有两个 USB 端口。长边的一个是 USB 3.2(Gen.1),它还可以通过线缆将内容传输到外部屏幕,在拷贝测试中达到了近 300 MB/s。第二个 USB 采用 2.0 标准。这两个接口都具有 OTG 和快速充电功能。

虽然不能使用 microSD 卡进行内存扩展,但 ROG Phone 仍有一个音频插孔连接(3.5 毫米)。AirTrigger 超声波传感器表面也再次搭载,可用作游戏中的附加输入元素。

上图:麦克风(图片来源:Daniel Schmidt)
首页: 麦克风
左:USB(图片来源:Daniel Schmidt)
左: USB
右图AirTrigger、音量、电源、麦克风、AirTrigger(图片来源:Daniel Schmidt)
右侧空气触发器、音量、电源、麦克风、空气触发器
底部:音频、扬声器、SIM 卡、USB、麦克风(图片来源:Daniel Schmidt)
底部:音频、扬声器、SIM 卡、USB、麦克风

软件 -Android 15 和五年更新

ROG Phone 9 Pro 预装了谷歌Android 15,在此基础上,华硕可选择应用其 ROG UI。另外,也可以选择纯Android 。安全补丁的更新支持时间超过五年,但华硕仍然只提供两个版本的升级,即升级到Android 17。

华硕现在首次在其智能手机中实现了人工智能功能。除 Circle to Search 外,还包括通话过程中的实时翻译、转录功能、AI 壁纸和图库中的语义图像搜索。没有预装第三方应用程序。

Amory Crate 应用程序可用于调整后置微型 LED 点阵显示屏、进行基于应用程序的性能设置或配置 AeroActive Cooler 等。

可持续性

华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 版的包装相当华丽,不仅完全由纸板制成,而且还用塑料薄膜包裹。

华硕目前不提供免费的维修说明或备件。因此,智能手机必须送修。此外,还缺少有关二氧化碳排放量的信息。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 精确定位、Wi-Fi 7 和 5G

所有现行标准都可用于移动数据传输,包括频率覆盖面广的 5G-Sub6。这意味着在全球任何国家访问移动网络都不会有任何问题。使用无线网络时,

Wi-Fi 7 的三个频段均可使用。结合我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000,ROG Phone 9 Pro 实现了稳定的传输速度,但在 5 GHz 网络中接收数据时速度出奇地慢。

Networking
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
993 (min: 953) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
565 (min: 427) MBit/s ∼34%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1864 (min: 929) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1549 (min: 1517) MBit/s ∼96%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1801 (min: 1553) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1660 (min: 1500) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1716 (min: 829) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1613 (min: 654) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
941 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
815 (min: 767) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1734 (min: 1577) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1505 (min: 659) MBit/s ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
556 (min: 253) MBit/s ∼31%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
801 (min: 397) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1553 (min: 815) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1461 (min: 1284) MBit/s ∼91%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
887 (min: 567) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
762 (min: 726) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1418 (min: 1324) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1258 (min: 1190) MBit/s ∼78%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
563 (min: 494) MBit/s ∼30%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1610 (min: 1480) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Wi-Fi 7
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1011 (min: 556) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
989 (min: 565) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1556 (min: 563) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1554 (min: 892) MBit/s ∼96%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
736 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
719 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1385 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼86%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1833 (929-1912)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1526 (815-1800)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1548 (1517-1569)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1461 (1284-1543)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø993 (953-1015)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø548 (253-611)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø564 (427-612)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø786 (397-819)
GPS 测试:户外
户外活动
GPS 测试:室内
室内

在室外,卫星修复工作非常迅速,华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 能够确认高信号强度。在室内则需要更长的时间,而且正如预期的那样,信号较弱。不过,位置确定仍然可以进行。

在一次自行车旅行中,我们将这款游戏智能手机与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表进行了比较。总的来说,华硕手机的路线跟踪效果很好,只是在细节上有一些小偏差。在日常情况下,您应该期待它完美无瑕的性能。

全球导航卫星系统测试路线:环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测试路线:环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测试路线:转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试路线:转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试路线:摘要
全球导航卫星系统测试路线:摘要

电话功能和语音质量

华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 可以容纳两张 nano-SIM 卡,但在欧洲不支持 eSIM。支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话等功能。集成人工智能的通话翻译功能仍处于测试阶段,但已经运行良好,与 Galaxy S24 Ultra.简单的对话翻译得通俗易懂,但当涉及到更复杂的问题时,人工智能很快就会达到极限。这款智能手机还可以录制对话。

语音质量很好,大多数背景噪音都能被有效抑制。只有在噪音较大的情况下,才会有声音传出,这导致用户更难理解。在扬声器模式下,ROG Phone 9 Pro 的麦克风范围相当大,表现也不错。

摄像头 - ROG Phone 9 Pro 依靠索尼 Lytia 700

与 ROG Phone 9 Pro 自拍(纵向模式)
与 ROG Phone 9 Pro 自拍(纵向模式)

华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 的前置摄像头采用了像素二进制技术,即把标称 3200 万像素的照片合成约 800 万像素,以实现更高的感光度。即使没有自动对焦,其效果也令人印象深刻,整体构图均匀。

三摄像头的核心是一个相对较小的索尼 Lytia 700 传感器,通过云台 OIS 进行稳定。特写镜头有明显的红色调,图像边缘略显模糊。暗处的细节会丢失,但照片仍然很吸引人。华硕成功地从传感器中获得了很多信息,但技术限制也很明显。

超广角镜头与该设置相辅相成,其成像性能向边缘下降,畸变也变得明显。不过,景深效果还不错。第三支镜头是三倍光学变焦(最大 30 倍数码变焦),但由于其传感器非常小,因此大量的百万像素也无济于事。日光下光学成像性能不错,但放大五倍后质量明显下降。

,ROG Phone 9 Pro 可录制最高 8k(30fps)的视频;如果需要 60fps,就只能用超高清或更低的帧率了。云台防抖功能在测试中令人印象深刻,但仅限于全高清。

主镜头(23.8 毫米)
主镜头(23.8 毫米)
3 倍变焦
3 倍变焦
10 倍变焦
10 倍变焦
30 倍变焦
30 倍变焦

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide-angle5x zoomLow light

华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 的色彩还原在可控光照条件下非常自然,没有出现大的偏差。

测试图的锐度稍有欠缺,即使是在图像的中间部分。

ColorChecker
3.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro: 4.68 ∆E min: 0.98 - max: 8.65 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
52.8 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.8 ∆E
60.3 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
29 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
62.9 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
74.2 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
84 ∆E
69.8 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro: 45.8 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 83.96 ∆E

配件和保修 - 装得满满当当的大箱子

华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 版的包装盒内含一个 65 瓦模块化充电器、一条 USB-C 编织线、一个 SIM 卡工具、一个 AeroActive Cooler X Pro 散热器和一个便携包以及两个保护套。

另外,华硕还宣传了自家的Tessen 控制器(零售价:89 美元),它拥有时尚的 Aura RGB 灯光,据称可以实现无延迟输入。

在德国的保修期为 24 个月,不能延长。

配备可拆卸式 AeroActive Cooler X Pro 的 ROG Phone 9 Pro
AeroActive Cooler X Pro
随附 65 瓦充电器
随附 65 瓦充电器

输入设备和操作 - 光学指纹传感器和附加按钮选项

华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 的电容式触摸屏的采样率高达 720 Hz,这意味着输入总是能快速实现。光学指纹传感器也集成在显示屏中,识别率很高,能快速解锁智能手机。此外,还可通过前置摄像头进行安全性较低的面部识别,在光线充足的条件下也能快速识别。

设备长边的 AirTriggers 是超声波传感器,可在游戏和系统本身中配置为附加输入元素。它们的工作既快速又可靠。如果你需要更多的按键,你可以通过 AeroActive Cooler X Pro 获得,它还提供时尚的 RGB 灯光效果,并与热电冷却系统配合使用。在满载情况下,噪音会相当大,可能会突破 60 分贝(A)的限制。

 

显示屏 - 高达 185 Hz 的明亮 AMOLED 显示屏

子像素结构
子像素结构

ROG Phone 9 Pro 的 6.8 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏具有全高清+分辨率,因此能够提供良好的图像清晰度。LTPO 功能可自动将刷新率调整为 1 至 120 Hz,也可手动固定为 165 Hz。185 Hz 刷新率只能通过 Game Genie 直接用于兼容游戏。

在激活环境光传感器和纯白显示屏的情况下,面板亮度已经很高,达到 1,682 cd/m²。如果使用较小的白色区域(APL18),亮度会更高,达到 2,455 cd/m²。在播放 HDR 视频时,我们甚至能达到 2,579 cd/m²。任何希望手动调节亮度的用户都可以获得最高 802 cd/m² 的亮度。不过,最低亮度也达到了 6 cd/m²,在黑暗中也会非常明亮。

我们测得的 PWM 调光频率相对较高,为 670 Hz,但这还不足以让眼睛感到舒适。设置中的闪烁保护功能使振幅曲线更加平缓(见信息框中的第二张截图),但也能看到轻微的偏红色调。

1696
cd/m²
1660
cd/m²
1665
cd/m²
1712
cd/m²
1682
cd/m²
1668
cd/m²
1716
cd/m²
1689
cd/m²
1678
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1716 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1685.1 cd/m² Minimum: 6.25 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1682 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.8"
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.8"
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.8"
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9"
Oppo Find X8 Pro
AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"
Screen
-9%
-43%
-76%
-46%
0%
Brightness middle
1682
1035
-38%
1699
1%
1317
-22%
1055
-37%
1167
-31%
Brightness
1685
1031
-39%
1698
1%
1365
-19%
1061
-37%
1160
-31%
Brightness Distribution
97
96
-1%
98
1%
94
-3%
93
-4%
98
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
1
9%
1.9
-73%
3.4
-209%
1.5
-36%
0.87
21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.1
1.9
10%
4.7
-124%
5
-138%
4.7
-124%
1.64
22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
1.6
6%
2.8
-65%
2.8
-65%
2.3
-35%
1.4
18%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.25 98%
2.26 97%
2 110%
2.21 100%
2.311 95%
CCT
6581 99%
6368 102%
6648 98%
6458 101%
6625 98%
6426 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 670 Hz
Amplitude: 16.13 %

The display backlight flickers at 670 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 670 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

使用固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看)。

如果在设置中选择 "StandardSplendid profile"(标准辉煌配置文件),你将看到由较小的 sRGB 色彩空间控制的自然色彩表现。在出厂设置中,ROG Phone 9 Pro 使用 DCI-P3 作为色彩空间,显示效果略微偏冷。

灰度(Splendid 配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(Splendid 配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩(Splendid 配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩(Splendid 配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(Splendid 配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(Splendid 配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(Splendid 配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(Splendid 配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.7735 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.441 ms rise
↘ 0.3325 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6165 ms rise
↘ 1.005 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在室外和大多数情况下,ROG Phone 9 Pro 仍然非常易于阅读。不过,在大多数光线条件下,亮度应该足够。

ROG Phone 9 Pro 户外(图片来源:Daniel Schmidt)
ROG Phone 9 Pro 户外(图片来源:Daniel Schmidt)

华硕游戏智能手机的视角稳定性特别好。在广视角下,亮度仅有轻微下降,并能看到轻微的绿雾。但这两种情况在日常生活中都不成问题。

ROG Phone 9 Pro 的视角稳定性
ROG Phone 9 Pro 的视角稳定性

性能 - ROG Phone 9 尽享 Snapdragon 8 Elite 的强大性能

华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 采用高通公司最快的 SoC,即 骁龙 8 精英版.该芯片最初只依赖于性能内核,两个最快内核的最高时钟频率为 4.32 GHz。我们的评测设备可使用 24 GB LPDDR5x 内存。

在 CPU 速度方面,Snapdragon 和 Dimensity 9400击败了最强劲的竞争对手。此外,华硕智能手机的高级系统速度也给人留下了深刻印象,但令人惊讶的是,在人工智能基准测试方面却没有达到预期。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
3479 Points +8%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
3215 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (3144 - 3228, n=3)
3196 Points -1%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2605 Points -19%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
2318 Points -28%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
2258 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2287 Points -29%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2270 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=165, last 2 years)
1478 Points -54%
Multi-Core
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
10323 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (9620 - 10401, n=3)
10115 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
8568 Points -17%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
7480 Points -28%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
7357 Points -29%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
7193 Points -30%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
7151 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
7102 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=165, last 2 years)
4126 Points -60%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
2258 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2253 - 2258, n=2)
2256 Points 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1838 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1716 Points -24%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
1672 Points -26%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1575 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)
1021 Points -55%
Multi-Core
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
8816 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8027 - 8816, n=2)
8422 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6426 Points -27%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
6415 Points -27%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
5870 Points -33%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
5393 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)
3404 Points -61%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2956859 - 3015111, n=2)
2985985 Points +1%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
2956859 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2374537 Points -20%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
2162423 Points -27%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2157865 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1837994 Points -38%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
1739816 Points -41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=101, last 2 years)
1259783 Points -57%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
26863 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (24088 - 26863, n=2)
25476 Points -5%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
21385 Points -20%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
20943 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18672 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 26863, n=191, last 2 years)
13055 Points -51%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
12314 Points -54%
CrossMark - Overall
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
2044 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  ()
2044 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
1517 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1443 Points -29%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1145 Points -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2044, n=160, last 2 years)
894 Points -56%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
Points -100%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
Points -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
10897 Points +2%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
10697 Points 0%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
10677 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  ()
10677 Points 0%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
10235 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9696 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)
6363 Points -40%
System
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
16475 Points +5%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
15935 Points +1%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
15745 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  ()
15745 Points 0%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
13729 Points -13%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
12891 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)
10203 Points -35%
Memory
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
12408 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  ()
12408 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
11460 Points -8%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
11263 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
10389 Points -16%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
9432 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)
6843 Points -45%
Graphics
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
56004 Points +45%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
38586 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  ()
38586 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
36002 Points -7%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
34464 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
27905 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)
17343 Points -55%
Web
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2145 Points +24%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
2059 Points +19%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1923 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1815 Points +5%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
1724 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  ()
1724 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)
1569 Points -9%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
75143 Points +293%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
19134 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  ()
19134 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18852 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
18048 Points -6%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
17748 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 75143, n=146, last 2 years)
17392 Points -9%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1971 - 307528, n=2)
154750 Points +7751%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
51509 Points +2513%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
33044 Points +1577%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=138, last 2 years)
25706 Points +1204%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
1971 Points
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1693 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1518 Points -23%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
1456 Points -26%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1368 Points +81%
Average of class Smartphone
  (191 - 4619, n=35, last 2 years)
845 Points +12%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
754 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  ()
754 Points 0%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
9283 Points +1130%
Average of class Smartphone
  (192 - 32432, n=35, last 2 years)
4196 Points +456%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
755 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  ()
755 Points 0%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
12709 Points +620%
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=35, last 2 years)
5989 Points +239%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
1765 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  ()
1765 Points 0%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (66.3 - 3219, n=22, last 2 years)
1241 Points +332%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
287 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  ()
287 Points 0%
Score V6
Average of class Smartphone
  (213 - 7302, n=10, last 2 years)
1814 Points +136%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
770 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  ()
770 Points 0%

图形计算由集成在 SoC 中的 Adreno 830 处理。在 3DMark 中,与前代产品相比,性能提高了 Adreno 750的性能提升并不明显。相比之下,在 GFXBench 中,我们看到的是令人印象深刻的 27% 到 65% 的性能提升。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
5575 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5383 Points -3%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
5185 Points -7%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5150 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4804 Points -14%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
4739 Points -15%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6303 Points +12%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
5642 Points
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
5226 Points -7%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5143 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5040 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
4752 Points -16%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
21065 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20068 Points -5%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
19690 Points -7%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19566 Points -7%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
18368 Points -13%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9461 Points 0%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
9430 Points
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
8655 Points -8%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8648 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
8146 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7510 Points -20%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9553 Points +1%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
9447 Points
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
8672 Points -8%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8668 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8620 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
8264 Points -13%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
2039 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1998 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
1715 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1629 Points -20%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
2069 Points +1%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2054 Points 0%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
2047 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1796 Points -12%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
166 fps
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
165 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -28%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps -63%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -64%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -64%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
765 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
744 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
549 fps -28%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
536 fps -30%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
498 fps -35%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
466 fps -39%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
166 fps
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
165 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -28%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps -61%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
62 fps -63%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -64%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
469 fps +3%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
457 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
339 fps -26%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
327 fps -28%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
324 fps -29%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
314 fps -31%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
166 fps
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
158 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps -30%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
62 fps -63%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -64%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -64%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
341 fps +2%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
335 fps
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
259 fps -23%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
248 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps -26%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
225 fps -33%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
154 fps
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps -46%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -61%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -61%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -61%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
216 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
172 fps -20%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
143 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
142 fps -34%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
135 fps -37%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
131 fps -39%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
144 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps -50%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps -58%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -58%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -58%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -58%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
112 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 fps -37%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps -39%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps -43%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
56 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps +49%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
166 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps -31%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps -63%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -64%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -64%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
263 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
187 fps -29%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
184 fps -30%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
183 fps -30%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
172 fps -35%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
162 fps -38%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40 fps -23%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38 fps -27%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
37 fps -29%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
30 fps -42%

使用华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 上网非常流畅,毫不费力。在基准测试中,它始终名列前三分之一,只有在与 iPhone.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
353.735 Points +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (241 - 280, n=2)
260 Points +8%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131)
240.864 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
215.998 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
209.919 Points -13%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120)
195.426 Points -19%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Chrome 120)
70.022 Points -71%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84)
162.37 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years)
121.7 Points -49%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
557 runs/min +46%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131)
382 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ()
382 runs/min 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
269 runs/min -30%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
265 runs/min -31%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120)
215 runs/min -44%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Chrome 120)
69.6 runs/min -82%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84)
166 runs/min -57%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)
139.5 runs/min -63%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
33.5 runs/min +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (25.9 - 34, n=2)
30 runs/min +16%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131)
25.9 runs/min
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
16.3 runs/min -37%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=61, last 2 years)
11.2 runs/min -57%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
271 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
195 Points 0%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131)
195 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ()
195 Points 0%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84)
171 Points -12%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120)
162 Points -17%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
147 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=155, last 2 years)
114.5 Points -41%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
100368 Points +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (72825 - 92494, n=2)
82660 Points +14%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131)
72825 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
72011 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120)
70135 Points -4%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Chrome 120)
25953 Points -64%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84)
63669 Points -13%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
60987 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
37721 Points -48%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)
1551 ms * -170%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84)
852.3 ms * -49%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Chrome 120)
679.5 ms * -18%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120)
653 ms * -14%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
625.4 ms * -9%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
599 ms * -4%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131)
573.9 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (422 - 574, n=2)
498 ms * +13%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
279.4 ms * +51%

* ... smaller is better

华硕在存储方面采用了快速的 UFS 4.0 标准,在所有方面都能达到很高的传输速度。

Asus ROG Phone 9 ProNubia RedMagic 9 ProAsus ROG Phone 8 ProSamsung Galaxy S24 UltraOppo Find X8 ProAverage 1 TB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-1%
-4%
-33%
-30%
-10%
-51%
Sequential Read 256KB
4026.96
4164.08
3%
4016.67
0%
3610.25
-10%
3482.9
-14%
3597 ?(3070 - 4027, n=9)
-11%
Sequential Write 256KB
3773.6
3199.98
-15%
3153.4
-16%
1893.63
-50%
3498.5
-7%
3399 ?(2863 - 3908, n=9)
-10%
Random Read 4KB
441.13
442.82
0%
434.63
-1%
437.12
-1%
375.7
-15%
402 ?(349 - 441, n=9)
-9%
Random Write 4KB
637.2
691.17
8%
648
2%
181.55
-72%
100.4
-84%
579 ?(431 - 753, n=9)
-9%

游戏 - 无限游戏,储备丰富

华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 性能出众,并通过触摸屏的高采样率、立体声扬声器和 AirTriggers 加以补充。可拆卸散热器的设计可使性能保持更长时间的稳定,同时还提供了额外的按键。

我们使用GameBench 对游戏性能进行了分析。.即使在要求较高的游戏《源氏冲击》中,它在最高级别的细节设置下也能达到稳定的 60fps。华硕智能手机在《PUBG Mobile》中的表现也绝对稳定,在最低细节设置下也能显示 120fps。

不过,185 Hz 仅适用于少数游戏(见截图),不过也有一些突出的游戏。在Armoury Crate应用程序中,华硕列出了支持高帧率游戏的每款游戏。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
游戏频率为 185 赫兹
源泉冲击
源泉冲击
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø59.9 (57-60)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø59.9 (56-60)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø119.1 (105-121)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (50-61)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø40 (37-41)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro; Diablo Immortal: Ø59.8 (51-60)

排放 - Snapdragon 声音和稳定的性能

温度

在持续负载的情况下,华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 的最高温度可达 49 °C。虽然温度很高,但无需担心。

在这种情况下,由于华硕智能手机的骁龙处理器几乎不会出现节流现象,因此它甚至表现出了良好的散热性能。3DMark 压力测试证明了这一点,令人印象深刻。使用夹式散热器的用户甚至可以持续发挥其性能。

Max. Load
 47.3 °C49 °C47 °C 
 45.7 °C38.2 °C45.7 °C 
 39.1 °C47.1 °C44.7 °C 
Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 44.9 °C
44.6 °C46.9 °C46.6 °C
43.1 °C46.6 °C45.5 °C
39.3 °C45.6 °C41.3 °C
Maximum: 46.9 °C
Average: 44.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Stress Tests

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
94.6 % +5%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash (0.0.0.0)
92.7 % +2%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash (0.0.0.0)
77 % -15%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (0.0.0.0)
92.3 % +2%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91.4 % +1%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
90.5 %
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.1 % -49%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (1.1.4.1)
94.3 % +4%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash (1.1.4.1)
90.8 % 0%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash (1.1.4.1)
79.2 % -13%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash (1.1.4.1)
90.6 %
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
65.5 % -28%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (1.1.4.1)
58 % -36%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (1.1.4.1)
56.4 % -38%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (1.0.6.5)
99.5 % +11%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash (1.0.11.1)
89.5 %
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash (1.0.6.5)
83.3 % -7%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
72.6 % -19%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (1.0.11.1)
55.5 % -38%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (1.0.6.5)
53.9 % -40%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash (1.1.1.3, with Fan)
99.2 %
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash (1.1.1.3)
89.8 % -9%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (1.0.0.15)
76.6 % -23%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
73.4 % -26%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (1.1.1.3)
61 % -39%
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø32.2 (30.7-33.8)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø20.8 (19.3-29.5)
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø28.1 (22.2-38.3)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø118.2 (112.9-124.7)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø58.5 (56.7-59.9)
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø67 (63.3-68.6)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø124.9 (124.6-126.2)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø76.8 (70.5-109.8)
05101520253035Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø31.5 (31.4-31.5)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø21.2 (20.6-28.9)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø30.1 (27.8-31.1)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø20.8 (20.2-27.7)
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø28.3 (21.7-39.1)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3, with Fan: Ø15.2 (15.2-15.3)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø15 (13.7-15.3)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø10.9 (10.6-14.4)
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.3 (11.1-18.3)

发言人

ROG Phone 9 Pro 的两个扬声器由 Dirac 调校,虽然声音强劲有力,但在最大音量时,中音可以更突出一些。不过,在较小的音量下,它们听起来要和谐得多。

通过 USB 或音频插孔连接,可以输出高保真音频,后者在测试中几乎没有失真。华硕手机还充分利用了其无线功能,提供广泛的编解码器支持,包括 aptX Lossless。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.429.62533.833.23117.833.34021.232.55030.427.76324.332.28015.33910016.844.712514.153.916013.457.120013.15625013.556.831513.463.740011.760.250011.366.463010.371.780010.475.4100012.779.8125011.678.4160012.779200013.881.1250014.379.7315013.780400012.676.6500013.479.1630013.378.5800013.376.21000013.569.21250013.662.3160001450.2SPL25.190.1N0.683.5median 13.4median 75.4Delta0.79.736.246.130.739.625.643.926.742.836.743.624.644.317.64618.743.218.245.715.956.617.356.115.260.214.160.413.461.313.866.514.367.713.774.912.478.112.778.612.177.212.981.612.584.612.284.112.88413.18413.578.513.176.913.7741466.813.36425.2930.792.2median 13.5median 74.91.210.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Phone 9 ProSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 华硕 ROG Phone 9 和 5,800 毫安时

耗电量

功耗需要改进,尤其是在显示屏亮度最低的情况下空闲运行时,不过这也是由于最低亮度相对较高的缘故。在满负荷运行时,华硕没有对其游戏智能手机进行任何限制,因此功耗也相当高。

ROG Phone 9 Pro 的 5,800 毫安时电池可通过电缆以高达 65 瓦的功率充电。在测试中,充满电需要整整 50 分钟,17 分钟就能充满 50%,31 分钟就能充满 80%。无线充电也是可行的。不过,最大功率为 15 瓦,充电速度要慢得多。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.14 / 0.38 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.99 / 1.08 / 1.14 Watt
Load midlight 12.97 / 19.21 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
5800 mAh
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
5500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
4685 mAh
Oppo Find X8 Pro
5910 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
26%
-4%
17%
35%
-2%
7%
Idle Minimum *
0.99
0.82
17%
0.73
26%
0.42
58%
0.6
39%
0.788 ?(0.5 - 0.99, n=4)
20%
Idle Average *
1.08
0.96
11%
1.22
-13%
1.55
-44%
0.8
26%
1.498 ?(1.08 - 2.06, n=4)
-39%
Idle Maximum *
1.14
1.19
-4%
1.34
-18%
1.58
-39%
0.9
21%
1.555 ?(1.13 - 2.1, n=4)
-36%
Load Average *
12.97
7.3
44%
16.52
-27%
3.41
74%
6.8
48%
10.1 ?(8.01 - 13, n=4)
22%
Load Maximum *
19.21
7.3
62%
16.58
14%
11.82
38%
10.9
43%
14.8 ?(9.3 - 19.2, n=4)
23%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516171819Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.15 (1.439-19.1)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.63 (0.966-16.1)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.942 (0.853-1.818)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.98 (0.924-1.218)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314151617Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø15 (12.6-17.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.1 (9.83-15.6)
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.942 (0.853-1.818)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.98 (0.924-1.218)

电池运行时间

与上一代产品相比,ROG Phone 9 Pro 的功耗在各方面都有所改进,但如果能提高效率,续航时间肯定会更长。

最好的对比方法是使用适应的显示屏亮度(150 cd/m2)进行测试,在这方面,华硕智能手机仅次于 OPPO Find X8 Pro.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
50h 40min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 130)
21h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
27h 28min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 40min
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
5800 mAh
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
6500 mAh
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
5500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
4685 mAh
Oppo Find X8 Pro
5910 mAh
Battery Runtime
-18%
-17%
2%
46%
37%
Reader / Idle
3040
2377
-22%
2227
-27%
4226
39%
3665
21%
H.264
1648
1497
-9%
1922
17%
1990
21%
1976
20%
WiFi v1.3
1262
1036
-18%
929
-26%
1148
-9%
1249
-1%
1411
12%
Load
160
140
-12%
202
26%
357
123%
309
93%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

在性能方面,ROG Phone 9 Pro 会有一些优势,但在摄像头方面稍弱,而且更新支持时间可能更长。

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro - 11/26/2024 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
70 / 69 → 100%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
92%
Games Performance
54 / 55 → 99%
Application Performance
88 / 85 → 100%
AI Performance
39%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 87%
Camera
74%
Average
68%
90%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
93.8%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
55.7%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 44.1%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 评测--这款智能手机是每个游戏玩家的首选
Daniel Schmidt, 2024-11-30 (Update: 2024-11-30)