Radeon RX 6650M性能首次亮相。惠普Omen 16 2022笔记本电脑评测
虽然惠普Omen 16系列还不到一年,但最新的2022款已经从原来的内部和外部都有了很大的更新。最新版本增加了英特尔第12代Alder Lake-H和AMD Zen 3+ CPU选项,GeForce RTX 3070 Ti和Radeon RX 6000M GPU选项,以及一些外观变化。
我们审查的配置是全AMD SKU,配备Ryzen 7 6800H,105 W TGP Radeon RX 6650M,以及144 Hz 1080p IPS显示屏,零售价约为1600美元。这也恰好是极少数配备Radeon RX 6650M图形的笔记本电脑之一。
Omen 16与其他中高档16英寸游戏笔记本电脑直接竞争,如戴尔G16 7620 ,联想Legion S7 16 ,或华硕Zephyrus M16 。如果想找一个更经济的选择,用户可以考虑低端的HP Victus 16 。
更多的惠普评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.4 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | HP Omen 16-n0033dx R7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M | 2.4 kg | 22.6 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | HP Envy 16 h0112nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 19.8 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
85.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 23 mm | 16.10" | 2560x1440 | |
82.3 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | HP Victus 16-e0145ng R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
89.3 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S | 2.2 kg | 16.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.1 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | Dell G16 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 26.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 灵感来自 Envy 16
2022年的Omen 16从正面看几乎与2021年的型号一模一样,但背面和底部周围的细节已经改变。例如,端口不再是以前的位置,而现在的后角比以前更圆。通风和扬声器格栅也被重新设计,特别是底板有一个更大的通风口。
金属底盘材料在其他方面与去年的机型相同,给人以类似的感觉和印象。底座仍然很硬,几乎像Envy 16,但盖子在调整角度时往往会摇晃。小铰链在打开到最大角度时也容易断裂。戴尔G16的铰链 戴尔G16相比之下感觉更强。
尽管有所有的外部更新,尺寸和重量与去年的机型几乎没有变化。该机型舒适地位于更薄、更轻的联想Legion S7 16和更厚、更重的戴尔G16之间。华硕 华硕Zephyrus M16如果用户想要一个更便携的16英寸游戏笔记本电脑,那么华硕Zephyrus M16就明显轻了半公斤。
连接性 - 不支持Thunderbolt
与2021年的机型相比,今年的机型已经换掉了迷你显示端口,转而使用第二个USB-C端口。除此之外,两款机型之间的端口选项基本相同。
最明显的同比变化涉及端口的位置。去年的模型上的端口沿左边缘过于拥挤,因此一些端口已被重新分配到后边缘。虽然不是特别理想,但这仍然比完全减少端口要好。
SD卡阅读器
与去年的型号相比,SD读卡器的传输速率保持不变。许多竞争性游戏笔记本,如戴尔G16,完全省略了读卡器。同时,Razer Blade 15上的SD读卡器 雷蛇刀片15 提供了2倍的性能。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
沟通
联发科MT7922是Wi-Fi 6E和蓝牙5.2连接的标准配置。大多数其他游戏笔记本都使用英特尔AX201/210系列,但联发科的解决方案可能是更实惠的选择。当连接到我们的6GHz网络时,传输率非常好,没有任何性能问题。
Networking | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr |
网络摄像头
网络摄像头令人失望,只有720p或1MP,而其他游戏笔记本,如Razer Blade 15有1080p或2MP网络摄像头。此外,该模型缺乏网络摄像头快门和红外传感器。
维护
底部面板由八个飞利浦螺钉固定,便于维修。用户可以直接访问2个M.2存储托架、2个DDR5 SODIMM插槽、可拆卸的WLAN模块和主电池。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件外,盒子里没有其他额外的东西。通常的一年有限保修期适用。
输入设备 - 舒适的键盘,不舒适的点击板
键盘
打字体验与去年的Omen 16相同,因为键盘没有变化。键程较浅,类似于超极本,但坚实的反馈和超大的空格键弥补了这一点。我们希望在未来的版本中看到电源键移到其他地方,因为它目前的位置在退格键和德尔键旁边,很容易被误按。
键盘的背光被分成四个不同的区域,而不是每个键的RGB,考虑到Omen 16的高价位和性能水平,这一点令人失望。
触摸板
点击板比戴尔G16上的大得多(13 x 8.6厘米,10.5 x 6厘米),便于多点触摸输入。牵引力很平稳,与外盖或周围的掌托一样,粘性很小。
不幸的是,这里的点击板的一个主要缺点是对压力过于敏感。例如,当用手指滚动时,太容易意外地输入一个点击,这使得整个笔记本电脑在没有外部鼠标的情况下使用起来非常恼人。相比之下,其他游戏笔记本上的点击板就不那么敏感了。
显示器 - FreeSync与144赫兹和100% sRGB
有以下三种显示方式可供选择。
- 1080p, 144 Hz, 250 nits
- 1080p,144赫兹,300尼特
- 1440p,165赫兹,300尼特
我们在这里的显示测量只反映了上面加粗的选项。最高端的165赫兹选项在英特尔和AMD Omen 16 SKU上都有。
尽管如此,我们的AMD设备上的IPS面板仍然非常好,它具有完整的sRGB覆盖率,体面的对比度,以及体面的黑白响应时间。根据我们自己的X-Rite色度计,甚至显示器的最大亮度也比惠普宣传的要高20%。总体图像质量明显好于价格较低的惠普Victus 16,后者使用的是更便宜的智美面板,色彩更差,鬼影更明显。
|
Brightness Distribution: 79 %
Center on Battery: 373.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 848:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.12 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.06
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
73.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
74.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
HP Omen 16-n0033dx BOE0AAE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | HP Envy 16 h0112nr Samsung SDC4174, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | HP Omen 16-b1090ng BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1" | HP Victus 16-e0145ng CMN1609, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell G16 7620 BOE NE16QDM, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 18% | -2% | -41% | -3% | -4% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 74.4 | 99.3 33% | 71 -5% | 41.6 -44% | 69.8 -6% | 68.3 -8% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.2 | 100 1% | 97.9 -1% | 61.9 -38% | 98.1 -1% | 98 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 73.4 | 88 20% | 73.3 0% | 43 -41% | 71.9 -2% | 70.5 -4% |
Response Times | 86% | 17% | -71% | 15% | 29% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 17.6 ? | 2 ? 89% | 14.5 ? 18% | 29.6 ? -68% | 10 ? 43% | 8.6 ? 51% |
Response Time Black / White * | 11.2 ? | 1.9 ? 83% | 9.4 ? 16% | 19.4 ? -73% | 12.8 ? -14% | 10.4 ? 7% |
PWM Frequency | 240.4 ? | |||||
Screen | 12% | -28% | -87% | 28% | 13% | |
Brightness middle | 373.3 | 328.8 -12% | 335 -10% | 257 -31% | 492.4 32% | 369.4 -1% |
Brightness | 361 | 332 -8% | 319 -12% | 239 -34% | 471 30% | 348 -4% |
Brightness Distribution | 79 | 97 23% | 90 14% | 88 11% | 90 14% | 83 5% |
Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.28 36% | 0.25 43% | 0.4 9% | 0.32 27% | |
Contrast | 848 | 1196 41% | 1028 21% | 1231 45% | 1154 36% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.12 | 1.53 28% | 4.38 -107% | 6.91 -226% | 1.9 10% | 1.78 16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.62 | 6.04 -7% | 9.48 -69% | 22.27 -296% | 3.81 32% | 4.41 22% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.06 | 1.33 35% | 3.61 -75% | 0.99 52% | 1.22 41% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 1.3 48% | 7 -180% | 7.5 -200% | 1.7 32% | 3.2 -28% |
Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.18 101% | 2.103 105% | 2.125 104% | 2.36 93% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6408 101% | 6362 102% | 6244 104% | 6025 108% | 6497 100% | 6750 96% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 39% /
27% | -4% /
-16% | -66% /
-75% | 13% /
20% | 13% /
11% |
* ... smaller is better
这款显示器在开箱时就已经得到了很好的校准,平均灰度和色彩deltaE值分别只有2.5和2.12。试图用我们的X-Rite色度计进一步校准它,会稍微改善颜色,但还不足以使最终用户的校准成为必要。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise | |
↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise | |
↘ 7.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
室外能见度在阴暗处很好,而任何更亮的东西都会冲淡屏幕。联想Legion S7 16的显示屏可以达到近500尼特,而我们的惠普只有370尼特,如果户外能见度是一个问题,那么它是更好的选择。请确保禁用惠普的AMD Vari-Bright,否则在电池供电的情况下,最大亮度会自动下降。
业绩
测试条件
在运行以下任何性能基准之前,我们通过Windows将我们的设备设置为 "最佳性能 "模式,通过Omen Gaming Hub软件设置为 "性能 "模式。我们强烈建议熟悉Omen Gaming Hub和Radeon Adrenalin应用程序,因为它们都是调整电源配置文件、键盘照明、自适应同步、Vari-Bright等的控制中心,如下面的截图所示。
无论是BIOS屏幕还是Omen Gaming Hub软件,我们在笔记本上都找不到MUX开关。
处理器
原始的CPU性能比我们数据库中配备相同的笔记本电脑要慢5%左右。 Ryzen 7 6800H处理器。因此,我们的CPU只比去年的 Ryzen 7 5800H来说是一个边缘化的同比更新。移动Zen 3和Zen 3+之间的最大区别在于它们的集成图形解决方案,但这对于像Omen 16这样的游戏笔记本来说几乎是无关紧要的,因为它们几乎都配有更快的专用GPU。
单线程和多线程性能大约分别比竞争对手的 酷睿i7-12700H在戴尔G16 7620中。选择价格较高的 酷睿i9-12900HOmen 16配置将比我们的Ryzen SKU提高30%到35%的性能。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (4460 - 5661, n=9) | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (580 - 605, n=9) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (1585 - 2366, n=10) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (182.7 - 250, n=10) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (213 - 268, n=8) | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (55067 - 64817, n=8) | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (5521 - 5803, n=8) | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (8898 - 10355, n=10) | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (1518 - 1568, n=10) | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (14.9 - 18.5, n=9) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (48.7 - 79.5, n=8) | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (0.4783 - 0.515, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (12876 - 17031, n=8) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (82673 - 105987, n=8) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (2886 - 3634, n=8) | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (75117 - 106322, n=8) | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (11771 - 13120, n=8) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (45287 - 58327, n=8) | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (67816 - 137383, n=8) | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (732 - 901, n=8) | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (6917 - 8980, n=8) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (26496 - 30360, n=8) | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
系统性能
PCMark得分与运行在英特尔第12代CPU和NvidiaGeForce RTX GPU上的最新游戏笔记本电脑相当。结果一直领先于 胜利者16这是惠普的一个更经济实惠的游戏系列。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
CrossMark / Overall | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
PCMark 10 Score | 7205 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (48209 - 51186, n=8) | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (43828 - 51778, n=8) | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (51116 - 55307, n=8) | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (83.1 - 104.1, n=8) | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示了在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时的DPC问题。在60FPS下的4K视频播放是完美的,CPU/GPU利用率低,没有丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 多达两个PCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘
我们的测试设备配备了一个1TB 三星PM9A1固态硬盘,分别承诺7000MB/s和5100MB/s的连续读取和写入率。该系统能够无限期地保持约6700MB/s的实际读取速率,但正如我们下面的循环测试结果所示,该硬盘偶尔会下降到3000MB/s的低水平,然后再反弹回来。这可能是系统的一个错误,而不是一个性能节流措施。两个M.2 2280插槽都有自己的散热垫,将热量散发到金属底板上,因此SSD过热不应该是一个问题。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能--超越了GeForce RTX 3060
Radeon RX 6650M位于以下两者之间 移动GeForce RTX 3060和 移动GeForce RTX 3070当涉及到性能时。然而,不幸的是,它更接近RTX 3060,而不是RTX 3070,因此用户在玩大多数游戏时,应该只期望帧率仅比普通RTX 3060笔记本电脑高5%至10%。
虽然Radeon RX 6650M在光栅化性能方面略胜RTX 3060笔记本电脑,但在实时光线追踪性能方面,它明显慢了很多。3DMark Port Royal的结果比采用RTX 3060的戴尔G16低近30%。为了在实际游戏中测试这一点,我们将在我们的AMD驱动的惠普笔记本电脑上,在1080p设置下运行F1 22,有和没有RT。当禁用RT时,帧率将持续领先于任何RTX 3060笔记本电脑。当RT被禁用时,帧率将下降到比那些相同的RTX 3060笔记本电脑慢15%左右。如果RT性能对你很重要,那么你肯定要考虑用Nvidia SKU代替。
在平衡模式而不是性能模式下运行将使GPU性能降低约11%。
不幸的是,GPU并非没有一些问题。例如,Blender HIP渲染和Horizon Zero Dawn分别会使程序崩溃和有启动问题,尽管在审查时是在最新的图形驱动上。
更多技术细节和基准可以在我们的Radeon RX 6650M专用页面上找到 这里.
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6650M () | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6650M () | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng | |
2560x1440 Speed Way Score | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6650M () | |
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6650M () | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
3DMark 11 Performance | 26153 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 22516 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 8869 points | |
Help |
Blender - v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng |
在Witcher 3 ,空闲时的帧率通常是稳定的,只有短暂的下降到13FPS。这可能是由于一个错误或后台活动的优先级不高,类似于我们在上面观察到的SSD压力测试时的性能下降。
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 276.5 | 217.4 | 167 | 90.1 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 141 | 130.7 | 118 | 100 |
Overwatch (2016) | 507.9 | 481.9 | 350.9 | 150 |
Fortnite (2018) | 95.5 | 54.1 | 46 | 40.4 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 164.7 | 113.3 | 83.2 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 66.4 | 52.7 | 46.4 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 337 | 222 | 190 | 167.2 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 138.8 | 111.5 | 81 | 65.8 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 110.4 | 95.9 | 85.2 | 67.4 |
Gears Tactics (2020) | 162.8 | 205.9 | 124.2 | 100.4 |
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) | 109 | 104 | 94 | 62 |
Dirt 5 (2020) | 236.6 | 135.4 | 109.1 | 83.6 |
Hitman 3 (2021) | 224.8 | 178.8 | 165.5 | 156.3 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 315 | 247 | 216 | 100 |
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 111 | 105 | 96 | 88 |
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) | 117 | 110 | 111 | 105 |
God of War (2022) | 69.3 | 68.4 | 64.3 | 51.5 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 126.8 | 106.3 | 78.9 | 63.8 |
F1 22 (2022) | 217 | 215 | 178.2 | 40.6 |
排放
系统噪音 - 在性能模式下很响亮
内部风扇总是在27分贝(A)的低水平上活动,而沉默的背景是24分贝(A)。然而,它们善于在较长时间的压力下保持安静,因此,在浏览网页或视频流时,转速脉冲出现的频率要低得多。
在游戏时,风扇噪音与电源配置文件有关。运行在 Witcher 3例如,在平衡模式下运行,风扇噪音只有39.4分贝(A),而在性能模式下则为54.1分贝(A)。在类似条件下,50分贝(A)的范围明显比戴尔G16的噪音大。如果用户希望以最高的TGP目标运行GPU,就必须忍受大得多的风扇噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 27.4 / 27.4 / 28.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32.3 / 57.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.2 dB(A) |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Radeon RX 6650M, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP Envy 16 h0112nr GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | HP Victus 16-e0145ng GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | Dell G16 7620 GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 512GB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | -13% | -6% | 11% | 3% | |
off / environment * | 24.2 | 22.8 6% | 26 -7% | 26 -7% | 23.1 5% | 23.2 4% |
Idle Minimum * | 27.4 | 22.9 16% | 30 -9% | 26 5% | 23.1 16% | 28.3 -3% |
Idle Average * | 27.4 | 22.9 16% | 31 -13% | 28 -2% | 23.1 16% | 28.8 -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.9 | 30.5 -6% | 33 -14% | 34 -18% | 23.1 20% | 28.9 -0% |
Load Average * | 32.3 | 41.4 -28% | 49 -52% | 44 -36% | 31.4 3% | 32.4 -0% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 54.1 | 51.1 6% | 53 2% | 48 11% | 51.4 5% | 48.3 11% |
Load Maximum * | 57.6 | 51.4 11% | 57 1% | 53 8% | 51.2 11% | 48.1 16% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
与下面的甲板相比,键盘甲板上的表面温度要低得多。游戏时,顶部的热点达到约40摄氏度,而底部则超过50摄氏度。键盘 英特尔驱动的Omen 16在类似的条件下,温度甚至可以达到60摄氏度。这些热点在机箱的后部,手指和手掌不可能接触到的地方。
请记住,该模型的大部分底部和后部都是专门用于冷却的。如果你不小心,很容易意外地堵塞通风格栅。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.2 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.2 °C / 79.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.7 °C / 4.8 F).
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M | HP Envy 16 h0112nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | HP Victus 16-e0145ng AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6800S | Dell G16 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -9% | -2% | -22% | -2% | 2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.2 | 45.2 -10% | 41 -0% | 54 -31% | 46.6 -13% | 47.6 -16% |
Maximum Bottom * | 53.2 | 44 17% | 62 -17% | 47 12% | 50.8 5% | 54 -2% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.4 | 33.6 -27% | 25 5% | 41 -55% | 26.4 -0% | 23 13% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.8 | 32.6 -17% | 26 6% | 31 -12% | 27.2 2% | 24.6 12% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当在Prime95下施加压力时,CPU将提升到4.4GHz和93W,仅几秒钟,然后下降并稳定在3.7GHz和64W。在Omen 16上重复这个相同的测试联想Legion 5 Pro第7代 使用相同的Ryzen 7 6800H CPU,将导致更高的稳定时钟速率和温度,分别为4.1 GHz和93 C,而在我们的惠普上只有3.7 GHz和78 C。
当运行 Witcher 3下降到平衡模式将导致较低的GPU时钟2178 MHz和较低的TGP 72 W,但核心温度没有显著变化。因此,用户必须记住通过Omen Gaming Hub软件启用性能模式,以充分发挥GPU的作用。
用电池运行限制了性能。在电池上进行的Fire Strike 测试,物理学和图形学得分分别为21063和5722分,而在主电源上则为25021和25739分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | GPU平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 37 | 35 |
Prime95压力 | 3.7 | -- | 79 | 52 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 3.9 | ~1262 | 88 | 66 |
Witcher 3 压力(平衡模式) | ~1.1 | 2178 | 76 | 81 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能模式) | ~1.1 | 2516 | 85 | 80 |
发言人
HP Omen 16-n0033dx audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--高要求的游戏者
消耗功率
由于Radeon RX 6650M比RTX 3060略快,我们应该预期平均功耗也会略高。对AMD来说,不幸的是,现实是我们的Omen 16在游戏时可能比其他大多数RTX 2060笔记本电脑更耗电。运行 Witcher 3例如,需要206瓦,而搭载RTX 3060的戴尔G16则是177瓦、187瓦和155瓦。联想Legion 5 15和联想Legion Slim 7 16。这些相同的替代品甚至可以通过其第12代英特尔处理器提供更快的CPU性能。
值得庆幸的是,在不运行任何高要求的应用程序时,耗电量与许多英特尔-英伟达笔记本电脑相当。这意味着在网络浏览或流媒体时,电池寿命不会比大多数英特尔-英伟达的替代品大幅缩短,尽管在游戏时笔记本会很耗电。
当CPU和GPU处于100%的利用率时,我们能够从大型(约17.9 x 8.5 x 2.5厘米)280瓦交流适配器中记录到246瓦的临时最大功耗。
Off / Standby | 0.03 / 0.09 Watt |
Idle | 7.9 / 11.5 / 18.3 Watt |
Load |
88.1 / 246.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx R7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | HP Envy 16 h0112nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1" | HP Victus 16-e0145ng R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell G16 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 512GB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -9% | 8% | 18% | -3% | -35% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7.9 | 10 -27% | 4 49% | 7 11% | 8.8 -11% | 14.4 -82% |
Idle Average * | 11.5 | 10.9 5% | 10 13% | 9 22% | 14.7 -28% | 17.8 -55% |
Idle Maximum * | 18.3 | 27.8 -52% | 19 -4% | 15 18% | 19.8 -8% | 31.5 -72% |
Load Average * | 88.1 | 116.4 -32% | 114 -29% | 93 -6% | 85.3 3% | 101.2 -15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 206 | 133.7 35% | 183.2 11% | 134.5 35% | 167.5 19% | 176.9 14% |
Load Maximum * | 246.4 | 209.8 15% | 221 10% | 185 25% | 230.7 6% | 242.9 1% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
电池容量明显比老款Omen 16的英特尔版本小(68Wh对83Wh)。尽管如此,我们的AMD模型的总体运行时间并没有明显缩短。我们能够在平衡电源配置文件中记录到将近7小时的实际WLAN运行时间,这对于游戏笔记本电脑来说高于平均水平。
用附带的交流适配器从空电到满电的充电时间相对较慢,为2至2.5小时,而大多数笔记本电脑为1.5小时。此外,该笔记本电脑与大多数第三方USB-C交流充电器不兼容。惠普宣传说该机型支持USB-C电力传输,但连接我们自己的100W USB-C交流适配器会出现 "交流适配器与系统不兼容 "的警告信息。相比之下,雷蛇、微星或华硕的支持PD的游戏笔记本可以与我们测试的所有USB-C交流适配器一起使用。
HP Omen 16-n0033dx R7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M, 68 Wh | HP Envy 16 h0112nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | HP Victus 16-e0145ng R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S, 71 Wh | Dell G16 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 43% | 16% | 1% | -11% | -32% | |
Reader / Idle | 599 | 1068 78% | 603 1% | 426 -29% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 418 | 472 13% | 336 -20% | 424 1% | 374 -11% | 297 -29% |
Load | 68 | 94 38% | 114 68% | 43 -37% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 有能力替代GeForce RTX 3060。
与大多数基于AMD的笔记本电脑一样,AMD Omen 16的售价比同等的英特尔酷睿i7和GeForce RTX笔记本电脑低几百美元。Ryzen 7 6800H在原始性能上无法与最新的12代酷睿CPU竞争,但Radeon RX 6650M在与RTX 3060的竞争中保持得比预期的好。由于大多数游戏都是GPU绑定的,在这种情况下,英特尔和AMD之间的CPU赤字在运行实际游戏时要少得多。业主将以明显较少的钱获得比RTX 3060稍好的游戏性能,这是AMD Omen 16的主要吸引力。
其他积极因素包括舒适的键盘、广泛的端口选择、质量良好的144赫兹显示屏以及类似Envy 16的平滑机箱。一些用户可能会欣赏没有LED或肤浅的玩家设计,这与大多数微星或华硕的替代品不同。
与大多数采用GeForce RTX 3060的笔记本电脑相比,AMD Omen 16提供了更好的每美元性能。然而,如果你看重更高的CPU性能和光线追踪潜力,那么你仍然想投资于英特尔-英伟达的解决方案。
尽管如此,仍有许多需要改进的地方。例如,显示屏下巴的边框太厚,导致其占地面积和重量都比竞争对手如华硕Zephyrus M16或 联想Legion S7.点击板太敏感了,如果在性能模式下,风扇的声音还是比一般的要大。用户可能要考虑在平衡模式下进行游戏,以获得明显更安静的风扇,尽管这需要对性能进行轻微的打击。
价格和可用性
我们的评测单元的配置是,现在在百思买发货。售价1580美元。然而,惠普正在对相同的配置进行销售,,低至900美元。发表时。Omen 16的英特尔-英伟达变体也广泛提供。
HP Omen 16-n0033dx
- 11/29/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo