2022年惠普Spectre x360 13.5回顾。巅峰的超便携可转换笔记本
的 最初的13.5英寸HP Spectre x360在2020年推出,它迅速成为我们最喜欢的可转换笔记本电脑在其大小的类。该 2021年的更新将引入很少的变化,基本上是相同的性能和用户体验。幸运的是,2022年的修订版除了明显的CPU升级外,还包括一些变化,感兴趣的用户肯定想知道。
我们审查的具体单位是高端配置,配备酷睿i7-1255U CPU,3000 x 2000 OLED触摸屏,以及16GB焊接内存,零售价约为1700美元。配备酷睿i5-1235U和1980 x 1280 IPS触摸屏的较少的SKU也可以以较低的价格获得。存在一个1000尼特的选项,但只适用于某些1280p IPS SKU。除此之外,所有选项都只配备集成显卡,没有广域网。
惠普Spectre x360 13.5的替代品包括其他专业消费者或以办公室为中心的13.5英寸笔记本电脑,如 框架笔记本电脑, 微软Surface Laptop 4 13,或 联想ThinkPad X1 Yoga系列。请注意,2022年的惠普机型被称为 "Spectre x360 13.5",而2020年或2021年的早期机型被称为 "Spectre x360 14"。我们怀疑制造商今年改变了这个名字,以更准确地反映13.5英寸的屏幕尺寸。
更多惠普评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90.3 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 17 mm | 13.50" | 3000x2000 | |
89.5 % v7 (old) | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.50" | 3000x2000 | ||
85.1 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.85 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
88.5 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE i5-1140G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.2 kg | 11.5 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
85.4 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Framework Laptop 13.5 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.85 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
84 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA SD 8cx Gen 2 5G, Adreno 680 | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 13.50" | 1920x1280 | |
85.2 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 R5 4680U, Vega 7 | 1.3 kg | 14 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 更加圆润和光滑
惠普为这次2022年的更新改造了2020年的设计。然而,大多数变化主要是表面上的,内部变化不大。用户可以通过更圆的边缘和角落、不同的键盘布局和重新定位的端口,很容易将2022年的机型与2020年的版本区分开来。否则,底盘的刚性仍然和以前一样强,给人以豪华的印象和感觉。我们特别欣赏惠普的设计,与封闭式的设计相比,惠普的设计更加适用和强大。 Surface Laptop 4 13和更加吱吱作响的 框架笔记本电脑,分别是。
无论是尺寸还是重量都没有改变2020年的原始设计,无论好坏。虽然这不一定是坏事,但还有其他几款13.5英寸笔记本电脑比我们的Spectre薄几毫米或更多,比如Surface Laptop 4、Framework Laptop或 联想ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1.
连接性 - 支持Thunderbolt 4
2022款保留了最初2021款的所有端口,尽管3.5毫米耳机插孔被重新定位。转角处的端口仍然是Spectre系列的一个显著特征。
SD卡阅读器
出于某种原因,惠普大大降低了MicroSD读卡器的性能,与上一代型号相比。将1GB的图像从我们的UHS-II测试卡移动到桌面需要大约21秒,而在老款Spectre x360 14上只需要5到6秒。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 (AV Pro UHS-II V60) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel (AV Pro UHS-II V60) | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 (AV Pro UHS-II V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 (AV Pro UHS-II V60) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel (AV Pro UHS-II V60) | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 (AV Pro UHS-II V60) |
沟通
英特尔AX211是Wi-Fi 6E和蓝牙5.2连接的标准配置。在与我们的6GHz网络配对时,传输速率稳定,没有问题。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel |
网络摄像头
惠普已经将集成的网络摄像头从2020年型号的1MP升级到2022年版本的5MP。更高的分辨率是所有次笔记本网络摄像头中最清晰的图片质量之一,这一点立刻就能看出来。事实上,这款Spectre是同尺寸类别中第一个集成500万像素网络摄像头的产品。然而,视频质量仍然限于30FPS的1080p。
网络摄像头快门和红外传感器分别用于支持隐私和Windows Hello。
维护
底部面板只需用一把Torx螺丝刀就能轻松拆下。我们很欣赏在橡胶底座下面没有隐藏的螺丝。
用户可以换掉固态硬盘和WLAN模块,而内存模块是固定的。如下面的对比图所示,WLAN模块在2021/2020型号上是不可以拆卸的。
配件和保修
零售包装盒包括一个携带套,磁性主动手写笔(MPP2.0 Tilt Pen),以及一个4口USB-C集线器(2个USB-A、HDMI和USB-C)。我们当然喜欢惠普抛出一堆有用的配件,而其他笔记本电脑制造商往往吝啬于此。
输入设备 - 舒适的键盘和大的点击板
键盘
与2020年的机型相比,惠普在2022年的修订版中完全取消了右列的按键。这意味着不再有PgUp、PgDn、Home或End的专用键,因为这些现在是与方向键相关的次要功能。如果你在日常工作中经常依赖这些按键,那么你可能会对这种突然的变化感到失望。
其他方面的按键布局和反馈都与2020年的机型非常接近,可以获得类似的打字体验。我们仍然认为惠普Spectre、Envy或EliteBook笔记本电脑上的键盘是最好的,因为它们不像其他大多数超极本那样有弹性或浅薄。
触摸板
与2020年的机型相比,这次的点击板甚至更大(12.5 x 8厘米对11.5 x 7.4厘米),可以实现更舒适的多点触摸输入。尽管如此,点击集成的鼠标按钮仍然感觉比我们希望的更柔软和更有弹性。
显示屏 - 相同的3:2 60 Hz三星OLED体验
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 351.7 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.78 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.11
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 SDC4160, OLED, 3000x2000, 13.5" | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng Samsung SDC4148, OLED, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel BOE CQ NE135FBM-N41, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE LPM135M467, IPS LED, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Framework Laptop 13.5 BOE CQ NE135FBM-N41, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA LGD0663, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 LQ135P1JX51, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | -18% | -20% | -18% | -21% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 69.9 -30% | 66.8 -33% | 69 -31% | 64.7 -35% | |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99.4 -1% | 98 -2% | 99.3 -1% | 97.2 -3% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 90.8 | 96.1 6% | 71.1 -22% | 68.6 -24% | 70.3 -23% | 66.9 -26% | |
Response Times | 106% | -1450% | -2603% | -2197% | -1683% | 10460% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.9 ? | 2 ? -5% | 34.7 ? -1726% | 64 ? -3268% | 55.6 ? -2826% | 44 ? -2216% | 62.8 ? -3205% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2.16 ? | 2 ? 7% | 27.5 ? -1173% | 44 ? -1937% | 36 ? -1567% | 27 ? -1150% | 39.8 ? -1743% |
PWM Frequency | 60.2 ? | 250 ? 315% | 21930 ? 36329% | ||||
Screen | 0% | -26% | 9% | -15% | -40% | -3% | |
Brightness middle | 351.7 | 370 5% | 449.6 28% | 465 32% | 449 28% | 250 -29% | 413 17% |
Brightness | 351 | 374 7% | 431 23% | 451 28% | 435 24% | 226 -36% | 400 14% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 90 3% | 90 3% | 92 6% | 93 7% | 82 -6% | 94 8% |
Black Level * | 0.01 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.39 | 0.215 | 0.29 | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.78 | 2.57 -44% | 2.76 -55% | 2 -12% | 2.34 -31% | 3.59 -102% | 2.8 -57% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.14 | 4.52 26% | 7.96 -30% | 4.7 23% | 7.07 -15% | 5.9 4% | 7.2 -17% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 2.2 4% | 5.2 -126% | 2.9 -26% | 4.7 -104% | 3.99 -73% | 1.9 17% |
Gamma | 2.11 104% | 2.36 93% | 2.23 99% | 2.09 105% | 2.29 96% | 2.98 74% | 2.12 104% |
CCT | 6683 97% | 6154 106% | 6475 100% | 6181 105% | 6760 96% | 6765 96% | 6510 100% |
Contrast | 37000 | 1450 | 1661 | 1151 | 1163 | 1424 | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.31 | 0.58 | 0.7 | 0.96 | 0.8 | ||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 85.8 | 61.6 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 97.2 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 36% /
27% | -498% /
-283% | -871% /
-474% | -743% /
-413% | -862% /
-451% | 3479% /
2608% |
* ... smaller is better
惠普宣传的P3全覆盖,我们可以通过自己的独立测量来确认。请确保通过惠普的菜单,打开命令中心,然后点击左下角附近的 "显示控制",根据需要设置颜色。
OLED面板在出厂时没有经过校准,可能是因为这不是一台EliteBook或专业笔记本电脑,这是一个耻辱,因为OLED能够再现准确的色彩。尽管如此,平均灰度和色彩deltaE值仍然非常好,分别只有2.3和1.78。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2.16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.96 ms rise | |
↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.92 ms rise | |
↘ 0.98 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60.2 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 60.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 60.2 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在所有的亮度水平上都存在闪烁,就像我们迄今为止测试的大多数其他OLED笔记本面板一样。在0到37%的亮度下,频率为238赫兹,而38到100%的亮度下,频率为60赫兹。
由于最大亮度没有改变,户外可视性仍然与原版相同。如果用户最关心的是可视性,他们可能想考虑1000尼特的IPS 1280p SKU。
性能--第12代英特尔的差异
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前,我们通过惠普命令中心软件将我们的设备设置为性能模式。建议用户熟悉这个软件,因为这里可以找到六个电源配置文件设置。智能感应(自动)、节电、安静、凉爽、平衡和性能。
处理器
CPU的性能非常好,多线程的结果比在Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1或惠普ProBook 450 G9的速度更快,它们都配备了相同的 酷睿i7-1255UCPU。值得庆幸的是,结果更接近于酷睿i7-1260P或 酷睿i7-1280P的速度约为1.5倍至2倍,比 酷睿i7-1165G7在去年的模型中。
我们建议避免使用低端的 酷睿i5-1235USKU,因为该选项几乎不比Core i7-1165G7快。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (4463 - 8821, n=11) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
HP ProBook 445 G8-3Z6Q8ES | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE | |
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (1560 - 1712, n=11) | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE | |
HP ProBook 445 G8-3Z6Q8ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (4313 - 8127, n=10) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (19813 - 41353, n=10) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (1325 - 2135, n=10) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (61375 - 65892, n=10) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (3577 - 5095, n=10) | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (11759 - 20187, n=10) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (27900 - 67458, n=10) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (393 - 640, n=10) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (2474 - 4400, n=10) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (13899 - 44054, n=10) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 |
系统性能
PCMark 10的分数一直比我们在过去的模型上记录的分数高,有时有很大的差距。我们怀疑转向新一代的CPU和PCIe4存储,而不是PCIe3或英特尔Optane,可能是PCMark 10性能提升的主要原因。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4676 - 5523, n=9) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9381 - 11654, n=9) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6530 - 7418, n=9) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4498 - 6203, n=9) | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1329 - 1573, n=9) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1364 - 1554, n=9) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1372 - 1660, n=9) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1117 - 1434, n=9) |
PCMark 10 Score | 5523 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (22846 - 67017, n=10) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (22877 - 67398, n=10) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (22883 - 65839, n=10) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (76 - 163.2, n=10) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示了在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时的DPC问题。在60FPS下的4K播放也不完美,在我们长达一分钟的测试视频中出现了7个丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试装置配备了一个 1TB美光3400(MTFDKBA1T0TFH)PCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘,连续读取和写入速度非常快,分别为6600 MB/s和5000 MB/s。虽然它被西部数据SN850所超越,特别是在较小的块大小方面,但我们的系统仍然能够长时间保持固态硬盘的最大传输速率,正如我们下面的DiskSpd循环结果所示。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA -8! |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - 相同的Iris Xe性能
图形性能只比我们在2021年型号上记录的快2%到17%,因为英特尔没有对集成的 Iris Xe 96 EUsGPU。虽然就集成图形而言,它仍然是一个很好的GPU,但它现在已经被最近发布的 Radeon 680M以相当大的优势超越。
请注意,如果在平衡模式而不是性能模式下运行,图形性能会明显下降,正如我们下面的3DMark 11结果所示。
3DMark 11 Performance | 6834 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20041 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4736 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1820 points | |
Help |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 113.9 | 100.9 | 24 | 10.3 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 94.8 | 50.1 | 32.7 | 14.8 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 117.8 | 92.2 | 68.1 | 62.4 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 43.4 | 23.8 | 16.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 40.4 | 41.1 | 36.2 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 89 | 40.8 | 32.4 | 26.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 22.6 | 18.6 | 14.2 | 11.2 |
排放--只是安静了一点点
系统噪音
从纸面上看,惠普通过增加比上一代机型更薄的风扇叶片,改进了散热方案。然而,在现实中,任何差异都很难被用户察觉。我们对2020年和2022年机型的风扇噪音测量,在游戏或运行其他高负载时几乎是一样的。2020年的机型即使在性能模式下也不是特别响亮,所以说在噪音方面没有大的改进,这并不是一种抱怨。替代品如联想ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1或框架笔记本电脑变得更快更响。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.5 / 23.5 / 23.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 27 / 42.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.5 dB(A) |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1140G7, Lenovo UMIS RPJTJ256MEE1OWX | Framework Laptop 13.5 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 WDS100T1X0E | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 Vega 7, R5 4680U, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -5% | -16% | -13% | -17% | -10% | |
off / environment * | 23.5 | 25.8 -10% | 22.8 3% | 25.61 -9% | 23.9 -2% | 24.6 -5% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.5 | 25.9 -10% | 23 2% | 25.61 -9% | 23.9 -2% | 24.6 -5% |
Idle Average * | 23.5 | 25.9 -10% | 23 2% | 25.61 -9% | 23.9 -2% | 24.6 -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.5 | 25.9 -10% | 23 2% | 25.61 -9% | 23.9 -2% | 24.6 -5% |
Load Average * | 27 | 26.4 2% | 47.3 -75% | 40.14 -49% | 45.6 -69% | 39.5 -46% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.2 | 36.9 -2% | 47.3 -31% | 47.1 -30% | ||
Load Maximum * | 42.4 | 41.5 2% | 49.8 -17% | 40.14 5% | 47.9 -13% | 39.5 7% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
尽管处理器性能有所提高,但较新机型的表面温度比旧机型低。即使在桌面上空转,顶部和底部热点也分别显示出约6℃和7℃的巨大差异。在极端的处理压力下,两款机型的键盘热点大致相同,都是37℃。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 19 °C / 66 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 22.4 °C / 72.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+5.6 °C / 10.1 F).
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE Intel Core i5-1140G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 680 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -21% | -15% | -25% | -20% | -6% | -21% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 36.4 | 37.1 -2% | 36.8 -1% | 46.3 -27% | 47.2 -30% | 34.3 6% | 45.8 -26% |
Maximum Bottom * | 37 | 43.1 -16% | 42.4 -15% | 43.3 -17% | 39.4 -6% | 35.4 4% | 45.5 -23% |
Idle Upper Side * | 20.8 | 29 -39% | 24.2 -16% | 26.8 -29% | 25.2 -21% | 25.7 -24% | 24.9 -20% |
Idle Bottom * | 22.6 | 28.6 -27% | 29 -28% | 28.3 -25% | 27.8 -23% | 25.1 -11% | 25.7 -14% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当在性能模式下运行Prime95时,CPU时钟频率、温度和电路板功耗将在最初几秒钟内分别飙升至3.2 GHz、99 C和44 W,然后稳步下降并稳定在2.8 GHz、97 C和28 W。核心温度将保持非常高,表明冷却解决方案被推到极限,以适应要求苛刻的Alder Lake CPU。然而,我们很欣赏这次的性能和温度至少是稳定的,而不是在重复同样的情况下的循环行为。 在2020 -U模型上重复同样的压力测试时的循环行为。2020Tiger Lake-U模型上重复同样的压力测试时的循环行为。在平衡模式下,CPU时钟速率、温度和功耗都会进一步下降,分别为2.0GHz、75C和18W。
当运行在性能模式时,GPU时钟速率将稳定在大约1147 MHz,而温度将在72 C至97 C之间循环。 Witcher 3性能模式下,温度将在72 C至97 C之间循环。稳定的时钟速率解决了我们在2020模式下观察到的循环帧率问题,使游戏性能更加稳定。如果在平衡模式下运行,GPU时钟速率将下降到998兆赫,同时还有其他不足之处,如下图所示。
用电池供电运行限制了性能。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将返回物理和图形分数,分别为11227和6194分,而在主电源上则为14505和6243分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 39 |
Prime95压力(性能模式) | 2.8 | -- | 97 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力(性能模式) | 1.4 - 2.3 | 750 - 850 | 79 - 96 |
Witcher 3 压力(平衡模式) | ~1.9 | 998 | 74 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能模式) | ~1.9 - 4.0 | 1147 | 72 - 97 |
发言人
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--比以前更有要求
消耗功率
在桌面上空转消耗4瓦到13瓦,取决于亮度设置和电源配置文件。事实上,由于OLED面板的原因,一个全白的屏幕在最大亮度设置下会比全黑的屏幕多消耗8W的电量。用户可以通过选择较深的显示颜色而不是白色来延长电池寿命。
尽管图形性能同比有小幅提升,但运行3DMark 06需要的功率比运行在旧的第11代CPU上的2021年Spectre x360 14多50%。更高的耗电量主要归因于更高的Turbo Boost潜力,因此,CPU的封装耗电量。
我们能够从小型(约9.6 x 5.3 x 2.2厘米)的65瓦交流适配器上记录到临时的最大耗电量,如下图所示,当CPU处于100%的利用率时。
Off / Standby | 0.19 / 0.46 Watt |
Idle | 4 / 4.9 / 12.5 Watt |
Load |
48.1 / 65.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, OLED, 3000x2000, 13.5" | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H), OLED, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QB0016GE i5-1140G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Lenovo UMIS RPJTJ256MEE1OWX, IPS LED, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Framework Laptop 13.5 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 WDS100T1X0E, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA SD 8cx Gen 2 5G, Adreno 680, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 R5 4680U, Vega 7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -23% | -23% | 13% | -9% | 51% | 10% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4 | 6.3 -58% | 5.3 -33% | 3.75 6% | 4.3 -8% | 2.3 42% | 3.4 15% |
Idle Average * | 4.9 | 11.2 -129% | 8.4 -71% | 7.75 -58% | 8.2 -67% | 3.7 24% | 6.3 -29% |
Idle Maximum * | 12.5 | 13.3 -6% | 11.2 10% | 8.69 30% | 8.7 30% | 5.6 55% | 8.1 35% |
Load Average * | 48.1 | 32 33% | 57.4 -19% | 33.12 31% | 43.5 10% | 13 73% | 36.2 25% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.8 | 46.7 -30% | 28.7 20% | 43.5 -22% | |||
Load Maximum * | 65.2 | 35.6 45% | 61.2 6% | 35.19 46% | 61.8 5% | 25 62% | 64.1 2% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
电池容量为66Wh,与上一代机型相比没有变化。实际的WLAN运行时间几乎保持在8小时,但如果只是在桌面上闲置,较新的机型可以多持续几个小时。对于14英寸超极本来说,8小时的标志是平均水平。华硕华硕ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA持续时间约为2小时,尽管它配备了更快的独立Nvidia MX图形。
从空电到满电只需要不到2小时。
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 66 Wh | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 66 Wh | Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh | Framework Laptop 13.5 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh | HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA SD 8cx Gen 2 5G, Adreno 680, 46 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 R5 4680U, Vega 7, 47.4 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -6% | -7% | -1% | 86% | 36% | |
Reader / Idle | 1223 | 803 -34% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 481 | 466 -3% | 447 -7% | 478 -1% | 874 82% | 653 36% |
Load | 133 | 157 18% | 251 89% | |||
H.264 | 666 |
Pros
Cons
评语--值得拥有的消费型敞篷车
2022年的Spectre x360 13.5解决了我们在最初的2020年型号中遇到的一些问题。也就是说,现在的性能更加稳定,游戏时的时钟速率和帧速率都更加稳定。原始的CPU性能明显高于第11代英特尔,而不一定需要明显的运行温度或声音。然而,功耗要高得多,但至少在简单浏览网页或流媒体视频时,电池寿命似乎没有受到影响。
Spectre x360 13.5只差一两个功能,就能成为专业消费者的成熟EliteBook。它比同类的13英寸折叠机要重一些,大一些,但用户获得了更高的性能和任何副笔记本上最好的网络摄像头之一。
其他主要变化包括高分辨率的500万像素网络摄像头、PCIe4存储、可移动的WLAN模块、更大的点击板、修订的键盘布局和更慢的MicroSD性能。其中一些是受欢迎的升级,但不是每个人都会喜欢这个型号的键盘按键比2020年的版本少,以及MicroSD读卡器较慢的事实。
用户可能会欣赏集成的USB-A端口,而其他13英寸的转换机,如戴尔XPS 13 9310二合一 或联想ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga ,只有USB-C。然而,这些替代品比我们的惠普略微轻薄,这意味着如果你真的重视Spectre x360 13.5的500万像素网络摄像头和USB-A端口,你将不得不选择一个更大的系统。
对于未来的机型,我们很希望看到预校准的显示屏、5G广域网选项、90或120赫兹的OLED面板,以及更窄的顶部边框。如今的Spectre笔记本已经非常接近EliteBook的价格,这意味着更高级的可配置选项并不是不合理的。
价格和可用性
2022年Spectre x360 13.5现在通过百思买和惠普官方在线商店广泛发售,基本的Core i5和1280p IPS SKU起价1200美元,最高端的Core i7 2000p OLED SKU起价1750美元。
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000
- 08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo