智能手机 "超凡脱俗"--Realme GT 7 Pro 评测
Galaxy S25 超级杀手
极亮的显示屏、超大的电池和性能惊人的骁龙 8 精英版，再加上Android 手机使用的超声波指纹传感器和超快充电，都是上上之选。Realme 通过 IP69 认证的 GT7 Pro 是否正在打造 1000 欧元（约合人民币 1038 元）以下的最佳手机？更新：我们已收到来自 Realme 德国公司关于 "软件 "和 "配件 "部分的反馈意见
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
判决
在日常使用中，Realme GT7 Pro 一看就给人留下了深刻印象，给人一种旗舰机的感觉。做工和选材都是一流的，快速 OLED 屏幕非常明亮，校准也非常好。虽然没有采用 LTPO 技术，但对于这款顶级手机的大容量储能来说并不是问题。
不过，再仔细一看，GT7 Pro 确实在某些方面丢了分，比如摄像头或功能（没有 UWB 芯片、没有 Qi 标准、只有 USB 2.0......）。仔细观察，Realme 手机与当前高端手机的区别还体现在一些小的方面，比如更新保证期缩短、显示屏边缘更宽、采用中档保护玻璃或连接性不足。尽管存在这些小缺点，但对于重视性价比和高性能的用户来说，Realme GT7 Pro 仍然是一个极具吸引力的选择。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
Realme GT7 Pro 目前仅在德语国家销售 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 闪存版本，零售价为 999 欧元（约合人民币 1037 元），包括在德国亚马逊（Amazon.de）。作为一款进口产品，这款旗舰杀手级手机的CN 版本起价约为 560 欧元（约合人民币 581 元），另外还有 16 GB 版本可供选择。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 85.9%  | Realme GT7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Back Protector ... 2. $14.99 Vaxson Privacy Screen Protec... 3. $6.88 Damolong Screen Protector Co... List Price: 999€ | 223 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" 2780x1264 450 PPI AMOLED |
2. 87.6%  | OnePlus 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $12.99 2+2 Pcs Screen Protector One... 2. $7.99 Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design... 3. $8.99 Suttkue for OnePlus 13 Scree... List Price: 720€ | 213 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.82" 3168x1440 510 PPI AMOLED |
3. 89.9%  | Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB | Amazon: 1. $9.29 Anbzsign (2+2 Pack for Xiaom... 2. $7.99 3 Pack Kicvbnco for Xiaomi 1... 3. $19.98 For Xiaomi Charger 67W Mi Tu... List Price: 810€ | 213 g | 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.73" 3200x1440 521 PPI AMOLED |
4. 86.7%  | Vivo X200 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘ 15 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $11.99 TNKISRY Tempered Glass for V... 2. $11.99 MAOUICI Glass for Vivo X200 ... 3. $22.98 AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr... List Price: 850€ | 223 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" 2800x1260 453 PPI OLED |
5. 89.8% v7 (old)  | Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: $849.99 List Price: 1149€ | 196 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 3120x1440 513 PPI AMOLED |
Table of Contents
- 判决
- Realme GT 7 Pro 的规格
- 保护壳 - Realme GT 7 Pro，IP 保护等级
- 功能 - 配备 USB 2.0 的顶级手机
- 软件 - Realme GT 7 Pro，含Android 15
- 通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 功能的 Realme GT 7 Pro
- 电话功能和语音质量 - 双卡双待智能手机
- 摄像头 - 配备 OIS 的 Realme GT 7 Pro
- 配件和保修 - 带 [无] 电源装置的 Realme 手机
- 输入设备和操作 - 配备面部解锁功能的 Realme GT 7 Pro
- 显示屏 - OLED 高级手机
- 性能 - 配备高通 SoC 的 Realme GT 7 Pro
- 排放 - 配备 3D 冷却系统的智能手机
- 电池续航时间 - 配备大容量电池的 Realme GT 7 Pro
- Notebookcheck 总体评分
得益于骁龙 8 精英版和快速内存连接，Realme 将 GT7 Pro 定位为性能旗舰。不过，这款上档次的手机并不局限于蛮横的性能，除了搭载 高通 SoC技术组件。
得益于现代 SiC 电池技术，6500 毫安时的容量非常宽裕，充电速度也非常高，可达 120 瓦。根据数据表显示，6.78 英寸的 GT7 Pro 峰值亮度也达到了 6500 尼特，摄像头系统也仅为部分经济型。除了潜望镜镜头外，还配备了支持 8K 的光学防抖索尼传感器。
Realme GT 7 Pro 的规格
保护壳 - Realme GT 7 Pro，IP 保护等级
Realme GT7 Pro 的做工非常精致，背面采用了抢眼的 "火星 "设计，正面则是圆润的 OLED 显示屏。使用的保护玻璃（大猩猩 7i 玻璃）和 6.78 英寸屏幕周围有些宽的边缘让人明显感觉到 GT7 Pro 并不总是处于高端水平。屏占比 "只有 "89%，明显低于我们的对比设备。
得益于 IP69 认证，这款高端手机可以防水，即使水深达到 2 米（约 6.5 英尺）。通过 "水下模式"，GT7 Pro 可以在水下拍摄照片和视频，不过制造商表示这款高级手机不适合专业潜水。要在水下模式下使用触摸屏，需要在设置中增加一个 "水下 "菜单。
功能 - 配备 USB 2.0 的顶级手机
GT7 Pro 配备了红外热像仪、蓝牙 5.4、USB OTG、NFC 和 Miracast，功能非常全面； 与许多竞争对手不同的是，GT7 Pro 没有超宽带芯片。与许多竞争对手不同的是，GT7 Pro 缺少了超宽带芯片、快速 USB 标准和有线图像输出。在我们的拷贝测试中，Realme 手机的 USB 2.0 端口与三星 980 Pro（M2.SSD 硬盘）的传输速率相对较慢，仅为 41 MB/s。连接的存储介质可使用 NTFS 或 exFAT 格式化。
软件 - Realme GT 7 Pro，含Android 15
GT7 Pro 预装了Android 15 和 6.0 版本的内部 Realme UI。在测试期间，操作系统基于 2024 年 12 月起的安全补丁，可能到 2028 年才会提供与安全相关的更新。操作系统升级的有效期仅为三年，在此期限内，Realme UI 将无法升级。价格并不算好。
2025 年 2 月 8 日更新：Realme 保证四年的安全补丁和四年的Android 升级。
可持续性
可持续发展不是 GT7 Pro 的营销重点，因此无法获得有关材料提取或可回收性的信息。不过，这款智能手机的包装似乎不含塑料。设备本身用铝箔包裹，而包装的其他部分则由纸板制成。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 功能的 Realme GT 7 Pro
这款高端手机支持接入快速的移动 5G 网络，在德语国家使用 4G 网络也应该没有问题。不过，GT7 Pro 的 19 个频段的 LTE 覆盖范围比普通手机有限。 高端智能手机.
在家庭 Wi-Fi 网络中，Realme 手机提供了现代 Wi-Fi 7，但与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 结合使用时，"只能 "达到约 1,000 Mbit/s 的峰值传输速率。原因是不支持 6 GHz。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Average Wi-Fi 7 (556 - 1801, n=54) | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (49.8 - 1801, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average Wi-Fi 7 (565 - 1875, n=54) | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (52 - 1857, n=184, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| Average Wi-Fi 7 (563 - 1945, n=40) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (521 - 1945, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average Wi-Fi 7 (451 - 1864, n=40) | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (451 - 1864, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
与我们的参考设备（Garmin Venu 2）相比，Realme 手机的定位效果令人信服，尽管在路线记录方面存在一些小误差。得益于双频 GNSS，我们只能检测到与 GT7 Pro 实际使用路线的细微偏差。
电话功能和语音质量 - 双卡双待智能手机
GT7 Pro 支持两张 nanoSIM 卡，但不集成 eSIM。不过，这款来自 Realme 的旗舰产品支持 VoLTE 和通过家庭 Wi-Fi 通话（Wi-Fi 通话）。语音质量清晰，声音响亮、清晰。
摄像头 - 配备 OIS 的 Realme GT 7 Pro
GT7 Pro 的主摄像头像素为 5000 万像素，采用 1/1.56 英寸格式的索尼 IMX906。在日光下，照片具有良好的锐度和动感。不过，在色彩平衡方面，这款高端手机的图像在冷色调和暖色调之间波动明显。绿色和蓝色色调也容易过度饱和。
由于传感器较小，弱光场景不是 GT7 Pro 的强项。另一方面，这款高端智能手机提供了一个非常不错的 5000 万像素长焦镜头，可拍摄出具有竞争力的照片，放大倍率高达 5 倍，并可进行包括 OIS 在内的三倍无损变焦。超广角摄像头的焦距相当于 35 毫米，焦距为 16 毫米，像素为 800 万，在日常使用中也能给人留下深刻印象。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide AngleWide AngleLow Light Ultra Wide AngleZoom 5x
配件和保修 - 带 [无] 电源装置的 Realme 手机
GT7 Pro 的供货范围包括一条 USB 电缆（USB-A 转 USB-C）、一个保护盖、 一个 120 瓦模块化电源装置、一个 SIM 卡针以及一份包含保修条件的快速入门指南。出厂时未安装保护膜。
保修期 保修期在德国的保修期为 24 个月。
2025 年 2 月 8 日更新：至少对德国客户而言，包装盒中没有 120 瓦电源装置。
输入设备和操作 - 配备面部解锁功能的 Realme GT 7 Pro
6.78 英寸屏幕上的输入可以精确地直接输入到触摸屏的边角。OLED 面板的采样率高达 2,600 Hz，对触摸的反应速度极快，灵敏度极高。线性振动电机（X 轴）可在日常使用中提供愉悦的触觉反馈，但我们认为它还可以更清晰一些。
它安装了第二代高通超声波指纹传感器来检测手指，即使是湿手也能可靠、快速地识别。根据 Realme 的说法，GT7 Pro 仅需 0.1 秒即可完成这一操作。
显示屏 - OLED 高级手机
GT7 Pro 使用三星的 Eco2 OLED Plus 显示屏，这种有机显示屏不需要单独的偏振片层，因此能耗较低。不过，由于没有使用 LTPO 技术，这意味着系统无法动态调节 120 Hz 的刷新率。如果想要省电，可以使用 60 Hz。
分辨率为 1,264p 的屏幕分辨率为 450 ppi，清晰度很高，但在最大亮度方面与预期有很大差距。我们无法证实 GT7 Pro 的最大亮度为 6500 尼特。我们使用 APL18 模式测量的结果是 2,662 cd/m²，而在播放 4K 视频材料时，显示屏的亮度为 2,687 cd/m²，这两个数值都非常不错。Realme 手机还支持多种 HDR 标准（HDR10、HDR10+、杜比视界、HLG），并通过了德国莱茵 TÜV 的两次认证（无闪烁、低蓝光）。
GT7 Pro 采用频率高达 1851 Hz 的 PWM 来控制亮度。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 2139 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
| Realme GT7 Pro AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8" | OnePlus 13 AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8" | Xiaomi 15 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7" | Vivo X200 Pro OLED, 2800x1260, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy S24+ AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -31% | -60% | -5% | -113% | |
| Brightness middle | 2139 | 1155 -46% | 1016 -53% | 1828 -15% | 1358 -37% |
| Brightness | 2131 | 1155 -46% | 1017 -52% | 1828 -14% | 1358 -36% |
| Brightness Distribution | 99 | 98 -1% | 98 -1% | 94 -5% | 92 -7% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.8 | 1 -25% | 1.15 -44% | 0.7 12% | 3 -275% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.5 | 1.8 -20% | 3.57 -138% | 1.6 -7% | 4.4 -193% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1.6 -45% | 1.9 -73% | 1.1 -0% | 2.5 -127% |
| Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.3 96% | 2.2 100% | 2.25 98% | 1.98 111% |
| CCT | 6582 99% | 6503 100% | 6677 97% | 6520 100% | 6656 98% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz Amplitude: 14.6 % Secondary Frequency: 1851 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8623 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
我们使用 CalMan 的照片光谱仪和软件进行的分析表明，这款顶级手机在 sRGB 色彩空间中的平均 Delta-E 偏差非常低。除了四种色彩配置文件外，白平衡也可以在设置菜单中单独调整。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.677 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.587 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.05 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.613 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.4405 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). | ||
GT7 Pro 在户外给人的印象非常好，可视角度的稳定性也令人印象深刻。Realme 手机拥有足够的亮度储备，可以应对夏季的光线环境。不过，玻璃表面的反光还是会让人感到恼火。
性能 - 配备高通 SoC 的 Realme GT 7 Pro
Realme 智能手机搭载 骁龙 8 精英版并使用 Adreno 830进行图形计算。虽然 GT7 Pro 已被发现在某些基准测试中作弊，但 GT 模式下的结果却出人意料地不如高通竞争对手。尤其是在 Geekbench 的 CPU 基准测试中，多核成绩并不令人振奋。
在 GPU 测试中，Realme GT7 Pro 的屏幕外数值也只有部分令人信服。在这里 一加 13或 小米 15 Pro的表现要好得多。Geekbench AI 也是如此。
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (8865 - 22767, n=8) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Geekbench AI | |
| Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (51 - 9453, n=24, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (275 - 716, n=6) | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (293 - 722, n=6) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (51 - 1501, n=24, last 2 years) | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (123 - 13084, n=24, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (594 - 1698, n=6) | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| AI Benchmark - Score V6 | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (302 - 10957, n=8) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (68.9 - 10957, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
| OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131) | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (89.7 - 289, n=10) | |
| Realme GT7 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (342 - 419, n=5) | |
| Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=151, last 2 years) | |
| Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
| OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131) | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (15.3 - 34, n=9) | |
| Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
| OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131) | |
| Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (125 - 255, n=8) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121) | |
| Realme GT7 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131) | |
| Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (37943 - 94399, n=9) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| Realme GT7 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Realme GT7 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (422 - 685, n=9) | |
| OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131) | |
| Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Realme GT7 Pro | OnePlus 13 | Xiaomi 15 Pro | Vivo X200 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S24+ | Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -7% | 15% | -3% | -35% | 1% | -37% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 4076.63 | 3984.23 -2% | 3998.65 -2% | 2694.85 -34% | 2450.9 -40% | 3681 ? -10% | 1931 ? -53% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 3909.68 | 3684.36 -6% | 3673.38 -6% | 2174.26 -44% | 1523.87 -61% | 3054 ? -22% | 1549 ? -60% |
| Random Read 4KB | 332.34 | 301.29 -9% | 409.67 23% | 317.29 -5% | 387.42 17% | 383 ? 15% | 279 ? -16% |
| Random Write 4KB | 384.61 | 344.63 -10% | 555.55 44% | 658.43 71% | 176.19 -54% | 462 ? 20% | 319 ? -17% |
排放 - 配备 3D 冷却系统的智能手机
温度
在持续负载条件下，表面温度明显升高，对于配备 骁龙 8 精英版但并不是特别高。我们测量到的最高温度仅为 44 °C（111.2 °F）。这也反映在 3DMark 压力测试中。GT7 Pro 的性能并不特别稳定，但节流比较适中，最高为 35%。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
| Realme GT7 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
发言人
Realme GT7 Pro 采用双扬声器系统，音量很大，我们测得的最大音量接近 90 dB(A)。我们的粉红噪声测量结果显示，中音的频率曲线不断上升，高音也更加均匀。不过，还是能感觉到轻微的低音。
如果您想与外部设备一起使用声音输出，可以使用有线 USB 端口或无线蓝牙 5.4。
Realme GT7 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 13 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - 配备大容量电池的 Realme GT 7 Pro
能源消耗
GT7 Pro 的电池容量非常大，达到了 6,500 mAh，这保证了它在日常使用中出色的续航时间，因为我们测量的耗电量也比较合理。由于采用了 SuperVOOC 充电技术，双电池系统（每组 3250 毫安时）的充电速度也非常快。根据制造商的说法，使用适当的 120 瓦电源装置，只需 37 分钟即可为储能装置充满电。不过，由于我们的媒体样品没有配备充电器，因此无法验证这一数值。
| Off / Standby |   0.21 / 0.44 Watt |
| Idle |  0.83 / 0.96 / 1.03 Watt |
| Load |
8.44 / 8.86 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Realme GT7 Pro 6500 mAh | OnePlus 13 6000 mAh | Xiaomi 15 Pro 6100 mAh | Vivo X200 Pro 6000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S24+ 4900 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -45% | 8% | -31% | 1% | -26% | -22% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.83 | 0.86 -4% | 0.6 28% | 0.43 48% | 0.43 48% | 0.789 ? 5% | 0.877 ? -6% |
| Idle Average * | 0.96 | 1.74 -81% | 0.9 6% | 1.76 -83% | 0.84 12% | 1.336 ? -39% | 1.456 ? -52% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.03 | 1.85 -80% | 1.1 -7% | 1.83 -78% | 0.95 8% | 1.417 ? -38% | 1.607 ? -56% |
| Load Average * | 8.44 | 10.69 -27% | 6.7 21% | 9.58 -14% | 6.76 20% | 9.54 ? -13% | 6.72 ? 20% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.86 | 11.92 -35% | 9.5 -7% | 11.43 -29% | 16.42 -85% | 12.7 ? -43% | 10.1 ? -14% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power Consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
在现实条件下，GT7 Pro 在显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m² 的 Wi-Fi 测试中显示出了出色的运行时间。电池续航时间超过 22 小时，可以让这款顶级手机长时间保持活力。值得一提的是，当电池电量不足（2%）时，所有应用程序都会自动关闭，并启动极致节能模式。
| Realme GT7 Pro 6500 mAh | OnePlus 13 6000 mAh | Xiaomi 15 Pro 6100 mAh | Vivo X200 Pro 6000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S24+ 4900 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 1327 | 1349 2% | 1444 9% | 1404 6% | 1009 -24% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Realme GT 7 Pro 是一款一流的智能手机，但它并不总能达到宣传的超级水准。我们的测试留下了很大的问号，尤其是在潜在的极高显示亮度方面。
Realme GT7 Pro
- 02/06/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
