Notebookcheck Logo
OnePlus 13 in review (Image Source: Marcus Herbrich)

OnePlus 13 智能手机评测:让电池革命开始吧

无与伦比的价格零件比

最新的 OnePlus 旗舰手机采用了最好的组件,价格相对于竞争对手也比较实惠。骁龙 8 Elite SoC 以及 Si/C 电池和 MagSafe 无线充电等技术一应俱全。不过,OnePlus 13 也有一些需要妥协的地方。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone

评价:近乎完美

十多年来,新型石墨烯电池技术一直被认为是智能手机领域的 "圣杯",其运行时间和能量密度令人难以置信。

现在,这场备受瞩目的革命似乎终于要从硅碳电池开始了。除了出色的续航时间外,OnePlus 的最新旗舰手机还因其低重量而受益于新的碳化硅半导体。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

与步步高的表兄弟 OPPO Find X8 Pro 相比,OPPO Find X8 Pro 在摄像头方面做了一些妥协。但在典型的日常使用中,这些影响并不明显。不过,OnePlus 13 略胜一筹,因为它采用了性能更强的骁龙 8 Elite 芯片组。

高通公司的最新旗舰 SoC 在高负载情况下也会过度消耗 "普通 "智能手机的散热系统,至少 OnePlus 13 就是这种情况。

总而言之,我们非常喜欢 OnePlus 这款新旗舰。除了明显的节流现象外,它没有严重的弱点。如果您在购买智能手机时对可持续性非常看重,那么您还应该考虑一下三星或谷歌。Pixel 9 Pro 和Galaxy S24+ 都提供了更长的更新周期和更高的软件更新透明度。

Pros

+ 运行时间长
+ 高性能
+ 出色的 4K PWM 显示屏
+ 快速充电 + 电源适配器
+ 良好的摄像头封装

Cons

- 无 6 千兆赫无线局域网
- 软件支持不明确
- 高节流
- (目前)仅作为 ColorOS 的导入
- 可持续性不足

价格和供应情况

在中国,运行 ColorOS 15 的 OnePlus 13 起价为 4500 日元(约合 580 欧元),配备 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间。作为一款进口设备,在测试期间,我们的租赁商Tradingshenzen提供的入门级机型售价约为 720 欧元。

如果要购买配备 24GB 内存和 1TB 存储空间的 OnePlus 13 顶配版,感兴趣的买家需要准备约 940 欧元的预算。不过,作为 OnePlus 12 的继任者,OnePlus 很可能会很快推出入门级全球版本,其建议零售价约为 1,000 欧元。 一加 12(零售价:949 欧元起)的继任者,甚至在中国的售价也略有上涨。

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
87.6%
OnePlus 13
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $15.99
Ringke Dual Easy Film [4-Lay...
2. $544.49
OnePlus Pad 2-12GB RAM + 256...
3. $9.99
Suttkue for OnePlus 13 Scree...
List Price: 720€
213 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"
3168x1440
510 PPI
AMOLED
2.
87.3%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $15.99
AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr...
2. 
AKABEILA [1 Pack Privacy Scr...
3. $12.98
Puccy 2 Pack Back Protector ...
List Price: 1199€
215 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"
2780x1264
450 PPI
AMOLED
3.
89.8% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
List Price: 1149€
196 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"
3120x1440
513 PPI
AMOLED
4.
84.9%
Google Pixel 9
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
1. $607.94
Google Pixel 9 - Unlocked An...
2. $949.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - Unlo...
3. $9.99
LK 2 Pack for Google Pixel 9...
List Price: 899€
198 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.30"
2424x1080
421 PPI
OLED
5.
88.1%
OnePlus 12
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon: $615.40
List Price: 979 EUR
220 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"
3168x1440
510 PPI
AMOLED

传统上,OnePlus 的主要优势在于其高端机型采用了最强大的 高通芯片组因此,2024 旗舰机型在这方面也不例外。OnePlus 13 采用了新的 骁龙 8 精英版搭配高达 24 GB 的内存和最大 1 TB 的 UFS 4.0 存储空间,硬件配置相当强劲。

除此之外,OnePlus 还推出了一些新功能,例如超声波指纹传感器和支持无线充电的 MagSafe 或 Oppo Mag。

OnePlus 13 采用的电池技术也令人兴奋,因为硅碳电池不仅更安全、更耐用,而且还能提供高能量密度。此前,Honor ,OnePlus 13 已经用硅碳电池取代了传统的锂离子电池。 Magic6 Pro等其他制造商也纷纷效仿。

希望这只是智能手机电池革命的开始,因为这一技术的发展已经带来了 令人难以置信的标称电量.

那些热衷于哈苏品牌最佳相机的用户可能会发现 OPPO Find X8 Pro更有诱惑力,因为 OnePlus 正在通过偷工减料来实现诱人的价格。

尽管如此,OnePlus 一加 12提供了一个相当大的 1/1.4 英寸格式主传感器和一个潜望式长焦镜头,它应该会受益于哈苏的色彩调校。

OnePlus 13
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
, 12GB / 16GB / 18GB
Display
6.82 inch 19.8:9, 3168 x 1440 pixel 510 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 256GB / 512GB / 1TB, 458 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB Type C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, OTG, Miracast
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, GSM, UMTS, LTE, 5G, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 162.9 x 76.5
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-Carbon-Anode
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.6, 23mm) + 50MP (3x optical zoom, f/2.6, 73mm) + 50MP (f/2.0, 15mm)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.4, 21mm
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, SIM tool, info material, charger, case, ColorOS 15, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, BT Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptx, aptx-HD, LDAC, LHDC (5.0), GNSS: Beidou (B1I+B1C+B2a), GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), Galileo (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5); HDR: HLG, HDR10+, HDR10 , fanless, waterproof
Weight
213 g, Power Supply: 127 g
Price
720 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

打造:OnePlus 旗舰终于获得 IP69 等级认证

手机的整体外观没有大的变化。继 一加 12再次采用了 6.82 英寸的显示屏尺寸,不过与前代产品相比,边缘略有缩小。

这赋予了 OnePlus 13 更现代的外观,而这也体现在 90.7% 的高效屏占比上。尽管外壳尺寸略小,甚至在所有尺寸上都通过了 IP69 认证,但制造商还是将电池容量增加到了高达 6,000 mAh。

这确实很了不起,因为这款手机的厚度不到 9 毫米,仍然是一款轻薄的旗舰产品,重量仅为 210 克,轻得令人愉快。由于通过了 IP69 认证,OnePlus 13 理论上也可以用高压水枪清洗。

OnePlus 13 的颜色(图片来源:OnePlus)
OnePlus 13 的颜色(图片来源:OnePlus)

OnePlus 再次推出了三种颜色的旗舰产品,但除了两个玻璃后壳版本外,这次还有一个素食皮革版本可供选择。

具体的材质尚不清楚,但正面采用的是 Crystal Shield 玻璃,而不是大猩猩玻璃。得益于背面的纹理,在我们的白色测试样品上,指纹不是问题,而且 OnePlus 13 的质量也并不差。

不过,后盖给人的感觉并不一定是玻璃材质,而更像是高品质的塑料。按照中国制造商的惯例,其旗舰产品的外壳左侧有一个用于声音和振动管理的三段式开关(警报滑块)。

OnePlus 13(图片来源:Marcus Herbrich)
OnePlus 13(图片来源:Marcus Herbrich)
OnePlus 13(图片来源:Marcus Herbrich)
OnePlus 13(图片来源:Marcus Herbrich)
OnePlus 13(图片来源:Marcus Herbrich)

尺寸比较

164.3 mm 75.8 mm 9.2 mm 220 g162.9 mm 76.5 mm 8.5 mm 213 g162.3 mm 76.7 mm 8.2 mm 215 g158.5 mm 75.9 mm 7.7 mm 196 g152.8 mm 72 mm 8.5 mm 198 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能快速 USB 3.2 和板载红外爆破器

OnePlus 13 提供了一系列吸引人的功能,包括蓝牙 5.4、红外爆破器、Miracast 和用于非接触式支付的 NFC。USB-C 端口符合 3.2 规范,在我们使用连接的 M.2 固态硬盘(三星 980 Pro)进行的拷贝测试中,传输速度高达 238 MB/s。连接的存储介质可使用 NTFS 或 exFAT 格式化。使用合适的适配器,还可以通过端口输出图像。

我们的测试样品提供 512 GB 的 UFS 4.0 内存,但由于操作系统和一些预装应用程序的原因,实际可用存储空间要小得多,只有 458 GB。如果您需要更多空间,可以使用 USB-OTG 将文件传输到记忆棒等外部存储介质;但无法使用 microSD 卡扩展内存。

左:警报滑块
左:警报滑块
右侧音量摇杆、电源
右侧音量摇杆、电源
顶部:扬声器、麦克风、红外爆破器
顶部:扬声器、麦克风、红外爆破器
底部扬声器、麦克风、USB 端口、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽
底部扬声器、麦克风、USB 端口、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽

软件:ColorOS 15,更新周期长

我们的 OnePlus 13 配备了基于Android 15 的 ColorOS 15.0 版本。由于 OnePlus 13 的全球版本尚未推出,因此没有原生支持谷歌 PlayStore 和谷歌应用的 OxygenOS。不过,可以在设置中为 ColorOS 激活谷歌移动服务。

基于 OxygenOS 的全球版本将很快发布,但全球 ROM 的更新范围尚不清楚。

OnePlus 也对 ColorOS 的具体更新时间保持沉默。全球 前身OnePlus 13 的全球前身计划接受四次主要更新和五年的安全补丁,这并不坏。

不过,OnePlus 13 的全球前身是谷歌 Pixel、 谷歌 Pixel三星Galaxy手机的更新周期要长得多。我们设备上的安全补丁是截至 2024 年 11 月的最新版本。

ColorOS 15:主屏幕
ColorOS 15:主屏幕
主屏幕定制
主屏幕定制
设置页面
设置页面
通知灯罩
通知灯罩

可持续性

在可持续发展方面,OnePlus 肯定还有一些工作要做。我们找到的上一份(公开)可持续发展报告是 2020 年的,OnePlus 13 没有提供任何关于材料选择的信息,也没有就 "回收 "这一主题进行透明的沟通。

制造商自己的可维修性也不是重点,几乎无法验证。包装可能不含塑料,并且是用大豆油油墨印刷的。然而,包装本身仍使用薄膜保护,智能手机在运输过程中也使用塑料材料。

通信和全球导航卫星系统:OnePlus 13 配备双频 GPS

OnePlus 13 支持最新的 Wi-Fi 7 标准,与 2024 年末的旗舰产品相匹配。但遗憾的是,我们的测量还无法完全使用 Wi-Fi 7。

这主要是因为相应的路由器(尤其是带有 10 GBit LAN 端口的路由器)还很难买到。不过,使用 6 GHz 频道和我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000,我们仍然可以获得非常高的速度。至少在我们测试的中国市场版本中,OnePlus 13 只能使用 2.4 和 5 GHz 频段建立连接。

如果你想进口它,就不必担心 LTE 频段 20 和 28,因为根据数据表,这两个频率都支持。

除此之外,OnePlus 13 可以访问 4G 和 5G 移动互联网,可用频段数量适中。频率覆盖对于旅行来说并不理想,例如在美国逗留时。在美国 Pixel 9的灵活性要高得多。

Networking
OnePlus 13
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
820 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
791 (min: 705) MBit/s ∼43%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
563 (min: 494) MBit/s ∼30%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1610 (min: 1480) MBit/s ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
859 (min: 401) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
648 (min: 582) MBit/s ∼35%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1581 (min: 1247) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1117 (min: 1031) MBit/s ∼60%
Google Pixel 9
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
955 (min: 739) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
911 (min: 857) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1855 (min: 1826) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1851 (min: 886) MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus 12
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1119 (min: 1086) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1857 (min: 1766) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Wi-Fi 7
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1011 (min: 556) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
989 (min: 565) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1536 (min: 563) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1553 (min: 892) MBit/s ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
725 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
711 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1443 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1387 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼75%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
OnePlus 13 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø820 (704-911)
OnePlus 12 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1117 (1086-1176)
OnePlus 13 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø790 (705-871)
OnePlus 12 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1857 (1766-1917)
楼内定位
楼内定位
户外定位
户外定位

为了评估手机通过卫星定位的准确性,我们让自己骑了一小段自行车,并带上 Garmin Venu 2 作为对比设备。OnePlus 13 的定位是通过双频 GNSS 确定的。我们能够非常迅速地获得卫星定位,GNSS 模块在建筑物内也非常精确。

事实证明,这款高端手机在我们的实际测试路线中非常精确;即使在弯道或改变方向时,我们也只能检测到微小的误差。这意味着 OnePlus 13 也可以毫不犹豫地推荐用于要求苛刻的导航任务。

OnePlus 13 对比 Garmin Venu 2
OnePlus 13 对比 Garmin Venu 2

手机功能和语音质量:不带 eSIM 卡的 OnePlus 旗舰手机全球版

默认拨号器
默认拨号器
电话设置
电话设置

除了 nano SIM 卡之外,OnePlus 13 还支持通过 Wi-Fi (VoWiFi) 和 LTE (VoLTE) 网络通话。如果你要进口这款旗舰手机,必须记住,中国以外的用户不能在系统中集成 eSIM 卡。

这在全球版本中应该不成问题,就像 OnePlus 12 一样。 一加 12.支持双 eSIM 卡,就像 像素 9 Pro可能也不会出现在这里。

手机安装了四个麦克风,用于通话,可将语音清晰、易懂地传输给对方。人工智能噪音抑制功能的效果也令人满意。

摄像头OnePlus 13 使用索尼传感器

与 OnePlus 13 自拍
与 OnePlus 13 自拍

OnePlus 13 的前置摄像头为 3200 万像素,没有像素分档,采用固定对焦。尽管如此,只要图像传感器有足够的光线,自拍效果还是很吸引人的。4K60 视频选项并不是什么特别的功能,但值得肯定。

背面采用了三摄像头,由索尼的 5000 万像素传感器领衔。虽然索尼 LYT-808 的 1/1.4 英寸规格并不大,但在我们的测试照片中,它却以强大的动态范围和良好的锐度而大放异彩。

即使在边缘,模糊程度也很适中。值得注意的是,照片总是处于曝光过度的边缘。OnePlus 13 在弱光环境下会失分。在弱光环境下,照片的模糊程度有点过高,不符合我们的口味。

0,6x
0,6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
3x
3x
6x
6x
10x
10x
120x
120x

OnePlus 13 在超广角照片方面大放异彩。包含微距功能的超广角镜头清晰度高,畸变小,非常吸引人。不过,由于容易出现镜头眩光,应避免在强烈逆光下使用 15 毫米镜头。

该组中的第三个 5000 万像素摄像头负责拍摄无损放大 3 倍的远摄照片,但其质量略低。基于索尼 LYT-600 的潜望镜镜头可在 6 倍变焦范围内捕捉到许多细节,但在更高的变焦水平下,图像会显得模糊和做作。

视频可录制成 8K30 和 4K60,还支持每秒 60 帧的杜比视界。慢动作只能在 1080p 下以 240 帧/秒的速度进行。我们怀念前代产品中的 4K120 选项。 前代产品.

OnePlus 13:相机模式
OnePlus 13:相机模式
快速相机设置
快速相机设置
相机设置
相机设置
主模式
主模式

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angleWide angleLow lightUltra-wide5x Zoom

在受控照明条件下,我们将索尼主摄像头的色彩表现与实际参考色彩进行对比分析。

在 ColorChecker Passport 中,50MP 传感器显示出增亮和过饱和现象,尤其是绿色色调和青色。而 OnePlus 13 在完美光线下的色彩保真度(DeltaE>10)几乎没有出现异常。

ColorChecker
7.9 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 13: 4.83 ∆E min: 1.13 - max: 11.05 ∆E
ColorChecker
27.7 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
50.7 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
51.7 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
27.9 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
36 ∆E
52.3 ∆E
54.7 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 13: 37.47 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 54.66 ∆E

配件和保修:OnePlus 提供 100 W 电源适配器

OnePlus 13:100 瓦超级 VOOC 适配器
OnePlus 13:100 瓦超级 VOOC 适配器

交货包括一个 100 瓦的 SuperVOOC 快速充电电源适配器、一个保护盖、一条数据线或充电线(USB-C 至 USB-C)、一个 SIM 卡针和一份快速入门指南。

出厂时还在屏幕上安装了保护膜。在中国版本的交货范围内,我们的深圳借用贸易公司还为充电器增加了一个欧盟适配器和一个 USB OTG 适配器。

我们的进口设备有 保修保修期为 12 个月。如果需要保修,Trading Shenzhen 可以选择将智能手机寄往德国的送货地址。

输入设备和操作:超声波指纹识别器首次亮相

电容式触摸屏反应迅速,120 Hz 的刷新率使动画显示非常流畅。此外,还支持使用厚度不超过 5 毫米的棉或羊毛等天然纤维手套进行输入。

不过,在我们的测试中,较厚的聚酯手套也能正常使用。此外,该公司还进一步开发了名为 RainTouch 的 Aqua Touch 技术,即使在潮湿的环境中也能使用面板。线性电动马达(X 轴)负责振动。这提供了清晰的触觉反馈。

在 2D 模式下,通过使用 3200 万像素摄像头的面部解锁功能,可实现生物识别解锁选项。OLED 显示屏中还集成了指纹传感器。

不过,它的新颖之处在于这是一个基于超声波的过程,能非常可靠、快速地识别我们的手指;OnePlus 称其识别时间为 110 毫秒。定位功能也非常出色。

OnePlus 13:默认键盘
OnePlus 13:默认键盘
OnePlus 13:键盘
OnePlus 13:键盘

显示屏配备杜比视界的 LTPO 2.0 AMOLED 显示屏

OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,每个矩阵由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色 LED 组成。
OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,每个矩阵由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色 LED 组成。

6.82 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏具有 QHD+ 分辨率,因此图像清晰度非常高,超过 500 ppi。LTPO 2.0 面板可根据内容在 1 到 120 Hz 之间自动调节刷新率。

Oneplus 13 的屏幕不仅非常清晰和快速,而且还获得了德国莱茵 TÜV 的高可见度认证和智能护眼 4.0 认证。

在激活环境光传感器的纯白显示屏上,面板亮度接近 1,200 cd/m²,相当高。

在 OnePlus 13 上几乎看不到 OLED 的通常效果,即 APL18 图案中更明显的亮度。我们在这里测得的数值与白色背景下的相同。

在我们的测量中,OnePlus 13 在使用 HDR 视频素材时达到了 1,687 cd/m² 的最大显示亮度,在制造商的 HBM 规格范围之内。至于官方宣传的 4,500 尼特峰值亮度是如何实现的,目前仍不清楚。

1165
cd/m²
1169
cd/m²
1154
cd/m²
1150
cd/m²
1155
cd/m²
1147
cd/m²
1145
cd/m²
1154
cd/m²
1152
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1169 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1154.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.86 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1155 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3
OnePlus 13
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"
Oppo Find X8 Pro
AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy S24+
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"
Google Pixel 9
OLED, 2424x1080, 6.3"
OnePlus 12
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"
Screen
6%
-62%
27%
-31%
Brightness middle
1155
1167
1%
1358
18%
2063
79%
1026
-11%
Brightness
1155
1160
0%
1358
18%
1914
66%
991
-14%
Brightness Distribution
98
98
0%
92
-6%
84
-14%
91
-7%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
0.87
13%
3
-200%
0.7
30%
1.19
-19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.8
1.64
9%
4.4
-144%
2.2
-22%
3.3
-83%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
1.4
12%
2.5
-56%
1.2
25%
2.4
-50%
Gamma
2.3 96%
2.311 95%
1.98 111%
2.23 99%
2.24 98%
CCT
6503 100%
6426 101%
6656 98%
6524 100%
6920 94%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.5

* ... smaller is better

目前,OLED 技术允许通过脉宽调制 (PWM) 和直流调光来控制屏幕亮度。对于 OnePlus 13,我们使用 Rigol 示波器测得屏幕闪烁的直流调光频率为 120 Hz,振幅为 22%。

然而,用示波器测定的 PWM 频率非常高,超过了 4000 赫兹。这意味着面板闪烁造成的健康问题应该是有限的,即使对敏感人群也是如此。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 21.9 %
Secondary Frequency: 4166 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25% 显示屏亮度
25 %
50% 显示亮度
50 %
75% 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)

ColorOS 下的显示屏设置选项并不丰富,但提供的三种色彩配置文件和色温调节选项对大多数用户来说已经足够。

我们使用 Portrait Displays 公司的 Calman Ultimate 分析软件来检查 AMOLED 面板校准中的偏差。

在 "专业 "配置文件中,sRGB 色彩空间受到控制,几乎完全覆盖。由于我们测得的 DeltaE 值非常低,因此无法分辨出各色彩之间的差异。

ColorChecker(配置文件:Pro| Standard,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
ColorChecker(配置文件:Pro| Standard,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:Pro| Standard,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:Pro| Standard,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:专业版| 标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:专业版| 标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度扫描(配置文件:专业版| 标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度扫描(配置文件:专业版| 标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.581 ms rise
↘ 0.545 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.482 ms rise
↘ 2.117 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

OLED 面板的视角稳定性非常吸引人。只有在平视角度下亮度会略有下降。OnePlus 13 在户外也很容易阅读,但显示屏玻璃反光面上的反光会在一定程度上影响可读性。

即使在盛夏条件下,亮度水平也足够,但竞争对手,如 Galaxy S24+ 在我们的实际 APL 测试中要亮得多。

性能:骁龙 8 精英版性能最强

性能上的不足是 OnePlus 13 多年来都不必担心的问题。骁龙 骁龙 8 精英版凭借其 Oryon 性能内核和 4.32 GHz 的峰值主频提供了强大的动力,甚至连 Apple A18 Pro在 Geekbench 多核测试中也显得老态龙钟。

骁龙 8 精英明显优于 Dimensity 9400Find X8 Pro这说明 OnePlus 13 的单核性能很高。然而,高通芯片组在人工智能基准测试中的表现却不尽如人意。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (3001 - 3228, n=5)
3135 Points +2%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3087 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2605 Points -16%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2148 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
2066 Points -33%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1798 Points -42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)
1491 Points -52%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (9202 - 10401, n=5)
9783 Points +4%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9369 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
7480 Points -20%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6630 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
6534 Points -30%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4501 Points -52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)
4177 Points -55%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2173 - 2258, n=4)
2219 Points +1%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2192 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1838 Points -16%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1672 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1567 Points -29%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1423 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points -53%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (6789 - 8816, n=4)
7841 Points +15%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
6789 Points
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6088 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
5871 Points -14%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
5870 Points -14%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
3563 Points -48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points -49%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2534428 - 3015111, n=5)
2789124 Points +1%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2762122 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2374537 Points -14%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2005881 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1777871 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years)
1307393 Points -53%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1022007 Points -63%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (19192 - 27169, n=5)
23421 Points +18%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
19793 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
17534 Points -11%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
15690 Points -21%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
13948 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points -33%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
12314 Points -38%
CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2485 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1718 - 2485, n=4)
2085 Points -16%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1304 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1290 Points -48%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1145 Points -54%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
951 Points -62%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points -63%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (10677 - 12993, n=4)
11410 Points +4%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
10937 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
10697 Points -2%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
10522 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
9467 Points -13%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
6894 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points -41%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (14039 - 17953, n=4)
16044 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
15253 Points +9%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
14531 Points +4%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
14039 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
12891 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points -26%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
7593 Points -46%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (11536 - 18911, n=4)
14954 Points +30%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11536 Points
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
11357 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
10178 Points -12%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
9432 Points -18%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
8573 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points -39%
Graphics
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
56004 Points +28%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
43637 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (35527 - 44189, n=4)
40485 Points -7%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
38959 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
25796 Points -41%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
20938 Points -52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points -59%
Web
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2091 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1998 Points -4%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1923 Points -8%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1907 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1202 - 2363, n=4)
1845 Points -12%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1648 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points -25%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
75143 Points +230%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
35227 Points +55%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
22767 Points
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
18127 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8865 - 22767, n=4)
17230 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
11342 Points -50%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1790 - 307528, n=5)
63034 Points +3080%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
51509 Points +2499%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points +1177%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1982 Points
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1473 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1121 Points -43%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
871 Points -56%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1368 Points +412%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 4619, n=42, last 2 years)
784 Points +194%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
771 Points +189%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
488 Points +83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (267 - 754, n=3)
471 Points +76%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
267 Points
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
9283 Points +3325%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4666 Points +1622%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 32432, n=42, last 2 years)
3765 Points +1289%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
487 Points +80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (271 - 755, n=3)
452 Points +67%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
271 Points
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
12709 Points +1883%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
6451 Points +906%
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=42, last 2 years)
5410 Points +744%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1128 Points +76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (641 - 1765, n=3)
1067 Points +66%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
641 Points
AI Benchmark
Score V5
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
3219 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (66.3 - 3219, n=25, last 2 years)
1229 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (137 - 287, n=2)
212 Points
Score V6
Average of class Smartphone
  (213 - 9873, n=16, last 2 years)
2231 Points +204%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
734 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (302 - 991, n=4)
699 Points -5%

图形计算由集成的 Adreno 830在基准测试中也表现出色。特别是在要求苛刻的 GFXBench 层级测试中,OnePlus 13 与 Immortalis G925.

其分数本身有时高于高通公司的参考编号,这一点很有意思。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6789 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5383 Points -21%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4331 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4235 Points -38%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2601 Points -62%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6754 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6303 Points -7%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4444 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4256 Points -37%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2567 Points -62%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25785 Points
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17681 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13098 Points -49%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8998 Points -65%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11821 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9461 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8774 Points -26%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8237 Points -30%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11879 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9553 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8765 Points -26%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8017 Points -33%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2567 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1998 Points -22%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1598 Points -38%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1023 Points -60%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2599 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2054 Points -21%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1667 Points -36%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1083 Points -58%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +98%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
768 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
744 fps -3%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
539 fps -30%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
419 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
378 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +98%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps +7%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
502 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
469 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
310 fps -38%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
294 fps -41%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
257 fps -49%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +98%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
365 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
341 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
244 fps -33%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
231 fps -37%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
167 fps -54%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +25%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps +13%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
172 fps -20%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
147 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
139 fps -35%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80 fps -63%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps +13%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps +10%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98 fps -15%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75 fps -35%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -65%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps +67%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps +38%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
321 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps -23%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
188 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
176 fps -45%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps -66%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41 fps -21%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
34 fps -35%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -63%

OnePlus 13 在浏览器测试中取得了优异的成绩,为日常使用提供了非常好的性能。在滚动或访问复杂网站时没有明显的延迟。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
238.78 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (89.7 - 289, n=6)
222 Points -7%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
215.998 Points -10%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
215.5 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
139.087 Points -42%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points -48%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
107.467 Points -55%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (342 - 393, n=3)
372 runs/min
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
289 runs/min
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
269 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
260 runs/min
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
185 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
31.6 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (23.5 - 34, n=5)
27.8 runs/min -12%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
16.3 runs/min -48%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
14.9 runs/min -53%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
14.9 runs/min -53%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=66, last 2 years)
11.9 runs/min -62%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
235 Points
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
212 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (168 - 235, n=4)
201 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
176 Points -25%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
147 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points -50%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
103 Points -56%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
92054 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (72825 - 94399, n=5)
86085 Points -6%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
68223 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
63452 Points -31%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
60987 Points -34%
Google Pixel 9
56737 Points -38%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points -58%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -252%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
744.57 ms * -72%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
630.8 ms * -46%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
625.4 ms * -45%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
624.1 ms * -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (422 - 574, n=5)
464 ms * -7%
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
432.7 ms *

* ... smaller is better

在速度方面,UFS 4.0 内存提供了强劲的性能。无论是读取还是写入磁盘,OnePlus 13 的数值都达到了绝对的高端水平。不过,在处理较小的数据块时,仍有一定的提升空间。

OnePlus 13Oppo Find X8 ProSamsung Galaxy S24+Google Pixel 9OnePlus 12Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
-29%
-50%
27%
9%
-33%
Sequential Read 256KB
3984.23
3482.9
-13%
2450.9
-38%
1584.56
-60%
3297.57
-17%
Sequential Write 256KB
3684.36
3498.5
-5%
1523.87
-59%
256.48
-93%
3246.21
-12%
3001 ?(1524 - 3889, n=36)
-19%
Random Read 4KB
301.29
375.7
25%
387.42
29%
226.41
-25%
438.5
46%
Random Write 4KB
344.63
100.4
-71%
176.19
-49%
266.19
-23%
652.8
89%

游戏:OnePlus 13 是游戏玩家的不二之选

骁龙 8 骁龙 8 精英版拥有强大的性能,但这在游戏中是否也能发挥作用呢?我们使用GameBench应用程序。

OnePlus 宣称其旗舰机采用了自主研发的 Tidal 引擎,该引擎可确保高分辨率场景下的高帧率。现代游戏,如《PUBG Mobile》,可以 120 帧/秒的低细节运行。但是,最高细节级别(UHD)只能以 "强制 "40 帧/秒的速度运行。

我们的第二款游戏是要求苛刻的《源氏冲击》,在最高图形设置下可以非常稳定地以 60 fps 显示。虽然在长时间的游戏过程中,废热可能会导致帧速率下降,但几乎不存在掉帧现象(参见 "排放 "部分)。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
源泉冲击
源泉冲击
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
OnePlus 13; Genshin Impact: Ø60.2 (56-61)
OnePlus 13; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø119.1 (103-121)
OnePlus 13; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.9 (57-61)
OnePlus 13; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø38.8 (33-42)

排放:旗舰杀手保持冷静

温度

OnePlus 13 采用了公司自己的第二代天宫冷却系统,由不锈钢真空室和双层 2K 石墨组成。

与性能强劲的 骁龙 8 精英版热量排放相当有限--我们在负载情况下测得的温度仅为46 °C。

不过,在 3DMark 的 "野外生存压力 "测试中,情况就变得有趣了。在这项测试中,发热导致系统性能下降约 50%。因此,在长时间负载阶段(如要求苛刻的游戏),日常使用中的性能下降并非不可能。

Max. Load
 42.9 °C43.5 °C42.2 °C 
 43.5 °C44.3 °C41.4 °C 
 43.7 °C42.8 °C41.8 °C 
Maximum: 44.3 °C
Average: 42.9 °C
38.6 °C40.7 °C40.4 °C
39.4 °C45.2 °C46.1 °C
37.4 °C41.8 °C45.6 °C
Maximum: 46.1 °C
Average: 41.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27.9 °C | Room Temperature 20.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92.3 % +66%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.1 % +47%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78.3 % +41%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.5 % +23%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.7 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.5 % +60%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.4 % +60%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71.3 % +40%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 % +14%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.5 % +24%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.5 % +15%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48.1 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.1 % +74%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.5 % +55%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 % +20%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.7 %
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
OnePlus 13 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.1 (19.9-39)
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.1 (22.9-28.2)
OnePlus 13 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø92.1 (73.8-132.4)
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø84 (79.2-101.1)
OnePlus 13 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø28.1 (19-39.4)
OnePlus 13 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø14.1 (9.52-18.8)
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø11.3 (11-12.5)
OnePlus 13 热量排放:正面
OnePlus 13 热量排放:正面
OnePlus 13 热量排放:后部
OnePlus 13 热量排放:后部

扬声器

OnePlus 13 采用双扬声器系统,播放质量非常好。正如我们的粉红噪声测量结果所证实的那样,即使是低音,虽然不是很突出,但也很容易感知。

中频也呈现出线性的频率曲线,只有极高频会明显下降。

如果您喜欢使用外部设备输出声音,可以使用有线 USB-C 端口或无线蓝牙 5.4,但编解码器选择有限。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.436.12533.832.13117.838.24021.236.15030.438.86324.338.28015.343.810016.843.312514.148.116013.456.820013.157.525013.558.531513.46040011.763.650011.370.963010.371.380010.473.1100012.777.8125011.677160012.778.7200013.879.7250014.380.7315013.782.3400012.683.9500013.480630013.378.7800013.381.51000013.580.41250013.671.8160001464.1SPL25.191.8N0.691.6median 13.4median 77Delta0.78.445.943.940.635.334.832.134.433.837.835.527.728.118.431.421.241.924.44823.653.622.458.819.562.219.866.414.464.812.86914.275.613.173.212.473.110.773.810.875.210.576.511.278.611.779.512.270.811.970.712.177.412.277.212.177.911.859.411.454.12587.80.776.1median 12.2median 73.12.67.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 13Oppo Find X8 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 13 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Oppo Find X8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源消耗:无线充电和出色的电池寿命

耗电量

在Honor 推出经典的锂离子电池之后 Magic6 Pro之后,Oppo 也开始在其旗舰智能手机中使用硅碳电池。这将为 OnePlus 13 带来非常出色的续航时间,这与 Find X8 Pro 显示。

6,000 mAh 电池通过 USB-C 接口最大充电功率为 100 W,无线充电功率为 50 W。MagSafe 和 Oppo Mag 兼容性是 OnePlus 旗舰机型的新特性;配套的 Oppo AIRVOOC 无线充电器价格约为 60 欧元。在测试中,我们使用附带的电源适配器只用了不到 40 分钟就为 OnePlus 13 充满了电。

骁龙 骁龙 8 精英版的功耗在负载情况下并不明显。不过,当 OnePlus 13 处于闲置状态时,近 2 W 的功耗仍有节能空间。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.28 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.86 / 1.74 / 1.85 Watt
Load midlight 10.69 / 11.92 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 13
6000 mAh
Oppo Find X8 Pro
5910 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24+
4900 mAh
Google Pixel 9
4700 mAh
OnePlus 12
5400 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
36%
30%
6%
7%
10%
16%
Idle Minimum *
0.86
0.6
30%
0.43
50%
0.66
23%
1.3
-51%
0.75 ?(0.5 - 0.99, n=5)
13%
Idle Average *
1.74
0.8
54%
0.84
52%
1.49
14%
0.95
45%
1.378 ?(0.9 - 2.06, n=5)
21%
Idle Maximum *
1.85
0.9
51%
0.95
49%
1.78
4%
1.12
39%
1.464 ?(1.1 - 2.1, n=5)
21%
Load Average *
10.69
6.8
36%
6.76
37%
7.44
30%
10.55
1%
9.46 ?(6.7 - 13, n=5)
12%
Load Maximum *
11.92
10.9
9%
16.42
-38%
16.64
-40%
11.72
2%
13.7 ?(9.3 - 19.2, n=5)
-15%

* ... smaller is better

Leistungsaufnahme: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
OnePlus 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.08 (0.705-11.9)
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.9 (0.652-11.1)
OnePlus 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.621 (0.576-0.765)
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.685 (0.559-0.896)

Leistungsaufnahme: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
OnePlus 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.3 (8.53-11.9)
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.6 (10.5-10.8)
OnePlus 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.621 (0.576-0.765)
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.685 (0.559-0.896)

电池寿命

大容量电池使 OnePlus 13 在我们的实际电池测试中取得了出色的续航时间,该测试是在将显示屏亮度调整为 150 cd/m² 和 QHD+ 分辨率的条件下进行的。

在关闭 Wi-Fi 模块的情况下,Wi-Fi 测试时间超过 22 小时,连续视频播放时间接近 39 小时,大多数用户在日常使用中应该可以达到两天或更长的续航时间。

值得注意的是,空闲值低于视频播放运行时间,因此我们将再次进行空闲电池测试,必要时通过更新进行调整。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
37h 47min
WiFi Websurfing
22h 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
38h 41min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 01min
OnePlus 13
6000 mAh
Oppo Find X8 Pro
5910 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24+
4900 mAh
Google Pixel 9
4700 mAh
OnePlus 12
5400 mAh
Battery Runtime
20%
-25%
-24%
-14%
Reader / Idle
2267
3665
62%
2098
-7%
1965
-13%
H.264
2321
1976
-15%
977
-58%
1820
-22%
WiFi v1.3
1349
1411
5%
1009
-25%
990
-27%
1237
-8%
Load
241
309
28%
232
-4%

Notebookcheck 对 OnePlus 13 的总体印象

OnePlus 13 以相对较低的入门级价格提供了大量高端技术和超长的电池续航时间。

OnePlus 13 - 12/12/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
65 / 69 → 94%
Weight
88%
Battery
93%
Display
92%
Games Performance
38 / 55 → 70%
Application Performance
84 / 85 → 98%
AI Performance
42%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
83 / 90 → 92%
Camera
84%
Average
65%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
96.5%
Repairability
20%
Software Updates
50%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 36.1%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > OnePlus 13 智能手机评测:让电池革命开始吧
Marcus Herbrich, 2024-12-20 (Update: 2024-12-20)