Schenker XMG Focus 17 (E23) in review：配备RTX 4070的游戏笔记本在性能上毫不逊色

Name: SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
Brand: SCHENKER

专注于游戏。

福克斯17希望仅以其核心竞争力来说服人们。而这些读起来相当令人印象深刻：带有32个线程的i9-13900HX，240赫兹的面板，以及RTX 4070承诺在不牺牲细节的情况下，即使在当前的游戏中也有很高的速度。另一方面，我们的审查将显示在哪些方面进行了节约。

Mario Petzold, 👁 Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/18/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Raptor Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Schenker XMG Focus 17 E23游戏笔记本（裸机：NP70SNE-G）专注于基本要素。凭借出色的 i9处理器和可选的RTX 4050, 4060，或 4070有足够的性能用于游戏。该显示器还提供240赫兹和足够的像素量。

然而，没有非凡的额外功能，特殊功能，或最好的设计。与我们上次对XMG Focus 17的审查相比，该机箱已经发生了变化。 XMG Focus 17 (Clevo NP70HK)2021年，所以在这篇文章中可以找到更多关于机箱、构造和设备的详细信息。除了游戏性能外，这款笔记本电脑也相当适中。作为回报，它保持在2000欧元以下（取决于配置），在我们测试的顶级配置中也没有贵多少。

竞争对手如 Medion Erazer Major X20或联想Legion Pro 5走的是类似的路线，使用的是类似的硬件。然而，正如我们的详细测试更新所显示的那样，他们没有像申克的笔记本电脑那样持续保存。

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.4 GHz, 162 W PL2 / Short Burst, 135 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2175 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 531.79, Advanced Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, SK Hynix

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, BOE09F9 NE173QHM-NZ1, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)

Storage

Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8, 1024 GB

Soundcard

Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH - cAVS

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headset, Card Reader: microSD

Networking

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 29.3 x 397 x 265

Battery

73 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: Full-HD-Webcam
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, USB-Stick, Mauspad, Control Center, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.9 kg, Power Supply: 990 g

Price

2381 Euro

Links

SCHENKER homepage
SCHENKER notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.9 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2023	SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.9 kg	29.3 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
88.4 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	26.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
89 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	29 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87.6 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2022	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	27 mm	17.00"	2560x1600
85.4 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	27 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
84.6 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.9 kg	33 mm	17.30"	2560x1440

尺寸比较

Medion Erazer Defender P40 SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Medion Erazer Major X20 DIN A4 ❌

设备 - 从TB4到USB2.0的所有设备

与前代产品相比，在端口方面有许多相似之处，但幸运的是有一些刷新。仍然有一个USB 2.0端口，这对于鼠标或打印机来说应该还是足够的。迷你DP也得到了保留。

简单的USB-C接口已被移到后面，提供高达10Gbit/s的速率，但PD和DP都不支持。雷电4在右边，但不幸的是，不再有USB-A端口。此外，在当前版本中，卡槽已经缩减为microSD，这大大限制了其多功能性。

左边：Kensington锁、USB-A（5Gbit/s）、USB-A（0.5Gbit/s）、麦克风、耳机

后部：USB-C (10 Gbit/s), HDMI, Mini DisplayPort, 电源接口

SD卡阅读器

我们用参考的AV PRO V60 microSD 128 GB卡的测量结果不是很平均，但部分地比竞争对手好一点。这足以让我们在几分钟内复制几千张照片。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)	95.9 MB/s +15%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	86 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	83.5 (74.23^min - 83.48^max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	78 MB/s -7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	72 MB/s -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	69 MB/s -17%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)	120 MB/s +32%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	91 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	90.7 MB/s
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	88 MB/s -3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	85 MB/s -6%

沟通

英特尔AX211的WLAN模块满足了人们的期望。然而，在我们的测量中，典型的平均速率只在6GHz网络中实现，甚至还略微超过了。在5GHz下的轻微弱点很可能是由邻近无线网络的干扰影响造成的，我们在测试中自然无法停用这些网络。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1467 (733^min - 1546^max) MBit/s +58%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1445 (1373^min - 1515^max) MBit/s +55%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1407 (1338^min - 1463^max) MBit/s +51%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=149, last 2 years)	1233 MBit/s +33%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (64 - 1921, n=242)	1231 MBit/s +32%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1173 (839^min - 1366^max) MBit/s +26%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608	936 (898^min - 971^max) MBit/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	930 (678^min - 980^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1734 (1706^min - 1750^max) MBit/s +84%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1707 (1657^min - 1730^max) MBit/s +81%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1627 (1381^min - 1714^max) MBit/s +73%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1438 (767^min - 1513^max) MBit/s +53%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=149, last 2 years)	1394 MBit/s +48%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=242)	1382 MBit/s +47%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608	967 (949^min - 978^max) MBit/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	941 (935^min - 947^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1607 (1517^min - 1690^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1490 (1301^min - 1671^max) MBit/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (648 - 1878, n=69, last 2 years)	1432 MBit/s -11%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (385 - 1851, n=214)	1368 MBit/s -15%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1645 (820^min - 1670^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1585 (1559^min - 1625^max) MBit/s -4%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (700 - 1857, n=213)	1493 MBit/s -9%
Average of class Gaming (853 - 1788, n=69, last 2 years)	1491 MBit/s -9%

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1607 (1517-1690)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1490 (1301-1671)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1617 (820-1670)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1585 (1559-1625)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø930 (678-980)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1174 (839-1366)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø936 (898-971)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø941 (935-947)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1412 (767-1513)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø966 (949-978)

ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23): 20.23 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 28.72 ∆E

维护

相当大的变化，目的是为了 XMG Focus 172021年开始，对内部进行了大量修改。所有的冷却元件现在都是由铜制成的，空气可以向两边排放。用于2.5英寸固态硬盘的过时的SATA端口已经消失了。取而代之的是第二个M.2 NVMe SSD插槽。

正如申克公司所期望的那样，接触这些组件很容易。松开12个相同的螺丝后，可以不费吹灰之力从后部的冷却系统开始拉出底部。内存、固态硬盘、WLAN模块和电池都很容易接近和更换。

显示屏 - XMG游戏笔记本的色彩强烈，对比度小

XMG Focus 17的哑光IPS面板满足了人们对一款坚实但不突出的游戏笔记本的期望。QHD分辨率在17.3英寸的大对角线上发挥了自己的作用，此外，240赫兹的刷新率确保了低延迟，即使在游戏中没有达到帧率。

不太有说服力的是响应时间，它不是最佳的，超过10毫秒，但可以接受。糟糕的黑色水平阻碍了更好的对比度。在房间内照明极少的情况下，在非常黑暗的场景中可以看到灰色的雾气。我们测得的比率为623:1，这里的对比度只略低于Medion的一半。 Medion Erazer Defender P40或 HP Omen 17-ck.屏幕出血现象也很明显。

照度可以更均匀一些，320cd/m²的亮度也可以更高一些。因此，与许多类似价格的机型相比，显示率低于平均水平。


324 cd/m²	322 cd/m²	317 cd/m²
323 cd/m²	349 cd/m²	334 cd/m²
285 cd/m²	317 cd/m²	292 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE09F9 NE173QHM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 349 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 318.1 cd/m² Minimum: 18.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 349 cd/m²
Contrast: 623:1 (Black: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.08 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.08
ΔE Greyscale 1.14 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

	SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) BOE09F9 NE173QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Medion Erazer Major X20 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 BOE0A99, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng BOE BOE09BF, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"	Medion Erazer Defender P40 BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Display		-14%	-15%	-16%	-17%	-16%
Display P3 Coverage	96.6	70.4 -27%	69.4 -28%	69 -29%	67.4 -30%	68.3 -29%
sRGB Coverage	99.9	99.6 0%	98 -2%	99.8 0%	97.6 -2%	98.1 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	84.5	72.6 -14%	70.9 -16%	69.6 -18%	69.6 -18%	69.8 -17%
Response Times		37%	26%	39%	12%	15%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	16.4 ?(7.4, 9)	7 ?(3.2, 3.8) 57%	13.1 ?(6, 7.1) 20%	10.8 ?(5.1, 5.7) 34%	15.6 ?(7.3, 8.3) 5%	14.6 ?(7.1, 7.5) 11%
Response Time Black / White *	10.8 ?(4.6, 6.2)	9.1 ?(4.9, 4.2) 16%	7.3 ?(3.1, 4.2) 32%	6.1 ?(2.5, 3.6) 44%	8.9 ?(3.7, 5.2) 18%	8.7 ?(3.6, 5.1) 19%
PWM Frequency
Screen		21%	-23%	9%	-7%	11%
Brightness middle	349	355.3 2%	374 7%	415 19%	371 6%	364 4%
Brightness	318	340 7%	357 12%	399 25%	350 10%	343 8%
Brightness Distribution	82	91 11%	92 12%	90 10%	90 10%	86 5%
Black Level *	0.56	0.32 43%	0.33 41%	0.43 23%	0.32 43%	0.28 50%
Contrast	623	1110 78%	1133 82%	965 55%	1159 86%	1300 109%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.08	1.13 -5%	2.43 -125%	1.44 -33%	1.74 -61%	1.67 -55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.05	2.78 9%	3.97 -30%	2.33 24%	3.59 -18%	2.78 9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.08	0.32 70%	1.4 -30%	0.89 18%	1.01 6%	1.14 -6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.14	1.4 -23%	3.1 -172%	1.8 -58%	2.8 -146%	1.4 -23%
Gamma	2.41 ^91%	2.24 ^98%	2.191 ^100%	2.132 ^103%	2.19 ^100%	2.091 ^105%
CCT	6687 ^97%	6372 ^102%	6194 ^105%	6327 ^103%	6474 ^100%	6568 ^99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		15% / 16%	-4% / -14%	11% / 8%	-4% / -7%	3% / 6%

* ... smaller is better

色彩还原度非常好。用于游戏和大多数非专业应用的sRGB色彩空间基本上被完全覆盖。甚至DCI-P3也能在很大程度上得到体现。因此，色彩还原度高于平均水平。

在没有事先校准的情况下测得的低颜色偏差是非常显著的。即使确定的最大DeltaE略低于3，也意味着用肉眼无法检测到差异。因此，事后不必对显示器进行调整以获得最佳显示效果。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.6 ms rise
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.4 ms rise
16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

由于只有350cd/m²，户外可视性受到很大影响。在阴暗的地方仍然可以很好地识别颜色。然而，如果有更多的光线落在屏幕上，最多只能充分识别文字。这在阴天也是如此。

从不同的观察方向看，颜色的再现性是意料之中的好。IPS面板没有显示出任何颜色变化，亮度也几乎保持不变，即使是从一个尖锐的角度。

性能--用Focus 17进行稳固的游戏

尤其是强大的 Nvidia Geforce RTX 4070决定了Focus 17 E23的应用可能性。该GPU提供了大量的性能，配以足够的VRAM，适用于目前的标题，大多可以在原生QHD分辨率和几乎所有的细节上播放。这也应该适用于在不久的将来即将推出的游戏。

同时，良好的工作速度得到了保证，这要归功于英特尔酷睿i9-13900HX.复杂的应用程序可以被快速处理。多任务处理甚至在很大程度上不构成问题。然而，在游戏笔记本中，CPU的性能充其量是次要的。

测试条件

在预装的ControlCenter中可以选择四种预定义的性能模式。我们总是使用 "性能模式 "进行测试和基准测试，这确保了最高的风扇速度和对GPU和CPU的最大电源供应。

在 "娱乐模式 "下，这些数值都是最小的弱点。只有CPU的性能在这里略有下降，所以对游戏的明显影响几乎是不可预期的。另一方面，"静音模式 "在很大程度上限制了系统性能，但噪音的发展逐渐消失在背景中，即使它没有完全消失。即使在这种模式下，要求不高的游戏仍然可以玩。其中，Witcher 3 ，在最高设置和全高清情况下达到60帧以上。

省电模式 "完全禁用了专用的图形芯片，根据目前的状况，至少在我们测试的系统上，要达到一半的可接受的电池运行时间，这是必须的。

处理器

共有32个线程和36MB三级缓存以及5.4GHz的最大时钟频率表明了这一点：该英特尔酷睿i9-13900HX是目前最好的移动CPU之一。它最适合用于多任务和计算密集型应用，并使前辈的英特尔酷睿i9-12900HX或 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX落后。

在XMG Focus 17中，CPU在零点几秒的时间内接受高达162 W的功率。至少可以在半分钟内输入135W。不幸的是，冷却系统不能完全应付高热量的发展。在Medion Erazer Major X20中，相同的处理器在最大性能上保持稳定。在Focus 17中，Cinebench R15测试的性能下降了20%以上。然而，惠普的Omen 17-ck2097ng中的i9甚至损失了30%，所以整体行为似乎可以接受。

当我们看 "娱乐模式 "时，该处理器有点超标的事实变得明显。虽然电源从135W降到55W，但风扇在这里也仍然很响。同时，我们没有测量到任何严重的性能下降，特别是在游戏中。这是因为从长远来看，CPU只有在这种功耗下才能充分稳定地运行。因此，电源模式只在短期负载中产生影响。

在安静和节能模式下只给予15W，在短期内给予30W。

更多的测量、比较数据和信息可以在我们的 CPU基准测试列表.

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3815 (3467.41-4465.28)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX: Ø2918 (2861.03-2977.96)

Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4327 (4285.41-4407.71)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2230 (2203.37-2292.39)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø2810 (2649.18-4311.13)

Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø2369 (2270.92-3189.19)

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3311 (3259.45-3569.52)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX	83.3 pt
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	83.2 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	80 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	78.9 pt
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	72.6 pt
Average of class Gaming	68.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	67.3 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	59.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	50.8 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (24270 - 32623, n=22)	28225 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	27788 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	26884 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	26407 Points -2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	22982 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=190, last 2 years)	21784 Points -19%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	20341 Points -24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	18060 (17729.5^min - 18059.9^max) Points -33%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	14152 Points -47%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	2095 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1867 - 2105, n=19)	2044 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2036 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	2006 Points
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	1913 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)	1886 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	1846 Points -8%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	1668 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1557 Points -22%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9152 - 12541, n=20)	10766 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	10484 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	10132 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	10118 Points 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	8667 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=188, last 2 years)	8290 Points -18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	7710 Points -24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	7072 Points -30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5549 Points -45%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	805 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (722 - 810, n=20)	784 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	777 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	771 Points
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	738 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=188, last 2 years)	725 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	717 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	644 Points -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	605 Points -22%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (3913 - 4970, n=21)	4522 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	4465 (3467.41^min - 4465.28^max) Points
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	4407.71 Points -1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	4311 Points -3%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	3570 (3259.45^min - 3569.52^max) Points -20%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=195, last 2 years)	3413 Points -24%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	3189 Points -29%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	2978 (2861.03^min - 2977.96^max) Points -33%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2296 Points -49%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	301 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	297 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	294 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (247 - 304, n=21)	292 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	284 Points
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	278 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=192, last 2 years)	277 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	248 Points -13%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	243 Points -14%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	216 Seconds * -73%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	198 Seconds * -58%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	174 Seconds * -39%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=183, last 2 years)	170.9 Seconds * -37%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	153 Seconds * -22%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	147 Seconds * -18%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	125 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (101 - 153, n=21)	117.9 Seconds * +6%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	113 Seconds * +10%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	113598 MIPS +8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (90675 - 127283, n=20)	111796 MIPS +6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	105324 MIPS
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	94649 MIPS -10%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	86234 MIPS -18%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=187, last 2 years)	85120 MIPS -19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	75557 MIPS -28%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	72220 MIPS -31%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	64439 MIPS -39%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	7244 MIPS +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	6925 MIPS +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	6895 MIPS +2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (6340 - 7177, n=20)	6848 MIPS +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	6747 MIPS
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=187, last 2 years)	6306 MIPS -7%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	6256 MIPS -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5872 MIPS -13%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	5552 MIPS -18%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	20245 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17614 - 21075, n=21)	19809 Points +9%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	19213 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	18109 Points
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	16250 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=188, last 2 years)	14972 Points -17%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	14222 Points -21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	12378 Points -32%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10126 Points -44%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	2079 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	2040 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2033 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1345 - 2093, n=21)	1988 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	1944 Points
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	1923 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=188, last 2 years)	1892 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	1666 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1590 Points -18%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (23.5 - 34.4, n=21)	29.1 fps +4%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	28.9 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	27.9 fps
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	25.6 fps -8%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	25.2 fps -10%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=187, last 2 years)	23.4 fps -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	23.2 fps -17%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	20.8 fps -25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	17.5 fps -37%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	56 s * -10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	50.8 s *
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	49.8 s * +2%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=184, last 2 years)	47.4 s * +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	44.2 s * +13%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (32.8 - 51.1, n=20)	42.5 s * +16%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	42.4 s * +17%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	39 s * +23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	37.9 s * +25%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	0.493 sec * -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	0.4808 sec * -14%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=188, last 2 years)	0.438 sec * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.4234 sec *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	0.421 sec * +1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	0.4194 sec * +1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.375 - 0.4564, n=21)	0.402 sec * +5%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.3922 sec * +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.3862 sec * +9%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

4465 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

253 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

284 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

10132 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

771 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2006 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

26884 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	93.6 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX	93.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	85 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	79.7 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	74.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	68.6 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	60.7 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	29656 KRay/s +38%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	25147 KRay/s +17%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17589 - 27615, n=21)	24097 KRay/s +12%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=184, last 2 years)	21813 KRay/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	21492 KRay/s
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	17589 KRay/s -18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	16115 KRay/s -25%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	15397 KRay/s -28%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	125161 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	120974 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (88686 - 137015, n=21)	120602 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	110631 Points
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=184, last 2 years)	106435 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	98800 Points -11%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	88686 Points -20%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	77807 Points -30%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	6234 MB/s +16%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4362 - 7029, n=21)	6061 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	5395 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4974 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=184, last 2 years)	4884 MB/s -9%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	4362 MB/s -19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3422 MB/s -37%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	3412 MB/s -37%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	134893 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	134514 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	134141 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (125644 - 141385, n=21)	133924 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	126954 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=184, last 2 years)	116781 Points -13%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	113837 Points -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	102167 Points -24%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15887 Points +15%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15349 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (12334 - 17179, n=21)	14889 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13832 Points
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=184, last 2 years)	13235 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	12783 Points -8%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	12334 Points -11%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	10407 Points -25%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	64255 Points +20%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	62932 Points +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (43850 - 69202, n=21)	59821 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	54060 Points +1%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=184, last 2 years)	53598 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	53409 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	43850 Points -18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	38311 Points -28%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (89413 - 237881, n=21)	139015 MB/s +35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	135833 MB/s +32%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119757 MB/s +16%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=184, last 2 years)	108960 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	103076 MB/s
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	89413 MB/s -13%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	72510 MB/s -30%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71191 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1804 MB/s +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1284 - 1958, n=21)	1755 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1581 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=184, last 2 years)	1358 MB/s -14%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1284 MB/s -19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1147 MB/s -27%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	981 MB/s -38%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	845 MB/s -47%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15975 KRay/s +38%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13736 KRay/s +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9481 - 15279, n=21)	13066 KRay/s +13%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=184, last 2 years)	11747 KRay/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11608 KRay/s
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	9481 KRay/s -18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	8529 KRay/s -27%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	8145 KRay/s -30%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	50563 MPixel/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	49738 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (42994 - 51994, n=21)	48439 MPixel/s -3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	42994 MPixel/s -14%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=185, last 2 years)	40045 MPixel/s -19%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	36118 MPixel/s -27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	30226 MPixel/s -39%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	28499 MPixel/s -43%

系统性能

许多处理器核心，大量快速访问的内存，以及快速的固态硬盘在各种情况下都能驱动系统。即使是在后台暂停的游戏，也只是减慢了一点速度。从打开视频编辑软件的大量多任务处理到无数的浏览器标签，几乎没有任何事情会导致Focus 17出现严重问题。

虽然它在拥有类似硬件的对手中相对落后，但它还是获得了一个比坚实的评级，承诺为苛刻的任务提供足够的性能。

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8206 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=166, last 2 years)	7789 Points +12%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	7609 Points +9%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	7575 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (6956 - 8153, n=3)	7561 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6966 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	6956 Points
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	6909 Points -1%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	11824 Points +20%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	11653 Points +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11074 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9865 - 11653, n=3)	10940 Points +11%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=165, last 2 years)	10828 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9865 Points
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	9760 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9740 Points -1%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10235 Points +8%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	9976 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=165, last 2 years)	9897 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	9850 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	9760 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9470 - 9850, n=3)	9685 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9564 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9470 Points

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	13229 Points +35%
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=165, last 2 years)	12085 Points +24%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9776 - 13370, n=3)	11141 Points +14%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	10278 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	10135 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9848 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9776 Points
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	9393 Points -4%

CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2029 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2027 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1991 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1842 - 2029, n=3)	1947 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=147, last 2 years)	1905 Points -6%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1842 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1774 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1699 Points -16%

CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1930 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1872 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1828 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=147, last 2 years)	1805 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1700 - 1872, n=3)	1795 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1700 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1646 Points -12%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1643 Points -12%

CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2310 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2239 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2088 - 2316, n=3)	2238 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2222 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=147, last 2 years)	2090 Points -10%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2088 Points -10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1992 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1867 Points -19%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1808 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1785 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1752 Points
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=147, last 2 years)	1704 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1557 - 1752, n=3)	1639 Points -6%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1608 Points -8%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1577 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1405 Points -20%

PCMark 10 Score		6956 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77973 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77068 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (67716 - 78835, n=21)	75033 MB/s -3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67755 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=184, last 2 years)	65173 MB/s -15%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	57466 MB/s -25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	50231 MB/s -35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50007 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	86248 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84677 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (73998 - 88462, n=21)	82199 MB/s -3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73998 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=184, last 2 years)	69015 MB/s -18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	67639 MB/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	51403 MB/s -39%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50703 MB/s -40%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	76988 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	74791 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (65472 - 77045, n=21)	73168 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=184, last 2 years)	66990 MB/s -10%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	65604 MB/s -12%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	57744 MB/s -23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	55263 MB/s -26%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	54587 MB/s -27%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=184, last 2 years)	94 ns * -3%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	93 ns * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	91.1 ns *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	90.8 ns * -0%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	90.6 ns * +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.5 ns * +5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (80.4 - 91.1, n=21)	86.3 ns * +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	84.7 ns * +7%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

具有相同CPU的其他游戏笔记本的性能比XMG Focus 17差很多。它没有达到最佳效果，但在大多数需要顺利进行的任务中，应该可以令人满意地工作。它甚至可以做得更好，但对于大多数用户来说，这应该只是次要的。

最大的困难是由来自Nvidia的显卡驱动引起的，希望将来能通过更新来改善。同样值得称道但绝不是常规的是4K视频的流畅播放没有掉帧。因此，目前的构建和驱动设备似乎是和谐的。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4362 μs * -349%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4343.1 μs * -347%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2103 μs * -117%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1752.1 μs * -80%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	971 μs *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	603 μs * +38%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

安装的M.2固态硬盘Crucial P5 Plus并不是一个高级型号。然而，它通过PCIe 4.0实现了良好的传输速率，并在长期测试中保持非常稳定，这是由于在游戏笔记本电脑的底板上有额外的冷却。

因此，在加载、程序执行等过程中，不会出现大容量存储的阻碍或延迟。

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8

Sequential Read: 3344MB/s

Sequential Write: 4175MB/s

4K Read: 53.4MB/s

4K Write: 177.9MB/s

4K-64 Read: 2205MB/s

4K-64 Write: 2078MB/s

Access Time Read: 0.03ms

Access Time Write: 0.023ms

Score Read: 2593Points

Score Write: 2674Points

Score Total: 6631Points

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	92.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	82.4 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	81.5 pt
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	72.5 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	69.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	68.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	67.1 pt
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	64.6 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4677 (4664.17^min - 4676.56^max) MB/s +33%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3872 (3855.82^min - 3871.97^max) MB/s +10%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3848 (3815.64^min - 3848.21^max) MB/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	3510 (3182.35^min - 3509.69^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=165, last 2 years)	3468 MB/s -1%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (2945 - 3972, n=4)	3456 MB/s -2%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3153 (2810.23^min - 3153.26^max) MB/s -10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2501 (2479.67^min - 2500.68^max) MB/s -29%
seq write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5145 (5060.48^min - 5145.38^max) MB/s +30%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4675 (4517.46^min - 4675.27^max) MB/s +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4326 (4313.21^min - 4326.48^max) MB/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4242 (4225.7^min - 4241.7^max) MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	3961 (3831.8^min - 3960.68^max) MB/s
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (2991 - 4252, n=4)	3864 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=165, last 2 years)	3802 MB/s -4%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2507 MB/s -37%
seq q8 t1 read
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	6966 (5571.08^min - 6965.69^max) MB/s +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6878 (6539.55^min - 6877.94^max) MB/s +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6660 (6017.57^min - 6659.93^max) MB/s +2%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (6520 - 6677, n=4)	6597 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	6520 (5378.57^min - 6520.05^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6384 (5573.36^min - 6384.17^max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=165, last 2 years)	6305 MB/s -3%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	5009 (4674.55^min - 5008.89^max) MB/s -23%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6110 (6082.58^min - 6110.11^max) MB/s +25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5043 (5032.12^min - 5043.21^max) MB/s +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4943 (4926^min - 4942.6^max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4907 (4549.56^min - 4906.75^max) MB/s
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (4562 - 5004, n=4)	4847 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=165, last 2 years)	4841 MB/s -1%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4797 (4359.23^min - 4796.61^max) MB/s -2%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3723 (3590.69^min - 3723.28^max) MB/s -24%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	80.1 (78.57^min - 80.12^max) MB/s +49%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	80 (78.03^min - 80.03^max) MB/s +49%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	79.1 (78.08^min - 79.08^max) MB/s +48%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=165, last 2 years)	65.9 MB/s +23%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (49.8 - 64.8, n=4)	57.9 MB/s +8%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	57.2 (55.31^min - 57.16^max) MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	53.6 (49.65^min - 53.63^max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	51.1 (49.74^min - 51.1^max) MB/s -5%
4k q1 t1 write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	289 (284.65^min - 288.96^max) MB/s +41%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	281 (267.52^min - 281.12^max) MB/s +37%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	275 (272.08^min - 274.75^max) MB/s +34%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	244 (243^min - 243.65^max) MB/s +19%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=165, last 2 years)	223 MB/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	205 (204.35^min - 205.06^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	195.1 (194.02^min - 195.09^max) MB/s -5%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (119.3 - 205, n=4)	181.3 MB/s -12%
4k q32 t16 read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5829 (5404.65^min - 5828.67^max) MB/s +106%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4483 (4465.42^min - 4482.78^max) MB/s +58%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4173 (4166.98^min - 4173.4^max) MB/s +47%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3578 (3566.03^min - 3578.13^max) MB/s +26%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3335 (3324.73^min - 3334.83^max) MB/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2835 (2820.49^min - 2835.3^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=165, last 2 years)	2561 MB/s -10%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (1350 - 2852, n=4)	2250 MB/s -21%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4383 (4358.15^min - 4383.06^max) MB/s +65%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3737 (3683.15^min - 3737.15^max) MB/s +40%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3607 (3566.02^min - 3606.71^max) MB/s +35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3552 (3546.24^min - 3551.63^max) MB/s +33%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3208 (2280.32^min - 3207.74^max) MB/s +20%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2664 (2563.16^min - 2664.44^max) MB/s
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (601 - 2664, n=4)	2145 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=165, last 2 years)	2132 MB/s -20%

AS SSD
Score Total
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	10330 Points +56%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9218 Points +39%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8963 Points +35%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	8541 Points +29%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	7599 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=157, last 2 years)	6736 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	6631 Points
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (5751 - 7213, n=4)	6506 Points -2%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3449 Points +33%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3448 Points +33%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3428 Points +32%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3332 Points +28%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2625 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2593 Points
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=157, last 2 years)	2442 Points -6%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (1890 - 2712, n=4)	2436 Points -6%
Score Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5157 Points +93%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4113 Points +54%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3832 Points +43%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3618 Points +35%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3583 Points +34%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=157, last 2 years)	3109 Points +16%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (2602 - 3145, n=4)	2857 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2674 Points
Seq Read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5861.95 MB/s +75%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5621.18 MB/s +68%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5157 MB/s +54%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=157, last 2 years)	4933 MB/s +48%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	4774.16 MB/s +43%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (3333 - 4887, n=4)	4097 MB/s +23%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3667.76 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	3344 MB/s
Seq Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5242.91 MB/s +26%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4175 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4010.3 MB/s -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3884.67 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=157, last 2 years)	3755 MB/s -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3733 MB/s -11%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (2496 - 4286, n=4)	3398 MB/s -19%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3289.95 MB/s -21%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	73.46 MB/s +38%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	69.95 MB/s +31%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	68.93 MB/s +29%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=157, last 2 years)	65.3 MB/s +22%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	63.89 MB/s +20%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	63.85 MB/s +20%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (49.3 - 59.2, n=4)	55.2 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	53.4 MB/s
4K Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	251.87 MB/s +42%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=157, last 2 years)	212 MB/s +19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	211.54 MB/s +19%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	207.32 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	177.9 MB/s
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	168.39 MB/s -5%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (149.1 - 177.9, n=4)	165.6 MB/s -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	157.01 MB/s -12%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2842.96 MB/s +29%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2813.87 MB/s +28%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2798.41 MB/s +27%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2784.37 MB/s +26%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2205 MB/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2194.79 MB/s 0%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (1358 - 2205, n=4)	1967 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=157, last 2 years)	1877 MB/s -15%
4K-64 Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	4380.62 MB/s +111%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3582.58 MB/s +72%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3219.74 MB/s +55%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3085.54 MB/s +48%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3021.8 MB/s +45%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=157, last 2 years)	2524 MB/s +21%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (2078 - 2608, n=4)	2351 MB/s +13%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2078 MB/s
Access Time Read
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	0.08 ms * -167%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	0.078 ms * -160%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=156, last 2 years)	0.05556 ms * -85%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (0.03 - 0.085, n=4)	0.055 ms * -83%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.041 ms * -37%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.034 ms * -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.031 ms * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	0.03 ms *
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.064 ms * -178%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=157, last 2 years)	0.04807 ms * -109%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	0.033 ms * -43%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.025 ms * -9%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (0.023 - 0.025, n=4)	0.024 ms * -4%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	0.023 ms * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	0.023 ms *
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.018 ms * +22%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8: Ø6476 (5976.04-6589.04)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6087 (3287.84-6658.98)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW: Ø6279 (4891.05-6318.25)

图形卡

只有少数GPU比NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 ，它可以理所当然地将自己归入中上层。它提供4,608个着色器，144个用于Nvidia DLSS的张量核心，以及36个光线追踪核心。这足以满足苛刻的任务和最高细节水平的复杂游戏。只有8GB的VRAM有点紧张。然而，这应该只在连接4K显示器时才会造成问题。在屏幕原生QHD分辨率的个别随机测试中，在目前的游戏中从未占用超过7GB。

在Focus 17 E23中，允许图形芯片最大消耗140W，其中25W从处理器中分流出来作为动态提升。这相当于游戏笔记本中RTX 4070的典型设置。然而，我们进行的合成基准测试与预期有一定差距，因为高功耗无法长期保持。

在3DMark分数以及游戏中，Focus 17总是落后于几乎装备相同的Medion Erazer Major X20 或LenovoLegion Pro 5 ，而CPU则不同。显然，大型i9-13900HX 与相应的冷却要求在图形应用中也是阻碍而不是帮助。除了Legion Pro，华硕ROG Strix G18 ，配备RTX 4070 ，但较小的i7-13650HX ，可以作为一个例子提及，它实现了大约相同的性能率。

此外，性能模式似乎还不成熟。比较Time Spy 基准中的结果，性能和娱乐模式几乎是一样的。即使在我们测试的个别游戏中，测得的FPS的差距也很小。另一方面，静音模式，至少工作起来非常安静，下降得太明显。取得的2943分也是由AMD Radeon 780M ，一个集成图形芯片取得的。

更多的基准和性能数据可以在我们的GPU基准列表中找到。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	92.4 pt
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	87.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	80.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	79.1 pt
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	77.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	76.7 pt
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX	75.9 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	74.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	73.2 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	70.6 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	55111 Points +35%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	44906 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	43823 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)	43810 Points +7%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	42773 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	41090 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	40776 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24229 - 46434, n=63)	40427 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX	40413 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	36470 Points -11%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	186284 Points +43%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX	157410 Points +21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	157190 Points +21%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	147464 Points +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (54238 - 193851, n=27)	146973 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	143583 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	130117 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	129611 Points 0%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	40449 Points +36%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	34439 Points +16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	33120 Points +11%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)	31415 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	30936 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	30809 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	29713 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12242 - 33451, n=67)	29070 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX	28374 Points -5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	27122 Points -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	15982 Points +33%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	13554 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)	13118 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	12684 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	12617 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	12551 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX	12111 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	12048 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (5012 - 13391, n=65)	11605 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	10329 Points -14%

3DMark 11 Performance		33424 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		58621 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		25541 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		12339 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	25 Seconds * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	24 Seconds *
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	22 Seconds * +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18 - 30, n=64)	21.5 Seconds * +10%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)	20.9 Seconds * +13%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	19 Seconds * +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	19 Seconds * +21%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	16 Seconds * +33%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	44 Seconds * -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32 - 181, n=66)	40.3 Seconds * -12%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)	36.5 Seconds * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	36 Seconds *
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	33 Seconds * +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	33 Seconds * +8%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	32 Seconds * +11%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	22 Seconds * +39%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	345 Seconds * -57%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=188, last 2 years)	295 Seconds * -34%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (158 - 440, n=63)	291 Seconds * -32%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	277 Seconds * -26%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	275 Seconds * -25%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	263 Seconds * -20%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	220 Seconds *
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	202 Seconds * +8%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

我们测试的所有游戏都至少达到令人满意的帧率。在当前要求相当高的游戏中，在最高细节水平和QHD分辨率下，其速率仅低于60帧。因此，在相当长的一段时间内，该硬件应该足以应付未来的游戏。当你放弃一些细节并使用全高清分辨率时，大多数游戏都能以100帧或更高的速度播放。

XMG Focus 17在我们选定的具有相同GPU的游戏中，在有对比率的游戏中，排名在我们的对手之间。它也大致与配备RTX 3080 Ti的MSI Titan GT77 持平，后者在去年发布时价格约为两倍。采用前代GPU的游戏笔记本RTX 3070 ，根据型号不同，其性能可以超过10%。

由于CPU在游戏中的压力比许多其他基准测试中要小，所以有点弱的冷却并不那么重要。只有GPU需要耗费大量的热量，而处理器的性能可以节制，不会有明显的帧率损失。因此，XMG笔记本在游戏方面没有表现出任何弱点，尽管在全负荷下多出几个百分点似乎是现实的。

在其他方面，允许GPU消耗的最大可能的140W几乎从未达到。我们能够在压力测试的一个特殊场景中激起一个143W的测量峰值。否则，游戏中的平均功耗为100瓦，这再次远远低于图形芯片即使没有动态提升也应该消耗的115瓦。

一切都表明，冷却系统没有设法足够快地散去废热。Schenker XMG经常表明，笔记本风扇也可以长期处理图形芯片的最大功率消耗--例如见 XMG Neo 16 E23.

Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	95.6 pt
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	91.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.1 pt
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	83.3 pt
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	82.1 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	75.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	74.7 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	74.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	73.3 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	164 (128^min) fps +43%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	129.3 (110^min, 111.14^P1) fps +12%
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)	128.3 fps +12%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	127 (107^min) fps +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	121 (98^min) fps +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119.8 (114^min) fps +4%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119 (100^min) fps +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	117 (106^min) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	115 fps
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	103 (89^min) fps -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99.5 fps -13%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	131.8 (6.21^min, 90.9^P1) fps +12%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	128 (5.76^min, 90.9^P1) fps +9%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	121.1 (13.2^min, 83.3^P1) fps +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119.9 (3.81^min, 76.9^P1) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117.4 (3.41^min, 71.4^P1) fps
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117.2 (6.43^min, 76.9^P1) fps 0%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	113.9 (5.92^min, 76.9^P1) fps -3%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)	113.7 fps -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	108.1 (4.18^min, 76.9^P1) fps -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	104 (6.17^min, 71.4^P1) fps -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	101.8 (18.4^min, 71.4^P1) fps -13%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	145.4 fps +27%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	137.6 fps +20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	122.8 fps +7%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	121.2 fps +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119.9 fps +4%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)	119.8 fps +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	115.6 fps +1%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	115.5 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	114.8 fps
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	100.8 fps -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	94.8 fps -17%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	276 (60.5^min, 196.3^P1) fps +31%
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)	229 fps +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	223 (89^min, 167.8^P1) fps +6%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	219 (67.8^min, 154.6^P1) fps +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	217 (41.5^min, 154.4^P1) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	211 (12.3^min, 156.1^P1) fps
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	209 (45^min, 152.5^P1) fps -1%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	208 (11.2^min, 156.4^P1) fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	201 (41.3^min, 148.1^P1) fps -5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	188.3 (28^min, 137.1^P1) fps -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	163.8 (35.9^min, 125.2^P1) fps -22%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	182 (152.8^min) fps +11%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	170.5 (148.2^min) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	164.5 (133.8^min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	160.5 (140.4^min) fps -2%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	158.8 (136.2^min) fps -3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	155.3 (128.4^min) fps -6%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	154.7 (134.1^min) fps -6%
Average of class Gaming (33.2 - 220, n=187, last 2 years)	150.4 fps -9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	144.3 (117.7^min) fps -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	126.6 (111.8^min) fps -23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	121.4 (106.8^min) fps -26%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	123.8 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	123 fps
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	120.8 fps -2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	119.4 fps -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117.8 fps -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	115 fps -7%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	112.6 fps -8%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	109.3 fps -11%
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years)	107.8 fps -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	83.9 fps -32%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	80.3 fps -35%

Far Cry 5 | Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | F1 22 | Star Wars Jedi Survivor | The Witcher 3

Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	153 (116^min) fps +13%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	144 (105^min) fps +6%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	144 (104^min) fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	136 (101^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=101, last 2 years)	131 fps -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	128 (100^min) fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (92 - 158, n=36)	127.3 fps -6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	126 (96^min) fps -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	124 fps -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	113 (81^min) fps -17%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	124 (92^min) fps +11%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	122 (99^min) fps +9%
Average of class Gaming (71 - 194, n=80, last 2 years)	119.6 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	112 (93^min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	110 (82^min) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (79 - 128, n=33)	108.9 fps -3%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	102 (92^min) fps -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	90 fps -20%

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (37.7 - 116, n=56, last 2 years)	69.6 fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	63.9 (49.7^min) fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	58.1 (37.8^min) fps -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	54.4 (36.7^min) fps -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (30 - 63.9, n=24)	53.4 fps -16%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	102.3 (55.6^min) fps
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	99.4 (40.7^min) fps -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	98.9 (35.5^min) fps -3%
Average of class Gaming (16.7 - 159.7, n=69, last 2 years)	93 fps -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	86 (55^min) fps -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (48 - 110, n=24)	85.4 fps -17%

F1 22
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	97.5 (84^min, 68^P1) fps +25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	91 fps +17%
Average of class Gaming (13 - 144.7, n=96, last 2 years)	84.9 fps +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84.1 (71^min, 59^P1) fps +8%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	83.9 (73^min, 64^P1) fps +8%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	79.8 (65^min, 29^P1) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77.8 (63^min, 59^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (39.2 - 88.7, n=31)	73.8 fps -5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	65.7 (56^min, 49^P1) fps -16%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	67.6 (57^min, 45^P1) fps +38%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	62 fps +27%
Average of class Gaming (29.9 - 92.2, n=76, last 2 years)	61.9 fps +26%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	54.8 (47^min, 45^P1) fps +12%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	53.3 (43^min, 40^P1) fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	49 (39^min, 39^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10.6 - 58.8, n=30)	47.4 fps -3%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	42 fps -14%

Star Wars Jedi Survivor
1920x1080 Epic Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77.9 (17^P0.1, 36.8^P1) fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73 (26^P0.1, 49^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (61.5 - 80.1, n=8)	71.1 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming (27.2 - 148, n=23, last 2 years)	67.5 fps -8%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	61.7 (17^min, 20.5^P0.1, 42.5^P1) fps -15%
2560x1440 Epic Preset
Average of class Gaming (30.4 - 114, n=17, last 2 years)	52.2 fps +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50.4 (18.4^P0.1, 29^P1) fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (39.5 - 51.1, n=8)	45.4 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	45 (22^P0.1, 33^P1) fps
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	38.5 (7.82^min, 11.5^P0.1, 25.2^P1) fps -14%

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	287.8 (248^min) fps +27%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	260 (213^min, 216.3^P1) fps +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	257.3 (239^min) fps +14%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	242.3 (215^min) fps +7%
Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=120, last 2 years)	242 fps +7%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	237 (202^min) fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	236 (30.3^min, 70.5^P0.1, 139.4^P1) fps +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	226 (209^min) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	226 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (123.9 - 268, n=40)	226 fps 0%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	195.9 (174^min) fps -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	171 fps -24%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	164 (128^min) fps +43%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	129.3 (110^min, 111.14^P1) fps +12%
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)	128.3 fps +12%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	127 (107^min) fps +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	121 (98^min) fps +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119.8 (114^min) fps +4%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119 (100^min) fps +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	117 (106^min) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	115 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (69.8 - 133.7, n=56)	112.5 fps -2%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	103 (89^min) fps -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99.5 fps -13%

与Witcher 3 的耐力测试没有任何惊喜。这应该被理解为是完全积极的。无法观察到性能下降或持续节流。典型的波动可以用游戏中一天中的时间变化来解释。相应地，在其他游戏中，随着时间的推移，不应该观察到帧率下降的情况。

在游戏的耐力测试中，我们可以再次检查娱乐和性能模式的表现。在娱乐模式下，系统需要的功率几乎减少了20W，而GPU的时钟频率比性能模式下要高。CPU的行为似乎更有规律，通常时钟速率（绿色）也比性能模式略高。由于功耗更低，噪音发展略低，我们还测量了相同的帧率。

Witcher 3 FPS chart

Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; FPS: Ø123.2 (117-126)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø109.3 (103-115)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø112.3 (106-121)

	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	180.8	117.4	88.5
The Witcher 3 (2015)	226	115
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	177.3	164.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	114.8		81.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	123
Far Cry 5 (2018)	145	136	112
Strange Brigade (2018)	247	211	135.2
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	100.7	102.3	63.9
F1 22 (2022)	211	77.8	49
Hogwarts Legacy (2023)	86	71	50
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023)	79	73	45

排放 - Focus 17可以很安静

噪声排放

Focus 17是其行业中最响亮的代表之一。即使隔着一扇紧闭的门，它也能清楚地听到约58分贝的声音。然而Medion Erazer Defender P40证明了它可以变得更响。尽管图形芯片较小，但它显然达到了60分贝以上。

在远离永久负载的笔记本电脑的正常使用过程中，风扇的转速很显眼。冷却的启动没有明显的原因。几秒钟后，速度再次降低。另一方面，在游戏过程中速度保持不变，所以可以听到永久的噪音，但没有恼人的速度变化。

我们测得在娱乐模式下，Witcher 3 ，少了几个分贝，这是很容易察觉的。顺便说一下，帧数保持不变。在 "静音模式 "下，可以测量到少了15分贝，感觉是原来音量的三分之一。在这种情况下，笔记本是可以听到的，但即使在安静的环境中也不会造成干扰。在Witcher 3 ，我们仍然测得帧率略低于一半。在最高的细节设置下，游戏仍然可以以60帧的速度播放，这可能是许多要求不高或稍旧的游戏的真实情况，然后也可以像耳语一样安静地播放。

Noise Level

Idle		24 / 24 / 26.47 dB(A)
Load		55.72 / 57.94 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
Noise		11%	-3%	-8%	-5%	-7%
off / environment *	24	23.2 3%	24 -0%	26 -8%	24 -0%	25 -4%
Idle Minimum *	24	23.2 3%	25 -4%	26 -8%	31 -29%	26 -8%
Idle Average *	24	23.2 3%	29 -21%	29 -21%	32 -33%	27 -13%
Idle Maximum *	26.47	26.2 1%	31 -17%	40 -51%	33 -25%	32 -21%
Load Average *	55.72	31.4 44%	50 10%	47 16%	45 19%	53 5%
Witcher 3 ultra *	57.94	48.4 16%	53 9%	52 10%	45 22%	56 3%
Load Maximum *	57.94	53.8 7%	57 2%	54 7%	50 14%	64 -10%

* ... smaller is better

温度

掌托是温暖的，但绝不是热的（我们测得的最高温度为36℃）。然而，关键区域的温度已经达到42°C，而中间右侧的温度仍然是40°C。在左边，游戏笔记本保持了一点温度。这可能是令人讨厌的，特别是在打字和游戏的温暖日子里。

即使没有明显的负载，底部也会变热，所以XMG Focus 17 E23应该只在平坦的硬表面上使用。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


38 °C	50 °C	40 °C
36 °C	43 °C	37 °C
27 °C	33 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 50 °C
Average: 37.4 °C


41 °C	56 °C	44 °C
33 °C	41 °C	27 °C
29 °C	21 °C	22 °C

Maximum: 56 °C
Average: 34.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


28 °C	33 °C	32 °C
28 °C	32 °C	35 °C
24 °C	29 °C	37 °C

Maximum: 37 °C
Average: 30.9 °C


33 °C	32 °C	31 °C
36 °C	31 °C	26 °C
27 °C	27 °C	24 °C

Maximum: 36 °C
Average: 29.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 31 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


36 °C	48 °C	41 °C
34 °C	42 °C	40 °C
26 °C	28 °C	36 °C

Maximum: 48 °C
Average: 36.8 °C


41 °C	51 °C	42 °C
35 °C	35 °C	28 °C
26 °C	23 °C	22 °C

Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 33.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).

	SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Heat		20%	4%	9%	23%	19%
Maximum Upper Side *	50	41.8 16%	46 8%	49 2%	41 18%	42 16%
Maximum Bottom *	56	41.4 26%	49 12%	52 7%	51 9%	45 20%
Idle Upper Side *	37	29 22%	37 -0%	30 19%	24 35%	28 24%
Idle Bottom *	36	30.4 16%	38 -6%	33 8%	25 31%	30 17%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在我们用Prime95和Furmark进行的压力测试中，CPU的温度达到了95℃以上。另一方面，GPU没有被完全利用，在60至75℃之间徘徊。在这种极端情况下，电源是有限的，GPU和CPU加起来大约是200W，而240W理论上是可能的。此外，这种情况只持续过几秒钟，然后电源和时钟速率就会明显降低。

冷却系统不能永久地保持最大的性能，例如，在 XMG Neo 16 E23就是这种情况。

演讲者

对于一台笔记本来说，声音的再现是足够强大的。没有什么可抱怨的，特别是在低频和高音部分。语音和重度动作游戏中的典型效果再现良好。

在音乐或甚至电影中，也可以听到缺乏音质和中低频和高低音的声音，这在我们的测量中是很明显的。对于这些任务，几乎没有办法绕过使用外部扬声器或耳机。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.08 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--游戏笔记本的强大CPU是非常饥饿的

消耗功率

在没有进程运行的情况下，耗电量显然太高。特别是那些采用AMD处理器的对手，如 XMG Neo 17 M22则可以用不到一半的功率。

Focus 17在负载下也不节俭。在Witcher 3 ，要达到相同的帧率，它需要比XMG Neo 17 M22多三分之一的功率。联想Legion Pro 5.这并不高效，在很大程度上解释了为什么Legion 的声音只有一半。

280瓦的电源至少是足够大的，从未过载，而且应该总是提供足够的电力为电池充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.05 / 1.5 Watt
Idle	17 / 18 / 25.8 Watt
Load	178 / 275 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"	Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"	MSI Titan GT77 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		17%	31%	5%	31%	-29%	20%	12%
Idle Minimum *	17	8.1 52%	7 59%	16 6%	8 53%	30.21 -78%	12.4 ?(4.3 - 31, n=53) 27%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=154, last 2 years) 21%
Idle Average *	18	15.9 12%	11 39%	20 -11%	12 33%	32.42 -80%	17.5 ?(4.6 - 35.1, n=53) 3%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=154, last 2 years) -5%
Idle Maximum *	25.8	37.2 -44%	17 34%	26 -1%	18 30%	33.7 -31%	24.2 ?(9 - 55.4, n=53) 6%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=154, last 2 years) -3%
Load Average *	178	90.9 49%	92 48%	135 24%	101 43%	125.09 30%	97.6 ?(59.2 - 178, n=53) 45%	106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=153, last 2 years) 40%
Witcher 3 ultra *	265	189.6 28%	221 17%	215 19%	180.8 32%	256 3%
Load Maximum *	275	263.5 4%	306 -11%	299 -9%	284 -3%	321.88 -17%	222 ?(107 - 319, n=53) 19%	249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=154, last 2 years) 9%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø211 (196.76-225.43)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø210 (185.31-274.53)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø18.2 (11.687-25.221)

Power consumption external monitor

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø186.4 (170.42-203.83)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø225 (215.65-233.12)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø173.6 (98.76-221.45)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø220 (212.03-229.87)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø193.2 (188.84-197.63)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø24.3 (13.727-50.006)

电池寿命

无负载时的高耗电量伴随着电池运行时间的减弱。即使在节能模式下，也无法达到4小时。在静音模式下，还能再实现20分钟，考虑到激活的DGPU，这是不可能的。如果在性能模式下拔掉插头，并激活高级优化功能，在我们的WLAN测试中，运行时间甚至不到2小时，而且还能交替进行互联网通话。

XMG在这方面报告说，节能模式目前不能如愿。从我们的测试结果来看，我们可以证实这一点。一个更新肯定会纠正这种情况。

Battery Runtime

Witcher 3 ultra 150cd		1h 02min
WiFi Websurfing		3h 53min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		3h 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		3h 08min

	SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 62.3 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		3%	17%	121%	5%	70%	68%
H.264	188		252 34%	398 112%	220 17%	339 80%	409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years) 118%
WiFi v1.3	233	240 3%	232 0%	537 130%	217 -7%	373 60%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=153, last 2 years) 61%
Witcher 3 ultra	62						78.3 ?(47 - 155, n=16, last 2 years) 26%

Pros

+ 非常强大的处理器

+ 在目前的游戏中表现良好

+ 良好的色彩还原性

+ 240赫兹面板

+ 相对便宜

Cons

- 电池寿命弱

- 负载下的高噪音

- 冷却器有点太弱

- 显示屏对比度低

- 触摸板不是很精确

结论 - 最适合游戏，有一些缺点

该系统的性能是毋庸置疑的。Focus 17在类似的强大竞争中名列前茅。只有不太有说服力的冷却系统阻止了更好的得分。它似乎没有为英特尔酷睿i9进行精确的调整，特别是。然而，目前可能没有任何游戏对色彩准确的QHD分辨率的屏幕要求过高。

专注于游戏性能：在Focus 17 E23中发现了强大的硬件，其设备低于平均水平。

如果笔记本电脑不需要有更多的能力，XMG焦点与专注于游戏性能，这已经在名称中预测。否则，与（几乎普遍更昂贵的）竞争对手相比，评级结果相当弱。

键盘只提供了几种颜色设置，总是针对所有按键。与前代产品一样，触摸板不能令人信服，但无论如何它几乎不会被用于游戏。电池寿命太短，在严格的节能模式下只能接受一半。扬声器的声音很平庸。此外，通风装置的声音比平均水平要大，而组件的耗电量对于确定的性能来说太大。此外，USB2.0似乎不再是最新的，例如，Mini-DisplayPort可以在VR头盔上找到，但支持DP的USB-C会更有变化。

作为回报，定价也相应地具有吸引力。性价比很高。如果Schenker也能成功地通过软件更新调整看似未完成的性能模式，那么一些缺陷，如电池寿命短或风扇行为差，就可以大大缓解。

从类似的组件中可以获得更多的性能，例如，有 XMG Neo 16 E23(配备RTX 4090)。与XMG Focus 17相比，速度差不多，而且更安静的是联想Legion Pro 5 16 Gen8.然而，这两款游戏笔记本在整体设备较好的情况下，价格也明显更高。

价格和可用性

我们测试的Schenker XMG Focus 17 (E23)配备RTX 4070的版本，在Bestware的价格接近2400欧元。配备RTX 4060的变体仍然低于2000欧元，这取决于配置，例如在数码港。

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) - 06/04/2023 v7 ^(old)
Mario Petzold

Chassis

79 / 98 → 81%

Keyboard

83%

Pointing Device

78%

Connectivity

71 / 80 → 89%

Weight

57 / 10-66 → 84%

Battery

54 / 95 → 57%

Display

89%

Games Performance

100%

Application Performance

95%

Temperature

82 / 95 → 86%

Noise

65 / 90 → 72%

Audio

67%

Camera

42 / 85 → 49%

Average

74%

86%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.