Notebookcheck Logo

宏碁Swift X SFX16-52G回顾:平衡效率和性能的笔记本电脑

完整的英特尔包。

由于额外的英特尔Arc A370M图形处理器,宏碁的笔记本承诺在图像和视频编辑方面有明显更好的性能--甚至在游戏方面。即便如此,这些功能似乎也令人印象深刻,并满足了很高的期望。不幸的是,细节上的一些缺陷破坏了整体印象,否则就是好的。
Alder Lake Arc Laptop / Notebook Windows
宏碁Swift X SFX 16配备了英特尔酷睿和英特尔Arc。
宏碁Swift X SFX 16配备了英特尔酷睿和英特尔Arc。

通过Swift X SFX16-52G,宏碁提供了一款面向创意工作的超极本。英特尔Arc A370M显卡和可用的i5-1240Pi7-1260P都是为高效工作而设计的,不一定是为了顶级性能。鉴于1,300欧元的上市价格,这款笔记本似乎是最佳配置,因此,也应该满足要求更高的用户。16:10格式的400万像素显示屏也是对这一点的补充--没有忘记三个视频输出。

竞争对手包括类似设计的多媒体笔记本电脑,其图形性能良好,但并不突出,如联想ThinkBook 16 G4+ ,或实际上华硕ZenBook Flip 15 ,采用相同的GPU。

Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE (Swift X SFX16 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-1240P 12 x 1.2 - 4.4 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 35 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Graphics adapter
Intel Arc A370M - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 2050 MHz, RAM: 14000 MHz, 45 W TDP, GDDR6, 31.0.101.3430
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR5-4800, Quad-Channel
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, AU Optronics AUOBD9E, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, 512 GB 
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headset, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 21.3 x 355 x 243
Battery
56 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: Full-HD
Primary Camera: 2 MPix Acer Camera Front
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Acer Care Center, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.77 kg, Power Supply: 360 g
Price
1300 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86.2 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
i5-1240P, A370M
1.8 kg21.3 mm16.00"2560x1600
80.7 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2022
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
1.8 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1080
89.3 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2022
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1.9 kg20.5 mm16.00"1920x1200
88 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2022
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
i7-12700H, A370M
1.8 kg18.9 mm15.60"2880x1620
82.8 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2.4 kg26 mm15.60"1920x1080
86 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2022
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
2.3 kg26 mm16.10"2560x1440
88.4 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2022
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
1.8 kg16.5 mm16.00"2560x1600

外壳 - Swift X是相当隐蔽的

Swift X看起来很精致,最重要的是,拿在手里很结实。键盘框架和金属显示屏盖确保了良好的印象。然而,对我们来说,顶盖太容易被压住了。底部由塑料制成的事实也是显而易见的。屏幕的边框是一个缺点,因为它的黑色塑料与其他相当优雅的外观完全不匹配。

总的来说,外壳是令人愉快的坚固。即使是单手操作,显示屏的打开也有轻微的阻力,而且很难变形。从90°的打开角度看,屏幕的边缘(也有两个脚)靠在桌子上,这除了是一个稳定的支架外,还为空气供应创造了更好的条件。

最大开启角度为135°。
单手打开是可能的。
屏幕略微抬高了底部,以便更好地散热。

考虑到这些功能和16英寸的屏幕对角线,重量被限制在1.8公斤,这也是由于有一些过多的塑料部件。由于屏幕边缘窄得令人愉快,笔记本电脑的外壳很紧凑,应该很容易装入许多15英寸的笔记本电脑外壳。

从纸面上看,宏碁Swift X是同类产品中最薄的设备之一。这正是我们不得不对其进行多次测量的原因。我们测量的是后部的21.3毫米和前部的20.1毫米,而不是宏碁指定的17.9毫米。宏碁声称的好得多的数值无处可寻。但也许这只是他们网站上的一个数据库错误。

尺寸比较

370 mm 245 mm 26 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 266 mm 26 mm 2.4 kg361.9 mm 255.5 mm 20.5 mm 1.9 kg363 mm 238 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg355 mm 243 mm 21.3 mm 1.8 kg355.2 mm 229 mm 18.9 mm 1.8 kg356 mm 251 mm 16.5 mm 1.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

特点 - 带有TB4的多媒体笔记本,但其他方面不多

Thunderbolt 4 x 2在任何情况下都可能被强调。笔记本电脑可以使用这两个端口进行充电。40Gbit/s的最大传输速率也允许连接到高性能外围设备。此外,还有一个特殊的功能:左边的USB-A端口始终有电源供应。即使在笔记本电脑完全关闭的情况下,该端口也可用于为智能手机充电等。

否则,节俭的风气就会盛行。右边还有一个USB-A接口,以及用于连接电视的HDMI和一个模拟耳机接口,这就是你得到的全部。没有卡槽或LAN端口。

右边的连接:耳机、USB-A(5Gbit/s)、Kensington锁
右边的连接:耳机、USB-A(5Gbit/s)、Kensington锁
左边的连接:2 x Thunderbolt 4, HDMI 2.1, USB-A (5 Gbit/s, always on)
左边的连接:2 x Thunderbolt 4, HDMI 2.1, USB-A (5 Gbit/s, always on)

沟通

可更换的英特尔AX211 WLAN模块的表现符合预期。在测试时,传输率始终保持在一个较高的水平,也可以被评为略高于平均水平。有了足够好的WLAN信号,缺少一个LAN端口几乎不是问题。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1676 (1600min, 1610.44P1 - 1704max) MBit/s +2%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1648 (1435min - 1675max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (709 - 1789, n=77, last 2 years)
1447 MBit/s -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=238)
1379 MBit/s -16%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
MediaTek MT7921
959 (930min - 984max) MBit/s -42%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Realtek RTL8852BE
927 (864min - 955max) MBit/s -44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1630 (1584min, 1584.58P1 - 1678max) MBit/s +9%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1501 (1325min - 1644max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (358 - 1921, n=78, last 2 years)
1359 MBit/s -9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1921, n=238)
1233 MBit/s -18%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
MediaTek MT7921
977 (937min - 1010max) MBit/s -35%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1648 (1435-1675)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø958 (930-984)
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø927 (864-955)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1676 (1600-1704)
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1501 (1325-1644)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø977 (937-1010)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1630 (1584-1678)

网络摄像头

由于全高清分辨率,相对高质量的视频通话是可能的。然而,令人震惊的是不由自主的增亮效果,即使是在照明的轻微变化下。一片云或打开附近的灯,就足以引发令人不快的闪烁。这在我们的颜色对比图上很容易看到。色彩偏差特别明显的领域只是被相机提亮了,因为它实际上是在拍摄体面的照片。

至少麦克风是完全令人信服的。在测试中,它接收到的声音几乎没有失真,几乎不管声音来自哪个方向,也不管笔记本离得多远。

ColorChecker
19.2 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE: 17.8 ∆E min: 2.54 - max: 28.22 ∆E

维护

卸下12颗Torx螺丝后,小心地松开底板就可以了。这是在塑料夹子的帮助下锁定的,但要非常均匀,不要太紧。

电池、M.2 SSD和WLAN模块可以被替换。升级内存就更简单了。除了标准的固态硬盘,还有一个额外的插槽是免费的,再加上相对容易的访问,使得这种升级即使对非专业人士来说也是现实的。另一方面,内存是焊接在主板上的,这就是为什么只有16GB的内存是不可更改的。

铰链和它们的螺丝连接有点太精致了。在其他更昂贵的笔记本电脑中,这个问题以更广泛的方式得到解决,因此也更稳定。

内部出乎意料地容易进入。
内部出乎意料地容易进入。
可以很容易地安装第二个固态硬盘。
可以很容易地安装第二个固态硬盘。
双层风扇只在一侧将热量传导到外面。
双层风扇只在一侧将热量传导到外面。
铰链的连接可以更稳定。
铰链的连接可以更稳定。

输入设备--宏碁笔记本专注于简单性

标准尺寸的Chiclet键盘很容易打字,而且相应的速度也很快。反压力也控制得很好。另一方面,键盘的行程很短,只有1毫米。随着时间的推移,如果你习惯于在大键盘上打字,这可能会变得不舒服。

底下的触摸板尺寸很实用,即使用几个手指也能精确而流畅地操作。另一方面,隐藏在下部区域的按键似乎很僵硬。

键盘和触摸板大得令人愉快,但保持简单。
键盘和触摸板大得令人愉快,但保持简单。
键盘照明有两个亮度级别。
键盘照明有两个亮度级别。

显示屏 - 宏碁Swift X的高分辨率和精确显示

轻微的,但明显的屏幕渗漏
轻微的,但明显的屏幕渗漏

哑光屏幕提供了2,560×1,600像素的连贯分辨率,最适合用于编辑数码照片等方面。另一方面,对于正常的阅读、写作和浏览,应遵守150%的建议放大率。否则,几乎看不到任何东西。16:10的长宽比也是面向媒体设计的。这为典型的16:9镜头上方和下方的按钮留下了空间。

400cd/m²的最大亮度只在显示器的中心达到,但整体画面很明亮,也有一个体面的对比度值。总的来说,图像值几乎完全对应于一个坚实的、绝非杰出的多媒体笔记本所能期望的。

屏幕出血在所有四个角落都是可以感觉到的,但只有在显示内容非常暗、环境也很暗的情况下才会令人讨厌。

356
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
411
cd/m²
375
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics AUOBD9E tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 411 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 363.8 cd/m² Minimum: 18.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 316 cd/m²
Contrast: 1393:1 (Black: 0.295 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.73 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.18
ΔE Greyscale 1.26 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
76.51% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
75.75% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
AU Optronics AUOBD9E, , 2560x1600, 16"
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
CMN N156HCA-EAB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
B160UAN01.K, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Samsung ATNA56AC01-0, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6"
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Lenovo LEN156FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1"
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
LEN160WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display
-40%
4%
20%
-6%
-6%
-5%
Display P3 Coverage
75.75
43.3
-43%
80.1
6%
99.8
32%
69.1
-9%
68.8
-9%
69.6
-8%
sRGB Coverage
100
65
-35%
100
0%
100
0%
99.2
-1%
96.9
-3%
97.5
-2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
76.51
44.8
-41%
80.5
5%
97.5
27%
69.9
-9%
71.1
-7%
71.7
-6%
Response Times
-25%
11%
96%
56%
51%
4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
37 ?(17, 20)
35.6 ?(17.2, 18.4)
4%
27 ?(12, 15)
27%
0.8 ?(0.4, 0.4)
98%
13 ?(6.3, 6.7)
65%
13 ?(6, 7)
65%
32.7 ?(15.7, 17)
12%
Response Time Black / White *
16 ?(6, 10)
24.5 ?(13.8, 10.7)
-53%
17 ?(8, 9)
-6%
1.1 ?(0.5, 0.6)
93%
8.4 ?(4.2, 4.2)
47%
10 ?(5, 5)
37%
16.8 ?(6.4, 10.4)
-5%
PWM Frequency
240.4 ?(100)
Screen
-116%
-79%
-35%
-70%
-76%
-31%
Brightness middle
411
250
-39%
404
-2%
340.1
-17%
338
-18%
297
-28%
371
-10%
Brightness
364
234
-36%
391
7%
344
-5%
329
-10%
283
-22%
357
-2%
Brightness Distribution
81
79
-2%
80
-1%
97
20%
92
14%
91
12%
91
12%
Black Level *
0.295
0.19
36%
0.29
2%
0.27
8%
0.22
25%
0.23
22%
Contrast
1393
1316
-6%
1393
0%
1252
-10%
1350
-3%
1613
16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.73
3.94
-128%
3.9
-125%
2.47
-43%
2.88
-66%
3.25
-88%
2.6
-50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.7
16.73
-520%
8.5
-215%
5.96
-121%
9.35
-246%
6.33
-134%
4.4
-63%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.18
3.09
-162%
1.7
-44%
1.22
-3%
1.11
6%
1.3
-10%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.26
3.6
-186%
5.4
-329%
1.8
-43%
5
-297%
6.97
-453%
3.7
-194%
Gamma
2.35 94%
2.081 106%
2.21 100%
2.2 100%
2.162 102%
2.3 96%
2.32 95%
CCT
6616 98%
6476 100%
6242 104%
6346 102%
7497 87%
6050 107%
7271 89%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-60% / -87%
-21% / -48%
27% / 4%
-7% / -38%
-10% / -43%
-11% / -21%

* ... smaller is better

宏碁宣传Swift X具有100%的sRGB覆盖率,并能兑现这一承诺。另一方面,像AdobeRGB或DCI-P3这样较大的色彩空间并没有完全覆盖。例如,这对专业摄影师来说是不够的。然而,它应该能满足所有其他用户。

100 % sRBG
100 % sRBG
77 % AdobeRGB
77 % AdobeRGB
76% DCI-P3
76% DCI-P3

即使是原始显示器也几乎没有显示任何颜色偏差。测得的最高2.7的DeltaE不能真正用肉眼确定。事实上,校准将这个值降低到2以下。因此,色彩再现等级是非常好的。相应的配置文件可以在显示值的区域下面下载

颜色
颜色
灰度
灰度
饱和度
饱和度
已校准的颜色
已校准的颜色
灰度标定
灰度标定
饱和度校验
饱和度校验

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

屏幕亮度还不错,但仍不足以在阳光下使用笔记本电脑。原因之一是亮度从400cd/m²大幅降低到300cd/m²。在阳光下,仍然可以很好地看到内容。颜色也不会显得苍白或失真。如果你想在户外阴凉的地方工作,你应该不会遇到任何问题。

在Windows设置中可以选择更高的显示亮度,但这是以牺牲电池寿命为代价的,从我们的角度来看,回报甚微。

照片在背光下仍然容易辨认。
照片在背光下仍然容易辨认。
文字也可以在户外阅读,但不能在阳光下直射。
文字也可以在户外阅读,但不能在阳光下直射。

无论选择何种视角,IPS面板既不显示颜色变化,也不显示亮度减弱。然而,考虑到图像技术,你会期待这种情况的出现。

从右上方看时没有失真
从右上方看时没有失真
在一个中心位置进行比较
在一个中心位置进行比较
从左下角看,没有偏离
从左下角看,没有偏离

性能 - 英特尔Arc和i-Core调整得很好

笔记本电脑英特尔酷睿i5-1240P处理器和 英特尔A370M是最先进的。两者的共同点是,它们的特点是效率高而不是性能值特别高。

这样一来,这款笔记本电脑将主要以高速、低耗电的方式处理日常任务。图形性能主要面向图像和视频编辑。游戏也可以玩,但在细节和分辨率方面有严格的限制。

CPU-Z主页
CPU-Z主页
CPU-Z内存
CPU-Z内存
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
 
 

测试条件

如果你在寻找多功能的定制选项,你将会徒劳地寻找。该处理器的功耗在节能模式和电池模式下都没有限制。然而,像往常一样,在没有电源连接的情况下,最大时钟频率会下降,这在一定程度上降低了性能。

我们在 "最佳性能 "设置下进行了所有性能和基准测试。另一方面,电池寿命是以 "最佳能效 "进行测试的。作为一项规则,Windows会自动选择这些设置。

处理器

ǞǞǞ英特尔酷睿i5-1240P拥有12个内核和16个线程,是一款中端处理器。它不保证有过强的计算能力,但在操作上仍然很经济。宏碁Swift X SFX16-52G被设定为在一分钟内消耗35W,如果它需要执行更长的时间。它甚至在几分之一秒的时间内都是64W。在电池模式下也有很大一部分功率。看一下PCMark10就可以看出这一点。这些数值只比连接电源时的最高性能低了不到20%。

总的来说,其性能几乎没有在类似装备的笔记本中脱颖而出。相比之下,联想ThinkPad T16 G1的轻微优势是联想ThinkPad T16 G1的轻微优势,很可能是由独立的显卡造成的。与上一代英特尔处理器相比,性能的飞跃可以在Cinebench循环中清楚地观察到,它反映了纯粹的计算能力,使用的是 i7-1165G7作为例子。

其他基准和性能值可在我们的CPU基准测试列表。

插上电源适配器的PCMark10
插上电源适配器的PCMark10
电池模式下的PCMark10
电池模式下的PCMark10

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

0125250375500625750875100011251250137515001625175018752000212522502375Tooltip
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE Intel Core i5-1240P: Ø1516 (1391.21-1858.82)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 Intel Core i5-1240P: Ø1358 (1263.22-1600.13)
HP Omen 16-c0077ng AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2015 (1981.18-2029.63)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2224 (2142.59-2433.83)
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø774 (689.3-874.78)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H
87.4 pt
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H
85.1 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
84 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
77.2 pt
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P
70.4 pt
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P
66 pt
HP Omen 16-c0077ng -1!
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
66 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
58.2 pt
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
 
54.4 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H
15812 Points +38%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years)
15387 Points +35%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H
14812 (13435.9min - 14812.2max) Points +30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
14686 Points +29%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12173 Points +7%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P
11427 Points
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P
10067 Points -12%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (277 - 11556, n=20)
7949 Points -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
6597 Points -42%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H
1822 Points +14%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H
1809 Points +13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years)
1757 Points +10%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P
1685 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
1681 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
1644 Points +3%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P
1600 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (640 - 1689, n=18)
1436 Points -10%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1415 Points -12%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H
6087 Points +39%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years)
5683 Points +30%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H
5680 Points +30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
5640 Points +29%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4726 Points +8%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P
4365 Points
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P
3780 Points -13%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (763 - 4456, n=16)
3077 Points -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
2953 Points -32%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H
702 Points +11%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H
696 Points +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
653 Points +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years)
652 Points +3%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P
646 Points +2%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P
631 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
579 Points -8%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
551 Points -13%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (251 - 653, n=16)
549 Points -13%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years)
2435 Points +31%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H
2434 (2142.59min - 2433.83max) Points +31%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
2272 (2136.52min - 2272.47max) Points +22%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H
2217 (1970.64min - 2217.05max) Points +19%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2030 (1981.18min - 2029.63max) Points +9%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P
1859 (1391.21min - 1858.82max) Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
1756.34 (1316.01min - 1756.34max) Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
1746.77 (919.1min - 1746.77max) Points -6%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P
1600 (1263.22min - 1600.13max) Points -14%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (407 - 2007, n=19)
1487 Points -20%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H
263 Points +12%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H
260 Points +11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years)
257 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
247 Points +5%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P
243 Points +3%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P
235 Points
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
224 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (91.8 - 243, n=18)
205 Points -13%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (285 - 1926, n=16)
503 Seconds * -62%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
442 Seconds * -42%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P
353 Seconds * -14%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P
311 Seconds *
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years)
253 Seconds * +19%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
251.8 Seconds * +19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
223 Seconds * +28%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H
221 Seconds * +29%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H
218 Seconds * +30%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H
64319 MIPS +44%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H
61169 MIPS +37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)
60265 MIPS +35%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P
44778 MIPS
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
44105 MIPS -2%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P
38202 MIPS -15%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (7254 - 47002, n=16)
33739 MIPS -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
28565 MIPS -36%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)
5722 MIPS +14%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H
5667 MIPS +13%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H
5598 MIPS +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
5451 MIPS +9%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5423 MIPS +8%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P
5149 MIPS +3%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P
5002 MIPS
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
4685 MIPS -6%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (2197 - 5320, n=16)
4528 MIPS -9%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H
12374 Points +22%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H
12166 Points +20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years)
11967 Points +18%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P
10112 Points
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P
9184 Points -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
7962 Points -21%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (1763 - 10112, n=15)
7594 Points -25%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7326 Points -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
7166 Points -29%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years)
1818 Points +10%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H
1770 Points +7%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H
1750 Points +6%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P
1658 Points
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P
1637 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
1624 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
1538 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (672 - 1658, n=15)
1523 Points -8%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1336 Points -19%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H
17.8 fps +42%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H
17.2 fps +38%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)
16.4 fps +31%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
15.5 fps +24%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.2 fps +22%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P
12.5 fps
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P
10 fps -20%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (1.99 - 12.9, n=16)
9.26 fps -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
9.18 fps -27%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
92.3 s * -96%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (46.4 - 120.5, n=16)
58.7 s * -24%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P
56 s * -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years)
49.6 s * -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
48.9 s * -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
47.4 s * -0%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P
47.2 s *
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H
46.5 s * +1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H
46.5 s * +1%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (0.4987 - 1.236, n=16)
0.6 sec * -13%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P
0.533 sec *
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
0.521 sec * +2%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.516 sec * +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H
0.508 sec * +5%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P
0.501 sec * +6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)
0.484 sec * +9%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4601 sec * +14%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4592 sec * +14%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1859 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
129.1 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
235 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4365 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
631 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1600 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11427 Points
Help
Performance Rating
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
91.3 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
87.1 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
86.3 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
77.6 pt
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, A370M
65.5 pt
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, A370M
63.4 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
47.6 pt
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
47.3 pt
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
 
46.7 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
14590 KRay/s +52%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
14432 KRay/s +51%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years)
14429 KRay/s +51%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
13947 KRay/s +46%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, A370M
9570 KRay/s
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, A370M
7607 KRay/s -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
6899 KRay/s -28%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (2405 - 9694, n=16)
6144 KRay/s -36%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
5371 KRay/s -44%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
91947 Points +91%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
73573 Points +53%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years)
72714 Points +51%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
68178 Points +42%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, A370M
48144 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
37208 Points -23%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, A370M
36103 Points -25%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (7407 - 49934, n=16)
30385 Points -37%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
25626 Points -47%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3456 MB/s +49%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years)
3389 MB/s +46%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
3337 MB/s +44%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
3142 MB/s +35%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, A370M
2641 MB/s +14%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, A370M
2323 MB/s
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
1780 MB/s -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1730 MB/s -26%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (415 - 2462, n=16)
1672 MB/s -28%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
101919 Points +60%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
99215 Points +56%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, A370M
95452 Points +50%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years)
90849 Points +43%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
80703 Points +27%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
75330 Points +18%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
75238 Points +18%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (29405 - 76736, n=16)
67563 Points +6%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, A370M
63630 Points
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
11831 Points +88%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
9699 Points +54%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years)
9329 Points +48%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, A370M
8631 Points +37%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
7385 Points +17%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, A370M
6307 Points
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
6212 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
5780 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (2135 - 6540, n=16)
5093 Points -19%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
50615 Points +111%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years)
36169 Points +51%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
34856 Points +45%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
33085 Points +38%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, A370M
23992 Points
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, A370M
21142 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
18076 Points -25%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (5113 - 23992, n=16)
15922 Points -34%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
14997 Points -37%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
124070 MB/s +158%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
110905 MB/s +131%
Average of class Multimedia
  (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years)
75995 MB/s +58%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
70412 MB/s +46%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, A370M
54673 MB/s +14%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, A370M
48102 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
44826 MB/s -7%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (8849 - 90370, n=16)
40001 MB/s -17%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
39132 MB/s -19%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
996 MB/s +23%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, A370M
938 MB/s +16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years)
935 MB/s +15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
919 MB/s +13%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
811 MB/s 0%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, A370M
811 MB/s
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
653 MB/s -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
639 MB/s -21%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (101.6 - 812, n=16)
558 MB/s -31%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Multimedia
  (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years)
7836 KRay/s +53%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
7665 KRay/s +50%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
7398 KRay/s +45%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
7034 KRay/s +38%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, A370M
5111 KRay/s
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, A370M
4461 KRay/s -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
3748 KRay/s -27%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (1154 - 5258, n=16)
3360 KRay/s -34%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3117 KRay/s -39%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, A370M
43661 MPixel/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years)
40459 MPixel/s -7%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
39292 MPixel/s -10%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, A370M
36414 MPixel/s -17%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (11873 - 43661, n=16)
31199 MPixel/s -29%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
27826 MPixel/s -36%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
19911 MPixel/s -54%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
13970 MPixel/s -68%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
13686 MPixel/s -69%

系统性能

从浏览、流媒体或写作等日常任务到雄心勃勃的图片和视频编辑,该系统没有出现任何弱点。由于有足够的核心,该处理器并不回避多任务处理。在复杂的任务中,包括安装过程,Swift X最多会偶尔休息一下。相反,在处理程序时没有明显的延迟。

另一方面,对图形要求较高的任务会使相当小的英特尔A370M图形单元很快达到极限。游戏得分相应地较弱,而内容创作的合成基准,例如媒体编辑,几乎与其他多媒体笔记本持平。然而,作为一项规则,他们使用更快的GPU,这总是负责稍高的评分。在任何情况下,像联想ThinkPad T16 G1这样一个整体坚实的商务笔记本联想ThinkPad T16 G1的处理器可以明显地被超越。

在电池模式下使用笔记本几乎不会导致任何性能损失。然而,尽管采用了相当经济的组件,但在繁重的工作负荷下,电池消耗得相当快。

PCMark 10 / Score
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7150 Points +21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)
6795 Points +15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
6755 Points +15%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
A370M, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6293 Points +7%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
A370M, i5-1240P, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
5898 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
  ()
5898 Points 0%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i5-1240P, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
5703 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5007 Points -15%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
A370M, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10929 Points +9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)
10521 Points +5%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10479 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
10047 Points 0%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
A370M, i5-1240P, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
10039 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
  ()
10039 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9562 Points -5%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i5-1240P, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
9053 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
9522 Points +30%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9231 Points +26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)
8932 Points +22%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i5-1240P, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
8230 Points +13%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
A370M, i5-1240P, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
7315 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
  ()
7315 Points 0%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
A370M, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
7130 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6364 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10257 Points +35%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)
9202 Points +21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8744 Points +15%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
A370M, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
8679 Points +14%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
A370M, i5-1240P, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
7583 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
  ()
7583 Points 0%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i5-1240P, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
6758 Points -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5600 Points -26%
CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK
1793 Points +27%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
A370M, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1718 Points +21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years)
1703 Points +20%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
A370M, i5-1240P, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
1414 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
  ()
1414 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1392 Points -2%
CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK
1709 Points +27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years)
1616 Points +20%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
A370M, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1604 Points +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1400 Points +4%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
A370M, i5-1240P, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
1344 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
  ()
1344 Points 0%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
A370M, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1965 Points +27%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK
1959 Points +26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years)
1909 Points +23%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
A370M, i5-1240P, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
1550 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
  ()
1550 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1426 Points -8%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK
1589 Points +27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years)
1435 Points +15%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
A370M, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1412 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1270 Points +1%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
A370M, i5-1240P, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
1253 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
  ()
1253 Points 0%
PCMark 10 Score
5898 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Multimedia
  (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years)
68580 MB/s +4%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, A370M
65931 MB/s
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, A370M
64424 MB/s -2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
63957 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (23312 - 70537, n=16)
52845 MB/s -20%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
43647 MB/s -34%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
41377 MB/s -37%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
23850 MB/s -64%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
23312 MB/s -65%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
70337 MB/s +10%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, A370M
70132 MB/s +9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years)
69599 MB/s +9%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, A370M
64120 MB/s
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (18989 - 70553, n=16)
55934 MB/s -13%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
47086 MB/s -27%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
46645 MB/s -27%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
24879 MB/s -61%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
24657 MB/s -62%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years)
69752 MB/s +19%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, A370M
58857 MB/s 0%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, A370M
58768 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
58671 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (23454 - 62496, n=16)
52794 MB/s -10%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
46796 MB/s -20%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
41254 MB/s -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
23543 MB/s -60%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
23454 MB/s -60%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (85.1 - 188.3, n=11)
113.4 ns * -6%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
110.2 ns * -3%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, A370M
107.4 ns *
Average of class Multimedia
  (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years)
106.6 ns * +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
94.7 ns * +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
92.4 ns * +14%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
86.6 ns * +19%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, A370M
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

宏碁的笔记本并不真正适合实时的音频和视频处理,尽管与竞争对手相比,刚刚超过1毫秒的时间是体面的。然而,类似的问题也发生在紧随其后的前辈,即Acer Swift X SFX16-51G当在节能计划中选择 "平衡 "时。然后,延迟超出了可接受的范围,无论是哪种方式,都可以感觉到明显的中断。然而,更新BIOS或改变驱动程序可以解决这个问题。

LatencyMon - 主要的 "最佳性能"
LatencyMon - 主要的 "最佳性能"
LatencyMon - 主 "平衡"
LatencyMon - 主 "平衡"
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK
5050.2 μs * -306%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2098 μs * -69%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i5-1240P, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
1873.8 μs * -51%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1542.6 μs * -24%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
1418.9 μs * -14%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
A370M, i5-1240P, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
1243 μs *
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
A370M, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
434.3 μs * +65%

* ... smaller is better

储存

美光公司的M.2固态硬盘具有令人印象深刻的性能。这主要是由于采用了PCIe 4.0标准,这意味着连续传输率非常高。在搜索时间方面也没有什么可抱怨的,所以内存不会对系统性能产生负面影响。

然而,在耐久性测试中,冷却方面的问题变得很明显。因此,即使有较大的写入量,数据率也会明显下降。这种情况在实践中相当罕见,但它表明,硬盘温度高于实现稳定性能的笔记本。这可能会对使用寿命产生负面影响。

Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
Sequential Read: 3200MB/s
Sequential Write: 3430MB/s
4K Read: 63.1MB/s
4K Write: 141.6MB/s
4K-64 Read: 1354MB/s
4K-64 Write: 1802MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.064ms
Access Time Write: 0.026ms
Score Read: 1737Points
Score Write: 2287Points
Score Total: 4936Points
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK
Average Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Drive Performance Rating
Percent
79.5
51
-36%
70
-12%
58.3
-27%
52.1
-34%
74.3
-7%
64.2
-19%
71.1
-11%
75.1
-6%
DiskSpd
-64%
-17%
-39%
-42%
-18%
-31%
-19%
-13%
seq read
2619
756
-71%
3645
39%
2216
-15%
2168
-17%
2746
5%
2124
-19%
seq write
3900
830
-79%
2809
-28%
2029
-48%
1607
-59%
2786
-29%
2677
-31%
3303 ?(2638 - 3933, n=9)
-15%
seq q8 t1 read
6439
1023
-84%
6524
1%
3554
-45%
2660
-59%
3503
-46%
3377
-48%
seq q8 t1 write
3911
934
-76%
4812
23%
2969
-24%
1671
-57%
3016
-23%
3241
-17%
4k q1 t1 read
65.3
18.6
-72%
68.2
4%
62.7
-4%
72.3
11%
48.8
-25%
61.2
-6%
53.9 ?(39.8 - 67.2, n=9)
-17%
4k q1 t1 write
208
221
6%
134.8
-35%
138.2
-34%
194.3
-7%
144
-31%
187.8
-10%
155.8 ?(121.2 - 260, n=9)
-25%
4k q32 t16 read
1522
416
-73%
683
-55%
628
-59%
474
-69%
1798
18%
923
-39%
1017 ?(487 - 1522, n=9)
-33%
4k q32 t16 write
2390
923
-61%
293
-88%
405
-83%
609
-75%
2142
-10%
501
-79%
1218 ?(333 - 2600, n=9)
-49%
AS SSD
-47%
-1%
-27%
-24%
5%
-32%
-5%
-5%
Score Total
4936
4707
-5%
4630
-6%
4202
-15%
2702
-45%
5866
19%
4750
-4%
Score Read
1737
1763
1%
1112
-36%
1221
-30%
760
-56%
2363
36%
1296
-25%
1549 ?(1126 - 1898, n=9)
-11%
Score Write
2287
2024
-11%
3010
32%
2393
5%
1584
-31%
2325
2%
2826
24%
Seq Read
3200
3123.89
-2%
3225
1%
2906.11
-9%
2432.02
-24%
3148
-2%
2825
-12%
Seq Write
3430
3008.29
-12%
1567
-54%
1889.69
-45%
1229.14
-64%
2565
-25%
1852
-46%
2705 ?(1955 - 3592, n=9)
-21%
4K Read
63.1
89.47
42%
69.7
10%
57.61
-9%
75.66
20%
52.1
-17%
58.44
-7%
4K Write
141.6
277.46
96%
170.9
21%
135.2
-5%
242.19
71%
136.8
-3%
227.47
61%
162.9 ?(108.8 - 226, n=9)
15%
4K-64 Read
1354
1360.83
1%
720
-47%
872.52
-36%
441.63
-67%
1996
47%
954.65
-29%
1066 ?(656 - 1365, n=9)
-21%
4K-64 Write
1802
1446.04
-20%
2682
49%
2069.03
15%
1218.61
-32%
1931
7%
2413.44
34%
Access Time Read *
0.064
0.106
-66%
0.059
8%
0.035
45%
0.073
-14%
0.066
-3%
0.026
59%
Access Time Write *
0.026
0.168
-546%
0.024
8%
0.082
-215%
0.033
-27%
0.027
-4%
0.131
-404%
0.042 ?(0.019 - 0.074, n=9)
-62%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-49% / -53%
-10% / -8%
-31% / -32%
-33% / -32%
-7% / -5%
-27% / -31%
-12% / -11%
-8% / -8%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

03256509751300162519502275260029253250357539004225455048755200552558506175Tooltip
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB: Ø2910 (1600.7-6452.63)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK: Ø1029 (914-1032.01)
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N: Ø3546 (3291.19-3556.77)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK: Ø3344 (3131.71-3361.3)

图形卡

这款英特尔A370M,在2022年春季才发布,使用了Iris Xe图形的计算单元。总共有8个核心和8个光线追踪单元。考虑到低性能,4GB的视频内存是很慷慨的。该卡的最大功率为45瓦。随着时间的推移,该值首先减少到35瓦,最后减少到25瓦。因此,该电源最多是通常授予游戏显卡的一半。

因此,它很难与竞争对手的简单移动GPU相比。这两款AMD Radeon RX 6500MNvidiaGeForce RTX 3050都明显更胜一筹。即使是 Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G与老旧的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 2050和35W的TGP也更快,特别是在玩游戏的时候。

相反,A370M的性能显然可以超过GeForce MX型号,例如。对于像宏碁Swift X SFX16这样的多媒体笔记本电脑,它是一个简陋但足够强大的选择。效率在这里是最重要的。我们在3DMark、Blender和其他测试中的结果都相应地很弱。Swift X总是处于性能的底部,但仍然明显领先于没有独立GPU的笔记本。在Blender中,英特尔Arc的表现也比过去两年的多媒体笔记本电脑的平均水平要好。

进一步的基准测试和性能值可以在我们的GPU基准测试列表中找到.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
100 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
70.5 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
58.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-12700H
46.4 pt
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-1240P
38.5 pt
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-12700H
36.3 pt
Average Intel Arc A370M
 
36 pt
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i5-1240P
34.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P
13.3 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
31859 Points +171%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
20869 Points +78%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=77, last 2 years)
20075 Points +71%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-12700H
14954 Points +27%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-12700H
12322 Points +5%
Average Intel Arc A370M
  (11748 - 12338, n=4)
12066 Points +3%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-1240P
11830 Points +1%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i5-1240P
11748 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P
4668 Points -60%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
127549 Points +258%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
102432 Points +188%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-12700H
63026 Points +77%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14679 - 130614, n=38, last 2 years)
56887 Points +60%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-1240P
53782 Points +51%
Average Intel Arc A370M
  (33721 - 39098, n=3)
36141 Points +2%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i5-1240P
35604 Points
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-12700H
33721 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P
17579 Points -51%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
24460 Points +200%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
15611 Points +92%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=80, last 2 years)
14437 Points +77%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-12700H
10345 Points +27%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-1240P
8755 Points +7%
Average Intel Arc A370M
  (8015 - 8307, n=3)
8157 Points 0%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i5-1240P
8149 Points
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-12700H
8015 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P
3036 Points -63%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8207 Points +159%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
5946 Points +88%
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=81, last 2 years)
5446 Points +72%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-12700H
3885 Points +23%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-12700H
3868 Points +22%
Average Intel Arc A370M
  (3167 - 3899, n=3)
3650 Points +15%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-1240P
3184 Points +1%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i5-1240P
3167 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P
1025 Points -68%
3DMark 11 Performance
12308 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
27250 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7717 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3505 points
Help
Blender - v3.3 Classroom CPU
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P
867 Seconds * -57%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i5-1240P
552 Seconds *
Average of class Multimedia
  (189 - 946, n=84, last 2 years)
430 Seconds * +22%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-12700H
413 Seconds * +25%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
385 Seconds * +30%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

一般来说,也可以用宏碁Swift X相对较低的性能进行游戏。从2015年仍然要求很高的Witcher 3 ,到相当新的《网格传奇》,都有设置可以提供可玩的帧率。可以实现中等细节和全高清分辨率。

然而,即使是GeForce RTX 2050在几乎所有基准测试中都领先于这里使用的英特尔A370M。由于这是相当新的东西,在更多当前的游戏标题下,基准的差距明显减少。2018年的《奇异旅团》有时可以比用RTX 2050玩得更流畅。对于《网格传奇》,两块显卡都处于差不多的水平。游戏越老,因此它们背后的技术也越老,英特尔Arc处理这些游戏就越麻烦。

仍然可以观察到英特尔Arc驱动程序的一些问题。在这种情况下,《GTA V》出现了崩溃。在设备的最低质量设置下,《FIFA 23》的帧率反复明显下降。另一方面,高设置带来了相对愉快的游戏体验。一般来说,较新的作品会出现并发症,但通常只在某些设置下出现。持续更新到最新的驱动版本是明智之举。

相比之下,像联想IdeaPad Gaming 3这样的入门级游戏笔记本几乎可以稳定地产生每秒两倍的帧数。

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
135 fps +200%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
110 (94min) fps +144%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years)
100.8 fps +124%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
77 fps +71%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
56.4 (45min) fps +25%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M
55.9 (50min) fps +24%
Average Intel Arc A370M
  (45 - 55.9, n=3)
51.3 fps +14%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
45 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
15.7 (6.06min, 7.83P0.1, 8.73P1) fps -65%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
84 fps +236%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
58.5 (49min) fps +134%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)
54 fps +116%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
38.3 (35min, 36P1) fps +53%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
32.7 (26min) fps +31%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M
25.8 (23min) fps +3%
Average Intel Arc A370M
  (25 - 26.3, n=3)
25.7 fps +3%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
25 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
8.36 (6min, 7P1) fps -67%
GTA V - 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
146 (4.16min, 83.3P1) fps +260%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
130.6 (5.49min, 83.3P1) fps +222%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
108.1 (28.6min, 66.7P1) fps +167%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.9 - 186.1, n=81, last 2 years)
96.7 fps +139%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
79.3 (10.4min, 40P1) fps +96%
Average Intel Arc A370M
  (40.5 - 41.4, n=3)
40.9 fps +1%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M
40.7 (2.41min, 27.8P1) fps 0%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
40.5 (3.62min, 27.8P1) fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
9.54 (4.82min, 7.19P1) fps -76%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
140 (123.8min) fps +125%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
115.7 (100.4min) fps +86%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
113.8 (102.7min) fps +83%
Average of class Multimedia
  (28 - 196.9, n=82, last 2 years)
103.8 fps +67%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
97.9 (75.4min) fps +57%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M
72.8 (45.5min) fps +17%
Average Intel Arc A370M
  (62.2 - 72.8, n=3)
67.8 fps +9%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
62.2 (45.3min) fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
35.2 (31.9min) fps -43%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
129.6 (111.2min) fps +125%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
107.8 (97.3min) fps +87%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
105.6 (88.2min) fps +83%
Average of class Multimedia
  (26.3 - 179.9, n=82, last 2 years)
96.4 fps +67%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
90.2 (75.4min) fps +56%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M
68.3 (45.3min) fps +18%
Average Intel Arc A370M
  (57.7 - 68.3, n=3)
64.1 fps +11%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
57.7 (43.4min) fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
32.7 (29.2min) fps -43%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
81.5 fps +137%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.75 - 162.4, n=78, last 2 years)
66.5 fps +93%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
61 fps +77%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
45.8 (19min) fps +33%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M
38.4 fps +12%
Average Intel Arc A370M
  (34.4 - 38.4, n=3)
36.9 fps +7%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
34.4 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
13.5 fps -61%
1920x1080 High Quality
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
77.8 fps +297%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
58.8 fps +200%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.53 - 141.8, n=81, last 2 years)
50.9 fps +160%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
41.8 fps +113%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
33.3 (16min) fps +70%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M
26.7 fps +36%
Average Intel Arc A370M
  (19.6 - 26.7, n=3)
24.2 fps +23%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
19.6 fps
X-Plane 11.11
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
106.4 fps +288%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
98.1 fps +258%
Average of class Multimedia
  (25.6 - 177.4, n=80, last 2 years)
81.6 fps +198%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
78.9 fps +188%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M
34.2 fps +25%
Average Intel Arc A370M
  (27.4 - 34.2, n=3)
29.8 fps +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
29.1 fps +6%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
27.4 fps
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
90.1 fps +277%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
81.1 fps +239%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 141.1, n=82, last 2 years)
66.8 fps +179%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
60.2 fps +152%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
45.3 fps +90%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M
29.9 fps +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
26.5 fps +11%
Average Intel Arc A370M
  (23.9 - 29.9, n=3)
25.9 fps +8%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
23.9 fps
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
96 (73min) fps +129%
Average of class Multimedia
  (17 - 145, n=58, last 2 years)
68.6 fps +63%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
60 fps +43%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
49 (43min) fps +17%
Average Intel Arc A370M
  (42 - 43, n=2)
42.5 fps +1%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
42 (39min) fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
13 fps -69%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
103 (82min) fps +129%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18 - 154, n=58, last 2 years)
73.2 fps +63%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
62 fps +38%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
52 (46min) fps +16%
Average Intel Arc A370M
  (45 - 46, n=2)
45.5 fps +1%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
45 (40min) fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
14 fps -69%
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
155 fps +185%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
101.3 (71.9min, 78.3P1) fps +87%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 233, n=80, last 2 years)
87.4 fps +61%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
63.1 (44.7min, 48.1P1) fps +16%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
54.3 (41.2min, 42.6P1) fps
Average Intel Arc A370M
  (52.1 - 54.3, n=3)
53 fps -2%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M
52.5 (41.8min, 43.3P1) fps -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
13.8 (5min, 5.01P1) fps -75%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
172 fps +168%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
117.3 (81.6min, 88.1P1) fps +83%
Average of class Multimedia
  (12.8 - 244, n=78, last 2 years)
100.7 fps +57%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
71.5 (52.2min, 55.8P1) fps +11%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
64.2 (45min, 49P1) fps
Average Intel Arc A370M
  (61.4 - 64.2, n=3)
62.5 fps -3%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M
62 (48.9min, 50.2P1) fps -3%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
60.9 (44.1min, 47.9P1) fps -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
17 (6.5min, 8.45P1) fps -74%
GRID Legends
1920x1080 High Preset
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
138 fps +140%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
61.4 (18.1min, 25.2P0.1, 35.2P1) fps +7%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
57.6 (34.7min) fps
Average Intel Arc A370M
  (55 - 57.6, n=2)
56.3 fps -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (12.8 - 67.9, n=2, last 2 years)
40.4 fps -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
21 fps -64%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
110 fps +164%
Average of class Multimedia
  (last 2 years)
49.5 fps +19%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
49.2 (4.44min, 20.5P0.1, 31.2P1) fps +18%
Average Intel Arc A370M
  (41.7 - 41.9, n=2)
41.8 fps 0%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
41.7 (28.8min) fps

在最高设置下,Witcher 3 的压力测试显示出稳定的行为。启动后不久,帧率下降最小,但随后保持绝对稳定。这意味着双风扇可以充分冷却GPU和CPU,即使在特殊情况下,也没有必要进一步降低功耗。

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagramm

05101520253035Tooltip
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE i5-1240P, A370M: Ø22.8 (21-26)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile: Ø33.5 (31-36)
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs: Ø8.36 (6-9)
lowmed.highultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 145.4 135.1 40.5 0 9.67
The Witcher 3 (2015) 121 87 45 25
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 82.6 69.2 62.2 57.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 66.9 34.4 19.6 14.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 36.9 27.4 23.9
Far Cry 5 (2018) 87 48 45 42 28
Strange Brigade (2018) 184.8 76.7 64.2 54.3
God of War (2022) 35 30 24 18 12
GRID Legends (2022) 97.5 68.3 57.6 41.7 31.3
Vampire Bloodhunt (2022) 127 87 62 55 34
F1 22 (2022) 127.2 49.5 46.3 33 2.85
FIFA 23 (2022) 70 (visible stuttering) 62 40 41 30

Emissions - 低调的多媒体笔记本电脑

噪声排放

在最大性能之外,更多的背景噪音是听不到的。作为一项规则,宏碁的笔记本几乎是无声的。

在重度使用期间,风扇的速度经常加快,但速度可以接受。尖叫的风扇在这里不是一个问题。即使在最高的冷却性能下,噪音水平仍在可接受的范围内。那么,Swift X肯定是可以听到的,但与成熟的游戏笔记本或高端领域的创造者笔记本相比,它是安静的。

不幸的是,我们的测试设备产生了令人不快的电子噪音。据推测,这与一个不正确制造的晶体管有关。我们无法确定确切的来源。然而,值得注意的是,它只在低工作负荷时发生,在处理较高的工作负荷后,最初就会沉寂。然而,每次重新启动后,它又出现了。

Noise Level

Idle
25 / 25 / 26.4 dB(A)
Load
36.5 / 43 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2024.824.42430.227.82529.23331.629.4333125.826.124.730.738.94024.622.224.425.431.15031.930.229.623.135.66323.118.217.824.333.88018.216.814.91825.71001917.114.815.728.512519.717.114.518.735.416019.91914.814.72620019.41714.314.322.325019.817.614.61322.131523.319.415.512.223.240025.120.11411.625.150024.519.413.411.524.263025.420.112.811.325.680029.924.513.111.429.2100031.725.313.811.631.5125033.126.915.511.533.1160033.427.314.311.733.4200033.727.913.512.234.1250032.325.913.312.532.231503223.913.612.831.9400031.924.71613.131.9500030.121.714.413.429.5630028.219.314.913.528.3800023.216.514.213.624.61000019.915.514.413.521.21250016.2151413.318.7160001414.813.512.717.9SPL4336.526.424.743N3.92.20.80.64.1median 25.1median 19.4median 14.3median 12.8median 28.3Delta5.63.90.61.34.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAcer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
A370M, i5-1240P, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i5-1240P, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
A370M, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK
Noise
-11%
14%
6%
-16%
-23%
-4%
off / environment *
25
25
-0%
23.3
7%
23
8%
25
-0%
25
-0%
24.2
3%
Idle Minimum *
25
25
-0%
23.3
7%
23
8%
29
-16%
25
-0%
24.2
3%
Idle Average *
25
29
-16%
23.3
7%
23
8%
30
-20%
31.2
-25%
24.2
3%
Idle Maximum *
26.4
31
-17%
23.3
12%
24.7
6%
32
-21%
33.8
-28%
24.2
8%
Load Average *
36.5
46
-26%
25.1
31%
31.7
13%
42
-15%
55.4
-52%
47
-29%
Load Maximum *
43
47
-9%
34
21%
45.2
-5%
54
-26%
56
-30%
47
-9%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42
32.1
45.2
46
47

* ... smaller is better

温度

即使在简单的任务中,宏碁Swift X SFX16也会有一点发热。键盘开始相对较快地感到温暖。在大量使用的情况下,温度上升,在双风扇的区域达到50℃以上。风扇的位置可以在顶部和底部的热图像上清楚地看到。然而,这只适用于极端情况。在Witcher 3 ,只达到43℃,这也将笔记本电脑推向了极限。

这里的一个特殊功能是透风的键盘。因此,与大多数竞争对手不同,顶部的温度比底部高。不幸的是,测得的温度对于实际有限的功耗来说似乎太高了,因此,热量的发展也是如此。在这种情况下,让加热的空气走自然路线的方法似乎很有希望。

Max. Load
 49.7 °C49 °C46.1 °C 
 52 °C43.9 °C34.9 °C 
 41.4 °C29.9 °C30.9 °C 
Maximum: 52 °C
Average: 42 °C
36.6 °C50.4 °C49 °C
33.1 °C44.1 °C44.1 °C
33 °C38.2 °C39.7 °C
Maximum: 50.4 °C
Average: 40.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  47.2 °C | Room Temperature 22.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.4 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.4 °C / 106.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-12.6 °C / -22.7 F).
闲置 - 顶部
闲置 - 顶部
闲置-底部
闲置-底部
负载 - 顶部
负载 - 顶部
负载 - 底部
负载 - 底部
Witcher 3 - 返回顶部
Witcher 3 - 返回顶部
Witcher 3 - 底部
Witcher 3 - 底部
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
Intel Core i5-1240P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Heat
13%
4%
18%
13%
9%
12%
Maximum Upper Side *
52
43
17%
45
13%
36.4
30%
47
10%
40.6
22%
42.9
17%
Maximum Bottom *
50.4
48
5%
42.8
15%
40.4
20%
52
-3%
36
29%
50.6
-0%
Idle Upper Side *
30
26
13%
33
-10%
26.2
13%
25
17%
31.3
-4%
26
13%
Idle Bottom *
32.4
27
17%
33.6
-4%
29.2
10%
24
26%
36
-11%
26.5
18%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在满负荷工作的情况下,Swift X保持良好的冷却效果。
在满负荷工作的情况下,Swift X保持良好的冷却效果。

在最大工作负荷下,我们在Prime95和Furmark的帮助下进行管理,CPU温度可以在短时间内达到100℃的临界极限。然而,这只适用于个别核心,从未适用于整个CPU。

否则就会令人惊讶,最大功耗为100瓦,通常为70瓦。因此,两个风扇相邻的冷却效果是可靠的。

从CPU的功耗中可以清楚地看到冷却性能。35W的功率限制1,定义了不到1分钟的最大负荷,经过较长的时间后,又一次达到了。处理器在整个过程中可以消耗大约30W,因此在压力测试中几乎保持了全部性能。

发言人

至少对于音乐来说,这两个小型立体声扬声器只在有限的范围内适用。几乎完全没有低音,例如可以听到吉他的中低频也非常弱。

另一方面,声音的细节丰富且均匀,听起来很舒服。这对于视频电话、播客和观看直播流来说是足够的。其他的都需要外接扬声器或耳机。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2024.830.224.82533.129.433.1313130.7314027.625.427.65032.223.132.26322.524.322.58016181610018.715.718.712525.918.725.916035.614.735.620037.814.337.825050.91350.93156112.2614006711.66750064.911.564.963064.511.364.580067.211.467.2100064.411.664.4125062.111.562.1160066.311.766.3200069.612.269.6250063.512.563.5315066.412.866.4400066.313.166.3500065.913.465.9630072.813.572.8800069.913.669.9100007213.5721250075.313.375.31600066.412.766.4SPL80.224.780.2N47.90.647.9median 65.9median 12.8median 65.9Delta7.21.37.226.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VEApple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--低消耗、高耐力

消耗功率

在浏览、观看视频和类似的任务时,图形芯片仍然是禁用的。对于多媒体级别来说,其功耗相应较低。通常情况下,8W的功率只被商务和办公笔记本所压制。

由于CPU和GPU即使在负载下也往往只消耗适量的功率,Swift X的功耗略低于70瓦,远远低于大多数有额外显卡的笔记本电脑。

在峰值超过100瓦的情况下,我们希望有一个稍大的电源。然而,这可能不被允许用于Thunderbolt 4,所以这个差异是可控的。在任何情况下,短暂的功率峰值都应该能够被电子产品所吸收。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.45 / 0.75 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.7 / 8 / 10.4 Watt
Load midlight 74 / 108.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
i5-1240P, A370M, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, , 2560x1600, 16"
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
i7-12700H, A370M, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6"
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Average Intel Arc A370M
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
11%
38%
-40%
-55%
-14%
-11%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
5.7
4
30%
2.9
49%
9.1
-60%
8
-40%
5
12%
6.17 ?(3.7 - 9.1, n=3)
-8%
Idle Average *
8
8
-0%
6
25%
11.9
-49%
10
-25%
11.2
-40%
9.17 ?(7.6 - 11.9, n=3)
-15%
Idle Maximum *
10.4
13
-25%
6.9
34%
12.4
-19%
16
-54%
11.6
-12%
Load Average *
74
62
16%
27.3
63%
101.3
-37%
99
-34%
89.3
-21%
81.8 ?(70 - 101.3, n=3)
-11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
65
60
8%
42.6
34%
85.6
-32%
144.6
-122%
83
-28%
Load Maximum *
108.5
70
35%
81.53
25%
155.7
-44%
168
-55%
102
6%
124.1 ?(108 - 155.7, n=3)
-14%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption - The Witcher 3 / Stress test

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø65 (60-77.7)
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø97.5 (90.1-108.6)
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø6.24 (4.5-10.1)

Power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø62.9 (53.1-102.7)
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø99.6 (91.9-104.5)
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø58.8 (53.5-76)
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø61.3 (56.7-75.4)
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.36 (3.82-10.4)

电池寿命

大约一个小时后,电池充了80%的电。
大约一个小时后,电池充了80%的电。

高效率的英特尔酷睿i5-1240P在电池运行时间测试中显而易见。在模拟冲浪以及连续循环播放一部全高清电影时,电池持续了近10个小时。最多时,电池的容量为56Wh,略高于平均水平。

在电池模式下,耗电量没有减少,这反映在高负荷时的运行时间上。不到一个小时的时间是不令人满意的。毕竟,有大量的电力可用于此,即使只是短暂的。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
9h 43min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
7h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 46min
Load (maximum brightness)
0h 54min
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
i5-1240P, A370M, 56 Wh
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 50 Wh
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD
i7-12700H, A370M, 96 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 60 Wh
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, 70 Wh
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 71 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
15%
100%
-40%
-33%
27%
43%
H.264
586
419
-28%
757
29%
WiFi v1.3
583
424
-27%
562
-4%
352
-40%
363
-38%
489
-16%
Load
54
84
56%
164
204%
90
67%
Witcher 3 ultra
83

Pros

+ 高效的CPU-GPU组合
+ 良好的显示价值
+ 电池寿命长
+ TB4 x 2
+ 可扩展的内存空间
+ 更换电池的简单设计
+ 通常保持安静

Cons

- 有限的3D性能
- 没有卡槽
- 非常简单的键盘和触摸板
- 普通的扬声器

结论 - 宏碁Swift X有相当多的平均得分

宏碁Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE,提供的是
宏碁Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE,提供的是

宏碁SFX16-52G的显卡没有预期的严重游戏性能。然而,即使是复杂的3D应用,也能满足基本期望。此外,GPU与i5-1240P 完美协调。这使得笔记本可以快速处理大多数任务,也可以进行图形密集型计算。

峰值的追求是徒劳的。在这方面,与广泛的、有时过度的性能相伴而生的弱点也同样没有。笔记本电脑不会太吵或太热,尽管容量一般,但电池寿命也很出色。此外,我们喜欢存储空间的简易升级选项和普遍良好的可维护性。

对于一台多媒体笔记本来说,合适的性能率和良好的显示效果给人留下了深刻的印象,但宏碁Swift X SFX16的许多,在某些情况下,不必要的弱点却使其蒙羞。

宏碁在其他方面做了节省,以便能够实现令人信服的基本功能,包括一个良好的显示器。外壳在显示屏盖子方面的产量太大。输入设备也可以有更高的质量,特别是触摸板。

此外,冷却系统并不完全令人信服;组件的高效率本可以用稍好的性能来强调。有缺陷的扬声器和缺少一个卡槽,使实际上非常好的总体印象有些减弱。

尽管如此,如果编辑图片和视频是对图形要求最高的任务,Swift X仍然是一个不错的选择。毕竟,其纯粹的性能完全处于仅次于游戏笔记本的要求水平。另一方面,如果你想不时地赌博,联想ThinkBook 16 G4+ ,或者更好,惠普Omen 16-c0077ng 是更合适的选择。如果办公桌上有高质量的显示器,也可以推荐Acer Aspire 5 A515 ,它的显示器在我们的测试中表现得非常令人失望。

价格和可用性

我们测试的宏碁Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE目前在notebooksbilliger.de有售。,配备更快的i7处理器和1TB固态硬盘的版本售价为1499欧元(约合人民币1490元)。和1TB固态硬盘的型号价格为1499欧元(约合人民币1490元)。

Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE - 10/21/2022 v7 (old)
Translated

Chassis
80 / 98 → 81%
Keyboard
80%
Pointing Device
71%
Connectivity
69 / 80 → 87%
Weight
66 / 20-72 → 88%
Battery
85 / 95 → 90%
Display
91%
Games Performance
79 / 90 → 88%
Application Performance
93 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
85%
Noise
92 / 95 → 96%
Audio
68%
Camera
42 / 85 → 50%
Average
77%
86%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 宏碁Swift X SFX16-52G回顾:平衡效率和性能的笔记本电脑
Translated, 2022-11- 1 (Update: 2022-11- 1)