Notebookcheck Logo

Teclast T65 Max 评测--价格低廉的 13 英寸平板电脑

花很少的钱，却能展示很多东西。

Teclast T65 Max 逆流而上。与许多其他 XXL 平板电脑相比，近 13 英寸的 T65 Max 价格超低，起价不到 400 美元。尽管如此，Teclast 却因其丰富的功能选择而具有极高的通用性。
Android Tablet Touchscreen
Teclast T65 Max

12 英寸以上的平板电脑为观看视频和上网提供了大量的屏幕空间，但它们也有一个最大的缺点：价格昂贵。由中国制造商 Teclast 生产的 T65 Max 现在正在尝试完全相反的做法。Android 14 平板电脑的屏幕对角线为 12.95 英寸，这意味着它和 iPad Pro 12.9 英寸一样大。 Apple iPad Pro 12.9-但它的起售价却不到 400 美元。

T65 Max 是 Teclast 迄今最大的平板电脑，尽管价格相对较低，但功能却不少。除了分辨率为 1920 x 1200 像素的 IPS 显示屏外，它还配备了 256 GB 存储空间、4G 调制解调器、10,000 毫安时电池、四个扬声器和 联发科 Helio G99-中端 SoC。让我们来看看这款平板电脑的适用人群。

good (81%) Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99ARM Mali-G57 MP2 Tablet - 05/30/2024 - v7
Test device courtesy of Teclast Germany
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
Teclast T65 Max (T Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP2
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
12.95 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 175 PPI, capacitive, IPS, 300 nits typ. brightness, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 237 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Gyroscope, Compass, Gravity sensor, Distance Sensor, Light Sensor, Hall Sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (Band 2, 3, 5, 8), 3G (Band 1, 2, 5, 8), 4G (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 305 x 199
Battery
10000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 20 watt charging
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix LED flash
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 20W charger (12V/1.67A), USB-C cable, SIM tool, Quick start guide, Warranty card, 12 Months Warranty, Camera2 API Full, fanless
Weight
710 g, Power Supply: 51 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
81.2 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2024
Teclast T65 Max
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2		710 g8.2 mm12.95"1920x1200
84.8 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Honor Pad 9
SD 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710		555 g6.96 mm12.10"2560x1600
86.5 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Huawei MatePad 11.5
SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644		499 g6.85 mm11.50"2200x1440
85.2 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Lenovo Tab P12
Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4		615 g6.9 mm12.70"2944x1840
80.7 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Teclast T60
T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1		570 g7.7 mm11.97"2000x1200

外壳 - T65 Max 采用哑光铝合金一体成型外壳

12.95 英寸的 T65 Max 采用哑光灰色铝合金一体成型机身，看起来质量上乘，做工精良。

另一方面，如果施加压力，Teclast 平板电脑很容易发生扭转，并伴有吱吱嘎嘎的声音。即便如此，T65 Max 的稳定性仍足以满足日常使用需求。不过，它并没有通过 IP 认证。

Teclast 平板电脑的厚度仅为 8.2 毫米，非常纤薄，但由于其 XXL 尺寸，它并不是最轻便的，我们测量的重量为 710 克。不过，它的边框（1 厘米宽）还是让你能舒适地握住平板电脑，而不会意外启动触摸屏。音量摇杆和电源键允许有一点横向弯曲，按压点清晰。

主摄像头采用醒目的高亮边框，将所有注意力吸引到平板电脑的背面。其中的两个镜头都突出后盖约 2 毫米。值得庆幸的是，由于平板电脑体积庞大，放在平面上也不会晃动。

Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max

尺寸比较

❌
305 mm 199 mm 8.2 mm 710 g293.37 mm 190.76 mm 6.9 mm 615 g279 mm 174 mm 7.7 mm 570 g278.27 mm 180.11 mm 6.96 mm 555 g260.88 mm 176.82 mm 6.85 mm 499 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - Teclast 平板电脑的 256 GB 存储空间

Teclast 为 T65 Max 配备了 8GB LPDDR4X 内存和 256GB UFS 2.2 存储空间。它的内存最多可扩展到 20 GB，但不是物理扩展，而是通过存储中的 6 至 12 GB 交换文件进行扩展。由于交换文件的运行速度比内存慢得多，因此这种内存扩展最终仍然是一种营销噱头，没有任何实际好处。

T65 Max 的 USB-C 端口以 USB-2.0 的速度运行，并支持 USB-OTG，因此可以将 U 盘连接到平板电脑上。扩展内部存储的另一个选择是使用 microSD 卡插槽，该插槽可容纳最大 1 TB 的卡。如果不使用 microSD 卡，也可以在混合插槽中插入两张 nano SIM 卡。该设备还配有一个 3.5 毫米插孔，可以连接外部音频设备。

左：扬声器
左：扬声器
右：扬声器、USB-C 2.0、扬声器、混合 SIM 卡/microSD 卡插槽、3.5 毫米插孔
右：扬声器、USB-C 2.0、扬声器、混合 SIM 卡/microSD 卡插槽、3.5 毫米插孔
顶部：电源按钮、音量摇杆、麦克风
顶部：电源按钮、音量摇杆、麦克风
底部：无连接
底部：无连接

microSD 读卡器

使用 Angelbird AV Pro V60 作为 microSD 参考卡，我们注意到该读卡器的读卡速度略高于其姊妹机型 Teclast T60。 Teclast T60.联想 联想平板电脑 P12在连续数据吞吐量和复制测试中均落后于 Teclast T65 Max。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
34.6 MB/s
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
29.8 MB/s -14%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
14.28 MB/s -59%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.8 (26-49.4)
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø25.1 (16-51.7)
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.7 (28-49.4)
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.3 (15.6-78.2)
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø69.6 (39.2-83.8)
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.1 (38.3-83.8)

软件 - Teclast T65 Max，配备Android 14

Android 的最新版本，即Android 14，可在 T65 Max 上运行。没有预装第三方应用程序，这意味着可用存储空间可以得到有效利用。Teclast 平板电脑支持 DRM Widevine L1，因此可以高清播放 Netflix 等受版权保护的流媒体内容。

在五月底进行测试时，该平板电脑使用的系统版本为1.06_20240425 ，其Android 安全补丁是从 2024 年 2 月 5 日开始的，因此并非完全最新。遗憾的是，Teclast 没有提供任何信息说明 T65 Max 将在多长时间内接受操作系统升级和安全补丁，以及这些补丁的交付频率。

Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 5 和 LTE 调制解调器

T65 Max 使用 WiFi 5 作为其最快的 Wi-Fi 标准。使用我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 作为远程站，T65 Max 实现了良好而稳定的传输速率，大致相当于 WiFi 5 可能达到的最大数据吞吐量。它超过了同类设备，如 华为 MatePad 11.5和 联想 Tab P12华为 MatePad 11.5 和联想 Tab P12 等同类设备已经使用了 WiFi 6。

T65 Max 的通信功能还包括蓝牙 5.0 和 4G 移动模块。它支持 LTE 频段 1、3、5、7、8、20、34、38、39、40 和 41，确保了在欧盟地区的良好接收效果。

Networking
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
314 (min: 269) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
371 (min: 344) MBit/s ∼40%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
349 (min: 171) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
366 (min: 184) MBit/s ∼39%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
846 (min: 507) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
792 (min: 376) MBit/s ∼85%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
814 (min: 759) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
928 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼100%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
309 (min: 244) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
360 (min: 341) MBit/s ∼39%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø314 (269-334)
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø343 (171-354)
Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø371 (344-381)
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø360 (184-389)
室内 GPS 接收
室内 GPS 接收
外部 GPS 接收
外部 GPS 接收

T65 Max 使用卫星导航服务 GPS (L1)、Glonass (L1)、Galileo (E1) 和北斗 (B1) 确定位置。在建筑物内，平板电脑能将我们的位置定位在 2 米以内，在室外定位在 1 米以内。

在实际测试中，T65 Max 显示出自己适合执行导航任务--只要你愿意使用一台巨型平板电脑。与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表相比，Teclast 在城市环境中记录路线的准确度并不高。不过，在人口密度较低的地区，T65 Max 的准确度几乎与 Garmin 智能手表相当。

GPS 测试 Teclast T65 Max：概述
GPS 测试 Teclast T65 Max：概述
GPS 测试 Teclast T65 最大： 桥梁
GPS 测试 Teclast T65 最大： 桥梁
GPS 测试 Teclast T65 Max：转折点
GPS 测试 Teclast T65 Max：转折点
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2：概述
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2：概述
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2：桥梁
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2：桥梁
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2：转折点
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2：转折点

照相机 - 可用于拍摄快照

使用自拍相机拍摄的照片
使用自拍相机拍摄的照片

T65 Max 的自拍摄像头分辨率为 800 万像素，采用固定对焦，只要环境光线充足，效果还是可以接受的。它的图像质量对于全高清视频通话也没有问题。

Teclast 平板电脑的主摄像头分辨率为 1300 万像素，与自拍摄像头不同，它支持自动对焦和 LED 闪光灯。后盖上有两个外观相同的镜头。不过，两个镜头中较低的一个不能主动使用，因为它只能作为 1300 万像素主摄像头的深度传感器。

主摄像头的画质对于偶尔拍摄快照来说还不错。它能很好地捕捉图像细节，但同时也会出现对比度较低的情况。应避免放大图像，因为图像很快就会变得模糊。在弱光条件下拍摄时，对相机的要求也过高。

主摄像头可录制高达 2560 x 1440 像素、每秒 30 帧的视频，图像质量与照片相当。此外，您还可以切换到全高清或 720p 格式。

使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Low-light photo

在可控的照明条件下，主摄像头显示出它能够相当准确地捕捉色彩。但是，即使在最佳的工作室照明条件下，它也很难对焦捕捉测试图。在 1 勒克斯的残余光下，相机不再能获得任何有意义的结果--ColorChecker 颜色图和测试图都不再可见。

ColorChecker
3.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T65 Max: 4.97 ∆E min: 1.13 - max: 10.3 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
54.9 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
53.5 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
46.6 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T65 Max: 47.62 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 94.33 ∆E

附件和保修 - 20 瓦电源和一个可选的对开手提箱

附带的 20 瓦电源
附带的 20 瓦电源

Teclast T65 Max 的供货范围包括 20 瓦电源（12V/1,67A）、USB-C 数据线、SIM 卡工具、简短的说明书和保修卡。制造商还提供可选的对开保护套，您可以通过其网站购买。

Teclast T65 Max 提供 12 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 面部识别，但无指纹传感器

T65 Max 的触摸屏运行良好，边缘和边角的输入都能准确识别。八核 联发科 Helio G99SoC 为平板电脑提供了较高的系统速度，即使同时打开多个应用程序也不会出现速度下降的情况。不过，由于其刷新率为 60Hz，屏幕上的描绘并不那么流畅。

T65 Max 没有指纹传感器。这意味着你只能使用二维面部识别进行生物识别登录--在光线充足的条件下效果很好。其他登录选项包括图案、PIN 码和密码。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
水平键盘
水平键盘

显示屏 - 无 PWM 的暗光 IPS 面板

子像素
子像素

T65 Max 的 12.95 英寸 IPS 面板分辨率为 1920 x 1200 像素。因此，它的屏幕纵横比为 16:10，像素密度为 175 PPI。显示屏不支持 HDR。

在白色背景下，IPS 显示屏的平均亮度为 289.6 cd/m²。

IPS 面板的亮度很容易满足室内使用要求，但如果要在室外使用平板电脑，亮度可能就不够了。此外，本次比较中的所有竞争平板电脑都具有更好的亮度，尤其是 Honor Pad 9的亮度高达 613 cd/m²。

Teclast T65 Max 非常适合对 PWM 闪烁敏感的用户，因为它不使用脉宽调制进行亮度控制。

269
cd/m²		285
cd/m²		289
cd/m²
285
cd/m²		296
cd/m²		293
cd/m²
288
cd/m²		309
cd/m²		292
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 309 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 289.6 cd/m² Minimum: 12.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 296 cd/m²
Contrast: 630:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.204
Teclast T65 Max
IPS, 1920x1200, 13"		Honor Pad 9
IPS LCD, 2560x1600, 12.1"		Huawei MatePad 11.5
IPS, 2200x1440, 11.5"		Lenovo Tab P12
LTPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"		Teclast T60
IPS, 2000x1200, 12"
Screen
69%
43%
40%
42%
Brightness middle
296
613
107%
472
59%
435
47%
352
19%
Brightness
290
570
97%
432
49%
407
40%
324
12%
Brightness Distribution
87
87
0%
86
-1%
89
2%
88
1%
Black Level *
0.47
0.4
15%
0.44
6%
0.58
-23%
Contrast
630
1533
143%
1073
70%
750
19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.1
2.7
62%
3.4
52%
1.5
79%
2.6
63%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
22.2
5.1
77%
6.6
70%
3.2
86%
5.75
74%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
8
3.7
54%
4.8
40%
2.4
70%
1.5
81%
Gamma
2.204 100%
2.3 96%
2.41 91%
2.2 100%
2.319 95%
CCT
7992 81%
6763 96%
7035 92%
6546 99%
6747 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

使用出厂设置的色彩模式标准（也可选择暖色和冷色），IPS 面板的色彩还原略微偏离理想线。由于黑色值高达 0.47 cd/m²，它显示出明显的偏蓝，对比度仅为 630:1。肉眼并不能明显看出其色彩准确度较低，但其显示效果略显苍白。

色彩精度（色彩模式标准）
色彩精度（色彩模式标准）
灰度（标准色彩模式）
灰度（标准色彩模式）
色彩饱和度（标准色彩模式）
色彩饱和度（标准色彩模式）
色彩空间 sRGB（色彩模式标准）
色彩空间 sRGB（色彩模式标准）
色彩空间 DCI-P3（色彩模式标准）
色彩空间 DCI-P3（色彩模式标准）
色彩空间 AdobeRGB（色彩模式标准）
色彩空间 AdobeRGB（色彩模式标准）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
22.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.8 ms rise
↘ 9.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.5 ms rise
↘ 24.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

T65 Max 只在有限的范围内适合户外使用。在阳光直射下，IPS 面板上的内容仍然清晰可辨，但强烈的反光使阅读相当困难。另一方面，这款平板电脑在阴凉处也能很好地使用。

室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用

IPS 面板的视角稳定性尚可，但绝对可以做得更好一些。从侧面观看时，屏幕会明显变暗，但不会使色彩失真。

视角
视角

性能 - 配备联发科 Helio G99 的 Teclast T65 Max

联发科 联发科 Helio G992022 年推出的联发科 Helio G99 绝不会让 T65 Max 成为性能超群的飞行器，但其 SoC 性能足以满足多媒体使用和网上冲浪的需求。只有在运行非常复杂的应用程序时，这款平板电脑的性能才会达到极限。在这个价位的平板电脑中，有很多都比它快得多。华为 华为 MatePad 11.5和 联想平板电脑 P12等平板电脑的速度更快。

Geekbench 6.3 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | AImark | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android
Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=70, last 2 years)
3544 Points +90%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
2970 Points +59%
Honor Pad 9
2773 Points +49%
Lenovo Tab P12
2422 Points +30%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1864 - 2065, n=11)
1987 Points +6%
Teclast T65 Max
1867 Points
Teclast T60
1596 Points -15%
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=70, last 2 years)
1111 Points +56%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
1059 Points +49%
Lenovo Tab P12
958 Points +35%
Honor Pad 9
944 Points +33%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (710 - 738, n=11)
728 Points +2%
Teclast T65 Max
711 Points
Teclast T60
440 Points -38%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Huawei MatePad 11.5
781 Points +47%
Lenovo Tab P12
738 Points +39%
Honor Pad 9
725 Points +37%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
707 Points +33%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (490 - 576, n=17)
547 Points +3%
Teclast T65 Max
531 Points
Teclast T60
361 Points -32%
Multi-Core
Huawei MatePad 11.5
2854 Points +69%
Honor Pad 9
2763 Points +63%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2494 Points +47%
Lenovo Tab P12
1973 Points +17%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1670 - 1981, n=17)
1828 Points +8%
Teclast T65 Max
1693 Points
Teclast T60
1502 Points -11%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=37, last 2 years)
781418 Points +95%
Honor Pad 9
490448 Points +22%
Teclast T65 Max
401641 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (383511 - 421861, n=5)
400611 Points 0%
Teclast T60
257601 Points -36%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5
556242 Points +73%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=48, last 2 years)
469872 Points +46%
Lenovo Tab P12
442871 Points +37%
Teclast T65 Max
322195 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (229468 - 375956, n=8)
317183 Points -2%
Teclast T60
235075 Points -27%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Lenovo Tab P12
12131 Points +37%
Honor Pad 9
11693 Points +32%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
10389 Points +17%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (8885 - 11379, n=17)
9894 Points +11%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
9847 Points +11%
Teclast T65 Max
8885 Points
Teclast T60
7992 Points -10%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)
773 Points +41%
Honor Pad 9
689 Points +26%
Lenovo Tab P12
682 Points +24%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (526 - 602, n=10)
565 Points +3%
Teclast T65 Max
549 Points
Teclast T60
386 Points -30%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Huawei MatePad 11.5
4784 Points +67%
Honor Pad 9
4233 Points +48%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)
4205 Points +47%
Lenovo Tab P12
4158 Points +45%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2855 - 3120, n=10)
3006 Points +5%
Teclast T65 Max
2869 Points
Teclast T60
2182 Points -24%
System
Honor Pad 9
10083 Points +70%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
9716 Points +63%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)
7265 Points +22%
Lenovo Tab P12
6610 Points +11%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (5261 - 6776, n=10)
6230 Points +5%
Teclast T65 Max
5944 Points
Teclast T60
5151 Points -13%
Memory
Lenovo Tab P12
5807 Points +60%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
4970 Points +37%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)
4862 Points +34%
Honor Pad 9
4837 Points +34%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (3454 - 4152, n=10)
3764 Points +4%
Teclast T65 Max
3619 Points
Teclast T60
3255 Points -10%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)
9168 Points +235%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
7739 Points +183%
Honor Pad 9
5783 Points +111%
Lenovo Tab P12
4975 Points +82%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2683 - 3002, n=10)
2799 Points +2%
Teclast T65 Max
2738 Points
Teclast T60
1146 Points -58%
Web
Lenovo Tab P12
1566 Points +36%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
1402 Points +22%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)
1269 Points +10%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1150 - 1325, n=10)
1252 Points +9%
Honor Pad 9
1192 Points +4%
Teclast T60
1179 Points +3%
Teclast T65 Max
1150 Points
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)
7290 Points +724%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (877 - 982, n=8)
908 Points +3%
Teclast T65 Max
885 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5
668 Points -25%
Honor Pad 9
644 Points -27%
Lenovo Tab P12
456 Points -48%
Teclast T60
321 Points -64%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)
11323 Points +31%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
9027 Points +5%
Teclast T65 Max
8626 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (6323 - 9695, n=9)
8584 Points 0%
Honor Pad 9
7236 Points -16%
Lenovo Tab P12
5315 Points -38%
Teclast T60
2902 Points -66%

Legend

 
Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255 (T616), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
 
Average Mediatek Helio G99
 
Average of class Tablet

联发科 联发科 Helio G99's ARM Mali-G57 MC2为 T65 Max 提供了稳定的图形处理性能。GFXBench 测试表明，你甚至可以在更高的细节设置下流畅运行游戏。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
825 Points +148%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
611 Points +84%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
611 Points +84%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
332 Points
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
127 Points -62%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
829 Points +144%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
623 Points +83%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
618 Points +82%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
340 Points
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
129 Points -62%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3164 Points +213%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2402 Points +138%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2237 Points +121%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1011 Points
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
476 Points -53%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3157 Points +159%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2367 Points +94%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2156 Points +77%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1221 Points
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
479 Points -61%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6367 Points +149%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4307 Points +69%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2554 Points
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
1106 Points -57%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7147 Points +201%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4301 Points +81%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2375 Points
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
937 Points -61%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4608 Points +33%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4307 Points +24%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3468 Points
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
2990 Points -14%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps +20%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +18%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
50 fps 0%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
50 fps
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
24 fps -52%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
150 fps +163%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
105 fps +84%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
100 fps +75%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
25 fps -56%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps +61%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps -3%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps -22%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
16 fps -56%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
91 fps +139%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps +68%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps +63%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
16 fps -58%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
44 fps +83%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps 0%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -33%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
9.5 fps -60%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
65 fps +171%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps +92%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps +79%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
9.8 fps -59%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +79%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11 fps -21%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.9 fps -29%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
5.7 fps -59%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps +153%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +73%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps +53%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
6.1 fps -59%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps +86%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.7 fps
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.4 fps -3%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.1 fps -27%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
3.7 fps -62%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +188%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11.2 fps +90%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps +86%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
2.3 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +100%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps 0%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -27%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
5.8 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +194%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps +94%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps +81%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
6.2 fps -61%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.6 fps +204%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4.8 fps +92%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.7 fps +88%
Teclast T65 Max
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.5 fps
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
0.98 fps -61%

T65 Max 在我们的浏览器基准测试中成绩一般，不得不承认输给了速度更快的平板电脑，如 Honor Pad 9和 华为 MatePad 11.5.在网上冲浪时，你应该不会注意到任何性能限制，因为网站很快就能完全加载，然后可以流畅地滚动浏览。

Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)
111.2 Points +39%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
88.235 Points +11%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)
86.231 Points +8%
Teclast T65 Max (Chrome 125.0.6422.53)
79.796 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
75.924 Points -5%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 80.9, n=9)
66.5 Points -17%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
56.281 Points -29%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=69, last 2 years)
106.9 Points +23%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
95 Points +9%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)
91 Points +5%
Teclast T65 Max (Chrome 125.0.6422.53)
87 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
78 Points -10%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 89, n=9)
69.6 Points -20%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
60 Points -31%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)
155.2 Points +49%
Honor Pad 9
132 Points +27%
Teclast T65 Max (Chrome 125.0.6422.53)
104 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
99 Points -5%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (80 - 112, n=8)
95.4 Points -8%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)
121.9 runs/min +71%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
86.6 runs/min +21%
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
78 runs/min +9%
Teclast T65 Max (Chrome 125.0.6422.53)
71.3 runs/min
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)
61.5 runs/min -14%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (24.1 - 80.7, n=9)
52.5 runs/min -26%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
44.4 runs/min -38%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
32436 Points +32%
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
31245 Points +28%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)
30021 Points +23%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)
29371 Points +20%
Teclast T65 Max (Chrome 125.0.6422.53)
24489 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 25005, n=17)
20999 Points -14%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
15304 Points -38%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)
3734 ms * -104%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
2592 ms * -41%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1671 - 2444, n=9)
2058 ms * -12%
Teclast T65 Max (Chrome 125.0.6422.53)
1834.7 ms *
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
1460.1 ms * +20%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)
1365.8 ms * +26%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
1321.1 ms * +28%

* ... smaller is better

Teclast 平板电脑采用 UFS 2.2 存储系统，加载时间短，数据吞吐量大，这是此类存储系统的特点。平板电脑 Honor Pad 9采用 UFS 3.1 存储，速度更快。

Teclast T65 MaxHonor Pad 9Huawei MatePad 11.5Lenovo Tab P12Teclast T60Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
50%
36%
5%
-70%
-2%
-7%
Sequential Read 256KB
967.58
1921.34
99%
1037.71
7%
956.07
-1%
240.4
-75%
887 ?(482 - 1009, n=32)
-8%
1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years)
8%
Sequential Write 256KB
707.27
1222.83
73%
903.32
28%
776.24
10%
230
-67%
694 ?(369 - 913, n=32)
-2%
686 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years)
-3%
Random Read 4KB
201.81
256.06
27%
297.25
47%
241.23
20%
76.4
-62%
228 ?(99.7 - 291, n=32)
13%
189.4 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years)
-6%
Random Write 4KB
262.04
266.17
2%
418.84
60%
234.58
-10%
67.5
-74%
238 ?(99.2 - 319, n=32)
-9%
189.9 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years)
-28%

游戏 - 有限制的游戏

我们使用 Genshin Impact和PUBG Mobile来了解当前游戏在 T65 Max 上的运行情况。我们使用Gamebench测试工具记录了平板电脑的帧率。

T65 Max 在《PUBG Mobile》上的表现非常轻松，在高清设置下，它能以每秒 30 帧的速度非常稳定地运行这款战术射击游戏。在最低设置 "Liquid"下，它甚至能达到几乎连续的 40 帧/秒。

在玩《源氏冲击》这款图形要求更高的游戏时，如果将所有图形细节设置为最低，每秒帧数可以超过 50 帧。不过，在最高细节级别下玩这款游戏几乎没有任何乐趣可言。在这样做的时候，我们注意到帧速率会反复严重下降，《源氏冲击》的平均帧速率只有 20 多帧。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Teclast T65 Max; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.6.0_22174900_22378599: Ø39.7 (28-53)
Teclast T65 Max; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.6.0_22174900_22378599: Ø20.7 (4-31)
Teclast T65 Max; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.2.0: Ø39.7 (38-41)
Teclast T65 Max; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.2.0: Ø29.6 (27-31)

排放 - T65 Max 内有 4 个扬声器

温度

在负载情况下，Teclast T65 Max 几乎不会发热。即使在使用 Burnout 基准进行了一个小时的压力测试后，我们也只注意到最高表面温度为 31.7 °C。使用 3DMark Wild Life 和 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 进行的进一步压力测试显示出非常均匀的进展，这意味着 Teclast 平板电脑即使在负载情况下也不会降低其性能。

Max. Load
 28.7 °C31.4 °C31.7 °C 
 28 °C28.2 °C27.1 °C 
 28.4 °C27.2 °C26.6 °C 
Maximum: 31.7 °C
Average: 28.6 °C
27.6 °C33.7 °C29 °C
27.6 °C29.6 °C29.6 °C
27 °C28.6 °C28.4 °C
Maximum: 33.7 °C
Average: 29 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.1 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.3 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

0123456789101112131415161718Tooltip
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.19 (6.84-7.35)
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.1 (14.1-14.1)
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø18.8 (18.8-18.9)
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø12.9 (12.9-12.9)
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.87 (2.85-2.87)
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.65 (3.65-3.66)
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.94 (4.94-4.96)
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.71 (3.7-3.72)
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.787 (0.742-0.833)
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.22 (7.21-7.22)
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.3 (14.2-14.3)
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei MatePad 11.5
99.5 (4.94min - 4.96max) %
Honor Pad 9
99.5 (3.65min - 3.66max) %
Lenovo Tab P12
99.4 (3.7min - 3.72max) %
Teclast T60
89.1 (0.742min - 0.833max) %
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Tab P12
99.7 (12.9min - 12.9max) % +7%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
99.7 (18.8min - 18.9max) % +7%
Honor Pad 9
99.7 (14.1min - 14.1max) % +7%
Teclast T60
99.4 (2.85min - 2.87max) % +7%
Teclast T65 Max
93 (6.84min - 7.35max) %
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Teclast T65 Max
99.9 (7.21min - 7.22max) %
Honor Pad 9
99.3 (14.2min - 14.3max) % -1%

Legend

 
Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255 (T616), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
Teclast T65 Max
Teclast T65 Max

发言人

Teclast 为 T65 Max 配备了四个扬声器。它们位于平板电脑的两个短边，产生的声音偏高音，低音音量不大。不过总的来说，它们的音效在这个价位的平板电脑中还算不错。

外置音频设备可通过 USB-C 端口或蓝牙连接。平板电脑支持最重要的蓝牙编解码器，如 SBC、AAC 和 LDAC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.128.82528.729.13123.1284026.531.35037.6366319.627.68016.724.310024.220.512520.424.616020.534.120011.64725010.751.731510.354.94007.853.45008.156.76309.265.78009.570.610009.672.612508.17516009.367.220009.772.5250010.271.5315010.965.6400011.467.7500012.368630012.870.2800013.965.91000014.669.21250015.468.21600016.251.6SPL23.682N0.551.6median 10.9median 65.9Delta2.68.436.243.130.736.825.629.426.733.536.737.824.63617.634.318.742.618.254.715.963.617.362.415.266.514.171.213.469.613.874.114.377.513.779.712.48112.782.112.178.312.977.612.574.712.270.612.872.313.172.613.576.513.175.913.774.31464.513.358.725.289.10.782.9median 13.5median 74.11.25.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTeclast T65 MaxHonor Pad 9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Teclast T65 Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor Pad 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 配有 10,000 毫安时电池的 T65 Max

耗电量

T65 Max 的 10,000 毫安时电池可使用附带的电源以最大 20 瓦的功率充电。在我们的测试中，平板电脑从 0 充到 100 % 需要 2:30 小时。1:43小时后，电池容量达到80%。

在功耗方面，Teclast 大型平板电脑的表现堪称典范，因为它在闲置模式下的功耗仅为 2.6 瓦。在负载情况下，它的耗电量也相当低，平均为 6 瓦。只有 Teclast T60更节能。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.9 / 2.6 / 2.8 Watt
Load midlight 6 / 10.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Teclast T65 Max
10000 mAh		Honor Pad 9
8300 mAh		Huawei MatePad 11.5
7700 mAh		Lenovo Tab P12
10200 mAh		Teclast T60
8000 mAh
Power Consumption
-102%
-39%
-100%
32%
Idle Minimum *
1.9
1.5
21%
1.23
35%
1.91
-1%
1.2
37%
Idle Average *
2.6
8.39
-223%
4.44
-71%
7.94
-205%
1.4
46%
Idle Maximum *
2.8
8.46
-202%
4.49
-60%
8.12
-190%
1.7
39%
Load Average *
6
11.65
-94%
11.2
-87%
10.68
-78%
4.2
30%
Load Maximum *
10.2
11.67
-14%
11.32
-11%
12.69
-24%
9.5
7%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99: Ø8.1 (6.4-10.2)
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1: Ø6.14 (3.02-10.1)
Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050: Ø6.66 (3.76-11.1)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.02 (6.23-8.36)
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.94 (4.74-5.39)
Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.8 (5.4-6.3)
Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.65 (2.59-2.79)
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.03 (3-3.25)
Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.85 (3.8-4.02)

运行时间

作为一款 XXL 平板电脑，T65 Max 的电池续航能力好得令人难以置信。在模拟网上冲浪测试中，这款 12.95 英寸的平板电脑只用了不到 12 小时就再次插上了电源，而在连续循环播放视频时，它的续航时间也差不多，为 11:25 小时。

联想 联想平板电脑 P12拥有 12.7 英寸对角线屏幕和 10,200 毫安时电池，在这些方面与 T65 Max 非常相似，但在续航时间上却无法与 T65 Max 相提并论。稍小的 Teclast T60的续航时间甚至比 T65 Max 更长。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
24h 33min
WiFi Websurfing
11h 52min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 25min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 24min
Teclast T65 Max
10000 mAh		Honor Pad 9
8300 mAh		Huawei MatePad 11.5
7700 mAh		Lenovo Tab P12
10200 mAh		Teclast T60
8000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-7%
14%
-5%
60%
Reader / Idle
1473
1702
16%
1592
8%
3313
125%
H.264
685
874
28%
600
-12%
1145
67%
WiFi v1.3
712
661
-7%
866
22%
675
-5%
1096
54%
Load
264
237
-10%
231
-12%
249
-6%

Pros

+ 大型 16:10 显示屏
+ 无 PWM
+ Android 14
+ DRM Widevine L1
+ 高品质金属外壳
+ 运行时间长
+ 大量存储空间
+ 4G 调制解调器和双卡双待

Cons

- 显示屏昏暗
- 摄像头不佳
- 无指纹传感器
- 更新交付不明确

对 Teclast T65 Max 的评价

Teclast T65 Max 评论。测试设备由德国 Teclast 提供。
Teclast T65 Max 评论。测试设备由德国 Teclast 提供。

Teclast T65 Max 提供了很少见的超大显示屏与低廉价格的完美组合。Android 14 平板电脑的价格已经低于 400 美元，其接近 13 英寸的 16:10 显示屏提供了很大的空间，而且由于获得了 Widevine L1 认证，它还可以播放受拷贝保护的高清流媒体。

此外，其良好的总成绩还得益于纤薄边框的现代设计、稳定的 SoC 性能、相对宽裕的存储空间（256 GB）、预装Android 14 无臃肿软件、4G 调制解调器和良好的电池续航能力。此外，20 瓦的电源可让 T65 Max 在短时间内充满电。

由于配备了 4G 调制解调器，Teclast T65 Max 可以很好地满足上网冲浪和多媒体平板电脑的需求，但由于其显示屏有些暗淡，因此只在有限的范围内适合户外使用。

Teclast 还在其 XXL 平板电脑上做了一两处改进。主要的批评意见包括：T65 Max 的显示屏非常暗，很难在户外使用，而且更新交付不明确。它的摄像头也不是最好的，但在这样一款经济实惠的平板电脑上看到这一点也不足为奇。

Teclast T65 Max 的替代产品是 联想平板电脑 P12它的速度更快、屏幕更亮，而且支持笔输入--所有这些都在与 Teclast 平板电脑相同大小的外壳内。平板电脑 Teclast T60也值得一看，而且它的运行时间比 T65 Max 更长。

价格和供应情况

您可以通过制造商的亚马逊店面查看 Teclast 的所有平板电脑。目前，T65 Max 的售价约为 350 美元。

Teclast T65 Max - 05/30/2024 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
79 / 98 → 81%
Keyboard
73 / 80 → 91%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
45 / 70 → 64%
Weight
80 / 40-88 → 83%
Battery
89%
Display
73%
Games Performance
27 / 78 → 34%
Application Performance
71 / 92 → 77%
Temperature
96%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 83%
Camera
51 / 85 → 60%
Average
73%
81%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Teclast T65 Max 评测--价格低廉的 13 英寸平板电脑
Manuel Masiero, 2024-06- 1 (Update: 2024-08-15)