Teclast T65 Max 评测--价格低廉的 13 英寸平板电脑

Name: Teclast T65 Max
Brand: Teclast

花很少的钱，却能展示很多东西。 Teclast T65 Max 逆流而上。与许多其他 XXL 平板电脑相比，近 13 英寸的 T65 Max 价格超低，起价不到 400 美元。尽管如此，Teclast 却因其丰富的功能选择而具有极高的通用性。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/01/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Tablet Touchscreen

12 英寸以上的平板电脑为观看视频和上网提供了大量的屏幕空间，但它们也有一个最大的缺点：价格昂贵。由中国制造商 Teclast 生产的 T65 Max 现在正在尝试完全相反的做法。Android 14 平板电脑的屏幕对角线为 12.95 英寸，这意味着它和 iPad Pro 12.9 英寸一样大。 Apple iPad Pro 12.9-但它的起售价却不到 400 美元。

T65 Max 是 Teclast 迄今最大的平板电脑，尽管价格相对较低，但功能却不少。除了分辨率为 1920 x 1200 像素的 IPS 显示屏外，它还配备了 256 GB 存储空间、4G 调制解调器、10,000 毫安时电池、四个扬声器和联发科 Helio G99-中端 SoC。让我们来看看这款平板电脑的适用人群。

Test device courtesy of Teclast Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Teclast T65 Max (T Series)

Processor

Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP2

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR4X

Display

12.95 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 175 PPI, capacitive, IPS, 300 nits typ. brightness, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB

, 237 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Gyroscope, Compass, Gravity sensor, Distance Sensor, Light Sensor, Hall Sensor

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (Band 2, 3, 5, 8), 3G (Band 1, 2, 5, 8), 4G (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 305 x 199

Battery

10000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 20 watt charging

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix LED flash
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 20W charger (12V/1.67A), USB-C cable, SIM tool, Quick start guide, Warranty card, 12 Months Warranty, Camera2 API Full, fanless

Weight

710 g, Power Supply: 51 g

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
81.2 %	06/2024	Teclast T65 Max Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2	710 g	8.2 mm	12.95"	1920x1200
84.8 %	03/2024	Honor Pad 9 SD 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710	555 g	6.96 mm	12.10"	2560x1600
86.5 %	09/2023	Huawei MatePad 11.5 SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644	499 g	6.85 mm	11.50"	2200x1440
85.2 %	09/2023	Lenovo Tab P12 Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4	615 g	6.9 mm	12.70"	2944x1840
80.7 %	01/2024	Teclast T60 T616, Mali-G57 MP1	570 g	7.7 mm	11.97"	2000x1200

外壳 - T65 Max 采用哑光铝合金一体成型外壳

12.95 英寸的 T65 Max 采用哑光灰色铝合金一体成型机身，看起来质量上乘，做工精良。

另一方面，如果施加压力，Teclast 平板电脑很容易发生扭转，并伴有吱吱嘎嘎的声音。即便如此，T65 Max 的稳定性仍足以满足日常使用需求。不过，它并没有通过 IP 认证。

Teclast 平板电脑的厚度仅为 8.2 毫米，非常纤薄，但由于其 XXL 尺寸，它并不是最轻便的，我们测量的重量为 710 克。不过，它的边框（1 厘米宽）还是让你能舒适地握住平板电脑，而不会意外启动触摸屏。音量摇杆和电源键允许有一点横向弯曲，按压点清晰。

主摄像头采用醒目的高亮边框，将所有注意力吸引到平板电脑的背面。其中的两个镜头都突出后盖约 2 毫米。值得庆幸的是，由于平板电脑体积庞大，放在平面上也不会晃动。

尺寸比较

连接性 - Teclast 平板电脑的 256 GB 存储空间

Teclast 为 T65 Max 配备了 8GB LPDDR4X 内存和 256GB UFS 2.2 存储空间。它的内存最多可扩展到 20 GB，但不是物理扩展，而是通过存储中的 6 至 12 GB 交换文件进行扩展。由于交换文件的运行速度比内存慢得多，因此这种内存扩展最终仍然是一种营销噱头，没有任何实际好处。

T65 Max 的 USB-C 端口以 USB-2.0 的速度运行，并支持 USB-OTG，因此可以将 U 盘连接到平板电脑上。扩展内部存储的另一个选择是使用 microSD 卡插槽，该插槽可容纳最大 1 TB 的卡。如果不使用 microSD 卡，也可以在混合插槽中插入两张 nano SIM 卡。该设备还配有一个 3.5 毫米插孔，可以连接外部音频设备。

右：扬声器、USB-C 2.0、扬声器、混合 SIM 卡/microSD 卡插槽、3.5 毫米插孔

microSD 读卡器

使用 Angelbird AV Pro V60 作为 microSD 参考卡，我们注意到该读卡器的读卡速度略高于其姊妹机型 Teclast T60。 Teclast T60.联想联想平板电脑 P12在连续数据吞吐量和复制测试中均落后于 Teclast T65 Max。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	34.6 MB/s
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	29.8 MB/s -14%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	14.28 MB/s -59%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.8 (26-49.4)

Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø25.1 (16-51.7)

Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.7 (28-49.4)

Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.3 (15.6-78.2)

Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø69.6 (39.2-83.8)

Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.1 (38.3-83.8)

软件 - Teclast T65 Max，配备Android 14

Android 的最新版本，即Android 14，可在 T65 Max 上运行。没有预装第三方应用程序，这意味着可用存储空间可以得到有效利用。Teclast 平板电脑支持 DRM Widevine L1，因此可以高清播放 Netflix 等受版权保护的流媒体内容。

在五月底进行测试时，该平板电脑使用的系统版本为1.06_20240425 ，其Android 安全补丁是从 2024 年 2 月 5 日开始的，因此并非完全最新。遗憾的是，Teclast 没有提供任何信息说明 T65 Max 将在多长时间内接受操作系统升级和安全补丁，以及这些补丁的交付频率。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 5 和 LTE 调制解调器

T65 Max 使用 WiFi 5 作为其最快的 Wi-Fi 标准。使用我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 作为远程站，T65 Max 实现了良好而稳定的传输速率，大致相当于 WiFi 5 可能达到的最大数据吞吐量。它超过了同类设备，如华为 MatePad 11.5和联想 Tab P12华为 MatePad 11.5 和联想 Tab P12 等同类设备已经使用了 WiFi 6。

T65 Max 的通信功能还包括蓝牙 5.0 和 4G 移动模块。它支持 LTE 频段 1、3、5、7、8、20、34、38、39、40 和 41，确保了在欧盟地区的良好接收效果。

Networking
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	314 (min: 269) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	371 (min: 344) MBit/s ∼40%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	349 (min: 171) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	366 (min: 184) MBit/s ∼39%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	846 (min: 507) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	792 (min: 376) MBit/s ∼85%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	814 (min: 759) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	928 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼100%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	309 (min: 244) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	360 (min: 341) MBit/s ∼39%

Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø314 (269-334)

Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø343 (171-354)

Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø371 (344-381)

Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø360 (184-389)

T65 Max 使用卫星导航服务 GPS (L1)、Glonass (L1)、Galileo (E1) 和北斗 (B1) 确定位置。在建筑物内，平板电脑能将我们的位置定位在 2 米以内，在室外定位在 1 米以内。

在实际测试中，T65 Max 显示出自己适合执行导航任务--只要你愿意使用一台巨型平板电脑。与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表相比，Teclast 在城市环境中记录路线的准确度并不高。不过，在人口密度较低的地区，T65 Max 的准确度几乎与 Garmin 智能手表相当。

照相机 - 可用于拍摄快照

T65 Max 的自拍摄像头分辨率为 800 万像素，采用固定对焦，只要环境光线充足，效果还是可以接受的。它的图像质量对于全高清视频通话也没有问题。

Teclast 平板电脑的主摄像头分辨率为 1300 万像素，与自拍摄像头不同，它支持自动对焦和 LED 闪光灯。后盖上有两个外观相同的镜头。不过，两个镜头中较低的一个不能主动使用，因为它只能作为 1300 万像素主摄像头的深度传感器。

主摄像头的画质对于偶尔拍摄快照来说还不错。它能很好地捕捉图像细节，但同时也会出现对比度较低的情况。应避免放大图像，因为图像很快就会变得模糊。在弱光条件下拍摄时，对相机的要求也过高。

主摄像头可录制高达 2560 x 1440 像素、每秒 30 帧的视频，图像质量与照片相当。此外，您还可以切换到全高清或 720p 格式。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1 Daylight photo 2 Low-light photo

click to load images

Teclast T65 Max

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 15

Samsung Galaxy S24 Utra

click to load images

Teclast T65 Max

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 15

Samsung Galaxy S24 Utra

click to load images

Teclast T65 Max

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 15

Samsung Galaxy S24 Utra

在可控的照明条件下，主摄像头显示出它能够相当准确地捕捉色彩。但是，即使在最佳的工作室照明条件下，它也很难对焦捕捉测试图。在 1 勒克斯的残余光下，相机不再能获得任何有意义的结果--ColorChecker 颜色图和测试图都不再可见。

附件和保修 - 20 瓦电源和一个可选的对开手提箱

Teclast T65 Max 的供货范围包括 20 瓦电源（12V/1,67A）、USB-C 数据线、SIM 卡工具、简短的说明书和保修卡。制造商还提供可选的对开保护套，您可以通过其网站购买。

Teclast T65 Max 提供 12 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 面部识别，但无指纹传感器

T65 Max 的触摸屏运行良好，边缘和边角的输入都能准确识别。八核联发科 Helio G99SoC 为平板电脑提供了较高的系统速度，即使同时打开多个应用程序也不会出现速度下降的情况。不过，由于其刷新率为 60Hz，屏幕上的描绘并不那么流畅。

T65 Max 没有指纹传感器。这意味着你只能使用二维面部识别进行生物识别登录--在光线充足的条件下效果很好。其他登录选项包括图案、PIN 码和密码。

显示屏 - 无 PWM 的暗光 IPS 面板

T65 Max 的 12.95 英寸 IPS 面板分辨率为 1920 x 1200 像素。因此，它的屏幕纵横比为 16:10，像素密度为 175 PPI。显示屏不支持 HDR。

在白色背景下，IPS 显示屏的平均亮度为 289.6 cd/m²。

IPS 面板的亮度很容易满足室内使用要求，但如果要在室外使用平板电脑，亮度可能就不够了。此外，本次比较中的所有竞争平板电脑都具有更好的亮度，尤其是 Honor Pad 9的亮度高达 613 cd/m²。

Teclast T65 Max 非常适合对 PWM 闪烁敏感的用户，因为它不使用脉宽调制进行亮度控制。


269 cd/m²	285 cd/m²	289 cd/m²
285 cd/m²	296 cd/m²	293 cd/m²
288 cd/m²	309 cd/m²	292 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 309 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 289.6 cd/m² Minimum: 12.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 296 cd/m²
Contrast: 630:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.98
ΔE Greyscale 8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
90.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.204

	Teclast T65 Max IPS, 1920x1200, 12.95	Honor Pad 9 IPS LCD, 2560x1600, 12.10	Huawei MatePad 11.5 IPS, 2200x1440, 11.50	Lenovo Tab P12 LTPS, 2944x1840, 12.70	Teclast T60 IPS, 2000x1200, 11.97
Screen		69%	43%	40%	42%
Brightness middle	296	613 107%	472 59%	435 47%	352 19%
Brightness	290	570 97%	432 49%	407 40%	324 12%
Brightness Distribution	87	87 0%	86 -1%	89 2%	88 1%
Black Level *	0.47	0.4 15%	0.44 6%	0.58 -23%
Contrast	630	1533 143%	1073 70%	750 19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	7.1	2.7 62%	3.4 52%	1.5 79%	2.6 63%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	22.2	5.1 77%	6.6 70%	3.2 86%	5.75 74%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	8	3.7 54%	4.8 40%	2.4 70%	1.5 81%
Gamma	2.204 ^100%	2.3 ^96%	2.41 ^91%	2.2 ^100%	2.319 ^95%
CCT	7992 ^81%	6763 ^96%	7035 ^92%	6546 ^99%	6747 ^96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17629 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

使用出厂设置的色彩模式标准（也可选择暖色和冷色），IPS 面板的色彩还原略微偏离理想线。由于黑色值高达 0.47 cd/m²，它显示出明显的偏蓝，对比度仅为 630:1。肉眼并不能明显看出其色彩准确度较低，但其显示效果略显苍白。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.8 ms rise
22.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22.5 ms rise
46.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 24.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.5 ms).

T65 Max 只在有限的范围内适合户外使用。在阳光直射下，IPS 面板上的内容仍然清晰可辨，但强烈的反光使阅读相当困难。另一方面，这款平板电脑在阴凉处也能很好地使用。

IPS 面板的视角稳定性尚可，但绝对可以做得更好一些。从侧面观看时，屏幕会明显变暗，但不会使色彩失真。

性能 - 配备联发科 Helio G99 的 Teclast T65 Max

联发科联发科 Helio G992022 年推出的联发科 Helio G99 绝不会让 T65 Max 成为性能超群的飞行器，但其 SoC 性能足以满足多媒体使用和网上冲浪的需求。只有在运行非常复杂的应用程序时，这款平板电脑的性能才会达到极限。在这个价位的平板电脑中，有很多都比它快得多。华为华为 MatePad 11.5和联想平板电脑 P12等平板电脑的速度更快。

Geekbench 6.2
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=56, last 2 years)	3194 Points +71%
Huawei MatePad 11.5	2970 Points +59%
Honor Pad 9	2773 Points +49%
Lenovo Tab P12	2422 Points +30%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1864 - 2065, n=10)	1984 Points +6%
Teclast T65 Max	1867 Points
Teclast T60	1596 Points -15%
Single-Core
Huawei MatePad 11.5	1059 Points +49%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=56, last 2 years)	1016 Points +43%
Lenovo Tab P12	958 Points +35%
Honor Pad 9	944 Points +33%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (710 - 738, n=10)	727 Points +2%
Teclast T65 Max	711 Points
Teclast T60	440 Points -38%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Huawei MatePad 11.5	781 Points +47%
Lenovo Tab P12	738 Points +39%
Honor Pad 9	725 Points +37%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=75, last 2 years)	683 Points +29%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (490 - 576, n=16)	546 Points +3%
Teclast T65 Max	531 Points
Teclast T60	361 Points -32%
Multi-Core
Huawei MatePad 11.5	2854 Points +69%
Honor Pad 9	2763 Points +63%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=75, last 2 years)	2430 Points +44%
Lenovo Tab P12	1973 Points +17%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1670 - 1981, n=16)	1830 Points +8%
Teclast T65 Max	1693 Points
Teclast T60	1502 Points -11%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=28, last 2 years)	717146 Points +79%
Honor Pad 9	490448 Points +22%
Teclast T65 Max	401641 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (383511 - 421861, n=4)	399546 Points -1%
Teclast T60	257601 Points -36%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5	556242 Points +73%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=56, last 2 years)	461399 Points +43%
Lenovo Tab P12	442871 Points +37%
Teclast T65 Max	322195 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (229468 - 337968, n=7)	308787 Points -4%
Teclast T60	235075 Points -27%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Lenovo Tab P12	12131 Points +37%
Honor Pad 9	11693 Points +32%
Huawei MatePad 11.5	10389 Points +17%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (8885 - 11027, n=16)	9801 Points +10%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=71, last 2 years)	8972 Points +1%
Teclast T65 Max	8885 Points
Teclast T60	7992 Points -10%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=62, last 2 years)	744 Points +36%
Honor Pad 9	689 Points +26%
Lenovo Tab P12	682 Points +24%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (526 - 602, n=9)	565 Points +3%
Teclast T65 Max	549 Points
Teclast T60	386 Points -30%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Huawei MatePad 11.5	4784 Points +67%
Honor Pad 9	4233 Points +48%
Lenovo Tab P12	4158 Points +45%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=57, last 2 years)	3680 Points +28%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2855 - 3120, n=9)	3006 Points +5%
Teclast T65 Max	2869 Points
Teclast T60	2182 Points -24%
System
Honor Pad 9	10083 Points +70%
Huawei MatePad 11.5	9716 Points +63%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=57, last 2 years)	6632 Points +12%
Lenovo Tab P12	6610 Points +11%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (5261 - 6776, n=9)	6268 Points +5%
Teclast T65 Max	5944 Points
Teclast T60	5151 Points -13%
Memory
Lenovo Tab P12	5807 Points +60%
Huawei MatePad 11.5	4970 Points +37%
Honor Pad 9	4837 Points +34%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10049, n=57, last 2 years)	4366 Points +21%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (3454 - 4152, n=9)	3726 Points +3%
Teclast T65 Max	3619 Points
Teclast T60	3255 Points -10%
Graphics
Huawei MatePad 11.5	7739 Points +183%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=57, last 2 years)	6695 Points +145%
Honor Pad 9	5783 Points +111%
Lenovo Tab P12	4975 Points +82%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2683 - 3002, n=9)	2810 Points +3%
Teclast T65 Max	2738 Points
Teclast T60	1146 Points -58%
Web
Lenovo Tab P12	1566 Points +36%
Huawei MatePad 11.5	1402 Points +22%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1150 - 1325, n=9)	1252 Points +9%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=57, last 2 years)	1217 Points +6%
Honor Pad 9	1192 Points +4%
Teclast T60	1179 Points +3%
Teclast T65 Max	1150 Points

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=44, last 2 years)	4789 Points +441%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (877 - 982, n=7)	908 Points +3%
Teclast T65 Max	885 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5	668 Points -25%
Honor Pad 9	644 Points -27%
Lenovo Tab P12	456 Points -48%
Teclast T60	321 Points -64%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Huawei MatePad 11.5	9027 Points +5%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=55, last 2 years)	8665 Points 0%
Teclast T65 Max	8626 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (6323 - 9695, n=8)	8523 Points -1%
Honor Pad 9	7236 Points -16%
Lenovo Tab P12	5315 Points -38%
Teclast T60	2902 Points -66%

Legend

Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Huawei MatePad 11.5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Teclast T60 UNISOC T616, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

Average Mediatek Helio G99

Average of class Tablet

联发科联发科 Helio G99's ARM Mali-G57 MC2为 T65 Max 提供了稳定的图形处理性能。GFXBench 测试表明，你甚至可以在更高的细节设置下流畅运行游戏。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	825 Points +148%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	611 Points +84%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	611 Points +84%
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	332 Points
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	127 Points -62%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	829 Points +144%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	623 Points +83%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	618 Points +82%
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	340 Points
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	129 Points -62%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3164 Points +213%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2402 Points +138%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2237 Points +121%
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1011 Points
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	476 Points -53%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3157 Points +159%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2367 Points +94%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2156 Points +77%
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1221 Points
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	479 Points -61%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6367 Points +149%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4307 Points +69%
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2554 Points
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	1106 Points -57%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7147 Points +201%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4301 Points +81%
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2375 Points
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	937 Points -61%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4608 Points +33%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4307 Points +24%
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3468 Points
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	2990 Points -14%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	60 fps +20%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps +18%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	50 fps 0%
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	50 fps
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	24 fps -52%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	150 fps +163%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	105 fps +84%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	100 fps +75%
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	57 fps
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	25 fps -56%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps +61%
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	36 fps
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps -3%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	28 fps -22%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	16 fps -56%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	91 fps +139%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	64 fps +68%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62 fps +63%
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	38 fps
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	16 fps -58%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	44 fps +83%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	24 fps 0%
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	24 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps -33%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.5 fps -60%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	65 fps +171%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46 fps +92%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	43 fps +79%
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	24 fps
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.8 fps -59%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps +79%
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11 fps -21%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.9 fps -29%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.7 fps -59%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	38 fps +153%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps +73%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps +53%
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	6.1 fps -59%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps +86%
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.7 fps
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.4 fps -3%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.1 fps -27%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	3.7 fps -62%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps +188%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11.2 fps +90%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps +86%
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.9 fps
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	2.3 fps -61%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	30 fps +100%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	15 fps 0%
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps -27%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.8 fps -61%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps +194%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps +94%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps +81%
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	6.2 fps -61%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.6 fps +204%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4.8 fps +92%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4.7 fps +88%
Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.5 fps
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	0.98 fps -61%

T65 Max 在我们的浏览器基准测试中成绩一般，不得不承认输给了速度更快的平板电脑，如 Honor Pad 9和华为 MatePad 11.5.在网上冲浪时，你应该不会注意到任何性能限制，因为网站很快就能完全加载，然后可以流畅地滚动浏览。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)	101.7 Points +27%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)	88.235 Points +11%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)	86.231 Points +8%
Teclast T65 Max (Chrome 125.0.6422.53)	79.796 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)	75.924 Points -5%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 79.8, n=8)	64.7 Points -19%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)	56.281 Points -29%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=67, last 2 years)	98 Points +13%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)	95 Points +9%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)	91 Points +5%
Teclast T65 Max (Chrome 125.0.6422.53)	87 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)	78 Points -10%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 87, n=8)	67.1 Points -23%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)	60 Points -31%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=51, last 2 years)	144.1 Points +39%
Honor Pad 9	132 Points +27%
Teclast T65 Max (Chrome 125.0.6422.53)	104 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)	99 Points -5%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (80 - 112, n=7)	93.6 Points -10%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (48 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)	110.6 runs/min +55%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)	86.6 runs/min +21%
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)	78 runs/min +9%
Teclast T65 Max (Chrome 125.0.6422.53)	71.3 runs/min
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)	61.5 runs/min -14%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (24.1 - 71.3, n=8)	49 runs/min -31%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)	44.4 runs/min -38%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)	32436 Points +32%
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)	31245 Points +28%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)	30021 Points +23%
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 105178, n=84, last 2 years)	27419 Points +12%
Teclast T65 Max (Chrome 125.0.6422.53)	24489 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 25005, n=16)	20758 Points -15%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)	15304 Points -38%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=70, last 2 years)	3055 ms * -67%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)	2592 ms * -41%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1835 - 2444, n=8)	2106 ms * -15%
Teclast T65 Max (Chrome 125.0.6422.53)	1834.7 ms *
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)	1460.1 ms * +20%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)	1365.8 ms * +26%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)	1321.1 ms * +28%

* ... smaller is better

Teclast 平板电脑采用 UFS 2.2 存储系统，加载时间短，数据吞吐量大，这是此类存储系统的特点。平板电脑 Honor Pad 9采用 UFS 3.1 存储，速度更快。

	Teclast T65 Max	Honor Pad 9	Huawei MatePad 11.5	Lenovo Tab P12	Teclast T60	Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		50%	36%	5%	-70%	-3%	-21%
Sequential Read 256KB	967.58	1921.34 99%	1037.71 7%	956.07 -1%	240.4 -75%	905 ?(482 - 1009, n=27) -6%	884 ?(163 - 3466, n=74, last 2 years) -9%
Sequential Write 256KB	707.27	1222.83 73%	903.32 28%	776.24 10%	230 -67%	696 ?(369 - 913, n=27) -2%	566 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) -20%
Random Read 4KB	201.81	256.06 27%	297.25 47%	241.23 20%	76.4 -62%	220 ?(99.7 - 291, n=27) 9%	171.7 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) -15%
Random Write 4KB	262.04	266.17 2%	418.84 60%	234.58 -10%	67.5 -74%	233 ?(99.2 - 301, n=27) -11%	160 ?(8.23 - 511, n=74, last 2 years) -39%

游戏 - 有限制的游戏

我们使用 Genshin Impact和PUBG Mobile来了解当前游戏在 T65 Max 上的运行情况。我们使用Gamebench测试工具记录了平板电脑的帧率。

T65 Max 在《PUBG Mobile》上的表现非常轻松，在高清设置下，它能以每秒 30 帧的速度非常稳定地运行这款战术射击游戏。在最低设置 "Liquid"下，它甚至能达到几乎连续的 40 帧/秒。

在玩《源氏冲击》这款图形要求更高的游戏时，如果将所有图形细节设置为最低，每秒帧数可以超过 50 帧。不过，在最高细节级别下玩这款游戏几乎没有任何乐趣可言。在这样做的时候，我们注意到帧速率会反复严重下降，《源氏冲击》的平均帧速率只有 20 多帧。

Teclast T65 Max; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.6.0_22174900_22378599: Ø39.7 (28-53)

Teclast T65 Max; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.6.0_22174900_22378599: Ø20.7 (4-31)

Teclast T65 Max; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.2.0: Ø39.7 (38-41)

Teclast T65 Max; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.2.0: Ø29.6 (27-31)

排放 - T65 Max 内有 4 个扬声器

温度

在负载情况下，Teclast T65 Max 几乎不会发热。即使在使用 Burnout 基准进行了一个小时的压力测试后，我们也只注意到最高表面温度为 31.7 °C。使用 3DMark Wild Life 和 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 进行的进一步压力测试显示出非常均匀的进展，这意味着 Teclast 平板电脑即使在负载情况下也不会降低其性能。

Max. Load

Idle


28.7 °C	31.4 °C	31.7 °C
28 °C	28.2 °C	27.1 °C
28.4 °C	27.2 °C	26.6 °C

Maximum: 31.7 °C
Average: 28.6 °C


27.6 °C	33.7 °C	29 °C
27.6 °C	29.6 °C	29.6 °C
27 °C	28.6 °C	28.4 °C

Maximum: 33.7 °C
Average: 29 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.1 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.3 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.19 (6.84-7.35)

Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.1 (14.1-14.1)

Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø18.8 (18.8-18.9)

Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø12.9 (12.9-12.9)

Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.87 (2.85-2.87)

Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.65 (3.65-3.66)

Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.94 (4.94-4.96)

Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.71 (3.7-3.72)

Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.787 (0.742-0.833)

Teclast T65 Max Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.22 (7.21-7.22)

Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.3 (14.2-14.3)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei MatePad 11.5	99.5 (4.94^min - 4.96^max) %
Honor Pad 9	99.5 (3.65^min - 3.66^max) %
Lenovo Tab P12	99.4 (3.7^min - 3.72^max) %
Teclast T60	89.1 (0.742^min - 0.833^max) %
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Tab P12	99.7 (12.9^min - 12.9^max) % +7%
Huawei MatePad 11.5	99.7 (18.8^min - 18.9^max) % +7%
Honor Pad 9	99.7 (14.1^min - 14.1^max) % +7%
Teclast T60	99.4 (2.85^min - 2.87^max) % +7%
Teclast T65 Max	93 (6.84^min - 7.35^max) %
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Teclast T65 Max	99.9 (7.21^min - 7.22^max) %
Honor Pad 9	99.3 (14.2^min - 14.3^max) % -1%

Legend

Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Huawei MatePad 11.5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Teclast T60 UNISOC T616, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

发言人

Teclast 为 T65 Max 配备了四个扬声器。它们位于平板电脑的两个短边，产生的声音偏高音，低音音量不大。不过总的来说，它们的音效在这个价位的平板电脑中还算不错。

外置音频设备可通过 USB-C 端口或蓝牙连接。平板电脑支持最重要的蓝牙编解码器，如 SBC、AAC 和 LDAC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Teclast T65 Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor Pad 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 配有 10,000 毫安时电池的 T65 Max

耗电量

T65 Max 的 10,000 毫安时电池可使用附带的电源以最大 20 瓦的功率充电。在我们的测试中，平板电脑从 0 充到 100 % 需要 2:30 小时。1:43小时后，电池容量达到80%。

在功耗方面，Teclast 大型平板电脑的表现堪称典范，因为它在闲置模式下的功耗仅为 2.6 瓦。在负载情况下，它的耗电量也相当低，平均为 6 瓦。只有 Teclast T60更节能。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.9 / 2.6 / 2.8 Watt
Load	6 / 10.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Teclast T65 Max 10000 mAh	Honor Pad 9 8300 mAh	Huawei MatePad 11.5 7700 mAh	Lenovo Tab P12 10200 mAh	Teclast T60 8000 mAh
Power Consumption		-102%	-39%	-100%	32%
Idle Minimum *	1.9	1.5 21%	1.23 35%	1.91 -1%	1.2 37%
Idle Average *	2.6	8.39 -223%	4.44 -71%	7.94 -205%	1.4 46%
Idle Maximum *	2.8	8.46 -202%	4.49 -60%	8.12 -190%	1.7 39%
Load Average *	6	11.65 -94%	11.2 -87%	10.68 -78%	4.2 30%
Load Maximum *	10.2	11.67 -14%	11.32 -11%	12.69 -24%	9.5 7%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99: Ø8.1 (6.4-10.2)

Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1: Ø6.14 (3.02-10.1)

Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050: Ø6.66 (3.76-11.1)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.02 (6.23-8.36)

Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.94 (4.74-5.39)

Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.8 (5.4-6.3)

Teclast T65 Max Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.65 (2.59-2.79)

Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.03 (3-3.25)

Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.85 (3.8-4.02)

运行时间

作为一款 XXL 平板电脑，T65 Max 的电池续航能力好得令人难以置信。在模拟网上冲浪测试中，这款 12.95 英寸的平板电脑只用了不到 12 小时就再次插上了电源，而在连续循环播放视频时，它的续航时间也差不多，为 11:25 小时。

联想联想平板电脑 P12拥有 12.7 英寸对角线屏幕和 10,200 毫安时电池，在这些方面与 T65 Max 非常相似，但在续航时间上却无法与 T65 Max 相提并论。稍小的 Teclast T60的续航时间甚至比 T65 Max 更长。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		24h 33min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 52min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		11h 25min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 24min

	Teclast T65 Max 10000 mAh	Honor Pad 9 8300 mAh	Huawei MatePad 11.5 7700 mAh	Lenovo Tab P12 10200 mAh	Teclast T60 8000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-7%	14%	-5%	60%
Reader / Idle	1473		1702 16%	1592 8%	3313 125%
H.264	685		874 28%	600 -12%	1145 67%
WiFi v1.3	712	661 -7%	866 22%	675 -5%	1096 54%
Load	264		237 -10%	231 -12%	249 -6%

Pros

+ 大型 16:10 显示屏

+ 无 PWM

+ Android 14

+ DRM Widevine L1

+ 高品质金属外壳

+ 运行时间长

+ 大量存储空间

+ 4G 调制解调器和双卡双待

Cons

- 显示屏昏暗

- 摄像头不佳

- 无指纹传感器

- 更新交付不明确

对 Teclast T65 Max 的评价

Teclast T65 Max 提供了很少见的超大显示屏与低廉价格的完美组合。Android 14 平板电脑的价格已经低于 400 美元，其接近 13 英寸的 16:10 显示屏提供了很大的空间，而且由于获得了 Widevine L1 认证，它还可以播放受拷贝保护的高清流媒体。

此外，其良好的总成绩还得益于纤薄边框的现代设计、稳定的 SoC 性能、相对宽裕的存储空间（256 GB）、预装Android 14 无臃肿软件、4G 调制解调器和良好的电池续航能力。此外，20 瓦的电源可让 T65 Max 在短时间内充满电。

由于配备了 4G 调制解调器，Teclast T65 Max 可以很好地满足上网冲浪和多媒体平板电脑的需求，但由于其显示屏有些暗淡，因此只在有限的范围内适合户外使用。

Teclast 还在其 XXL 平板电脑上做了一两处改进。主要的批评意见包括：T65 Max 的显示屏非常暗，很难在户外使用，而且更新交付不明确。它的摄像头也不是最好的，但在这样一款经济实惠的平板电脑上看到这一点也不足为奇。

Teclast T65 Max 的替代产品是联想平板电脑 P12它的速度更快、屏幕更亮，而且支持笔输入--所有这些都在与 Teclast 平板电脑相同大小的外壳内。平板电脑 Teclast T60也值得一看，而且它的运行时间比 T65 Max 更长。

价格和供应情况

您可以通过制造商的亚马逊店面查看 Teclast 的所有平板电脑。目前，T65 Max 的售价约为 350 美元。

Teclast T65 Max - 2024-05-30 05/30/2024 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

79 / 98 → 81%

Keyboard

73 / 80 → 91%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

45 / 70 → 64%

Weight

80 / 40-88 → 83%

Battery

89%

Display

73%

Games Performance

27 / 78 → 34%

Application Performance

71 / 92 → 77%

Temperature

96%

Noise

100%

Audio

75 / 91 → 83%

Camera

51 / 85 → 60%

Average

73%

81%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 253 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 407754 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Teclast T65 Max 评测--价格低廉的 13 英寸平板电脑

Manuel Masiero, 2024-06- 1 (Update: 2024-06- 1)