联想 ThinkPad P1 G6 评测:80 瓦GeForce RTX 4080 超薄工作站
我们最近评测了 ThinkPad P1 G6配备酷睿 i9-13900H CPU、RTX 2000 GPU 和 1600p IPS 显示屏,发现它是一款极具竞争力的 16 英寸工作站。这次,我们准备看看第二种配置,即酷睿 i7-13800H、GeForce RTX 4080 GPU 和 2400p OLED 显示屏,看看不同的规格会对性能、电池续航时间、内部硬件等产生怎样的影响。
请注意,ThinkPad P1 16 系列不应与 ThinkPad P16 系列P16 系列由更大更重的机型和更快的酷睿 HX 系列组成。
更多联想评测:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90.1 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS i7-13800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" | 3480x2400 | |
91.7 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.8 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 i7-11850H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 17.7 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
91 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 30.23 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
89 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Dell Precision 5000 5680 i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 22.17 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
92.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 28.5 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
尺寸比较
SD 读卡器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
交流
虽然接收速率稳定,但传输速率往往较慢,即使经过重复测试,波动也比预期的要大。
网络摄像头
该设备配置了 500 万像素 1440p 网络摄像头,而我们最初的 RTX 2000 评测中使用的是 200 万像素 1080p 网络摄像头,以获得更清晰的画面。
标配红外和物理快门。
维护
与 ThinkPad P1 G6 RTX 2000 配置相比,RTX 4080 配置集成了更大风扇的扩展冷却解决方案,以适应要求更高的 GPU。遗憾的是,正如下面的对比图片所示,这是以牺牲两个扩展插槽为代价的。
配件和保修
包装盒中除了常见的交流适配器和文件外,没有其他附件。令人失望的是,如果在美国购买,标准有限保修期只有 12 个月,而戴尔Precision 的许多机型的保修期都是 36 个月。
显示屏 - HDR400,支持 DCI-P3 色彩
4K OLED 面板提供了卓越的色彩、更快的响应时间、触摸屏功能,以及比我们之前配置的搭载 RTX 2000 的 2K IPS 面板更高密度的原生分辨率。不过,如下表所示,这些优势的代价是较低的原生刷新率(仅为 60 Hz)和较暗的最大亮度。因此,IPS 面板可能更适合您的应用。遗憾的是,联想没有提供 120 Hz 的 OLED 面板,比如 Vivobook Pro 16X.
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 375.1 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS Samsung ATNA60YV04-0, OLED, 3480x2400, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 LP160UQ1-SPB1, IPS LED, 3840x2400, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 LP160UQ1-SPB1, IPS, 3840x2400, 16" | Dell Precision 5000 5680 Samsung 160YV03, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 AUO87A8, IPS, 3840x2400, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -21% | -5% | -7% | 0% | -5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.8 | 68.1 -32% | 85.7 -14% | 82.9 -17% | 99.9 0% | 98 -2% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 97.5 -2% | 99.4 -1% | 98.9 -1% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.9 | 70.2 -28% | 98.9 1% | 95.9 -2% | 97.5 0% | 86.2 -12% |
Response Times | -583% | -2435% | -2313% | -0% | -530% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.69 ? | 13.7 ? -711% | 55.2 ? -3166% | 45.6 ? -2598% | 1.68 ? 1% | 11.9 ? -604% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1.73 ? | 9.6 ? -455% | 31.2 ? -1703% | 36.8 ? -2027% | 1.77 ? -2% | 9.6 ? -455% |
PWM Frequency | 60 ? | 60 ? 0% | ||||
Screen | 12% | -22% | -27% | -81% | -14% | |
Brightness middle | 375.1 | 521 39% | 630 68% | 601.9 60% | 345.7 -8% | 514.6 37% |
Brightness | 379 | 484 28% | 622 64% | 569 50% | 349 -8% | 495 31% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 89 -9% | 90 -8% | 77 -21% | 98 0% | 90 -8% |
Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.47 | 0.46 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.16 | 1.2 -3% | 2.2 -90% | 2.45 -111% | 3.59 -209% | 2.4 -107% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.94 | 2.5 15% | 5 -70% | 4.46 -52% | 7.02 -139% | 4.86 -65% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.4 -0% | 2.7 -93% | 2.6 -86% | 3.1 -121% | 1 29% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.25 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.3 96% | 2.13 103% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 6325 103% | 6682 97% | 6886 94% | 6805 96% | 6448 101% | 6553 99% |
Contrast | 1447 | 1537 | 1281 | 1119 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 1 | 0.99 | 0.4 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -197% /
-105% | -821% /
-456% | -782% /
-437% | -27% /
-41% | -183% /
-105% |
* ... smaller is better
显示器经过预校准,灰度和色彩 deltaE 平均值分别仅为 1.4 和 1.16。因此,对于大多数用户来说,无需进一步校准。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.73 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.77 ms rise | |
↘ 0.96 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.69 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.89 ms rise | |
↘ 0.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
脉宽调制出现在所有亮度级别上,这也是 OLED 面板的预期效果。我们能检测到从 0 到 57% 亮度的频率为 239 Hz,从 58% 到 100% 亮度的频率为 60 Hz。
性能
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。联想 Vantage 不包含任何专门的电源配置文件,以保持简单。
仅支持 Optimus 1.0,没有高级 Optimus 或 MUX 选项,考虑到高端 RTX 4080 GPU,这有点令人失望。
处理器
处理器 酷睿 i7-13800H的速度仅比 酷睿 i9-13900H即使考虑到任何节流行为。对于绝大多数用户来说,这种差异基本上可以忽略不计。如果买家希望获得更明显的性能提升,不妨考虑配备酷睿 HX 系列处理器的 ThinkPad P16 系列。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
MSI Raider GE68 HX 13VG, i7-13700HX | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
MSI Raider GE68 HX 13VG, i7-13700HX | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H () | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
MSI Raider GE68 HX 13VG, i7-13700HX | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
MSI Raider GE68 HX 13VG, i7-13700HX | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
MSI Raider GE68 HX 13VG, i7-13700HX | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H () | |
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
MSI Raider GE68 HX 13VG, i7-13700HX | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H () | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 -9! |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H () |
系统性能
PCMark 分数与搭载 RTX 2000 的 ThinkPad P1 G6 配置相当,甚至略快于后者,这主要归功于更快的 RTX 4080 GPU。请注意,由于我们的设备在单通道模式下仅配置了一个内存模块,而不是两个,因此内存性能较慢。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 8019 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H () |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-13800H () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
LatencyMon 显示,在打开主页的多个浏览器标签页时存在 DPC 问题,在播放一分钟长的 4K60 视频时有 75 帧掉帧。鉴于该机型的价格和专业性,后者尤其令人失望。这还表明存在驱动程序问题或后台应用程序处理不当,可能会中断焦点窗口。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试机配备了 KXG8AZNV1T02而不是原来 ThinkPad P1 G6 上的 SK Hynix PC711。整体性能普遍较慢,尤其是在写入数据时,但读取速率仍然非常出色,只是在大约 3 分钟的压力后略有节流。
请注意,ThinkPad P1 G6 的某些配置可以支持一个以上的内置 M.2 SSD。不过,这次评测的配置只能支持一个硬盘。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
Nvidia 控制面板列出的最大显卡功耗为 105 W。但实际上,根据 GPU-Z 的数据,我们的最大功耗仅为 80 W。因此,整体性能比我们数据库中采用相同移动GeForce RTX 4080 GPU 的普通笔记本电脑要慢 15% 到 20%,因为这种特殊的 GPU 通常在更高的功率上限下运行。
无论如何,除了 Specviewperf Siemens NX 和 Medical 测试之外,图形性能在大多数基准测试中仍然远远领先于 RTX 2000。为了获得更快的性能,联想提供了最高配置的RTX 5000。
在平衡模式而不是性能模式下运行会影响 GPU 性能,而 CPU 基本上不受影响,如下表Fire Strike 结果所示。
电源配置文件 | 物理分数 | 图形得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 29543 | 33402 | 12423 |
平衡模式 | 30978 (-0%) | 25806 (-23%) | 9616 (-23%) |
电池电量 | 21163 (-28%) | 18870 (-44%) | 4960 (-60%) |
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 -34! | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 -1! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 -1! | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU -1! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS -1! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE -17! | |
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 -17! | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 -2! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 -11! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) -36! | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G -36! |
3DMark 11 Performance | 38087 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 28105 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 13863 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
F1 22 | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (72.3 - 124.2, n=15) | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (55.4 - 79, n=13) | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (25.8 - 39.8, n=10) | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (112.9 - 167.1, n=9) | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
2560x1440 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (85 - 114.8, n=9) | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
3840x2160 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (46.4 - 60.9, n=9) | |
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS |
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (111.8 - 181.2, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (88.3 - 129.3, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
3840x2160 Ultra Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (48.8 - 68.4, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (83.9 - 127.1, n=12) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (56.2 - 86.3, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
3840x2160 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (25.8 - 39.8, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
3840x2160 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset + DLSS Quality + FG | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (48.4 - 53.7, n=3) |
闲置时的帧速率 Witcher 3一直保持稳定,只有一次性能下降到 90 FPS,如下图所示。突然下降的原因可能是后台应用程序处理不当。
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 120.3 | 106.4 | 120.3 | ||||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 130.4 | 78.5 | |||||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 191.8 | 169 | 155.8 | 147.3 | 144.6 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 135.3 | 102.6 | 61.5 | ||||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 171.1 | 150.8 | 118.6 | 103 | |||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 149 | 126 | 71 | ||||
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 118.6 | 85 | 46.4 | ||||
F1 22 (2022) | 202 | 81.5 | 55.4 | 29.7 | |||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 124.8 | 88.7 | 48.8 | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 103.8 | 90.9 | 59.9 | 52.5 | 25.8 |
排放量
系统噪音
在运行要求较高的负载时,风扇噪音比搭载 RTX 2000 的配置更大。例如,在运行Witcher 3 时,风扇噪音在 47 到 55 dB(A)之间,而较低配置的风扇噪音仅为 41 到 48 dB(A)。除此之外,在运行浏览器或视频流等较简单的进程时,系统能出色地长时间保持安静。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 22.5 / 22.5 / 22.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 28.7 / 54.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.5 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13800H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB | Dell Precision 5000 5680 NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, 2x SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N RAID 0 | HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -11% | -9% | -2% | -5% | -7% | |
off / environment * | 22.5 | 24.5 -9% | 23.8 -6% | 23.1 -3% | 22.8 -1% | 22.9 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 22.5 | 24.5 -9% | 23.8 -6% | 23.1 -3% | 23 -2% | 22.9 -2% |
Idle Average * | 22.5 | 24.5 -9% | 23.8 -6% | 23.1 -3% | 23 -2% | 22.9 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 22.5 | 24.5 -9% | 28.3 -26% | 23.1 -3% | 23 -2% | 28.5 -27% |
Load Average * | 28.7 | 48 -67% | 38.6 -34% | 28.9 -1% | 37.2 -30% | 40.6 -41% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.5 | 40.7 14% | 47.4 -0% | 51.6 -9% | 51 -7% | 44.1 7% |
Load Maximum * | 54.4 | 48 12% | 47.4 13% | 51.4 6% | 51 6% | 45.8 16% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
即使只是在桌面上空转,表面温度也会相当高,因为风扇在引入更高的负载之前往往会很慵懒。键盘和底面的热点温度分别为 45°C 和 49°C,而同类竞争产品的热点温度分别为 51°C 和 32°C。 戴尔Precision 5680.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-2.9 °C / -5.2 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS Intel Core i7-13800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU | Dell Precision 5000 5680 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 1% | -1% | -4% | 3% | -2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42 | 47.1 -12% | 51 -21% | 44.8 -7% | 50.2 -20% | 44.8 -7% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45.2 | 56.5 -25% | 53.5 -18% | 49.8 -10% | 32 29% | 50 -11% |
Idle Upper Side * | 33 | 28.1 15% | 28.8 13% | 30.6 7% | 37.4 -13% | 34.4 -4% |
Idle Bottom * | 37 | 27.6 25% | 29.3 21% | 38.6 -4% | 31.2 16% | 31.8 14% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当处于 Prime95 压力下时,CPU 会在最初几秒钟内将主频提升至 4.1 GHz,功耗达到 111 W,然后下降并稳定在 75 W 和 2.5 至 3.1 GHz 的范围内。最值得注意的是,核心温度稳定在 97 摄氏度,这表明处理器正在将散热解决方案推向极限,以最大限度地发挥 Turbo Boost 的潜力。
如果运行在平衡模式而不是上述的性能模式,图形性能会降低。例如,在性能模式下运行时,GPU 将稳定在 1890 MHz、79 W 和 77 C。 Witcher 3相比,在平衡模式下仅为 1470 MHz、52 W 和 67 C。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度(°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 53 | 43 |
Prime95 压力 | -- | -- | 2.5 - 3.1 | 97 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | ~2.1 - 3.1 | ~1071 | 86 | 72 |
Witcher 3 压力(平衡模式) | 0.8 | 1470 | 69 | 67 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能模式) | ~0.8 | 1890 | 79 | 77 |
发言人
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
我们的测试设备通常比搭载较少 RTX 2000 的配置要求更高,这也是下一节中电池续航时间较短的原因。运行 Witcher 3来表示苛刻的负载,例如,将多消耗 37% 的电量。
当 CPU 和 GPU 的使用率均为 100% 时,我们可以记录到中等大小(约 17 x 8.8 x 2.5 厘米)的 230 W AC 适配器的最大耗电量为 197 W。
Off / Standby | 0.06 / 1.4 Watt |
Idle | 8 / 9.5 / 23.7 Watt |
Load |
97.2 / 197.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS i7-13800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02, OLED, 3480x2400, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 i7-11850H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS LED, 3840x2400, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 2TB, IPS, 3840x2400, 16" | Dell Precision 5000 5680 i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 2x SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N RAID 0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 3840x2400, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 5% | -15% | -51% | 0% | -46% | |
Idle Minimum * | 8 | 8.3 -4% | 8.1 -1% | 7.5 6% | 8 -0% | 15.3 -91% |
Idle Average * | 9.5 | 14.5 -53% | 20.2 -113% | 20.1 -112% | 10.4 -9% | 18.2 -92% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.7 | 15.3 35% | 21.9 8% | 40 -69% | 30.5 -29% | 28 -18% |
Load Average * | 97.2 | 91.8 6% | 88.2 9% | 137 -41% | 75.4 22% | 137.9 -42% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 144 | 104.7 27% | 149 -3% | 208 -44% | 134 7% | 189.4 -32% |
Load Maximum * | 197.2 | 164.5 17% | 170.6 13% | 285.9 -45% | 175 11% | 202 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
由于采用了要求更高的 OLED 显示屏和更快的 GPU,运行时间比搭载 RTX 2000 的配置明显缩短了一半以上。即使在平衡功耗模式下,我们的实际 WLAN 浏览时间也只有 4 个多小时。
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS i7-13800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 i7-11850H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, 94 Wh | Dell Precision 5000 5680 i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 98 Wh | HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 95 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 125% | 65% | 39% | 135% | 73% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 252 | 567 125% | 417 65% | 350 39% | 592 135% | 435 73% |
H.264 | 674 | 429 | ||||
Load | 67 | 74 | 101 | |||
Reader / Idle | 1072 |
Pros
Cons
结论:更快的性能却牺牲了电池寿命
ThinkPad P1 G6 提供多种配置级别,包括 IPS、OLED、酷睿 i7、酷睿 i9 以及GeForce RTX 或 RTX Ada GPU 选项。根据我们对两种截然不同配置的体验,两种处理器选项(酷睿 i7-13800H 与酷睿 i9-13900H)之间的差异微乎其微,这意味着选择更便宜的酷睿 i7 并在其他地方多花些钱是明智之举。
至于显示屏,1600p IPS 和 2400p OLED 孰优孰劣还真不好说。前者提供更快的原生刷新率和更亮的最大亮度,后者则提供触摸屏、DCI-P3 色彩、最小鬼影和 HDR400 支持。未来的机型可能会采用 120 Hz OLED 面板,这种面板在以下机型上越来越常见 华硕 VivoBook.
ThinkPad P1 G6 的单位体积性能很高,但代价是电池续航时间、风扇噪音以及与较低配置相比升级有限。
配置更快的 GPU(如 RTX 5000 或 RTX 4080)而不是 RTX 2000 会带来一些不利因素。内部存储升级变得更加有限,风扇噪音在负载情况下会变得更大,电池寿命也会受到明显影响。此外,我们还不得不提到视频流媒体时的帧速率卡顿以及相对较低的 80 W TGP 上限。即便如此,ThinkPad P1 G6 仍是同尺寸、同重量移动工作站中速度最快的产品之一。要想获得更快的速度,你必须考虑体积更大的 ThinkPad P16 系列而非 ThinkPad P16 系列。
价格和供应情况
目前,联想已经开始发售多款配置的 ThinkPad P1 G6,基础版酷睿 i7/RTX A1000/1200p IPS 配置的起价为 1680 美元,如果配置 RTX 4080,价格则高达 2700 美元或更高。
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS
- 12/08/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.