我们测试了 Vivobook S 15 OLED几个月前，我们测试了配备高通 Snapdragon X Elite 处理器的 Vivobook S 15 OLED。它是一款不错的日常电脑，拥有出色的 OLED 屏幕。除了 ARM 架构的局限性和相关的兼容性问题外，价格也是个大问题，因为它的零售价为 1,269.99 美元，与采用英特尔/AMD 处理器的同类产品相当（甚至更高）。
为了配合搭载 8 个 CPU 核心的骁龙 X Plus 新机型的上市，华硕将 Vivobook S 15 的相应配置推向市场。不过，价格跳水并没有想象中那么大，建议零售价为 1,149 欧元（约合 1,270 美元）。除处理器外，其他配置完全相同，都是高分辨率 120 Hz OLED 屏幕、16 GB LPDDR5x-8448 内存和 512 GB SSD。但是，使用新的骁龙芯片需要做出哪些妥协，性能是否仍能满足大多数日常任务的需要？
在这篇评测中，我们将重点关注新款骁龙 X Plus 的性能以及排放量和电池续航时间。在其他部分，与之前测试过的 Vivobook S 15 OLED 没有任何区别，因此我们建议您参阅我们对 Snapdragon S 15 OLED 的评测，了解有关外壳、功能、输入设备和显示屏的更多信息。 我们对 Snapdragon X Elite 变体的测试报告了解更多信息。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.7 % | v8 | 09 / 2024 | Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 15.60" | 2880x1620 | |
| 83.3 % | v8 | 06 / 2024 | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 15.60" | 2880x1620 | |
| 84.7 % | v8 | 08 / 2024 | SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.30" | 2560x1600 | |
| 80.2 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 1.5 kg | 12.3 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 76.7 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.6 kg | 17.8 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
| 89.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.9 kg | 15.9 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 | |
| 87.9 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.9 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击 这里.
箱子和设备
除了新的骁龙贴纸外，两个版本的 Vivobook S 15 在外壳和功能方面没有任何区别。
性能 - 配备 8 核的骁龙 X Plus
高通公司总共推出了三种新的骁龙 X Plus 型号，而 Vivobook S 15 配备的是速度最慢的型号。型号 X1P-42-100提供八个内核，配备 16GB LPDDR5x-8448 内存，但不能升级。配备 45 TOPS 的 NPU 与其他骁龙 X 处理器相同。
测试条件
华硕在预装的 MyAsus 应用程序中提供了各种能耗配置文件，我们在下表列出了这些配置文件。TDP 规格来自制造商，其中纯 CPU 的份额为四舍五入值，因为该值无法单独读出。目前骁龙 X 处理器的 TDP 规格除处理器外，还包括控制器和内存。我们使用默认配置文件 "标准 "进行了以下基准测试和测量。性能配置文件只提供更好的多核性能。此外还有全速模式，但只能提高风扇的转速。
| 风扇模式 | TDP SoC | TDP CPU | CB 2024 Multi | 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | max.风扇容量 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whisper | 20 瓦 | ~15 瓦 | 644 点 | 1,143 点 | 29.7 dB(A) |
| 标准 | 25 瓦 | ~20 瓦 | 661 点 | 1,147 点 | 29.7 dB(A) |
| 功率 | 35 瓦 | ~25 瓦 | 759 点 | 1,145 点 | 42.8 dB(A) |
处理器 - X1P-42-100
我们已经测试了新的 X1P-42-100在我们的 分析文章中进行了详细测试。基本上，这里只使用了最高主频为 3.2 GHz 的性能集群（8 个内核），而一个活动内核的主频可达 3.4 GHz。这里没有安装价格更高的骁龙 SoC 的效率集群。
由于时钟频率相同，基准测试中的单核性能与 骁龙 X Elite(X1E-78-100）的性能不相上下，也非常可观。这也让最小的骁龙处理器领先于 AMD 的 Zen4 芯片和英特尔的 Meteor Lake CPU。不过，目前的 AMD Zen 5 处理器速度稍快。在本地多核测试中，小型骁龙 X Plus 的性能明显优于采用骁龙 X Elite 或 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H. 我们的分析我们的分析还显示，AMD 在这方面也处于领先地位。
我们在所有设备上进行的其他 CPU 基准测试都是在 ARM 笔记本电脑上模拟进行的。Vivobook S 15 在这里的性能同样很弱，实际上在我们的对比组中总是排在最后一位。至少，在连续负载和电池模式下的性能几乎相同。更多 CPU 基准测试请参见 技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (6442 - 8284, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1104 - 1128, n=4) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2361 - 3097, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (406 - 425, n=4) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1383 - 1556, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (207 - 215, n=4) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (399 - 571, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (29238 - 32811, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (4087 - 4675, n=4) | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 25760, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (6604 - 11438, n=5) | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2255 - 2437, n=4) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (4.6 - 6.02, n=4) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (59 - 62.7, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (0.728 - 0.774, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (4739 - 6185, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (14528 - 17585, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2191 - 2614, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (44346 - 48532, n=4) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1240 - 1502, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (8416 - 9929, n=4) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (37646 - 45232, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (478 - 521, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2262 - 3399, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (31839 - 32139, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
系统性能
合成系统基准测试的结果喜忧参半：小型 Snapdragon 芯片在跨系统 CrossMark 测试中的表现相当微弱，但在浏览器测试中的表现却截然不同。实际上，在大多数情况下，你不会注意到与速度更快的 Snapdragon 芯片相比有什么不同，Windows 体验非常流畅，反应也很灵敏。不过，我们也遇到过系统出现轻微卡顿或停顿的情况，例如从待机状态唤醒或在设置中。不过，只要使用本机应用程序，性能应该不会有问题。我们已经详细讨论过 x86 应用程序和外设的问题，，微软也指出了其局限性。.
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1154 - 1463, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1100 - 1284, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1267 - 1630, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1067 - 1563, n=4) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (129.9 - 407, n=4) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (130.3 - 283, n=4) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (468 - 1145, n=4) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
* ... smaller is better
» No benchmarks for this notebook found!
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (61258 - 62430, n=4) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (123557 - 127282, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (46128 - 47845, n=4) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (6.9 - 7.4, n=3) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
由于 LatencyMon 应用程序无法工作，我们无法进行标准的延迟测试。不过，我们至少可以说，在播放 4K YouTube 视频时没有出现丢帧现象。
大容量存储器
测试设备中安装的是 512 GB 版本的 WD SN740。它是一款 M.2 2280 SSD，具有 PCIe 4.0 连接和稳定的传输速率。此外，即使在长时间负载的情况下，其性能也能保持完全稳定。初始启动后，用户可使用 426 GB 的容量。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Contionuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡 - Adreno X1-45
新的 8 核骁龙 X Plus 机型配备了性能较弱的 Adreno X1-45有两种性能级别（2.1 或 1.7 TFLOPS）可供选择。较小的 X1P-42-100 配备的是 1.7 TFLOPS 的较慢版本，GPU 最高时钟频率为 1.107 GHz。基本上，其性能比 3.8 TFLOPS 的 Adreno X1-85 低 50%，在 GPU 基准测试中，X1-45 也只能排在最后一位。
这对日常使用意味着什么？实际上，一开始并没有什么意义，因为其性能仍然足以完成基本任务，包括播放高分辨率视频。由于兼容性问题，骁龙 X Elite 芯片本来就存在游戏问题，而新的骁龙 X Plus 和 X1-45 GPU 则进一步加剧了这一问题。即使是在低细节的情况下流畅运行旧版游戏，我们有时也会遇到明显的掉帧现象，这就是游戏不好玩的原因。
至少，在长时间负载和电池模式下，图形性能仍能保持稳定。更多 GPU 基准测试 这里.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4438 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 19040 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3691 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 981 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 232 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 1147 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 95.9 | 91.2 | 33 | 14 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 68 | 41 | 22 | 11 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 80.3 | 66 | 55.2 | 47.9 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 37.1 | 15.1 | 10 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 37 | 21 | 19 | 17 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 83 | 30 | 23 | 19 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 33.7 | 38.3 | 22.9 | 16.2 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 13.1 | 10.9 | 9.5 | 9.1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 14.4 | 11.2 | 9.5 | 8.26 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
新款骁龙 X Plus 的性能明显降低，这对风扇产生了积极影响，因为散热工作大大减少，Vivobook S 15 整体上仍然非常安静。在日常使用中，你几乎听不到风扇的声音。这与速度更快的 Snapdragon X Elite 机型相比无疑是一大优势，后者即使在耳语模式下声音也略大（约 33 dB(A)）。在游戏或压力测试时，我们在标准风扇模式下测得的噪音也只有 29.7 dB(A)（同样适用于耳语模式）。在性能模式下，噪音明显增大，为 42.8 dB(A)，而全速模式下的最大噪音则高达 51.2 dB(A)。测试设备上没有其他电子噪音。
| 风扇模式 | 赛博朋克 2077 | 压力测试 |
|---|---|---|
| 耳语 | 29.7 dB(A) | 29.7 dB(A) |
| 标准 | 29.7 dB(A) | 29.7 dB(A) |
| 功率 | 32.3 dB(A) | 42.8 dB(A) |
| 全速 | 32.3 dB(A) | 51.2 dB(A) |
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23.7 / 23.7 / 23.7 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 23.7 / 29.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.7 dB(A) | ||
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01 | Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -16% | -21% | -8% | -33% | -14% | -27% | |
| off / environment * | 23.7 | 24.3 -3% | 24.7 -4% | 24.6 -4% | 25 -5% | 24.4 -3% | 24.1 -2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.7 | 24.3 -3% | 24.7 -4% | 24.6 -4% | 26 -10% | 24.4 -3% | 24.1 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 23.7 | 24.3 -3% | 24.7 -4% | 24.6 -4% | 27 -14% | 24.4 -3% | 24.1 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.7 | 26.2 -11% | 28.9 -22% | 24.6 -4% | 28 -18% | 24.4 -3% | 28.2 -19% |
| Load Average * | 23.7 | 32.5 -37% | 32.7 -38% | 28.1 -19% | 43 -81% | 32 -35% | 44.4 -87% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 29.7 | 35.2 -19% | 40.4 -36% | 32.4 -9% | 42 -41% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 29.7 | 39.8 -34% | 40.4 -36% | 32.4 -9% | 48 -62% | 39.7 -34% | 44.4 -49% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 30.6 | 36.5 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Vivobook S 15 的外壳温度完全没有问题。在怠速运行和进行简单操作时，机身几乎不会发热，在压力测试中也可以将设备放在大腿上。最高温度为 49.9 °C 的热点位于后部中间区域的底部，这里不应该有皮肤接触。总体而言，负载情况下的温度也比速度更快的 骁龙 X 精英版.使用键盘时没有任何限制。
在 CPU/GPU 综合负载的压力测试中，显卡始终以 1,107 MHz 的全速运行，而 CPU 内核则很快达到 2.7 GHz。芯片温度为 70 °C。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.9 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.7 °C / 85.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.9 °C / -1.7 F).
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 1% | -5% | 4% | -17% | 6% | 15% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41.8 | 43.6 -4% | 41.7 -0% | 44.3 -6% | 55 -32% | 40.3 4% | 36.3 13% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 49.9 | 53.1 -6% | 49.6 1% | 51.6 -3% | 55 -10% | 45.9 8% | 39.1 22% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28.8 | 26.7 7% | 31.1 -8% | 25.1 13% | 32 -11% | 26.3 9% | 24.9 14% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29.1 | 27.2 7% | 33.1 -14% | 25.8 11% | 33 -13% | 27.9 4% | 26.1 10% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
Vivobook S 15 的能耗明显低于骁龙 X 精英版，尤其是在负载情况下 骁龙 X 精英版由于功耗限制较低，这并不奇怪。空闲时也略显经济。所提供的 65 瓦电源完全够用。
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.74 Watt |
| Idle | 4.8 / 5.9 / 7 Watt |
| Load |
15.1 / 54.9 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01 | Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -41% | -167% | -32% | -120% | -125% | -95% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.8 | 4.4 8% | 7.7 -60% | 4.2 12% | 7 -46% | 4.2 12% | 3.5 27% |
| Idle Average * | 5.9 | 6.2 -5% | 13.2 -124% | 5.6 5% | 10 -69% | 11.6 -97% | 9.6 -63% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7 | 7.5 -7% | 13.7 -96% | 7.8 -11% | 19 -171% | 12.3 -76% | 9.9 -41% |
| Load Average * | 15.1 | 33.6 -123% | 76.2 -405% | 28.3 -87% | 52 -244% | 61.9 -310% | 62.7 -315% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 23.2 | 39 -68% | 76.7 -231% | 38.8 -67% | 53.2 -129% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 23.3 | 38.9 -67% | 72.7 -212% | 38.2 -64% | 49.2 -111% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 54.9 | 69.3 -26% | 78.1 -42% | 61.9 -13% | 95 -73% | 140.6 -156% | 101.2 -84% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 29.9 | 57 | 55.8 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
Power consumption with the external Monitor
电池寿命
在电池续航时间方面，搭载全新骁龙 X Plus 的 Vivobook S 15 在满负荷状态下的续航时间明显长于 X-Elite 机型。在无线局域网测试和 150 cd/m² 下的视频测试中，它的表现都略逊一筹。测试结果分别为 12.5 小时和 14.5 小时，总体来说还是不错的，但英特尔的一些竞争对手提供了更长的运行时间。
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, 70 Wh | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 70 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99.9 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 61.8 Wh | Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 84 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -9% | -13% | -20% | -41% | 23% | -14% | -16% | |
| H.264 | 875 | 885 1% | 729 -17% | 879 0% | 1308 49% | 957 9% | 847 ? -3% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 745 | 783 5% | 625 -16% | 443 -41% | 436 -41% | 983 32% | 756 1% | 640 ? -14% |
| Load | 142 | 97 -32% | 134 -6% | 117 -18% | 124 -13% | 68 -52% | 97.1 ? -32% |
Pros
Cons
结论--搭载小型骁龙处理器的 Vivobook S 15 太贵了
基本上，新的 8 核 Snapdragon X Plus 机型的概念是好的，因为只要你不想玩游戏，它们仍能以明显较低的价格为日常任务提供足够的性能。在几乎所有的性能比较中，X1P-42-100 都输给了竞争对手，但它本身仍然是一款反应灵敏的设备。最大的优势是风扇活动和整体噪音水平明显降低。许多用户可能永远也听不到风扇的声音。除此以外，当然还有配备充足连接的良好机箱、良好的输入设备和非常出色的 120 Hz OLED 面板。
新的 8 核骁龙 X Plus 显然比骁龙 X Elite 慢，但风扇也更安静。不过，1149 欧元的价格实在太高了。
当然必须考虑到 ARM Windows 版本的局限性，但最大的问题还是新款 Vivobook S 15 的价格。其建议零售价为 1149 欧元，远高于骁龙 X Plus 新机型的预期。更糟糕的是，配备 16GB 内存和更大的 1 TB SSD 的骁龙 X 精英版 Vivobook 目前在网上的售价为 1,199 欧元。这给新机型带来了麻烦，我们也认为价格过高。
价格和供应情况
配备骁龙 X Plus 的新款华硕 Vivobook S 15 OLED 现在可以直接从华硕订购，价格为 1,149 欧元。.
注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击 这里.
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core
- 09/07/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
