Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar
我们测试了 Vivobook S 15 OLED几个月前，我们测试了配备高通 Snapdragon X Elite 处理器的 Vivobook S 15 OLED。它是一款不错的日常电脑，拥有出色的 OLED 屏幕。除了 ARM 架构的局限性和相关的兼容性问题外，价格也是个大问题，因为它的零售价为 1,269.99 美元，与采用英特尔/AMD 处理器的同类产品相当（甚至更高）。
为了配合搭载 8 个 CPU 核心的骁龙 X Plus 新机型的上市，华硕将 Vivobook S 15 的相应配置推向市场。不过，价格跳水并没有想象中那么大，建议零售价为 1,149 欧元（约合 1,270 美元）。除处理器外，其他配置完全相同，都是高分辨率 120 Hz OLED 屏幕、16 GB LPDDR5x-8448 内存和 512 GB SSD。但是，使用新的骁龙芯片需要做出哪些妥协，性能是否仍能满足大多数日常任务的需要？
在这篇评测中，我们将重点关注新款骁龙 X Plus 的性能以及排放量和电池续航时间。在其他部分，与之前测试过的 Vivobook S 15 OLED 没有任何区别，因此我们建议您参阅我们对 Snapdragon S 15 OLED 的评测，了解有关外壳、功能、输入设备和显示屏的更多信息。 我们对 Snapdragon X Elite 变体的测试报告了解更多信息。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.7 % | v8 | 09/2024 | Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 15.60" | 2880x1620 | |
| 83.3 % | v8 | 06/2024 | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 15.60" | 2880x1620 | |
| 84.7 % | v8 | 08/2024 | SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.30" | 2560x1600 | |
| 80.2 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 1.5 kg | 12.3 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 76.7 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.6 kg | 17.8 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
| 89.7 % | v7 (old) | 04/2024 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.9 kg | 15.9 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 | |
| 87.9 % | v7 (old) | 05/2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.9 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击 这里.
箱子和设备
除了新的骁龙贴纸外，两个版本的 Vivobook S 15 在外壳和功能方面没有任何区别。
性能 - 配备 8 核的骁龙 X Plus
高通公司总共推出了三种新的骁龙 X Plus 型号，而 Vivobook S 15 配备的是速度最慢的型号。型号 X1P-42-100提供八个内核，配备 16GB LPDDR5x-8448 内存，但不能升级。配备 45 TOPS 的 NPU 与其他骁龙 X 处理器相同。
测试条件
华硕在预装的 MyAsus 应用程序中提供了各种能耗配置文件，我们在下表列出了这些配置文件。TDP 规格来自制造商，其中纯 CPU 的份额为四舍五入值，因为该值无法单独读出。目前骁龙 X 处理器的 TDP 规格除处理器外，还包括控制器和内存。我们使用默认配置文件 "标准 "进行了以下基准测试和测量。性能配置文件只提供更好的多核性能。此外还有全速模式，但只能提高风扇的转速。
| 风扇模式 | TDP SoC | TDP CPU | CB 2024 Multi | 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | max.风扇容量 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whisper | 20 瓦 | ~15 瓦 | 644 点 | 1,143 点 | 29.7 dB(A) |
| 标准 | 25 瓦 | ~20 瓦 | 661 点 | 1,147 点 | 29.7 dB(A) |
| 功率 | 35 瓦 | ~25 瓦 | 759 点 | 1,145 点 | 42.8 dB(A) |
处理器 - X1P-42-100
我们已经测试了新的 X1P-42-100在我们的 分析文章中进行了详细测试。基本上，这里只使用了最高主频为 3.2 GHz 的性能集群（8 个内核），而一个活动内核的主频可达 3.4 GHz。这里没有安装价格更高的骁龙 SoC 的效率集群。
由于时钟频率相同，基准测试中的单核性能与 骁龙 X Elite(X1E-78-100）的性能不相上下，也非常可观。这也让最小的骁龙处理器领先于 AMD 的 Zen4 芯片和英特尔的 Meteor Lake CPU。不过，目前的 AMD Zen 5 处理器速度稍快。在本地多核测试中，小型骁龙 X Plus 的性能明显优于采用骁龙 X Elite 或 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H. 我们的分析我们的分析还显示，AMD 在这方面也处于领先地位。
我们在所有设备上进行的其他 CPU 基准测试都是在 ARM 笔记本电脑上模拟进行的。Vivobook S 15 在这里的性能同样很弱，实际上在我们的对比组中总是排在最后一位。至少，在连续负载和电池模式下的性能几乎相同。更多 CPU 基准测试请参见 技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4624 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (6442 - 7144, n=2) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2110, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1109 - 1128, n=2) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1795 - 11768, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2361 - 2681, n=2) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (341 - 812, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (406 - 425, n=2) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1057 - 4703, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1383 - 1419, n=2) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 310, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (207 - 207, n=2) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (466 - 571, n=2) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (27677 - 119900, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (30689 - 31010, n=2) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7163, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (4498 - 4561, n=2) | |
| Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 21264, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (10833 - 11400, n=3) | |
| Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3157, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2353 - 2437, n=2) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (4.6 - 5.26, n=2) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (60.1 - 62.7, n=2) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (0.728 - 0.741, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3826 - 0.947, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (4739 - 5121, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (14528 - 14589, n=2) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6681, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2191 - 2192, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 134321, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (44346 - 48532, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1240 - 1256, n=2) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (8416 - 9903, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (37646 - 37747, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (302 - 1901, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (478 - 483, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2262 - 2759, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (31867 - 31890, n=2) | |
系统性能
合成系统基准测试的结果喜忧参半：小型 Snapdragon 芯片在跨系统 CrossMark 测试中的表现相当微弱，但在浏览器测试中的表现却截然不同。实际上，在大多数情况下，你不会注意到与速度更快的 Snapdragon 芯片相比有什么不同，Windows 体验非常流畅，反应也很灵敏。不过，我们也遇到过系统出现轻微卡顿或停顿的情况，例如从待机状态唤醒或在设置中。不过，只要使用本机应用程序，性能应该不会有问题。我们已经详细讨论过 x86 应用程序和外设的问题，，微软也指出了其局限性。.
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2146, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1168 - 1175, n=2) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1100 - 1108, n=2) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2564, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1269 - 1287, n=2) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1068 - 1087, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (405 - 407, n=2) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 476, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (280 - 283, n=2) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 348, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (363 - 1016, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (468 - 481, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
* ... smaller is better
» No benchmarks for this notebook found!
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 94300, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (61342 - 62430, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (124236 - 125359, n=2) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 100507, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (46128 - 46472, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (7 - 7.4, n=2) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
由于 LatencyMon 应用程序无法工作，我们无法进行标准的延迟测试。不过，我们至少可以说，在播放 4K YouTube 视频时没有出现丢帧现象。
大容量存储器
测试设备中安装的是 512 GB 版本的 WD SN740。它是一款 M.2 2280 SSD，具有 PCIe 4.0 连接和稳定的传输速率。此外，即使在长时间负载的情况下，其性能也能保持完全稳定。初始启动后，用户可使用 426 GB 的容量。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Contionuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡 - Adreno X1-45
新的 8 核骁龙 X Plus 机型配备了性能较弱的 Adreno X1-45有两种性能级别（2.1 或 1.7 TFLOPS）可供选择。较小的 X1P-42-100 配备的是 1.7 TFLOPS 的较慢版本，GPU 最高时钟频率为 1.107 GHz。基本上，其性能比 3.8 TFLOPS 的 Adreno X1-85 低 50%，在 GPU 基准测试中，X1-45 也只能排在最后一位。
这对日常使用意味着什么？实际上，一开始并没有什么意义，因为其性能仍然足以完成基本任务，包括播放高分辨率视频。由于兼容性问题，骁龙 X Elite 芯片本来就存在游戏问题，而新的骁龙 X Plus 和 X1-45 GPU 则进一步加剧了这一问题。即使是在低细节的情况下流畅运行旧版游戏，我们有时也会遇到明显的掉帧现象，这就是游戏不好玩的原因。
至少，在长时间负载和电池模式下，图形性能仍能保持稳定。更多 GPU 基准测试 这里.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4438 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 19040 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3691 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 981 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 232 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 1147 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 123, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Medion S10 OLED | |
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
| GTA V (2015) | 95.9 | 91.2 | 33 | 14 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 68 | 41 | 22 | 11 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 80.3 | 66 | 55.2 | 47.9 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 37.1 | 15.1 | 10 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 37 | 21 | 19 | 17 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 83 | 30 | 23 | 19 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 33.7 | 38.3 | 22.9 | 16.2 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 13.1 | 10.9 | 9.5 | 9.1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 14.4 | 11.2 | 9.5 | 8.26 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
新款骁龙 X Plus 的性能明显降低，这对风扇产生了积极影响，因为散热工作大大减少，Vivobook S 15 整体上仍然非常安静。在日常使用中，你几乎听不到风扇的声音。这与速度更快的 Snapdragon X Elite 机型相比无疑是一大优势，后者即使在耳语模式下声音也略大（约 33 dB(A)）。在游戏或压力测试时，我们在标准风扇模式下测得的噪音也只有 29.7 dB(A)（同样适用于耳语模式）。在性能模式下，噪音明显增大，为 42.8 dB(A)，而全速模式下的最大噪音则高达 51.2 dB(A)。测试设备上没有其他电子噪音。
| 风扇模式 | 赛博朋克 2077 | 压力测试 |
|---|---|---|
| 耳语 | 29.7 dB(A) | 29.7 dB(A) |
| 标准 | 29.7 dB(A) | 29.7 dB(A) |
| 功率 | 32.3 dB(A) | 42.8 dB(A) |
| 全速 | 32.3 dB(A) | 51.2 dB(A) |
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23.7 / 23.7 / 23.7 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 23.7 / 29.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.7 dB(A) | ||
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01 | Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -16% | -21% | -8% | -33% | -14% | -27% | |
| off / environment * | 23.7 | 24.3 -3% | 24.7 -4% | 24.6 -4% | 25 -5% | 24.4 -3% | 24.1 -2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.7 | 24.3 -3% | 24.7 -4% | 24.6 -4% | 26 -10% | 24.4 -3% | 24.1 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 23.7 | 24.3 -3% | 24.7 -4% | 24.6 -4% | 27 -14% | 24.4 -3% | 24.1 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.7 | 26.2 -11% | 28.9 -22% | 24.6 -4% | 28 -18% | 24.4 -3% | 28.2 -19% |
| Load Average * | 23.7 | 32.5 -37% | 32.7 -38% | 28.1 -19% | 43 -81% | 32 -35% | 44.4 -87% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 29.7 | 35.2 -19% | 40.4 -36% | 32.4 -9% | 42 -41% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 29.7 | 39.8 -34% | 40.4 -36% | 32.4 -9% | 48 -62% | 39.7 -34% | 44.4 -49% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 30.6 | 36.5 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Vivobook S 15 的外壳温度完全没有问题。在怠速运行和进行简单操作时，机身几乎不会发热，在压力测试中也可以将设备放在大腿上。最高温度为 49.9 °C 的热点位于后部中间区域的底部，这里不应该有皮肤接触。总体而言，负载情况下的温度也比速度更快的 骁龙 X 精英版.使用键盘时没有任何限制。
在 CPU/GPU 综合负载的压力测试中，显卡始终以 1,107 MHz 的全速运行，而 CPU 内核则很快达到 2.7 GHz。芯片温度为 70 °C。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.9 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.7 °C / 85.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.9 °C / -1.7 F).
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 1% | -5% | 4% | -17% | 6% | 15% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41.8 | 43.6 -4% | 41.7 -0% | 44.3 -6% | 55 -32% | 40.3 4% | 36.3 13% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 49.9 | 53.1 -6% | 49.6 1% | 51.6 -3% | 55 -10% | 45.9 8% | 39.1 22% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28.8 | 26.7 7% | 31.1 -8% | 25.1 13% | 32 -11% | 26.3 9% | 24.9 14% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29.1 | 27.2 7% | 33.1 -14% | 25.8 11% | 33 -13% | 27.9 4% | 26.1 10% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
Vivobook S 15 的能耗明显低于骁龙 X 精英版，尤其是在负载情况下 骁龙 X 精英版由于功耗限制较低，这并不奇怪。空闲时也略显经济。所提供的 65 瓦电源完全够用。
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.74 Watt |
| Idle | 4.8 / 5.9 / 7 Watt |
| Load |
15.1 / 54.9 Watt |
   
| |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01 | Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -41% | -167% | -32% | -120% | -125% | -95% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.8 | 4.4 8% | 7.7 -60% | 4.2 12% | 7 -46% | 4.2 12% | 3.5 27% |
| Idle Average * | 5.9 | 6.2 -5% | 13.2 -124% | 5.6 5% | 10 -69% | 11.6 -97% | 9.6 -63% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7 | 7.5 -7% | 13.7 -96% | 7.8 -11% | 19 -171% | 12.3 -76% | 9.9 -41% |
| Load Average * | 15.1 | 33.6 -123% | 76.2 -405% | 28.3 -87% | 52 -244% | 61.9 -310% | 62.7 -315% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 23.2 | 39 -68% | 76.7 -231% | 38.8 -67% | 53.2 -129% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 23.3 | 38.9 -67% | 72.7 -212% | 38.2 -64% | 49.2 -111% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 54.9 | 69.3 -26% | 78.1 -42% | 61.9 -13% | 95 -73% | 140.6 -156% | 101.2 -84% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 29.9 | 57 | 55.8 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
Power consumption with the external Monitor
电池寿命
在电池续航时间方面，搭载全新骁龙 X Plus 的 Vivobook S 15 在满负荷状态下的续航时间明显长于 X-Elite 机型。在无线局域网测试和 150 cd/m² 下的视频测试中，它的表现都略逊一筹。测试结果分别为 12.5 小时和 14.5 小时，总体来说还是不错的，但英特尔的一些竞争对手提供了更长的运行时间。
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, 70 Wh | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 70 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99.9 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 61.8 Wh | Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 84 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -9% | -13% | -20% | -41% | 23% | -14% | -20% | |
| H.264 | 875 | 885 1% | 729 -17% | 879 0% | 1308 49% | 957 9% | 788 ? -10% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 745 | 783 5% | 625 -16% | 443 -41% | 436 -41% | 983 32% | 756 1% | 602 ? -19% |
| Load | 142 | 97 -32% | 134 -6% | 117 -18% | 124 -13% | 68 -52% | 97.5 ? -31% |
Pros
Cons
结论--搭载小型骁龙处理器的 Vivobook S 15 太贵了
基本上，新的 8 核 Snapdragon X Plus 机型的概念是好的，因为只要你不想玩游戏，它们仍能以明显较低的价格为日常任务提供足够的性能。在几乎所有的性能比较中，X1P-42-100 都输给了竞争对手，但它本身仍然是一款反应灵敏的设备。最大的优势是风扇活动和整体噪音水平明显降低。许多用户可能永远也听不到风扇的声音。除此以外，当然还有配备充足连接的良好机箱、良好的输入设备和非常出色的 120 Hz OLED 面板。
新的 8 核骁龙 X Plus 显然比骁龙 X Elite 慢，但风扇也更安静。不过，1149 欧元的价格实在太高了。
当然必须考虑到 ARM Windows 版本的局限性，但最大的问题还是新款 Vivobook S 15 的价格。其建议零售价为 1149 欧元，远高于骁龙 X Plus 新机型的预期。更糟糕的是，配备 16GB 内存和更大的 1 TB SSD 的骁龙 X 精英版 Vivobook 目前在网上的售价为 1,199 欧元。这给新机型带来了麻烦，我们也认为价格过高。
价格和供应情况
配备骁龙 X Plus 的新款华硕 Vivobook S 15 OLED 现在可以直接从华硕订购，价格为 1,149 欧元。.
注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击 这里.
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core
-
09/07/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Price comparison
