索尼 Xperia 10 VI 智能手机评测:小巧、轻便、防水、超强续航能力
罕见。
Xperia 10 VI 是一款小巧灵便的智能手机。不过,这款中档手机拥有超长的电池续航时间,而这往往是紧凑型手机的弱点。阅读索尼 Xperia 10 评测,了解这款索尼手机是否值得投资。Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
在当今市场上,这款 Xperia 10 VI 是一款与众不同的中端智能手机。索尼的这款手机优先考虑了现代设备中日益消失的功能,如内存扩展和 3.5 毫米耳机插孔。此外,Xperia 10 VI 的紧凑设计在中端市场也是罕见的。
与 2023 年的 Xperia 10 相比,VI 机型最大的升级是加入了新的芯片组,即高通骁龙 6 代 1 。索尼也终于改进了软件支持。除此之外,其他方面并无太大变化。Xperia 10 VI 仅配备 8 GB 内存和 128 GB 闪存,售价 392 美元。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
77.3 % | v8 | 08 / 2024 | Sony Xperia 10 VI SD 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710 | 164 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.10" | 2520x1080 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Nothing Phone (2a) Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4 | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2412x1084 | |
85.9 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5 | 209 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2340x1080 | |
75.4 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Motorola Edge 50 Fusion SD 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710 | 175 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
86.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6 | 186 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2712x1220 | |
83.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Sony Xperia 10 V SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 159 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.10" | 2520x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
保护套 - 索尼 Xperia 10 VI,带 IP 保护等级
Xperia 10 VI 的价格相对较低,只是在外壳上略微显眼,但与前代产品相比并没有什么变化。 前代.索尼手机通过了 IP68 认证,正面采用大猩猩玻璃 Victus,防水且坚固耐用。磨砂边框由塑料制成,但与背面一样,仍然给人留下了良好的印象。
68 毫米的 Xperia 10 VI 纤薄小巧,仅重 164 克。除黑色版本外,索尼还提供蓝色和白色版本。Xperia 10 VI 的做工符合中档手机的要求,但显示屏的表面比率就不敢恭维了。索尼手机的屏占比仅为 82.5%,更像是一款入门级机型。
连接性 - Xperia 10 VI 配备 3.5 毫米插孔
Xperia 10 VI 配备了双扬声器系统、蓝牙 5.2、UFS 2.2 内存和用于非接触式支付的 NFC 芯片。不过,索尼中端 Xperia 依然使用 USB 2.0 端口,速度明显较慢--我们使用 M2.SSD 硬盘(三星 980 Pro)进行的测试显示,传输速度仅为 20 MB/s。此外,USB 端口不支持有线图像输出。好的一面是,连接的数据载体不仅可以用 FAT32 格式化,还可以用 exFAT 格式化。但它不支持 NTFS 文件系统。
microSD 读卡器
Xperia 10 VI 的 microSD 卡可以用 FAT、FAT32 或 exFAT 格式化。不过,在我们的拷贝测试中,卡槽的速度相对较慢,在跨平台磁盘测试中表现一般。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Sony Xperia 10 V (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件 - 索尼智能手机,含Android 14
Xperia 10 VI 的操作系统基于谷歌Android 第 14 版,在测试时还基于 2024 年 6 月的安全修复。Xperia UI 已被制造商覆盖。
可持续性
这款智能手机将接受三次主要的Android 更新和四年的安全更新。索尼声称,手机外壳使用了可回收塑料,但我们无法证实其使用程度。包装不使用塑料,由 "原始混合材料 "制成,这是一种从竹子或甘蔗等快速生长的植物以及回收废纸中提取的纸制品。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 功能的索尼 Xperia 10 VI
它支持接入快速的 5G 移动网络。
在家庭 Wi-Fi 网络中,这款中端手机仅支持 Wi-Fi 5,与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 搭配使用时,平均传输速率超过 600 Mbps。虽然这些速度足以满足日常使用,但我们希望在 2024 年这个价位的手机能支持 Wi-Fi 6。
Networking | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Sony Xperia 10 V | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
索尼手机配备了单频全球导航卫星系统。为了评估其实际定位精度,我们与 Garmin Venu 2 同时记录了一条路线进行比较。详细的路线显示有一两处误差,这在这个价位的手机中并不少见。
手机功能和语音质量 - 配备双卡双待功能的索尼智能手机
双卡 Xperia 10 VI 支持物理 nanoSIM 卡和 eSIM 集成。它还提供 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话功能。语音质量一直很好,我们的对话伙伴报告说音频很清晰,但仍能感受到一些环境噪音。
摄像头 - 配备双摄像头的 Xperia 10 VI
上一代产品的 800 万像素自拍摄像头保持不变。虽然曝光和锐度可以更好地平衡,但照片质量还算不错。它支持 30 FPS 的全高清视频录制。
后置摄像头的焦点是一个分辨率为 4800 万像素的 1/2.0 英寸 OIS 传感器。在日光下,Xperia 10 VI 拍出的照片效果不错,不过边缘的清晰度大打折扣。根据我们的评估,Xperia 10 VI 的色彩还原能力不错,但在实际使用中,冷色调和暖色调图像之间存在明显的不均匀性。
与 Xperia 10 V 相比,长焦镜头被数码变焦取代,导致放大后的图像质量较低。此外,800 万像素超广角摄像头的 1/4英寸传感器相对较小,也令人失望。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
WeitwinkelWeitwinkelUltraweitwinkelLow LightZoom 5x使用 ColorChecker Passport 照片分析相机的色彩准确性。
此外,在受控照明条件下评估清晰度和成像性能(测试图)。
配件和保修 - 不带电源适配器的 Xperia 智能手机
交货包装中既没有电源适配器、保护盖,也没有附带的显示屏贴膜。Xperia 10 VI 也没有配备 USB-C 数据线或 SIM 卡工具。
在美国,索尼为其智能手机提供 24 个月的保修服务。
输入设备和操作 - Xperia 10 VI 无面部解锁功能
6.1 英寸 60 Hz OLED 显示屏上的输入记录准确,但与刷新率高达 90 Hz 或更高的竞争对手相比,屏幕过渡和滚动明显不够流畅。振动电机(ERM)也感觉不精确,不适合打字。
集成在电源按钮上的指纹传感器偶尔会出现不可靠和速度慢的问题。无法使用前置摄像头通过 2D 面部识别进行生物识别认证。
显示屏:Sony-Handy,带 OLED
乍一看,Xperia 10 VI 的显示屏没有明显变化。它继续采用 6.1 英寸 OLED 面板,分辨率为 1080p,刷新率仅为 60 Hz,与前代产品相同。
我们测得的最大亮度略高于 1,000 cd/m²,略高于 Xperia 10 V。在实际的 APL18 测试(1,063 cd/m²)和 HDR 内容播放(990 cd/m²)中均是如此。
索尼智能手机使用 PWM(脉宽调制)控制亮度,工作频率低至 240 Hz。不过,对于 60 Hz 面板而言,18.5% 的波动相对较低。
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1010 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3
Sony Xperia 10 VI OLED, 2520x1080, 6.1" | Nothing Phone (2a) AMOLED, 2412x1084, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6" | Motorola Edge 50 Fusion P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Sony Xperia 10 V OLED, 2520x1080, 6.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -11% | -39% | 1% | -1% | -7% | |
Brightness middle | 1010 | 1033 2% | 904 -10% | 1213 20% | 1034 2% | 933 -8% |
Brightness | 1012 | 1042 3% | 912 -10% | 1190 18% | 1035 2% | 944 -7% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 96 -1% | 97 0% | 93 -4% | 96 -1% | 97 0% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1 | 1.6 -60% | 2.1 -110% | 1.36 -36% | 1.1 -10% | 1.1 -10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.1 | 2.5 -19% | 2.8 -33% | 2.3 -10% | 1.9 10% | 1.7 19% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1.2 8% | 2.2 -69% | 1.1 15% | 1.4 -8% | 1.8 -38% |
Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.07 106% | 2.1 105% | 2.254 98% | 2.22 99% | 2.29 96% |
CCT | 6539 99% | 6482 100% | 6478 100% | 6624 98% | 6674 97% | 6611 98% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 18.52 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
我们使用光谱仪和 CalMAN 软件进行的分析表明,Delta-E 与 sRGB 色彩空间的平均偏差非常小。此外,用户还可以调整白平衡,并在设置菜单中选择两种色彩配置文件。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
3.14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.6 ms rise | |
↘ 1.543 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
3.64 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.478 ms rise | |
↘ 2.165 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Xperia 10 VI 在户外表现出色,应对阳光直射问题不大,但仍应避免反光。在手动调节亮度时,由于最大亮度为 662 cd/m²,因此可能需要在阴暗处进行调节。OLED 显示屏的可视角度非常稳定。
性能 - 配备高通 SoC 技术的 Xperia 10 VI
高通 高通骁龙 6 代 1索尼中端手机 Xperia 10 VI 所采用的高通骁龙 6 代并不总能带来流畅的系统体验。在单核性能方面,这款智能手机与前代产品不相上下。它很难与更强大的中端设备竞争,如 Poco X6 Pro和 Exynos 1380的 Galaxy A35有时也能提供明显更好的性能。Xperia 10 VI 配备了 Adreno 710图形处理器,与 Xperia 10 V 相比有了明显改善,但这款 2024 机型的图形性能仍然相对一般。
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (7236 - 8191, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Sony Xperia 10 V |
Geekbench ML | |
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU | |
Average of class Smartphone (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 () | |
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU | |
Average of class Smartphone (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 () | |
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI | |
Average of class Smartphone (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 () | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark: Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Sony Xperia 10 V |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Sony Xperia 10 V |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Sony Xperia 10 V |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Sony Xperia 10 V | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Sony Xperia 10 V |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Sony Xperia 10 V |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Sony Xperia 10 V |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Sony Xperia 10 V |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Sony Xperia 10 V |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Sony Xperia 10 V |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Sony Xperia 10 V |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Sony Xperia 10 V |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Sony Xperia 10 V |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Sony Xperia 10 V |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Sony Xperia 10 V |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Sony Xperia 10 V |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Sony Xperia 10 V |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Sony Xperia 10 V |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Sony Xperia 10 V |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Sony Xperia 10 V |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (69.6 - 88.2, n=3) | |
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116) | |
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0) | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI (Chrome 126) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126) | |
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (62.5 - 86.6, n=3) | |
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116) | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI (Chrome 126) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64) | |
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (70 - 95, n=3) | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI (Chrome 126) | |
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100) | |
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (24583 - 32436, n=3) | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI (Chrome 126) | |
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (1188 - 1786, n=3) | |
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116) | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI (Chrome 126) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126) | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64) |
* ... smaller is better
Sony Xperia 10 VI | Nothing Phone (2a) | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | Sony Xperia 10 V | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 3% | -52% | -8% | 172% | -47% | -34% | 40% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 963.31 | 1028.37 7% | 529.32 -45% | 967.8 0% | 3824.7 297% | 444.54 -54% | 728 ? -24% | 1887 ? 96% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 876.95 | 952 9% | 270 -69% | 800.5 -9% | 3642.57 315% | 438.02 -50% | 527 ? -40% | 1471 ? 68% |
Random Read 4KB | 289.03 | 273.19 -5% | 244.24 -15% | 281.5 -3% | 355.7 23% | 175.72 -39% | 191.7 ? -34% | 278 ? -4% |
Random Write 4KB | 306.61 | 311.8 2% | 62.59 -80% | 241.4 -21% | 467.74 53% | 165.15 -46% | 185.8 ? -39% | 311 ? 1% |
排放 - 索尼手机保持相当低的温度
温度
Xperia 10 VI 的发热情况得到了很好的控制,这也是中端机型的典型特征。通过 3DMark 压力测试,我们可以观察到内部散热效果良好,其中包括 高通 SoC即使在长时间负载时也能保持稳定的性能。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Sony Xperia 10 V | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Sony Xperia 10 V | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion | |
Sony Xperia 10 VI |
发言人
在我们的测试中,立体声扬声器提供了相当线性的中音和微妙的低音响应。高音虽然也有,但整体效果可能会更加一致。
此外,您还可以通过低噪音 3.5 毫米插孔(信噪比:80.3 dBFS)或蓝牙无线连接耳机。该设备支持多种音频编解码器。
Sony Xperia 10 VI audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
运行时间 - Xperia 10 VI(带耐力
耗电量
Xperia 10 VI 在负载和闲置模式下的功耗都很低。不过,快速充电仍然不是这款索尼中端机型的强项。它支持最大 30 瓦的有线充电,而 5,000 毫安时电池不提供无线充电功能。
Off / Standby | 0.03 / 0.16 Watt |
Idle | 0.62 / 0.94 / 0.97 Watt |
Load |
3.36 / 8.54 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Sony Xperia 10 VI 5000 mAh | Nothing Phone (2a) 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 5000 mAh | Motorola Edge 50 Fusion 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G 5000 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 V 5000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -55% | -71% | -51% | -93% | -2% | -163% | -55% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.62 | 0.81 -31% | 0.89 -44% | 1 -61% | 1.11 -79% | 0.56 10% | 1.017 ? -64% | 0.883 ? -42% |
Idle Average * | 0.94 | 2.01 -114% | 1.99 -112% | 1.3 -38% | 1.14 -21% | 0.91 3% | 3.86 ? -311% | 1.467 ? -56% |
Idle Maximum * | 0.97 | 2.07 -113% | 2.14 -121% | 1.9 -96% | 1.16 -20% | 0.98 -1% | 3.91 ? -303% | 1.621 ? -67% |
Load Average * | 3.36 | 4.16 -24% | 4.57 -36% | 5.1 -52% | 12.33 -267% | 5.34 -59% | 7.63 ? -127% | 6.58 ? -96% |
Load Maximum * | 8.54 | 7.91 7% | 12.31 -44% | 9.4 -10% | 15.34 -80% | 5.46 36% | 9.59 ? -12% | 9.91 ? -16% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
索尼 Xperia 10 VI 的显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m2,在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,它在实际设置下的电池续航时间表现出色。Xperia 10 VI 的电池续航时间超过 20 小时,与前代产品几乎相同。 前代产品.
Pros
Cons
索尼 Xperia 10 VI 的评价
索尼与当前的 Xperia 10 系列保持一致,在第六代产品中提供了与 Xperia 10 V 相似的配置。 Xperia 10 V,但由于采用了改进的 骁龙芯片和扩展的软件支持。不过,在日常使用中,高通芯片组的性能并没有真正给人留下深刻印象。在中端产品中,一款 Poco X6 Pro的性能要好得多。此外,原本不错的 OLED 面板刷新率较低,给人一种过时的感觉。
像 Xperia 10 VI 这样的宽显示屏边框在中端智能手机中也应该成为过去式了。
Xperia 10 VI 的突出特点是内置音频插孔和支持 microSD,这在这个价位的手机中是独一无二的。这些功能加上其出色的电池续航时间和出色的扬声器,构成了一个全面的组合。如果您需要更长的更新时间和更好的性能,那么 Galaxy A55是 Xperia 10 VI 令人信服的替代品。
价格和供应情况
索尼 Xperia 10 VI 的售价为 392 美元,可从亚马逊等多家销售商或直接从索尼公司购买。
Sony Xperia 10 VI
- 08/06/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.