Notebookcheck Logo

华硕ZenBook Pro 14 Duo笔记本电脑评测,为创意者提供第二块显示屏:提高生产力

仅仅是更多的屏幕。

华硕Zenbook Pro 14 Duo拥有第二块显示屏,是一个真正的看点,至少在打开时是这样。RTX 4060和英特尔酷睿i9确保了这里的高性能。但高端笔记本电脑也有其缺点,Zenbook不像其他14.5英寸笔记本电脑那样机动。
Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake Geforce Windows

你可以用第二张看得更清楚!这就是我们在YouTube上关于华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo 16的视频。被称为。但是,这款游戏笔记本电脑并不是华硕唯一拥有第二个显示屏的设备。而不是一个AMD处理器和 RTX 4090,华硕Zenbook Pro 14 Duo使用了一个 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060 英特尔酷睿i9-13900H.我们已经测试了一个 Zenbook Pro 14 Duo14.5英寸显示屏,但当时它没有一个DGPU。类似于键盘的 键盘类似于Zenbook Pro 16X可以折叠的键盘,可折叠的第二块显示屏使笔记本电脑的风扇能够获得更强大的气流,可能导致更有效的冷却,最终使笔记本电脑的性能更高。

有了NvidaGeForce RTX 4060,笔记本电脑的工作效率明显提高。第二块显示屏可以让你简单地将许多创意程序的工具栏移到底部,从而为基本任务提供更多显示区域。

尽管这款小型笔记本电脑的操作控制概念可能是独一无二的,但在小型笔记本电脑领域有许多竞争对手,他们都有强大的CPU和GPU选项。例如,虽然Gigabyte Aero 14 OLEDSchenker Vision 14 在各方面都比Zenbook略小,但它们也是经典的笔记本电脑,没有第二个显示屏的优点和缺点。如果你想买华硕的笔记本电脑,Vivobook S 14X 可能也很有意思。

Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W (Zenbook Pro 14 Duo Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, 55 W TDP ( including 20 W Dynamic Boost)
Memory
32 GB 
Display
14.50 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 243 PPI, Yes, native pen support, ATNA45AF04-0 , OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, 2048 GB 
, 12800 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH - cAVS
Connections
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz)
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 21 x 322 x 225
Battery
76 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 2.1 MP Windows Hello
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet keyboard, 1.4mm key travel, Keyboard Light: yes, Bag, Asus Pen 2.0, stand, Asus: GlideX, MyASUS, ProArt Creator Hub, ScreenXpert; McAfee virus scanner, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.808 kg, Power Supply: 472 g
Price
2349 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
87 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg21 mm14.50"2880x1800
86 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
1.7 kg19.8 mm14.00"2880x1800
90.2 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
1.5 kg15.6 mm14.50"3072x1920
89.4 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
1.4 kg17 mm14.00"2880x1800
88 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg29.7 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.8 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.3 kg16.6 mm14.00"2880x1800
84.4 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2022
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.7 kg19.6 mm14.50"2880x1800
84.1 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z
i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.6 kg17.9 mm14.50"2880x1800

案例--第二个显示屏下方的AAS冷却

只要Zenbook关闭,它看起来就非常不起眼,你无法看到这款拥有14.5英寸显示屏的笔记本电脑的不寻常设计理念。它的显示屏盖和底盖采用了铝制部件,如果你拿起这个小设备,它看起来质量很高,也许有点重。只有当你打开Zenbook Pro Duo时,你才能看到设计上的变化,为第二个显示屏腾出空间。键盘和触摸板共享底座下半部分的空间。掌托已被完全移除。键盘上方是巨大的第二块显示屏,现在被称为 "Screenpad+",除了作为第二块显示屏的功能外,还提供几个控制元素。自从我们之前对 2022年的Zenbook Pro Duo 14,华硕没有对笔记本电脑的外观做任何明显的改变。

折叠机制
折叠机制
折叠机制
折叠机制
折叠机制

主显示屏的铰链机制仍然略微摇晃,而Sceenpad+则在其15°的开启角度上保持紧密的固定。即使大显示屏可以轻微翘起,但底座的硬度仍然为Zenbook Pro Duo 14提供了高质量和坚固的感觉。

坐在桌面上,这台笔记本电脑需要的空间比没有第二块显示屏的同等大小的设备稍微深一些。由于没有掌托,手掌必须放在设备前面。这也使在膝上使用笔记本电脑成为一种平衡行为。笔记本电脑的重心在后面相对较远的地方,而你通常用手稳定笔记本电脑的地方现在被触摸板和键盘占据。剩下的唯一实用解决方案是在第二个显示器上使用屏幕键盘,并关闭物理输入设备。

华硕Zenbook Pro Duo 14
华硕Zenbook Pro Duo 14
华硕Zenbook Pro Duo 14
华硕Zenbook Pro Duo 14
华硕Zenbook Pro Duo 14
华硕Zenbook Pro Duo 14

Zenbook Pro Duo的重量为1.8公斤(约4磅),厚度为21毫米(约0.83英寸),在14至15英寸笔记本电脑中是相当大和重的。第二个显示屏及其复杂的铰链机械装置肯定会增加几克和几毫米的重量。但华硕还增加了一个巨大的冷却系统,带有厚厚的热管和相对较大的风扇,这也增加了重量。 因此,所有其他竞争对手的14英寸设备都更薄更轻,这并不令人惊讶。此外,由于缺乏掌托,使用笔记本电脑实际需要的占地面积也增加了。

尺寸比较

355 mm 266 mm 29.7 mm 2.7 kg323.5 mm 224.7 mm 19.6 mm 1.7 kg322 mm 225 mm 21 mm 1.8 kg326 mm 227 mm 15.6 mm 1.5 kg313.4 mm 227 mm 19.8 mm 1.7 kg311 mm 220.8 mm 17 mm 1.4 kg308.8 mm 215 mm 16.6 mm 1.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备 - 后面有微型SD卡读卡器

Zenbooks的连接分布在三个侧面。左侧几乎完全是空的,只有一个3.5毫米音频端口。与电源连接和HDMI端口一起,microSD读卡器被放置在笔记本电脑的背面,只留下右侧的几个USB连接。总的来说,连接设备是相当有限的。

右边:2个USB-C,带Thunderbolt 4、DisplayPort和PowerDelivery;USB-A 3.2 Gen 2
右边:2个USB-C,带Thunderbolt 4、DisplayPort和PowerDelivery;USB-A 3.2 Gen 2
背面:HDMI 2.1 FRL;microSD读卡器;DC电源接口
背面:HDMI 2.1 FRL;microSD读卡器;DC电源接口
左边:3.5毫米音频接口
左边:3.5毫米音频接口

SD卡阅读器

使用我们的V60速度级别的128GBAV PRO microSD,传输速度仍然相当平庸。技嘉的Aero 14 OLED有一个明显更快的读卡器,但Schenker Vision 14的读卡器则比较慢。此外,microSD读卡器在后面很难触及。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
182 MB/s +149%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
177.9 (155.77min - 183.27max) MB/s +143%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years)
102.2 MB/s +40%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
78.6 MB/s +7%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
73.2 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
57.8 MB/s -21%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
269 MB/s +223%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
186.02 MB/s +124%
Average of class Multimedia
  (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years)
142.9 MB/s +72%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
83.2 MB/s
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
81.9 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
80.5 MB/s -3%

沟通

英特尔AX211
英特尔AX211

英特尔的AX 211 WLAN Modul在这里第二次展示了其峰值性能。使用我们的AXE11000路由器,华硕Zenbook Pro Duo的传输速度很高而且很稳定。然而,突出的是5GHz网络中的连接比6GHz网络中的连接更快。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1574 (1478min - 1665max) MBit/s 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1567 (1367min - 1661max) MBit/s
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1458 (1294min - 1591max) MBit/s -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (358 - 1921, n=79, last 2 years)
1363 MBit/s -13%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1348 (1296min, 1296.87P1 - 1385max) MBit/s -14%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1921, n=239)
1234 MBit/s -21%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1679 (1641min - 1697max) MBit/s 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1678 (1641min - 1711max) MBit/s
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1570 (1446min - 1613max) MBit/s -6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1541 (1426min, 1427.45P1 - 1639max) MBit/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (709 - 1789, n=78, last 2 years)
1451 MBit/s -14%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=239)
1379 MBit/s -18%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
MediaTek RZ616
1767 (1634min, 1649.37P1 - 1855max) MBit/s +26%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1601 (1502min - 1664max) MBit/s +14%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1594 (1492min - 1637max) MBit/s +13%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1482 (1273min - 1624max) MBit/s +5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (705 - 1816, n=36, last 2 years)
1411 MBit/s 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1406 (1285min - 1499max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (632 - 1851, n=211)
1372 MBit/s -2%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
MediaTek RZ616
1738 (1633min, 1638.51P1 - 1768max) MBit/s +10%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1667 (1652min - 1678max) MBit/s +6%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1665 (1628min - 1691max) MBit/s +6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1577 (1301min - 1639max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (700 - 1857, n=210)
1493 MBit/s -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (700 - 1807, n=36, last 2 years)
1488 MBit/s -6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1454 (1377min - 1497max) MBit/s -8%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1406 (1285-1499)
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1577 (1301-1639)
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1567 (1367-1661)
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1677 (1641-1711)

网络摄像头

在良好的光线条件下,Zenbook的全高清网络摄像头可以提供清晰的图像和令人满意的色彩再现。它还用于通过Windows Hello进行人脸识别,由于使用了红外线,在光线不好的情况下应该能够提供正确的结果。然而,一旦光线条件变弱,普通网络摄像头的图像就会失去质量。

ColorChecker
27.8 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
33.5 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
25 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W: 23.88 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 35.31 ∆E

安全问题

TPM是现代笔记本电脑的标准配置。除此以外,Zenbook Pro Duo 14的其他安全功能也很有限。这里只能列出带人脸识别的摄像头和英特尔酷睿i9的集成安全功能。

辅料

这台不寻常的笔记本电脑的盒子被装得满满的。除了相应的充电器和必须的纸张收集,我们还可以找到一套脚,一个保护套,以及华硕的手写笔。

华硕Zenbook Pro Duo 14 OLED的包装盒中包括
华硕Zenbook Pro Duo 14 OLED的包装盒中包括

维护

华硕Zenbook Pro Duo 14可以快速打开,无需使用很多工具。机箱的底部由一打TX5螺丝固定。一旦它们被卸下,你就可以轻松地取下底盖,因为这时它只被笔记本中间的两个塑料夹子固定住。 轻轻一拉,你就把底盖握在手里。在下面,你可以看到许多焊接好的部件。在所有的硬件组件中,只有固态硬盘可以轻易更换。既没有一个空闲的M.2插槽,也没有SO-DIMM插槽用于额外的工作内存。更换电池也会非常困难,因为它是用几条胶条和螺丝固定的。除了清洁风扇外,你不能在笔记本电脑内执行许多任务。

华硕Zenbook Pro Duo 14维护
华硕Zenbook Pro Duo 14维护
华硕Zenbook Pro Duo 14维护

担保

华硕对我们的测试设备提供了两年的全球保修。其他配置可能有不同的保修条件。

输入设备 - 使用手指、输入笔、鼠标和键盘

Zenbook Pro Duo 14及其带有第二个显示屏的较大的兄弟姐妹在输入设备方面相当独特。首先,键盘和触摸板的布局是不寻常的。你的手不能放在掌托上,而必须放在笔记本前面。但你很快就会习惯触摸板的位置和格式。在我们的测试中,经过几个小时后,我们已经在键盘右侧的任何其他笔记本电脑上徒劳地寻找它了。然后,输入设备还包括两个显示器,因为它们是触摸敏感的,也支持通过MPP 2.0笔输入。华硕已经包括一个相应的华硕笔2.0。

键盘

Zenbook Pro Duo的键盘提供1.4毫米(约0.055英寸)的相当长的按键行程。但它在触觉反馈方面仍有一些需要改进之处。不幸的是,打字的体验必须被描述为相当有弹性。由于笔记本电脑的设计不同寻常,在键盘布局方面也没有办法进行一些调整。这意味着回车键变小了,而方向键则明显缩小了。

触摸板

触摸板的尺寸也相当小,只有5.4×7.7厘米(约2.1×3.0英寸),这大约是一台笔记本电脑的尺寸。 华硕Eee PC笔记本电脑2008年的尺寸。另一方面,现在的Zenbook在做工方面看起来明显好了很多。触摸板由一块相当厚的哑光玻璃板组成。尽管它的尺寸很小,但你不会感觉到你必须不断切换手指的位置或输入不够准确。不幸的是,触摸板下面的两个键也是略带海绵的,就像键盘一样。

华硕Zenbook Pro Duo 14输入设备
华硕Zenbook Pro Duo 14输入设备

键盘+和触摸屏

屏保+快速启动栏
屏保+快速启动栏

Zenbook Pro Duo的两个屏幕都能响应多达10个手指的触摸输入。然而,主屏幕的光亮表面是一个真正的指纹磁铁,而Screenpad+的哑光表面更适合触摸输入。华硕在这里的实用菜单栏中包含了各种附加功能。副显示屏也可以作为触摸板或数字块使用。

不幸的是,我们在测试中也看到,Windows偶尔会出现将输入硬件与相应的显示屏关联的问题。有时,触摸输入或MPP 2.0笔输入会从Screenpad+转移到主显示屏上。只有制造商提供的华硕Sceenpad 2优化器,供下载才能提供补救措施。这个应用程序将把所有的设备与正确的显示器联系起来,但它也需要重新启动Windows。

ProArt Creator Hub中的控制面板为Screenpad+提供可调节的控制条。你可以在这里找到预先创建的配置文件,用于Adobe、Microsoft Office和几个浏览器的几个应用程序。控制中心还提供了为其他程序自己创建相应控制条的选项。但我们也要注意到,在我们的测试中,我们在实现必要的组合键输入方面有一些困难。 原因是ProArt Creator Hub使用英文键盘布局进行输入,尽管笔记本电脑使用的是德国键盘布局和德语。我们只能通过连接具有美国布局的外部键盘来创建有用的输入,因为即使是Windows的屏幕键盘在这里也有错误的布局。

华硕笔2.0

华硕笔2.0与MPP 2标准兼容。由于其内部电池和USB-C端口,该输入笔不需要任何电池。华硕还包括各种输入端,在屏幕上产生不同程度的摩擦。你无法将笔固定或插入笔记本电脑本身,但附带的套筒有一个环,可供笔使用。

这支笔提供了三个可编程的按键。它支持4096个压力级别,但没有一个位置传感器。这意味着输入点并不总是准确地在笔尖之下。

带套的笔记本电脑和输入笔
带套的笔记本电脑和输入笔
华硕笔2与配件
华硕笔2与配件

显示屏 - 显著增加屏幕面积

OLED主显示屏子像素网格
OLED主显示屏子像素网格
第二台显示器上高对比度过渡的彩虹效果
第二台显示器上高对比度过渡的彩虹效果

华硕使用120赫兹的富含对比度的OLED显示屏作为Zenbook Pro Duo的主显示屏。它的优点是响应时间短,色彩还原度高。它的像素为2880×1800,分辨率高达243 ppi。然而,反射式显示屏也有它的弱点,特别是一些反射一直让用户感到烦恼。光源清晰地反射在触摸屏的各层上,甚至可以看到个别导体的痕迹。作为OLED屏幕的典型代表,在照明方面没有任何缺陷。

虽然华硕在主显示屏上使用了新的面板,但Screenpad+仍然没有改变。对于副显示屏的更详细的分析,我们请你参考我们的 对兄弟姐妹机型的测试.哑光的第二显示屏使用IPS面板,分辨率为2,880 × 864像素。然而,由于磨砂表面,高分辨率并不完全有效,图像在这里显得略有颗粒感。这主要体现在高对比度的色彩转换上。 此外,大多数时候Windows无法像我们希望的那样使用第二块显示屏。虽然主显示屏可以进行100%至250%的缩放调整,但副显示屏只提供100%和125%。这也意味着,当在主显示屏和副显示屏之间移动Windows时,显示元素的大小不断变化。

341
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
ATNA45AF04-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 342 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 340.2 cd/m² Minimum: 0.44 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 336 cd/m²
Contrast: 170000:1 (Black: 0.002 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.76 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.62
ΔE Greyscale 1.16 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.91% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
ATNA45AF04-0 , OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5"
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Samsung ATNA40YK07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
LEN145-3K, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5"
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Samsung SDC4192 (ATNA40YK14-0), OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NE160QDM-NM4, MiniLED, 2560x1600, 16"
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
MNE007ZA1-1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
ATNA45AF01-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5"
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z
Samsung ATNA45AF01-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5"
Display
1%
-3%
-2%
-2%
-17%
1%
0%
Display P3 Coverage
99.91
99.9
0%
98.7
-1%
99.8
0%
99.4
-1%
74.1
-26%
99.9
0%
99.9
0%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
100
0%
100
0%
100
0%
97.4
-3%
100
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
95.35
99
4%
87.6
-8%
88.7
-7%
90.8
-5%
75.3
-21%
97.4
2%
95.5
0%
Response Times
39%
-1083%
-5%
1130%
-1050%
-13%
38%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2 ?(1, 1)
1.36 ?(0.68, 0.68)
32%
31.5 ?(14.5, 17)
-1475%
2.4 ?(1.4, 1)
-20%
15.2 ?(11.2, 4)
-660%
31.5 ?(14, 17.5)
-1475%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
-20%
0.73 ?(0.37, 0.36)
63%
Response Time Black / White *
2 ?(1, 1)
1.36 ?(0.52, 0.84)
32%
15.8 ?(5.4, 10.4)
-690%
2.4 ?(1.4, 1)
-20%
19 ?(10.6, 8.4)
-850%
14.5 ?(4.7, 9.8)
-625%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
-20%
1 ?(0.5, 0.5)
50%
PWM Frequency
240
367.6 ?(100)
53%
300
25%
12000 ?(100)
4900%
240 ?(100)
0%
240.4 ?(100)
0%
Screen
-53%
-1858%
-527%
-380%
-1602%
-131%
-21%
Brightness middle
340
414.3
22%
441
30%
423
24%
712
109%
421
24%
356
5%
373
10%
Brightness
340
416
22%
453
33%
427
26%
703
107%
416
22%
357
5%
375
10%
Brightness Distribution
99
99
0%
92
-7%
98
-1%
95
-4%
89
-10%
99
0%
99
0%
Black Level *
0.002
0.34
-16900%
0.1
-4900%
0.07
-3400%
0.28
-13900%
0.02
-900%
Contrast
170000
1297
-99%
4230
-98%
10171
-94%
1504
-99%
17800
-90%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.76
4.68
-166%
0.6
66%
0.55
69%
1.7
3%
3.2
-82%
2.6
-48%
2.26
-28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.2
7.78
-143%
1.3
59%
1.15
64%
4
-25%
5.5
-72%
4.5
-41%
6.22
-94%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.62
0.6
63%
1.15
29%
1.2
26%
2
-23%
2
-23%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.16
1.8
-55%
0.8
31%
0.69
41%
2.8
-141%
4.4
-279%
2.2
-90%
1.4
-21%
Gamma
2.43 91%
2.22 99%
2.2 100%
2.42 91%
2.21 100%
2.22 99%
2.2 100%
2.22 99%
CCT
6418 101%
6207 105%
6597 99%
6479 100%
6978 93%
6384 102%
6246 104%
6417 101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-4% / -17%
-981% / -1350%
-178% / -318%
249% / -2%
-890% / -1184%
-48% / -81%
6% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

OLED显示屏几乎能够完全再现sRGB和DisplayP3色彩空间,而Zenbook还覆盖了95%的AdobeRGB色彩空间,这对摄影师来说更为重要。

vs. Adobe RGB
vs. Adobe RGB
与DisplayP3相比
与DisplayP3相比
vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB

我们创建的ICC配置文件(下载链接在上面的信息框中)只是稍微改善了Zenbook Pro 14 Duo的色彩再现,它已经非常好了,使绝对色彩偏差下降到略低于ΔΕ3。然而,这也不利于灰度,灰度的颜色偏差略有增加。
在使用X-Rite i1 Pro和Calman ColorChecker进行显示器校准之前,颜色值已经非常准确,只有受过训练的眼睛才能识别任何差异。 ProArt Creator Hub也提供了一个校准颜色的选项,但它目前只支持i1Display颜色校准器

Calman ColorChecker
Calman ColorChecker
Calman ColorChecker已校准
Calman ColorChecker已校准
卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度仪的校准
卡尔曼灰度仪的校准
考尔曼饱和度
考尔曼饱和度
Calman 饱和度校准
Calman 饱和度校准

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

10%的亮度
20%
40%
80%
100%

在户外,Screenpad+明显比主显示屏更容易阅读。然而,小显示屏的可读性也在一定程度上受到来自上方强光源的影响。

户外使用
户外使用
来自上方的光源
来自上方的光源
显示器中的反射
显示器中的反射

作为OLED和IPS屏幕的典型代表,这两块显示屏即使从较陡峭的视角也能提供良好的图像。几乎没有任何明显的色彩偏差或亮度变化。

从左上角的观察角度
从左上角的观察角度
直视图
直视图
从右边看的角度
从右边看的角度

性能 - RTX 4060和英特尔酷睿i9的强大组合

华硕Zenbook Pro 14 Duo有各种设备配置。你可以在英特尔第12代和第13代酷睿i7和i9处理器中选择,这些处理器由高达32GB的工作内存支持。在图形芯片方面也有不同的设备版本,可用的选择范围从 英特尔Iris Xe iGPU的i7,通过 NvidiaGeForce RTX 30504050,直到 RTX 4060.
我们的测试装置配备了一个 英特尔酷睿i9-13900H和NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060。该处理器由32GB的DDR5存储支持。在顶级设备的支持下,这台笔记本电脑的生产效率非常高,但它也能够使用MUX开关高效运行。游戏、3D应用、创意图像和视频处理,以及CAD应用对该笔记本电脑来说都不成问题。

性能控制和测试条件

使用ProArt Creator Hub或MyAsus App,您可以在三个电源配置文件中选择性能、标准和静音。没有一个配置文件允许处理器持续保持其性能。在性能和标准模式下,i9的Boost性能被限制在80瓦,而静音模式允许60瓦的PL2。在性能模式下,i9的PL1为60瓦。 英特尔酷睿i9-13900H开始时也是80瓦,而在标准和静音模式下分别为60瓦和35瓦。PL1在这里是动态调整的。在我们的测试中,我们必须注意到,Zenbook无法在较长的时间内保持这些性能。在负载下的10分钟内,所有电源模式下的功率限制都减少了10到20瓦。

的性能。 RTX 4060的性能也是由电源管理控制的。根据选定的电源模式,它可以消耗55瓦、45瓦或20瓦。CPU最多消耗15瓦(动态功率转换)。日志显示,与处理器相比,显卡能够不断保持其性能。

笔记本电脑包括一个用于控制显卡的MUX开关。屏幕可以直接连接到Core i9的iGPU或GeForce RTX 4060。这也提供了完全关闭iGPU或dGPU的选项。
对于系统性能的基准测试,我们决定为笔记本电脑使用标准模式,因为这主要要求与性能模式相同的Boost性能。游戏基准测试是使用性能模式运行的,另外还关闭了iGPU和Screenpad+。

Cinebench R23 10分钟循环
Cinebench R23 10分钟循环
进行8次Time Spy 压力测试
进行8次Time Spy 压力测试

处理器

作为猛禽湖H系列的一个高端CPU,i9-13900H是市场上最强大的CPU之一。虽然在我们的测试装置中,i9在短暂的负载高峰期以高于平均水平的速度运行,但它无法在长期内保持这种性能。无论负载水平如何,本来很高的性能在几分钟后略有下降。 然而,由于其20个线程分布在6个P核和8个E核上,性能下降几乎不明显,而且i9迅速完成了所有的突出任务。Zenbook Pro 14 Duo中的i9-13900H出现了高于平均水平的功率,这也是一个因素,尽管它有轻微的节流,但该处理器被允许消耗超过英特尔建议的45瓦的TDP。

处理器基准测试的比较给出了一个相当清晰的画面,我们没有看到Zenbook Pro 14 Duo的AAS冷却系统带来的明显的性能优势。例如,华硕的 华硕Zenbook Pro 14 OLED以相同的处理器硬件提供类似的计算性能,即使没有特殊的冷却系统。但我们也必须考虑到,该笔记本的基准测试是使用性能模式运行的。因此,最终,英特尔酷睿i9-13900H在这里提供的高性能,正是我们应该能够从猛禽湖H系列中期待的性能。对Alder Lake的明显优势在此并不明显。的 AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX中的Zephyrus Duo 16因此明显更强大。

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

02805608401120140016801960224025202800308033603640392042004480476050405320Tooltip
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2497 (2154.13-2705.63)
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2282 (2251.36-2406.88)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2374 (2297.79-2615.58)
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2029 (1995.31-2490.5)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX: Ø5385 (5255.55-5554.01)
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1988 (1948.94-2166.26)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA Intel Core i7-12700H; Performance: Ø2250 (2201.55-2389.34)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA Intel Core i7-12700H; Balanced: Ø2111 (2031.08-2355.57)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2643 (2455.49-3023.2)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2466 (2355.02-2908.24)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
83.7 pt
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
65.2 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H
63.7 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
60.9 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
58.7 pt
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
57.6 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
 
57.4 pt
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
54.2 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
51.6 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
50.8 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
34521 (32987.6min - 34521.3max) Points +100%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
19014 Points +10%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H
17959 Points +4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
17442 Points +1%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
17236 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (11997 - 20385, n=28)
16813 Points -2%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
15906 (14978min - 15906.4max) Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years)
15500 Points -10%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
14917 Points -13%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
14325 (12974.5min - 14324.9max) Points -17%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
2054 Points +4%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H
2038 Points +4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
1966 Points
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
1940 Points -1%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
1910 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (1297 - 2054, n=26)
1887 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
1881 Points -4%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
1840 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years)
1769 Points -10%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
1678 Points -15%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
13457 Points +105%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
7289 Points +11%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H
6921 Points +5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
6597 Points 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
6574 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (4935 - 7716, n=25)
6533 Points -1%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
6108 Points -7%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
5762 Points -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years)
5687 Points -13%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
5373 Points -18%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H
792 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
792 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
773 Points
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
756 Points -2%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
733 Points -5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
730 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (428 - 792, n=25)
720 Points -7%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
712 Points -8%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
701 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years)
651 Points -16%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
5554 (5255.55min - 5554.01max) Points +105%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
3023 (2455.49min - 3023.2max) Points +12%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H
2908 Points +7%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
2706 (2154.13min - 2705.63max) Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (2061 - 3100, n=26)
2676 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
2616 (2297.79min - 2615.58max) Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
2491 (1995.31min - 2490.5max) Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years)
2445 Points -10%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
2407 (2251.36min - 2406.88max) Points -11%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
2166 (1948.94min - 2166.26max) Points -20%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
307 Points +7%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
297 Points +3%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H
295 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
288 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
273 Points -5%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
271 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (211 - 297, n=26)
269 Points -7%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
268 Points -7%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
263 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years)
258 Points -10%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
262 Seconds * -43%
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years)
253 Seconds * -38%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
233 Seconds * -27%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (166 - 268, n=24)
205 Seconds * -12%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
201 Seconds * -10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
197 Seconds * -8%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H
193 Seconds * -5%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
183 Seconds *
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
172 Seconds * +6%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
93 Seconds * +49%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
135927 MIPS +91%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
78016 MIPS +10%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
71121 MIPS
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H
70948 MIPS 0%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
70222 MIPS -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (45045 - 79032, n=25)
66435 MIPS -7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
64899 MIPS -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)
60219 MIPS -15%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
58703 MIPS -17%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
50517 MIPS -29%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
7319 MIPS +17%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H
6600 MIPS +5%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
6591 MIPS +5%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
6276 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3665 - 6600, n=25)
6054 MIPS -4%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
6041 MIPS -4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
5974 MIPS -5%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
5833 MIPS -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)
5716 MIPS -9%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
5590 MIPS -11%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
19583 Points +55%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
14566 Points +15%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H
14102 Points +11%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
13225 Points +5%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
12963 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
12652 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (9094 - 15410, n=26)
12649 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years)
12061 Points -5%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
10976 Points -13%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
10955 Points -13%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
2132 Points +10%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H
2003 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
2001 Points +3%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
1936 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (1140 - 2043, n=26)
1895 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
1878 Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
1869 Points -3%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
1854 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years)
1826 Points -6%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
1778 Points -8%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
34.8 fps +91%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
20.9 fps +15%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H
19.6 fps +8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
18.9 fps +4%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
18.7 fps +3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (14.1 - 22.3, n=25)
18.5 fps +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
18.2 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)
16.4 fps -10%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
15.7 fps -14%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
13.8 fps -24%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
60.4 s * -49%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years)
49.2 s * -21%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (34.4 - 82.8, n=25)
47.6 s * -17%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
46.1 s * -14%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
44.2 s * -9%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
42.8 s * -5%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
41.2 s * -1%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
41.1 s * -1%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
40.6 s *
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H
40.4 s * -0%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)
0.4845 sec * -10%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4587 sec * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (0.4052 - 0.723, n=25)
0.4493 sec * -2%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.447 sec * -2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4393 sec *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.4308 sec * +2%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4292 sec * +2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4067 sec * +7%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4052 sec * +8%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
0.3982 sec * +9%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2706 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
234 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
288 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6574 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
773 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1966 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
17236 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94.2 pt
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
92.3 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
89.4 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
 
86.9 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
85.4 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
81.8 pt
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
81.8 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
81.7 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
71.6 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15979 KRay/s +7%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
15746 KRay/s +5%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
15140 KRay/s +1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (6788 - 19557, n=25)
15135 KRay/s +1%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
14979 KRay/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
14781 KRay/s -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years)
14392 KRay/s -4%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
12817 KRay/s -14%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
12366 KRay/s -17%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88148 Points +24%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
79015 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (22551 - 95579, n=25)
76236 Points +7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
75181 Points +5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
73879 Points +4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years)
72601 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
71305 Points
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
64115 Points -10%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
61721 Points -13%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3989 MB/s +25%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3676 MB/s +15%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (2491 - 4270, n=25)
3561 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
3542 MB/s +11%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
3457 MB/s +8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years)
3385 MB/s +6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
3193 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
3016 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2850 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116624 Points +7%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
113464 Points +4%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
111168 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
109021 Points
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
107159 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
107064 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (65121 - 120936, n=25)
105169 Points -4%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
91588 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years)
90675 Points -17%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10498 Points +9%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
10412 Points +8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
9710 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9702 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (6108 - 11631, n=25)
9675 Points +1%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
9612 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years)
9325 Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
8708 Points -9%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
8278 Points -14%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
40277 Points +13%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
38948 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (11283 - 48474, n=25)
37712 Points +6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
36920 Points +3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
36674 Points +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years)
36124 Points +1%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
35720 Points
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
31971 Points -10%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
30137 Points -16%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
132544 MB/s +109%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
112823 MB/s +78%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3691 - 149377, n=25)
87238 MB/s +38%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81153 MB/s +28%
Average of class Multimedia
  (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years)
75931 MB/s +20%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
72654 MB/s +15%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
71745 MB/s +13%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
69002 MB/s +9%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
63380 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1206 MB/s +37%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
1093 MB/s +24%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1045 MB/s +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (789 - 1254, n=25)
1040 MB/s +18%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
1029 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
962 MB/s +9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years)
934 MB/s +6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
883 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
841 MB/s -5%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8599 KRay/s +8%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
8569 KRay/s +8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3655 - 10716, n=25)
8215 KRay/s +3%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8122 KRay/s +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
7971 KRay/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
7969 KRay/s 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years)
7814 KRay/s -2%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
6913 KRay/s -13%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
6587 KRay/s -17%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
52727 MPixel/s +31%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
48269 MPixel/s +20%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
43838 MPixel/s +9%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
42346 MPixel/s +5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
41106 MPixel/s +2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years)
40793 MPixel/s +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
40185 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (10871 - 50488, n=25)
39722 MPixel/s -1%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
29949 MPixel/s -25%

系统性能

在PCMark10和Crossmark的系统性能基准测试中,Zenbook Pro 14 Duo没有显示出任何弱点,在所有的子学科中提供了非常好的结果。在这里,更突出的是我们比较中的另一台笔记本电脑。这台Acer Predator Triton 300 SE、它更小,更轻,配备的硬件据说比上一代更弱,但却能一次又一次地领先于我们的华硕测试装置。凭借更高的TGP和TDP值,宏碁能够从处理器和图形芯片中挤出明显更高的性能。另一方面,宏碁的笔记本电脑也因此有了相当高的功率消耗。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
9151 Points +21%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (7578 - 7884, n=3)
7696 Points +2%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7620 Points +1%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7578 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7292 Points -4%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7273 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)
6789 Points -10%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6623 Points -13%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5948 Points -22%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
5726 Points -24%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
12176 Points +8%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
11549 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (11235 - 11539, n=3)
11424 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11235 Points
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
11132 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10990 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10861 Points -3%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
10569 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)
10515 Points -6%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10440 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
11833 Points +20%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10097 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (9888 - 10222, n=3)
10053 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9888 Points
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9390 Points -5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9274 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)
8919 Points -10%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8530 Points -14%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
7232 Points -27%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7024 Points -29%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
14432 Points +36%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (10418 - 11272, n=3)
10774 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10682 Points 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10632 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10447 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9627 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)
9194 Points -14%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8855 Points -17%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7401 Points -30%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
6667 Points -37%
CrossMark / Overall
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2078 Points +11%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1971 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (1874 - 1983, n=3)
1938 Points +3%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1874 Points
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1842 Points -2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1799 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1787 Points -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years)
1719 Points -8%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1654 Points -12%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
1492 Points -20%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1946 Points +9%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1877 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (1779 - 1889, n=3)
1842 Points +4%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1793 Points +1%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1779 Points
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1693 Points -5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1679 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years)
1628 Points -8%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1625 Points -9%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
1499 Points -16%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2377 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (2104 - 2195, n=3)
2152 Points +2%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2107 Points 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2104 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2044 Points -3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2016 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years)
1932 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1925 Points -9%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1727 Points -18%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
1507 Points -28%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1869 Points +21%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1725 Points +11%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1689 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (1548 - 1698, n=3)
1645 Points +6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1548 Points
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1533 Points -1%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1531 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years)
1441 Points -7%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1437 Points -7%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
1428 Points -8%
PCMark 10 Score
7578 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Multimedia
  (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years)
69078 MB/s +13%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (37448 - 74486, n=25)
61864 MB/s +1%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
61181 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Multimedia
  (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years)
70185 MB/s +22%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (41599 - 75433, n=25)
62438 MB/s +8%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
57722 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years)
70291 MB/s +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
69004 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (36152 - 88505, n=25)
65109 MB/s -6%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Multimedia
  (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years)
107 ns * -15%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
93.1 ns *
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (75.8 - 102.3, n=25)
89.3 ns * +4%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

使用本测试时的驱动程序,华硕Zenbook Pro 14 Duo的DPC延迟属于一个范围,可能导致实时视频和音频应用的问题。在音频应用中,1003微秒的延迟可能会导致可听到的停顿。

延迟监测
延迟监测
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
9037.2 μs * -801%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5418.4 μs * -440%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2698.9 μs * -169%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2089.1 μs * -108%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1273.3 μs * -27%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1003 μs *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
925.8 μs * +8%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
868.4 μs * +13%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

这里使用的具有2TB存储容量的三星PM9A1,即使在长时间内也能保持其高性能。在DiskSpd循环中,结果只相差1%。然而,我们也注意到,这里的固态硬盘的行为与我们迄今为止测试的同样使用这种固态硬盘的其他笔记本电脑有很大的不同。在随机读取和写入测试中,该存储解决方案在我们的测试单元中要比我们测试的三星PM9A1的平均速度慢得多。 SSD和HDD的基准列表.可能,三星可能使用了一些与以前不同的RAM芯片或存储控制器。

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read: 6923MB/s
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write: 5182MB/s
DiskSpd seq_read: 3873MB/s
DiskSpd seq_write: 3335MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read: 663MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write: 477MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read: 75.2MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write: 149.7MB/s
DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read: 6920MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
88.1 pt
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
81.5 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
 
81 pt
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE -11!
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
75 pt
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
72 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
67.1 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W -11!
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
65.8 pt
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
62.7 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
61.6 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
57 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2376 - 5676, n=32)
3898 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3878 (3830.24min - 3878.26max) MB/s 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3873 (3844.57min - 3872.62max) MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3626 (3582.77min - 3626.19max) MB/s -6%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3455 (3134.4min - 3455.07max) MB/s -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1629 - 4861, n=76, last 2 years)
2979 MB/s -23%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
2974 (2950.9min - 2974.18max) MB/s -23%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2762 (2451.7min - 2761.95max) MB/s -29%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2756 (2741.19min - 2756.29max) MB/s -29%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2582 (2345.38min - 2582.01max) MB/s -33%
seq write
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
4250 (4204.35min - 4249.88max) MB/s +27%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2370 - 7628, n=32)
4122 MB/s +24%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4000 (3970.36min - 3999.69max) MB/s +20%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3655 (3362.99min - 3654.53max) MB/s +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3440 (3380.56min - 3439.75max) MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
3338 (3184.11min - 3338.46max) MB/s 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3335 (3306.37min - 3334.51max) MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3266 (1415.26min - 3266.31max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (463 - 5711, n=76, last 2 years)
3127 MB/s -6%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2236 (2165.59min - 2236.4max) MB/s -33%
seq q8 t1 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3471 - 12556, n=32)
7102 MB/s +3%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
7048 (6068.56min - 7047.9max) MB/s +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6923 (5804.08min - 6923.33max) MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6876 (6162.32min - 6876.44max) MB/s -1%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
6868 (5469.58min - 6868.07max) MB/s -1%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6449 (5531.66min - 6449.16max) MB/s -7%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
6449 (5385.49min - 6448.53max) MB/s -7%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6067 (5416.73min - 6067.48max) MB/s -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2132 - 7126, n=76, last 2 years)
5465 MB/s -21%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
5134 (4615.2min - 5134.25max) MB/s -26%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6004 (5933.65min - 6004.3max) MB/s +16%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3537 - 10261, n=32)
5469 MB/s +6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5182 (5134.05min - 5181.56max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
5063 (4789.75min - 5062.73max) MB/s -2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5030 (5013.03min - 5029.6max) MB/s -3%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4970 (4966.69min - 4970.17max) MB/s -4%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4606 (4445.88min - 4605.99max) MB/s -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (555 - 6898, n=76, last 2 years)
4195 MB/s -19%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
4130 (4116.86min - 4129.71max) MB/s -20%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3742 (3596.76min - 3741.95max) MB/s -28%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
88.6 (88.22min - 88.59max) MB/s +18%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.4 (79.86min - 81.36max) MB/s +8%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
77.9 (72.17min - 77.89max) MB/s +4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (56.2 - 91.2, n=32)
77.5 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
76.3 (74.19min - 76.34max) MB/s +1%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
75.2 (69.76min - 75.19max) MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
70.5 (68.62min - 70.48max) MB/s -6%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
69.5 (67.9min - 69.5max) MB/s -8%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
64.3 (63.09min - 64.34max) MB/s -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14.6 - 97.7, n=76, last 2 years)
63.4 MB/s -16%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
313 (305.92min - 312.76max) MB/s +109%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
259 (255.34min - 258.92max) MB/s +73%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
224 (221.2min - 223.61max) MB/s +50%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (115.5 - 295, n=32)
214 MB/s +43%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
174.3 (169.24min - 174.29max) MB/s +16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (69.4 - 378, n=76, last 2 years)
172 MB/s +15%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
164.3 (163.26min - 164.34max) MB/s +10%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
149.7 (148.15min - 149.69max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
147.3 (146.61min - 147.27max) MB/s -2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
142.8 (136.31min - 142.75max) MB/s -5%
4k q32 t16 read
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3543 (3531.54min - 3542.72max) MB/s +434%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3484 (3457.82min - 3484.34max) MB/s +425%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (658 - 4075, n=32)
2876 MB/s +334%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2816 (2326.5min - 2816.32max) MB/s +325%
Average of class Multimedia
  (295 - 4881, n=76, last 2 years)
1407 MB/s +112%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1158 (1132.18min - 1157.71max) MB/s +75%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1006 (1000.34min - 1005.79max) MB/s +52%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
791 (762.43min - 791.09max) MB/s +19%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
729 (706.66min - 728.92max) MB/s +10%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
663 (656.45min - 663.21max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3594 (3143.37min - 3593.51max) MB/s +653%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2554 (2537.7min - 2554.39max) MB/s +435%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (387 - 3548, n=32)
2190 MB/s +359%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1556 (1408.86min - 1555.81max) MB/s +226%
Average of class Multimedia
  (192.1 - 4074, n=76, last 2 years)
1059 MB/s +122%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
542 (534.57min - 541.67max) MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
517 (507.17min - 517.15max) MB/s +8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
515 (507.16min - 514.77max) MB/s +8%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
481 (462.66min - 481.19max) MB/s +1%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
477 (463.61min - 476.76max) MB/s
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8363 Points
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
8118 Points
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3537 - 9031, n=31)
7222 Points
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6435 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5491 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (2033 - 9972, n=73, last 2 years)
5101 Points
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
5068 Points
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
5023 Points
Score Read
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3263 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3090 Points
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1224 - 3399, n=31)
2666 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (669 - 3501, n=73, last 2 years)
1646 Points
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1554 Points
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1517 Points
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
1468 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1465 Points
Score Write
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
4164 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3765 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3367 Points
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1081 - 3999, n=31)
3262 Points
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3205 Points
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2979 Points
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
2861 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (656 - 4813, n=73, last 2 years)
2674 Points
Seq Read
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5689 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2591 - 9971, n=31)
5479 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5315 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5017 MB/s
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
4836 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4493.54 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (1718 - 5730, n=73, last 2 years)
4257 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
4220 MB/s
Seq Write
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4062.33 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1900 - 8590, n=31)
3992 MB/s
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3904 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3766 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2793 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (414 - 5651, n=73, last 2 years)
2791 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
2754 MB/s
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
462 MB/s
4K Read
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
80.26 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
80.14 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
73.6 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (49.8 - 86.4, n=31)
72.4 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
67.4 MB/s
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
64 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (28.7 - 98.5, n=73, last 2 years)
62 MB/s
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
59.2 MB/s
4K Write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
238 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
206.22 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (112.6 - 254, n=31)
197.6 MB/s
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
197.5 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
192.61 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (66.5 - 328, n=73, last 2 years)
190.9 MB/s
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
189.7 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
179.8 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2733.5 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2478.53 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (662 - 2811, n=31)
2045 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (350 - 2989, n=73, last 2 years)
1158 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
978 MB/s
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
969 MB/s
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
925 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
890 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3584 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3195.52 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2908 MB/s
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2736 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (567 - 3414, n=31)
2665 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2592.88 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
2347 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (411 - 4265, n=73, last 2 years)
2204 MB/s
Access Time Read
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.061 ms *
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.018 - 0.15, n=73, last 2 years)
0.05499 ms *
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
0.046 ms *
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (0.018 - 0.078, n=31)
0.03406 ms *
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
0.029 ms *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.026 ms *
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.022 ms *
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
0.022 ms *
Access Time Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.013 - 0.414, n=73, last 2 years)
0.06101 ms *
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (0.017 - 0.092, n=31)
0.03371 ms *
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.022 ms *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.022 ms *
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
0.021 ms *
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
0.02 ms *
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
0.018 ms *
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.018 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB: Ø6920 (6432.52-6948.23)
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH: Ø2189 (453.55-6466.22)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø3882 (3285.33-6067.45)
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø6770 (4434.37-6888.93)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N: Ø7048 (6645.87-7075.48)
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW: Ø6844 (6600.37-6857.69)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH: Ø6426 (5723.55-6476.01)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00: Ø5053 (4209.82-5091.26)

图形卡

我们的测试配置配备了NvidiaGeForce RTX4060,它是目前华硕Zenbook Pro 14 Duo中最强大的图形芯片。在我们的测试装置中,该芯片能够消耗最大的55瓦特。由于有MUX开关,GeForce RTX 4060既可以单独运行,也可以与英特尔Core i9的iGPU一起运行。来自Nvidia的Ada Lovelace一代的中端芯片比它的前辈们明显更有效率。因此,Zenbook中的4060至少与宏碁掠夺者Triton 300 SE中的3060相当,尽管那能够多消耗40瓦的功率。然而,在电池操作中,该显卡只能提供其在主电源操作中的一半性能。

Time Spy 混合型
Time Spy 混合型
Time Spy 仅限dGPU
Time Spy 仅限dGPU
Time Spy 仅限dGPU,电池操作
Time Spy 仅限dGPU,电池操作
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
100 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
 
64.9 pt
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
60.6 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
54.2 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
50.8 pt
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
47.9 pt
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
39.6 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
35.2 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
32.1 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
25.6 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
62240 Points +108%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
40004 Points +34%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (28136 - 38912, n=56)
34832 Points +16%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
29908 Points
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
28200 Points -6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
26724 Points -11%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
23303 Points -22%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
20485 Points -32%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=77, last 2 years)
20238 Points -32%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
16904 Points -43%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (81407 - 180228, n=28)
149832 Points +22%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
122393 Points
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
115191 Points -6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
100864 Points -18%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
91970 Points -25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14679 - 130614, n=38, last 2 years)
56887 Points -54%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
47798 Points +115%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
29051 Points +31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (20533 - 29656, n=53)
25748 Points +16%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
22184 Points
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
20533 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
20405 Points -8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
17256 Points -22%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
17061 Points -23%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=80, last 2 years)
14545 Points -34%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
12349 Points -44%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
20033 Points +146%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
11398 Points +40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (7484 - 11451, n=55)
9936 Points +22%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
8129 Points
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
7763 Points -5%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
7655 Points -6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
6418 Points -21%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
5675 Points -30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=81, last 2 years)
5488 Points -32%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
4773 Points -41%
3DMark 11 Performance
27133 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
155098 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
58342 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
19869 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
8514 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
53 Seconds * -96%
Average of class Multimedia
  (19 - 105, n=45, last 2 years)
42.3 Seconds * -57%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
35 Seconds * -30%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
34 Seconds * -26%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
31 Seconds * -15%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
28 Seconds * -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
27 Seconds *
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
23 Seconds * +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (19 - 28, n=52)
23 Seconds * +15%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
13 Seconds * +52%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
91 Seconds * -82%
Average of class Multimedia
  (32 - 181, n=47, last 2 years)
73.4 Seconds * -47%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
62 Seconds * -24%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
61 Seconds * -22%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
56 Seconds * -12%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
53 Seconds * -6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
50 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (39 - 53, n=53)
43.2 Seconds * +14%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
37 Seconds * +26%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
20 Seconds * +60%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
456 Seconds * -39%
Average of class Multimedia
  (167 - 946, n=86, last 2 years)
425 Seconds * -30%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
420 Seconds * -28%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
352 Seconds * -7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
348 Seconds * -6%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
340 Seconds * -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
328 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (189 - 452, n=52)
311 Seconds * +5%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
304 Seconds * +7%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
147 Seconds * +55%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

在我们的测试中,Zenbook Pro 14 Duo适用于高清游戏,几乎没有任何限制。但由于只有8GB的图形存储空间,即使在低分辨率下,目前最流行的游戏也会产生一些问题。在原生显示分辨率下,在许多游戏中至少可以超过30FPS,而光线追踪清楚地显示了中端GPU的极限。因此,总的来说,这款笔记本电脑也适合游戏,但纯游戏笔记本电脑应该能够提供明显更高的性能。

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
100 pt
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75.9 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
68.4 pt
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
62.6 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 -1!
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
59.8 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
58.5 pt
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
52.3 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
43.5 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
39.6 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
178.6 (172min, 173P1) fps +25%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
143.2 fps
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105.3 (99min, 100P1) fps -26%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
77 fps -46%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
75 (69min) fps -48%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
71 fps -50%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
67.7 (63min, 65P1) fps -53%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
66 (62min, 63P1) fps -54%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)
54.6 fps -62%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
44.2 (42min, 42P1) fps -69%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
134 (7.27min, 90.9P1) fps +55%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117.7 (4.18min, 76.9P1) fps +36%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
99.6 (5.85min, 66.7P1) fps +15%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
86.5 (7.43min, 55.6P1) fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
78.7 (6.43min, 50P1) fps -9%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
76.9 (3.91min, 47.6P1) fps -11%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
74.3 (2.72min, 47.6P1) fps -14%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
67.5 (9.08min, 43.5P1) fps -22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years)
53.6 fps -38%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
169.6 fps +102%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
108.3 fps +29%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
84 fps
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
79.1 fps -6%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
75.1 fps -11%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
59.9 fps -29%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
58.5 fps -30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.53 - 141.8, n=81, last 2 years)
51.4 fps -39%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
50.1 fps -40%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
333 (38min, 227P1) fps +115%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
194 fps +25%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
155.2 (31.9min, 117.3P1) fps
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
138.6 (37.8min, 106P1) fps -11%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
135.3 (16min, 97P1) fps -13%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
100.2 (67.8min, 76.1P1) fps -35%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 233, n=80, last 2 years)
88.5 fps -43%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
86 (52.1min, 63.8P1) fps -45%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
179.7 (153.7min) fps +24%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
162.2 (139.5min) fps +12%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
153.6 (134.8min) fps +6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
148 (129.7min) fps +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
144.9 (127min) fps
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
139.3 (121.8min) fps -4%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
129.1 (114min) fps -11%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
109.1 (95.7min) fps -25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (26.3 - 179.9, n=82, last 2 years)
96.2 fps -34%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
117.8 fps +12%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
113.4 fps +8%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
105.4 fps
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
104 fps -1%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
103.6 fps -2%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
101 fps -4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
100.9 fps -4%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
98.2 fps -7%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
97.6 fps -7%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
82.3 fps -22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 141.1, n=82, last 2 years)
66.7 fps -37%
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 183.5 153.7 86.5 64.9 60.1
The Witcher 3 (2015) 333 176.4 163.5 143.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 188.8 166.9 161.7 144.9 95.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 171 116.9 84 61 34.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 154.9 135 105.4 95.2
Strange Brigade (2018) 420 226 181.8 155.2
F1 22 (2022) 199.2 189.2 145.5 52.4

排放--AAS的冷却装置变得很响

噪声水平

看一下AAS的冷却系统
看一下AAS的冷却系统

通过使用各种功率配置文件,你可以在一个非常安静或非常强大但也很吵的笔记本电脑之间切换。在性能模式下,我们确定在15厘米(约6英寸)的距离上,最大噪音水平超过60分贝(A)。风扇的噪音在笔记本前面听起来明显比其他笔记本要大得多。这可能是由于AAS系统的缘故,我们在笔记本电脑的侧面感受到了比许多其他笔记本电脑更强的气流,当它们必须产生其最高性能时。
另一方面,Zenbook在日常操作中几乎总是保持非常安静,只有当笔记本电脑的显卡和处理器必须提供其全部性能时,风扇才转到全速。在中等负荷下,我们测得的噪音只有32 dB(A),非常安静。

Noise Level

Idle
25.2 / 25.2 / 32.5 dB(A)
Load
59.7 / 60.9 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25.2 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2020.124.831.321.720.12523.628.536.427.923.63126.628.638.730.226.64023.826.234.525.623.8503030.835.433.2306323.822.333.622.123.88017.620.426.916.617.610016.821.426.321.216.812516.626.228.216.516.616016.425.428.315.216.42001625.324.913.61625016.829.529.113.616.831519.532.933.817.219.540017.830.831.612.317.850018.734.734.711.918.763018.635.936.811.218.680019.439.340.112.419.4100022.344.544.911.722.3125023.846.64711.623.8160019.943.844.911.819.9200019.844.345.212.319.8250019.845.646.712.619.8315019.445.947.113.319.440002048.749.913.32050002148.349.713.621630022.751.75313.722.7800018.752.754.114.518.71000016.853.454.71516.81250015.547.448.514.115.51600013.437.238.712.913.4SPL32.559.760.925.232.5N1.712.513.40.61.7median 18.7median 43.8median 44.9median 13.3median 18.7Delta2.28.48.51.72.236.733.535.539.33328.926.932.829.629.225.32827.528.624.426.325.527.728.425.42626.424.52827.331.430.722.923.628.627.227.225.826.726.727.223.421.524.227.527.623.118.920.828.129.623.116.516.129.532.524.115.115.832.334.624.514.115.433.936.927.317.118.737.339.428.81516.439.24029.412.313.439.942.730.110.711.942.345.7349.910.245.348.936.89.99.648.948.433.79.79.748.148.733.39.89.948.849.433.210.210.149.447.83110.710.347.748.231.71110.74849.933.411.911.149.749.732.41211.249.648.827.812.411.448.748.823.813.112.548.445.621.713.111.845.542.620.112.211.642.538.520.811.210.838.560.144.223.823.86013.84.60.50.513.7median 45.6median 28.8median 12.2median 11.6median 45.36.84.92.32.86.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021WAcer Predator Triton 300 SE
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
Noise
9%
11%
4%
1%
12%
18%
17%
off / environment *
25.2
23.8
6%
22.9
9%
24
5%
23.9
5%
24.4
3%
23.3
8%
24
5%
Idle Minimum *
25.2
23.8
6%
22.9
9%
24
5%
23.9
5%
24.4
3%
23.3
8%
24
5%
Idle Average *
25.2
23.8
6%
22.9
9%
24
5%
32.9
-31%
24.4
3%
23.3
8%
24
5%
Idle Maximum *
32.5
30.6
6%
36.8
-13%
35.71
-10%
36.5
-12%
27.8
14%
23.3
28%
24
26%
Load Average *
59.7
44.2
26%
43.7
27%
42.9
28%
43.3
27%
39.3
34%
38.61
35%
Load Maximum *
60.9
60
1%
46.2
24%
51.93
15%
56
8%
48.8
20%
48.8
20%
43.59
28%
Witcher 3 ultra *
60.1
46.2
40.22
51.2
48.2
48.8
41.24

* ... smaller is better

温度

由于这款笔记本缺少掌托,而且你无论如何都很难在腿上使用它,所以你也不必像以前那样关注笔记本的表面温度。但仍然值得一提的是,Zenbook可以保持大部分舒适的表面温度。只有Screenpad+和键盘之间的一小块地带在上面达到了40℃(104°F)以上。在我们的底部热图中,你可以看到CPU和GPU之间的热管闪闪发光。当我们用温度传感器测量时,网格处的温度更接近40℃(104°F)。

Max. Load
 27 °C27.1 °C26 °C 
 31.4 °C32.6 °C30.6 °C 
 37.1 °C35.2 °C33.3 °C 
Maximum: 37.1 °C
Average: 31.1 °C
39.5 °C49.4 °C37.6 °C
34.8 °C45.5 °C40.1 °C
36.3 °C40.2 °C36.8 °C
Maximum: 49.4 °C
Average: 40 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 22.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.1 °C / 98.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-8.3 °C / -15 F).
顶部--空闲操作
顶部--空闲操作
底部--空载运行
底部--空载运行
顶部--压力测试
顶部--压力测试
底部--压力测试
底部--压力测试
顶部------。Witcher 3
顶部------。Witcher 3
底部--TheWitcher 3
底部--TheWitcher 3
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Heat
2%
1%
3%
-1%
-8%
1%
2%
Maximum Upper Side *
37.1
43
-16%
41.6
-12%
42
-13%
44.2
-19%
48.4
-30%
40.6
-9%
42
-13%
Maximum Bottom *
49.4
46.4
6%
55.7
-13%
52
-5%
46.8
5%
57.1
-16%
49.5
-0%
47
5%
Idle Upper Side *
30
28.2
6%
25.9
14%
26
13%
29.2
3%
28.1
6%
28.2
6%
27
10%
Idle Bottom *
32.4
28.4
12%
28
14%
27
17%
30.2
7%
29
10%
30.6
6%
30
7%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在压力测试大约5分钟后,CPU和GPU的功耗分别达到35瓦和45瓦。然后两个芯片都达到了恒定的70℃(158°F)。在Prime95和FurMark长达一小时的负载中,我们没有看到性能、时钟速度或温度的任何明显波动。

压力测试日志
压力测试日志
冷却阶段
冷却阶段

发言人

在测试过程中测量扬声器时,我们确定它们几乎没有提供任何低音,而高音明显被过度强调了。但至少,你可以使用Windows中的均衡器来调整高电平。尽管在66dB(A)的音量下,Zenbook的两个扬声器的平均音量明显高于笔记本电脑的风扇,但它们的声音并不总是能够穿过风扇的噪音。有时,通过蓝牙或3.5毫米音频端口连接的耳机似乎是这里更好的选择。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.121.727.12536.427.936.43138.630.238.64036.625.636.6503333.233633322.1338027.416.627.410035.321.235.312542.116.542.116046.715.246.72004413.64425049.613.649.631559.717.259.740066.112.366.150066.111.966.163062.811.262.880066.212.466.210006811.768125067.311.667.3160065.911.865.9200068.812.368.8250068.312.668.3315063.913.363.940006513.36550006713.667630071.313.771.3800078.314.578.3100008115811250076.814.176.81600070.512.970.5SPL83.725.283.7N53.80.653.8median 66.1median 13.3median 66.1Delta4.81.74.826.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021WApple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--76Wh的长电池寿命

消耗功率

在某些情况下,华硕Zenbook Pro 14 Duo明显比其竞争对手更有效率。至少在配备dGPU的竞争对手中,该笔记本电脑处于中间位置。华硕的 RTX 4060 在这里也显示,它能够比RTX 3060明显更有效地运行 RTX 3060.在相同的负载下,Zenbook的功耗仍然明显低于RTX 3060的功耗。 Acer Predator Triton.

华硕为Zenbook配备了一个180瓦的电源。我们测量了所有负载条件下的最大功耗为140瓦,因此所附的电源提供了足够的功率。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 3.5 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 8.5 / 8.8 / 16.5 Watt
Load midlight 102 / 140 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5"
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5"
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, MiniLED, 2560x1600, 16"
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5"
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
-23%
-1%
21%
-128%
12%
-9%
1%
-37%
12%
Idle Minimum *
8.5
7.6
11%
7.6
11%
7.4
13%
19.2
-126%
7.5
12%
7.5
12%
8.5
-0%
11.6 ?(3 - 33, n=47)
-36%
Idle Average *
8.8
12.3
-40%
13.3
-51%
8.3
6%
29.7
-238%
10.4
-18%
11.1
-26%
12.4
-41%
16.1 ?(6.9 - 35, n=47)
-83%
Idle Maximum *
16.5
17.6
-7%
13.7
17%
8.7
47%
30.8
-87%
11.4
31%
11.6
30%
13.3
19%
20.4 ?(7.6 - 45, n=47)
-24%
Load Average *
102
111
-9%
88.2
14%
76
25%
126
-24%
83.3
18%
91.9
10%
93
9%
93.1 ?(59 - 190, n=46)
9%
Witcher 3 ultra *
101.2
117.1
-16%
94.2
7%
70
31%
258
-155%
92.7
8%
132.2
-31%
87.8
13%
Load Maximum *
140
245.8
-76%
143
-2%
132
6%
330
-136%
110.3
21%
208
-49%
135
4%
210 ?(99 - 364, n=47)
-50%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø101.2 (98.3-104.6)
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø122.7 (102.4-168.1)
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø10.7 (5.5-16.4)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø106.9 (102.3-120.4)
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø116.9 (115.2-118.1)
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø87.8 (22.6-100.8)
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø99.2 (95.4-103.6)
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø13.1 (9.62-19.6)

电池寿命

Zenbook Pro 14 Duo电池
Zenbook Pro 14 Duo电池

根据笔记本电脑的使用场景和负载,我们也得到了非常不同的运行时间。 在我们的Wi-Fi网上冲浪测试中,在150cd/m²的显示亮度下,我们停用了第二个显示屏,结果Zenbook Pro 14 Duo在离开充电器后持续了9个小时。在两个显示器都处于全亮度的情况下,则少了三个半小时。两个测试都使用了混合GPU模式,其中Nvidia图形芯片可以停用。在中等负荷下的Battery Eater测试中,76瓦时的电池仍可维持三个多小时。根据使用场景,这款笔记本电脑适合于移动使用。在路上,你也可以使用USB-C充电器为Zenbook充电,尽管这至少应该提供45瓦的功率,以便能够在笔记本电脑运行期间仍然为电池充电。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
9h 02min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
5h 32min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 32min
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
-48%
-34%
-65%
-15%
-18%
WiFi v1.3
542
374
-31%
595
10%
238
-56%
607
12%
Load
212
77
-64%
49
-77%
57
-73%
124
-42%
Reader / Idle
486
H.264
742
230
666

Pros

+ 精确的彩色OLED显示屏
+ 第二次显示
+ 高性能等级
+ 可实现较长的电池寿命
+ 两个显示屏都支持手写笔

Cons

- 响亮的AAS冷却系统
- 对桌面的空间要求增加
- 没有桌子,几乎不可能移动使用
- 几乎没有任何扩展选项
- 室外使用只可能在有限的范围内进行

评语 - 并不适合所有人

Zenbook Pro 14 Duo--华硕提供的测试装置
Zenbook Pro 14 Duo--华硕提供的测试装置

凭借其设备,Zenbook Pro 14 Duo为许多应用场景做好了准备。硬件方面,它采用了强大的 英特尔酷睿i9-13900HNvidiaGeForce RTX 4060,在Zenbook中也提供了更高的性能。有了副显示屏,笔记本电脑的生产力可以得到显著提高。然而,由于其不寻常的布局,这款笔记本电脑并不像其他设备那样移动。如果它留在桌面上是最好的,但它在那里也需要比其他笔记本电脑更多的空间。在火车、飞机或演讲厅的小桌子上,Zenbook Pro 14 Duo的空间会变得紧张,它显然失去了作为14.5英寸笔记本电脑的移动优势。

即使你可以通过第二块显示屏提高生产力,你也需要更多的空间来容纳Zenbook Pro 14 Duo。

与其他14或15英寸的笔记本电脑相比,AAS冷却系统并没有带来任何明显的优势,这让笔记本电脑的高性能受到了损害。无论是在性能上,还是在功耗或温度上,Zenbook Pro 14 Duo都不能明显领先于竞争对手。
因此,华硕为该笔记本开出的3600欧元(约3,871美元)的价格只有在你能充分利用第二个显示屏的情况下才是合理的。否则,像 联想Yoga Pro 7华硕VivoBook S 14X可能是一个更好的选择。

价格和可用性

Zenbook Pro 14 Duo可从制造商,起价约2000美元。在美国。配备NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060,Zenbook Pro 14 Duo的价格约为2,400美元。从制造商那里。亚马逊目前还列出了一个配备RTX 3050 Ti的版本,价格约为2200美元。

Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W - 05/31/2023 v7 (old)
Marc Herter

Chassis
85 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
82%
Pointing Device
95%
Connectivity
64 / 80 → 80%
Weight
65 / 20-72 → 87%
Battery
85 / 95 → 90%
Display
90%
Games Performance
98 / 90 → 100%
Application Performance
96 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
89%
Noise
56 / 95 → 59%
Audio
77%
Camera
48 / 85 → 57%
Average
79%
87%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕ZenBook Pro 14 Duo笔记本电脑评测,为创意者提供第二块显示屏:提高生产力
Marc Herter, 2023-06-11 (Update: 2023-06-11)