酷睿i7-13700HX性能首次亮相:联合利华GM6PX7X IDX笔记本评测
Uniwill GM6PX7X是一款16英寸白牌游戏笔记本设计,在一些市场上被称为 申科XMG Neo 16 E23.它是在2023年CES上与移动式第13代猛禽湖-H系列和移动式Ada LovelaceGeForce RTX 40系列一起曝光的较新机型。
像大多数其他Uniwill或Schenker型号一样,GM6PX7X是高度可配置的,CPU选项高达Core i9-13900HX,GPU选项从到移动GeForce RTX 4060到4090不等。我们的具体审查单位是一个中端配置,配备了Core i7-13700HX和RTX 4070。
关于机箱的更多信息,请参见我们对搭载RTX 4090的Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23的全面评测,而搭载RTX 4070的Uniwill GM6PX7X也采用了同样的设计。然而,它们之间有几个物理差异,我们将在下面指出。
更多Uniwill/Schenker评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.2 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 22 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.7 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 29.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 30.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.4 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.2 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 18 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
91.2 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 21.99 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
Schenker XMG Neo 16有两个机箱版本:一个较薄的构建用于所有RTX 4060和4070配置,一个较厚的构建用于所有RTX 4080和4090配置。移动RTX 4080/4090 GPU比移动RTX 4060/4070更耗电,因此它们需要更大的机箱尺寸。这两个版本之间的主要区别包括:
- 厚度:22毫米对26.1毫米
- 重量:2.2公斤vs. 2.5公斤
- 电池容量:62Wh vs. 99Wh
- 网络摄像头:100万像素对200万像素
- 交流适配器:280瓦对330瓦
两种构建方式在其他方面共享相同的键盘选项(薄膜或Cherry MX机械)、点击板、端口、显示器和机箱材料。
SD卡阅读器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
沟通
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
网络摄像头
维护
显示
这种特殊的机箱设计没有第二个显示选项,因此我们的Uniwill采用了与RTX 4090驱动的Schenker Neo 16相同的BOE NE160QDM-NZ1 IPS面板。该面板因其快速的240赫兹刷新率和>95%的sRGB覆盖率而备受关注。尽管如此,竞争对手的笔记本电脑,如华硕ROG Strix G16或Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED提供更深的色彩和更快的响应时间,铁杆游戏玩家或图形编辑可以欣赏。
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 338.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 1058:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.18 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
68.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 BOE0AF0 NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ TL160ADMP03-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 24% | 3% | 31% | 27% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.5 | 67.3 0% | 97 44% | 69.1 2% | 99.9 48% | 98.5 46% |
sRGB Coverage | 96.4 | 96.7 0% | 99.9 4% | 99.7 3% | 100 4% | 100 4% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.6 | 68.9 0% | 84.9 24% | 71.2 4% | 96.4 41% | 89.7 31% |
Response Times | -2% | 47% | 21% | 82% | 13% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 12.6 ? | 14.5 ? -15% | 5.1 ? 60% | 12.3 ? 2% | 2 ? 84% | 6.6 ? 48% |
Response Time Black / White * | 9.8 ? | 8.6 ? 12% | 6.6 ? 33% | 5.9 ? 40% | 1.98 ? 80% | 12 ? -22% |
PWM Frequency | 60 | |||||
Screen | 9% | 16% | 33% | 142% | 8% | |
Brightness middle | 338.6 | 372 10% | 470 39% | 511 51% | 389.97 15% | 456.8 35% |
Brightness | 328 | 349 6% | 459 40% | 469 43% | 395 20% | 437 33% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 88 -1% | 93 4% | 86 -3% | 97 9% | 83 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.32 -0% | 0.42 -31% | 0.4 -25% | 0.03 91% | 0.35 -9% |
Contrast | 1058 | 1163 10% | 1119 6% | 1278 21% | 12999 1129% | 1305 23% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.18 | 2.06 6% | 1.86 15% | 0.95 56% | 2 8% | 3.7 -70% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.14 | 3 58% | 3.87 46% | 2.07 71% | 4.1 43% | 6.42 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.93 | 1.5 -61% | 0.93 -0% | 0.91 2% | 1.68 -81% | 0.66 29% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 1.9 49% | 2.7 27% | 0.6 84% | 2.23 40% | 2.6 30% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.312 95% | 2.246 98% | 2.176 101% | 2.41 91% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 7245 90% | 6747 96% | 6711 97% | 6545 99% | 6323 103% | 6108 106% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
5% | 29% /
22% | 19% /
25% | 85% /
109% | 16% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
这款显示器开箱即被校准,平均灰度和色彩deltaE值分别为3.7和2.18。然而,色温略微偏冷,这是我们自己的X-Rite校准的问题。用户可以应用我们上面的校准过的ICM配置文件,从Uniwill中获得更准确的颜色。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
9.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.1 ms rise | |
↘ 4.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
12.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.3 ms rise | |
↘ 6.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
业绩
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前,我们通过预装的控制中心软件将我们的设备设置为涡轮模式,并关闭Optimus。该系统不支持高级优化模式,这意味着在独立GPU和优化模式之间切换时需要重新启动。我们鼓励用户熟悉预装的控制中心软件,因为它是调整性能配置文件、Optimus等的枢纽。
内部显示器不支持G-Sync。
处理器
在测试了几款采用13代酷睿i9处理器的发烧级游戏笔记本电脑后,我们终于可以看到中端酷睿i7-13700HX处理器的规模。基准测试显示,它比上一代的第12代酷睿i7-13700HX处理器快了大约25%。 酷睿i7-12700H通常在2022年的大多数中端到高端游戏笔记本电脑上发现。升级到 酷睿i9-13900HX配置,预计将相当显著地提高性能,达到35%。
总体性能远远领先于任何移动Zen 3+ CPU,而最新的Zen 4Ryzen 9 7945HX 仍然是更快的处理器,速度为20%至50%。性能稳定性很好,在受压时没有大的时钟频率波动。
关于Core i7-13700HX的更多技术细节和基准比较,可以在我们的专门网页,这里 。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (15397 - 21999, n=10) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (77807 - 109364, n=10) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (3412 - 5053, n=10) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (105112 - 114717, n=10) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (10407 - 13519, n=10) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (38311 - 53484, n=10) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (72510 - 182575, n=10) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (981 - 1451, n=10) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (8145 - 11837, n=10) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (20471 - 42415, n=10) |
系统性能
PCMark的结果与其他运行在13代酷睿CPU和GeForce 40 GPU上的高端游戏笔记本电脑相当,如技嘉AERO 16或 Razer Blade 16.分数一直领先于运行在旧版Zen 3+和GeForce 30硬件上的Schenker XMG Neo 15。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
PCMark 10 Score | 8486 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (36504 - 63990, n=10) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (36510 - 69729, n=10) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (33598 - 85675, n=10) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (81.9 - 97.9, n=10) | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示了在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时的DPC问题。在60FPS下的4K视频播放是完美的,CPU和GPU利用率低,没有丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试装置配备了一个PCIe4 x4的 三星PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQNVMe SSD,支持6700MB/s的连续读取率。快速的速率也是可持续的,在压力下没有性能下降。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
在测试了少数几款 GeForce RTX 4060, 4070, 4080 和 4090 到目前为止,这些笔记本电脑之间的预期性能差异正在变得清晰。关于140瓦的移动RTX 4070,用户可以预期它的性能比移动RTX 4060快15%到20%,或者比175瓦的移动RTX 4080慢大约30%到35%。因此,移动RTX4070和移动RTX4080之间的性能差距要比移动RTX4060和RTX4070之间的差距大很多。这可能是Nvidia鼓励潜在买家考虑更高端的4080或4090配置的方式。
从移动RTX 4070升级到175W的移动RTX 4090选项,可将原始性能提高约55%至80%。像《赛博朋克2077》或《F1 22》这样要求极高的4K游戏在移动RTX 4070上运行得并不好,除非支持DLSS或帧生成。
3DMark 11 Performance | 35877 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 29083 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 12988 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Master | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 187 | 186.9 | 183.1 | 124.8 | 93.1 | 93.6 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 606.3 | 430.3 | 260.5 | 123.2 | 78.8 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 213 | 187.9 | 187.2 | 170.2 | 146.6 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 227 | 177.3 | 121.2 | 88.6 | 48.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 189.4 | 165.6 | 129.2 | 109.2 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 567 | 332 | 255 | 217 | 143.3 | 75.3 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 182.8 | 152.9 | 115.1 | 93.6 | 55.6 | 24.4 |
F1 22 (2022) | 310 | 306 | 231 | 83.1 | 53.8 | 26.5 |
排放
系统噪音
风扇噪音取决于电源配置文件和GPU设置。例如,如果在独立GPU模式下,在桌面上空转时,风扇噪音将稳定在29 dB(A),而安静的背景为22.4 dB(A)。相比之下,如果在Optimus模式下,风扇的噪音会小得多,只有22.9 dB(A)。因此,你会希望将系统保持在Optimus模式下,用于网页浏览或视频流等要求不高的任务。
运行 Witcher 3在性能模式下运行dGPU将导致风扇噪音略低于49 dB(A),这比许多其他16英寸游戏笔记本电脑更安静,包括更厚的RTX 4090-powered Neo 16 或联想Legion Pro 7 16.尽管如此,如果标题的要求更高,风扇噪音仍然可以达到更响亮的55 dB(A)。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 22.9 / 29 / 29 dB(A) |
Load |
| 40.2 / 55 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.4 dB(A) |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -25% | -6% | -10% | -6% | 6% | |
off / environment * | 22.4 | 25 -12% | 25 -12% | 24 -7% | 23 -3% | 23 -3% |
Idle Minimum * | 22.9 | 31 -35% | 26 -14% | 26 -14% | 23 -0% | 23 -0% |
Idle Average * | 29 | 33 -14% | 28 3% | 28 3% | 23 21% | 23 21% |
Idle Maximum * | 29 | 42 -45% | 30 -3% | 34 -17% | 33.64 -16% | 23.6 19% |
Load Average * | 40.2 | 58 -44% | 48 -19% | 47 -17% | 51.49 -28% | 39 3% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.7 | 57 -17% | 49 -1% | 55 -13% | 55.27 -13% | 51.6 -6% |
Load Maximum * | 55 | 59 -7% | 52 5% | 56 -2% | 55.24 -0% | 51.3 7% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
与其他16英寸游戏笔记本电脑相比,游戏时的表面温度相对较低。华硕华硕ROG Strix G16例如,可以达到54℃以上,而Uniwill的热点顶部为40℃,底部为45℃。在类似的游戏负载下,温度比搭载RTX 4090的Neo 16的温度还要低几摄氏度。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.4 °C / 79.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.5 °C / 4.5 F).
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 2% | -8% | -9% | 16% | 9% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 38.2 | 50 -31% | 54 -41% | 48 -26% | 41 -7% | 40 -5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45 | 51 -13% | 55 -22% | 49 -9% | 47 -4% | 37.6 16% |
Idle Upper Side * | 33.6 | 28 17% | 29 14% | 40 -19% | 23 32% | 32.4 4% |
Idle Bottom * | 39.6 | 26 34% | 33 17% | 33 17% | 23 42% | 31.4 21% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当在Prime95下受压时,CPU仅在最初几分钟内会提升到4GHz和130W。此后,时钟频率和电路板功耗将下降到3.4 GHz和122 W,分别。核心温度将徘徊在90摄氏度左右,即使对游戏笔记本电脑来说也是非常温暖的。例如,在Razer Blade 16上运行同样的测试,将导致CPU温度更接近于80℃。
运行Witcher 3 ,CPU和GPU的温度将分别稳定在83℃和73℃,而Blade 16的温度为78℃。GPU板的功耗将稳定在100W,而TGP的额定功率为140W。
如同预期的那样,用电池供电运行限制了性能。在电池上进行的Fire Strike 测试,物理和图形得分分别为9314和11777分,而在电源上则为36091和31354分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 41 | 45 |
Prime95压力 | 3.4 - 4.0 | -- | 89 | 55 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | ~3.5 | 1275 - 2350 | 93 | 63 |
Witcher 3 应力 | ~1450 | 2370 | 83 | 73 |
发言人
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
消耗功率
在所有情况下,功耗应该低于配备了更快的RTX 4090的Neo 16,但奇怪的是,这不是真的。在桌面上空转会需要12瓦到32瓦,而配备RTX 4090的Neo 16只有8瓦和28瓦。我们仔细检查了我们的电源配置文件和亮度设置,但结果并没有改善。
运行更高的负载,如游戏,比Neo 16的功耗低24%至37%。移动RTX 4070比移动RTX 4090慢35%到45%左右,所以耗电量低并不意外。
同时运行Prime95和FurMark会导致消耗量从低至167瓦到298瓦的严重循环,即使大型(约18 x 8.4 x 3.5厘米)AC适配器的额定功率为280瓦。在配备RTX 4090的Neo 16上重复这一测试时,消耗量会更加稳定,如下图所示。
Off / Standby | 0.19 / 3.8 Watt |
Idle | 12.6 / 17.7 / 31.8 Watt |
Load |
101.4 / 298 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -13% | -5% | -26% | 19% | -25% | |
Idle Minimum * | 12.6 | 8 37% | 10 21% | 18 -43% | 11.8 6% | 15.2 -21% |
Idle Average * | 17.7 | 18 -2% | 16 10% | 24 -36% | 16.1 9% | 22.8 -29% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.8 | 28 12% | 27 15% | 32 -1% | 17 47% | 49.8 -57% |
Load Average * | 101.4 | 133 -31% | 129 -27% | 130 -28% | 100.6 1% | 121.2 -20% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 185.3 | 294 -59% | 247 -33% | 260 -40% | 158 15% | 242 -31% |
Load Maximum * | 298 | 399 -34% | 342 -15% | 320 -7% | 192 36% | 273.7 8% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
电池容量比搭载RTX 4090的Neo 16小三分之一,用于缩短WLAN电池寿命,约为4小时。相比之下,其他大多数16英寸游戏笔记本的电池容量和运行时间都比较大。
从空电到满电只需要不到两个小时。我们的USB-C充电器都无法为笔记本电脑充电。
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 88 Wh | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 66% | 142% | 26% | 86% | 51% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 241 | 399 66% | 583 142% | 303 26% | 448 86% | 365 51% |
H.264 | 349 | 442 | ||||
Witcher 3 ultra | 84 | |||||
Load | 65 | 124 | 126 | 81 | ||
Reader / Idle | 385 | 533 |
Pros
Cons
判决书
Uniwill GM6PX7X是一款可靠的16英寸游戏笔记本电脑,即使它在任何特定类别中都不突出。例如,该系统很轻,但 技嘉Aero 16是更轻的。色彩覆盖率接近100%的sRGB,但甚至更深的P3颜色可在华硕ROG Strix G16或Razer Blade 16.图形性能对于这个尺寸来说是很好的,但内部显示器缺乏高级优化或G-Sync支持是体验上的一个障碍。支持基于区域的RGB背光,但每键RGB照明与可选的Cherry机械升级相联系。同时,配置更快的GeForce RTX 4080或4090需要一个更厚、更重的机箱,这否定了Uniwill GM6PX7X设计的一个关键优势。Uniwill GM6PX7X没有明显的弱点或突出的特点,这使它有一种一致性的感觉,一些游戏玩家可能会喜欢。
Uniwill GM6PX7X是一款不折不扣的游戏笔记本,在大多数类别中都高于平均水平,但它缺乏有助于从人群中脱颖而出的动力或引人注目的功能。
我们仍然可以赞扬该机型的全尺寸数字键盘和方向键,以及对可选外部水冷器的罕见支持。这些相同的键盘按键在其他游戏笔记本上往往更小、更拥挤。发烧友可能想考虑更高端的RTX 4080或4090 SKU,以更好地利用可选的水冷。
价格和可用性
Uniwill GM6PX7X现在正以几个不同的名字和价格发货,这取决于地区。例如,申克公司以XMG Neo 16的品牌名称提供该底盘。
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070
- 03/28/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.