2024 年最佳拍照智能手机Android - vivo X200 Pro 评测
超级拍照手机
vivo X200 Pro 的蔡司摄像头和旗舰处理器为其提供了强大的照片质量和卓越的性能。OLED 显示屏的亮度也令人难以置信，在我们的测试中超过了 4,800 尼特。请阅读我们对这款 vivo 手机的评测，了解它的不足之处。Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
判决
如果您正在寻找目前Android 市场上最好的智能手机之一，那么 vivo X200 Pro 绝对是您的不二之选。制造商在许多方面对其旗舰手机进行了改进，包括更好的指纹传感器、运行时间明显更长的现代电池，甚至一些小的方面也进行了优化，例如现在可以通过 USB 端口进行有线图像输出。
新的 Dimensity 9400 在日常使用中的表现毋庸置疑，但联发科芯片组的性能也不能太强。高废热会导致大量节流，至少在 X200 Pro 上是这样，这意味着在负载阶段性能必须减半。因此，游戏玩家应该选择华硕 ROG Phone 9 Pro 等其他产品。
在可持续发展和透明度方面，vivo X200 Pro 也有失分。此外，先进的三年软件支持还可以扩展。不过，就目前该制造商在欧洲市场所追求的价格水平而言，旗舰手机的买家当然可以期待Galaxy S24+ 或 Pixel 9 Pro 的更新周期。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
在中国，vivo X200 Pro 基础版（12 GB 内存、256 GB）的起价约为 5300 元人民币（约合 685 欧元），而配备 16 GB 内存和 1 TB 存储空间的顶配版价格约为 840 欧元。这家中国制造商的旗舰产品可从我们的租赁合作伙伴深圳贸易公司以进口方式购买，价格约为 850 至 980 欧元。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 86.7%  | Vivo X200 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘ 15 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $6.99 MAOUICI Glass for Vivo X200 ... 2. $15.99 AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr... 3. $9.82 AQGGIIXY for Vivo X200 Pro V... List Price: 850€ | 223 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" 2800x1260 453 PPI OLED |
2. 87.6%  | OnePlus 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $15.99 Ringke Dual Easy Film [4-Lay... 2. $549.99 OnePlus Pad 2-12GB RAM + 256... 3. $8.99 (3+1 Pack) for Oneplus 13 5G... List Price: 720€ | 213 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.82" 3168x1440 510 PPI AMOLED |
3. 87.3%  | Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $15.99 AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr... 2. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Back Protector ... 3. AKABEILA [1 Pack Privacy Scr... List Price: 1199€ | 215 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" 2780x1264 450 PPI AMOLED |
4. 89.8% v7 (old)  | Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: $895.00 List Price: 1149€ | 196 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 3120x1440 513 PPI AMOLED |
5. 88.5% v7 (old)  | Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300 ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $16.62 AQGGIIXY 4 Pack Tempered Gla... 2. $10.99 MOOISVS 2+2Pack For Vivo X10... 3. $319.00 Zhiyun MOLUS X100 PRO V2 Upg... List Price: 1199€ | 221 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" 2800x1260 453 PPI AMOLED |
Table of Contents
- 判决
- vivo X200 Pro 的规格
- 手机壳--具有 IP 保护等级的 Vivo 手机
- 功能 - 配备快速 USB 的 vivo X200 Pro
- 软件 - vivo 手机Android 15
- 通信和全球导航卫星系统 - vivo X200 Pro 采用双 GPS
- 通话和语音质量 - 配备双卡双待的 vivo 手机
- 摄像头 - 配备索尼传感器的 vivo 手机
- 配件和保修 - vivo X200 Pro（带电源适配器
- 输入设备和操作 - vivo 手机使用面部解锁
- 显示屏 - 配备 OLED 显示屏的 vivo X200 Pro
- 性能 - vivo 手机采用联发科 SoC
- 排放 - 配备立体声音效的 vivo X200 Pro
- 电池寿命 - vivo 手机无线充电
- Notebookcheck 总体评分
vivo X200 Pro 的规格
手机壳--具有 IP 保护等级的 Vivo 手机
vivo X200 Pro 有四种颜色（深蓝色、黑色、白色和钛色）可供选择。得益于 6.78 英寸 OLED 面板四周纤薄的边缘，这款旗舰手机看起来非常吸引人，超过 90% 的显示屏表面比率也非常高效。在制造质量方面也没有什么可批评的。
通过 IP69 认证的防水外壳给人一种高品质的感觉，但金属边框和玻璃后壳都采用了高光处理，很快就会沾上指纹。此外，由于摄像头模块较大，X200 Pro 的头重脚轻。由于 vivo X200 Pro 通过了高 IP 认证，理论上也可以用高压水枪清洁。
vivo X200 Pro 的色彩选择（图片来源：vivo 中国）
功能 - 配备快速 USB 的 vivo X200 Pro
这款 vivo 旗舰产品配备了双扬声器系统、红外爆破器、蓝牙 5.4 和用于非接触式支付的 NFC 芯片。X200 Pro 继续使用快速 USB 3.2 端口，在我们使用 M2.SSD 磁盘（三星 980 Pro）进行的拷贝测试中，不仅速度快（253 MB/s），而且还支持有线图像输出。连接的数据载体不仅可以用 FAT32 格式化，还可以用 exFAT 和 NTFS 格式化。
软件 - vivo 手机Android 15
我们在中国展示的 X200 Pro 使用的是内部开发的 OriginOS 第 5 版，该版本基于Android 15，支持包括德语在内的多种语言。vivo 没有透露其旗舰产品在中国的更新支持时间。到目前为止，它在三个主要Android 版本和三年安全补丁的范围内，这与 Pixel 9 Pro或 Galaxy S24 Ultra.在我们测试时，补丁是从 2024 年 11 月开始的。
面向欧洲的全球版本可能会搭载 Funtouch OS。后者看起来并不那么现代，但与中国版不同的是，它没有预装中国的应用程序和服务，谷歌应用程序可以在出厂前使用。Funtouch OS 在人工智能功能方面肯定也会有所不同。不过，谷歌应用也可以通过内部的 V-Appstore 与 OriginOS 一起使用，随后安装的 Play Store 也可以顺利使用。
可持续性
可持续发展并不是 X200 Pro 的重点，vivo 在这方面仍有一些工作要做。关于材料选择或 "回收 "主题的信息传达并不透明。此外，也几乎无法确认该设备是否可以维修。包装可能不含塑料，是用大豆油油墨印刷的。但是，智能手机本身在运输过程中使用了塑料材料（铝箔、外壳）。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - vivo X200 Pro 采用双 GPS
考虑进口 X200 Pro 的用户不必担心 LTE 频段 20 和 28 的问题，因为根据规格，这两个频率都支持。此外，X200 Pro 还为中国市场提供了带卫星通信功能的版本，但在中国以外的地区不太可能使用。
X200 Pro 支持现代 WiFi 7，但不能使用 6 GHz 频道。至少在我们测试的中国市场版本中，这款 vivo 旗舰手机只能使用 2.4 和 5 GHz 频段建立连接。不过，使用我们的参考路由器--华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 可以实现高速上网。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Average Wi-Fi 7 (556 - 1801, n=48) | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=193, last 2 years) | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average Wi-Fi 7 (565 - 1875, n=48) | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| Average Wi-Fi 7 (563 - 1945, n=37) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1945, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| Average Wi-Fi 7 (892 - 1864, n=37) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (668 - 1864, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
在一次骑车旅行中，我们将其定位质量与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。X200 Pro 可以使用双频全球卫星网络确定位置。在详细的路线中可以看到轻微的误差，直线弯道往往被缩短。尽管 Vivo 手机可以毫不犹豫地执行导航任务，但总体而言 Venu 2 更为精确。
通话和语音质量 - 配备双卡双待的 vivo 手机
语音质量非常好，语音重现清晰，环境噪声被明显过滤掉。AI 语音助手以及 Wi-Fi 通话和 VoLTE 功能可根据要求使用。除了两张具有双卡双待功能的实体 nanoSIM 卡外，eSIM 卡只能在中国以外的全球机型上使用。
摄像头 - 配备索尼传感器的 vivo 手机
X200 Pro 的相机系统是一个真正的亮点。索尼新推出的 1/1.28 英寸传感器（LYT-818）比 X100 Pro 的 IMX989 小得多。X100 Pro但结合更大的 f/1.57 光圈，它仍能提供极高的照片质量。
这枚 5000 万像素镜头配备 OIS 和蔡司 T* 镀膜，旨在提高透光率，具有非常出色的 HDR 计算能力，这意味着动态范围和曝光通常都非常出色。如果希望在标准模式下更中性地显示过饱和的色彩，可以使用 ZEISS 模式。不过，我们仍然看到了改进的潜力，尤其是在弱光环境下。在这方面，拥有巨大图像传感器的前代产品显示出了更好的照明效果。
除了主摄像头，X200 Pro与竞争对手相比 也毫不逊色 。新的 200 万像素长焦镜头具有 3.7 倍的无损放大率，可在 10 倍变焦水平下拍摄出迷人的照片。即使在拍摄全分辨率照片时，vivo 手机也能以令人惊叹的出色效果给人留下深刻印象，即使在光线条件不太理想的情况下也是如此，明显优于三星的 Galaxy S24 Ultra.我们的测试照片也显示出 50 万像素超广角镜头的大量细节和良好的锐度。不过，X200 Pro 也暴露了一个弱点，那就是镜头眩光，这是由于 相机镜头的特殊涂层造成 的 。.不过，通过软件更新，今后应该可以将这一问题降至最低。
X200 Pro 在视频录制方面也有很多亮点。所有焦段的人像和 10 位 LOG 录像、4K60 的杜比视界支持以及主摄像头和长焦摄像头的全新 4K120 慢动作模式都已配备。
色彩模式对比：标准（左）与蔡司（右）对比
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow LightUltra wide-angleZoom 5x
配件和保修 - vivo X200 Pro（带电源适配器
X200 Pro 的供货范围包括一条 USB 电缆、一个设备颜色的保护盖和一个 90 瓦模块化电源装置。此外，Trading Shenzhen 还包括一个欧盟插座适配器。不过，这不属于标准交货范围，而是租赁公司提供的一项服务。
保证 保修期 为 12 个月。就我们从 Trading Shenzhen 购买的测试设备而言，如果需要保修，也可以将 vivo 手机寄往德国的送货地址。不过，vivo 欧洲公司过去曾向我们确认，如果设备在欧洲正式销售，在国外购买的机型也可以在德国进行保修索赔。
输入设备和操作 - vivo 手机使用面部解锁
6.78 英寸 120 Hz OLED 显示屏上的输入准确无误，图像变化显示非常流畅。线性振动电机（X 轴）也非常精确，触感极佳。
全新的 3D 超声波指纹传感器也非常出色，它位于高处，解锁速度很快，非常方便。在测试期间，我们的手指在第二次尝试时才被识别的情况几乎没有发生过。此外，还提供了通过前置摄像头进行 2D 面部识别的生物认证功能。
显示屏 - 配备 OLED 显示屏的 vivo X200 Pro
6.78 英寸 1,260p AMOLED 面板四面弯曲，不仅采用了先进的 LTPO 技术，可变范围为 1 至 120 Hz（我们在测试中也可以确认这一点），而且还采用了 2380 Hz 的 PWM 调光，非常人性化。
在播放 HDR 内容时，我们达到了 4,812 cd/m² 的超高峰值亮度，但在实际的 APL18 测试中，2,521 cd/m² 的超高亮度也给人留下了深刻印象。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 1828 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
| Vivo X200 Pro OLED, 2800x1260, 6.8" | OnePlus 13 AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8" | Oppo Find X8 Pro AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy S24+ AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7" | Vivo X100 Pro AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -29% | -21% | -114% | -2% | |
| Brightness middle | 1828 | 1155 -37% | 1167 -36% | 1358 -26% | 1392 -24% |
| Brightness | 1828 | 1155 -37% | 1160 -37% | 1358 -26% | 1360 -26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 98 4% | 98 4% | 92 -2% | 84 -11% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.7 | 1 -43% | 0.87 -24% | 3 -329% | 0.6 14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.6 | 1.8 -13% | 1.64 -3% | 4.4 -175% | 1.3 19% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1.6 -45% | 1.4 -27% | 2.5 -127% | 0.9 18% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.3 96% | 2.311 95% | 1.98 111% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6520 100% | 6503 100% | 6426 101% | 6656 98% | 6540 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 360 Hz Amplitude: 17.65 % Secondary Frequency: 2380 Hz |   | |
The display backlight flickers at 360 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 360 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
我们使用 Calman 分析软件检查 OLED 面板的色彩校准。在 "专业 "配置文件和 "标准 "白平衡中，使用的是 sRGB 色彩空间，再现非常准确。我们使用光度计测量的结果是，平均 DeltaE 偏差非常低，分别为 0.9（色彩）和 1.1（灰度）。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7645 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.664 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.78 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.8975 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.882 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
在户外使用时，X200 Pro 有足够的亮度储备，即使在晴天也能轻松阅读。在我们的测试中，即使是 OLED 显示屏玻璃表面的反光也没有导致任何可读性问题。可视角度的稳定性也令人满意。
性能 - vivo 手机采用联发科 SoC
联发科 联发科 Dimensity 9400是一款高端 SoC，主频高达 3.62 GHz。虽然在 CPU 基准测试中，它的性能还不足以在我们的对比中名列前茅，但这款 vivo 手机仍然可以被认为是非常强大的。不过，在人工智能测试中，Dimensity 9400 有时会取得明显高于 OnePlus 13 的数值。 一加 13的 骁龙 8 精英版.
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (75143 - 81594, n=2) | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (1368 - 1543, n=2) | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (122 - 4619, n=42, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (9283 - 9476, n=2) | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (122 - 32432, n=42, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (12709 - 13068, n=2) | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (118 - 44657, n=42, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| AI Benchmark - Score V6 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (213 - 9873, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
撠 Immortalis-G925是 Dimensity 9400在 X200 Pro 中，它有 12 个内核。与 Adreno 830相比，ARM GPU 在 GFXBench 中的得分略高，而在 3DMark 中，OnePlus 13 和 X200 Pro 的得分则略低于 Adreno 830。 OnePlus 13的表现略胜一筹。前者还表明，即使是要求非常苛刻的 4K 分辨率游戏，在 vivo 手机上也能以超过 50 帧/秒的速度运行--至少在某些时候是这样。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131) | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (216 - 234, n=2) | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
| Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (269 - 271, n=2) | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121) | |
| Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
| Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
| OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131) | |
| Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (16.3 - 17.7, n=2) | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
| OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131) | |
| Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (147 - 225, n=2) | |
| Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121) | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131) | |
| Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (60987 - 86943, n=2) | |
| Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121) | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121) | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (432 - 625, n=2) | |
| OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131) | |
| Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Vivo X200 Pro | OnePlus 13 | Oppo Find X8 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S24+ | Vivo X100 Pro | Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 16% | 6% | -23% | 39% | 17% | -32% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 2694.85 | 3984.23 48% | 3482.9 29% | 2450.9 -9% | 3986.41 48% | 3625 ? 35% | 1894 ? -30% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 2174.26 | 3684.36 69% | 3498.5 61% | 1523.87 -30% | 3461.77 59% | 3001 ? 38% | 1476 ? -32% |
| Random Read 4KB | 317.29 | 301.29 -5% | 375.7 18% | 387.42 22% | 450.24 42% | 386 ? 22% | 278 ? -12% |
| Random Write 4KB | 658.43 | 344.63 -48% | 100.4 -85% | 176.19 -73% | 709.25 8% | 467 ? -29% | 312 ? -53% |
Games
排放 - 配备立体声音效的 vivo X200 Pro
温度
X200 Pro 的明显发热确保了在我们的《燃烧》基准测试中达到近 47 度的高表面温度。在 3DMark 的 "野外生存压力 "测试中，这导致系统性能节流高达 60%。在日常使用中，例如夏天玩游戏时，这很可能也会导致性能下降。在某些情况下，性能水平甚至低于 前代产品.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
| Vivo X100 Pro | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Oppo Find X8 Pro | |
| Vivo X200 Pro | |
| OnePlus 13 | |
发言人
vivo X200 Pro 依赖于吸引人的双扬声器系统，低音极低。我们的粉红噪声测量显示，中音的频率曲线呈上升趋势，而高音则略有下降。如果您想与外部设备一起使用声音输出，可以使用有线 USB 端口或无线蓝牙 5.4。
Vivo X200 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - vivo 手机无线充电
耗电量
vivo 手机的 6,000 mAh 电池（22.53 Wh，3.84 V）支持 90 瓦有线充电和最大 30 瓦无线充电。使用随附的快充电源，充电过程大约需要 45 分钟。
与 Find X8 Pro相比，vivo X200 Pro 在闲置模式下的功耗略高。
| Off / Standby |   0.12 / 0.21 Watt |
| Idle |  0.43 / 1.76 / 1.83 Watt |
| Load |
9.58 / 11.43 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Vivo X200 Pro 6000 mAh | OnePlus 13 6000 mAh | Oppo Find X8 Pro 5910 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S24+ 4900 mAh | Vivo X100 Pro 2700 mAh | Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -23% | 20% | 17% | 13% | 10% | -7% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.43 | 0.86 -100% | 0.6 -40% | 0.43 -0% | 0.46 -7% | 0.515 ? -20% | 0.883 ? -105% |
| Idle Average * | 1.76 | 1.74 1% | 0.8 55% | 0.84 52% | 0.92 48% | 1.28 ? 27% | 1.467 ? 17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.83 | 1.85 -1% | 0.9 51% | 0.95 48% | 0.95 48% | 1.365 ? 25% | 1.621 ? 11% |
| Load Average * | 9.58 | 10.69 -12% | 6.8 29% | 6.76 29% | 11.72 -22% | 8.19 ? 15% | 6.58 ? 31% |
| Load Maximum * | 11.43 | 11.92 -4% | 10.9 5% | 16.42 -44% | 11.79 -3% | 11.2 ? 2% | 9.91 ? 13% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
在我们进行的实际电池测试中，显示屏亮度调整为 150 cd/m²，在 WLAN 测试中，该设备提供了近 23.5 小时的出色运行时间。
| Vivo X200 Pro 6000 mAh | OnePlus 13 6000 mAh | Oppo Find X8 Pro 5910 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S24+ 4900 mAh | Vivo X100 Pro 2700 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 1404 | 1349 -4% | 1411 0% | 1009 -28% | 1127 -20% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
由于有多种语言可供选择，而且价格相对较低，进口 vivo X200 Pro 非常合理。
Vivo X200 Pro
- 12/20/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
