惠普预兆 17（2024）评测：RTX 4070 和 Ryzen 7 在游戏笔记本电脑中大显身手

Name: HP Omen 17-db0079ng
Brand: HP

强大的构造

Omen 17 令人印象深刻地展示了 17 英寸游戏笔记本电脑的性能，提供了稳定且高水平的中端性能，同时，由于成功实现了控制，散热工作的噪音水平出奇地适中。只有一些综合性能稍显落后。

Mario Petzold, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/26/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Zen 4 Windows Laptop / Notebook Gaming Geforce

惠普预兆 17（2024）配备了 RTX 4070 和 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS，可满足当前所有高水平游戏的需求，处于中端机型的起跑线上。此外，还配备了分辨率合适的 QHD 显示屏，刷新率也达到了 240 赫兹。有了这些，一台优秀的游戏笔记本电脑的所有基本要素都得到了满足。

有了这么大的空间，尤其是内部空间，我们还可以期待一些稳定的性能值，与小型笔记本电脑相比应该会更好。我们在大量基准测试和游戏测试中对此进行了评估。

我们的测试机尽管装备水平较高，但价格仍低于 2,000 欧元（约合 2,172 美元），这在目前已不是必然的。要做到这一点，你还必须接受一些妥协，其中有些妥协是不必要的。我们的测试将显示，它是否仍足以领先于竞争对手，如宏碁掠夺者 Helios Neo 16或华硕 TUF Gaming A17或采用上一代 AMD Ryzen 9 处理器的华硕 TUF Gaming A17。

Test device courtesy of Playox DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Omen 17-db0079ng (Omen 17 Series)

Processor

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 100 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1980 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 120 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, Nvidia Game Ready 556.12, Advanced Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-5600, dual-channel

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, BOE0B67, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, 1024 GB

Soundcard

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: headset

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek RTL8852BE (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 30.1 x 398 x 278

Battery

83 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix HP True Vision 1080p

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Omen Gaming Hub, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.833 kg, Power Supply: 832 g

Price

1900 Euro

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
80.4 %	v8	07 / 2024	HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	30.1 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
80.3 %	v8	07 / 2024	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	22.4 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
90.2 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	03 / 2024	Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	23.5 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87.6 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	04 / 2024	Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.7 kg	30.4 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
86.8 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	05 / 2024	Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	25.95 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
85.6 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	25.4 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

请注意，我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果已不能与第 7 版相比。您可以在这里.

案例 - 大型重型游戏机

外壳看起来几乎毫无特色。黑色塑料占据了整个外壳，给人的感觉也是如此。没有任何视觉亮点、小细节，甚至连灯光效果都不值得欣赏。

但是，一旦你试着抬起笔记本电脑，或者在我们的情况下直接将其从包装盒中取出，就会发现惠普绝对没有节省使用内部的大量组件。虽然只抬起前端的一个角，底座也不会受到影响，但重量离 3 千克大关（约 6.6 磅）并不遥远。一切都保持坚硬和紧密。

显示屏铰链也给人类似的印象，但显示屏盖子的稳定性还可以再好一些，因为没有任何额外的金属框架，仍然相当容易弯曲。

就整体尺寸而言，只有少数机型的尺寸更大。即使没有脚垫，40 厘米（约 15.7 英寸）的宽度和 3 厘米（约 1.2 英寸）的高度听起来也不太方便移动。另一方面，这也为硬件和散热提供了充足的空间，不过对于某些笔记本电脑包或背包来说可能会显得过大。

尺寸比较

HP Omen 17-db0079ng Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 Alienware m16 R2 Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV DIN A4 ❌

连接设备 - 奥门 17，亮点不多

尽管空间很大，但连接端口有限。不仅如此，它们还是速度较慢的版本。背面的所有 USB 接口只能达到 10 Gbit/s，侧面的甚至只有 5 Gbit/s。如果是 USB4 或 TB4，速度会是现在的四倍或八倍。但至少背面的接口还能让你通过外置固态硬盘玩很多游戏。

同样，LAN 端口的速度也只有 1 Gbit/s，而配置更好的竞争对手，如宏碁掠夺者 Helios Neo则更加与时俱进，达到了 2.5 Gbit/s。端口在左侧的位置也不够理想，最好是在背面。此外，既没有第三个视频端口，也没有读卡器。

至少，HDMI 和 USB-C 视频输出支持显示 4K@120Hz，让那些拥有合适电视的用户能够很好地利用它。

背面连接：电源、2 个 USB-A（10 Gbit/s）、USB-C（10 Gbit/s、DP、PD）

交流

无线局域网模块在其能力范围内运行良好。在理想的条件下，它的速度接近 1 Gbit/s，几乎与有线连接一样好。在我们的测试中，没有出现任何值得一提的掉线现象。

虽然 Wi-Fi 6 模块能确保稳定可靠的连接，但它并不适合传输大量数据。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=148, last 2 years)	1235 MBit/s +45%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202	1205 (875^min - 1438^max) MBit/s +42%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	980 (886^min - 1077^max) MBit/s +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	959 (491^min - 1062^max) MBit/s +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 Realtek RTL8852BE	875 (812^min - 916^max) MBit/s +3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng Realtek RTL8852BE	850 (782^min - 874^max) MBit/s
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV Realtek RTL8852BE	806 (513^min - 843^max) MBit/s -5%
Average Realtek RTL8852BE (536 - 925, n=42)	792 MBit/s -7%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=148, last 2 years)	1392 MBit/s +50%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202	1227 (1074^min - 1317^max) MBit/s +32%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	957 (475^min - 998^max) MBit/s +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV Realtek RTL8852BE	956 (936^min - 974^max) MBit/s +3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng Realtek RTL8852BE	930 (466^min - 946^max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	927 (762^min - 964^max) MBit/s 0%
Average Realtek RTL8852BE (455 - 984, n=43)	847 MBit/s -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 Realtek RTL8852BE	843 (621^min - 906^max) MBit/s -9%

HP Omen 17-db0079ng Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø850 (782-874)

Alienware m16 R2 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1205 (875-1438)

Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø875 (812-916)

HP Omen 17-db0079ng Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø914 (466-946)

Alienware m16 R2 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1227 (1074-1317)

Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø843 (621-906)

网络摄像头

不错的全高清分辨率带来了细腻的图像。但这只适用于室内光线足够明亮的情况。即使天花板上的灯光不是很亮，也会导致图像质量下降。相机很难应对微弱的光线条件。细节会丢失，色彩还原也会大打折扣。只有在周围光线明亮的情况下，安装在显示框中的摄像头的色彩准确度才会令人信服。因此，我们不建议使用该摄像头进行几次以上的视频通话。

这是令人遗憾的，因为麦克风确实有一些潜力。虽然它的录音听起来有点刺耳，但始终以相同的音量录制，而且听起来非常清晰。你甚至可以很容易地听到房间外面的声音。

ColorChecker HP Omen 17-db0079ng: 8.69 ∆E min: 5.44 - max: 14.79 ∆E

维护

惠普 Omen 17 的机箱底部易于打开，这一点值得肯定。卸下 8 颗普通的飞利浦螺钉后，机箱盖不会产生任何阻力，无需用力即可轻松卸下。

这样就可以清洁风扇和更换所有重要部件。两个内存插槽、一个 WLAN 模块（带有方便使用的天线插头）、两个固态硬盘插槽和一个可轻松拆卸的电池，这些都是许多更小巧的笔记本电脑所无法提供的，至少不是这种完整的组合。

此外，M.2 固态硬盘插槽还配有铜盖，这显然也会产生影响，我们稍后在测试中就会发现。其中一个插槽仍然可用，因此以后增加存储空间很容易实现。

可持续性

包装主要由纸板和纸张组成。就连笔记本电脑和键盘的保护盖也是纸做的。只有充电器用塑料保护膜包裹。此外，笔记本电脑的维护也很方便，这肯定会延长 Omen 17 的使用寿命。从工作存储器到电池，所有部件都可以更换。

此外，Omen 17 的功耗适中，日常工作功耗大多低于 10 瓦。典型的台式电脑在这方面明显处于劣势。

最后，惠普每年都会发布一份可持续发展报告，介绍制造商采取的各种措施，从利用可再生能源发电开始，一直到实现公司结构各层次所有员工待遇平等的目标。您可以在这里了解详情。

保修

惠普提供两年保修，但不提供现场维修等额外服务。根据供应商的不同，您也可以在那里预订一些额外的保修选项。

输入设备 - HP Omen 17 仅提供标准功能

键盘看起来不太适合游戏笔记本电脑。键程较短，按键阻力几乎不明显。此外，键盘缺少可单独调节的照明功能。即使你可以选择几乎任何颜色并对亮度进行微调，但所有按键的照明颜色都是一样的。至少，方向键应该是全尺寸的。

触摸板的情况也类似。尽管触摸板的尺寸为 13 x 8 厘米（5.1 x 3.15 英寸），大小适中，反应也非常准确，但按键的调整似乎不太理想。按压力度较大时会产生一些明显的咔嗒声。虽然键盘的整体性能足以满足日常工作的需要--它还提供了紧凑的边框和良好的键入体验--但那些想玩更激烈游戏的人几乎不得不使用其他输入设备。

显示屏 - 根据所提供的游戏性能进行了很好的调整

如果你想一想一台好的笔记本电脑的游戏显示屏必须具备哪些功能，你就会对惠普 Omen 17 的 QHD 显示屏有相当准确的认识。结合 17 英寸的对角线，该分辨率可确保图像清晰细腻。

除游戏外，16:9 格式也非常适合流媒体播放。IPS 面板上的色彩看起来相当自然，磨砂表面还能防止恼人的反光。

240 赫兹的刷新率和足够大的色彩空间确保了各种游戏类型的显示效果。在我们的测量中，响应时间也能与更好的机型保持一致，达到了比华硕 TUF GAMING 17的响应时间。

对比度和黑色值的表现不尽如人意。即使是 IPS 面板，我们也不指望它能呈现出完美的黑色，但它的图像看起来太亮了，绝对暗淡无光。另一方面，我们用肉眼根本无法发现任何屏幕出血现象，或者在长时间曝光时也只能发现很少的出血现象。在测试中，我们也没有看到脉宽调制产生的闪烁。

此外，惠普还提供 144 赫兹的全高清版本，与 RTX 4060 结合使用可能是一个明智的选择。


354 cd/m²	330 cd/m²	323 cd/m²
353 cd/m²	363 cd/m²	310 cd/m²
368 cd/m²	352 cd/m²	317 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE0B67 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 368 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 341.1 cd/m² Minimum: 25 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 363 cd/m²
Contrast: 955:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.43
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
68.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.235

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Omen 17-db0079ng BOE0B67, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"	Alienware m16 R2 BOE NE16NYH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR BOE NE160QDM-NM7, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 16"	Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Chi Mei N160GME-GTB, LED, 2560x1600, 16"	Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AU Optronics B173HAN04.9, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AU Optronics B156HAN15.H, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		6%	30%	26%	-39%	5%
Display P3 Coverage	66.2	71 7%	99.8 51%	95.9 45%	39.7 -40%	70.5 6%
sRGB Coverage	95.5	100 5%	100 5%	99.8 5%	59.1 -38%	98.5 3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	68.1	71.4 5%	90.8 33%	86.4 27%	41 -40%	72.7 7%
Response Times		28%	20%	30%	-198%	-148%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6)	5.7 ?(2.6, 3.1) 60%	5 ?(2, 3) 65%	5 ?(2.5, 2.5) 65%	39 ?(18, 21) -171%	31.7 ?(14.7, 17) -120%
Response Time Black / White *	8.3 ?(3.5, 4.8)	8.7 ?(4.6, 4.1) -5%	10.4 ?(3, 7.4) -25%	8.8 ?(4.7, 4.1) -6%	26.9 ?(13.8, 13.1) -224%	22.9 ?(11.7, 11.2) -176%
PWM Frequency			2040 ?(10)
Screen		6%	29%	7%	-66%	-22%
Brightness middle	363	345.8 -5%	490 35%	521 44%	255.9 -30%	315 -13%
Brightness	341	337 -1%	487 43%	506 48%	248 -27%	303 -11%
Brightness Distribution	84	87 4%	94 12%	85 1%	91 8%	90 7%
Black Level *	0.38	0.3 21%	0.4 -5%	0.44 -16%	0.21 45%	0.25 34%
Contrast	955	1153 21%	1225 28%	1184 24%	1219 28%	1260 32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.74	1.99 -14%	1.08 38%	1.74 -0%	4.51 -159%	2.26 -30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.39	3.52 35%	2.38 56%	3.88 28%	20.77 -285%	7.37 -37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.43	0.62 57%	0.9 37%	0.52 64%	1.82 -27%	1.03 28%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.3	2.1 -62%	1.1 15%	3 -131%	3.2 -146%	4 -208%
Gamma	2.235 ^98%	2.32 ^95%	2.13 ^103%	2.164 ^102%	2.08 ^106%	2.116 ^104%
CCT	6346 ^102%	6369 ^102%	6724 ^97%	6816 ^95%	6054 ^107%	7570 ^86%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		13% / 9%	26% / 28%	21% / 14%	-101% / -79%	-55% / -34%

* ... smaller is better

即使不进行额外的校准，色彩还原也是可以的。我们只测量到蓝色的偏差较大，肉眼也能察觉到。在其他色彩区域，包括灰阶，色彩还原在交付状态下几乎是完美的。

校准后，不再有异常值，色彩准确度始终保持在较高水平。

推荐用于游戏的 sRGB 色彩空间并未完全覆盖。但这在实际使用中几乎不会被察觉，而且更简单的显示器显示的色彩也要少三分之一。不过，一些竞争对手，如 Alienware m16 R2采用了相同的面板技术，可以达到 100%。如果你想在一旁进行图像和视频处理，这样的显示器会是更好的选择。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.5 ms rise
8.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.8 ms rise
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在室外，如果您还想看到屏幕上的任何内容，就一定要坐在阴凉处。Omen 17 的亮度有限，这意味着即使天空稍有阴霾，你也无法看清显示屏上的任何内容。

但即便如此，图像也显得苍白无力。色彩在室外没有活力，被一层灰色的面纱所覆盖。如果你想在色彩绚丽的环境中享受游戏乐趣，就必须在室内进行游戏。

与我们通常在 IPS 面板上看到的情况不同，具有 QHD 分辨率的 HP Omen 从大约 45 度的视角开始就会出现一些明显的色彩变化。在此之前，图像仍然很容易辨认，我们也没有注意到在此之前亮度有任何下降。超过 45 度后，所有颜色都显示出轻微的黄色色调。

性能 - Omen 17 是一款性能均衡的游戏笔记本电脑

在性能方面，我们的测试机配备了 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070的测试设备在我们的对比设备中处于中等水平。不过，CPU 和 GPU 的性能都略低于其最大潜力。

Ryzen 7 的持续运行功耗为 65 瓦，而不是申克 XMG Core 15 的 70 瓦甚至 80 瓦。申克 XMG Core 15为例。GPU 也略有节流，只能使用 120 瓦，而不是最大可能的 140 瓦。同类游戏笔记本电脑如华硕 TUF GAMING A17 FA707等同类游戏笔记本电脑的显卡性能要稍高一些，但这并不是唯一的优势，也不一定会带来明显的帧率提升。

32GB 的 DDR5-5600 内存设备也非常稳固。由于内存可以轻松更换，以后还可以进行扩展。在这个级别上，我们不会因为内存只有 5,600 MHz 而受到限制。

搭载 RTX 4060 的惠普 Omen 17 还有更小的版本。

测试条件

通过三种电源配置文件，您可以调整 Omen 17 以适应大多数典型场景。您可以从下表中了解对功耗、风扇行为和游戏性能的具体影响。

我们使用 "性能 "配置文件进行基准测试。此外，您还可以进行许多对风扇行为有重大影响的调整。例如，可以将风扇级别调整为更大功率，或者即使在最高性能级别也可以大幅降低风扇级别，这将对最高性能产生影响。

电源配置文件	CPU 负载	GPU 负载（包括 15 瓦提升）	Steel Nomad	赛博朋克 2077 QHD Ultra	最大风扇噪音
Eco	65->35 瓦	40 瓦	24.37 FPS	60 FPS (Lock)	41 dB(A)
平衡型	65->35 瓦	90 瓦	25.23 FPS	75 FPS	43 dB(A)
性能	100->65 瓦	120 瓦	27.43 FPS	80 FPS	48 dB(A)

处理器

......（英文 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS是鹰点系列中的一款快速处理器，采用 Zen 4 架构，性能几乎达到了 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS的性能。它的性能也与英特尔酷睿 i7-13700H.

不过，Ryzen 7 的 8 个相同内核屡屡能在 i7-13700H 的 6 个性能内核面前取得微弱优势，尤其是在游戏时。

虽然我们几乎总能观察到竞争对手的持续性能略有下降，但这款 CPU 却能持续保持较好的性能水平。

您可以在我们的 CPU 基准测试列表.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2557 (2454.44-2575)

Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2777 (2743.86-2839.9)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4439 (4357.3-4809.43)

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX: Ø3274 (3212.59-3455.14)

Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2784 (2741.98-2817.3)

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H: Ø2688 (2638-2777.2)

Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2730 (2699.97-2763)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX	88 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX	76.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	68 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	63.3 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	63.1 pt
Alienware m16 R2 ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	62.1 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	59.5 pt
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H	57.9 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	54.8 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX	30411 Points +84%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX	23207 Points +41%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)	21812 Points +32%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18419 (18019.3^min - 18419.5^max) Points +12%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H	18282 Points +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	17623 (17398.8^min - 17622.8^max) Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	17423 Points +6%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	16494 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14895 - 18037, n=11)	16146 Points -2%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX	2193 Points +35%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX	2103 Points +30%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H	1904 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=187, last 2 years)	1887 Points +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1832 Points +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	1814 Points +12%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1749 Points +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1623 - 1783, n=11)	1747 Points +8%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1623 Points

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX	11604 Points +80%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX	8361 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)	8300 Points +29%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7050 Points +9%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H	6967 Points +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6894 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	6859 Points +7%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6440 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5808 - 7026, n=11)	6309 Points -2%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX	839 Points +23%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX	803 Points +18%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H	731 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)	725 Points +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	714 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (673 - 698, n=11)	685 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	681 Points
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	674 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	670 Points -2%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX	4809 (4357.3^min - 4809.43^max) Points +87%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX	3455 Points +34%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)	3417 Points +33%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2840 (2743.86^min - 2839.9^max) Points +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2817 (2741.98^min - 2817.3^max) Points +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	2777 Points +8%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H	2763 (2699.97^min - 2763^max) Points +7%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2575 (2454.44^min - 2575^max) Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2342 - 2908, n=11)	2556 Points -1%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX	316 Points +17%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX	294 Points +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	287 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	284 Points +6%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H	278 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)	278 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (269 - 283, n=11)	276 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	269 Points
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	256 Points -5%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (179 - 216, n=11)	202 Seconds * -1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	200 Seconds *
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	183 Seconds * +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	182 Seconds * +9%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H	174 Seconds * +13%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years)	170.8 Seconds * +15%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX	140 Seconds * +30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX	110 Seconds * +45%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX	121465 MIPS +88%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX	93134 MIPS +44%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years)	85207 MIPS +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	73222 MIPS +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	72749 MIPS +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (62669 - 74664, n=11)	67906 MIPS +5%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	67581 MIPS +4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	64759 MIPS
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H	52867 MIPS -18%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX	7442 MIPS +43%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX	6890 MIPS +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6642 MIPS +28%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	6615 MIPS +27%
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years)	6305 MIPS +21%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5197 - 6714, n=11)	6288 MIPS +21%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H	6090 MIPS +17%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	5197 MIPS
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5037 MIPS -3%

Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX	18590 Points +46%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX	17292 Points +36%
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 19665, n=110, last 2 years)	14195 Points +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11073 - 14014, n=15)	12791 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12697 Points
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12670 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	12662 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12447 Points -2%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H	8415 Points -34%

Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX	3025 Points +19%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX	2975 Points +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2730 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	2711 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3129, n=110, last 2 years)	2650 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2510 - 2698, n=13)	2617 Points +3%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H	2564 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2550 Points
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2383 Points -7%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX	21335 Points +80%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX	18225 Points +54%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years)	14993 Points +26%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12328 Points +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	11949 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	11864 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11256 - 12726, n=12)	11855 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	11399 Points -4%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H	8888 Points -25%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX	2210 Points +25%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX	2131 Points +21%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2014 Points +14%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	1991 Points +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1765 - 2004, n=12)	1924 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years)	1892 Points +7%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H	1793 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1765 Points
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1741 Points -1%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX	32 fps +65%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX	24.6 fps +27%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years)	23.5 fps +21%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	21.9 fps +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	21.8 fps +12%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	21.2 fps +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (18.6 - 22.7, n=11)	20 fps +3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	19.4 fps
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H	18 fps -7%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	77 s *
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H	55 s * +29%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (44.4 - 77, n=11)	51 s * +34%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	49.8 s * +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	49.4 s * +36%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX	47.9 s * +38%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	47.5 s * +38%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=183, last 2 years)	47.3 s * +39%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX	42.5 s * +45%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	0.4935 sec *
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.487 sec * +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (0.4304 - 0.4935, n=11)	0.4528 sec * +8%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4442 sec * +10%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years)	0.438 sec * +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	0.4298 sec * +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	0.4278 sec * +13%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX	0.3821 sec * +23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3699 sec * +25%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2575 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

127.4 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

269 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6440 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

681 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1623 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

16494 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	97.3 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	82.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	82.1 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	79.3 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	78.8 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	76.5 pt
Average of class Gaming	75 pt
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	63.9 pt
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	57.8 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	28889 KRay/s +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	28698 KRay/s +7%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	26816 KRay/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	26280 KRay/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (23708 - 29544, n=11)	25839 KRay/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years)	21786 KRay/s -19%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	21558 KRay/s -20%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	18470 KRay/s -31%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	17448 KRay/s -35%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	125593 Points +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	123214 Points +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	122466 Points +8%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	113402 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (99659 - 125873, n=11)	109203 Points -4%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	107531 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years)	106398 Points -6%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	92996 Points -18%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	88382 Points -22%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	6666 MB/s +38%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	5119 MB/s +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	5113 MB/s +6%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	5056 MB/s +5%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years)	4884 MB/s +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4814 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (4332 - 5180, n=11)	4708 MB/s -2%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4242 MB/s -12%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	3920 MB/s -19%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	150835 Points +30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	144073 Points +24%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	125950 Points +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	121191 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years)	116767 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	116204 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (109458 - 124695, n=11)	116188 Points 0%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	106470 Points -8%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84180 Points -28%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	16108 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	15856 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15511 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15101 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14062 - 15519, n=11)	14859 Points -2%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13605 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years)	13223 Points -12%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	10888 Points -28%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	10617 Points -30%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66238 Points +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	65523 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	64437 Points +6%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	60582 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (53436 - 67367, n=11)	58328 Points -4%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	54174 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years)	53561 Points -12%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	47685 Points -21%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	43349 Points -28%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	226181 MB/s +158%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years)	109083 MB/s +24%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	98391 MB/s +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (64515 - 172642, n=11)	95038 MB/s +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	91719 MB/s +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	90481 MB/s +3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87760 MB/s
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	82757 MB/s -6%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	81519 MB/s -7%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1861 MB/s +72%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1494 MB/s +38%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years)	1359 MB/s +26%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1219 MB/s +13%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1167 MB/s +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1152 MB/s +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1150 MB/s +6%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1080 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (627 - 1080, n=11)	979 MB/s -9%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15675 KRay/s +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	15513 KRay/s +9%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	14253 KRay/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	14033 KRay/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (12361 - 15911, n=11)	13740 KRay/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years)	11734 KRay/s -18%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11438 KRay/s -20%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9802 KRay/s -31%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	9400 KRay/s -34%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	49769 MPixel/s +21%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	46636 MPixel/s +13%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	41300 MPixel/s
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years)	40082 MPixel/s -3%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	39532 MPixel/s -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (33192 - 41668, n=11)	38987 MPixel/s -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	33410 MPixel/s -19%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	33407 MPixel/s -19%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	12872 MPixel/s -69%

系统性能

在我们使用 PCMark 10 和其他一些类似基准进行评估的日常任务中，与同类系统基本没有明显差异。虽然表格中的最高值和最低值仅相差 10%，但其数值与配置更强的 Ryzen 7 8845HS 不相上下，在竞争对手中处于中等水平。

这款笔记本电脑的响应速度一直很高，在安装过程中或同时打开多个程序时都不会出现任何等待时间。即使在玩要求较高的游戏时，也可以继续切换到另一个应用程序，不过很少建议这样做。

PCMark 10 / Score
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	8302 Points +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	8092 Points +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7943 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7800 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ()	7800 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)	7791 Points 0%
Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7761 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	7703 Points -1%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	7463 Points -4%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	11708 Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	11617 Points +11%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	11188 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	10896 Points +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	10873 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)	10841 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	10499 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ()	10499 Points 0%
Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10330 Points -2%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	10273 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	10269 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	10202 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ()	10202 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)	9900 Points -3%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	9784 Points -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	9693 Points -5%
Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9422 Points -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	6662 Points -35%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	16027 Points +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	13618 Points +13%
Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	13035 Points +8%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	12909 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	12182 Points +1%
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)	12077 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	12023 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ()	12023 Points 0%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	10308 Points -14%

CrossMark / Overall
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	2235 Points +46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	2037 Points +33%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=147, last 2 years)	1905 Points +24%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1800 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1797 Points +17%
Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1762 Points +15%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1722 Points +12%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1531 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ()	1531 Points 0%

CrossMark / Productivity
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	2093 Points +41%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1874 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=147, last 2 years)	1805 Points +21%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1761 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1740 Points +17%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1694 Points +14%
Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1684 Points +13%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1488 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ()	1488 Points 0%

CrossMark / Creativity
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	2455 Points +46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	2327 Points +38%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=147, last 2 years)	2090 Points +24%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1979 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1918 Points +14%
Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1913 Points +14%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1841 Points +9%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1683 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ()	1683 Points 0%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	2053 Points +64%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1756 Points +40%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=147, last 2 years)	1704 Points +36%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1593 Points +27%
Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1576 Points +26%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1480 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1478 Points +18%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1255 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ()	1255 Points 0%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	323 Points +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	319 Points +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	310 Points +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	308 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=161, last 2 years)	304 Points +11%
Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	294 Points +7%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	294 Points +7%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	275 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ()	275 Points 0%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	308 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	307 Points
Tulpar T7 V20.6 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	273 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	271 Points
Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=148, last 2 years)	267 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	263 Points
Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	257 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	564 ms *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ()	564 ms * -0%
Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	546 ms * +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	505 ms * +10%
Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=175, last 2 years)	503 ms * +11%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	499 ms * +12%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	481 ms * +15%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	447 ms * +21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	443 ms * +21%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		7800 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	78885 MB/s +17%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	75827 MB/s +12%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67615 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (61459 - 71873, n=11)	67394 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years)	65188 MB/s -4%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	63008 MB/s -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	61823 MB/s -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	59740 MB/s -12%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	24334 MB/s -64%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	87507 MB/s +44%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	83034 MB/s +37%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	76370 MB/s +26%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years)	69056 MB/s +14%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	61696 MB/s +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	61456 MB/s +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	60660 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (49866 - 61976, n=11)	58208 MB/s -4%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	23681 MB/s -61%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86590 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (68425 - 93239, n=11)	85626 MB/s -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	78716 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77444 MB/s -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	72700 MB/s -16%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	70034 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years)	66928 MB/s -23%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66009 MB/s -24%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	22986 MB/s -73%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	126.2 ns * -25%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	101 ns *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (82.5 - 117, n=11)	96.9 ns * +4%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years)	94 ns * +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	92.6 ns * +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	91.8 ns * +9%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	91.1 ns * +10%
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	88.3 ns * +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	79.9 ns * +21%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

我们的测试设备目前的配置不一定适合实时音频和视频处理，因为你不得不期待一些小的卡顿。网络驱动程序和 DirectX 图形内核阻碍了更好的结果。如果更换驱动程序或进行软件更新，这种情况可能会有所改善，甚至更糟。

最突出的是，在播放 4K 视频时，iGPU 的利用率很高。虽然 60% 的使用率还可以接受，但这几乎是英特尔集成显卡解决方案的两倍。一分钟内出现 13 次丢帧也不是一个理想的结果。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	5821.3 μs * -197%
Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2037.7 μs * -4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1962 μs *
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1776.4 μs * +9%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	1451.9 μs * +26%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	790.8 μs * +60%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

这里使用的固态硬盘肯定达不到绝对的最高速度。例如华硕 ROG Strix Scar 16在顺序访问方面的性能要高出 30%。但这对游戏帧率的提升作用微乎其微。我们只能观察到，在执行大量并行访问任务的高强度多任务时，即使有提高，也是微乎其微。

另一方面，Omen 17 展示了固态硬盘良好的散热效果。与包括 ROG Strix Scar 在内的许多结构类似的竞争对手相比，Omen 17 的性能始终保持在不错的水平，即使不是很突出。

第二个 M.2-NVMe 固态硬盘插槽还预装了散热器。因此，如果你愿意，可以在这里添加更快或至少更大的硬盘。

AS SSD

DiskSpd

WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

Sequential Read: 3717MB/s

Sequential Write: 1997MB/s

4K Read: 51.5MB/s

4K Write: 176.5MB/s

4K-64 Read: 846MB/s

4K-64 Write: 1888MB/s

Access Time Read: 0.062ms

Access Time Write: 0.021ms

Score Read: 1270Points

Score Write: 2264Points

Score Total: 4108Points

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	92.2 pt
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	80.4 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	74.6 pt
Average of class Gaming	70.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	59.6 pt
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	50.8 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	47.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	45.8 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4480 (4426.62^min - 4479.73^max) MB/s +62%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	4104 (4091.75^min - 4103.68^max) MB/s +49%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)	3470 MB/s +26%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3426 (3325.1^min - 3425.77^max) MB/s +24%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (2406 - 4128, n=18)	3183 MB/s +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2943 (2931.61^min - 2942.92^max) MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	2775 (2749.58^min - 2774.95^max) MB/s +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2760 (2709.34^min - 2760.41^max) MB/s
seq write
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	4533 (4522.27^min - 4532.95^max) MB/s +56%
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4371 (4342.15^min - 4371.09^max) MB/s +50%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	4177 (3972.19^min - 4177.49^max) MB/s +44%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)	3807 MB/s +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3126 (3069.81^min - 3126.43^max) MB/s +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3019 (2871.34^min - 3019.1^max) MB/s +4%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (2235 - 3416, n=18)	2922 MB/s +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2905 (2803.32^min - 2905.46^max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7079 (6575.14^min - 7078.73^max) MB/s +42%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	7058 (6624.24^min - 7058.17^max) MB/s +41%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	6807 (5521.87^min - 6807.36^max) MB/s +36%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)	6313 MB/s +26%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	5018 (4387.69^min - 5018.48^max) MB/s 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4998 (4326.58^min - 4998^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (3728 - 5023, n=18)	4902 MB/s -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4869 (4298.53^min - 4868.87^max) MB/s -3%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	6008 (5990.93^min - 6007.71^max) MB/s +89%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	5265 (5223.42^min - 5264.69^max) MB/s +65%
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5250 (5191.5^min - 5250.22^max) MB/s +65%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)	4851 MB/s +52%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3288 (3266.73^min - 3287.63^max) MB/s +3%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (2957 - 3464, n=18)	3238 MB/s +2%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3187 (3173.56^min - 3187.38^max) MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3140 (3055.76^min - 3139.87^max) MB/s -1%
4k q1 t1 read
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	95.2 (94.25^min - 95.19^max) MB/s +115%
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	83.5 (82.8^min - 83.52^max) MB/s +89%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	72.2 (66.43^min - 72.17^max) MB/s +63%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)	65.9 MB/s +49%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	62.9 (61.89^min - 62.92^max) MB/s +42%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (41.9 - 73.3, n=18)	56.6 MB/s +28%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	54.3 (54.05^min - 54.29^max) MB/s +23%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	44.2 (43.54^min - 44.16^max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	270 (268.96^min - 269.65^max) MB/s +177%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	229 (227.99^min - 229^max) MB/s +135%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)	223 MB/s +128%
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	198.1 (195.9^min - 198.06^max) MB/s +103%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (78 - 318, n=18)	176.8 MB/s +81%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	174.8 (171.24^min - 174.76^max) MB/s +79%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	143.7 (139.68^min - 143.66^max) MB/s +47%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	97.6 (96.73^min - 97.61^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	3764 (3700.88^min - 3763.72^max) MB/s +358%
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3630 (3471.35^min - 3629.9^max) MB/s +342%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)	2568 MB/s +212%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1544 (1272.83^min - 1543.53^max) MB/s +88%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1189 (1150.47^min - 1189.25^max) MB/s +45%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1075 (1073.42^min - 1075.48^max) MB/s +31%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (592 - 1544, n=18)	1061 MB/s +29%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	822 (788.59^min - 821.86^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	3717 (3584.28^min - 3717.4^max) MB/s +841%
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3003 (2991.33^min - 3002.71^max) MB/s +660%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)	2130 MB/s +439%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2038 (1836.85^min - 2038.27^max) MB/s +416%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (227 - 2783, n=18)	1030 MB/s +161%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	714 (704.85^min - 714.01^max) MB/s +81%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	480 (467.08^min - 480.46^max) MB/s +22%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	395 (366.26^min - 394.87^max) MB/s

AS SSD
Score Total
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	9056 Points +120%
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8059 Points +96%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	7962 Points +94%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=156, last 2 years)	6745 Points +64%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	5043 Points +23%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (2750 - 5610, n=16)	4109 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4108 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4092 Points 0%
Score Read
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	3368 Points +165%
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3005 Points +137%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=156, last 2 years)	2446 Points +93%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	2044 Points +61%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1749 Points +38%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1571 Points +24%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (961 - 1761, n=16)	1353 Points +7%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1270 Points
Score Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	4954 Points +119%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	4018 Points +77%
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3573 Points +58%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=156, last 2 years)	3112 Points +37%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2449 Points +8%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2264 Points
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (651 - 3010, n=16)	2134 Points -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1792 Points -21%
Seq Read
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	5622.8 MB/s +51%
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5592.15 MB/s +50%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	5182.51 MB/s +39%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=156, last 2 years)	4938 MB/s +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4260.13 MB/s +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4011.35 MB/s +8%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (3074 - 4328, n=16)	3878 MB/s +4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3717 MB/s
Seq Write
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	4482.43 MB/s +124%
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4431.18 MB/s +122%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=156, last 2 years)	3759 MB/s +88%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3368.17 MB/s +69%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3100.95 MB/s +55%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2390.9 MB/s +20%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (1536 - 3101, n=16)	2299 MB/s +15%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1997 MB/s
4K Read
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	84.56 MB/s +64%
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	71.52 MB/s +39%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=156, last 2 years)	65.3 MB/s +27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	65.08 MB/s +26%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	56.75 MB/s +10%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	51.5 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	49.86 MB/s -3%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (36.6 - 61.3, n=16)	49.7 MB/s -3%
4K Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	278.27 MB/s +58%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	231.38 MB/s +31%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=156, last 2 years)	212 MB/s +20%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (117 - 512, n=16)	205 MB/s +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	187.56 MB/s +6%
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	179.15 MB/s +2%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	176.5 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	171.2 MB/s -3%
4K-64 Read
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	2721.41 MB/s +222%
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2374.63 MB/s +181%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=156, last 2 years)	1881 MB/s +122%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1460.82 MB/s +73%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1266.17 MB/s +50%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1120.03 MB/s +32%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (551 - 1272, n=16)	916 MB/s +8%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	846 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	4338.89 MB/s +130%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	3338.79 MB/s +77%
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2951.09 MB/s +56%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=156, last 2 years)	2526 MB/s +34%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1951.29 MB/s +3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1888 MB/s
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (172.9 - 2500, n=16)	1717 MB/s -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1381.35 MB/s -27%
Access Time Read
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.09 ms * -45%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (0.03 - 0.17, n=16)	0.07281 ms * -17%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.063 ms * -2%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.062 ms *
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=155, last 2 years)	0.05538 ms * +11%
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.047 ms * +24%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	0.038 ms * +39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	0.038 ms * +39%
Access Time Write
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.073 ms * -248%
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.07 ms * -233%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=156, last 2 years)	0.04826 ms * -130%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (0.016 - 0.088, n=16)	0.03494 ms * -66%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.021 ms *
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.02 ms * +5%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	0.019 ms * +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	0.018 ms * +14%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4987 (4612.69-5000.03)

Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7063 (6446.85-7107.46)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4051 (3359.22-6717.81)

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4300 (3774.46-4795.98)

图形卡

惠普预兆 17 使用英伟达GeForce RTX 4070显卡。此外，您还可以购买配备 RTX 4060.这两款显卡中较大的一款非常适合 QHD 显示屏。在最新的游戏中，如果我们还想获得超过 60 FPS 的帧数，只需放弃最高细节设置即可。

RTX 4070 的最大功耗为 120 瓦，低于其允许的最大值 140 瓦。但这并不十分明显，尤其是在 3DMark 的合成基准测试中，有时我们甚至会观察到相反的情况。例如华硕 TUF Gaming A17在纸面上配备了 140 瓦的 RTX 4070，但整体性能却落后 9%。不过，在游戏性能方面，两者的差距较小。我们可能看到了惠普 Omen 17 不需要节流的效果。

在其他电源模式下，功率值进一步降低。在 "平衡 "模式下，功率仍为 90 瓦，性能最多降低 10%。在 "Eco "模式和电池工作模式下，显卡的功耗仅为 40 瓦，功耗下降更为明显。虽然不那么复杂的游戏仍然可以玩，但帧速率会降低三分之一。

您可以在我们的 GPU 基准列表.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	92.3 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	79.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	75.7 pt
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	75.2 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX	73 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	72.9 pt
Alienware m16 R2 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	71.8 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71.2 pt
HP Omen 16-b0085ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	65.6 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	61.5 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	61.2 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	58713 Points +36%
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	45199 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	44546 Points +3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX	44538 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)	43857 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	43236 Points
Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	42296 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24229 - 46434, n=61)	40495 Points -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	36493 Points -16%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	34644 Points -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	32236 Points -25%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	172589 Points
HP Omen 16-b0085ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	158182 Points -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (54238 - 193851, n=26)	145806 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=100, last 2 years)	143245 Points -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	141689 Points -18%
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	127697 Points -26%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	119428 Points -31%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	41431 Points +30%
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	33058 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	31765 Points
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=192, last 2 years)	31443 Points -1%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX	31091 Points -2%
Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	30932 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	30438 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12242 - 33451, n=64)	29065 Points -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	28015 Points -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	24618 Points -22%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	24384 Points -23%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	18954 Points +51%
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	13282 Points +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	13166 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=187, last 2 years)	13142 Points +5%
Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12997 Points +4%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX	12900 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12536 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (5012 - 13391, n=62)	11625 Points -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	10189 Points -19%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	10019 Points -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	9421 Points -25%

3DMark 11 Performance		35016 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		65355 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		27594 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		12346 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		2743 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	28 Seconds * -27%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	22 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18 - 30, n=61)	21.5 Seconds * +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	21 Seconds * +5%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=176, last 2 years)	20.9 Seconds * +5%
Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	20 Seconds * +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	19 Seconds * +14%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX	19 Seconds * +14%
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	17 Seconds * +23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	13 Seconds * +41%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	45 Seconds * -36%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	41 Seconds * -24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32 - 181, n=64)	40.5 Seconds * -23%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=182, last 2 years)	36.5 Seconds * -11%
Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	33 Seconds * -0%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX	33 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	33 Seconds *
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	32 Seconds * +3%
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	28 Seconds * +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	22 Seconds * +33%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	329 Seconds * -3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	318 Seconds *
Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	296 Seconds * +7%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=187, last 2 years)	295 Seconds * +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	293 Seconds * +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	291 Seconds * +8%
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	289 Seconds * +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (158 - 440, n=61)	289 Seconds * +9%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX	245 Seconds * +23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	187 Seconds * +41%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

在全高清分辨率下，HP Omen 17 的细节设置仅为高分辨率，而非最高分辨率，就能稳定地超过 100 FPS。这也适用于当前的游戏。在几款游戏中，与其他配备 RTX 4070 的游戏笔记本电脑的差距只有几个百分点。华硕华硕 TUF Gaming A15的优势仅为 4%。但《赛博朋克 2077 2.1》等对图形要求较高的游戏在 Omen 17 上的可玩性要高得多。不过，较小的 GPU 仍能在目视水平下驾驭较老的游戏。

更安静的 "平衡 "模式与最高性能之间的差距仍然很小。即使在这种情况下，通常也能达到 100 FPS。因此我们可以说，总的来说，降低 TGP 的决定并没有给游戏带来任何值得一提的严重弊端。由于可用计算性能保持稳定，Omen 17 甚至在持续负载的情况下还有优势。

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	99.6 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	80.1 pt
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	78.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	74.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z ^-1! Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	69.9 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	68.1 pt
Alienware m16 R2 ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	68.1 pt
HP Omen 16-b0085ng ^-2! Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	67.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 ^-1! AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66.1 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	65.3 pt

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	139 (6.45^min, 100^P1) fps +34%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	127.8 (8.14^min, 90.9^P1) fps +23%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=168, last 2 years)	113.7 fps +9%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	109.7 (5.96^min, 71.4^P1) fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	108.1 (4.18^min, 76.9^P1) fps +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	107.2 (4.45^min, 76.9^P1) fps +3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	103.9 (5.11^min, 71.4^P1) fps
HP Omen 16-b0085ng Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	103 (6.42^min, 71.4^P1) fps -1%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	178 fps +52%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	129 fps +10%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	122.1 fps +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	121.9 fps +4%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=180, last 2 years)	119.9 fps +2%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119.3 fps +2%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117.2 fps
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	100.7 fps -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	94.8 fps -19%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	337 (16.7^min, 246^P1) fps +58%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	239 (45.7^min, 172.5^P1) fps +12%
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)	229 fps +8%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	219 (38.5^min, 163.7^P1) fps +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	214 (24.3^min, 160.5^P1) fps 0%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	213 (26.4^min, 161.7^P1) fps 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	213 (103.5^min, 157.8^P1) fps
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	184.2 (41^min, 136.6^P1) fps -14%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	178 (45.3^min, 135^P1) fps -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	163.8 (35.9^min, 125.2^P1) fps -23%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	181.7 (153.5^min) fps +44%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	177.4 (149.3^min) fps +40%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	163.4 (140.5^min) fps +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	160.5 (140.4^min) fps +27%
Average of class Gaming (33.2 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)	150.5 fps +19%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	139.7 (120.9^min) fps +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	139.5 (122.4^min) fps +10%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	137 (118.7^min) fps +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	130 (113.9^min) fps +3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	126.3 (102.1^min) fps

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	141.3 fps +58%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	126.9 fps +42%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	126.3 fps +41%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	115 fps +28%
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=192, last 2 years)	108.1 fps +21%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	96.7 fps +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	91.7 fps +2%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	90.8 fps +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	89.5 fps
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	80.7 fps -10%

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	123.1 (100.1^min) fps +38%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	88.9 (73.4^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 144.7, n=79, last 2 years)	86.5 fps -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.3 (61.1^min) fps -3%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	83.9 (35.4^min) fps -6%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	83.3 (37.9^min) fps -6%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	83.1 (28.4^min) fps -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	76.2 (63.3^min) fps -14%

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | F1 23 | F1 24 | Far Cry 5

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	123.1 (100.1^min) fps +38%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	88.9 (73.4^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 144.7, n=79, last 2 years)	86.5 fps -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.3 (61.1^min) fps -3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	83.3 (37.9^min) fps -6%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	83.1 (28.4^min) fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (30.7 - 90.7, n=31)	79.7 fps -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	76.2 (63.3^min) fps -14%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77.6 (64^min) fps +42%
Average of class Gaming (24.8 - 110, n=69, last 2 years)	64.9 fps +19%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	54.5 (42.2^min) fps
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	52.7 (40.5^min) fps -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	51.8 (39.2^min) fps -5%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	51.7 fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24.8 - 57.1, n=30)	49.1 fps -10%

F1 23
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	111.3 (88^min, 85^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (12.9 - 149.2, n=40, last 2 years)	70.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (49.5 - 100, n=14)	68.5 fps
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	70 (55^min, 54^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (17 - 144.6, n=31, last 2 years)	50.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (35.2 - 49, n=13)	42.5 fps

F1 24
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (54.1 - 127, n=14, last 2 years)	78.2 fps +6%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	74.1 (57^min, 60^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (64.7 - 78.1, n=8)	71.2 fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	56.6 (46^min, 46^P1) fps -24%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (36.7 - 84.7, n=11, last 2 years)	54.6 fps +13%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	48.4 (39^min, 39^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (41.1 - 50.9, n=8)	46.2 fps -5%

Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	157 (114^min) fps +43%
Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=101, last 2 years)	131 fps +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (92 - 158, n=35)	127.8 fps +16%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	123 (95^min) fps +12%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	123 (88^min) fps +12%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	121 (96^min) fps +10%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	110 (84^min) fps
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	157 (115^min) fps +45%
Average of class Gaming (71 - 194, n=80, last 2 years)	119.6 fps +11%
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	115 (96^min) fps +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	114 (87^min) fps +6%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	113 (82^min) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (79 - 128, n=32)	109.1 fps +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	108 (86^min) fps

赛博朋克 2077 2.1》的持续负载测试也显示了笔记本电脑性能的稳定性，从开始到结束几乎是一条完美的直线。由于功耗降低，Omen 17 在任何时候都不需要节流。

Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS Chart

HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø79.7 (76.2-80.4)

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø66.8 (63.8-67.8)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø77.5 (72.5-79.1)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø84.5 (67.8-88.1)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	178.9	175.5	163.1	103.9	90.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	152.5	138.8	137.3	126.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	201	155.7	117.2		88.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	128.8	115.7	89.5
Far Cry 5 (2018)	137	123	115	110	108
Strange Brigade (2018)	318	276	240	213	138.3
God of War (2022)	149	129	105	74	60
Hogwarts Legacy (2023)	103	92	87	76	52
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	135.3	122	102.6	88.9	54.5
F1 24 (2024)	205	210	196.6	74.1	48.4

排放 - 不是喷气式飞机

噪音水平

负载情况下的风扇控制显示了成功的冷却效果。即使在性能最高的时刻，噪音也不会令人讨厌，尽管此时噪音清晰可闻。与竞争对手相比，如 Alienware m16 R2在这种情况下，耳机并非绝对必要，但还是建议使用。

在 "平衡 "模式下，Omen 17 的表现更加出色，这只是带来了一些性能上的小限制。只要游戏只是半途而废，你就很难再注意到风扇的噪音。此外，随机附带的软件还能让你轻松地进一步调整风扇转速，以进一步降低噪音水平。

遗憾的是，这款游戏笔记本电脑从未真正保持绝对安静。即使在没有任何负载的情况下，风扇也会时不时地转动起来，虽然不会达到最高转速，但还是非常清晰可闻。Omen 17 远未达到任何临界温度。

Noise Level

Idle		25 / 29 / 33 dB(A)
Load		45 / 52 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
Noise		8%	-5%	-3%	-1%	5%
off / environment *	25	24.7 1%	21.07 16%	25.2 -1%	27.9 -12%	25 -0%
Idle Minimum *	25	25.3 -1%	29.75 -19%	27.8 -11%	28.5 -14%	25 -0%
Idle Average *	29	25.3 13%	29.75 -3%	32 -10%	29.8 -3%	27 7%
Idle Maximum *	33	25.3 23%	29.75 10%	29.6 10%	29.8 10%	33 -0%
Load Average *	45	31.7 30%	54.85 -22%	45.2 -0%	34.8 23%	40 11%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	48					45 6%
Load Maximum *	52	62 -19%	58 -12%	55.8 -7%	57.3 -10%	46 12%
Witcher 3 ultra *		53.8	57.8		57.1

* ... smaller is better

温度

无论是在空闲运行还是在高负载情况下，Omen 17 的温度都比许多同类产品低。特别是掌托几乎不会发热。另一方面，键盘区域的温度在游戏过程中明显升高。在此建议使用外部解决方案，尤其是内置键盘并不令人印象深刻。在上网或办公等简单任务中，整个设备仍然凉爽舒适。您还可以将它舒适地放在腿上使用。

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


42 °C	44 °C	42 °C
37 °C	40 °C	38 °C
26 °C	26 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 35.7 °C


45 °C	44 °C	44 °C
39 °C	42 °C	40 °C
27 °C	27 °C	25 °C

Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 37 °C

Power Supply (max.) 55 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


26 °C	26 °C	26 °C
26 °C	26 °C	26 °C
25 °C	25 °C	25 °C

Maximum: 26 °C
Average: 25.7 °C


26 °C	27 °C	26 °C
26 °C	27 °C	26 °C
25 °C	25 °C	25 °C

Maximum: 27 °C
Average: 25.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 30 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


42 °C	43 °C	42 °C
39 °C	41 °C	37 °C
26 °C	27 °C	28 °C

Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 36.1 °C


46 °C	43 °C	45 °C
41 °C	44 °C	39 °C
26 °C	30 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 37.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 60 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.9 °C / 1.6 F).

	HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Heat		-27%	-18%	-23%	11%	-18%
Maximum Upper Side *	44	44.8 -2%	47.8 -9%	58 -32%	40 9%	53 -20%
Maximum Bottom *	45	48 -7%	52.2 -16%	45.2 -0%	33.6 25%	46 -2%
Idle Upper Side *	26	37.2 -43%	32.4 -25%	31.1 -20%	26.6 -2%	32 -23%
Idle Bottom *	27	42 -56%	33 -22%	37.2 -38%	24.4 10%	34 -26%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

当使用 Prime95 对 CPU 进行满负荷运行时，其允许功耗为 65 瓦。虽然这一数值小于某些采用相同 CPU 的竞争对手，但在较长时间内保持不变。核心温度保持在可接受的 80 °C（176 °F）或更低。

只有在显卡负载增加的情况下，惠普 Omen 17 才会达到极限。当两个组件都以最高性能运行时，CPU 的功耗保持在最大值 50 瓦（减去 GPU 的动态提升），显卡的功耗保持在最大值 120 瓦。随后，CPU 的温度将升至近 90 °C（194 °F），GPU 的温度将升至 75 °C（167 °F）。

在压力测试期间，CPU 的时钟频率保持在 4,500 MHz 左右，当加入图形芯片后，时钟频率将降至 4,000 MHz 左右。

发言人

扬声器给人的印象好坏参半。主要用于动作游戏的中低音听起来出人意料地出色和有力。声音听起来也很自然，并具有一定的细节深度。

深沉的低音完全没有出现，而中低音，即吉他或鼓声的音域，则显得很薄弱。同样明显的是，声音很容易被其他噪音掩盖。这款扬声器在玩游戏时尚可，但对于整体表现平平的扬声器来说，无论是视频流还是听音乐都不应该列入推荐的使用场景。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP Omen 17-db0079ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 高效的游戏笔记本电脑

耗电量

有限的最大功耗并不令人惊讶，因为 CPU 和 GPU 都略有节流。我们测得的最大值为 230 瓦，比配备该显卡的其他机型的功耗低近 10%。

另一方面，我们对无负载情况下的功耗进行了测量，这才是真正难能可贵的。有时，Omen 17 的耗电量仅为竞争对手的 50%。这也解释了为什么几乎没有发热现象，而且电池续航时间也很短。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / Watt
Idle	6 / 12 / 18 Watt
Load	71 / 228 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-38%	-59%	-122%	-20%	6%	-45%	-58%
Idle Minimum *	6	8.1 -35%	10.71 -79%	26.7 -345%	6.2 -3%	7 -17%	12.4 ?(4.3 - 31, n=52) -107%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=153, last 2 years) -125%
Idle Average *	12	13 -8%	14.75 -23%	24.4 -103%	21.8 -82%	12 -0%	17.5 ?(4.6 - 35.1, n=52) -46%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=153, last 2 years) -58%
Idle Maximum *	18	40.3 -124%	30 -67%	32.7 -82%	22 -22%	18 -0%	24.2 ?(9 - 55.4, n=52) -34%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=153, last 2 years) -48%
Load Average *	71	79 -11%	135 -90%	122.1 -72%	59.2 17%	70 1%	98.2 ?(59.2 - 178, n=52) -38%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=152, last 2 years) -50%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	197					146.8 25%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	191.8					146.2 24%
Load Maximum *	228	254.9 -12%	307 -35%	241 -6%	247.8 -9%	206 10%	223 ?(107 - 319, n=52) 2%	250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=153, last 2 years) -10%
Witcher 3 ultra *		188.1	286	190.6	189.7

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test

HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø221 (217-228)

Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø228 (164-255)

HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø11.8 (5.73-17.8)

Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø8.5 (5.77-15)

HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø197 (195.3-201)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø101.1 (100.5-103.5)

Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø168 (133.5-182.6)

Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø160.1 (157.7-162.6)

HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø102.6 (101.9-103.6)

HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø156.6 (153.5-163.8)

Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø197.8 (187.5-211)

HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø13.7 (6.87-21.9)

Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø8.07 (0.00453-20.2)

HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø191.8 (189.4-195.7)

电池寿命

正如我们所预期的那样，考虑到适中的功耗，电池续航时间在计算性能方面处于较高水平。虽然电池容量为 83 瓦时，比其他中端游戏笔记本电脑的电池容量要小，但在我们的网上冲浪测试中，运行时间略微超过了 9 小时。在测试过程中，显示屏亮度降低到 150 cd/m²，这在通常情况下也足以满足桌面办公的需要，一般在晚间进行。

在最大亮度下，Omen 17 的效率并不高。由于显示屏较大，电池续航时间几乎减半，仅为 5 小时。播放视频的效率也较低。在视频流播放过程中，集成显卡的使用也变得相当充分。但至少电池续航时间几乎达到了 8 小时大关。

虽然电池续航时间在整体上可能并不突出，但对于游戏笔记本电脑来说已经达到了不错的水平。

Battery Runtime

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd		0h 59min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 04min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		5h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 42min

	HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90.61 Wh	Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-11%	-11%	-53%	1%	29%	-21%
H.264	462		451 -2%	242 -48%			409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years) -11%
WiFi v1.3	544	483 -11%	434 -20%	227 -58%	548 1%	702 29%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=152, last 2 years) -31%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd	59
Witcher 3 ultra			57				78.3 ?(47 - 155, n=16, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 高稳定的游戏性能

+ 风扇噪音适中

+ 发热量可接受

+ 240 Hz 显示屏

+ 电池寿命长

+ 维护简单

Cons

- 笨重

- 对比度和黑色值不够理想

- 连接点少，有些连接点的电流不足

- 键盘简单

- 糟糕的网络摄像头

结论 - 专注于游戏需要做出一些妥协

惠普 Omen 17（2024）是一款纯粹的游戏笔记本电脑，在任何地方都不会提供比必要设备更多的配置。因此，它既能为要求苛刻的游戏提供更高的计算性能，又能提供可接受的价格。

第八代 RTX 4070 和 AMD Ryzen 7 与 QHD 显示屏搭配得很好，即使其 240 赫兹的刷新率在当前的游戏中几乎不可能达到。遗憾的是，显示器的其他特性不足以在高水平上处理图像处理等任务。

快速游戏的同时，风扇噪音也很低，但 Omen 17 并没有提供更多。

成功之处还在于冷却系统的实现。惠普将 CPU 和 GPU 配置为低于其最大性能运行，充分利用了 17 英寸笔记本电脑的内部空间。即使在最高负载的情况下，风扇噪音仍然可以承受。在 "平衡 "模式下，风扇噪音甚至消失得无影无踪。

在其余所有方面，都有一些重大的妥协。连接有限，而且可用的连接速度相对较慢。网络摄像头和扬声器最多只能满足最低要求。最后，输入设备只在有限的范围内适用于游戏，因此你不仅要添加常用的游戏鼠标，还要添加合适的键盘。

虽然游戏性能相当的竞争对手往往能提供更好的整体解决方案，但它们的价格也更高。华硕 TUF GAMING AF2 是一款配置不高，甚至显示屏也较弱，但至少提供了坚实键盘的替代产品。华硕 TUF Gaming A17 F707.华硕 TUF Gaming A17 F707 拥有两个雷电 4 接口和出色的显示屏。宏碁掠夺者 Helios Neo 16显然是一款更好的笔记本电脑。但如果我们只考虑纯粹的游戏性能，这两款笔记本电脑的速度都没有明显提升，只是声音更大而已。

价格和供应情况

惠普 Omen 17（2024）可直接从惠普购买，999 美元起。您可以配置组件，我们测试的配置为 RTX 4070 和 QHD 显示屏，价格约为 1660 美元。亚马逊提供配备相同处理器但使用 RTX 4050 的机型，售价约为 1500 美元。

请注意，我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果已不能与第 7 版相比。您可以在这里.

HP Omen 17-db0079ng - 07/22/2024 v8
Mario Petzold

Chassis

77 / 98 → 78%

Keyboard

83%

Pointing Device

78%

Connectivity

57 / 80 → 71%

Weight

58 / 10-68 → 82%

Battery

86 / 95 → 90%

Display

82%

Games Performance

86%

Application Performance

83%

Temperature

89 / 95 → 93%

Noise

70 / 90 → 77%

Audio

72%

Camera

39 / 75 → 52%

Average

67%

80%

Gaming - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
68.6%

Materials
50%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
83.4%

Repairability
50%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 54.1%

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 463597 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普预兆 17（2024）评测：RTX 4070 和 Ryzen 7 在游戏笔记本电脑中大显身手

Mario Petzold, 2024-07-26 (Update: 2024-07-26)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit in comparison
Lenovo B50-30 (min) N2815, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	49
...
Beelink SER7 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	2565
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2567
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	2568
HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2575
HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A R7 8845HS, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU	2575
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2576
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2580
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	15842

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	34960
Aorus 15X ASF i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	34985
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	35000
HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	35016
Minisforum G7 PT R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7600M XT	35029
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	35070
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 2023 Engineering Sample i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	35153
...
(max) R7 9800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	77609

潜在的竞争对手比较

案例 - 大型重型游戏机

尺寸比较

连接设备 - 奥门 17，亮点不多

交流

网络摄像头

维护

可持续性

保修

输入设备 - HP Omen 17 仅提供标准功能

显示屏 - 根据所提供的游戏性能进行了很好的调整

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - Omen 17 是一款性能均衡的游戏笔记本电脑

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储解决方案

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS Chart

排放 - 不是喷气式飞机

噪音水平

温度

压力测试

发言人

HP Omen 17-db0079ng audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

电源管理 - 高效的游戏笔记本电脑

耗电量

Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test

Power Consumption With External Monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 专注于游戏需要做出一些妥协

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison