Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar酷睿i7-1370P性能首次亮相：框架笔记本13.5英寸13代英特尔评测
今年，Framework公司带着其第三次迭代的13.5英寸Framework笔记本电脑回来了。正如预期的那样，2023年的Framework 13.5采用了与之前2022年和2021年型号基本相同的底盘骨架和材料，以促进最终用户的可持续性、可维修性和回收。因此，我们建议查看我们的 关于2021型号的现有评论以了解更多关于该系列的物理特征，因为它们迄今为止一直保持不变。
2023型号的区别因素是其英特尔第13代酷睿-P处理器，以取代旧型号上的第12代和第11代选项。一个 AMD版本该型号的AMD版本预计将在今年晚些时候推出，还有一个 16英寸版本带独立显卡的16英寸版本也将面世。不断扩大的产品组合表明，该公司正在以其独特的笔记本电脑设计方法取得强有力的进展。
我们的具体配置是采用酷睿i7-1370P的最高端SKU，价格约为2000美元。配备酷睿i5-1340P和i7-1360P的较小的SKU也可用于较低的起始价格。
Framework 13.5的竞争者包括其他专业消费型副笔记本，如微软Surface Laptop,戴尔XPS 13 Plus,惠普Spectre x360 13.5, 或联想Yoga Pro 7 14 。当然，大多数替代品并不像框架那样容易拆卸或维修。
更多Framework评论：
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.2 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel i7-1370P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.85 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
| 85.1 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.85 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
| 90.3 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 17 mm | 13.50" | 3000x2000 | |
| 84.7 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2021 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.5 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
| 85.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1 kg | 11.8 mm | 13.30" | 2880x1800 | |
| 85.3 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | HP ProBook 445 G8-3Z6Q8ES R5 5600U, Vega 7 | 1.4 kg | 19.8 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.9 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 |
外壳 - 与2021年的原始型号相同
沟通
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
网络摄像头
维护
终端用户的可维修性仍然是行业中最好的之一，因为它是Framework系列的基础。该模型可以很容易地拆卸，而且Framework甚至可以单独销售组件，这与大多数其他制造商不同。独立组件在选定的市场上与Laptop 13.5一起提供（美国、加拿大、英国、德国、法国、爱尔兰、荷兰、奥地利和澳大利亚），今年夏天还会有四个市场（比利时、意大利、西班牙、台湾）。
要拆解该设备，只需松开底部的五颗螺丝，然后再将笔记本电脑翻转到右侧。将显示屏完全打开180度，然后用底座周围的锋利边缘取下磁性键盘甲板，露出主板，如下图所示。在进一步拆卸之前，请确保拆下连接键盘板和主板以及电池和主板的黑色带状电缆。
框架的设计与大多数其他笔记本电脑不同，它的主板是从顶部而不是从底部进行维修的。
除了本评论中的预配置型号外，来自我们YouTube频道的Alex收到了一套DIY的Framework笔记本。在下面的视频中，他展示了Framework 13.5笔记本的一步步组装过程：
只需使用每个零售盒中的T5螺丝刀就可以完全拆卸笔记本电脑，而其他大多数笔记本电脑往往需要多种工具。缺点是你必须记住哪颗螺丝放在哪里，因为有大约二十几颗螺丝需要跟踪。如果制造商能够找到一种方法，既对螺丝进行颜色编码，又减少总数量，那么部件更换就会更加容易。
要更换显示面板，首先要取下它周围的磁性挡板，如下图所示，露出四个角上的四个螺丝。然后，简单地卸下四个螺丝和沿左下方的单根带状电缆。虽然我们很欣赏这种直接的步骤，但令人遗憾的是，Framework目前没有提供其他面板选项供其选择。
请注意，这里的冷却解决方案与笔记本电脑相比相对较小，如 HP Spectre x360 13.5或华硕Zenbook S 13等笔记本相比，这里的散热方案相对较小，因为它们有对称布局的双风扇。这对框架的温度和风扇噪音有直接影响，我们在下面的章节中会说明。
配件和保修
端口的扩展卡不包括在价格中，因此必须在结账时单独添加。根据选择，这些卡的价格从9美元到149美元不等。今年的新产品是SSD卡，每个USB-C端口可快速增加到1TB。
框架现在还在运送第二代HDMI和DisplayPort扩展卡，其形式和功能与第一代卡相同。第二代扩展卡使笔记本电脑在连接外部显示器时能保持低功耗状态，这应该能解决现有用户可能遇到的某些睡眠和功耗问题。制造商说，现有的第一代DisplayPort卡只需简单的固件更新就可以升级到第二代，但第一代HDMI卡需要进行硬件改装。不幸的是，现有的第一代HDMI卡的所有者没有以旧换新的计划。用户可以通过寻找第二代卡上的蓝点来直观地区分第一代和第二代卡。
到目前为止，所有的卡和单独的组件都与所有的Laptop 13.5型号兼容，不管是哪一年还是哪一代。因此，旧机器的可升级性得到了保留。即便如此，如果你打算升级处理器，必须更换整个主板，而且你也不能简单地把英特尔主板换成AMD的。
制造商的有限保修期为一年，而像戴尔或联想这样的大型制造商往往为其高端商务笔记本电脑提供三年的标准保修期。
显示器 - 仅限60赫兹IPS
2023型号使用与2022和2021型号相同的京东方CQ NE135FBM-N41 IPS面板，没有其他选项可供选择。同时，竞争对手如惠普Spectre x360 13.5或 华硕Zenbook S 13正在运送OLED选项，以获得更深、更鲜艳的色彩。虽然京东方的IPS面板并不差，但要求AdobeRGB或P3颜色的图形设计师或编辑将不得不把目光投向框架系列之外。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 503 cd/m²
Contrast: 1397:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.38 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.21
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.13
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel BOE CQ NE135FBM-N41, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel BOE CQ NE135FBM-N41, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Framework Laptop 13.5 BOE CQ NE135FBM-N41, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 SDC4160, OLED, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K LQ134R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.4" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 LQ135P1JX51, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 0% | 25% | 7% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 68.9 | 69.9 1% | 69 0% | 99.9 45% | 76.5 11% | 64.7 -6% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.5 | 99.4 2% | 99.3 2% | 100 3% | 100 3% | 97.2 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.1 | 71.1 0% | 70.3 -1% | 90.8 28% | 76 7% | 66.9 -6% |
| Response Times | 28% | -4% | 96% | 32% | -17% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 54.9 ? | 34.7 ? 37% | 55.6 ? -1% | 1.9 ? 97% | 38.9 ? 29% | 62.8 ? -14% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 33.5 ? | 27.5 ? 18% | 36 ? -7% | 2.16 ? 94% | 21.9 ? 35% | 39.8 ? -19% |
| PWM Frequency | 60.2 ? | 21930 ? | ||||
| Screen | 6% | 2% | 9% | 12% | 12% | |
| Brightness middle | 503 | 449.6 -11% | 449 -11% | 351.7 -30% | 494 -2% | 413 -18% |
| Brightness | 472 | 431 -9% | 435 -8% | 351 -26% | 474 0% | 400 -15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 90 3% | 93 7% | 87 0% | 89 2% | 94 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.31 14% | 0.39 -8% | 0.28 22% | 0.29 19% | |
| Contrast | 1397 | 1450 4% | 1151 -18% | 1764 26% | 1424 2% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.38 | 2.76 18% | 2.34 31% | 1.78 47% | 3.1 8% | 2.8 17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.08 | 7.96 -12% | 7.07 -0% | 6.14 13% | 4.2 41% | 7.2 -2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.21 | 0.58 52% | 0.96 21% | 1.5 -24% | 0.8 34% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 5.2 -8% | 4.7 2% | 2.3 52% | 3.2 33% | 1.9 60% |
| Gamma | 2.13 103% | 2.23 99% | 2.29 96% | 2.11 104% | 2.41 91% | 2.12 104% |
| CCT | 6235 104% | 6475 100% | 6760 96% | 6683 97% | 6189 105% | 6510 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.6 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.2 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 12% /
8% | -1% /
1% | 43% /
29% | 17% /
14% | -3% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 54.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - 猛禽湖酷睿i7-1370P
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前，我们通过Windows将我们的设备设置为性能模式。与主要制造商不同，Framework在其机器上没有安装专门的命令中心软件或相关的臃肿软件。
处理器
框架13.5配备了第13代 酷睿i7-1370P是市场上最快的子笔记本之一。原始多线程性能可与更耗电的 Ryzen 9 6900HS同时在这个过程中提供25%到30%的单线程性能。这是一个不错的升级，从去年的 酷睿i7-1260P选项也提升了约20%到30%。同年的性能提升足以媲美 酷睿i7-12700H通常在许多大型游戏笔记本电脑上发现，如MSI Pulse GL76.
降级到 酷睿i7-1360P和 酷睿i5-1340P配置，预计将影响性能约10％至15％，根据我们的经验，20％至25％。联想Yoga 9i 14IRP G8和三星Galaxy Book3 Pro 16，分别是。所有这三种选择都明显比通常的酷睿U驱动的超极本快。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (5618 - 11995, n=3) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (7906 - 8733, n=3) | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (28284 - 32966, n=3) | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (2964 - 6372, n=3) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (27048 - 39240, n=3) | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
系统性能
由于采用了非常快的酷睿i7-1370P，PCMark基准测试超过了去年的机型和大多数竞争机型。尽管如此，该框架仍然落后于一些高端超极本，如 华硕Zenbook S 13因为Iris Xe明显比竞争对手的Radeon 680M要慢。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5466 - 6418, n=2) | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10693 - 11807, n=2) | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7320 - 7792, n=2) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5662 - 7799, n=2) | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1728 - 1827, n=2) | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1675 - 1722, n=2) | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1875 - 2068, n=2) | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1484 - 1504, n=2) | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6418 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (46184 - 69471, n=3) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (50228 - 66704, n=3) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (47356 - 85119, n=3) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (72.5 - 94.6, n=3) | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示，在打开我们的主页的多个浏览器标签或运行Prime95压力数秒时，没有DPC问题，这比以前的型号有改进。在60FPS下的4K视频播放也几乎无懈可击，只记录了2个丢帧。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配备了中档的 WD PC SN740PCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘，比去年测试设备上的SN850要慢。传输速率最高为5200MB/s，而SN850为7000MB/s。不过，性能还是很好的，对于目标用户来说是绰绰有余的。我们设备中的硬盘在受压时也没有表现出节流问题。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能--Iris Xe连续三年蝉联冠军
图形性能比我们数据库中具有相同集成度的平均笔记本电脑快约15%。 Iris Xe 96 EUsGPU。虽然值得尊敬，但这里的GPU自3年前成立以来基本上没有变化。框架打算在今年晚些时候提供更快的集成AMD Radeon 680M作为替代。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7882 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 24426 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5321 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1951 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender | |
| v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G8-3Z6Q8ES | |
| HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (336 - 1259, n=101) | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
像《DOTA 2》这样要求不高的游戏可以在低设置下以原生分辨率播放。否则，大多数游戏必须以更低的分辨率运行，以保持帧率。幸运的是，如果游戏是重要的，该系统与电子GPU兼容。
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 119.5 | 106.3 | 22.2 | 8.95 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 107.2 | 67.6 | 35.4 | 16.5 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 131.8 | 92.4 | 69 | 62.7 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 45.1 | 24.3 | 18 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 50.5 | 36.9 | 36.5 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 99.7 | 42.4 | 34.1 | 27.6 |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 32.5 | 26.4 | 16.4 | 14.1 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 49.8 | 45.3 | 33 | 25.4 |
排放--在重负荷下非常响亮
系统噪音
框架笔记本仍然是其尺寸级别中较响亮的次笔记本之一。虽然它在浏览或视频流等低负荷时一般都很安静，但当引入更多要求较高的负荷时，单个内部风扇会迅速升温。例如，在最初的3DMark 06基准测试场景中，风扇噪音会达到45 dB(A)以上，而Spectre x360 13.5或XPS 13 Plus只有27 dB(A)或40 dB(A)。 XPS 13 Plus分别为27 dB(A)或40 dB(A)。在游戏时，框架变得更加响亮，几乎达到50 dB(A)。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23.2 / 23.2 / 23.2 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 45.3 / 49.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.2 dB(A) | ||
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1370P, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Framework Laptop 13.5 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 WDS100T1X0E | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 0% | -1% | 11% | -0% | 3% | |
| off / environment * | 23.2 | 22.8 2% | 23.9 -3% | 23.5 -1% | 24.4 -5% | 24.2 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.2 | 23 1% | 23.9 -3% | 23.5 -1% | 24.4 -5% | 24.2 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 23.2 | 23 1% | 23.9 -3% | 23.5 -1% | 24.4 -5% | 24.2 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.2 | 23 1% | 23.9 -3% | 23.5 -1% | 25.5 -10% | 24.2 -4% |
| Load Average * | 45.3 | 47.3 -4% | 45.6 -1% | 27 40% | 40.4 11% | 39.5 13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.9 | 47.3 1% | 47.1 2% | 36.2 24% | 45.5 5% | |
| Load Maximum * | 49.2 | 49.8 -1% | 47.9 3% | 42.4 14% | 45.5 8% | 39.5 20% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
当长时间运行高要求的负载时，后部的表面温度可以达到39摄氏度至42摄氏度，而更薄更轻的XPS 13 Plus则为49摄氏度。掌托处保持相对凉爽，而底部一般较热，但不会让人感到不舒服。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.6 °C / 76.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+3.1 °C / 5.6 F).
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 1% | -5% | 13% | -10% | -2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 38.2 | 36.8 4% | 47.2 -24% | 36.4 5% | 41.1 -8% | 44.6 -17% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 41.4 | 42.4 -2% | 39.4 5% | 37 11% | 48.8 -18% | 46.9 -13% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25.8 | 24.2 6% | 25.2 2% | 20.8 19% | 28 -9% | 23.7 8% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27.6 | 29 -5% | 27.8 -1% | 22.6 18% | 29.3 -6% | 24.1 13% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当运行Prime95压力时，酷睿i7-1370P会在大约20秒内提升到3.6 GHz和54 W，直到达到92 C。此后，时钟速率和电路板功耗会稳步下降，然后分别稳定在2.1 GHz和30 W。这些结果不出所料地类似于 去年的模型因为这两个处理器都是在类似的功率包络和冷却条件下运行。
运行时的GPU时钟速率 Witcher 3将稳定在1500兆赫，而去年的型号为1200至1400兆赫，代表图形性能的轻微增加。然而，这似乎是以更高的核心温度和更高的功耗为代价的；较新型号的CPU将稳定在93℃，或比以前高10℃。
| CPU时钟（GHz） | GPU时钟（MHz） | CPU平均温度（°C） | |
| 系统空闲 | -- | -- | 41 |
| Prime95压力 | 2.1 | -- | 85 |
| Prime95 + FurMark压力 | 1.8 | 750 | 83 |
| Witcher 3 应力 | 0.9 | 1500 | 93 |
发言人
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
消耗功率
在桌面上空转，实际上会比去年的机型少消耗几瓦特，这可能部分解释了下一节中更长的电池寿命。当运行Prime95时，尽管2022和2023型号的性能更高，但其消耗量几乎相同。因此，从12代酷睿i7-1260P跳到13代酷睿i7-1370P时，每瓦性能略高。
当运行 Witcher 3代表GPU重度负载时，功耗将比去年的机型高出约21%。这些结果与上面提到的稍快和更稳定的GPU时钟速率相关。
在运行Prime95时，我们能够从小型（约5.8 x 5.8 x 2.7厘米）的60瓦交流适配器测量到最大功耗为60.8瓦。因此，如果同时运行高要求的负载，电池的充电速度会大大降低。转移到一个更密集的80瓦或更高的交流适配器可以解决这个问题。
| Off / Standby | 0.45 / 1 Watt |
| Idle | 2.9 / 6.3 / 9.9 Watt |
| Load |
56.2 / 60.8 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel i7-1370P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Framework Laptop 13.5 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 WDS100T1X0E, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, OLED, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.4" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -19% | -4% | 0% | -38% | 11% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.9 | 5.3 -83% | 4.3 -48% | 4 -38% | 7 -141% | 2.6 10% |
| Idle Average * | 6.3 | 8.4 -33% | 8.2 -30% | 4.9 22% | 11 -75% | 6 5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.9 | 11.2 -13% | 8.7 12% | 12.5 -26% | 11.4 -15% | 8.2 17% |
| Load Average * | 56.2 | 57.4 -2% | 43.5 23% | 48.1 14% | 59.7 -6% | 41.4 26% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 56.6 | 46.7 17% | 43.5 23% | 35.8 37% | 49.4 13% | |
| Load Maximum * | 60.8 | 61.2 -1% | 61.8 -2% | 65.2 -7% | 63 -4% | 64.1 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
WLAN的运行时间比去年的型号长了一个多小时，部分原因是这次的电池容量略高（61Wh对55Wh）。8.5小时的电池寿命也比许多竞争对手长，包括微软Surface Laptop 4 13.
从空电到满电大约需要90分钟。有时，Windows的估计充电时间可能显示为5个多小时，但如果你没有运行任何苛刻的负载，这是不准确的。
| Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel i7-1370P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 61 Wh | Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh | Framework Laptop 13.5 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 66 Wh | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 47.4 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -15% | -9% | -9% | -21% | -14% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 527 | 447 -15% | 478 -9% | 481 -9% | 414 -21% | 454 -14% |
| Reader / Idle | 1223 | |||||
| Load | 133 | 76 | 81 | |||
| H.264 | 657 | 667 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 终端用户定制选项不够多
框架笔记本电脑13.5的三个最佳方面是其可修复性、处理器性能和端口的多功能性。新的第13代酷睿-P处理器对于这个尺寸来说非常快，其性能水平与英特尔第12代和AMD Zen 3+代的许多H系列CPU并驾齐驱。同时，框架设计的可修复性和端口的多功能性仍然是无与伦比的。
当涉及到可修复性和端口多样性时，Framework Laptop 13.5是同类产品中最好的，现在它比以前更快。然而，与竞争对手相比，该设计的部分内容开始感到过时。
尽管如此，一些缺点在三年后开始显现，其基本骨架和外观完全相同。竞争机型来自 惠普, 戴尔, 华硕，以及 和其他公司在相同的1000美元到2000美元的价格范围内，提供具有更丰富色彩、更快的刷新率和OLED面板的卓越显示选项。一些型号，如最近的 HP Dragonfly ProChromebook甚至提供RGB背光。这些替代品可能不那么容易维修，但它们肯定感觉更结实、更强大，特别是与框架的更脆弱的铰链相比。
如果Framework想坚持目前这种设计以保持可维修性并降低成本，那么他们应该开始提供更多的零件供最终用户定制。光面/哑光OLED显示面板、RGB键盘和颜色、DDR5内存而不是DDR4，以及更高分辨率的网络摄像头可以帮助Laptop 13.5跟上竞争对手。每年一次的CPU更新很好，但停滞不前的显示屏和机箱功能有可能变得陈旧。
价格和可用性
2023框架笔记本电脑13.5是，现在可以直接从制造商处订购。从1050美元起，基本的酷睿i5-1340P、8GB内存和256GB固态硬盘配置可直接从制造商处订购，而我们的酷睿i7、32GB内存和1TB配置则为2070美元。
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel
- 05/10/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
