Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023入门评测。基础机型,削减了M2 Pro,固态硬盘降级,耗电量略高
此前,我们曾对新的 2023年MacBook Pro 14具备完整的 M2 Pro芯片(12个CPU核心,19个GPU核心),32GB内存和2TB SSD。接近4,000欧元的价格证明这是一个昂贵的配置。
今天,我们来看看基本型号的MacBook Pro 14,配备了一个缩小的M2 Pro。 削减的M2 ProSoC(10个CPU内核,16个GPU内核),16GB内存和512GB SSD。与2021年的型号相比,基本型号的要价有所提高。官方称,新的MacBook Pro 14的起价为2399欧元,与2021年的版本相比,贵了150欧元。2021年的变体当时的价格。在美国,基本型号2023年的MacBook Pro 14在Apple 网站上的价格是1,999美元。
在这篇评论中,我们主要关注CPU、GPU和SSD的性能,同时看一下它们对排放的影响。机箱、连接、输入设备和显示器与2023年的MacBook Pro 14相同。关于这些方面的更多信息可以在下面的链接中找到。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
93.4 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry M2 Pro 10-Core, M2 Pro 16-Core GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" | 3024x1964 | |
92 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" | 2560x1664 | |
93.9 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro M2 Pro, M2 Pro 19-Core GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" | 3024x1964 | |
92.7 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" | 3024x1964 | |
87.7 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 18 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
88.8 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.3 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 19 mm | 14.40" | 2400x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
性能。拥有10个核心的M2 Pro
基本的2023年MacBook Pro 14依靠的是经过强化的M2 Pro SoC,有10个内核(6倍性能内核+4倍效率内核),而GPU只使用16个内核。16GB内存是基本型号的标准配置,但在配置时可以选择升级到32GB。
处理器
M2 Pro继续使用与M1 Pro相同的5纳米架构,但增加了两个额外的效率核心。M2 Pro的基本型号只提供六个性能核心,而M2 Pro和M2 Max的高端型号则有八个性能核心。
效率核心最高可达2.4GHz,而性能核心在单核时可达到3.5GHz,多核时可达到3.26GHz。请查看我们专门的M2 Pro SoC 页面,了解更多信息和基准测试。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
在我们的Cinebench R15多核循环测试中,CPU的性能保持不变,即使在电池供电的情况下也没有任何性能下降(只有在3%的电池下我们才看到任何性能限制)。与基本的M1 Pro相比,在原生Cinebench R23测试中,单核性能似乎增加了23%。这与高端的M2 Pro和M2 Max芯片处于同一水平。
与M1 Pro的作品相比,M2 Pro作品的多核性能在Cinebench R23中快了约23%。另一方面,配备12核CPU的M2 Pro比基本的M2 Pro快25%。多核分数与英特尔猛禽湖酷睿i7相比或多或少是相同的。 英特尔猛禽湖酷睿i7-1360P即使在Apple 芯片的消耗较低。
然而,英特尔在这里有一个单核的优势,同时也需要更高的功率。
AMD Zen 3 CPU,如Ryzen 7 6800U ,在单核测试中处于劣势,但在多核测试中几乎与M2 Pro入门级打平。我们将在未来几周对采用4纳米Zen 4芯片的笔记本电脑进行测试。
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Blender: v3.3 Classroom CPU
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 Pro 10-Core () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 Pro 10-Core () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 Pro 10-Core () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 Pro 10-Core () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 Pro 10-Core () | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 Pro 10-Core () | |
Average of class Multimedia (167 - 946, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
说到效率,M2 Pro入门版在单核和多核测量中都落后于速度更快的M2 Pro,也落后于MacBook Air的普通M2 SoC。
英特尔在Raptor Lake上的效率无法与M2 Pro相比,但AMD Ryzen 7 6800U在多核效率测试中只是略微落后于M2 Pro。
Power Consumption | |
Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
系统性能
主观上,基础的2023年MacBook Pro 14在整体系统性能上似乎与更高级的MacBook Pro 14和MacBook Pro 16机型相似。虽然原生应用程序确实运行得更好,但在测试过程中,我们没有遇到仿真应用程序的任何问题。
这一点在Photoshop和Premiere Pro等Adobe应用程序中得到了最好的说明。这里显示的PugetBench结果是通过这些应用程序的模拟X86版本获得的,并不反映实际性能。在跨平台的CrossMark测试中,结果非常好。
Premiere Pro PugetBench: Overall Score 0.9
Photoshop PugetBench: Overall Score
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test: 12:1 8K Metal | 12:1 8K CPU
Jetstream 2: Total Score
Speedometer 2.0: Result
WebXPRT 4: Overall
WebXPRT 3: Overall
CrossMark / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU () | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU () | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU () | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU () | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry |
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Overall Score 0.9 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Average of class Multimedia (686 - 1118, n=4, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti |
Photoshop PugetBench / Overall Score | |
Average of class Multimedia (947 - 1442, n=11, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU () | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry |
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K Metal | |
Average of class Multimedia (67 - 379, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K CPU | |
Average of class Multimedia (32 - 91, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU () | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry |
Jetstream 2 / Total Score | |
Average of class Multimedia (150.6 - 376, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti |
Speedometer 2.0 / Result | |
Average of class Multimedia (169 - 820, n=45, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU () | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=79, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU () | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti |
存储设备
我们现在来到有争议的MacBook SSD性能问题。Apple ,在新的MacBook Air入口处安装了更大的SSD,这导致其性能比旧型号更慢。这是因为macOS可以在内存满时将数据卸载到固态硬盘上,这对整体性能会产生负面影响。
在新的2023年MacBook Pro 14中,只使用了一个512GB的SSD芯片。坏消息是,其性能明显不如2021年的MacBook Pro 14和目前采用1TB存储的机型。很明显,PCIe Gen 4的速度在这里没有得到充分的利用。
尽管如此,积极的方面是,整体性能仍然比 M2 MacBook Air入门配备256GB固态硬盘。当然,人们可以争辩说,专业机型应该有更快的存储,而且考虑到增加的MSRP,Apple ,完全可以提供一个1TB驱动器作为标准配置。然而,在实践中,512GB应该仍然是相当足够的,而且比M2 MacBook Air的1TB闪存更快。 M2 MacBook Air.
更多的SSD基准测试可以在这里找到Laptop harddisks (HDD, SSD) benchmarks 。
GPU性能
的GPU。 基础版M2 Pro的GPU现在具有16个而不是14个核心,最大时钟为1.4GHz。这使M2 Pro的入门级GPU比M1 Pro的16核GPU领先约7%。 16核GPU的M1 Pro.装备19核心的 配备19核GPU的M2 Pro的速度约为12-17%,具体取决于测试。
在3DMark WildLife中,它在Apple 硅片上原生运行,即使是 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU中的 微软Surface Laptop Studio和 Schenker Vision 14都被入门级的M2 Pro GPU打败了。英特尔和AMD的集成GPU则处于明显的劣势。
入门级M2 Pro的图形性能在长时间的负载和电池供电的情况下都保持完全稳定。
更多的GPU基准测试和性能比较可在这里移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 。
Geekbench 6.0 | |
GPU Metal | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
GPU OpenCL 6.0 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Average of class Multimedia (17.8 - 132, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
Average of class Multimedia (308 - 683, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (19 - 105, n=45, last 2 years) |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (32 - 181, n=47, last 2 years) |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU () | |
Average of class Multimedia (167 - 946, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
我们可以用TheWitcher 3 (通过CrossOver运行)测试入门M2 Pro的电源效率,并与Windows笔记本电脑进行比较。然而,游戏中的Ultra设置只在MacBook Pro上禁用SSAO和Nvidia Hairworks的情况下运行(在Windows中,我们在Ultra中同时启用HBAO和Hairworks)。
因此,这些结果并不完全是一个苹果对苹果(双关语)的比较,但它们仍然提供了一个关于新SoC立场的想法。入门的M2 Pro GPU领先于其来自Nvidia和AMD的竞争对手。猛禽湖移动中过时的Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 ,被甩得更远。
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Efficiency (external Monitor) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 76 | 73 | 46 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 51 | 45 | |||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 159 | 72 | 65 | 57 | 36 |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 258 | 75 | 48 | 36 | 22 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 80.8 | 52 | 38 | 28.9 |
排放。CPU负载决定了风扇噪音
系统噪音
基础型2023年的MacBook Pro 14的风扇行为与全配置的M2 Pro略有不同。基本型号在日常使用中非常安静,风扇在大多数情况下一般听不到。在纯粹的GPU负载下也是如此,几分钟后风扇启动,但几乎听不到,声压级(SPL)刚刚超过24 dB(A)。
在CPU满负荷的情况下,风扇的噪音确实有所增加。然而,由于非常保守的风扇曲线,风扇噪音声压级短暂地增加到47.5 dB(A),以使芯片温度得到控制,然后在36-38 dB(A)左右趋于平稳。这也适用于综合负载的情况,在这种情况下,CPU的压力会更大。
也就是说,当GPU承受更高的负载时(例如,在我们的Cinebench R23多核和3DMark WildLife极端压力测试的综合负载中),我们没有看到这种峰值噪音,SPL从一开始就保持在36-38 dB(A)左右。
我们听不到任何其他随机的电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.6 / 23.6 / 23.6 dB(A) |
Load |
| 24.2 / 47.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.6 dB(A) |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -0% | -7% | -18% | -18% | -9% | ||
off / environment * | 23.6 | 23.9 -1% | 24.8 -5% | 24.6 -4% | 24.4 -3% | 24.7 -5% | |
Idle Minimum * | 23.6 | 23.9 -1% | 24.8 -5% | 24.6 -4% | 24.4 -3% | 24.7 -5% | |
Idle Average * | 23.6 | 23.9 -1% | 24.8 -5% | 24.6 -4% | 24.4 -3% | 24.7 -5% | |
Idle Maximum * | 23.6 | 23.9 -1% | 24.8 -5% | 24.6 -4% | 27.8 -18% | 24.7 -5% | |
Load Average * | 24.2 | 26 -7% | 27.8 -15% | 45.1 -86% | 43.3 -79% | 33.2 -37% | |
Load Maximum * | 47.5 | 43.2 9% | 49.5 -4% | 50.4 -6% | 48.8 -3% | 46.7 2% | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 27.8 | 49.1 | 48.2 | 44.5 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
保守的风扇行为反映在表面温度上。键盘区域变得很不舒服,特别是在玩游戏的时候,温度超过45℃。我们还记录了笔记本背面中央区域附近的类似温度,这对于在这种负载下将设备放在腿上来说并不是一个好兆头。也就是说,金属机壳在日常使用中几乎不发热,也不构成这种限制。
压力测试中的行为似乎有点奇怪,因为基本型号似乎比完整的M2 Pro消耗的功率略多。基本型M2 Pro的CPU和GPU分别消耗10W和25W,而我们相应地注意到全芯片的消耗量为8W和25W。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.2 °C / 93.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.4 °C / -9.8 F).
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -7% | 2% | -4% | -21% | -24% | 2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 47 | 44.7 5% | 46.9 -0% | 46.8 -0% | 48 -2% | 48.4 -3% | 42.3 10% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42.8 | 44.6 -4% | 41.7 3% | 40.9 4% | 50.2 -17% | 57.1 -33% | 38.2 11% |
Idle Upper Side * | 22.3 | 25.1 -13% | 21.4 4% | 24.2 -9% | 27.7 -24% | 28.1 -26% | 23.4 -5% |
Idle Bottom * | 21.7 | 25.3 -17% | 21.4 1% | 24.2 -12% | 30.1 -39% | 29 -34% | 23.5 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
电源管理。基础版M2 Pro,功耗略高
消耗功率
我们的2023 MacBook Pro 14设备与配备全M2 Pro芯片的变体相比,空转时的耗电量似乎略高。这是否是一个普遍的趋势,或者仅仅是我们设备的问题,目前还无法判断。
功率消耗会随着HDR内容的增加而增加,我们能够测量到25-26W的最大功率。然而,在负载下,基本型号更经济一些,但在压力测试的开始阶段就会遇到电源限制。我们无法测量到更大的电源的功耗增加--基本型MacBook Pro 14在几秒钟后就稳定在66W。待机和关机时的耗电量非常低。
所提供的电源刚好够用,而且不能够在负载下为电池正常充电。如果你打算用MacBook Pro 14完成高要求的任务,你应该买一个更高瓦数的电源。
Off / Standby | 0.12 / 0.26 Watt |
Idle | 2.5 / 12.1 / 12.3 Watt |
Load |
49.8 / 71.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry M2 Pro 10-Core, M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro M2 Pro, M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.4" | Average Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 31% | -10% | -5% | -62% | -67% | -16% | 0% | -54% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.5 | 1.9 24% | 2.4 4% | 2.9 -16% | 7.1 -184% | 7.5 -200% | 2.6 -4% | 2.5 ? -0% | 6.63 ? -165% |
Idle Average * | 12.1 | 9.6 21% | 11.3 7% | 11.6 4% | 10.8 11% | 10.4 14% | 7.1 41% | 12.1 ? -0% | 11.2 ? 7% |
Idle Maximum * | 12.3 | 9.7 21% | 11.5 7% | 11.9 3% | 11.6 6% | 11.4 7% | 7.9 36% | 12.3 ? -0% | 13.3 ? -8% |
Load Average * | 49.8 | 32.4 35% | 59.6 -20% | 49.5 1% | 84.8 -70% | 83.3 -67% | 76.8 -54% | 49.8 ? -0% | 70.7 ? -42% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.6 | 30.8 34% | 55.9 -20% | 58.2 -25% | 91.3 -96% | 92.7 -99% | 83 -78% | ||
Load Maximum * | 71.4 | 35.7 50% | 100 -40% | 68.5 4% | 100.8 -41% | 110.3 -54% | 97.3 -36% | 71.4 ? -0% | 116.6 ? -63% |
* ... smaller is better
Energieaufnahme Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Energieaufnahme mit externem Monitor
电池寿命
在我们的电池测试中,稍高的闲置功耗的影响也是明显的。在视频循环测试中,结果仍然相当不错,大约为16.5小时,在150cd/m2的条件下浏览网页时,接近13小时。
在500cd/m2的全SDR亮度下,网络浏览时的电池寿命下降到仅为7小时。
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry M2 Pro 10-Core, M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, 70 Wh | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro M2 Pro, M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, 70 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, 69.9 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 58 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 5% | -2% | -2% | -45% | -27% | -32% | -16% | |
H.264 | 982 | 946 -4% | 917 -7% | 900 -8% | 532 -46% | 666 -32% | 739 -25% | 847 ? -14% |
WiFi v1.3 | 774 | 884 14% | 807 4% | 816 5% | 434 -44% | 607 -22% | 480 -38% | 640 ? -17% |
Load | 70 | 69 | 92 | 124 | 60 | 97.1 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论:可以推荐MacBook Pro 14的基本版本
在经历了所有的坏消息后,关于 的SSD性能的固态硬盘性能,以及在首次报道MacBook Pro 14的磁盘速度降低之后,我们很想看看2023年MacBook Pro 14的基本变体会如何表现。我们的测试结果令人惊讶,因为所提供的512GB固态硬盘比2021年的MacBook Pro 14慢,但仍比大多数PCIe第三代固态硬盘和当前MacBook Air中的1TB固态硬盘好。 目前的MacBook Air中的1TB SSD。.
当然,对于较高的要价,我们希望1TB固态硬盘成为标准配置,但Apple ,可能不想放弃固态硬盘升级的利润。话虽如此,街头价格似乎在发布后不久就下降了,现在你可以以比建议零售价(RRP)低约300欧元的价格买到新的MacBook Pro 14。
尽管采用了削减版的M2 Pro SoC,2023年MacBook Pro 14入门版的CPU和GPU性能仍然高于采用完整M1 Pro的2021 MacBook Pro 16 。因此,新的MacBook Pro 14仍然是一个体面的升级,即使所谓的效率飞跃没有完全实现。CPU性能的提高也伴随着功耗的增加,但尽管如此,这些数值仍然非常好。
2023年的MacBook Pro 14的基本型号有一个较慢的固态硬盘,但这在日常使用中并不重要。相反,你可以期待更快的M2 Pro SoC和Wi-Fi 6E。优秀的迷你LED显示屏、良好的板载扬声器和高系统性能没有改变,使基础版MacBook Pro 14成为优秀的整体包装。
MacBook Pro 14的一般积极方面,包括出色的迷你LED屏幕、优秀的扬声器和日常使用中的低风扇噪音,也适用于基本型。几乎没有批评意见,入门级MacBook Pro 14提供了一个优秀的整体包装。本地应用程序运行得非常好,包括复杂的应用程序,如Photoshop和Premiere Pro。如果你不一定束缚或依赖Windows专属的应用程序,你肯定应该仔细看看2023年的基础版MacBook Pro 14。
如果你已经拥有2021年的MacBook Pro 14,升级到2023年版本可能真的不值得。然而,如果你来自一个基于英特尔的老式MacBook,可以毫不犹豫地考虑较新的Apple 硅MacBook Pro。
考虑到游戏作品的数量庞大,带有专用GPU的Windows笔记本电脑更适合游戏,但也要做出一些妥协。例如,,微软Surface Laptop Studio ,配备了慢得多的CPU,而Schenker Vision 14 ,在视觉质量方面根本无法与MacBook Pro的迷你LED面板相比。
也就是说,Schenker Vision 14因其重量较轻而更便于携带,并为内存和固态硬盘提供了良好的维护和升级选择,这在MacBook Pro 14中是根本不可能的。
价格和可用性
2023年MacBook Pro 14的基本型号的建议零售价为2399欧元,但街头价格已大幅下降。我们的测试配置可在 Amazon.de少了300欧元,即2,099欧元。带有更快的M2 Pro和1TB SSD的升级版配置是 可以以2,660欧元(RRP 2,999欧元)。
经测试,2023年的MacBook Pro 14条目也可在美国亚马逊 ,售价为1,948.94美元。
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
- 03/09/2023 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.