宏碁发布了一款配备 RTX 2050的笔记本电脑。新款 Aspire 16 自 4 月中旬上市以来,由于其规格并不起眼,直到现在才被我们发现。不过,今天我们要看看这款多媒体笔记本到底有什么能耐。
Aspire 16 配备了 英特尔酷睿 7 150U.尽管这款处理器相当新,但却没有受到太多关注,因为它没有配备任何用于人工智能加速的神经处理单元(NPU)。到目前为止,我们也只评测过一款配备该处理器的笔记本电脑,即 联想 IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9.因此,我们还将把 Aspire 16 与各种笔记本电脑进行比较,如 HP ProBook 450 G10、较旧的 联想 ThinkBook 16 G4+和新款 小米红米笔记本 Pro 16.此外,还有 宏碁 Aspire 5 A515(15.6 英寸,2023 年)也列入了我们的性能图表,以帮助我们分析自那时以来的改进之处。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79.1 % | v8 | 10 / 2024 | Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.9 kg | 21 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
74.7 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.8 kg | 16.9 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
86.2 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | HP ProBook 450 G10 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.8 kg | 19.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.8 kg | 16.5 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.9 kg | 15.9 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击https://www.notebookcheck.net/Our-new-rating-system-v8-explained-Lower-but-more-realistic-scores-together-with-sustainability-assessment.853123.0.html.
外壳和规格 - Thunderbolt 4,无 SD 读卡器
16 英寸 Aspire 从宏碁 Vero 系列中学到了一些东西,包括使用 30% 的消费后回收(PCR)材料制成的底盖。总体而言,Vero、Aspire 5 和 Aspire 16 的机身设计也颇为相似。Vero 的配色更为活泼,而 Aspire 16 的深灰色则显得更为低调。此外,在 Aspire 16 上,边框顶部的中间部分略微加厚,以方便单手打开笔记本电脑。
利用中间略微凸起的卡扣,还可以单手将显示屏盖板折回 140 度。铰链的硬度足以确保屏幕不会晃动。虽然盖子使用了铝材,但键盘面板和底盖是塑料制成的。底座部分在扭动时会发出嘎吱声。对底座施加压力也会导致轻微的弯曲,但在打字时并不明显。机身也没有明显的缝隙;笔记本电脑的整体制造质量尚可。
尽管价格相当适中,但宏碁笔记本电脑拥有一个 Thunderbolt 4 端口,但总共只提供三个 USB 端口,其中两个是 USB-A。机上没有 SD 读卡器。电源插头非常薄,很容易滑出。所有的外部接口都分布在左右两侧;背面仅为空气冷却系统预留,但排气口仅位于右端。
底盖由十颗相同长度的十字头螺钉固定,无需任何工具即可掀起。取下面板后,可以看到两个 NVMe SSD 插槽、一个 Wi-Fi 模块、一块电池、一个内存插槽和两个风扇(从上方看)。
可持续性
与 Vero 系列产品一样,宏碁在总体上更加强调使用再生塑料和可持续发展。例如,该产品的包装主要由不含塑料的硬纸板组成,屏幕保护布完全由可回收塑料制成。只有电源适配器采用塑料薄膜包装。
与 Vero 系列类似,笔记本电脑本身的底座部分也是由 30% 的可回收塑料制成。
输入设备 - 难以辨认的标记
由于采用了 16 英寸的外形尺寸,键盘面板足够大,可以放进一个数字键盘,不过这个部分感觉有点拥挤。Aspire 16 上的一些按键特别小,比如功能键和半高的上下方向键。
键帽字体更不讨人喜欢,看起来又细又小,在对比度方面也很难从按键中脱颖而出。在光线充足的情况下,很难辨认出键帽上的标记。在光线不理想的情况下,你只能大致判断出在某一特定时刻按下的是哪个键。幸运的是,在这种情况下,有两个亮度级别的单色背光可以提供帮助。
按键键程较短,反馈效果不错,但对于我们的口味来说,键程稍浅。打字声音也相当合理。
触摸板大小适中,尺寸约为 12.6 x 8.3 厘米(5.0 x 3.3 英寸),表面非常光滑。集成的鼠标按键提供了很好的反馈,操作时声音也不大。左上角有一个指纹识别器。
显示屏 - 325 尼特,无全 sRGB 覆盖范围
宏碁为 Aspire 16 配备了一块来自奇美的哑光 16 英寸 16:10 IPS 面板,分辨率为 1200p。遗憾的是,该屏幕的刷新率仅为 60Hz。
我们的测量结果显示,该屏幕的峰值亮度约为 324 尼特,亮度分布相当均匀,达到 86%,不过我们也注意到了相当严重的背光出血现象,尤其是在左上角。与同类产品的面板一样,该机的响应时间也相当慢。但至少显示屏没有使用 PWM。
屏幕的对比度超过 1,300:1,黑度达到 0.27,令人印象深刻。
Aspire 16 的色彩覆盖率较低,只能再现 64% 的 sRGB 色域。对于办公笔记本电脑来说,这样的性能水平已经足够了,但对于多媒体笔记本电脑来说,这还远远不够。
根据我们的主观印象,我们对显示屏也不太满意。虽然亮度足够,但屏幕上的图像看起来并不特别漂亮。
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 352 cd/m²
Contrast: 1304:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.41 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.52
ΔE Greyscale 3.32 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
43.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 N160JCA-EEK (Chi Mei CMN163D), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | HP ProBook 450 G10 LG Philips LP156WFC-SPMD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 LP156WFH-SPD5, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP LEN160WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 60 Hz | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 TL160MDMP03_0, IPS, 3072x1920, 16", 165 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -3% | -9% | -10% | 61% | 99% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 42.3 | 41.5 -2% | 38.4 -9% | 38.11 -10% | 69.6 65% | 98.8 134% |
sRGB Coverage | 63.6 | 61.2 -4% | 57.3 -10% | 57.7 -9% | 97.5 53% | 100 57% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.7 | 42.9 -2% | 39.7 -9% | 39.41 -10% | 71.7 64% | 89.9 106% |
Response Times | 33% | -9% | -10% | 10% | 5% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 31.4 ? | 20.7 ? 34% | 35.5 ? -13% | 33.6 ? -7% | 32.7 ? -4% | 39.2 ? -25% |
Response Time Black / White * | 22 ? | 15.1 ? 31% | 23 ? -5% | 24.8 ? -13% | 16.8 ? 24% | 14.6 ? 34% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | -35% | -21% | -25% | 25% | 25% | |
Brightness middle | 352 | 313.3 -11% | 285 -19% | 257.4 -27% | 371 5% | 520 48% |
Brightness | 324 | 308 -5% | 266 -18% | 248 -23% | 357 10% | 510 57% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 88 2% | 88 2% | 91 6% | 93 8% |
Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.37 -37% | 0.26 4% | 0.3209 -19% | 0.23 15% | 0.35 -30% |
Contrast | 1304 | 847 -35% | 1096 -16% | 802 -38% | 1613 24% | 1486 14% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.41 | 8.42 -91% | 6.3 -43% | 6.26 -42% | 2.6 41% | 2.9 34% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.04 | 19.09 -27% | 18.3 -22% | 18.28 -22% | 4.4 71% | 6.2 59% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.52 | 2.16 39% | 5.2 -48% | 4.99 -42% | 1.3 63% | 1.1 69% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.32 | 8.3 -150% | 4.3 -30% | 3.7 -11% | 3.7 -11% | 4.3 -30% |
Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.83 78% | 2.32 95% | 2.186 101% | 2.32 95% | 2.19 100% |
CCT | 7122 91% | 6296 103% | 6374 102% | 6606 98% | 7271 89% | 7422 88% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-18% | -13% /
-17% | -15% /
-19% | 32% /
30% | 43% /
38% |
* ... smaller is better
面板开箱后未经校准,灰度和色彩的准确度都很低。使用 Calman 软件和 X-Rite 测量仪器对显示器进行手动校准后,我们成功地大幅降低了 Delta E 值,平均差异从 3.3 降至 0.4。不过,色彩方面的改善并不明显。即使在手动校准后,平均色差仍在 3 以上。还有一些异常值,例如蓝色的 Delta E 值为 14。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.6 ms rise | |
↘ 9.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
31.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms rise | |
↘ 16.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
该显示屏的峰值亮度超过 300 尼特,在室外阴凉处使用绝对足够明亮。亚光表面还能减少大部分反光。尽管如此,我们还是建议正面观看屏幕,因为面板的可视角度并不出众。
性能 - 3D 性能卓越,多核性能乏善可陈
配备 英特尔酷睿 7 150U, a GeForce RTX 2050Aspire 16 配备了英特尔酷睿 7 150U、16GB 内存和 1TB 固态硬盘,有望成为一款全能型多媒体笔记本电脑,从纸面上看,它还可以处理一些轻度图像和视频编辑工作,以及运行要求不高的游戏。不过,在内容创作方面,这款笔记本电脑受到了显示屏的制约,因为它的显示屏没有完全覆盖 sRGB。
测试条件
AcerSense 是 Aspire 16 的第一方控制中心应用程序。我们为基准测试启用了最佳性能模式,为电池寿命测试启用了平衡模式和电源效率模式。由于 AcerSense 中的设置似乎不会影响 Windows 中的性能模式,因此我们对它们进行了并行调整。
宏碁 Aspire 16 预装了多达十个第一方应用程序,包括三个 AcerSense 程序以及其他 "管理器 "工具和类似软件。此外,任务栏上还集成了一个指向 Booking.com 的快速链接,不过可以很容易地将其移除。不幸的是,所有这些都意味着用户偶尔会看到明目张胆的广告,如 Google Play Games 或其他 "宏碁独家 "促销活动的广告。
处理器
英特尔 英特尔酷睿 7 150U是一款基于 Raptor Lake-U Refresh 系列的高能效高端笔记本 CPU,自 2024 年 1 月起采用 Alder Lake 架构。尽管是当前一代的芯片,但它没有任何用于本地 AI 应用的 NPU。CPU 包含 2 个 P 核和 8 个 E 核,主频从 1.8 GHz 到 5.4 GHz 不等,可同时处理 12 个线程。U 系列芯片的功耗通常仅为 15 瓦,在 Turbo 模式下可提升至 55 瓦。
我们在 Cinebench R15 循环测试中证实了这一点。TDP 开始时徘徊在 55 瓦左右,但仅限于第一次运行。随后,CPU 会短暂地以 50 瓦的功率运行,然后在剩余时间内降至 25 瓦左右。尽管如此,结果仍然相当稳定,只是随着时间的推移略有下降。酷睿 7 150U 在所有 CPU 基准测试中的表现均符合预期。值得注意的是,该处理器的单核性能非常出色,但多核性能相对较弱。
电池供电时的 TDP 约为 22 瓦,与笔记本电脑插电时相比,性能下降了约 27%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP -2! | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 -2! | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (7226 - 9895, n=4) | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (1698 - 2032, n=4) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (2821 - 3790, n=4) | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (652 - 782, n=4) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (1040 - 1609, n=4) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (243 - 290, n=4) | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (344 - 451, n=4) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (31447 - 39286, n=4) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (5407 - 6261, n=4) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 22544, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (7737 - 10160, n=4) |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (2253 - 2781, n=4) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (7178 - 8354, n=4) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (1631 - 1969, n=4) | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (8.57 - 11.1, n=4) | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (29 - 69.2, n=4) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (0.4386 - 0.502, n=4) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (6306 - 7909, n=4) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (32582 - 41382, n=4) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (1656 - 2165, n=4) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (58025 - 70820, n=4) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (4387 - 5293, n=4) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (16042 - 20259, n=4) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (33007 - 41731, n=4) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (491 - 695, n=4) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (3417 - 4243, n=4) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (21802 - 38866, n=4) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
系统性能
Aspire 16 在 PCMark 10 中表现出色,仅比红米本稍逊一筹。不过,根据我们的经验,该系统只能在大部分时间流畅运行,偶尔会出现卡顿,原因不明。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (5940 - 6704, n=2) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (9705 - 11094, n=2) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (8292 - 9407, n=2) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (7067 - 7837, n=2) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (257 - 305, n=2) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=88, last 2 years) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (463 - 554, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6704 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (36579 - 61190, n=4) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (39827 - 68780, n=4) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (44925 - 78327, n=4) | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (74.5 - 100, n=4) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
LatencyMon 在启动后立即检测到了延迟问题,当我们打开一个浏览器和多个标签页时,延迟问题更加严重。该设备也未能完美播放 4K/60fps 的 YouTube 视频,在播放过程中掉了两帧,但至少延迟没有进一步增加。总的来说,测试结果令人失望,因为延迟值过高。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
这款笔记本电脑采用 1TB Western Digital NVMe 固态硬盘作为存储设备。尽管它目前在我们的SSD 排名中占据第 12 位,但我们更倾向于将其归类为中端硬盘。.在我们的测试过程中,这款存储硬盘的传输速率很高,但在循环运行 DiskSpd 时却无法保持这种性能:在第 11 次运行后,由于热节流,其性能下降了约 34%。
* ... smaller is better
Sustained load Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
尽管发布时间是 2022 年,但 GeForce RTX 2050仍然是入门级多媒体笔记本电脑中相当受欢迎的专用 GPU,因为它的性能甚至比最新的 iGPU 都要好得多。
在 3DMark 基准测试中,笔记本电脑的 GPU 整体性能比我们数据库中的 RTX 2050 平均性能高出 11%。只有联想 ThinkBook 16 G4+的速度要快一些。不过,新款 Aspire 16 几乎没有比去年的 Aspire 5 快,只提高了 3%。当笔记本使用电池供电时,Fire Strike 分数下降了约 21%。
在 30 分钟的《赛博朋克 2077》节流测试中,Aspire 16 的帧速率非常稳定,没有出现任何性能损失。总的来说,这款笔记本电脑展示了超强的游戏性能,在我们的对比中仅次于 ThinkBook 16。虽然你可能不想在 Aspire 16 上以最高设置玩《赛博朋克 2077》,但全高清和中等设置是绝对可以做到的。这款笔记本的性能也足以胜任视频编辑等任务。
3DMark 11 Performance | 13144 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 26385 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8588 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3785 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP -2! | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 -1! | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 -2! | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 -1! | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8.26 - 80.7, n=50, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Average of class Multimedia (9.1 - 117.7, n=38, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 179.9, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 153.3 | 153.3 | 97.1 | 50.3 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 159.1 | 134.8 | 120.1 | 110.6 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 101.3 | 55.3 | 39.3 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 104 | 88.7 | 75.5 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 197.9 | 87.6 | 72.1 | 62.8 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 55.5 | 43.7 | 37.8 | 37 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 47.8 | 36.4 | 29.2 | 24.7 |
排放和功耗 - 风扇仅安装在一侧
噪音排放
在平衡和静音模式下,风扇在空闲时通常不会转动。在 "性能 "模式下,即使在空闲状态,风扇也会产生约 31 分贝的噪音。
在重负载情况下,例如在我们的压力测试或游戏过程中,风扇的噪音可能会高达约 50 分贝,这意味着 Aspire 16 的运行噪音比大多数直接竞争对手略高。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 31 dB(A) |
Load |
| 46.57 / 50 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U | HP ProBook 450 G10 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1355U, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1355U, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 10% | 9% | 2% | 2% | 9% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 23 -0% | 23.5 -2% | 25.04 -9% | 24.2 -5% | 24.4 -6% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 23 -0% | 23.5 -2% | 26.3 -14% | 24.2 -5% | 24.4 -6% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 23 -0% | 23.5 -2% | 26.3 -14% | 24.2 -5% | 24.4 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 31 | 23 26% | 23.5 24% | 26.3 15% | 24.2 22% | 24.4 21% |
Load Average * | 46.57 | 43.3 7% | 38 18% | 32.5 30% | 47 -1% | 32 31% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 50 | 40.8 18% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 50 | 40.9 18% | 41.4 17% | 49 2% | 47 6% | 39.7 21% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.2 | 46.7 | 47 | 30.6 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在 Aspire 16 英寸机箱内部,两个风扇紧靠在右侧。向后的排气口也同样只位于右侧。机箱左侧设计有铜质热导管,用于将热量从左侧传出,但效果有限。我们的温度测量结果表明,左侧的温度要比右侧高得多,而右侧基本上能保持低温。我们的热图像也证实了这一点。
因此,在我们比较的设备中,Aspire 16 的热点温度最高。因此,下一代 Aspire 16 可以采用对称散热设计,帮助更均匀地散热。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.2 °C / -4 F).
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP ProBook 450 G10 Intel Core i7-1355U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 Intel Core i7-1355U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 17% | 13% | 18% | 10% | 13% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 47 | 35.4 25% | 39.9 15% | 35.7 24% | 42.9 9% | 40.3 14% |
Maximum Bottom * | 50 | 33 34% | 43 14% | 36.8 26% | 50.6 -1% | 45.9 8% |
Idle Upper Side * | 31 | 30.2 3% | 26.4 15% | 27.9 10% | 26 16% | 26.3 15% |
Idle Bottom * | 32 | 30.2 6% | 29 9% | 27.9 13% | 26.5 17% | 27.9 13% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Aspire 的两个向下发射立体声扬声器分别位于左右两侧的前部,声音并不特别响亮。它们的高音尤其是低音确实需要改进,但至少它们的中音听起来很平衡。
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
这款相当小巧的充电器额定功率为 90 瓦。在我们的压力测试中,笔记本电脑的耗电量达到了这个水平,但只是短暂的,平均耗电量为 83 瓦。因此,充电器的功率对笔记本电脑来说应该足够了。闲置时的耗电量从 8 瓦到 14 瓦不等,具体取决于电源模式。
Off / Standby | 1.5 / 0.5 Watt |
Idle | 8.8 / 12.8 / 14.1 Watt |
Load |
80 / 90.53 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
Power consumption with external monitorMonitor
电池寿命
宏碁为这款笔记本电脑配备了 48.5 Wh 的电池,但许多竞争设备的电池容量都稍大一些。尽管如此,Aspire 16 的电池续航时间仍然相当不错,在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试(屏幕亮度降低到 150 尼特)中可持续使用长达 10 小时,在视频测试中可持续使用超过 8 小时。
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 48.5 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | HP ProBook 450 G10 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 51.3 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 71 Wh | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -2% | 20% | -14% | 1% | 73% | 14% | |
H.264 | 498 | 685 38% | 397 -20% | 757 52% | 1308 163% | 821 ? 65% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 607 | 761 25% | 559 -8% | 522 -14% | 489 -19% | 983 62% | 625 ? 3% |
Load | 130 | 94 -28% | 170 31% | 118 -9% | 90 -31% | 124 -5% | 97.8 ? -25% |
Reader / Idle | 1568 | 1083 | 1168 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 性能良好,不过显示屏...
Aspire 16 配备的高性能 RTX 2050 显卡证明了该显卡的存在价值,甚至比最新的集成 GPU 更胜一筹。如果你不需要人工智能的承诺,酷睿 7 150U 是当前一代的处理器,在保持高效的同时还能提供令人印象深刻的单核性能。笔记本电脑的另一个亮点是配备了最先进的 Thunderbolt 4 接口。
遗憾的是,良好的性能并没有体现在显示屏上。缺乏完整的 sRGB 覆盖范围不符合多媒体笔记本电脑的要求。宏碁还应该为 Aspire 16 的未来迭代优化相当片面的散热系统。
Aspire 16 采用了新一代 CPU 和老式 GPU(尽管已经老化,但性能依然不俗),实际上是一款功能强大的多媒体笔记本电脑,而且不会让用户破费。不过,它受制于相对较差的 IPS 显示屏。对于 899 欧元(993 美元)的价格来说,市场上有很多比它更好的竞争对手。
那些需要更高性能的用户已经可以以低于 1000 欧元(1104 美元)的价格买到配备更强大的 RTX 4060 的游戏笔记本电脑。只要多花不到 100 欧元,放弃 3D 性能,你几乎就能买到这个价位最好的多媒体笔记本电脑,即 小米红米笔记本 Pro 16它拥有更好的屏幕和更流畅的用户体验。
价格和供应情况
对于德国的读者,Aspire 16 的规格可在Notebooksbilliger 等在线零售商处购买。有关您所在地区的供货情况,请查看当地的宏碁网站。
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息请点击此处。
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2
- 10/01/2024 v8
Christian Hintze
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.