英特尔酷睿 7 150U 性能首次亮相:联想 IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 笔记本电脑评测
IdeaPad Slim 5 系列是联想最经济实惠的笔记本电脑。这些机型低于更高端的 IdeaPad Pro 系列, IdeaPad Flex 系列和 Yoga 7 系列在功能和性能方面都不相上下。今年的 IdeaPad Slim 5 16 配备了 Raptor Lake 刷新 CPU 以及更昂贵的 Meteor Lake-U 选项。
我们的测试机是低端配置,配备 Raptor Lake Core 7 150U 和 1200p IPS 触摸屏,售价仅为 800 美元。较低端的配置为酷睿 5 120U,而最昂贵的配置为 1280p OLED 显示屏。此外,所有选件都只配备集成显卡。
该机型的流星湖酷睿 Ultra 版本以 IdeaPad Slim 5 16IMH9 命名。否则,配备 Raptor Lake CPU 的型号称为 IdeaPad Slim 7 16IRU9。
IdeaPad Slim 5 16 的竞争对手包括其他经济型 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑,如 惠普Pavilion Plus 16华硕 Vivobook S16 或 戴尔 Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1.
更多联想评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
74.7 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.8 kg | 16.9 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
87.9 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.9 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
82.1 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 2.1 kg | 18.99 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
v (old) | 10 / 2024 | Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.6 kg | 16 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | ||
85.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP R5 7530U, Vega 7 | 1.8 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 时尚而基本的设计
与惠普Pavilion 系列相比,我们的测试设备采用全金属表面处理,手感非常光滑,外观也更加整洁。表面和边缘都非常平整,没有额外的纹理、痕迹或装饰。可以说这是一种乏味的外观,但我们很欣赏联想为预算有限的目标家庭用户所做的简约设计,因为他们可能对华而不实的设计不感兴趣。
机箱的刚性不错,但并不完美。盖子和底座的弯曲和嘎吱声比我们在最近的 Yoga 7 二合一 16尤其是铰链的硬度,以减少调整角度时的晃动。即便如此,这些都不是令人担忧的主要原因,它们只是反映了该机型以预算为导向的设计。
尺寸和重量几乎与 IdeaPad Pro 5 16尽管它们的内部和外部存在各种差异。这意味着,您并不一定会因为 IdeaPad Slim 5 16 价格便宜而买到更厚或更重的笔记本电脑。
请注意,IdeaPad Slim 5 16 是用户可以选择塑料或金属材质的少数机型之一。塑料机型比金属机型略厚 1 毫米,重量略轻 30 克。为了节省成本,用户可能更倾向于选择不太奢华的塑料机型。
连接性
端口选项包括价格较高的 IdeaPad Pro 5 16但也有一些重要的例外。首先,读卡器仅支持 MicroSD 而非全尺寸 SD 卡。其次,USB-C 端口不支持 Thunderbolt,只兼容 Power Delivery 和 DisplayPort 1.4。最后,HDMI 端口的版本是 1.4,而惠普Pavilion 16 等竞争机型的版本是 2.1。IdeaPad Slim 5 16 在一些发烧级功能上的 "偷工减料 "有助于将其与联想更昂贵的机型区分开来。
SD 读卡器
集成读卡器的传输速率与我们在更昂贵的 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 上记录的传输速率大致相同。与 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1 上较慢的读卡器相比,性能最多可提高 3 倍。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M |
交流
标配的英特尔 AX203 支持 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.2 连接。为节约成本,不支持 Wi-Fi 7。与华硕 AXE11000 测试路由器配对后,传输速率稳定可靠。
网络摄像头
标配 200 万像素网络摄像头,在同类产品和同价位产品中属于中等水平。内置物理快门,但没有红外传感器,不支持面部识别。
维护
只需一把 T5 梅花螺丝刀,就能轻松拆下底部面板。需要注意的是,虽然我们的设备配备了 42 毫米 M.2 固态硬盘,但仍支持全长 80 毫米硬盘。内存是焊接的,用户无法升级。
有三种电池规格可供选择:47 Wh、57 Wh 和 76 Wh。我们的测试机配备的是 57 Wh 电池,这也解释了为什么配置 76 Wh 电池的机型左下角有未使用的空间。
可持续性
包装由可回收纸张、由 30% 海洋废弃物制成的塑料和由大于 90% 的可回收成分制成的软泡沫组成。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了交流适配器和文件外没有其他附件。如果在美国购买,制造商提供一年有限保修。
输入设备 - 浅型和软型
键盘
键入体验并不令人满意,因为按键的感觉很浅。例如,回车键和空格键通常比主要的 QWERTY 键更响亮、更有点击感,但联想的情况并非如此。按键的反馈比 惠普Pavilion Plus 16给人一种廉价的感觉。
反馈较弱的好处是打字时发出的咔哒声较小。因此,如果在较小的教室或会议室,该机型对他人的干扰较小。
触摸板
这里的点击板尺寸为 12 x 7.5 厘米,不如更昂贵的 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 上 13.5 x 8 厘米的点击板宽敞。不过,当按下键盘输入点击操作时,键盘表面的响声和 "咔嗒 "的反应速度还是让我们大吃一惊。相比之下,这个价位的大多数其他笔记本电脑(如华硕 VivoBook 系列)上的点击板往往更松软,反馈也更弱。
展示 - 大多平庸
有以下四种显示选项。我们的设备配置了黑体选项。
- 1920 x 1200,无触摸,IPS,300 尼特,哑光,60% sRGB,60 赫兹,无 HDR
- 1920 x 1200,无触摸屏,IPS,300 尼特,哑光,100% sRGB,60 赫兹,无 HDR
- 1920 x 1200,触摸屏,300 尼特,哑光,60% sRGB,60 赫兹,无 HDR
- 2048 x 1280,非触摸屏,OLED,400 尼特,亮面,100% DCI-P3,120 赫兹,HDR500
由于面板的色彩范围有限,我们建议避免第一和第三个选项。这两种面板是你可以选择的最低端面板,因为它们在 sRGB 覆盖率和刷新率方面明显不如大多数竞争对手。遗憾的是,触摸屏用户只能选择这款机型的单一面板。
好在我们的触摸屏面板的响应时间和对比度至少还算不错,足以满足休闲游戏和多媒体播放的需要。不过,如果要进行图形编辑或获得更好的多媒体体验,OLED 面板将更胜一筹。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 313.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 847:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.16
ΔE Greyscale 8.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
42.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.83
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 NE160QDM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 AU Optronics B160QAT, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 90 Hz | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx AU Optronics AUOFDA4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M SDC4178, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 54% | 106% | 73% | -2% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 41.5 | 63.3 53% | 99.4 140% | 74.6 80% | 40.4 -3% | |
sRGB Coverage | 61.2 | 95.2 56% | 100 63% | 99 62% | 59.8 -2% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.9 | 65.3 52% | 92.5 116% | 76.5 78% | 42 -2% | |
Response Times | 30% | -138% | 56% | -58% | ||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 20.7 ? | 15 ? 28% | 15.4 ? 26% | 9.06 ? 56% | 32.8 ? -58% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 15.1 ? | 10.3 ? 32% | 60.6 ? -301% | 6.7 ? 56% | 23.9 ? -58% | |
PWM Frequency | 2753.7 ? | |||||
Screen | 38% | 69% | 34% | 0% | ||
Brightness middle | 313.3 | 368 17% | 413 32% | 403 29% | 310 -1% | |
Brightness | 308 | 368 19% | 409 33% | 394 28% | 290 -6% | |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 91 0% | 97 7% | 90 -1% | 86 -5% | |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.31 16% | 0.14 62% | 0.34 8% | 0.22 41% | |
Contrast | 847 | 1187 40% | 2950 248% | 1185 40% | 1409 66% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.42 | 2.4 71% | 3.48 59% | 3.13 63% | 6.2 26% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.09 | 6.5 66% | 6.97 63% | 6.14 68% | 24.7 -29% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.16 | 0.8 63% | 1.65 24% | 5.3 -145% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.3 | 4.5 46% | 4.5 46% | 4.5 46% | 3.8 54% | |
Gamma | 2.83 78% | 2.21 100% | 2.15 102% | 2.18 101% | 2.22 99% | |
CCT | 6296 103% | 6324 103% | 6446 101% | 6261 104% | 6011 108% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 41% /
40% | 12% /
46% | 54% /
46% | -20% /
-9% |
* ... smaller is better
显示器开箱后的校准效果很差,灰度和色彩 deltaE 平均值分别高达 8.3 和 8.42。使用 X-Rite 色度计进行校准后,平均 deltaE 值分别降至 1.9 和 2.16,明显改善了这些缺陷。即便如此,由于上述有限的 sRGB 色彩,在饱和度较高的情况下,色彩仍然会变得非常不准确。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
15.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.7 ms rise | |
↘ 7.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
20.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise | |
↘ 9.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
300 尼特的亮度在目前大多数笔记本电脑中属于低端水平。在户外工作时,尤其是在阳光下工作时,可能会出现眩光和色彩失真。升级到亮度稍高的 OLED 面板也不会对观看体验有太大改善,因为其光泽覆盖只会放大眩光。
性能
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 和联想 Vantage 设置为性能模式。Vantage 软件再次进行了重新设计,增加了太多的子菜单。例如,"电源配置文件 "部分就被埋在两个子菜单下,甚至需要滚动才能看到。不过,我们还是很喜欢这些选项和可调设置。
处理器
酷睿 7 150U 核心 7 150U可视为 酷睿 i7-1365U因为两者具有相同的内核数、线程数、L1/L2/L3 高速缓存大小和底层 Raptor Lake-U 架构。甚至它们的基本时钟频率也仅相差 100 MHz,在所有方面都基本相同。
CineBench 的结果显示,酷睿 7 150U 与价格更高的 Meteor Lake 相比,差距不到 5%。 酷睿至尊 7 155U、较旧的酷睿 i7-1365U 和竞争产品 Ryzen 7 7730U和竞争对手 Ryzen 7 7730U。在单线程负载方面,它比 AMD 的替代产品更具优势。虽然与去年的酷睿 i7-1365U 相比,今年的优势令人失望,但整体性能实际上与酷睿 Ultra 7 U 系列不相上下,因此在执行传统 CPU 任务时,价格更低的酷睿 7 150U 并不慢。
相反,酷睿 7 150U 与成本更高的流星湖系列替代产品的主要区别在于没有集成 NPU,尽管这款笔记本电脑仍然配备了 Co-Pilot 键。如果你打算在不久的将来频繁使用 Co-Pilot 或其他 AI 增强型任务,那么在我们的 IdeaPad Slim 5 16 配置上,它们的运行速度可能会更慢。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (6306 - 7909, n=4) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (32582 - 41382, n=4) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (1656 - 2165, n=4) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (58025 - 70820, n=4) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (4387 - 5293, n=4) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (16042 - 20259, n=4) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (491 - 695, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (3417 - 4243, n=4) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (21802 - 38866, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力测试时,处理器的频率会飙升至 2.8 GHz,功耗为 37 W,温度为 90 C。然而,大约一分钟后,处理器频率将降至 2.2 GHz,功耗降至 22 W,以保持 70 C 的低内核温度。例如,在 Yoga 7 2 合 1 16 英寸处理器上就可以观察到类似的 Turbo Boost 行为。 Yoga 7 2 合 1 16IML9上也能观察到类似的 Turbo Boost 行为。
当运行《赛博朋克 2077》来代表游戏负载时,GPU 时钟频率和温度将稳定在 1300 MHz 和 71 C。IdeaPad Slim 5 16 的性能和温度平衡上限似乎是 70 C。更快的替代产品,如 戴尔 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1相比之下,温度可高达 85 摄氏度以上。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 44 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.2 | -- | 70 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.5 | 850 | 70 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 0.9 | 1300 | 71 |
系统性能
PCMark 结果落后于价格更高的替代产品,如 IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9或 Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 等采用更快 Core Ultra H CPU 的机型。由于我们的机型集成的 Iris Xe 96 EUs GPU 速度较慢,因此在数字内容创建子测试中的劣势最大。执行 GPU 较重任务的用户可能需要考虑比 ideaPad Slim 5 16 速度更快的产品。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6080 - 6173, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10856 - 11219, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8387 - 8399, n=2) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6701 - 6775, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
CrossMark / Overall | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1660 - 1734, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1649 - 1778, n=2) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1708 - 1730, n=2) | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1493 - 1685, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (307 - 311, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (271 - 276, n=2) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (489 - 502, n=2) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6173 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (36579 - 61190, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (39827 - 68780, n=4) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (44925 - 78327, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (74.5 - 100, n=4) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开主页的多个浏览器标签页时,LatencyMon 会显示轻微的 DPC 问题。在播放 4K60 视频时,我们还能在 60 秒的时间内记录到 3 次丢帧。CPU 利用率偶尔会飙升到高于必要的水平,表明后台应用程序处理不当,可能会影响性能。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备配备了中端 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ4X112NPCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘,在我们的测试中提供了高达 4500 MB/s 的稳定传输速率。其性能略低于 IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 中的三星 PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB,但与中端酷睿 U 系列 CPU 搭配使用还是很不错的。
尽管硬盘的外形尺寸只有 42 毫米,但我们没有发现任何节流现象。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
集成图形处理器来自较早的 Iris Xe 96 EUs由于酷睿 7 150U 是去年 Raptor Lake 系列的换代产品,因此其性能在我们数据库中的 200 台个人样机中得到了充分证明。因此,我们数据库中的 200 多台个人样本 PC 都对其性能进行了详细记录。GPU 的速度比最新的 Arc 8GPU 要慢 40% 到 50%。联想用户必须升级到更昂贵的 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 才能获得这样的选择,因为我们的 IdeaPad Slim 5 16 G9 只能使用 U 系列处理器。
电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 5237 | 18238 | 1913 |
平衡模式 | 5209 | 19200 | 1914 |
电池供电 | 5167 | 19504 | 1920 |
如Fire Strike 上表所示,以平衡模式或电池供电运行不会影响性能。
3DMark 11 Performance | 7001 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 23459 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4908 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1764 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 113.9 | 98.4 | 24.8 | 10.5 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 94.2 | 60.2 | 33.9 | 15.2 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 110.1 | 85.4 | 68.6 | 60.1 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 45.9 | 25.2 | 17.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 39.1 | 38.1 | 33 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 45 | 24 | 22 | 21 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 91.2 | 39.8 | 31.1 | 25.3 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 30.5 | 23 | 15 | 11.6 |
F1 22 (2022) | 47.9 | 42.7 | 30.4 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 16 | 13 | 10.6 | 9.3 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 18.7 | 14.7 | 12.4 | 10.9 |
排放量
系统噪音 - 无恼人的脉冲行为
在桌面上空转或运行 Word 或 Excel 等要求不高的进程时,内部风扇会保持静音。不过,大多数时候,在浏览网页或视频流媒体时,它的噪音徘徊在 28 dB(A)左右,背景噪音为 23 dB(A)。在大多数家庭或办公环境中,这样的噪音仍足以让人察觉不到。
遗憾的是,当负载较高时,风扇噪音会迅速上升。在3DMark 06第一个基准测试场景进行到一半时,即使使用平衡电源配置文件,我们也能记录到略高于 43 dB(A) 的噪音水平。这与我们在 IdeaPad Pro 5 16、Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1 和 Pavilion Plus 16在类似测试条件下的测试结果一致。在运行游戏时,风扇噪音预计会徘徊在 40 dB(A) 以上,这在采用 U 系列 CPU 的笔记本电脑中是一个相当常见的上限。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 23 dB(A) |
Load |
| 43.3 / 40.9 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP Vega 7, R5 7530U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -8% | -5% | 2% | -24% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 24.1 -5% | 22.9 -0% | 22.22 3% | 24.3 -6% | |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 24.1 -5% | 22.9 -0% | 22.22 3% | 24.3 -6% | |
Idle Average * | 23 | 24.1 -5% | 22.9 -0% | 22.22 3% | 24.3 -6% | |
Idle Maximum * | 23 | 28.2 -23% | 25 -9% | 22.22 3% | 24.3 -6% | |
Load Average * | 43.3 | 44.4 -3% | 45.1 -4% | 42.03 3% | 29.7 31% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 40.8 | 44.9 -10% | 50.7 -24% | |||
Load Maximum * | 40.9 | 44.4 -9% | 44.9 -10% | 42.1 -3% | 41.4 -1% | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.5 | 42.1 | 32.1 |
* ... smaller is better
温度--无关紧要
机箱左半部分的表面温度较高,WASD 键的热点温度可达 35 摄氏度以上。对于 U 系列 CPU 而言,16 英寸的外形尺寸算是较大的,因此即使在负载情况下,表面温度也相对较低。以配备速度更快的 H 系列 CPU 的 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1 为例,在类似条件下会达到 45 摄氏度以上,在使用过程中温度会明显升高。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.4 °C / 2.5 F).
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 3% | -20% | -32% | -21% | ||
Maximum Upper Side * | 35.4 | 36.3 -3% | 46.8 -32% | 49.6 -40% | 40.8 -15% | |
Maximum Bottom * | 33 | 39.1 -18% | 45.6 -38% | 45.8 -39% | 50.5 -53% | |
Idle Upper Side * | 30.2 | 24.9 18% | 32.2 -7% | 39.2 -30% | 29.3 3% | |
Idle Bottom * | 30.2 | 26.1 14% | 31.4 -4% | 35.4 -17% | 35.2 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
功耗低于运行在速度更快的 Meteor Lake-H 平台上的系统,这是意料之中的。同时,我们的机型与运行酷睿 i7-1365U 的旧机型(如 ThinkPad T14s G4之间的差异微乎其微,平均只有几个百分点。考虑到酷睿 7 150U 的性能与酷睿 i7-1365U 非常相似,而且在每瓦性能方面没有逐年提升,因此这些数字并不令人惊讶。
当 CPU 的利用率达到 100% 时,我们可以记录到小巧(约 9 x 4.7 x 2.7 厘米)的 65 W USB-C AC 适配器的最大功耗为 63 W。如上文压力测试部分所示,由于散热限制,这个速率只是暂时的,只能持续一分钟左右。
Off / Standby | 0.29 / 0.61 Watt |
Idle | 3.3 / 7.5 / 7.8 Watt |
Load |
56.9 / 62.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Micron 2550 1TB, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP R5 7530U, Vega 7, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -27% | -61% | -45% | 2% | ||
Idle Minimum * | 3.3 | 3.5 -6% | 6.1 -85% | 3.3 -0% | 3.7 -12% | |
Idle Average * | 7.5 | 9.6 -28% | 13.5 -80% | 7.3 3% | 7.1 5% | |
Idle Maximum * | 7.8 | 9.9 -27% | 13.8 -77% | 14.24 -83% | 7.7 1% | |
Load Average * | 56.9 | 62.7 -10% | 63.6 -12% | 91.7 -61% | 43.9 23% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 48.7 | 67 -38% | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 41.2 | 64.6 -57% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 62.4 | 101.2 -62% | 109.7 -76% | 115.8 -86% | 66.6 -7% | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 55.8 | 96.2 | 40.8 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
57 瓦时的电池容量对于 16 英寸的机型来说较小。不过,如前所述,如果需要,用户可以升级到容量更大的 76 Wh 电池。57 Wh 电池的实际 WLAN 浏览时间超过 12.5 小时,运行时间仍然很好,与 IdeaPad Pro 5 16或 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1 的电池容量相当。
从空电充至满电需要 90 多分钟。
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 84 Wh | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 90 Wh | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP R5 7530U, Vega 7, 45 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -15% | -9% | -18% | -20% | ||
Reader / Idle | 1568 | 1310 -16% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 761 | 756 -1% | 686 -10% | 624 -18% | 605 -20% | |
Load | 94 | 68 -28% | 93 -1% | |||
H.264 | 957 | 720 | 696 |
Pros
Cons
结论:简单的解决方案,没有花哨的功能
IdeaPad Slim 5 16 适合那些既希望拥有不显眼、相对便携的 16 英寸屏幕,又不想破费的用户。为了保持较低的起售价和吸引更多眼球,IdeaPad Slim 5 16 没有或仅提供了迷你 LED、OLED、Wi-Fi 7 和人工智能加速等高级功能。如果你打算将该系统主要用于网页浏览、视频、学校作业或其他要求不高的任务,那么你可能会喜欢它的大屏幕、轻薄的外形以及相对于价格而言还算不错的处理器性能。
联想 IdeaPad Slim 5 16 是一款专为基本生产力和多媒体而设计的基本蛤壳型笔记本电脑。酷睿7 150U性能不错,但与老款酷睿i7-1365U相比并无实质性提升。你可以选择酷睿 i7-1365U 而不损失任何性能,为自己省下一点钱。
更高端的配置配备了 OLED 和人工智能加速功能,以吸引编辑并改善多媒体播放。不过,竞争对手如 VivoBook Pro 16 或 Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 等竞争对手在内容创作方面要强大得多,而且价格也相差无几。以华硕为例,搭载酷睿 i9-13900H 和 RTX 4060 的价格低于 1100 美元,而戴尔搭载 mini-LED 和酷睿 Ultra 7 155H 的价格也低于 1100 美元。在这个价位上,IdeaPad Slim 5 16 失去了性能优势,取而代之的是更轻薄的设计。
价格和供应情况
亚马逊目前正在销售联想 IdeaPad Slim 5 16 配置,评论价格为 800 美元。
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9
- 07/29/2024 v8
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.