英特尔酷睿 7 150U 性能首次亮相:联想 IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 笔记本电脑评测
IdeaPad Slim 5 系列是联想最经济实惠的笔记本电脑。这些机型低于更高端的 IdeaPad Pro 系列, IdeaPad Flex 系列和 Yoga 7 系列在功能和性能方面都不相上下。今年的 IdeaPad Slim 5 16 配备了 Raptor Lake 刷新 CPU 以及更昂贵的 Meteor Lake-U 选项。
我们的测试机是低端配置,配备 Raptor Lake Core 7 150U 和 1200p IPS 触摸屏,售价仅为 800 美元。较低端的配置为酷睿 5 120U,而最昂贵的配置为 1280p OLED 显示屏。此外,所有选件都只配备集成显卡。
该机型的流星湖酷睿 Ultra 版本以 IdeaPad Slim 5 16IMH9 命名。否则,配备 Raptor Lake CPU 的型号称为 IdeaPad Slim 7 16IRU9。
IdeaPad Slim 5 16 的竞争对手包括其他经济型 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑,如 惠普Pavilion Plus 16华硕 Vivobook S16 或 戴尔 Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1.
更多联想评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
74.7 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.8 kg | 16.9 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
87.9 % | v7 (old) | 05/2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.9 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
82.1 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 2.1 kg | 18.99 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.7 % | v7 (old) | 02/2024 | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.6 kg | 16 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | ||||
85.7 % | v7 (old) | 11/2023 | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP R5 7530U, Vega 7 | 1.8 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 时尚而基本的设计
与惠普Pavilion 系列相比,我们的测试设备采用全金属表面处理,手感非常光滑,外观也更加整洁。表面和边缘都非常平整,没有额外的纹理、痕迹或装饰。可以说这是一种乏味的外观,但我们很欣赏联想为预算有限的目标家庭用户所做的简约设计,因为他们可能对华而不实的设计不感兴趣。
机箱的刚性不错,但并不完美。盖子和底座的弯曲和嘎吱声比我们在最近的 Yoga 7 二合一 16尤其是铰链的硬度,以减少调整角度时的晃动。即便如此,这些都不是令人担忧的主要原因,它们只是反映了该机型以预算为导向的设计。
尺寸和重量几乎与 IdeaPad Pro 5 16尽管它们的内部和外部存在各种差异。这意味着,您并不一定会因为 IdeaPad Slim 5 16 价格便宜而买到更厚或更重的笔记本电脑。
请注意,IdeaPad Slim 5 16 是用户可以选择塑料或金属材质的少数机型之一。塑料机型比金属机型略厚 1 毫米,重量略轻 30 克。为了节省成本,用户可能更倾向于选择不太奢华的塑料机型。
连接性
端口选项包括价格较高的 IdeaPad Pro 5 16但也有一些重要的例外。首先,读卡器仅支持 MicroSD 而非全尺寸 SD 卡。其次,USB-C 端口不支持 Thunderbolt,只兼容 Power Delivery 和 DisplayPort 1.4。最后,HDMI 端口的版本是 1.4,而惠普Pavilion 16 等竞争机型的版本是 2.1。IdeaPad Slim 5 16 在一些发烧级功能上的 "偷工减料 "有助于将其与联想更昂贵的机型区分开来。
SD 读卡器
集成读卡器的传输速率与我们在更昂贵的 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 上记录的传输速率大致相同。与 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1 上较慢的读卡器相比,性能最多可提高 3 倍。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
交流
标配的英特尔 AX203 支持 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.2 连接。为节约成本,不支持 Wi-Fi 7。与华硕 AXE11000 测试路由器配对后,传输速率稳定可靠。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 |
网络摄像头
标配 200 万像素网络摄像头,在同类产品和同价位产品中属于中等水平。内置物理快门,但没有红外传感器,不支持面部识别。
维护
只需一把 T5 梅花螺丝刀,就能轻松拆下底部面板。需要注意的是,虽然我们的设备配备了 42 毫米 M.2 固态硬盘,但仍支持全长 80 毫米硬盘。内存是焊接的,用户无法升级。
有三种电池规格可供选择:47 Wh、57 Wh 和 76 Wh。我们的测试机配备的是 57 Wh 电池,这也解释了为什么配置 76 Wh 电池的机型左下角有未使用的空间。
可持续性
包装由可回收纸张、由 30% 海洋废弃物制成的塑料和由大于 90% 的可回收成分制成的软泡沫组成。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了交流适配器和文件外没有其他附件。如果在美国购买,制造商提供一年有限保修。
输入设备 - 浅型和软型
键盘
键入体验并不令人满意,因为按键的感觉很浅。例如,回车键和空格键通常比主要的 QWERTY 键更响亮、更有点击感,但联想的情况并非如此。按键的反馈比 惠普Pavilion Plus 16给人一种廉价的感觉。
反馈较弱的好处是打字时发出的咔哒声较小。因此,如果在较小的教室或会议室,该机型对他人的干扰较小。
触摸板
这里的点击板尺寸为 12 x 7.5 厘米,不如更昂贵的 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 上 13.5 x 8 厘米的点击板宽敞。不过,当按下键盘输入点击操作时,键盘表面的响声和 "咔嗒 "的反应速度还是让我们大吃一惊。相比之下,这个价位的大多数其他笔记本电脑(如华硕 VivoBook 系列)上的点击板往往更松软,反馈也更弱。
展示 - 大多平庸
有以下四种显示选项。我们的设备配置了黑体选项。
- 1920 x 1200,无触摸,IPS,300 尼特,哑光,60% sRGB,60 赫兹,无 HDR
- 1920 x 1200,无触摸屏,IPS,300 尼特,哑光,100% sRGB,60 赫兹,无 HDR
- 1920 x 1200,触摸屏,300 尼特,哑光,60% sRGB,60 赫兹,无 HDR
- 2048 x 1280,非触摸屏,OLED,400 尼特,亮面,100% DCI-P3,120 赫兹,HDR500
由于面板的色彩范围有限,我们建议避免第一和第三个选项。这两种面板是你可以选择的最低端面板,因为它们在 sRGB 覆盖率和刷新率方面明显不如大多数竞争对手。遗憾的是,触摸屏用户只能选择这款机型的单一面板。
好在我们的触摸屏面板的响应时间和对比度至少还算不错,足以满足休闲游戏和多媒体播放的需要。不过,如果要进行图形编辑或获得更好的多媒体体验,OLED 面板将更胜一筹。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 313.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 847:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95, calibrated: 2.16
ΔE Greyscale 8.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
42.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.83
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 NE160QDM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 AU Optronics B160QAT, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 90 Hz | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx AU Optronics AUOFDA4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M SDC4178, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 54% | 106% | 73% | -2% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 41.5 | 63.3 53% | 99.4 140% | 74.6 80% | 40.4 -3% | |
sRGB Coverage | 61.2 | 95.2 56% | 100 63% | 99 62% | 59.8 -2% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.9 | 65.3 52% | 92.5 116% | 76.5 78% | 42 -2% | |
Response Times | 30% | -138% | 56% | -58% | ||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 20.7 ? | 15 ? 28% | 15.4 ? 26% | 9.06 ? 56% | 32.8 ? -58% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 15.1 ? | 10.3 ? 32% | 60.6 ? -301% | 6.7 ? 56% | 23.9 ? -58% | |
PWM Frequency | 2753.7 ? | |||||
Screen | 38% | 69% | 34% | 0% | ||
Brightness middle | 313.3 | 368 17% | 413 32% | 403 29% | 310 -1% | |
Brightness | 308 | 368 19% | 409 33% | 394 28% | 290 -6% | |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 91 0% | 97 7% | 90 -1% | 86 -5% | |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.31 16% | 0.14 62% | 0.34 8% | 0.22 41% | |
Contrast | 847 | 1187 40% | 2950 248% | 1185 40% | 1409 66% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.42 | 2.4 71% | 3.48 59% | 3.13 63% | 6.2 26% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.09 | 6.5 66% | 6.97 63% | 6.14 68% | 24.7 -29% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.16 | 0.8 63% | 1.65 24% | 5.3 -145% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.3 | 4.5 46% | 4.5 46% | 4.5 46% | 3.8 54% | |
Gamma | 2.83 78% | 2.21 100% | 2.15 102% | 2.18 101% | 2.22 99% | |
CCT | 6296 103% | 6324 103% | 6446 101% | 6261 104% | 6011 108% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 41% /
40% | 12% /
46% | 54% /
46% | -20% /
-9% |
* ... smaller is better
显示器开箱后的校准效果很差,灰度和色彩 deltaE 平均值分别高达 8.3 和 8.42。使用 X-Rite 色度计进行校准后,平均 deltaE 值分别降至 1.9 和 2.16,明显改善了这些缺陷。即便如此,由于上述有限的 sRGB 色彩,在饱和度较高的情况下,色彩仍然会变得非常不准确。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
15.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.7 ms rise | |
↘ 7.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
20.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise | |
↘ 9.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17271 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
300 尼特的亮度在目前大多数笔记本电脑中属于低端水平。在户外工作时,尤其是在阳光下工作时,可能会出现眩光和色彩失真。升级到亮度稍高的 OLED 面板也不会对观看体验有太大改善,因为其光泽覆盖只会放大眩光。
性能
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 和联想 Vantage 设置为性能模式。Vantage 软件再次进行了重新设计,增加了太多的子菜单。例如,"电源配置文件 "部分就被埋在两个子菜单下,甚至需要滚动才能看到。不过,我们还是很喜欢这些选项和可调设置。
处理器
酷睿 7 150U 核心 7 150U可视为 酷睿 i7-1365U因为两者具有相同的内核数、线程数、L1/L2/L3 高速缓存大小和底层 Raptor Lake-U 架构。甚至它们的基本时钟频率也仅相差 100 MHz,在所有方面都基本相同。
CineBench 的结果显示,酷睿 7 150U 与价格更高的 Meteor Lake 相比,差距不到 5%。 酷睿至尊 7 155U、较旧的酷睿 i7-1365U 和竞争产品 Ryzen 7 7730U和竞争对手 Ryzen 7 7730U。在单线程负载方面,它比 AMD 的替代产品更具优势。虽然与去年的酷睿 i7-1365U 相比,今年的优势令人失望,但整体性能实际上与酷睿 Ultra 7 U 系列不相上下,因此在执行传统 CPU 任务时,价格更低的酷睿 7 150U 并不慢。
相反,酷睿 7 150U 与成本更高的流星湖系列替代产品的主要区别在于没有集成 NPU,尽管这款笔记本电脑仍然配备了 Co-Pilot 键。如果你打算在不久的将来频繁使用 Co-Pilot 或其他 AI 增强型任务,那么在我们的 IdeaPad Slim 5 16 配置上,它们的运行速度可能会更慢。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U () | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G5 21ML005JGE | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U () |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U () |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U () |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U () |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U () |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U () |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U () | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U () | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U () |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U () | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力测试时,处理器的频率会飙升至 2.8 GHz,功耗为 37 W,温度为 90 C。然而,大约一分钟后,处理器频率将降至 2.2 GHz,功耗降至 22 W,以保持 70 C 的低内核温度。例如,在 Yoga 7 2 合 1 16 英寸处理器上就可以观察到类似的 Turbo Boost 行为。 Yoga 7 2 合 1 16IML9上也能观察到类似的 Turbo Boost 行为。
当运行《赛博朋克 2077》来代表游戏负载时,GPU 时钟频率和温度将稳定在 1300 MHz 和 71 C。IdeaPad Slim 5 16 的性能和温度平衡上限似乎是 70 C。更快的替代产品,如 戴尔 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1相比之下,温度可高达 85 摄氏度以上。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 44 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.2 | -- | 70 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.5 | 850 | 70 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 0.9 | 1300 | 71 |
系统性能
PCMark 结果落后于价格更高的替代产品,如 IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9或 Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 等采用更快 Core Ultra H CPU 的机型。由于我们的机型集成的 Iris Xe 96 EUs GPU 速度较慢,因此在数字内容创建子测试中的劣势最大。执行 GPU 较重任务的用户可能需要考虑比 ideaPad Slim 5 16 速度更快的产品。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs () | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs () | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs () |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs () | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
CrossMark / Overall | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs () | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs () | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs () | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs () | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs () | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs () | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs () | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6173 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U () | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U () | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U () | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U () | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开主页的多个浏览器标签页时,LatencyMon 会显示轻微的 DPC 问题。在播放 4K60 视频时,我们还能在 60 秒的时间内记录到 3 次丢帧。CPU 利用率偶尔会飙升到高于必要的水平,表明后台应用程序处理不当,可能会影响性能。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备配备了中端 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ4X112NPCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘,在我们的测试中提供了高达 4500 MB/s 的稳定传输速率。其性能略低于 IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 中的三星 PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB,但与中端酷睿 U 系列 CPU 搭配使用还是很不错的。
尽管硬盘的外形尺寸只有 42 毫米,但我们没有发现任何节流现象。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M -11! |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
集成图形处理器来自较早的 Iris Xe 96 EUs由于酷睿 7 150U 是去年 Raptor Lake 系列的换代产品,因此其性能在我们数据库中的 200 台个人样机中得到了充分证明。因此,我们数据库中的 200 多台个人样本 PC 都对其性能进行了详细记录。GPU 的速度比最新的 Arc 8GPU 要慢 40% 到 50%。联想用户必须升级到更昂贵的 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 才能获得这样的选择,因为我们的 IdeaPad Slim 5 16 G9 只能使用 U 系列处理器。
电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 5237 | 18238 | 1913 |
平衡模式 | 5209 | 19200 | 1914 |
电池供电 | 5167 | 19504 | 1920 |
如Fire Strike 上表所示,以平衡模式或电池供电运行不会影响性能。
3DMark 11 Performance | 7001 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 23459 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4908 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1764 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 -1! | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M -3! | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
GTA V (2015) | 113.9 | 98.4 | 24.8 | 10.5 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 94.2 | 60.2 | 33.9 | 15.2 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 110.1 | 85.4 | 68.6 | 60.1 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 45.9 | 25.2 | 17.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 39.1 | 38.1 | 33 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 45 | 24 | 22 | 21 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 91.2 | 39.8 | 31.1 | 25.3 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 30.5 | 23 | 15 | 11.6 |
F1 22 (2022) | 47.9 | 42.7 | 30.4 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 16 | 13 | 10.6 | 9.3 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 18.7 | 14.7 | 12.4 | 10.9 |
排放量
系统噪音 - 无恼人的脉冲行为
在桌面上空转或运行 Word 或 Excel 等要求不高的进程时,内部风扇会保持静音。不过,大多数时候,在浏览网页或视频流媒体时,它的噪音徘徊在 28 dB(A)左右,背景噪音为 23 dB(A)。在大多数家庭或办公环境中,这样的噪音仍足以让人察觉不到。
遗憾的是,当负载较高时,风扇噪音会迅速上升。在3DMark 06第一个基准测试场景进行到一半时,即使使用平衡电源配置文件,我们也能记录到略高于 43 dB(A) 的噪音水平。这与我们在 IdeaPad Pro 5 16、Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1 和 Pavilion Plus 16在类似测试条件下的测试结果一致。在运行游戏时,风扇噪音预计会徘徊在 40 dB(A) 以上,这在采用 U 系列 CPU 的笔记本电脑中是一个相当常见的上限。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 23 dB(A) |
Load |
| 43.3 / 40.9 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP Vega 7, R5 7530U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -8% | -5% | 2% | 1% | ||
off / environment * | 23 | 24.1 -5% | 22.9 -0% | 22.22 3% | 24.3 -6% | |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 24.1 -5% | 22.9 -0% | 22.22 3% | 24.3 -6% | |
Idle Average * | 23 | 24.1 -5% | 22.9 -0% | 22.22 3% | 24.3 -6% | |
Idle Maximum * | 23 | 28.2 -23% | 25 -9% | 22.22 3% | 24.3 -6% | |
Load Average * | 43.3 | 44.4 -3% | 45.1 -4% | 42.03 3% | 29.7 31% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 40.8 | 44.9 -10% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 40.9 | 44.4 -9% | 44.9 -10% | 42.1 -3% | 41.4 -1% | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.5 | 42.1 | 32.1 |
* ... smaller is better
温度--无关紧要
机箱左半部分的表面温度较高,WASD 键的热点温度可达 35 摄氏度以上。对于 U 系列 CPU 而言,16 英寸的外形尺寸算是较大的,因此即使在负载情况下,表面温度也相对较低。以配备速度更快的 H 系列 CPU 的 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1 为例,在类似条件下会达到 45 摄氏度以上,在使用过程中温度会明显升高。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.4 °C / 2.5 F).
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 3% | -20% | -32% | -21% | ||
Maximum Upper Side * | 35.4 | 36.3 -3% | 46.8 -32% | 49.6 -40% | 40.8 -15% | |
Maximum Bottom * | 33 | 39.1 -18% | 45.6 -38% | 45.8 -39% | 50.5 -53% | |
Idle Upper Side * | 30.2 | 24.9 18% | 32.2 -7% | 39.2 -30% | 29.3 3% | |
Idle Bottom * | 30.2 | 26.1 14% | 31.4 -4% | 35.4 -17% | 35.2 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
功耗低于运行在速度更快的 Meteor Lake-H 平台上的系统,这是意料之中的。同时,我们的机型与运行酷睿 i7-1365U 的旧机型(如 ThinkPad T14s G4之间的差异微乎其微,平均只有几个百分点。考虑到酷睿 7 150U 的性能与酷睿 i7-1365U 非常相似,而且在每瓦性能方面没有逐年提升,因此这些数字并不令人惊讶。
当 CPU 的利用率达到 100% 时,我们可以记录到小巧(约 9 x 4.7 x 2.7 厘米)的 65 W USB-C AC 适配器的最大功耗为 63 W。如上文压力测试部分所示,由于散热限制,这个速率只是暂时的,只能持续一分钟左右。
Off / Standby | 0.29 / 0.61 Watt |
Idle | 3.3 / 7.5 / 7.8 Watt |
Load |
56.9 / 62.4 Watt |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Micron 2550 1TB, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP R5 7530U, Vega 7, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -27% | -61% | -45% | 2% | ||
Idle Minimum * | 3.3 | 3.5 -6% | 6.1 -85% | 3.3 -0% | 3.7 -12% | |
Idle Average * | 7.5 | 9.6 -28% | 13.5 -80% | 7.3 3% | 7.1 5% | |
Idle Maximum * | 7.8 | 9.9 -27% | 13.8 -77% | 14.24 -83% | 7.7 1% | |
Load Average * | 56.9 | 62.7 -10% | 63.6 -12% | 91.7 -61% | 43.9 23% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 48.7 | 67 -38% | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 41.2 | 64.6 -57% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 62.4 | 101.2 -62% | 109.7 -76% | 115.8 -86% | 66.6 -7% | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 55.8 | 96.2 | 40.8 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
57 瓦时的电池容量对于 16 英寸的机型来说较小。不过,如前所述,如果需要,用户可以升级到容量更大的 76 Wh 电池。57 Wh 电池的实际 WLAN 浏览时间超过 12.5 小时,运行时间仍然很好,与 IdeaPad Pro 5 16或 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1 的电池容量相当。
从空电充至满电需要 90 多分钟。
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 84 Wh | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 90 Wh | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP R5 7530U, Vega 7, 45 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -15% | -9% | -18% | -20% | ||
Reader / Idle | 1568 | 1310 -16% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 761 | 756 -1% | 686 -10% | 624 -18% | 605 -20% | |
Load | 94 | 68 -28% | 93 -1% | |||
H.264 | 957 | 720 | 696 |
Pros
Cons
结论:简单的解决方案,没有花哨的功能
IdeaPad Slim 5 16 适合那些既希望拥有不显眼、相对便携的 16 英寸屏幕,又不想破费的用户。为了保持较低的起售价和吸引更多眼球,IdeaPad Slim 5 16 没有或仅提供了迷你 LED、OLED、Wi-Fi 7 和人工智能加速等高级功能。如果你打算将该系统主要用于网页浏览、视频、学校作业或其他要求不高的任务,那么你可能会喜欢它的大屏幕、轻薄的外形以及相对于价格而言还算不错的处理器性能。
联想 IdeaPad Slim 5 16 是一款专为基本生产力和多媒体而设计的基本蛤壳型笔记本电脑。酷睿7 150U性能不错,但与老款酷睿i7-1365U相比并无实质性提升。你可以选择酷睿 i7-1365U 而不损失任何性能,为自己省下一点钱。
更高端的配置配备了 OLED 和人工智能加速功能,以吸引编辑并改善多媒体播放。不过,竞争对手如 VivoBook Pro 16 或 Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 等竞争对手在内容创作方面要强大得多,而且价格也相差无几。以华硕为例,搭载酷睿 i9-13900H 和 RTX 4060 的价格低于 1100 美元,而戴尔搭载 mini-LED 和酷睿 Ultra 7 155H 的价格也低于 1100 美元。在这个价位上,IdeaPad Slim 5 16 失去了性能优势,取而代之的是更轻薄的设计。
价格和供应情况
亚马逊目前正在销售联想 IdeaPad Slim 5 16 配置,评论价格为 800 美元。
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9
-
07/29/2024 v8
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.