卡特彼勒CAT S75评测--带卫星通讯和水下摄像头的户外智能手机
据制造商称，Cat S75的建议售价为599欧元，是有史以来最可靠的Cat智能手机。这款户外手机的外壳通过了IP68以及IP69K标准的认证，还能抵御极端温度、湿度和振动。
Cat S75有一个6.6英寸、120赫兹的IPS显示屏和一个带水下模式的三摄像头设置。这款坚固耐用的手机由一个 联发科Dimensity 930，它有6GB的内存和128GB的闪存。最新的Cat后代的特殊功能是Bullitt卫星连接功能，它可以与静止卫星进行通信。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79.7 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | CAT S75 Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256 | 268 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.58" | 2408x1080 | |
| 78.3 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | CAT S53 SD 480, Adreno 619 | 320 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 82.6 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | Gigaset GX6 Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4 | 278 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" | 2412x1080 | |
| 81.9 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L | 235 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 |
保护壳 - 带凹槽的户外智能手机
Cat S75的重点是高稳定性和抗摔性，但显示屏与表面的比率仅有76.7%，很受影响。这款来自卡特彼勒的耐用智能手机通过了IP-68/69K和MIL-STD-810H的认证--你可以在这里阅读有关军事标准及其缺点https://www.notebookcheck.com/Bekommt-die-Smartphone-Landschaft-mit-dem-MIL-STD-810-einen-neuen-Schutzstandard.396881.0.html.
Cat S75的做工处于良好水平，但这款户外手机并没有真正意义上的高质量。然而，根据制造商的说法，塑料外壳可以用刷子和消毒湿巾清洗，还含有抗菌银离子。IP69K认证甚至可以保护Cat S75在短距离高压清洗时不受热水影响。
设备 - CAT S75带卫星电话
这款户外手机的功能包括Miracast、一个状态LED、蓝牙5.1和NFC。外围设备也可以通过USB-C端口使用OTG适配器连接。USB接口使用慢速2.0标准进行数据传输。
Cat S75只有6GB内存和128GB内部UFS存储的版本。需要更多存储空间的人可以通过microSD卡进行扩展。
微型SD卡读卡器
集成的microSD插槽支持当前的SDHC和SDXC标准，但内存只能增加128GB。结合我们的参考卡Angelbird AV PRO V60，这款户外手机在跨平台磁盘测试中的表现相当令人信服。然而，Cat S75的复制速度很慢，不到20MB/s。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| CAT S53 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Gigaset GX6 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
| CAT S75 (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件--户外智能手机与Android 12
这款猫咪智能手机装运的是谷歌的操作系统Android 12。制造商宣传说对其坚固耐用的手机有五年的更新支持，但只计划进行两次主要的Android 更新。相应地，供应将在下一个Android 代14结束。
安全更新可使用三年，但只有关键的安全漏洞会在另外两年内得到修复。在测试时，Cat S75的安全补丁从2023年2月起已经过时。
通信和GNSS - CAT S75与5G
卡特彼勒公司的耐用手机除了支持高级手机必须的4G和5G之外，还可以通过Bullitt Satellite Messenger实现卫星通信（NTN）。这项卫星服务，但没有短信，可以在购买Cat智能手机后的12个月内免费使用。在这之后，必须进行订阅，每月费用高达60欧元。
与其依赖一个专有的卫星网络，不如使用 Apple iPhone 14 Pro由于采用了联发科芯片，Cat S75通过传统的3GPP NTN信号进行通信，因此可以根据哪颗卫星实现最佳连接质量，使用不同供应商的卫星。因此，即使在没有移动网络的情况下，用户应该总是能够发送和接收短信，并拨打紧急电话。
这款户外手机只提供家庭Wi-Fi网络内的Wi-Fi 5，结合我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，只够平均传输速率低于400Mbps。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| CAT S53 | |
| CAT S75 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=190, last 2 years) | |
| CAT S53 | |
| CAT S75 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1945, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone (668 - 1864, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
Cat S75使用卫星网络GPS、BeiDou、Galileo和Glonass双频以及SBAS进行定位。这款手机在户外提供了良好的准确性。我们还检查了在自行车旅行中的定位精度，并将结果与Garmin的Venu 2智能手表进行比较。 Cat S75的路线与参考设备的路线非常接近。
电话和语音质量--双SIM卡的耐用电话
Cat S75通过移动网络的通话质量，包括VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话，都很好，内置的麦克风可以大声清晰地传输声音。在测试中，通过安装的前置摄像头进行视频通话也没有问题。这款户外手机支持双卡，但在使用卫星服务时需要占用一个卡槽。
相机 - CAT S75，50MP
后置的主摄像头有一个f/1.8的开放光圈。5千万像素的图像传感器提供了坚实的照片质量，至少在明亮的光线条件下。然而，考虑到这个价格范围，锐度和图像细节都不是真正令人信服的。后置摄像头单元在低光照条件下也只有一个适度的好成绩。随着光线的减少，模糊度明显增加--这也适用于低分辨率的超广角镜头在白天的情况。
然而，据制造商称，Cat S75的亮点在于其双摄像头单元是防水的，甚至可以承受五米深的水压而不受损害。这款户外手机还搭载了相应的水下模式。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow LightWide-angle
配件和保修 - 户外手机不含电源适配器
我们的Cat S75在交货范围内既没有充电器也没有汽车适配器。此外，显示器上也没有保护膜。盒子里只有一条USB线和信息资料。
制造商为其智能手机提供24个月的保修。对其智能手机提供24个月的保修，在有CAT服务的地方，该保修在全球范围内有效。在紧急情况下，客户和帮助服务（危机应对中心）也可以通过Bullitt卫星信使以200多种语言一年365天提供。
输入和操作 - 带有指纹传感器的坚固手机
Cat S75提供两个可编程的按键，可用于按压式通话和紧急呼叫。这款户外手机有一个电容式触摸屏，具有令人信服的滑行特性。在精确度方面也没有什么可抱怨的，所以我们用手指的输入都能准确实现。
集成在背面的指纹传感器可以可靠地解锁这款坚固耐用的手机。从待机模式到显示屏打开的时间也足够短。还提供了通过前置摄像头（2D）的FaceUnlock功能，在良好的照明条件下可以很快识别用户。
显示屏 - 带有IPS的户外手机
Cat S75配备了一个6.58英寸的IPS显示屏，其分辨率达到了不寻常的2408 x 1080像素。实现的像素密度略高于400 ppi大关。这款Cat智能手机没有使用脉冲宽度调制（PWM）进行亮度控制。
这款坚固耐用的智能手机在亮度方面只能在有限的范围内说服人。我们在纯白的背景上测得的最大亮度为580cd/m²--从竞争者的角度来看，这是一个不错的比率，但对于一款为户外使用而设计的手机来说，仍然很低。即使是采用AMOLED屏幕的廉价中档手机，如 Redmi Note 12屏，也能照得更亮。在更现实的APL18测量中，在黑暗区域，它几乎是相同的602 cd/m²。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 566 cd/m²
Contrast: 1204:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.02 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.248
| CAT S75 IPS LCD, 2408x1080, 6.6" | CAT S53 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Gigaset GX6 IPS, 2412x1080, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -0% | 18% | -30% | 43% | |
| Brightness middle | 566 | 476 -16% | 505 -11% | 510 -10% | 650 15% |
| Brightness | 529 | 504 -5% | 491 -7% | 495 -6% | 658 24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 82 -1% | 93 12% | 92 11% | 97 17% |
| Black Level * | 0.47 | 0.6 -28% | 0.3 36% | 0.46 2% | |
| Contrast | 1204 | 793 -34% | 1683 40% | 1109 -8% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.02 | 3.18 37% | 4.32 14% | 7.41 -48% | 1.55 69% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.6 | 5.86 39% | 7.22 25% | 13.26 -38% | 2.59 73% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 4.2 5% | 3 32% | 10.6 -141% | 1.8 59% |
| Gamma | 2.248 98% | 2.268 97% | 2.268 97% | 2.518 87% | 2.194 100% |
| CCT | 7173 91% | 7234 90% | 7098 92% | 10050 65% | 6316 103% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在我们的显示测量中，Cat S75的IPS面板实现了0.47cd/m²的稳固黑值。超过1000:1的对比度仍然令人满意。
显示分析是在光谱仪和Calman软件的帮助下进行的。色彩（5.0）和灰度（4.4）再现的偏差应被评为高，与参考色的差异是清晰可见的。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
这款户外手机在户外留下了坚实的印象，但显示内容在阳光直射下几乎看不到。在平视角度下，IPS面板的颜色很稳定，但显示屏看起来有点褪色。
性能 - CAT S75采用联发科SoC系统
在Cat S75内部工作的是一个 联发科Dimensity 930，包括一个Imagination IMG BXM-8-256作为图形单元。该系统的速度在日常使用中是足够的，但小的滞后仍然存在。
亮度930的性能 Dimensity 930的性能低于 骁龙778G中的 三星Galaxy XCover 6 Pro，特别是在Geekbench的多分数中，联发科SoC在这个价格范围内得分很弱。这同样适用于2014年发布的图形单元。IMG BXM-8-256甚至无法跟上高通公司的中端GPU--Adreno 642L。 Adreno 642L在GFXBench中提供几乎两倍于Cat S75的速率。
| Antutu v9 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 2056989, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (394141 - 430895, n=2) | |
| CAT S75 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 26863, n=192, last 2 years) | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 () | |
| CrossMark - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2044, n=160, last 2 years) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (606 - 612, n=2) | |
| CAT S75 | |
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 75143, n=146, last 2 years) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (5039 - 5507, n=2) | |
| CAT S75 | |
| AImark - Score v3.x | |
| Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=138, last 2 years) | |
| CAT S75 | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (877 - 953, n=2) | |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| CAT S75 | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| CAT S75 | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| CAT S75 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
| CAT S75 | |
| CAT S53 | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| CAT S53 | |
| CAT S75 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
| CAT S53 | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| CAT S75 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| CAT S75 | |
| CAT S53 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| CAT S53 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| CAT S75 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| CAT S53 | |
| CAT S75 | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| CAT S53 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| CAT S75 | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| CAT S75 | |
| CAT S53 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
| CAT S53 | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| CAT S75 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| CAT S75 | |
| CAT S53 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| CAT S53 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| CAT S75 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| CAT S75 | |
| CAT S53 | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| CAT S53 | |
| CAT S75 | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (64.7 - 77.1, n=2) | |
| CAT S75 (Chrome 114) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chome 104) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (44.1 - 58.4, n=2) | |
| CAT S75 (Chrome 114) | |
| WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=155, last 2 years) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (69 - 86, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104) | |
| CAT S75 (Chrome 114) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (93 - 110, n=2) | |
| CAT S75 (Chromee 114) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (20342 - 26766, n=2) | |
| Gigaset GX6 (Chrome 107) | |
| CAT S75 (Chrome 114) | |
| CAT S53 (Chrome 112) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| CAT S75 (Chrome 114) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (1466 - 1986, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| CAT S75 | CAT S53 | Gigaset GX6 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -50% | -37% | -24% | -25% | 53% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 991.21 | 510.9 -48% | 953.5 -4% | 841.6 -15% | 728 ? -27% | 1863 ? 88% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 878.23 | 208.2 -76% | 454.7 -48% | 484.7 -45% | 527 ? -40% | 1446 ? 65% |
| Random Read 4KB | 221.56 | 140.7 -36% | 194.9 -12% | 170.6 -23% | 191.7 ? -13% | 278 ? 25% |
| Random Write 4KB | 233.91 | 141.4 -40% | 39.9 -83% | 204.2 -13% | 185.8 ? -21% | 309 ? 32% |
游戏--Cat S75管理120 fps
我们使用GameBench应用程序检查Cat S75的图形性能和来自Play Store的三个Android 游戏。我们的第一个测试游戏，PUBG Mobile，只能在中等细节（HD）下玩--UHD设置是不可选择的。这款射击游戏的渲染速度为30帧/秒，在最低的细节设置下可以达到40帧/秒。
要求不高的游戏，如《死亡扳机2》，以120帧的速度接近原生帧率运行。然而，竞技场射击游戏Armajet显示出较大的波动，帧率严重下降到30帧以下。
排放 - 户外电话保持凉爽
温度
在我们的稳定性测试场景中，Cat S75的机箱几乎没有升温--我们只在背部测量到37.2℃的峰值。3DMark的压力测试并不支持 联发科SoC因此，我们无法为这台户外手机提供测试。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.7 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
卡特彼勒公司的这款坚固的手机依靠两个扬声器，其音量超过85分贝。我们的测量结果显示，Cat S75的中音和高音的频率响应相当线性。然而，在声音画面中没有出现低频。还可通过USB-C端口和蓝牙5.1提供有线或无线耳机解决方案。
CAT S75 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Gigaset GX6 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命--带无线充电的Cat S75
消耗功率
Cat S75的电池容量为5000毫安时，可以选择通过USB-C或无线方式充电--两者的功率都高达15瓦。对于户外手机来说，其耗电量并不明显。
| Off / Standby |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Idle |  1.1 / 1.5 / 1.9 Watt |
| Load |
3.2 / 5.2 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| CAT S75 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro 4050 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -15% | -7% | -32% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.1 | 0.9 18% | 0.9 ? 18% | 0.885 ? 20% |
| Idle Average * | 1.5 | 1.4 7% | 1.35 ? 10% | 1.451 ? 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.9 | 1.8 5% | 1.85 ? 3% | 1.608 ? 15% |
| Load Average * | 3.2 | 4.7 -47% | 4 ? -25% | 6.55 ? -105% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.2 | 8.1 -56% | 7.45 ? -43% | 9.92 ? -91% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
在我们的WLAN测试中，调整后的显示亮度为150cd/m2，Cat S75持续了大约15个小时，即使是重度用户在户外使用时也应该没有问题。
| CAT S75 5000 mAh | CAT S53 5500 mAh | Gigaset GX6 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro 4050 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 896 | 1135 27% | 1002 12% | 768 -14% |
Pros
Cons
判决书
Cat S75是一款强大的智能手机，凭借其卫星通信支持在竞争中脱颖而出。通过安装的联发科芯片使用开放的3GPP-NTN标准使用卫星服务的可能性，价格略低于600欧元（约600美元），但需要付费包月才能使用全部功能。
然而，那些对卡特彼勒的户外手机感兴趣的人应该知道，这一功能和高水平的耐用性必须享有较高的个人优先权，因为在许多领域，Cat S75的操作技术水平相当于廉价的中档手机（显示屏和光学系统甚至更糟）。
对于那些远离文明的人来说，尽管Cat S75在硬件上有缺陷，但它是一个有趣的技术作品。
如果你正在为建筑工地或野外旅行寻找一个强大的手机，但对卫星支持不感兴趣，你会发现一个很好的解决方案，三星Galaxy XCover 6 Pro 或Gigaset GX6 - 耐用的替代品，设计更现代，可更换电池。
CAT S75
- 05/11/2023 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
