专为高收入者打造的高端商务二合一本：惠普EliteBook X Flip G1i评测
多花 500 到 1000 美元是为了什么？
惠普改变了命名方案，使其能够为新款 14 英寸商务二合一电脑收取高额溢价。我们来看看 EliteBook X Flip G1i 与它的前身 Elite x360 1040 G11 2 合 1 相比有哪些优势。Christian Hintze, 👁 Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
评价--非常出色但价格昂贵的商务二合一设备
惠普 EliteBook X Flip G1i 是一款非常出色的商务二合一电脑。它坚固耐用，相对小巧便携，拥有出色的输入设备，在任何情况下都非常安静，而且电池续航时间长。对于商务人士来说，它配备了各种安全功能，如专用安全芯片、安全套件和眼球跟踪功能，以保护用户免受不速之客的围观。
最重要的批评可能是价格。约 2600 美元的价格相当高昂，尤其是它的前代产品便宜了近 1000 美元！除了 CPU 之外，其他方面几乎没有变化；设计保持不变，设备的 Wi-Fi 7、5G、500 万像素网络摄像头和良好的电池续航能力也可以在 EliteBook X360.CPU 性能更高，但噪音也更大。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
在撰写评论时，惠普 EliteBook X Flip G1i 目前在亚马逊上还没有销售。
我们的 HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 是全新 G1i 的二合一版本，是继 惠普Elite x360 1040 G11二合一笔记本的脚步。这是惠普高端商务二合一系列的名称，这款 360 度笔记本电脑主要面向公司、商务客户、内容创作者等。
规格
外壳和功能 - Elite 镁合金
这款银色的亮丽机壳与前代产品外观相似，由镁合金制成，可媲美 戴尔 Pro 13 Premium.在我们的扭转测试中，事实证明底座甚至显示屏都相对稳定。不过，360 度铰链可以再紧一些。
底部面板仅用四颗螺丝固定。在机身内部，可以看到电池、风扇、可更换的 Wi-Fi 模块和固态硬盘。内存不可扩展。
虽然缺少 LAN 插槽和 SD 读卡器，但机身上有三个 USB-C 端口，其中两个是 USB 4/Thunderbolt 4。
500 万像素网络摄像头采用物理快门，支持 470 万像素图像和 1440p 视频，其余像素用于自动取景等。
可持续性
封面含有 75% 的可回收金属。包装百分之百采用可持续来源，并可回收利用。
输入设备 - EliteBook 提供安静的打字环境
由于机身小巧，安静的按键显得又大又圆（1.7平方毫米），而且间距稍大。所有方向键和 F 键的高度均减半。
键程为中短，但按压点明显，反馈良好。
触摸板尺寸约为 12 x 8.5 厘米，干燥时触感光滑，潮湿时则不太光滑。按键安静舒适，手感柔软，但仍能提供清晰的反馈。
触摸显示屏上的输入可以高效可靠地转换，此外，您还可以使用附带的触控笔。
显示屏 - Flip 的触摸屏包括 Sure(No)View
所有四种显示屏均采用 60 Hz、1200p 面板，并带有触摸功能。不同之处在于亮度（400 尼特与 800 尼特）和覆盖层。
我们的评测机型采用了惠普 Sure View 5 隐私屏幕，其设计目的是让外部观众更难看到屏幕内容。这种滤镜相当恼人，但幸运的是，惠普现在提供不带 Sure View 的选择。
由于采用了特殊的覆盖层，平均亮度为 541 尼特。不过，亮度仅为 78%，并不是特别均匀。尽管如此，令人愉悦的低黑度确保了良好的对比度。
PWM 不存在，sRGB 几乎完全覆盖，AdobeRGB 和 Display P3 仍在 75% 左右。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 78 %
Center on Battery: 572 cd/m²
Contrast: 2860:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.19 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86, calibrated: 2.11
ΔE Greyscale 5.65 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
78.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
76.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI AUO8FB5, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 CMN1474, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 LEN140WQUXGA, OLED, 3840x2400, 14", 60 Hz | Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 BOE NV140WU, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 NV140WUM-N41 (BOE0C63), IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Samsung SDC41AA, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -6% | 19% | -0% | -46% | 19% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 76.7 | 69 -10% | 99.9 30% | 76.5 0% | 39.1 -49% | 99.8 30% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.2 | 99.2 1% | 100 2% | 100 2% | 57.9 -41% | 100 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 78.2 | 71.1 -9% | 98.5 26% | 76 -3% | 40.5 -48% | 96.7 24% |
| Response Times | -22% | 96% | 17% | 31% | 97% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 49.2 ? | 54.5 ? -11% | 1.72 ? 97% | 35.65 ? 28% | 28.8 ? 41% | 0.86 ? 98% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24.8 ? | 32.7 ? -32% | 1.39 ? 94% | 23.35 ? 6% | 19.7 ? 21% | 1.01 ? 96% |
| PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 469 ? | ||||
| PWM Amplitude * | 60 | 33.3 | ||||
| Screen | 10% | 14% | 3% | -47% | 36% | |
| Brightness middle | 572 | 351.3 -39% | 367 -36% | 333 -42% | 357 -38% | 363.9 -36% |
| Brightness | 541 | 328 -39% | 370 -32% | 326 -40% | 344 -36% | 366 -32% |
| Brightness Distribution | 78 | 86 10% | 98 26% | 85 9% | 87 12% | 99 27% |
| Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.24 -20% | 0.27 -35% | 0.26 -30% | ||
| Contrast | 2860 | 1464 -49% | 1233 -57% | 1373 -52% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.19 | 2.29 45% | 2.9 31% | 2.46 41% | 6 -43% | 0.84 80% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.65 | 4.55 47% | 5.2 40% | 4.58 47% | 22.87 -164% | 2.72 69% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.11 | 0.49 77% | 2 5% | 1.31 38% | 4.46 -111% | 0.82 61% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.65 | 2.2 61% | 2.2 61% | 2.1 63% | 3.5 38% | 1.1 81% |
| Gamma | 2.45 90% | 2.13 103% | 2.19 100% | 2.2 100% | 1.992 110% | 2.18 101% |
| CCT | 5959 109% | 6321 103% | 6150 106% | 6578 99% | 6585 99% | 6330 103% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
2% | 43% /
29% | 7% /
4% | -21% /
-36% | 51% /
42% |
* ... smaller is better
开箱后，DeltaE 值并不理想，但我们的校准大大减少了偏差。不过，ColorChecker 中的 DeltaE 值仍然不够理想。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 49.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8437 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
有了 Sure View 过滤器，在户外时确保正确的开启角度就显得更加重要。否则，您很快就会发现很难看到任何东西。
性能 - GPU 性能强大，CPU 性能较弱
处理器选项包括 Core Ultra 5 226V到 Ultra 7 268V以及两者之间的所有产品。我们的 超 7 258V代表了第三好的配置，增加了 32 GB 集成内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘。
EliteBook X Flip G1i 非常注重安全性，主要面向企业和商务人士。
测试条件
MyHP 是一个控制中心，提供两个性能配置文件和各种其他设置。惠普还在 Windows 中创建了自己的能源配置文件。在进行基准测试时，我们将一切都保留为默认设置。
处理器
超 7 258V 超 7 258V 的4 个 E 核和 4 个 P 核，主频介于 2.2 GHz 和 4.8 GHz 之间。此外，还集成了 iGPU Arc 140V，这是一个拥有 47 TOPS 和 32 GB 内存的 NPU。
在 Cinebench R15 循环中，首次运行后性能立即下降了约 10%，但之后保持不变。
相比之下，CPU 性能比你所期望的 超 7 258V.在单核任务中，性能下降幅度可以忽略不计，但在多核应用中，性能下降幅度高达 6% 至 11%！例如，在所有测试中，同样配置的 联想 Yoga 9 14享有约 12% 的优势。
在电池模式下，CPU 性能损失不到 7%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | |
| Dell Pro 13 Premium PA13250 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Pro 13 Premium PA13250 | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
系统性能
在 PCMark 10 中，该系统的表现符合预期，但在 CrossMark 中，它再次落后于平均水平，这次落后了约 7%。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6265 - 7314, n=15) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Dell Pro 13 Premium PA13250 | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (3229 - 9125, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6931 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (107682 - 114336, n=15) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Dell Pro 13 Premium PA13250 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Average of class Convertible (29473 - 158525, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
即使启动 LatencyMon，我们也能观察到延迟水平。在打开浏览器和随后打开多个标签页时，这些延迟水平都会增加。我们播放的 4K/60fps YouTube 视频没有出现任何掉帧现象。相比之下，最终的延迟值并不过高。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| Dell Pro 13 Premium PA13250 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
1 TB M2 2280 固态硬盘的连续读取性能非常高且稳定。遗憾的是，在所有测试中，性能都与竞争对手有一定差距。测试结果模棱两可：DiskSpd 报告称，该存储设备的读取速度较弱，但写入速度不错，而 AS SSD 的情况似乎恰恰相反。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
iGPU 英特尔弧形图形处理器 140ViGPU 负责 3D 应用。它在合成基准测试中遥遥领先，比 Arc 140V 的平均性能高出 5%。在电池供电情况下，我们没有发现 GPU 性能有任何下降（Fire Strike ）。
游戏性能也很强劲，仅在 CPU 密集型游戏（如X-Plane 11.11）中稍有落后。目前的游戏通常可以在中低分辨率和细节下流畅运行。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 12318 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 33560 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9145 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4404 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 814 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 136 | 139.9 | 50.6 | 27.3 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 103 | 72.3 | 84.8 | 82 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 85.9 | 49.4 | 34.2 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 47.8 | 38.5 | 31.9 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 234 | 86.5 | 71.9 | 59.6 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 47 | 35.9 | 31.8 | 31.3 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 40.7 | 37.6 | 33.4 | 29.2 |
排放与能源 - EliteBook 非常安静
噪音排放
空载运行时，两个风扇都处于关闭状态。在最大 31.65 dBE 的情况下，即使在负载情况下，系统也不会发出很大的声音。负载一段时间后，系统会很快安静下来。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 23 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 27.14 / 31.65 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) | ||
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-1T00-1006 | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 165H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G | Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N | Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U, Micron 2550 512GB | Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 115U, Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-A0 | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Dell Pro 13 Premium PA13250 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 268V, Micron 2550 1TB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -16% | -18% | -13% | -30% | -7% | -15% | |
| off / environment * | 23 | 23 -0% | 24.5 -7% | 23.03 -0% | 25 -9% | 22.9 -0% | 23 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23 | 23 -0% | 24.5 -7% | 23.53 -2% | 25 -9% | 23.2 -1% | 23 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 23 | 23 -0% | 24.5 -7% | 23.53 -2% | 28 -22% | 23.2 -1% | 23 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23 | 23 -0% | 24.5 -7% | 23.53 -2% | 29 -26% | 23.2 -1% | 23 -0% |
| Load Average * | 27.14 | 31 -14% | 30.4 -12% | 38.54 -42% | 37 -36% | 27.8 -2% | 37 -36% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 31.65 | 45.7 -44% | 44.9 -42% | 38.2 -21% | 47 -48% | 33.6 -6% | 42.74 -35% |
| Load Maximum * | 31.65 | 47.7 -51% | 44.9 -42% | 38.21 -21% | 51 -61% | 43.4 -37% | 42.74 -35% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在压力作用下，右侧的两个风扇显然靠得太近，而左侧的风扇则更热。这是 戴尔 Pro 13 Premium在均匀散热方面树立了良好的榜样。在底部，我们测得的热点温度高达 42°C，而其他区域则保持在 35°C。一些竞争对手的温度更高。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the class Convertible.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (0 °C / 0 F).
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 Intel Core Ultra 5 115U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Dell Pro 13 Premium PA13250 Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -2% | -7% | -12% | 3% | 14% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 36 | 38.4 -7% | 41.2 -14% | 41 -14% | 35.8 1% | 31 14% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 41 | 46.8 -14% | 45 -10% | 47 -15% | 37.6 8% | 31 24% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 26 | 24.8 5% | 27.2 -5% | 27 -4% | 25.2 3% | 24 8% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27 | 25 7% | 26.2 3% | 31 -15% | 26.6 1% | 24 11% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
惠普安装了四个立体声扬声器。这使得扬声器的音量在同类产品中非常大，甚至还带有一丝低音。音频接口可用于模拟设备。
HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
总体而言，最大亮度下的闲置功耗可能会更低。不过，在负载情况下，EliteBook X 的表现相当经济。
我们只测得了高达 70 W 的短暂峰值，但即使在压力测试中，平均功耗也只有 46 W，而在《赛博朋克 2077》中，功耗达到了 42 W。
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.6 Watt |
| Idle | 2.9 / 8.2 / 8.6 Watt |
| Load |
39.6 / 70 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core | Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core | Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 Ultra 5 115U, Graphics 4-Core | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Dell Pro 13 Premium PA13250 Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 7% | -11% | 12% | 0% | -4% | 22% | -18% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.9 | 1.8 38% | 5.4 -86% | 2.23 23% | 5 -72% | 3 -3% | 2 31% | 4.79 ? -65% |
| Idle Average * | 8.2 | 4.4 46% | 7 15% | 5.36 35% | 6 27% | 4.4 46% | 4.3 48% | 7.59 ? 7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.6 | 4.5 48% | 7.5 13% | 6.8 21% | 9 -5% | 9.4 -9% | 4.75 45% | 10.2 ? -19% |
| Load Average * | 39.6 | 40.7 -3% | 37.8 5% | 51.2 -29% | 32 19% | 42.3 -7% | 40 -1% | 45.7 ? -15% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 41.9 | 56.5 -35% | 44 -5% | 29.5 30% | 34.4 18% | 51.1 -22% | 36.4 13% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 36.4 | 54.6 -50% | 47.2 -30% | 34.6 5% | 32 12% | 49.9 -37% | 38 -4% | |
| Load Maximum * | 70 | 66 6% | 61.5 12% | 69.9 -0% | 67 4% | 65 7% | 57 19% | 67.6 ? 3% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
在亮度降低的情况下，EliteBook X Flip 的 Wi-Fi 测试时间超过 18 小时，视频测试时间为 20.5 小时。在亮度全开的情况下，前者大幅下降到 8.5 小时。68 Wh 的电池容量也大于同类产品。只有 戴尔 Pro 13 Premium的续航时间更长。
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 68 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core, 68 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 75 Wh | Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, 57 Wh | Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 Ultra 5 115U, Graphics 4-Core, 50 Wh | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 64 Wh | Dell Pro 13 Premium PA13250 Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V, 60 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -18% | -17% | -40% | -32% | -24% | 26% | -27% | |
| H.264 | 1234 | 964 -22% | 741 -40% | 1425 15% | 898 ? -27% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 1102 | 969 -12% | 824 -25% | 660 -40% | 748 -32% | 837 -24% | 1440 31% | 654 ? -41% |
| Load | 128 | 99 -23% | 124 -3% | 170 33% | 112.1 ? -12% | |||
| Reader / Idle | 3353 | 1402 ? |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
惠普 EliteBook X Flip G1i 几乎具备了小型企业二合一电脑的所有优点：运行安静、电池寿命长、输入设备出色、可选 5G、快速 Wi-Fi 7 和众多安全功能，这些只是其中的几个优点。但昂贵的价格却抵消了这些优点！
HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI
- 03/28/2025 v8
Christian Hintze
Total Sustainability Score: Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 89.9%  | HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: $2,004.08 List Price: 2889 Euro | 1.5 kg | 14.7 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
2. 88.8%  | Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 2199€ | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 3840x2400 323 PPI OLED |
3. 87.7%  | Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,795.00 List Price: 2279 USD | 1.5 kg | 17.1 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
4. 78.3%  | Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 Intel Core Ultra 5 115U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 800 EUR | 1.6 kg | 21.1 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
5. 88.7%  | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,641.24 List Price: 1250 USD | 1.3 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
6. 90%  | Dell Pro 13 Premium PA13250 Intel Core Ultra 7 268V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 2700 Euro | 1.1 kg | 17.2 mm | 13.30" 1920x1200 170 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
