联想 Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 评测--高端敞篷车因 4K OLED 显示屏疲软而受挫
月牙湖带来了更长的运行时间。
联想新推出的 Yoga 9 14 2in1 是面向消费者的可转换旗舰产品，除了配备高分辨率 4K OLED 显示屏外，还采用了最新的英特尔 Lunar Lake 处理器，电池续航时间比以前更长。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
评语：Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 有一些改进，但 4K 触摸屏性能较弱
新款联想 Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 是一款出色的可折叠笔记本电脑，采用了坚固耐用的高品质铝制外壳，此外，它还采用了英特尔的 Lunar Lake 处理器，风扇更安静，效率更高，电池运行时间更长。不过，联想本可以选择一款新的箭湖 H 处理器，这对笔记本电脑的多核性能尤其有帮助。总体而言，Yoga 的系统性能仍然非常出色，而且由于其快速的 iGPU，Yoga 甚至适用于零星的游戏会话。
它的输入设备还算不错，但我们还是注意到了与 ThinkPad 键盘之间的差距，而且它的点击板还有待改进。附带的手写笔即使在做长篇笔记时使用起来也很舒适，它还可以通过磁力吸附在机壳上。笔记本电脑的音响系统与铰链中的模块令人印象深刻，其 M.2-2242 固态硬盘可以更换。除此之外，它的维护选项非常有限（内存和 WLAN 都是焊接上去的）。
它改用 4K 屏幕，解决了前代 2.8K 面板机型画面颗粒感的问题，但分辨率终究不是万能的。它的画质并不差，但作为一款昂贵的旗舰级可转换设备，我们希望它能有高于 60 Hz 的频率，以及相应准确的 P3 和 sRGB 色彩配置文件。用户也无法选择在 sRGB 空间中工作，屏幕的色彩偏差也不是最佳的（即使在校准之后）。因此，总的来说，4K 面板并不是编辑图像/视频的最佳选择。在这方面，华硕 华硕 Zenbook Duo更胜一筹。
Pros
Cons
- $1,379.00Lenovo Yoga 9i 2-in-1 Laptop with Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Processor,14” 2.8K (2880 x 1800), OLED, Touch, Display, 16GB RAM, 1TB SSD, Slim Pen, FP Reader, 5MP RGB+IR Cam, Low Blue Light, and Win 11Pro
- $689.00Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2-in-1 AI PC Laptop 14" WUXGA IPS Touch (Glossy) Intel 12-core Ultra 5 125U Processor (Beats i7-1335U) 16GB RAM 512GB SSD Backlit Fingerprint Thunderbolt4 Win11 Gray + HDMI Cable
Yoga 9 14 2in1 是联想面向个人用户推出的可折叠旗舰产品，去年，它被换上了全新的外壳。对于目前的 G10 机型，制造商现在依赖于英特尔更高效的 Lunar Lake 处理器。我们的测试设备是 83LC000PGE 变体，售价 1734.99 美元。除了配备 酷睿至尊 7 258V32 GB 内存外，还配备了 1 TB SSD、主动式手写笔和前面提到的 4K OLED 触摸屏。
规格
外壳 - Yoga 9 采用铝制外壳
与前代产品相比，该机型的铝制外壳未作任何改动 与前代产品相比.侧面抛光的圆形底座仍然略大于屏幕盖，视觉效果不一定是最好的，但这种设计看起来比 Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10（评测即将发布）质量更高。我们的灰色测试设备不像蓝色版本那么容易沾染指纹，蓝色版本也仍在销售。
我们注意到它的制造质量和稳定性都没有问题，底座和盖子都非常坚固。大铰链还兼具扬声器的功能，在视觉上非常抢眼，铰链本身的调节也非常出色。调整盖子角度时，摇晃幅度很小，单手即可打开。另一方面，摄像头驼峰看起来不是特别好，但至少有助于打开盖子。作为一款敞篷机，屏幕当然可以完全折叠起来。
竞争对手的尺寸都非常接近，但 Yoga 9 的重量只有 1.3 千克多一点，是最轻的机型之一。65 瓦的电源又重了 325 克。
连接性 - Copilot+ 和 Wi-Fi 7
得益于 Lunar Lake 处理器的 NPU，Yoga 被归类为 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑，支持 Windows 的所有高级人工智能功能。在连接性方面没有任何变化：它采用 Thunderbolt 4 技术，可以双面充电，但仍然缺少 HDMI 输出和读卡器。
交流
安装的英特尔 BE201 模块支持 Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 5.4。在我们的测试过程中，它与华硕路由器的传输速率非常好且稳定。我们还注意到信号质量没有任何问题。
| Networking | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
网络摄像头
笔记本电脑的 500 万像素网络摄像头（包括用于面部识别的红外传感器和机械盖）保持不变，而且还支持网络摄像头的 Studio 效果。最重要的是，它的图像清晰度要好于常见的 200 万像素模块。
维护
底盖可以拆卸，但由于背面胶粘橡胶支架下有两颗隐藏的螺丝，拆卸起来非常困难。内存和 WLAN 模块都无法更换。因此，维护工作仅限于清洁风扇，必要时还可以更换 M.2-2242 固态硬盘和旋入式电池。
可持续性
Yoga 9 14 通过了多项环保认证（如能源之星、碳中性、EPEAT Gold），但联想没有提供任何关于该设备二氧化碳排放量或所用回收材料比例的信息。该产品的包装可以完全回收利用，而且还提供了维护手册。
输入设备 - 包括联想超薄笔
背光键盘（可通过传感器自动选择）具有精确的压力点和足够的键程（约 1.4-1.5 毫米）。总的来说，Yoga 的键盘输入感觉很舒适，但还达不到 ThinkPad 键盘的质量。键盘右侧还有一列特殊按键，但我们不确定这些按键会有多大用处。右下方的指纹传感器很容易与右方向键混淆，而声音模式是否真的需要单独的按键也值得怀疑。专门的屏幕上下键肯定会更有用。
该设备的点击板尺寸为 13.5 x 8 厘米，大小适中，玻璃表面光滑漂亮。点击板的下部区域可以进行机械点击，但声音有点大，因此比较廉价。当然，你也可以使用电容式触摸屏，联想超薄笔（4096 级压力，可通过 USB-C 充电）也包含在笔记本的供货范围内。与 ThinkPad L13 2in1不同的是，这支笔不能收纳在笔盒中，但至少可以通过磁力吸附在笔盖上。不过，当把它放进包里携带时，这就没什么用了。笔的形状让人联想到普通的钢笔，因此你可以很舒适地长时间书写。触摸屏的手感也不错，即使是细小的动作也能清晰捕捉。
显示屏 - 4K OLED，60 Hz
老款 G9 机型的 2.8K OLED 显示屏画面颗粒感很重，而现在的 4K 触摸屏（3840 x 2400 像素，16:10）则不会出现这种情况。从主观上看，它的画质非常好，黑色深邃，色彩鲜艳，但其频率只有 60 赫兹，在移动过程中会明显感觉到。不过，它的响应速度还是非常快，而且我们没有发现背光出血现象，尽管它确实存在 PWM 闪烁。在 85-50% 的范围内，它使用 60 Hz 的直流调光，振幅较小，但在此范围以下，我们测得的是 240 Hz 的传统 PWM 闪烁（可能更有问题）。屏幕亮度可通过传感器自动调节，但色温却无法调节。
虽然由于黑度较低，最大对比度非常出色，但 OLED 面板在亮度方面的表现也不尽如人意。在 SDR 模式下，我们注意到最大亮度为 370 cd/m²，而在 HDR 模式下，屏幕的最大亮度略低于 575 cd/m²。不过，我们对比组中的其他可转换屏幕也存在这个问题。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 367 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88, calibrated: 2
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
98.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 LEN140WQUXGA, OLED, 3840x2400, 14", 60 Hz | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 LEN140WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Samsung SDC41AA, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -5% | -55% | -1% | -0% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 98.4 -2% | 38 -62% | 99.8 0% | 99.8 0% | 99.9 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.8 0% | 56 -44% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.5 | 86.7 -12% | 39.3 -60% | 96.7 -2% | 97.3 -1% | 94.8 -4% |
| Response Times | 38% | -1366% | 57% | 27% | -384% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.72 ? | 1.51 ? 12% | 29 ? -1586% | 0.86 ? 50% | 0.8 ? 53% | 10.8 ? -528% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 1.39 ? | 1.36 ? 2% | 17.3 ? -1145% | 1.01 ? 27% | 1 ? 28% | 9.37 ? -574% |
| PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 480 ? 100% | 469 ? 95% | 240.5 ? 0% | 120 ? -50% | |
| Screen | 16% | -106% | 32% | -15% | 2% | |
| Brightness middle | 367 | 359 -2% | 313.6 -15% | 363.9 -1% | 371.6 1% | 366 0% |
| Brightness | 370 | 362 -2% | 301 -19% | 366 -1% | 373 1% | 368 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 98 0% | 91 -7% | 99 1% | 99 1% | 98 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 1.2 59% | 6.79 -134% | 0.84 71% | 4.91 -69% | 2.74 6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.2 | 3.2 38% | 22.76 -338% | 2.72 48% | 8.33 -60% | 4.37 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2 | 3.53 -77% | 0.82 59% | 1.59 20% | 1.48 26% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 2.1 5% | 5.6 -155% | 1.1 50% | 2.2 -0% | 3 -36% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.13 103% | 2.18 101% | 2.25 98% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6150 106% | 6433 101% | 6050 107% | 6330 103% | 6120 106% | 6146 106% |
| Contrast | 1161 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 16% /
17% | -509% /
-304% | 29% /
31% | 4% /
-2% | -128% /
-88% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件对面板进行了分析，由于联想没有向用户提供任何色彩配置文件，我们只能使用 P3 色彩空间。它的出厂校准足以满足日常使用，但其色彩偏差部分超过了 3 的重要限制。在执行我们自己的校准（可在上面免费下载配置文件）后，我们主要校正了色温，但无法控制所有色彩偏差。因此，尽管 4K OLED 屏幕的色彩空间覆盖率不错，但它只适合在有限的范围内编辑图像/视频。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.75 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.64 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.72 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.82 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 60 % | ≤ 85 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 85 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8553 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在户外，笔记本电脑闪亮的显示屏成为一个问题，尤其是在非常明亮的日子里，会有很多反光。不过值得庆幸的是，它的视角稳定性非常好。
性能 - 配备 32GB 内存的 Lunar Lake 处理器
Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 配备了英特尔的 Lunar Lake CPU，有 16 或 32 GB 内存（LPDDR5x-8533，板载）。不提供专用 GPU。
测试条件
联想提供了三种不同的能源配置文件（省电模式、智能散热、最高性能），它们也与 Windows 配置文件相关联。我们使用最高性能模式运行基准测试，以获得测试设备的最佳性能。不过，在日常使用中，您可以轻松使用其他两种模式之一，并从更安静的风扇中获益。
| 配置文件 | TDP | CB R23 Multi | Time Spy 图形 | 赛博朋克 2077 1080p 高 | 最大风扇噪音排放 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 省电模式 | 25/19 瓦 | 8,020 点 | 3,739 点 | 23.4fps | 32.7 dB(A) |
| 智能冷却 | 37/24 瓦 | 10,164 点 | 4,140 点 | 33.4fps | 35.6 dB(A) |
| 最高性能 | 37/30 瓦 | 11,023 点 | 4,130 点 | 33.9fps | 44.9 dB(A) |
处理器 - Core Ultra 7 258V
全新 Lunar Lake 处理器 酷睿至尊 7 258V在设计上明显比前代型号中的旧版流星湖芯片更高效。因此，其 37/30 瓦的最大功耗限制比以前（67/39 瓦）明显降低，再加上 CPU 内核数量减少，其多核性能也比以前弱。但反过来，它仍然更加稳定。笔记本电脑的单核性能较好，总体而言，其性能可以轻松胜任日常任务。不过，考虑到其散热问题，如果采用功耗相当的 Arrow Lake H 芯片也会很合适。在电池模式下，设备的性能保持稳定。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (2949 - 29063, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9114 - 11097, n=12) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1664 - 1947, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (914 - 2163, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (1124 - 11357, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (3530 - 4314, n=12) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (643 - 749, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible (348 - 827, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (478 - 4830, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1550 - 1656, n=12) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (258 - 298, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 317, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Average of class Convertible (107 - 1051, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (315 - 414, n=12) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (12977 - 121368, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (32198 - 36724, n=12) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (5547 - 5869, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6540, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (10730 - 11334, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible (2291 - 21269, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (2673 - 2795, n=12) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (1003 - 2978, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9330 - 9864, n=12) | |
| Average of class Convertible (2188 - 22023, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1943 - 2046, n=12) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (806 - 2275, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (10.5 - 14.2, n=12) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible (3.43 - 36.2, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (42.7 - 84.3, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (41.1 - 59.3, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Average of class Convertible (0.3985 - 0.84, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (0.4457 - 0.4715, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (2179 - 64158, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9215 - 12781, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (48758 - 63401, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (11392 - 183760, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (797 - 8151, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (2271 - 2817, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (22413 - 145339, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (49510 - 49818, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (1120 - 29155, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4103 - 4440, n=12) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (25361 - 33565, n=12) | |
| Average of class Convertible (5749 - 97193, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (21774 - 169089, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (37728 - 40753, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (218 - 2001, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (499 - 632, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4891 - 6930, n=12) | |
| Average of class Convertible (1169 - 34297, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (51323 - 54971, n=12) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (13761 - 81626, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
系统性能
Yoga 的系统基准测试结果非常好，从主观上讲，它是一款速度超快的笔记本电脑。在测试过程中，我们没有遇到任何稳定性问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6265 - 7314, n=12) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible (3229 - 9125, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (7233 - 12005, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9295 - 11467, n=12) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (7357 - 9619, n=12) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (5062 - 10800, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9724 - 10026, n=12) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (2496 - 16551, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1623 - 1742, n=11) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible (524 - 2274, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1558 - 1684, n=11) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (554 - 1925, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1846 - 1977, n=11) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (550 - 2949, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1251 - 1411, n=11) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (381 - 1868, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (219 - 314, n=10) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (171 - 426, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (207 - 291, n=12) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (91.2 - 317, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (407 - 1089, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (468 - 559, n=11) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7219 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (107682 - 109035, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (29473 - 158525, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (82846 - 89417, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average of class Convertible (28905 - 126517, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (112837 - 117935, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (30110 - 216896, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (7.7 - 173, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (95 - 101.1, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准延迟测试（上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时没有受到任何限制。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备安装了 1 TB 版本的 SK hynix PVC10，用户首次启动设备后可使用 887 GB。这款紧凑型 M.2-2242 固态硬盘（PCIe-4.0-x4）的传输速率超过 6 GB/s，即使在连续负载的情况下也能保持稳定。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
弧形图形 Arc Graphics 140V是一款快速集成显卡，可以轻松应对日常任务，包括播放高分辨率视频。在合成基准测试中，它比老式的 弧形显卡的优势约为 15%，完全可以在这款设备上玩现代游戏。赛博朋克 2077》和《博德之门 3》都能以 1080p 和中等分辨率流畅运行。您还可以使用 XeSS 升频技术，包括帧生成技术，只要您玩的游戏支持这种技术。 月湖 iGPU 的分析中进行了介绍。.无论是在电池供电还是长时间负载的情况下，GPU 的性能都能保持稳定。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 12218 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9045 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4466 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 820 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 3278 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 3277 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Average of class Convertible (163 - 2067, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (509 - 700, n=15) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
| Average of class Convertible (208 - 423, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (210 - 368, n=7) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (8.2 - 83.5, n=34, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (7.55 - 114.3, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 151.8 | 153 | 71.6 | 27.3 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 101.9 | 86.4 | 73.8 | 93 | 49.3 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 86.6 | 46.4 | 35 | 26.6 | 15.9 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 50.2 | 38.9 | 35.3 | 24.6 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 107 | 63 | 58 | 52 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 247 | 87 | 72.9 | 60.4 | 48.1 | 25.2 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 38 | 30.9 | 27.3 | 25.9 | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 49.1 | 38.7 | 33.9 | 29.9 | ||
| F1 24 (2024) | 95.9 | 85.4 | 66.4 | 21.2 |
排放 - 优秀的扬声器
噪音排放
在日常使用中，Yoga 是一款令人印象深刻的安静伴侣，只要你不需要 CPU 的最高性能，我们建议你使用性能较弱的模式。不过，在这种情况下，风扇的声音会变得非常大，在我们的测试中最高达到了 44.9 dB(A)，考虑到其 30 瓦的 TDP，这个声音实在是太大了。我们的测试设备没有发出其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24.5 / 24.5 / 24.5 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 30.4 / 44.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.5 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNV512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | -4% | 8% | -1% | 2% | |
| off / environment * | 24.5 | 23.6 4% | 24.5 -0% | 22.9 7% | 23.2 5% | 21.38 13% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.5 | 23.6 4% | 24.7 -1% | 23.2 5% | 23.6 4% | 25.18 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 24.5 | 23.6 4% | 24.7 -1% | 23.2 5% | 23.6 4% | 25.18 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24.5 | 23.6 4% | 24.7 -1% | 23.2 5% | 25 -2% | 25.18 -3% |
| Load Average * | 30.4 | 39.8 -31% | 42.7 -40% | 27.8 9% | 34.8 -14% | 34.37 -13% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 44.9 | 39.8 11% | 40.1 11% | 33.6 25% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 44.9 | 39.8 11% | 42.4 6% | 43.4 3% | 46.2 -3% | 34.38 23% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.7 | 37 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在空闲模式和执行简单任务时，笔记本电脑的铝制外壳都能保持良好的散热效果，即使在满载情况下也没有问题。在测试过程中，我们只在底部后部中间区域发现了一个热点，温度为 46 °C。我们注意到的其他数值要低得多。尤其是键盘区域，最高温度为 37 °C。在综合 CPU/GPU 负载的压力测试中，SoC 在最初的 37 瓦后稳定在 30 瓦，然后保持稳定在这一水平。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the class Convertible.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.4 °C / 79.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+1.6 °C / 2.9 F).
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 1% | -2% | 5% | -17% | -9% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 38.4 | 35.3 8% | 38.8 -1% | 35.8 7% | 40 -4% | 39.4 -3% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 46.8 | 47.2 -1% | 43 8% | 37.6 20% | 43 8% | 45.2 3% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 24.8 | 24.8 -0% | 26.4 -6% | 25.2 -2% | 32 -29% | 29 -17% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25 | 26.2 -5% | 27.2 -9% | 26.6 -6% | 35.2 -41% | 29.4 -18% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
笔记本电脑的音响系统总共由四个模块组成（2 个高音扬声器、2 个低音扬声器，每个 2 瓦），效果非常好。根据我们的分析，当前机型的表现也略优于前代机型。两个模块位于底座前部，另外两个模块位于 "声霸 "或铰链中，可将声音直接传到用户。
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 改进运行时间
耗电量
尽管屏幕分辨率更高，但配备了 Lunar Lake 处理器的全新 Yoga 9 14 在闲置模式下所需的电量比其前代产品更少。 前代产品.我们在全亮度下测得的最大功率为 7.5 瓦。在负载情况下，其功耗限制也明显降低。在压力测试中，最大功耗为 61.5 瓦，而在短时间后，我们测得的功耗仍为 53 瓦，因此附带的 65 瓦电源完全够用，即使在峰值负载时，笔记本电脑的电池也无需使用。
| Off / Standby | 0.2 / 0.52 Watt |
| Idle | 5.4 / 7 / 7.5 Watt |
| Load |
37.8 / 61.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N, OLED, 3840x2400, 14" | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, , IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNV512G, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -11% | -6% | 2% | -23% | 26% | 8% | -14% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.4 | 4.1 24% | 4.1 24% | 3 44% | 4.2 22% | 3.54 34% | 3.71 ? 31% | 4.88 ? 10% |
| Idle Average * | 7 | 8.2 -17% | 6.8 3% | 4.4 37% | 7.1 -1% | 4.66 33% | 5.81 ? 17% | 7.74 ? -11% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.5 | 8.7 -16% | 7.4 1% | 9.4 -25% | 12.9 -72% | 6.38 15% | 7.5 ? -0% | 10.4 ? -39% |
| Load Average * | 37.8 | 56.7 -50% | 50.4 -33% | 42.3 -12% | 58.9 -56% | 28.2 25% | 40.3 ? -7% | 45.6 ? -21% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 44 | 48.7 -11% | 53.4 -21% | 51.1 -16% | ||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 47.2 | 47 -0% | 50.4 -7% | 49.9 -6% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 61.5 | 65.1 -6% | 66.6 -8% | 65 -6% | 66.7 -8% | 46.9 24% | 62 ? -1% | 67.6 ? -10% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.5 | 27.4 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
该设备的电池容量保持不变，仍为 75 Wh，但续航时间明显比以前更长。在 150 cd/m²（相当于我们测试设备最大 SDR 亮度的 70%）的 Wi-Fi 测试中，我们记录了 13:44 小时，比旧的 G9 型号.在全亮度条件下，无线局域网测试仍然持续了 09:28 小时，视频测试甚至超过了 16 小时。总体而言，这些结果都非常不错。在最糟糕的情况下，电池在 2 小时内就耗尽了。在设备开启的情况下，充满电需要 108 分钟（约 70 分钟后达到 80%）。
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 75 Wh | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T, 75 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 71 Wh | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 64 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 59 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -7% | 0% | 2% | -26% | -22% | -15% | |
| H.264 | 964 | 1015 5% | 810 -16% | 853 ? -12% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 824 | 667 -19% | 821 0% | 837 2% | 600 -27% | 605 -27% | 620 ? -25% |
| Load | 124 | 93 -25% | 112.6 ? -9% |
Notebookcheck 总评分
Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10
- 03/19/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 88.8%  | Lenovo Yoga 9 14 2in1 G10 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,939.00 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Yo... 2. $1,379.00 Lenovo Yoga 9i 2-in-1 Laptop... 3. $689.00 Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2-in-1 AI P... List Price: 2199€ | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 3840x2400 323 PPI OLED |
2. 86.5%  | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,699.00 List Price: 2099€ | 1.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
3. 83.4%  | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: $899.00 List Price: 820 USD | 1.6 kg | 16.64 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
4. 88.7%  | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,641.24 List Price: 1250 USD | 1.3 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
5. 90.5% v7 (old)  | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,599.00 List Price: 1550 USD | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
6. 89.2%  | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Intel Core Ultra 5 125U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $699.98 List Price: 1140 USD | 1.4 kg | 17.5 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
