惠普 Elite x360 1040 G11 二合一笔记本评测:适合商务人士使用
自从我们 上一次评测 14 英寸 Elite x360 1040 二合一系列已经过去三年了。以来发生了很多变化。最新的 Elite x360 1040 2-in-1 G11 机型(或称 EliteBook x360 1040 2-in-1 G11)配备了流星湖处理器(Meteor Lake CPU),为人工智能做好了准备,并采用了全新的 16:10 外形尺寸,取代了老旧的 16:9 设计。
我们的评测机配置了最高端的 Core Ultra 7 165H CPU 和最低端的 1200p 60 Hz IPS 触摸屏,零售价约为 1600 美元。其他配置从 Core Ultra 5 135U 到 1800p 120 Hz OLED 触摸屏,零售价超过 2300 美元。除此之外,该产品系列没有独立显卡可供选择。
该领域的竞争对手包括其他旗舰商务可转换产品,如 联想 ThinkPad X1 2 合 1 G9, 戴尔Latitude 9450 2-in-1或 华硕 ExpertBook B3 Flip.该机型还有一个不带 360 度铰链的翻盖版本,简称 EliteBook 1040 G11。
更多惠普评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.2 % | v8 | 08 / 2024 | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core | 1.5 kg | 14.7 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
90.6 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 02 / 2021 | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U i7-10810U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 16.5 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
89.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 R7 7736U, Radeon 680M | 1.5 kg | 18.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 06 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core | 1.3 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.3 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core | 1.6 kg | 16.28 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
85.2 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 02 / 2022 | Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 19.5 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
表壳 - 精巧别致
机箱给人的最佳印象是 Spectre x360 但没有锋利的边缘或抢眼的颜色。低调的单色调是为了更好地融入专业环境。尽管外形轻薄,但其刚性非常出色,只有轻微的扭曲和弯曲,没有明显的吱吱作响。
一直以来,Elite 机型都采用哑光银或亮灰色,而 Elite x360 1040 G11 则采用了比以往更白的色调,称为冰川银,旨在减少指纹堆积。它在这方面的效果很好,尤其是与喜欢深色指纹的 ThinkPad 系列相比,但主要缺点是划痕在较白的惠普产品上往往更明显。
从旧款 G7 设计的 16:9 改为新款 G11 设计的 16:10,意味着重量稍重,占地面积更方正。作为回报,G11 比旧款设计和大多数其他 14 英寸可转换机型更薄一些。
连通性--万事俱备
与 ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 G9 或 ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 9450 等竞争对手相比,惠普的集成端口更多。 Latitude 9450 二合一后者缺少 USB-A 和 HDMI 接口。不过,这里的端口非常密集,因此较粗的线缆或 USB-C 适配器可能会阻塞相邻端口的连接。
交流
英特尔 AX211 标配 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.3 连接,可选择升级到 BE200,以实现 Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 5.4。AX211 配置的传输速率稳定可靠。
可选的广域网连接包括支持 LTE 的高通 9205 或支持 5G 的 HP 5000。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 |
网络摄像头
500 万像素的网络摄像头在几年前还处于平均水平之上,但一些制造商已经迎头赶上,推出了更高分辨率的摄像头。这款 ExpertBook B3 Flip和 ThinkPad X1 2 合 1 G9 分别配备了 1300 万像素和 800 万像素网络摄像头。与此同时,戴尔的许多机型(如Latitude 9450 2 合 1)仍然配备了较模糊的 200 万像素网络摄像头。
红外和物理滑块都是保护隐私的标准配置。
维护
底部面板仅用四颗十字螺丝固定,便于维修。内存是焊接的,而 M.2 2280 SSD、WLAN 和 WAN 模块都是可拆卸的。
可持续性
惠普的键盘采用了低卤素、可回收的渔网,扬声器采用了 30% 的海洋塑料,包装采用了 100% 的可持续材料,而且完全可回收。该机型的蛤壳版(EliteBook 1040 G11)还使用了 90% 的可回收镁和 21% 的可回收食用油。
配件和保修
零售包装盒中还包括一支有源触控笔,以及交流适配器和文件。与大多数 ZBook 机型一样,如果在美国购买,制造商提供三年标准保修。
输入设备 - 仍是同类产品中的佼佼者
键盘
与大多数普通消费类笔记本电脑(如戴尔 XPS)相比,防泼溅键盘的按键反馈更有力,键程更深。 戴尔 XPS戴尔 XPS、联想 ThinkBook 或 Yoga 或惠普Pavilion 系列等大多数普通消费类笔记本电脑的键盘相比,它的按键更坚固,键程更深。不过,惠普 Elite 键盘的敲击声更大、更明显,这也许是为了获得更令人满意的键入体验而付出的代价。
与之前的设计相比,键盘布局发生了变化。包括 Home 键、End 键、PgUp 键和 PgDn 键在内的右列专用辅助键已被移除,并进行了重新设计。
触摸板
点击板比 2021 G7 设计(12 x 8.5 对比起 11.5 x 7 厘米),相对于 14 英寸的屏幕尺寸,带来更宽敞的使用体验。滑动非常流畅,几乎没有粘滞感,而点击时的反馈则出奇地敏锐,而且相对安静。这是我们在亚笔记本上使用过的较好的点击式手写板之一,无需像在 ThinkPad X13.
触摸屏 - 哑光和亮光选项
有以下七种触摸屏可供选择。我们的配置配备了粗体的基本选项:
- 1920 x 1200、IPS、400 尼特、100% sRGB、哑光
- 1920 x 1200,IPS,400 尼特,100% sRGB,亮面,60 赫兹
- 1920 x 1200,IPS,800 尼特,100% sRGB,亮面,Sure View 隐私保护,60 赫兹
- 1920 x 1200,IPS,800 尼特,100% sRGB,亚光,Sure View 隐私模式,60 赫兹
- 1920 x 1200,IPS,1000 尼特,100% sRGB,亚光,Sure View 隐私模式,60 赫兹
- 1920 x 1200,IPS,1000 尼特,100% sRGB,亮面,Sure View 隐私模式,60 赫兹
- 2880 x 1800,OLED,400 尼特,100% DCI-P3,哑光,120 赫兹
需要注意的是,没有面板提供超过 sRGB 的分辨率,而超亮的 800 尼特和 1000 尼特选项则锁定为 Sure View。除非配置 OLED,否则刷新率和分辨率的最大值也分别只有 60 Hz 和 1200p。
我们的奇美面板显示出与三年前的 EliteBook x360 1040 G7 上的京东方面板类似的属性,好坏不一。虽然没有什么特别糟糕的地方,但响应时间仍然很慢,而且奇美液晶面板在整体上无法与提供更宽色彩、更高分辨率、Windows VRR 甚至 HDR 的新型 IPS 面板相提并论。只有最高端的 OLED 配置才能提供这些功能。
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 351.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 1464:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.29 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.49
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.13
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 CMN1474, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U BOE08A3, IPS, 1920x1080, 14", 60 Hz | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 AU Optronics AUOA49A, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE ATNA4ßYK20-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 60 Hz | Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA AU Optronics B140HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 14", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -4% | 7% | 28% | 10% | -42% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 69 | 66.1 -4% | 76.6 11% | 99.9 45% | 80.6 17% | 39.1 -43% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.2 | 95.5 -4% | 100 1% | 100 1% | 100 1% | 58.6 -41% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.1 | 68.1 -4% | 77.4 9% | 97.6 37% | 80.1 13% | 40.4 -43% |
Response Times | 3% | -15% | 99% | -9% | 21% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 54.5 ? | 52.4 ? 4% | 65.6 ? -20% | 0.61 ? 99% | 59.6 ? -9% | 41 ? 25% |
Response Time Black / White * | 32.7 ? | 32 ? 2% | 36 ? -10% | 0.69 ? 98% | 35.6 ? -9% | 27 ? 17% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | |||||
Screen | -57% | 2% | -21% | 4% | -55% | |
Brightness middle | 351.3 | 406.7 16% | 425.9 21% | 412 17% | 501.4 43% | 265 -25% |
Brightness | 328 | 382 16% | 405 23% | 411 25% | 491 50% | 247 -25% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 88 2% | 87 1% | 98 14% | 88 2% | 88 2% |
Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.28 -17% | 0.26 -8% | 0.32 -33% | 0.14 42% | |
Contrast | 1464 | 1453 -1% | 1638 12% | 1567 7% | 1893 29% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.29 | 3.74 -63% | 2.81 -23% | 1.9 17% | 2.52 -10% | 5.09 -122% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.55 | 5.92 -30% | 4.91 -8% | 3.9 14% | 4.87 -7% | 19.84 -336% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.49 | 2.18 -345% | 0.49 -0% | 1.9 -288% | 0.45 8% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 4.3 -95% | 2.2 -0% | 1 55% | 2.8 -27% | 2.33 -6% |
Gamma | 2.13 103% | 2.19 100% | 2.04 108% | 2.21 100% | 2.17 101% | 2.42 91% |
CCT | 6321 103% | 6781 96% | 6688 97% | 6361 102% | 6270 104% | 6344 102% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.6 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95.1 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -19% /
-37% | -2% /
1% | 35% /
11% | 2% /
3% | -25% /
-40% |
* ... smaller is better
该显示器根据 sRGB 标准校准良好,平均灰度和色彩 DeltaE 值分别为 2.2 和 2.29。使用我们的 X-Rite 色度计对显示器进行进一步校准后,这些值将分别降至 0.6 和 0.49。用户可以免费下载并应用我们上述的 ICM 配置文件,以进一步提高显示效果。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
32.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.1 ms rise | |
↘ 16.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
54.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.4 ms rise | |
↘ 30.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
由于磨砂面板能很好地减少眩光,因此在阴凉处的室外能见度还不错。不过,它的亮度仍不足以克服较亮的环境条件,更不用说阳光直射了。如果用户对室外可见度有较高要求,不妨考虑 800 尼特或 1000 尼特选项。
性能 - 在小型机箱中实现苛刻的 Core Ultra H 性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 和 MyHP 设置为性能模式。
处理器
相对于小巧的外形,CPU 性能非常快。与 酷睿 i7-10810U和三年前的 EliteBook x360 141040 G7 中的酷睿 i7-10810U 以及我们的 酷睿至尊 7 165H甚至一直优于 酷睿至尊 9 185H的性能。尽管如此,Turbo Boost 的性能仍然有限,如下图所示,在循环运行 CineBench R15 xT 时,性能几乎立即下降了 22%。如果采用更强的散热解决方案,同样的酷睿 Ultra 7 处理器可能会因此获得更高的性能。
降级到非 vPro 酷睿至尊 7 155H预计不会对性能产生任何重大影响,而降级到 酷睿至尊 5 125H或 Core Ultra 5 135U预计多线程性能将分别降低约 15% 和 35%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H (10658 - 14235, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H (56664 - 75077, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H (2608 - 3473, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H (82058 - 86192, n=3) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H (8232 - 9798, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H (27301 - 36957, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H (56077 - 73297, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H (742 - 1018, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H (5580 - 7521, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H (44396 - 48762, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA |
压力测试
在性能模式下运行 Prime95 时,CPU 会提升到 3.4 GHz(有效时钟频率)和 66 W,持续时间只有几秒钟,核心温度也会飙升到 106 C。不过,这个温度仍然非常高,尤其是与 Latitude 9450 二合一相比,9450 2-in-1 中的酷睿 Ultra 7 165U 在类似测试条件下的稳定温度仅为 76 摄氏度。很明显,如果采用更大或更有效的散热解决方案,惠普的酷睿 7165H 确实会受益匪浅。
如下截图所示,在智能感知模式而非性能模式下运行 Prime95,时钟频率和封装功耗将分别降至 1 GHz 和 22 W。作为回报,风扇噪音明显变小,核心温度降至 73 摄氏度。
在性能模式下运行《赛博朋克 2077》等高负载时,核心温度仍高达 95 摄氏度。 框架笔记本 13.5也会稳定在较低的温度,而我们已经认为该系统的温度高于平均水平。
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 54 |
Prime95 压力(智能感应模式) | 1.0 | -- | 73 |
Prime95 压力(性能模式) | 2.8 | -- | 96 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.0 | 1300 | 88 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 0.5 | 1800 | 95 |
系统性能
在采用集成显卡的 14 英寸商务可转换机中,PCMark 分数是最高的。这主要归功于我们的 Core-H CPU,因为该尺寸类别中的大多数竞争对手都采用了速度较慢的 Core-U CPU。我们的惠普还得益于速度更快的 Arc 8 图形处理器,而 Meteor Lake Core-U CPU 只能使用 Arc 4。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU () | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU () | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU () | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1690 - 1872, n=2) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU () | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU () | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU () | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU () | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU () | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU () |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6983 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H (72539 - 88831, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H (73908 - 87187, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H (72057 - 75839, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165H (120.8 - 145.6, n=3) | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
LatencyMon 显示,在打开我们主页的多个标签页时存在 DPC 问题。在其他方面,以 60 FPS 播放 4K 视频也非常完美,没有掉帧记录。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配有 Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512GPCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘,传输速率高达 7000 MB/s。不过,如下图所示,这一最高传输速率只能维持约一分钟,然后就会降至 4500 MB/s。尽管如此,它的性能仍比旧款 EliteBook 1040 G10 中的三星 MZ9L4512HBLU 快。 EliteBook 1040 G10.
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
弧形 Arc 8是英特尔迄今为止速度最快的集成显卡解决方案,因为它比 Iris Xe或古老的 UHD 620系列相比有了巨大的提升。不过,它与竞争对手 Radeon 780M差不多。请注意,降级到酷睿至尊 5-H 也会将 GPU 从 Arc 8 降级到 弧 7但根据我们使用联想 IdeaPad IMP2 的情况,性能差距预计仅为 5%。 联想 IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9.
电源配置文件 | 图形分数 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 8961 | 23924 | 3386 |
平衡模式 | 9068 (-0%) | 22365 (-7%) | 3203 (-5%) |
电池电量 | 9100 (-0%) | 22825 (-5%) | 3356 (-1%) |
在平衡模式而非性能模式下运行会影响 CPU 性能,这与我们在上述两种模式下的功耗观察结果一致。除此之外,图形性能在性能模式、平衡模式和电池模式下保持不变。
3DMark 11 Performance | 12471 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 31963 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8369 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3807 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 674 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
与采用相同集成 Arc 8 图形处理器的其他笔记本电脑相比,游戏性能几乎总是略低于平均水平。这可能是因为上文提到的核心温度过高,限制了系统的 Turbo Boost 潜力。
与《赛博朋克 2077》相比,《赛博朋克 2077》的空闲帧率更不稳定。 框架笔记本 13.5相比,运行在相同集成 GPU 上的框架笔记本 13.5 的帧速率会更不稳定。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 -1! | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 -1! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA -1! | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U -3! |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U |
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12) | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (77.4 - 96.1, n=11) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (44.9 - 54.6, n=11) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (35.3 - 45, n=11) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (24.7 - 31.6, n=11) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (20.2 - 25.9, n=11) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Dell Latitude 7440 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 162.9 | 151.9 | 43.2 | 17.1 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 100.3 | 94 | 77.9 | 74.4 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 73.6 | 40.3 | 27.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 58.7 | 47.6 | 40.5 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 51 | 36 | 34 | 32 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 178 | 77.4 | 61.7 | 47.3 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 49 | 39.5 | 27 | 21.9 |
F1 22 (2022) | 71 | 57.5 | 43.5 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 29.3 | 24.2 | 21.4 | 20.4 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 31.5 | 25.7 | 23.9 | 21.6 |
排放 - 大部分时间保持安静
系统噪音
散热解决方案相当小巧,尤其是短热管。根据惠普的说法,较短的热导管能比较长的热导管更快地排出 CPU 中的热量。当然,这也是以降低效能为代价的,因为较小和较轻的散热解决方案的散热效果不如较大的散热解决方案。上文提到的核心温度过高就是这种方法的后果。
无论如何,由于风扇对转速变化的反应较慢,因此在运行浏览器或视频等负载要求不高的负载时,系统一般都很安静。事实上,在运行中低负荷时,它是最安静的子笔记本之一。
风扇噪音上限在 "智能感应"(又称 "平衡")和 "性能 "模式下有所不同。如果设置为 "智能感应 "模式,运行《赛博朋克 2077》时风扇噪音最高仅为 38 dB(A),而在 "性能 "模式下为 45.7 dB(A)。正如上文压力测试部分所指出的,处理器性能会因此受到影响。长时间运行苛刻负载时的最大风扇噪音实际上高于 14 英寸便携式计算机的平均噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 23 dB(A) |
Load |
| 31 / 47.7 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 165H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 Radeon 680M, R7 7736U, PSEIB512GABBMC0 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02 | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U | Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -3% | 4% | -15% | -5% | -17% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 25.2 -10% | 23 -0% | 24.5 -7% | 23.9 -4% | 25 -9% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 25.2 -10% | 23 -0% | 24.5 -7% | 23.9 -4% | 25 -9% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 25.2 -10% | 23 -0% | 28 -22% | 23.9 -4% | 25 -9% |
Idle Maximum * | 23 | 25.2 -10% | 23 -0% | 29.8 -30% | 23.9 -4% | 32.3 -40% |
Load Average * | 31 | 30 3% | 27.8 10% | 41.7 -35% | 36.4 -17% | 44.1 -42% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 45.7 | |||||
Load Maximum * | 47.7 | 38.1 20% | 40.3 16% | 41.7 13% | 44.7 6% | 44.1 8% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.6 | 41.7 | 44.7 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
键盘中心的表面温度较高,长时间运行高负载时,热点温度可达 38 摄氏度以上。打字或在平板模式下操作设备时,温度会明显升高,但不会达到令人不舒服的程度。平均温度与Latitude 9450 2 合 1 相似,但比 ThinkPad X1 二合一 G9.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+0.8 °C / 1.4 F).
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U Intel Core i7-10810U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, AMD Radeon 680M | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -4% | 7% | -0% | 2% | -15% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39 | 36.6 6% | 38.6 1% | 42.9 -10% | 35.4 9% | 43.6 -12% |
Maximum Bottom * | 43.6 | 46.2 -6% | 42.8 2% | 43.6 -0% | 37.8 13% | 55.4 -27% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.4 | 25.8 -6% | 22.2 9% | 24.4 -0% | 27.2 -11% | 28.1 -15% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.4 | 29.8 -9% | 23.6 14% | 24.9 9% | 28.2 -3% | 28.4 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
总体功耗与我们在 2021 机型上记录的功耗非常接近,证明了四代英特尔 CPU 每瓦性能的提升。例如,Elite x360 1040 G11 的游戏功耗约为 55 瓦,而 Elite x360 1040 G7 的功耗为 40 瓦,尽管我们的更新机型提供了 4 至 6 倍的图形性能。
当 CPU 的利用率达到 100%时,我们可以记录到 65 W USB-C 交流适配器(约 9.7 x 5.3 x 2.2 厘米)的最大功耗为 66 W。如下截图所示,由于散热原因,这一耗电量只是暂时的。需要注意的是,如果同时为系统充电,游戏等高负载已经需要 55 W 的交流适配器,这将导致充电速度变慢。幸运的是,惠普提供了更大的可选 100 W USB-C 交流适配器来解决这个问题。
Off / Standby | 0.36 / 0.57 Watt |
Idle | 1.8 / 4.4 / 4.5 Watt |
Load |
40.7 / 66 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U i7-10810U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 R7 7736U, Radeon 680M, PSEIB512GABBMC0, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, , IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -3% | -31% | -115% | -61% | -49% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.8 | 1.6 11% | 3.2 -78% | 7.3 -306% | 3.2 -78% | 4.1 -128% |
Idle Average * | 4.4 | 4.5 -2% | 5.4 -23% | 10.1 -130% | 6.4 -45% | 6.9 -57% |
Idle Maximum * | 4.5 | 5.2 -16% | 5.6 -24% | 10.4 -131% | 10.8 -140% | 7.4 -64% |
Load Average * | 40.7 | 41.7 -2% | 42.2 -4% | 45.7 -12% | 54.6 -34% | 39.8 2% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 54.6 | |||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 56.5 | |||||
Load Maximum * | 66 | 70.8 -7% | 82 -24% | 64.1 3% | 70.2 -6% | 66 -0% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 60 | 35.2 | 35.5 | 39.7 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
电池容量实际上小于三年前的 EliteBook x360 1040 G7(68 Wh 对 79 Wh),再加上要求更高的 Core-H CPU,整体运行时间减少了几个小时。即便如此,实际 WLAN 浏览时间仍然超过 16 小时,比 Dragonfly Pro 2023 或 ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 G9 都要长。对于一款搭载 Core-H 处理器的笔记本电脑来说,这样的成绩确实令人印象深刻。
从空电到满电大约需要 90 分钟,这在同类产品中属于平均水平。
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core, 68 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7, i7-10810U i7-10810U, UHD Graphics 620, 78.6 Wh | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 R7 7736U, Radeon 680M, 65 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, 57 Wh | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, 60 Wh | Asus ExpertBook B3 Flip B3402FEA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 50 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 88% | -6% | -29% | -11% | -53% | |
Reader / Idle | 3353 | 3768 12% | 1393 -58% | 1300 -61% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 969 | 1128 16% | 777 -20% | 509 -47% | 815 -16% | 460 -53% |
Load | 99 | 334 237% | 158 60% | 89 -10% | 143 44% | |
H.264 | 540 |
Pros
Cons
评语 - 同尺寸、同级别产品中极具吸引力的功能
Elite x360 1040 G11 与 ThinkPad X1 2 合 1 G9 相比,性能更快,连接选项更多。 ThinkPad X1 二合一 G9或 Latitude 9450 二合一.其酷睿Ultra 7-H处理器和超亮亚光触摸屏选项有助于将该系统与同类亚笔记本转换器区分开来,在亚笔记本转换器中,光面和较慢的酷睿U处理器非常常见。
在如此轻薄的机身中装入如此多的配置也有一些缺点。例如,Core Ultra 7-H CPU 在我们的设备中运行时温度很高,风扇的最大噪音也高于同尺寸级别中的大多数其他产品。与采用相同处理器的大型笔记本电脑相比,CPU 和 GPU 性能会受到影响。固态硬盘在负载情况下同样会出现节流现象,而端口之间的距离则非常近。六款 IPS 显示屏也有点令人失望,因为所有显示屏都仅限于 FHD+ 和 60 Hz;只有一款 OLED 显示屏同时提供更高的分辨率和刷新率。
Elite x360 1040 G11 2 合 1 在多功能性和可用功能方面表现出色。不过,小巧的散热解决方案在与要求苛刻的酷睿-H 处理器选件相匹配时有些困难。
对于大多数人来说,该机型的多功能性大于其缺点,因为只有追求性能的人才会注意到它的节流问题。目标商业用户仍然会喜欢惠普系统的便携性和所有功能。
价格和供应情况
惠普现已推出Elite x360 1040 G11 2 合 1 机型,酷睿 Ultra 5 配置的起价为 1520 美元。
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
- 08/17/2024 v8
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.