GeForce MX450正在落伍。华硕ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U敞篷车评测
华硕Zenbook系列是该制造商的高端消费笔记本电脑型号的所在地,与中低端的Vivobook系列形成对比。这家制造商是最早通过其产品提供英特尔A370M GPU的厂商之一。ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD例如,去年该制造商是第一个通过其ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD提供英特尔A370M GPU的厂商。
我们这里的评测单位是2022年的ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U,它与上述2022年的ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD是完全不同的型号。只有一两个SKU可用,我们的具体配置是Zen 2 AMD Ryzen 7 5700U CPU、GeForce MX450 GPU、8GB内存和1080p IPS显示屏,零售价约850美元。值得注意的是,它是少数由AMD+Nvidia硬件驱动的15.6英寸可转换笔记本电脑之一。
这一领域的竞争者包括其他中高端的15.6英寸可转换笔记本,如三星Galaxy Book Pro 360 15, HP Envy x360 15或 幽灵x360 15系列,或 戴尔 Inspiron 15 7506二合一.
更多华硕评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
81.1 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U R7 5700U, GeForce MX450 | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
88 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD i7-12700H, A370M | 1.8 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 2880x1620 | |
86.8 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx R7 5825U, Vega 8 | 1.9 kg | 18.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.6 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 11 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81.2 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2021 | Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.8 kg | 17.94 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.5 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.7 kg | 19.1 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳--对于ZenBook来说很乏味
与最近的ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD的铬切割蓝色设计相比,哑光的灰色设计并不令人振奋,但机箱的刚性从上到下都保持良好。机盖和底座都表现出最小的扭曲和弯曲,铰链在各个角度上也感觉很硬。当向键盘或外盖中心施压时,会有一点翘曲,但这并不是什么大问题。
也许我们对机箱最大的批评与闪亮的铬合金铰链和后角有关。它们起初看起来不错,因为它们与骨架的其他部分形成了鲜明的对比,但它们在大多数表面上很容易被刮伤,特别是当盖子打开时它们会与桌子接触。
该系统比市场上大多数其他15.6英寸的可折叠电脑略重且厚,部分原因是其独立的Nvidia GPU。一个极端的例子是三星Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 它的重量轻了半公斤,薄了9毫米,明显更便于携带。即使是华硕自己的ZenBook Flip 15 Q539,配备了更快的CPU和GPU选项,仍然比我们的Q508U更轻更薄。
连接性 - 没有显示端口或电源传输
端口选项与戴尔Inspiron 15 7506二合一产品类似,但有一些注意事项,对我们的华硕不利。首先,其USB-C端口不支持Thunderbolt、Power Delivery,甚至不支持DisplayPort。其次,HDMI端口只有1.4,意味着不支持60赫兹的4K外部显示器。相比之下,大多数预算和中档转换设备都支持USB的DP。
SD卡阅读器
集成的MicroSD读卡器比ZenBook Flip 15 Q539Z上的慢得多。将1GB的图片从我们的UHS-II测试卡移到桌面上需要30多秒,而Q539机型上的时间还不到一半。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
沟通
没有对Wi-Fi 6E的支持可能是为了节省成本。Wi-Fi 6的性能可能会更快,因为平均传输速率比预期的要慢,只有618 Mb/s,而这几乎是戴尔Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1上的两倍。戴尔Inspiron 15 7506 2合1.
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx |
网络摄像头
网络摄像头是典型的低端100万像素或720p传感器,常见于许多预算和中档笔记本电脑。不幸的是,没有相机快门,但有红外支持。
维护
底部面板由十个飞利浦螺丝固定,其中四个隐藏在橡胶脚下。像惠普这样的其他制造商已经不再使用隐藏的螺丝,以使维修更容易,所以看到华硕坚持这样一个对用户不友好的设计是令人沮丧的。
一旦进入内部,用户只能升级M.2 2280 PCIe SSD,因为内存和WLAN模块是焊接的。相比之下,戴尔Inspiron 15 7506二合一产品和HP Envy x360 15都有可拆卸的内存。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件外,零售盒中没有其他额外的东西。如果在美国购买,通常有一年的制造商有限保修。
输入设备 - 体面的键盘,海绵状的点击板
键盘
QWERTY键的反馈几乎和Acer的一样清晰。幽灵x360 16带来了令人满意的打字体验。然而,咔哒声很响,特别是在空格键上。按键布局与ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD完全相同,只是在标签上有细微差别。
触摸板
点击板的尺寸小于戴尔Inspiron 15 7506二合一(10.5 x 7.5 cm vs. 11.5 x 8 cm)。滑动平稳可靠,只有在较慢的速度下才有一点粘性,可以进行更准确的点击和拖放操作。然而,点击时的反馈很浅,而且是海绵状的,感觉不尽人意。不幸的是,Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1和Envy x360 15都有这个特点,所以它不是华硕独有的。
显示器 - 仅限预算型IPS
该模型采用了预算级的京东方IPS面板,没有其他选项可供选择。这不是一个高端面板的致命弱点是其狭窄的色彩空间,仅为sRGB的59%。相比之下,Inspiron 15 7506二合一或惠普Spectre x360 15系列的显示屏的目标是全sRGB覆盖率或更高。
除了令人失望的颜色之外,其他属性,如响应时间、刷新率和亮度,充其量是平均水平,在该类别中没有什么特别之处。我们很想在未来看到一个90赫兹的选项,以获得更流畅的用户体验。毕竟,华硕已经在某些Vivobook机型上提供了它们。
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 328.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 1095:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.23
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
41.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.13
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U BOE CQ NV156FHM-N4L, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD Samsung ATNA56AC01-0, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6" | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx BOE08A8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE SDC4159, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F LG Philips 156WFF, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 Lenovo LEN156FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 119% | -1% | 119% | 67% | -4% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.1 | 99.8 149% | 39.6 -1% | 99.9 149% | 67.4 68% | |
sRGB Coverage | 58.5 | 100 71% | 58.5 0% | 100 71% | 97.2 66% | 59 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.3 | 97.5 136% | 40.9 -1% | 97.6 136% | 68.7 66% | 38 -8% |
Response Times | 98% | 19% | 96% | -5% | 45% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45.2 ? | 0.8 ? 98% | 43.6 ? 4% | 2 ? 96% | 52.4 ? -16% | 29 ? 36% |
Response Time Black / White * | 38.4 ? | 1.1 ? 97% | 25.2 ? 34% | 2 ? 95% | 36 ? 6% | 18 ? 53% |
PWM Frequency | 240.4 ? | 60 | ||||
Screen | 26% | -10% | 74% | -10% | -42% | |
Brightness middle | 328.4 | 340.1 4% | 297.8 -9% | 290 -12% | 289.8 -12% | 376 14% |
Brightness | 307 | 344 12% | 271 -12% | 290 -6% | 274 -11% | 341 11% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 97 14% | 81 -5% | 99 16% | 92 8% | 78 -8% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.35 -17% | 0.05 83% | 0.31 -3% | 0.66 -120% | |
Contrast | 1095 | 851 -22% | 5800 430% | 935 -15% | 570 -48% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.05 | 2.47 51% | 5.16 -2% | 1.84 64% | 3.75 26% | 6.4 -27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.33 | 5.96 67% | 19.76 -8% | 3.83 79% | 7.01 62% | 20.45 -12% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.23 | 2.28 -2% | 2.69 -21% | 1.52 32% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 1.8 5% | 2.2 -16% | 1.24 35% | 5.3 -179% | 4.59 -142% |
Gamma | 2.13 103% | 2.2 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.2 100% | 2.35 94% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 6588 99% | 6346 102% | 6678 97% | 6686 97% | 5810 112% | 6819 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.9 | 38 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97 | 59 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 81% /
64% | 3% /
-4% | 96% /
87% | 17% /
7% | -0% /
-21% |
* ... smaller is better
灰度和色温实际上是相当好的,而颜色本身是不准确的。用我们的X-Rite色度计校准会改善较低饱和度水平的颜色,正如我们下面的CalMAN结果所示,但上面提到的有限色彩空间意味着较高饱和度水平的颜色必须保持不准确。特别是蓝色是测试中最不准确的颜色,因为它看起来更接近于蓝绿色而不是真正的蓝色。
我们建议应用我们上述经过校准的ICM配置文件,以获得更准确的色彩显示。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
45.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.4 ms rise | |
↘ 22.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在大多数白天的户外条件下,300尼特的显示屏亮度不够,无法舒适地观看。眩光是普遍存在的,结果是颜色看起来被洗掉了。大多数15.6英寸笔记本电脑都有这个缺点,包括价格较高的LG Gram 15系列或三星Galaxy Book Pro 360 15。
性能 - AMD Zen 2与GeForce MX
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们通过Windows和MyAsus软件将我们的测试装置设置为性能模式。我们还确保通过Nvidia控制面板将GPU设置为GeForce MX450。建议习惯于使用预装的MyAsus应用程序,因为它是切换特定功能的枢纽,如蓝光强度、电池健康充电、风扇配置文件、颜色等。
处理器
的 锐真7 5700U在我们的华硕设备中,性能比我们数据库中配备相同处理器的普通笔记本电脑快5%到10%。多线程性能明显快于任何英特尔12代或更早的酷睿U系列CPU,同时与12代酷睿P系列持平。然而,正如AMD的传统,单核性能是缺乏的。
性能的可持续性很好,但可以做得更好。例如,在循环运行CineBench R15 xT时,最初的1613分会随着时间的推移下降大约20%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (6.97 - 12.1, n=18) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U | |
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50D-B-115 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F | |
HP ProBook 450 G9 6A180EA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
系统性能
PCMark的结果可与运行在第11代英特尔酷睿U系列CPU上的系统相媲美,如三星Galaxy Book Pro 360 15或戴尔Inspiron 15 7506二合一,而远远落后于华硕ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD及其Arc A370M GPU。它的PCMark 10 Essentials子得分特别低,可能是由于其缓慢的SSD写入速度和单核性能。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (8347 - 10091, n=14) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (7001 - 8457, n=14) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (4583 - 5964, n=14) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (976 - 1183, n=7) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (1048 - 1191, n=7) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (941 - 1197, n=7) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (872 - 1159, n=7) |
PCMark 10 Score | 5105 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (15867 - 39326, n=18) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (17632 - 47190, n=18) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (11554 - 47048, n=18) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (84.9 - 113, n=18) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon揭示了在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签时的DPC问题。此外,在我们长达1分钟的4k 60 FPS测试视频中,我们能够记录到24个跳帧,表明硬件加速和优化不佳。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备--最多只有一个驱动器
我们的测试装置配备了不常见的 256GB金士顿OM8PDP3256BM.2 NVMe固态硬盘,而其他大多数笔记本电脑通常配备三星、美光或东芝的硬盘。不幸的是,这里的金士顿型号是一个预算驱动器,其写入速度很慢,只有~450 MB/s,而大多数PCIe3驱动器的写入速度是2倍或更快。然而,更高容量的SKU可能会配备更快的驱动器。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能--在集成英特尔和AMD选项中失去优势
图形性能可较之以前快30%。 英特尔Iris Xe 96 EUs取决于游戏的情况。尽管GeForce MX和集成选项之间的优势并非微不足道,但现在英特尔和AMD的集成GPU已经有时间成熟,它们的优势已经越来越窄。最新的集成 Radeon 680M例如,最新的集成Radeon 680M可以与独立的GeForce MX450相媲美,甚至在许多游戏中超过了它。Nvidia的GPU仍然比旧的集成GPU有很大的提升。 Radeon RX Vega系列尽管如此,在Ryzen 7 5700U CPU中。
3DMark 11 Performance | 7748 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20887 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4605 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2134 points | |
Help |
Blender | |
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
HP ProBook 450 G9 6A180EA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 () | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx |
* ... smaller is better
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 124.9 | 76.8 | 42.2 | 23.1 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 100.9 | 92.8 | 75.3 | 79.3 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 60.3 | 27.7 | 18 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 49.9 | 60.6 | 50.9 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 124.8 | 47.7 | 36.9 | 26 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 70.8 | 28.6 | 18.3 | 13.2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 30.1 | 21.9 | 11.7 | 7.6 |
排放
系统噪音 - 非常活跃的风扇
在浏览或播放视频时,即使通过MyAsus软件设置为Whisper模式,风扇噪音也通常徘徊在27.6 dB(A)左右,安静的背景为23.3 dB(A)。我们发现,在电池供电的情况下,风扇往往会更频繁地空转,以获得 "更真实 "的耳语模式。由于风扇转速的变化是渐进的,而不是急剧的,所以风扇的脉动并不频繁。
说到转速,风扇达到最高转速并不需要很多时间。例如,当运行3DMark 06的第一个基准场景时,风扇噪音会稳步上升,然后在测试中途稳定在41dB(A)以下。这个结果明显比许多竞争性的15.6英寸可折叠电脑,如惠普Envy x360 15或Galaxy Book Pro 360 15的声音大,后者可以更长时间地安静运行。华硕的高风扇转速敏感度直接归因于dGPU,而大多数转换器通常只配备集成显卡,对冷却的要求较低。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.3 / 27.6 / 27.6 dB(A) |
Load |
| 40.6 / 43.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.3 dB(A) |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U GeForce MX450, R7 5700U, Kingston OM8PDP3256B | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD A370M, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx Vega 8, R7 5825U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ256HAJD | Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 Vega 7, R5 5500U | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 5% | 11% | 4% | -1% | -1% | |
off / environment * | 23.3 | 23 1% | 22.7 3% | 25 -7% | 27.1 -16% | 26 -12% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.3 | 23 1% | 22.7 3% | 25 -7% | 27.1 -16% | 26 -12% |
Idle Average * | 27.6 | 23 17% | 22.7 18% | 25 9% | 27.1 2% | 26 6% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.6 | 24.7 11% | 22.7 18% | 25 9% | 27.1 2% | 26 6% |
Load Average * | 40.6 | 31.7 22% | 23.3 43% | 32.7 19% | 31.5 22% | 42.6 -5% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.5 | 45.2 -12% | 43.4 -7% | 37.4 8% | ||
Load Maximum * | 43.2 | 45.2 -5% | 43.4 -0% | 42 3% | 47.2 -9% | 37.4 13% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
掌托或键盘按键的表面温度不会令人不舒服,因为热点在机箱的后部,皮肤不太可能接触到。如下面的温度图所示,当长时间运行高要求的负载时,最热的区域达到约40℃。相比较而言,机身底部的热点是最热的。戴尔Inspiron 15 7506二合一可以达到46摄氏度以上。
笔记本电脑底部的通风格栅非常狭窄。也许更大的格栅可以进一步改善散热。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.4 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -2% | 4% | -3% | -2% | -5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39.6 | 36.4 8% | 36.2 9% | 42.6 -8% | 35.6 10% | 40.5 -2% |
Maximum Bottom * | 37.8 | 40.4 -7% | 37.8 -0% | 40.8 -8% | 46.8 -24% | 42 -11% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.4 | 26.2 1% | 25.4 4% | 25.9 2% | 23.6 11% | 26.5 -0% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.8 | 29.2 -9% | 26.6 1% | 26.1 3% | 28 -4% | 29 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在启动Prime95压力时,CPU的时钟频率、温度和电路板功耗将分别提升到4.1 GHz、93 C和45 W。然而,仅仅几秒钟之后,时钟频率和功耗就开始下降,最终分别稳定在2.8GHz和20W,以便将核心温度保持在80C的低水平,正如我们下面的截图所示。在惠普Envy x360 15上重复这一测试 HP Envy x360 15使用Ryzen 7 5825U将导致更高的稳定时钟速率和更低的核心温度,分别为3.5 GHz和77 C。
当运行 Witcher 3代表典型的游戏负载时,Nvidia GPU将稳定在825 MHz和70 C。根据WiNFO的数据,其功耗将在10 W和20 W之间,这对于GeForce MX系列是很常见的。
用电池供电运行会影响CPU的性能。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将返回物理和图形分数,分别为7325和7434分,而在主电源上则为12057和7455分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 37 | 38 |
Prime95压力 | 2.8 | -- | 82 | 65 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 1.4 | 825 | 69 | 76 |
Witcher 3 应力 | ~1.1 | 825 | 72 | 71 |
发言人
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
功耗--在集成Radeon 680M上失去优势
如果是游戏,消耗量将在42瓦和54瓦之间,而在46瓦和52瓦之间。联想瑜伽7 14而联想Yoga 7 14采用的是更快的Ryzen 7 6800U和集成Radeon 680M。因此,华硕的每瓦性能明显较差,特别是由于与竞争对手的Radeon 680M相比,Nvidia MX GPU通常表现不佳。采用独立GPU的一个关键优势是其潜在的更快的性能,即使这意味着更高的功耗,但MX450只能勉强跟上AMD的最新集成解决方案。
我们能够从小型(6.4 x 6.4 x 2.8厘米)的65瓦壁挂式交流适配器上记录到当CPU和GPU都处于100%的利用率时,临时的最大消耗为65瓦。这个比率会迅速下降,因为最大的Boost速度在该模型上是不可持续的,正如下面的截图所示。
Off / Standby | 0.27 / 0.32 Watt |
Idle | 3.9 / 7.6 / 11 Watt |
Load |
53.3 / 64.9 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U R7 5700U, GeForce MX450, Kingston OM8PDP3256B, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD i7-12700H, A370M, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6" | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx R7 5825U, Vega 8, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ256HAJD, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 R5 5500U, Vega 7, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -89% | 9% | 15% | 11% | -4% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 9.1 -133% | 3.9 -0% | 4 -3% | 3.7 5% | 5.1 -31% |
Idle Average * | 7.6 | 11.9 -57% | 7.2 5% | 5.6 26% | 7.9 -4% | 8.2 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 11 | 12.4 -13% | 7.3 34% | 10.1 8% | 9.3 15% | 8.7 21% |
Load Average * | 53.3 | 101.3 -90% | 46.7 12% | 34.7 35% | 41 23% | 51.4 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.8 | 85.6 -100% | 41.1 4% | 34.7 19% | 41 4% | 46.3 -8% |
Load Maximum * | 64.9 | 155.7 -140% | 64.8 -0% | 63 3% | 52.2 20% | 64.8 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命 - 实际上并不坏
电池容量只有56Wh,明显小于ZenBook Flip 15 Q539的96Wh电池。即便如此,由于我们的ZenBook Flip 15 Q508配置中的U系列CPU和MX系列GPU要求不高,所以电池寿命并没有缩短。我们能够记录到实际的WLAN运行时间刚刚超过11小时,而ZenBook Flip 15 Q539为9小时。
从空电到满电大约需要2小时。该系统不能通过USB-C充电。
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U R7 5700U, GeForce MX450, 56 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD i7-12700H, A370M, 96 Wh | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx R7 5825U, Vega 8, 51 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 67 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 53 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 R5 5500U, Vega 7, 70 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 3% | -0% | 26% | -14% | 23% | |
Reader / Idle | 1009 | 789 -22% | 1198 19% | 1654 64% | 1127 12% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 664 | 562 -15% | 612 -8% | 679 2% | 499 -25% | 839 26% |
Load | 113 | 164 45% | 100 -12% | 127 12% | 80 -29% | 134 19% |
H.264 | 925 | |||||
Witcher 3 ultra | 110 |
Pros
Cons
评语--更像VivoBook而非ZenBook
华硕的一些最好的消费类笔记本电脑带有Zenbook的名字。然而,ZenBook Flip 15 Q508UG走了太多弯路,成为我们迄今为止测试的最差的Zenbook机型之一。它采用了厚重单调的机箱设计,不支持DisplayPort、Power Delivery、Wi-Fi 6E或全sRGB选项。它的点击板很小,由于有隐藏的螺丝,维修很困难。4K60视频播放过程中的掉帧是不可接受的,在运行高要求的负载时,高亢的风扇噪音很难被忽视。缓慢的NVMe固态硬盘和焊接的内存进一步限制了该系统的多功能性。
Zenbook Flip 15 Q508UG因其结合了Ryzen 7 5700U CPU和GeForce MX450显卡而显得独一无二。不幸的是,它被包裹在一个厚厚的机箱里,缺乏其他大多数中端或更高的笔记本电脑所共有的功能。
该模型有几个积极的方面,但它们被更长的失望清单所掩盖。例如,CPU和GPU性能不错,但AMD较新的Zen 3+和Radeon 680M选项可以做得更好、更有效,而不需要专用的GeForce MX图形芯片。至少铰链是键盘的质量还不错,尽管铬涂层很脆弱,而且键帽和标签之间的对比度很差。
如果你打算花900美元买一台15.6英寸的可折叠机,那么最好考虑一下HP Envy x360 15或戴尔Inspiron 15 7506二合一来代替。这些替代品更精简,可配置性更强,携带更多内存和功能,而不需要牺牲屏幕尺寸。
价格和可用性
华硕Zenbook 15 Q508UG敞篷车现在在百思买发货,价格为869美元。
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U
-
01/20/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.