Honor MagicBook Art 14 笔记本电脑 - 配备蒸发腔和创新摄像头的 OLED 超薄笔记本电脑
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Honor 新推出的 MagicBook Art 14 是一款配备英特尔流星湖处理器(Meteor Lake Processor)的轻型子笔记本电脑。酷睿至尊 7 155H),并配备了高分辨率 OLED 触摸屏,频率高达 120 Hz。在网络摄像头方面,Honor 有了新的突破,它采用了可拆卸模块,不使用时只需将其收进外壳即可。这意味着屏幕边缘可以非常窄。我们的测试设备还提供 32 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD;测试时价格尚未公布。此外,还有配备 16GB RAM 和 1TB SSD 的机型可供选择。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.6 % | v8 | 09/2024 | Honor MagicBook Art 14 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1 kg | 12.9 mm | 14.60" | 3120x2080 | |
86.4 % | v8 | 08/2024 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 1.3 kg | 15 mm | 14.50" | 2944x1840 | |
86.2 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 1.3 kg | 17.5 mm | 13.80" | 2304x1536 | |
89 % | v7 (old) | 06/2024 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | 980 g | 13.5 mm | 14.20" | 3120x2080 | |
87.4 % | v7 (old) | 04/2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.2 kg | 11.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.7 % | v7 (old) | 02/2024 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
90 % | v7 (old) | 08/2023 | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 987 g | 16.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
92.4 % | v7 (old) | 03/2024 | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3, M3 10-Core GPU | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" | 2560x1664 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击 这里可在此处查阅。
外壳 - 高质量镁合金
全新 MagicBook Art 14 是一款非常轻薄的笔记本电脑,仅重 1.013 千克(约 2.23 磅)。从外观上看,新款 MagicBook Art 14 与华为 MateBook X Pro 2024 有很多相似之处。 华为 MateBook X Pro 2024Honor 提供三种不同颜色的设备。除了我们测试的绿色版本外,该笔记本还有白色和灰色版本。从外观上看,绿色版本给人一种非常优雅的印象,令人惊讶的是,略带天鹅绒质感的表面并不特别容易沾染指纹。
Honor 该机使用了一个可连接的网络摄像头(稍后详述),因此显示屏的上边缘非常窄(2.2 毫米/<0.1 英寸),没有恼人的凹槽或摄像头凸起。屏占比高达 91%。顶部边缘有三个用于磁性网络摄像头的小触点。
我们非常喜欢金属外壳(镁合金)的稳定性。即使使用很大的力气,也很难将底座压入或扭转,而且不会发出嘎吱嘎吱的声音。薄薄的屏幕盖要灵活一些,但也没有问题。铰链调节得非常好,调节打开角度(最大 150 度)时,盖子几乎不会晃动。单手就能轻松打开盖子,触摸板上的凹槽使操作更加方便。
尽管 MagicBook 拥有 14.6 英寸显示屏,但其整体非常小巧,最重要的是重量非常轻,仅 1.013 千克(约 2.23 磅)。在对比组中,只有 MateBook X Pro 2024和 LG Gram Style 14略轻(20-30 克/约 0.7-1.1 盎司),但并不明显。在高度方面,只有被动散热的 MacBook Air M3和 Galaxy Book4 Pro 14略微扁平一些。由于采用了大尺寸显示屏,其占地面积本身比大多数竞争对手略大。
功能 - 雷电 4、USB-A 和 HDMI
尽管采用了扁平化设计,但Honor 不仅仅局限于 USB-C 端口,还在右侧配备了一个完整的 HDMI 输出和一个普通的 USB-A 端口。因此,在日常使用中无需使用适配器。左侧有两个 USB-C 端口,前端的一个支持现代的 Thunderbolt 4 标准。与 MateBook X Pro(只有 3x USB-C)相比,我们更喜欢 MagicBook Art 的连接性,即使不能双面充电。没有 SD 读卡器。
交流
Honor MagicBook Art 14 采用英特尔著名的 AX211 WLAN 模块,除了 6 GHz 网络外,还使用蓝牙 5.3。配合华硕的参考路由器,MagicBook Art 14 实现了非常高且稳定的传输速率。在测试过程中,我们在信号质量和大容量下载方面都没有遇到任何问题。
Networking | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
网络摄像头
Honor 我们为网络摄像头设计了一些特别的东西,因为它不是将网络摄像头安装在屏幕的顶部边缘,而是设计成一个可以收纳在外壳中的外置模块。小巧的模块与外壳颜色相同,与 microSD 卡类似,按压模块即可从外壳中拉出。该装置由弹簧加载,给人一种稳固的感觉。网络摄像头本身是用磁铁吸附的,因此不会轻易脱落。
网络摄像头的相应接口位于屏幕盖上。摄像头稳稳地安装在屏幕盖上,不会晃动。网络摄像头的方向也可以改变。不过,配备 1080p 传感器的网络摄像头本身质量一般,考虑到模块相对较大,我们希望能有更大的传感器。此外,网络摄像头不支持工作室特效,这让我们无法理解。不过,我们已经就此与制造商取得了联系。
维护
下机箱盖用 Torx 螺钉固定,很容易拆卸,因为它不同于 MateBook X Pro胶合橡胶脚垫下没有隐藏的螺丝。风扇旁边可以接触到 M.2 2280 固态硬盘,但内存和 WLAN 模块是焊接的。冷却系统采用了特殊设计。这里使用了一个薄薄的蒸气室,它还容纳了 WLAN 连接的天线。
输入设备 - 舒适的键盘和触觉触摸板
尽管外壳很薄,但黑色键盘的键程为 1.5 毫米,是一款非常出色的键盘。按键和反馈都很精确,即使输入长文本也没有任何问题。在这方面,MagicBook 与昂贵的商务笔记本电脑相比毫不逊色。按键音量不大,只有空格键的触发音量较大。键盘布局并不完美(我们指的不是国际版键盘),因为电源键(也包含指纹扫描仪)集成在键盘右上方,因此很容易与删除键混淆。垂直方向键也非常小。白色键盘照明提供两种强度级别,可通过传感器自动激活。
就像 MateBook X Pro一样,全新 MagicBook Art 14 也配备了一块大型触觉触摸板,因此没有任何活动部件。触觉反馈是通过振动电机模拟的,因此你可以在任何位置点击触摸板,并获得一致的反馈。触摸板还支持边缘手势(亮度、音量),这些手势也能通过振动获得触觉反馈。总的来说,操作非常出色。
电容式触摸屏也可用于输入,其运行效果符合预期,没有任何问题。触摸功能也可以通过预装的 PC Manager 快速菜单停用。
显示屏 - 120 Hz OLED
Honor 它采用 14.6 英寸 OLED 屏幕,分辨率为 3:2 格式的 3,020 x 2,080 像素。屏幕边角采用圆角设计,因此有些图标无法完全显示,但实际上应该没有什么限制。触摸屏的反光性很强,在室内也会出现反光问题,但在明亮的表面上不会出现光栅效应,有些 OLED 面板就会出现这种情况。主观画质非常出色,色彩非常鲜艳,黑色浓郁,对比度极高。120 Hz 的频率也确保了动作的流畅性。亮度可通过传感器自动调节,但色温无法调节。
在 SDR 模式下,OLED 面板的平均亮度为 480 cd/m²,在 HDR 模式下最高可达 704 cd/m²(或在几乎全白的画面下为 670 cd/m²)。这些数值明显低于 MateBook X Pro 2024(620 nits SDR,1,200 nits HDR),但仍明显高于三星目前的 OLED 面板(约 400 nits SDR,约 580 nits HDR)。
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 476 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Honor MagicBook Art 14 EDO14.44, OLED, 3120x2080, 14.6", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 LEN145WQ+, OLED, 2944x1840, 14.5", 90 Hz | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ LQ138P1JX61, IPS, 2304x1536, 13.8", 120 Hz | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 VisN236HUZ15, OLED, 3120x2080, 14.2", 120 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 ATNA40CU07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA ATNA40CU06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Samsung SDC417F ATNA40YK10-1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 90 Hz | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | 0% | 4% | -0% | 6% | 4% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 95.9 | 97.3 1% | 97.8 2% | 99.8 4% | 97 1% | 99.8 4% | 99.92 4% | 98.4 3% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 98.2 -2% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.5 | 90.8 5% | 87.3 1% | 94.6 9% | 85.2 -2% | 97.6 13% | 94.71 9% | 87.9 2% |
Response Times | 65% | -4927% | 359% | 8% | 81% | -113% | -5490% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.58 ? | 0.39 ? 33% | 38.9 ? -6607% | 0.75 ? -29% | 0.83 ? -43% | 0.69 ? -19% | 2 ? -245% | 34.5 ? -5848% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.52 ? | 0.71 ? -37% | 17.4 ? -3246% | 0.49 ? 6% | 0.69 ? -33% | 0.71 ? -37% | 2 ? -285% | 27.2 ? -5131% |
PWM Frequency | 120 | 360 ? 200% | 1440 1100% | 240 ? 100% | 480 ? 300% | 350 192% | ||
Screen | -25% | 1% | -26% | -24% | -5% | -84% | -12% | |
Brightness middle | 477 | 472 -1% | 606 27% | 613 29% | 392 -18% | 391 -18% | 384 -19% | 525 10% |
Brightness | 480 | 475 -1% | 592 23% | 624 30% | 398 -17% | 392 -18% | 388 -19% | 506 5% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 97 5% | 94 2% | 93 1% | 97 5% | 98 7% | 97 5% | 92 0% |
Black Level * | 0.43 | 0.02 | 0.054 | 0.42 | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1 | 1.4 -40% | 1.3 -30% | 1.9 -90% | 1.3 -30% | 1.1 -10% | 2.47 -147% | 1.4 -40% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2 | 4.1 -105% | 2.1 -5% | 3.1 -55% | 3.2 -60% | 2.4 -20% | 4.33 -117% | 2.8 -40% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.8 | 1.5 -88% | 2.81 -251% | |||||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 2 -5% | 2.1 -11% | 2.1 -11% | 2.3 -21% | 1.3 32% | 2.63 -38% | 2 -5% |
Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.21 100% | 2.16 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.17 101% | 2.18 101% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6178 105% | 6493 100% | 6842 95% | 6447 101% | 6517 100% | 6336 103% | 6279 104% | 6876 95% |
Contrast | 1409 | 19550 | 7111 | 1250 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 14% /
5% | -1642% /
-895% | 112% /
70% | -5% /
-10% | 27% /
20% | -64% /
-70% | -1833% /
-1004% |
* ... smaller is better
Honor MagicBook Art 14 配备了各种色彩配置文件,我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)对其进行了分析。Native 配置文件默认为激活状态,但色彩有些过度饱和。而P3 配置文件则能非常准确地显示色彩和灰度,只是色温略微偏高。不过,所有偏差都低于 3 的重要限制。
通过我们自己的校准(可在上面免费下载配置文件),我们可以优化色温,进一步减少色彩偏差。此外,Honor 还提供了精确的 sRGB 模式。总之,该面板非常适合编辑图像/视频。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.27 ms rise | |
↘ 0.25 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.3 ms rise | |
↘ 0.28 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz Amplitude: 11 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17271 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
MagicBook Art 14 的显示屏使用 PWM 闪烁或直流调光,频率为 120 Hz,振幅较低,应该不会造成任何问题。
在户外,即使没有阳光照射,高反射触摸屏也会出现反光问题。应避免坐姿后方的光线或明亮表面直接照射。视角稳定性非常好。
性能 - 配备 32GB 内存的 Meteor Lake 处理器
MagicBook Art 14 完全采用英特尔 酷睿至尊 7 155H处理器和 16 或 32 GB LPDDR5x-7467 内存。不提供专用显卡。
测试条件
令人有些意外的是,电脑管理器中并没有额外的能源配置文件。我们在 Windows最佳性能模式下进行了以下基准测试和测量。
处理器 - Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
处理器为英特尔流星湖芯片 酷睿至尊 7 155H,共提供 16 个内核。在 MagicBook Art 14 中,处理器短暂运行时的功耗为 43 瓦,但随后迅速降至 28 瓦。虽然这款超薄笔记本没有创下任何性能记录,但处理器性能完全可以满足大多数日常任务的需要,而且正如我们稍后将看到的,相当保守的功耗限制也对风扇行为产生了积极影响。某些竞争机型的骁龙芯片在原生 CPU 基准测试中提供了更好的性能。
在电池模式下,最大功耗降至 40/26 瓦,这就是多核性能降低 15%的原因。更多 CPU 基准测试 此处.
Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU -9! | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9769 - 19007, n=44) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5902 - 21058, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1496 - 1801, n=44) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1111 - 2001, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3798 - 7409, n=42) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2234 - 8233, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (601 - 696, n=42) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (408 - 790, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1932 - 2858, n=47) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (953 - 3345, n=60, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (99.6 - 268, n=43) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (180 - 307, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (163 - 597, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (178 - 381, n=40) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (41739 - 70074, n=42) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (26799 - 75402, n=51, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4341 - 6403, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5037 - 5621, n=42) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (7732 - 13656, n=47) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6796 - 15059, n=48, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2003 - 3130, n=43, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1901 - 2473, n=44) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9.93 - 21.2, n=42) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6.2 - 21.3, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 98.5, n=53, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40.9 - 79.2, n=41) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 0.77, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.4457 - 0.53, n=41) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=42) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4588 - 32888, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=42) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (20465 - 123315, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=42) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1238 - 5287, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=42) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (47816 - 115682, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=42) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1518 - 18418, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=42) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11546 - 65433, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=42) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (24950 - 161430, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=42) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (406 - 1379, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=42) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1459 - 17495, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=42) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14337 - 53954, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
系统性能
MagicBook Art 14 是一款反应非常灵敏的电脑,在合成基准测试中也取得了不错的成绩。在测试过程中,我们没有遇到系统稳定性方面的问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5159 - 7529, n=29) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7646, n=47, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (9459 - 11289, n=29) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9668 - 11331, n=47, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (7822 - 10591, n=29) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10449, n=47, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (4985 - 10709, n=29) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=47, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=29) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1027 - 1971, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1291 - 1798, n=28) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Average of class Subnotebook (980 - 1875, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=28) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1102 - 2210, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (939 - 1802, n=28) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (958 - 1899, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (225 - 448, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (255 - 299, n=30) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (234 - 309, n=25) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (176.4 - 325, n=51, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (517 - 573, n=31) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 707, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7039 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=42) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22781 - 96791, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=42) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (23831 - 122210, n=53, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=42) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (23474 - 107658, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (120.2 - 233, n=42) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=53, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试(上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,一个驱动程序出现了偏差,但重要的 "中断到进程延迟 "值很低,在使用实时音频应用程序时应该没有限制。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
测试设备中安装了 1 TB 版本的 YMTC PC300,初始启动后可用容量为 853 GB。不过,在Honor 笔记本电脑上仍有两个分区,系统驱动器上只有 235 GB 可用,如果不小心安装或下载,很快就会出现容量问题。剩余的 618 GB 可用于 D 盘。PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘的性能一般,完全可以胜任正常任务,即使在长时间负载的情况下,传输速率也能保持稳定。更多固态硬盘基准测试请参见 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Continuous power reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
图形计算由著名的 英特尔弧形图形处理器它是快速版本,拥有 8 个 Xe 内核,最高时钟频率为 2250 MHz。由于低功耗限制,iGPU 的潜力无法得到充分发挥,但其性能仍然很好,在日常使用中,iGPU 可以顺利完成所有任务(包括播放高分辨率视频)。图形处理器 X1-85 GPU在合成测试(包括 WildLife 或 Steel Nomad Light 等本地测试)中速度较慢。
MagicBook Art 14 还可用于游戏,与 Snapdragon 笔记本电脑不同,不存在兼容性问题。许多较老或要求不高的游戏也能以高细节流畅运行,只有《赛博朋克 2077 》或《博德之门 3》等要求较高的游戏需要将细节降至最低或使用升频。即使在长时间运行和使用电池供电的情况下,GPU 性能也几乎保持不变。更多 GPU 基准测试可在 技术部分.
3DMark 11 Performance | 10713 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7314 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3492 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 742 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2962 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (256 - 1127, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (294 - 692, n=35) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
Average of class Subnotebook (129 - 237, n=3, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8.5 - 44.2, n=50, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 67.5, n=46, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS-Diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
GTA V (2015) | 152.9 | 139.5 | 39.9 | 18.3 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 131 | 80 | 50 | 22.6 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 98.9 | 94.9 | 61.9 | 60.8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 65.3 | 38 | 26.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 53.9 | 38.8 | 31.6 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 56 | 40 | 35 | 32 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 168 | 76 | 59 | 50 |
F1 23 (2023) | 68.2 | 61.2 | 41.1 | 12.1 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 33.7 | 25.6 | 21.7 | 21.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 29.4 | 25.1 | 22.1 | 19.5 |
F1 24 (2024) | 65.6 | 57.1 | 42.7 | 12 |
排放 - 蒸发腔冷却
噪音排放
MagicBook Art 14 使用两个风扇,总体来说非常安静。在主电源运行时,风扇通常保持关闭状态,或者只发出几乎听不到的非常小的噪音。在负载稍重的情况下,噪音通常仍低于 30 dB(A),只有在玩游戏或进行压力测试时,冷却噪音才会增加到 34 或 35 dB(A),但即使在这种情况下,噪音也不会造成干扰。在电池模式下,设备整体上更加安静。总之,MagicBook 得益于处理器相对较低的功耗限制,它不必躲在骁龙处理器竞争对手的后面。我们的测试设备中没有其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24 / 24 / 25.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 28.5 / 35.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | 2% | -16% | -3% | -7% | -9% | ||
off / environment * | 24 | 24.1 -0% | 23.8 1% | 24.8 -3% | 24.5 -2% | 23.4 2% | 25 -4% | |
Idle Minimum * | 24 | 24.1 -0% | 23.8 1% | 24.8 -3% | 24.5 -2% | 23.4 2% | 25 -4% | |
Idle Average * | 24 | 24.1 -0% | 23.8 1% | 29.8 -24% | 24.5 -2% | 23.4 2% | 25 -4% | |
Idle Maximum * | 25.7 | 24.1 6% | 23.8 7% | 29.8 -16% | 24.5 5% | 24.5 5% | 25 3% | |
Load Average * | 28.5 | 25.3 11% | 26 9% | 34 -19% | 32.4 -14% | 39.3 -38% | 37 -30% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 34 | 38.6 -14% | 31.5 7% | |||||
Load Maximum * | 35.2 | 40.5 -15% | 40.3 -14% | 46.8 -33% | 36.7 -4% | 39.3 -12% | 40.62 -15% | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.9 | 36.7 | 35.9 | 37 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
整体温度没有明显的变化。在怠速模式和低负载情况下,机身表面依然凉爽宜人,即使在高负载情况下,我们测得的平均最高温度为 38 °C(100.4 °F)。虽然底部有一个热点,温度为 47 °C(116.6 °F/后部中央区域),但放在大腿上也不会有任何问题。使用键盘时也没有任何限制。在 CPU/GPU 综合负载压力测试中,性能再次迅速下降,CPU 稳定在 22 瓦。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.9 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.7 °C / 87.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.4 °C / -4.4 F).
Honor MagicBook Art 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -5% | 6% | 1% | 8% | 9% | 10% | 13% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44.2 | 44.9 -2% | 47.1 -7% | 43.2 2% | 41 7% | 40.9 7% | 36.3 18% | 44.3 -0% |
Maximum Bottom * | 47.9 | 51.5 -8% | 44.6 7% | 42 12% | 44.2 8% | 46.8 2% | 36.8 23% | 43.4 9% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.7 | 28.9 -4% | 24.7 11% | 29.3 -6% | 25.3 9% | 24.1 13% | 29.2 -5% | 22.3 19% |
Idle Bottom * | 28.2 | 29.4 -4% | 24.5 13% | 29.7 -5% | 26.2 7% | 24.6 13% | 27.4 3% | 22.1 22% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
音响系统总共由 6 个模块组成,但 MagicBook 在这方面稍稍落后于竞争对手。音效绝对不差,但总体而言,它明显比 MateBook X Pro.性能与 Yoga Slim 7x.
Honor MagicBook Art 14 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 合理的电池寿命
能源消耗
尽管 MagicBook Art 14 拥有高亮度和大尺寸面板,但它仍是一款高效的电脑。在全亮度下的空闲模式下,我们测得的最大功率为 8.9 瓦,这是一个不错的结果。在游戏模式下,功耗约为 40 瓦;在压力测试中,短时间内功耗为 66.9 瓦,几秒钟后功耗降至 46 瓦。因此,随附的 65 瓦电源尺寸足够大。
待机模式和关机模式下的功耗并不高,但仍有优化的余地。
Off / Standby | 0.51 / 0.66 Watt |
Idle | 5.1 / 8.4 / 8.9 Watt |
Load |
43.3 / 66.9 Watt |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, YMTC PC300-1TB, OLED, 3120x2080, 14.6" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, OLED, 2944x1840, 14.5" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV, IPS, 2304x1536, 13.8" | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00, OLED, 3120x2080, 14.2" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3, M3 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6" | Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 9% | 32% | -70% | -3% | -16% | 4% | 25% | -17% | -2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.1 | 5.1 -0% | 1.4 73% | 9.3 -82% | 5.7 -12% | 6.1 -20% | 3.58 30% | 1.95 62% | 5.26 ? -3% | 4.67 ? 8% |
Idle Average * | 8.4 | 8.4 -0% | 6.3 25% | 16 -90% | 8.7 -4% | 10 -19% | 7.125 15% | 8.7 -4% | 8.64 ? -3% | 7.96 ? 5% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.9 | 8.6 3% | 7.6 15% | 16.4 -84% | 8.9 -0% | 10.3 -16% | 12.1 -36% | 8.9 -0% | 11.9 ? -34% | 9.92 ? -11% |
Load Average * | 43.3 | 26.1 40% | 26.9 38% | 67.3 -55% | 44.5 -3% | 53.3 -23% | 40.67 6% | 34.3 21% | 53.3 ? -23% | 47 ? -9% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 38.8 | 37.2 4% | 38.5 1% | |||||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 40.7 | 35.3 13% | ||||||||
Load Maximum * | 66.9 | 67.1 -0% | 40.7 39% | 94.3 -41% | 65.2 3% | 67 -0% | 64.2 4% | 35.4 47% | 82.5 ? -23% | 69.9 ? -4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 64.6 | 36.9 | 42 | 28.6 |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
Energy consumption with external Monitor
电池寿命
60 Wh 电池的运行时间总体不错,但比 Snapdragon 竞争产品和 MacBook Air M3.不过,其结果优于 MateBook X Pro的成绩要好,尽管这里安装的是更大的 70 Wh 电池。
在 150 cd/m²(相当于测试设备最大 SDR 亮度的 62%)和 60 Hz 的 WLAN 测试中,我们确定运行时间为 9:36 小时,120 Hz 时为 9 小时。在全亮度条件下,运行时间降至 5:52 小时(60 赫兹)和 5:21 小时(120 赫兹)。在 150 cd/m² 下的视频测试中,我们记录到了 13:52 小时的出色时间,在全亮度下播放 HDR 视频时则约为 6.5 小时。
在设备开启的情况下,充满电需要 105 分钟,而只需 69 分钟即可恢复 80% 的电量。
Honor MagicBook Art 14 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 60 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 70 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 54 Wh | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 63 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 72 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3, M3 10-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 14% | 20% | -21% | -7% | 20% | 6% | 44% | 7% | |
H.264 | 832 | 1028 24% | 1181 42% | 756 -9% | 917 10% | 1010 21% | 603 -28% | 1044 25% | 858 ? 3% |
WiFi v1.3 | 576 | 892 55% | 852 48% | 499 -13% | 458 -20% | 707 23% | 700 22% | 914 59% | 692 ? 20% |
Load | 116 | 73 -37% | 80 -31% | 70 -40% | 104 -10% | 134 16% | 145 25% | 171 47% | 114.2 ? -2% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - MagicBook Art 14 提供了一个出色的整体软件包和一个巧妙的网络摄像头解决方案
新款 MagicBook Art 14 在我们的测试中给人留下了非常好的印象。Honor ,它是一款非常均衡的超小型笔记本电脑,重量轻,但在稳定性和连接性方面毫不逊色。此外,可拆卸网络摄像头是一个巧妙的解决方案,它可以使屏幕边缘变得非常薄,而不会出现凹槽或摄像头驼峰。网络摄像头模块只需用磁铁吸附在盖子上,不用时模块就会消失在外壳中。整个装置给人一种非常坚固的感觉。
流星湖处理器并没有创造任何性能记录,但其功率极限与散热性能非常匹配,风扇噪音总体上仍然很低。由于采用了蒸汽腔散热,因此也不会出现温度问题。120 Hz 的 OLED 屏幕几乎在所有方面都令人印象深刻,即使它的反射率很高。画质非常好,色彩配置也很准确。电池续航时间也不错,尽管 MagicBook 比 Snapdragon 竞争产品或其他一些电池容量更大的比较设备稍逊一筹。
高品质、轻巧的外壳,非常好的输入设备,出色的 OLED 屏幕,性能与排放之间的良好平衡:新款Honor MagicBook Art 14 是一款优秀的子笔记本电脑,没有任何真正的弱点,但采用了非常创新的摄像头解决方案。
它与华为 MateBook X Pro 有许多相似之处,尤其是在外观上。 华为 MateBook X Pro有许多相似之处,尤其是在视觉效果上,但必须做出更多妥协。例如,外壳的稳定性、HDMI/USB-A 接口的缺失,以及最重要的风扇噪音。MateBook 在显示屏亮度方面有明显优势,但总的来说,Honor MagicBook Art 14 的整体性能更胜一筹。
与 Snapdragon 竞争产品相比,MagicBook 仅在电池续航时间方面处于劣势,但在应用程序/游戏/附件的兼容性方面没有问题。Apple's MacBook Air凭借超长的电池续航时间和快速的 M3 处理器(仍可被动散热),仍是一个强有力的竞争对手。不过,60 Hz 的 IPS 显示屏比 120 Hz 的 OLED 显示屏要弱一些。
价格和供应情况
目前我们还没有关于价格或供应情况的信息。
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击 这里可在此处查阅。
Honor MagicBook Art 14
-
08/29/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.