Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 评测:速度更快,配备 Wi-Fi 6E
MacBook Air M2 MacBook Air M2MacBook Air M21.5 年前,Apple 推出了全新设计的 MacBook Air M2。与此同时,该系列又增加了一个 15 英寸机型。去年年底,Apple ,在 MacBook Pro 机型中推出了全新的 M3-SoC 代产品,现在 MacBook Air 13 的 M3 更新也紧随其后。不出所料,MacBook Air 13 的设计没有太大变化,但它现在也支持 Wi-Fi 6E。
旧款 MacBook Air 13 M2 仍可购买(MRSP:999 美元起),取代了旧款 MacBook Air M1取代旧款 MacBook Air M1 成为制造商最便宜的 MacBook。新款 MacBook Air M3 售价 1099 美元起,比上市时的 M2 便宜 200 美元。不过,它仍然只配备了 8GB 内存和 256GB 固态硬盘。我们的测试机是配备更快的 10 核 GPU、16 GB 内存和 512GB SSD 的机型,售价为 1,499 美元。由于该设备在许多方面没有变化,我们建议大家看看我们以前对 MacBook Air M2 的评测以及对 M3 SoC 的分析:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
92.4 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3, M3 10-Core GPU | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" | 2560x1664 | |
92 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" | 2560x1664 | |
86.7 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.5 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.2 kg | 13.99 mm | 13.30" | 2880x1800 | |
91.9 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | HP Dragonfly G4 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.1 kg | 16.3 mm | 13.50" | 1920x1280 | |
87.4 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.40" | 3456x2160 | |
89.6 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.20" | 3120x2080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 全新涂层的午夜 MacBook
总的来说,MacBook Air 13 的设计和外壳质量没有任何变化。与旧款 MacBook Air M1 相比,目前的设计没有使用楔形底座。在实际使用中,尽管前缘较硬,但这并不是问题,因为底座太平了,不会对手腕造成困扰。它的构造依然出色,稳定性也同样出色。其最大开启角度为 135 度。
随着 M2 代的发布,Apple 扩展了其著名的银色和太空灰配色,增加了两种新的选择:星光色和午夜色。深蓝色的 "午夜 "在产品照片上看起来特别漂亮,但很快就变成了指纹磁铁,几乎不可能保持表面清洁。随后,新的 M3 机型(午夜版)采用了阳极氧化涂层--与 MacBook Pro 14/16 的黑色版本相同--以帮助缓解这一问题。因此,指纹印的问题大大减少。与黑色 MBP 14 的情况一样,指纹痕迹在使用较长时间后确实会变得明显,但使用抹布清洁表面要容易得多。
MacBook Air 13 厚度为 11.3 毫米,依然非常纤薄,其占地面积比戴尔 XPS 13 或 ThinkPad Z13 要大得多,几乎与 Zenbook 14 OLED 等 14 英寸设备相当。它的重量为 1.237 千克,35 瓦电源(带 2 个 USB-C)重 184 克,包括 MagSafe 电缆。
我们还添加了一些与较大型 MacBook Air 15 M3 的对比照片。 MacBook Air 15 M3的对比照片,让你更直观地了解它的尺寸。
连接性 - 现在支持两个外部显示器
在连接选项方面,没有任何变化,除了电源的 MagSafe 连接外,它的左侧仍然有两个 USB-C 端口(4.0),这两个端口仍然只支持 Thunderbolt 3。右侧只有 3.5 毫米音频插孔,我们希望至少能再看到一个 USB 接口。
但有一项功能是全新的,因为以前的 MacBook Air M2除了内置面板外,只能为一台外接显示器供电。M3 SoC 的硬件要求完全相同,因此仍然只能控制两台显示器,但如果合上屏幕盖,现在也可以使用两台外接显示器(1 台最高 6K/60Hz,1 台最高 5K/60Hz)。当然,这仍然不是完全理想,但这显然是朝着正确方向迈出的一步,如果你想使用两台显示器,这将会带来很大的不同。
我们用两个外接显示器(一个通过 USB-C,另一个通过 USB-C/HDMI 适配器)测试了新功能,效果非常好。屏幕 MacBook Pro 14 M3也将在晚些时候通过软件更新获得这一功能。
交流
Apple 新款 MacBook Air M3 更新了 WLAN 模块,现在可支持频率为 160 MHz 的 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.3。结合我们的华硕参考路由器,你可以立即看到效果,新款 MacBook Air M3 的速度是前代产品的两倍。 的两倍与较大的 MacBook Pro 机型一样快。
Networking | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
网络摄像头
它的 1080p 网络摄像头在光线条件良好的情况下仍能拍摄出不错的照片,我们对它的麦克风也毫无怨言。你还可以选择将 iPhone 用作网络摄像头。
维护
只要有一把合适的五角螺丝刀,底盖就可以拆卸下来。不过,由于没有风扇,而且所有元件都是焊接上去的,所以您可以省去这些麻烦。必要时可以更换粘在一起的电池,但只能由合格的维修人员进行。
输入设备 - 超强触控板
在输入设备方面,与 MacBook Air M2 相比没有任何变化。键盘的质量并没有达到商务笔记本电脑的标准,但总的来说,它很精确,在上面打字感觉很舒适。它的 Touch-ID 指纹扫描仪运行完美,而在白色键盘背光方面,Apple 多年来一直处于领先地位,因为它可以根据周围环境光线非常精确地自动调节强度。
它的超大触控板仍然是移动设备中的佼佼者,与 macOS 的集成也完美无瑕。由于采用了 Force Touch 技术,整个触控板上的点击都很均匀,声音也不大。此外,手势输入也非常完美。一如既往,MacBook Air 并不配备触摸屏。
显示屏 - P3 覆盖的 IPS
Apple Air 继续采用 13.6 英寸 IPS 屏幕。其分辨率为 2,560 x 1,664 像素,略有偏差。额外的 64 个垂直像素用于凹槽旁边的区域。一如既往,它看起来并不是最好的,但也没有占用实际 16:10 面板的任何空间。
主观而言,该面板的画质依然令人印象深刻。此外,macOS 仍然没有显示缩放问题。不过,由于该机型采用的仍是 60 赫兹面板,我们希望它能升级到 120 赫兹。它的响应时间不算特别快,但也不明显偏慢--在日常使用中,你不会注意到任何重影现象。它不使用 PWM,屏幕亮度和色温会根据环境光线自动调整。
我们在屏幕中间测得的最大亮度为 525 cd/m²,平均亮度略高于 500 cd/m²。遗憾的是,显示屏的黑色值 0.42 cd/m² 偏高,导致与 OLED 或 Mini-LED 面板相比,暗色内容看起来并非全黑。这也体现在屏幕的对比度上,"只有"~1,300:1。我们注意到,在高亮度水平下描绘暗色图像时,边角会出现一些背光出血现象。
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 525 cd/m²
Contrast: 1250:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6" | Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6" | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA ATNA40CU06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 ATNA33AA02-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | HP Dragonfly G4 Chi Mei CMN13C0, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5" | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P Samsung 134XK04, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.4" | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 TMX1422, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 4% | 4% | -17% | 4% | -5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 98.4 | 98.4 0% | 99.8 1% | 99.7 1% | 68.4 -30% | 99.7 1% | 89.8 -9% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 98.3 -2% | 100 0% | 99.4 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 87.9 | 87.6 0% | 97.6 11% | 97.3 11% | 70.4 -20% | 96.8 10% | 84.2 -4% |
Response Times | 7% | 98% | 93% | -28% | 93% | 58% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34.5 ? | 32.9 ? 5% | 0.69 ? 98% | 2.1 ? 94% | 48.8 ? -41% | 2.18 ? 94% | 20 ? 42% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27.2 ? | 24.9 ? 8% | 0.71 ? 97% | 2.2 ? 92% | 31.3 ? -15% | 2.08 ? 92% | 7 ? 74% |
PWM Frequency | 480 ? | 60.1 ? | 238.6 ? | 156000 ? | |||
Screen | 3% | 198% | 3% | -14% | -87% | -10% | |
Brightness middle | 525 | 526 0% | 391 -26% | 372 -29% | 408.8 -22% | 361.7 -31% | 595 13% |
Brightness | 506 | 486 -4% | 392 -23% | 375 -26% | 399 -21% | 367 -27% | 550 9% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 87 -5% | 98 7% | 99 8% | 90 -2% | 96 4% | 85 -8% |
Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.38 10% | 0.02 95% | 0.32 24% | 0.25 40% | ||
Contrast | 1250 | 1384 11% | 19550 1464% | 1278 2% | 2380 90% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.3 7% | 1.1 21% | 0.88 37% | 2.02 -44% | 4.83 -245% | 2.01 -44% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.8 | 2.7 4% | 2.4 14% | 3.22 -15% | 3.84 -37% | 9.34 -234% | 6.9 -146% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 2 -0% | 1.3 35% | 1.2 40% | 2.3 -15% | 1.8 10% | 2.74 -37% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.25 98% | 2.17 101% | 2.18 101% | 2.2 100% | 2.33 94% | 2.4 92% |
CCT | 6876 95% | 6858 95% | 6336 103% | 6326 103% | 6203 105% | 6438 101% | 6319 103% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.7 | 0.61 | 3.97 | 1.22 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
3% | 100% /
138% | 33% /
19% | -20% /
-17% | 3% /
-30% | 14% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
不过,我们使用专业 CalMAN 软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)进行分析后发现,该面板的色调略微偏蓝,色温也略微偏低。使用我们自己的校准软件(可在上面免费下载相应的配置文件),我们成功地控制了这两个问题,进一步降低了总偏差。反过来,其最大亮度也降低了约 25 cd/m²。完全覆盖 P3 色彩空间。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.5 ms rise | |
↘ 11.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
34.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.9 ms rise | |
↘ 17.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
虽然 Macbook Air 的显示屏一般都很光亮,但它不像大多数采用 OLED 面板或触摸屏的 Windows 笔记本电脑那样反光。因此,只要避免阳光直射,你仍然可以在明亮的环境中工作。它的视角稳定性非常好。
性能 - 3 纳米 M3 SoC
MacBook Air 13 有两种不同的 M3 SoC 可供选择。配备 8 个内核的 CPU 部分完全相同,而基本型号则继续配备 8 个 GPU 内核,并可选择配备速度更快的 10 核 GPU,这在 MacBook Pro 14 M3.你可以选择 8、16 或 24 GB 内存。顺便说一句,电源的选择不会对设备的性能产生任何影响。
处理器 -Apple M3,3 纳米制程
M3 SoC Apple M3 SoC是Apple 首款采用 3 纳米工艺制造的芯片。其核心配置与旧版 M2 SoC但得益于制造工艺的改进,Apple 在不增加能耗的情况下提高了时钟频率。现在,它的四个性能内核最高主频可达 4.056 GHz(或所有内核加载时约为 3.6 GHz),四个效率内核最高主频可达 2.748 GHz。在多核测试中,该处理器的功耗曾一度达到约 21 瓦,之后稳步下降,在 12 分钟的连续负载中达到 10.5 瓦(R23 Multi:8237 点,因此降低约 19%)。总体而言,它在短时间测试中的表现与 MacBook Pro 14 M3的性能保持稳定,这要归功于其主动散热系统。
与旧版 M2 SoC 相比,其性能平均提高了约 20%。这意味着 M3 SoC 的性能略低于 Ryzen 7 7840U或 酷睿至尊 7 155H的水平。 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12不过,这两种机型的能耗也更高。
在单核测试中,Apple 的性能比 M2 提高了 20%,在 AMD 和英特尔的竞争中拔得头筹。这些成绩令人印象深刻,尤其是考虑到其单核能耗仅为 5 瓦多。我们已经在的分析文章中介绍了新款 M3 SoC 的效率。 在电池使用情况下,MacBook Air 13 M3 的 CPU 性能保持不变。更多 CPU 基准测试请访问。
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core | |
Apple M3 | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average of class Subnotebook (148 - 1162, n=48, last 2 years) | |
Average Apple M3 (576 - 712, n=4) | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Apple M3 |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core | |
Apple M3 | |
Average Apple M3 (140 - 142, n=4) | |
Apple M3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (35 - 142, n=31, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core | |
Apple M2 Pro | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U | |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Apple M3 | |
Average Apple M3 (10074 - 10454, n=3) | |
Apple M3 | |
Apple M2 | |
Intel Core i7-1365U |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core | |
Apple M3 | |
Average Apple M3 (1900 - 1904, n=3) | |
Apple M3 | |
Intel Core i7-1365U | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Apple M2 Pro | |
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core | |
Apple M2 |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U | |
Apple M3 | |
Average Apple M3 (11863 - 12066, n=5) | |
Apple M3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 15220, n=59, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core | |
Apple M3 | |
Average Apple M3 (3026 - 3130, n=5) | |
Apple M3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3130, n=54, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core | |
Apple M2 Pro | |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Apple M3 | |
Apple M3 | |
Average Apple M3 (10570 - 10774, n=3) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=59, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Apple M2 | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Intel Core i7-1365U |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Apple M3 | |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core | |
Average Apple M3 (2256 - 2350, n=3) | |
Apple M3 | |
Apple M2 Pro | |
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core | |
Apple M2 | |
Intel Core i7-1365U | |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
系统性能
旧款 MacBook Air M2在日常使用中已经是一款超快的设备,新的 M3 SoC 也是如此。特别是在运行本地应用程序时,它的性能非常出色,在合成基准测试中,新款 MacBook Air 13 M3 几乎总是领先于 Windows 系统的竞争对手。
基于英特尔处理器的 Mac 应用程序可以通过 Rosetta 2 进行模拟,效果非常好。速度上可能会有些许差异(尤其是在复杂的应用程序中),但总的来说,运行绝对良好。目前,围绕人工智能的话题已是大势所趋,Apple ,自M1 芯片发布以来,它也已安装了神经引擎形式的 NPU 。例如,它可用于在撰写信息时预测单词。如果您喜欢使用包括 Co-Pilot 在内的微软办公套件,那么您不必担心,因为这项功能是通过云提供的,这意味着与 Windows 设备没有任何区别。
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Jetstream 2: Total Score
CrossMark / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (1847 - 1857, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (1716 - 1729, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (2183 - 2210, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=57, last 2 years) | |
HP Dragonfly G4 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (1364 - 1367, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (423 - 448, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=58, last 2 years) | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (313 - 315, n=2) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (363 - 373, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 |
Jetstream 2 / Total Score | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (305 - 318, n=3) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (117 - 478, n=38, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
正如 MacBook Pro 14 M3Apple ,MacBook Air 13 M3 继续只配备 PCIe-3.0 固态硬盘。我们的测试设备安装的是 512GB 版本(AP0512Z),其传输速率符合预期,即 ~3.5 GB/s。因此,在日常使用中不会遇到任何限制。我们预计 256GB 型号的性能会更低(约为 50%),我们将尽快进行检查。首次启动设备后,用户有 465 GB 的可用空间。Air M3 最多可安装 2 TB 的固态硬盘。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里。
图形卡
我们的测试样品安装了 10 核的 M3 GPU,我们已经从 MacBook Pro 14 M3 上了解到这一点。它的最大功耗约为 15 瓦,总的来说,其性能与 MacBook Pro 处于同一水平,尽管 Air 在长期负载情况下也会减速。在 3DMark WildLife-Extreme 压力测试中,运行 20 次后,Air 的成绩下降了约 25%。其 GPU 性能也比拥有 10 个内核的旧款 M2 GPU 高出 20%。在电池使用情况下,它的图形性能保持不变,更多基准测试可参见 这里.
MacBook 上的游戏速度正在慢慢加快,《全面战争:法老王》或《博德之门 3》等游戏都能在 MacBook 上原生运行。不过,《博德之门 3》对高细节的要求太高,所以你必须激活 FSR,才能在 1080p/High 下达到约 35fps。说到 FSR,你至少应该选择设置质量,因为如果不这样做,笔记本的图形性能就会大打折扣。古墓丽影》或 Witcher 3 等模拟游戏也可以在 MacBook 上运行,但根据游戏的不同,可能会有一些限制,其性能也会受到一些限制。
Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
Average of class Subnotebook (129 - 237, n=3, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (121 - 134, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 36 | 24 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 103 | 38 | 34 | 30 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 31 | 26 | 21 | 19 |
Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 123 | 67 | 43 | 28 |
废气排放 - MacBook Air 始终悄无声息
噪音排放
MacBook Air 13 与速度类似的 Windows 系统同类产品相比,最大的优势仍然是它的被动散热。无论你在设备上做什么(甚至在为两台外接显示器供电时),它始终保持静音,不会发出任何电子噪音。
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | HP Dragonfly G4 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP1024Z | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | ||||||||
off / environment * | 23.4 | 25.1 | 23.3 | 23.7 | 25.4 | 24.2 | ||
Idle Minimum * | 23.4 | 25.8 | 23.5 | 24 | 25.4 | 24.2 | ||
Idle Average * | 23.4 | 25.8 | 23.5 | 24 | 25.4 | 24.2 | ||
Idle Maximum * | 24.5 | 28.3 | 26.8 | 24.4 | 29.6 | 24.2 | ||
Load Average * | 39.3 | 28.3 | 27.2 | 37 | 42 | 25.1 | ||
Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.9 | 44.8 | 32.7 | 42.1 | 25.1 | |||
Load Maximum * | 39.3 | 44.8 | 35 | 42 | 40.9 | 48.5 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
尽管采用了被动散热技术,Apple 仍然能控制机箱温度,在空闲模式下/执行简单任务时,设备几乎不会发热。在一小时的压力测试后,我们注意到在底座顶部和底部的中间区域有一个 44°C 的热点。当然,这很明显,但不会限制笔记本电脑的使用。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.8 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.9 °C / 91.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4.6 °C / -8.3 F).
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -8% | -5% | -6% | -9% | -6% | -29% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44.3 | 44.7 -1% | 40.9 8% | 46.2 -4% | 38.6 13% | 43.8 1% | 46.5 -5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 43.4 | 44.6 -3% | 46.8 -8% | 48.4 -12% | 40.4 7% | 44.4 -2% | 44.7 -3% |
Idle Upper Side * | 22.3 | 25.1 -13% | 24.1 -8% | 23.2 -4% | 28.2 -26% | 24 -8% | 34.9 -57% |
Idle Bottom * | 22.1 | 25.3 -14% | 24.6 -11% | 23 -4% | 29 -31% | 25.2 -14% | 32.9 -49% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在压力测试中,M3 SoC 的功耗曾一度高达 33 瓦,但随后迅速下降。在此 MacBook Pro 14 M3凭借其主动散热器占据了明显的优势,尽管它也无法长时间保持最大值。
在 CPU/GPU 负载情况下,处理器的功耗平衡在 8.5-9 瓦左右,与前代产品相同。不过,在新款 MacBook Air M3 中,GPU 被放在了优先位置。
发言人
鉴于该设备的底座很薄,配备四个扬声器的音响系统仍能提供非常好的音效,在很多情况下,你甚至不需要外接扬声器。不过,较大型 MacBook Pro 的音响系统更加出色,而 Windows 系统的竞争产品(如 华硕 Zenbook 14或 惠普蜻蜓 G4)也赶上了 MacBook Air,在某些情况下甚至超过了 MacBook Air。
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Dragonfly G4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 电池寿命长
耗电量
在全亮度下空转时,MacBook Air 13 M3 比前代产品略显节俭。 略显节俭。在负载情况下,35 瓦的电源仍然是限制因素。在使用功率更大的 65 瓦电源时,我们测得的短时间峰值功耗为 66 瓦,几分钟后功耗下降,低于 35 瓦。在接下来的过程中,其消耗平衡在 23 瓦左右。在这种情况下使用 35 瓦的电源时,为了满足额外的电力需求,最终需要使用电池。不幸的是,目前几乎所有英特尔子笔记本电脑都存在这个问题。
Off / Standby | 0.17 / 0.31 Watt |
Idle | 1.95 / 8.7 / 8.9 Watt |
Load |
34.3 / 35.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3, M3 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6" | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6" | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | HP Dragonfly G4 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5" | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.4" | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2" | Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -3% | -73% | -59% | -35% | -78% | -67% | -17% | -49% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.95 | 1.9 3% | 6.1 -213% | 5.8 -197% | 4.1 -110% | 6.9 -254% | 4.1 -110% | 2.1 ? -8% | 4.4 ? -126% |
Idle Average * | 8.7 | 9.6 -10% | 10 -15% | 6.2 29% | 7.5 14% | 7.4 15% | 6.6 24% | 10.6 ? -22% | 7.57 ? 13% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.9 | 9.7 -9% | 10.3 -16% | 12.7 -43% | 8.2 8% | 13.6 -53% | 8 10% | 10.9 ? -22% | 9.39 ? -6% |
Load Average * | 34.3 | 32.4 6% | 53.3 -55% | 27.2 21% | 35.5 -3% | 43.5 -27% | 61 -78% | 35.5 ? -3% | 45.7 ? -33% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 28.6 | 30.8 -8% | 42 -47% | 54.1 -89% | 37.5 -31% | 48 -68% | 56 -96% | ||
Load Maximum * | 35.4 | 35.7 -1% | 67 -89% | 61.4 -73% | 66.5 -88% | 63.3 -79% | 90 -154% | 46.4 ? -31% | 68.6 ? -94% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
其 56.2 Wh 的电池容量保持不变,我们在电池测试中也看到了类似的结果。在 WLAN 测试中,亮度调整为 150 cd/m²(比最大亮度降低了 7 级大亮度和 2 级小亮度),我们测得的时间略高于 15 小时,这意味着它比前一代 M2 多用了半小时。惠普 惠普蜻蜓 G4的电池容量更大,续航时间也长了 40 分钟,而所有其他 Windows 竞争对手都落在后面。在全屏亮度下,WLAN 测试仅持续了约 7 个小时,比旧款机型多 1 个小时(这也与较低的闲置耗电量相吻合)。我们将尽快提供其他电池测试的结果。
MacBook Air 的电池充电速度仍然不是特别快,使用 35 瓦的电源,在开机状态下充电需要约 2.5 小时。在我们对 MacBook Air M2 的
评测中,我们增加了使用不同电源对其充电时间的测试结果。<br />Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3, M3 10-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, 51.5 Wh | HP Dragonfly G4 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 68 Wh | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -6% | -16% | -49% | 8% | -52% | -38% | -21% | |
H.264 | 1044 | 946 -9% | 1010 -3% | 527 -50% | 927 ? -11% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 914 | 884 -3% | 707 -23% | 469 -49% | 954 4% | 436 -52% | 580 -37% | 734 ? -20% |
Load | 171 | 134 -22% | 192 12% | 124 -27% | 117.7 ? -31% |
Pros
Cons
结论:配备 M3 SoC 的 MacBook Air 13 更胜一筹
之后 MacBook Pro 14在去年年底发布了配备全新 M3 SoC 的 MacBook Pro 14 之后,我们已经知道了 MacBook Air M3 的预期。由于新的 3 纳米芯片的功耗与 M2 SoC 基本相同,因此 MacBook Air 也能充分发挥新 M3 的潜力,比 M2 领先 20%。
虽然被动散热会导致笔记本电脑在长期负载时性能略有下降(约 20%),但这是当前英特尔机型的常态(至少在多核性能方面),即使采用主动散热也是如此。另一方面,其出色的单核性能保持不变,在这方面,Apple ,能够将竞争对手--AMD Ryzen-8000 处理器和英特尔流星湖芯片--甩在身后。而这一切都发生在一个被动冷却的设备中。目前,还没有同类的 Windows 替代产品能提供如此强劲的性能,同时又没有恼人的风扇噪音。
即使在其他方面,MacBook Air M3 也没有出现任何重大失误。由于配备了 Wi-Fi 6E(160 MHz),Apple ,MacBook Air M3 在 WLAN 性能方面迎头赶上。虽然缺少 Thunderbolt 4 在日常使用中应该比左侧仅限于 2x USB-C 的问题要小一些,但它的连接情况可能是该设备的主要缺陷。一如既往,它的运行时间令人震惊,即使 Windows 竞争对手正在慢慢追赶Apple 。带有两个 USB-C 端口的 35 瓦电源可能比较实用,但如果你想充分发挥 M3 的潜力,它的功率实际上略显不足。它的性能不会受到影响,但不足的部分确实要由笔记本电脑的电池吸收几分钟。现在,新的午夜色机身上多了一层涂层,使其不再像以前那样容易沾染指纹。
更好的性能和更快的无线局域网:有了新的 M3 SoC,Apple ,MacBook Air 13 变得更加出色,没有任何 Windows 替代产品能提供更好的整体解决方案。静音运行尤其是 MacBook Air 的一大优势。
该设备的 13.6 英寸 IPS 面板继续提供色彩准确、亮度水平良好的画质,但我们希望能慢慢看到它升级到 120 Hz。不过,与 Mini-LED 和 OLED 面板相比,它的优势在于无需使用 PWM。如果关上显示屏盖子,新款 Air M3 现在还能容纳两台外接显示器。当然,这并不理想,但对于希望在办公桌上使用两台显示器的用户来说,这可能很有用。它最大的问题仍然是价格,1099 美元的售价仍然只有 8GB 内存和 256GB 固态硬盘。但似乎仍有足够的买家,至少对于普通用户来说,这样的配置肯定还是足够的。
价格和供应情况
目前,新款 MacBook Air 13 M3 可以在许多在线零售商处购买。例如,在亚马逊上,基本型号的售价为1,099 美元。
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU
- 03/07/2024 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
此外,我们还提供了与尺寸更大的 MacBook Air 15 M3的对比照片,让您对尺寸有更直观的印象。