华为 MateBook 14 (2024) 3:2 屏幕笔记本电脑评测--一些小问题让人失望
尽管在美国受到制裁,但华为仍然成功地在全球销售笔记本电脑,这属于为数不多的产品。不过,最新的 MateBook 14 很可能是最后一款,因为继 AMD 之后,英特尔也不再被允许向华为出售任何处理器。除了抢眼的绿色之外,这款笔记本的另一个吸引人之处在于它不同寻常的长宽比:Matebook 14 是少数采用 3:2 长宽比的笔记本电脑之一。这意味着它的屏幕面积很大,而体积却很小。
这款设备的竞争对手来自最广泛的制造商:三星、联想、宏碁和惠普都推出了 14 英寸铝壳笔记本电脑,配备高分辨率屏幕和功能强大的英特尔酷睿 7 155H。而 Galaxy Book4 Pro, Yoga 9和 惠普Pavilion Plus与华为笔记本电脑相比,它们都有一个很大的不同。它们都采用 16:10 长宽比。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83.5 % | 06 / 2024 | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 17.08 mm | 14.20" | 2880x1920 | |
87.4 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.2 kg | 11.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
90.5 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
v (old) | 12 / 2023 | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
90.4 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
87.8 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18.8 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
如今,除了白色、灰色和黑色,没有多少笔记本电脑有其他颜色。游戏笔记本电脑中的 RGB 灯光最多只能带来一点色彩。华为在 MateBook 14 上表现出了勇气,除了时尚的灰色版本外,还发布了一款极具吸引力的绿色笔记本电脑。虽然颜色看起来没有制造商网站上的那么鲜艳,但 Matebook 14 仍然很吸引眼球。
关于 Matebook 的制造质量,我们一如既往地表示肯定。底座和显示屏盖子稳固,铰链平滑,缝隙均匀。这台笔记本不仅看起来高档,而且手感也很好。在我们看来,屏幕的开口角度可以稍大一些。因为它是一个触摸屏,还支持笔输入,如果能把它平放在桌面上会更舒适。遗憾的是,约 150 ° 的最大开启角度无法实现这一点。
尽管长宽比为 3:2,但 Matebook 14 在尺寸和重量方面与其他 14 英寸笔记本电脑差别不大。不过,1.3 千克的重量在同类产品中算是较轻的。
连接性
原则上,Matebook 14 可能拥有所有必要的连接选项,但我们得出的结论是,它还可以拥有更多的连接选项。笔记本电脑右侧只有一个 USB 3.2 Gen 1 端口。左侧至少还有一个 HDMI 端口、USB-C 连接和一个 3.5 毫米插孔。
唯一的 USB-C 端口可能主要被充电器占用。显然不支持 Thunderbolt。
交流
Matebook 14 采用了焊接式英特尔 AX201,使无线局域网和蓝牙成为可能。这意味着其可能的连接类型止于 5 GHz。虽然在没有 Wi-Fi 6E 的情况下,笔记本电脑的传输速度仍然可观,但这绝不是最新的技术。
网络摄像头
笔记本电脑的全高清网络摄像头可以提供不错的图像,但明显经过压缩。因此,在网络摄像头的照片中很难辨认出小细节。我们的结论是,这主要是由于使用相机和镜头测试卡拍摄的图像在压缩和传输图像材料时出现了误差。在某些镜头中,图像素材上叠加了明显的伪影,而另一些镜头则几乎没有任何干扰,因此图像清晰。这个问题在日常使用中应该很难察觉。只有仔细观察,才会发现我们的自拍照中有些东西被洗掉了。在蓝色 T 恤领口和颈部的过渡处,压缩导致两处图像模糊。
安全
Matebook 14 的电源按钮上安装了指纹扫描仪,可确保登录笔记本电脑时的便利性和安全性。由于采用了英特尔处理器,还提供了 fTPM 2.0 功能。
配件
我们的测试设备只配备了一个充电器和一系列典型的文件,包括快速入门指南和保修声明。如果您愿意,还可以随 Matebook 14 购买华为 M-Pencil (第三代)。除了触摸输入外,该笔记本的屏幕还允许使用数字笔输入。不过,这里也要注意屏幕的最大开启角度不佳。
维护
即使拧开 Matebook 14 的螺丝很容易,但也不值得。除了 NVMe 固态硬盘,你无法升级其他任何东西。出于维护目的,你唯一能做的就是偶尔清洁一下风扇。
维护
保修
华为笔记本电脑在美国享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。这也包括其专有电源。之前提到的美国制裁可能会导致最终无法找到替换部件。
Input devices
键盘
Matebook 的键盘相对较平,按键升降幅度不大。此外,由于按压点呈海绵状,手感也不是很好。在市场营销方面,键盘背光可以用 "顺眼 "来形容。换句话说,键盘的背光并不是非常明亮。但对于在黑暗中工作还是足够的。
触摸板
12 x 7.4 厘米触摸板的哑光表面触感良好。对输入的响应毫无延迟。Matebook 能完全识别多点触控手势。
显示屏
我们测试样品的屏幕长宽比为 3:2,在现代笔记本电脑中是一种不同寻常的格式。OLED 面板的刷新率高达 120 Hz,分辨率为 2,880 × 1,920 像素。屏幕亮度约为 370 cd/m²,边缘略呈圆形。乍一看,这很不错,但遗憾的是,Windows 仍未针对圆角显示屏边缘进行优化,导致某些图像元素有时会被切断。
此外,Matebook 14 的 OLED 屏幕支持 HDR 内容。在 HDR 模式下,我们在笔记本中央测得的亮度高达 500 cd/m²。在电池模式下,HDR 模式关闭。
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 422 cd/m²
Contrast: 24867:1 (Black: 0.015 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.78
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
73.94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.79% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.42% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.179
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T EDO0142, OLED, 2880x1920, 14.2" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 ATNA40CU07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 ATNA40YK11-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 MNE007JA1-1, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 16% | 23% | 24% | -5% | 23% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 72.42 | 97 34% | 99.8 38% | 99.75 38% | 67.1 -7% | 99.8 38% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.79 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.99 0% | 97.8 -2% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 73.94 | 85.2 15% | 97.3 32% | 98.56 33% | 69.4 -6% | 95.8 30% |
Response Times | 62% | 62% | 46% | -232% | 99% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7 ? | 0.83 ? 88% | 0.8 ? 89% | 2.2 ? 69% | 38.4 ? -449% | 0.82 ? 88% |
Response Time Black / White * | 22 ? | 0.69 ? 97% | 1 ? 95% | 12.8 ? 42% | 25.1 ? -14% | 0.95 ? 96% |
PWM Frequency | 238 ? | 240 ? 1% | 240.5 ? 1% | 300 26% | 504.7 ? 112% | |
Screen | -6% | -69% | -115% | -165% | -33% | |
Brightness middle | 373 | 392 5% | 371.6 0% | 388 4% | 398 7% | 384 3% |
Brightness | 377 | 398 6% | 373 -1% | 391 4% | 379 1% | 386 2% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 97 3% | 99 5% | 98 4% | 90 -4% | 98 4% |
Black Level * | 0.015 | 0.0411 -174% | 0.23 -1433% | |||
Contrast | 24867 | 9440 -62% | 1730 -93% | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.47 | 1.3 12% | 4.91 -234% | 6.32 -330% | 1.3 12% | 4.06 -176% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.49 | 3.2 -29% | 8.33 -235% | 8.82 -254% | 3.1 -24% | 6.73 -170% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.78 | 1.59 11% | 4.79 -169% | 1.2 33% | 0.49 72% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 2.3 -35% | 2.2 -29% | 2.61 -54% | 1.4 18% | 1.1 35% |
Gamma | 2.179 101% | 2.24 98% | 2.25 98% | 1.772 124% | 2.26 97% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 6556 99% | 6517 100% | 6120 106% | 6202 105% | 6448 101% | 6331 103% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 24% /
16% | 5% /
-18% | -15% /
-55% | -134% /
-140% | 30% /
10% |
* ... smaller is better
Matebook 14 的 OLED 面板只完全覆盖了 sRGB 色彩空间。AdobeRGB 和 DisplayP3 的覆盖率约为 70%。
可以通过华为控制面板在 Matebook 上选择专业色彩模式。不过,根据我们的测量,该模式对笔记本色彩还原的准确性有相当负面的影响。最终,它在交付状态下的色彩还原还是非常不错的,而且在 ColorChecker 测试中从未出现过ΔΕ2000 3 的数值。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.5 ms rise | |
↘ 3.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.5 ms rise | |
↘ 3.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 238 Hz Amplitude: 57 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 238 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 238 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PWM
除了 OLED 在刷新屏幕内容时会出现的典型闪烁现象外,我们还在 Matebook 上检测到低亮度时的闪烁现象。除了 240 Hz 的刷新频率外,还有一些 1 kHz 左右的闪烁。
由于 Matebook 显示屏表面闪闪发光,在室外使用它有点困难。虽然 370 cd/m² 的亮度在阳光直射的情况下应该足够明亮,但强烈的反光让人很难做到这一点。
Matebook 14 的 OLED 面板亮度下降不仅在照片上很明显,随着视角的增大,肉眼也能看到。不过,屏幕可辨认的区域还是很大的。
性能
Matebook 14 (2024) 配备了 英特尔酷睿 5 125 H或 Ultra 7 155 H.绿色笔记本配备 Ultra 7 155H、16 GB 内存和 1 TB NVMe 固态硬盘。灰色的 Matebook 14 (2024) 目前只销售酷睿 Ultra 5 和 512GB SSD。
测试条件
Matebook 14 的电源控制并不复杂。当连接到电源时,你可以使用性能模式和平衡模式。在电池模式下,还可以使用省电模式。根据我们的研究结果,至少在性能模式和平衡模式下,PL1 和 PL2 不会发生变化。该笔记本电脑的启动功率为 64 瓦,持续功率为 42 瓦。只有在省电模式下,其持续功率才大幅降至 20 瓦。
我们在观察笔记本电脑的风扇控制和目标温度时,更能发现性能模式和平衡模式之间的差异。这意味着发生了动态重新调整。在日常运行中,当提升性能更具有决定性时,你几乎不会注意到两种运行模式之间的区别。
处理器
由于华为允许英特尔处理器采用高 TDP,因此 酷睿至尊 7 155H能够在处理器基准测试中展现其优势。在所有多核基准测试中,Matebook 都名列前茅,而我们测试设备的单核性能则相当一般。我们没有发现任何异常。6 个 P 核心、8 个 E 核心和 2 个 LPE 核心确保了可观的性能。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9769 - 19007, n=48) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1496 - 1815, n=48) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3798 - 7409, n=46) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=60, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (601 - 696, n=46) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=60, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1932 - 2880, n=52) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=66, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (99.6 - 268, n=48) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (175 - 381, n=44) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (41739 - 70254, n=46) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=57, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (4795 - 5621, n=46) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (7732 - 13656, n=51) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 15220, n=58, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3130, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1901 - 2473, n=48) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10017 - 13556, n=48) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1462 - 1824, n=48) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9.93 - 21.2, n=46) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=58, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (37.5 - 79.2, n=45) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.4457 - 0.53, n=45) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=46) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=46) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=46) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=46) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=59, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=46) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=46) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=46) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=46) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=46) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=46) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
系统性能
尽管华为的测试设备拥有同类产品中最快的处理器,但却没有最好的内存和最快的固态硬盘。因此,这款笔记本电脑在 PCMark 10 中被联想 Yoga 9 击败,尽管只有几分之差。归根结底,比较领域中的所有笔记本电脑都相当强劲。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5159 - 7529, n=32) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=51, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8580 - 11289, n=32) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=51, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (7822 - 10591, n=32) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=51, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (4985 - 10709, n=32) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=51, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=32) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=57, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1291 - 1798, n=31) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=57, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=31) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (939 - 1802, n=31) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=57, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=58, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (252 - 299, n=32) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (234 - 309, n=27) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (517 - 614, n=33) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=66, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7028 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=46) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=46) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 117898, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=46) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (116.2 - 233, n=46) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=59, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们测试设备中的西部数据 PC SN740 NVMe 固态硬盘对于多媒体笔记本电脑来说完全够用。它的读取和写入速度都不错,虽然没有达到最高水平,但 AS SSD 的表现也是如此。我们无法在 DiskSPD 循环中检测到节流现象。根据 ChristalDiskInfo 提供的信息,该固态硬盘的温度远低于 60 °C。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
原则上,新的 8 核 Arc iGPU是一款功能强大的像素加速器。在某些基准测试和游戏中,该芯片的性能甚至超过了 Nvidia 的一款入门级 GPU。如果只看一般的基准测试,该芯片还能展示它在 MateBook 中的性能。
即便如此,由于 iGPU 的显存限制在 128 MB,一些游戏和应用程序在使用 MateBook 14 时还是会出现问题。Blender 在 MateBook 14 上使用英特尔的 oneAPI 启动计算需要多次尝试。有些游戏显示显存不足的警告,但启动后又能正常运行。只有《地平线:零之黎明》和《地平线:西部禁区》完全无法启动。
我们无法找到该问题的解决方案。该设备的显存无法通过各种配套程序或笔记本的 UEFI 进行扩展。不过,我们可以在其他允许自定义的设备上重现专用 iGPU 内存过低的效果。我们还将在下面的电源管理部分讨论 Matebook 在 GPU 性能方面的另一个特殊功能。
3DMark 11 Performance | 12483 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 35147 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7919 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3767 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 584 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2800 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
目前几乎所有的游戏都能以全高清和中等画质设置在 Matebook 14 上运行。不过,如前所述,有几款游戏由于某种原因无法处理笔记本电脑的低设置内存。总的来说,《地平线》系列的两款游戏在 Arc iGPU 上运行也相当流畅,正如我们的 笔记本游戏性能对比所示。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8.5 - 43.7, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 21.8 | ||||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 98.4 | 36.2 | 35.9 | 35.2 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 66.8 | 37.6 | 26.5 | 19.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 52.5 | 39.9 | 31.7 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 39 | 32 | 31 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 165.9 | 72.5 | 59.1 | 48.9 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 0 game wont start | ||||
F1 23 (2023) | 73.4 | 66.9 | |||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 34.6 | 29.6 | 27.7 | 23.6 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 29.8 | 25.1 | 22.8 | 20.6 | |
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 0 game wont start |
排放量
噪音排放
性能模式和平衡模式在 Matebook 上产生的噪音截然不同。在平衡模式下,我们在距离测试设备 15 厘米处测量到约 37 dB(A),并使用 Prime95 和 Furmark 将其置于满负荷状态。在性能模式下,运行相同的程序和相同的测量条件,我们测得的噪音高出 9 分贝(A)。这导致感知音量高出约两倍。Matebook 14 的最大音量为 46.6 dB(A),对于耳朵敏感的人来说可能会很烦人,但我们没有注意到笔记本电脑发出任何线圈啸叫。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.11 / 25.11 / 27.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 31.3 / 46.61 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.11 dB(A) |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 6% | 3% | -1% | 13% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 25.11 | 24.5 2% | 23.2 8% | 25 -0% | 23.1 8% | 23.4 7% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.11 | 24.5 2% | 23.6 6% | 25 -0% | 23.1 8% | 24.1 4% |
Idle Average * | 25.11 | 24.5 2% | 23.6 6% | 25 -0% | 23.1 8% | 24.1 4% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.2 | 24.5 10% | 25 8% | 26.2 4% | 23.1 15% | 25.3 7% |
Load Average * | 31.3 | 32.4 -4% | 34.8 -11% | 35.7 -14% | 26.5 15% | 33.4 -7% |
Load Maximum * | 46.61 | 36.7 21% | 46.2 1% | 45.5 2% | 35.78 23% | 39.4 15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.7 | 37.7 | 35.7 | 39.4 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
尽管性能很高,但 Matebook 14 从未变得超热,但我们在底部和顶部某些部位测得的温度接近 50 °C,时间长了很可能会让人不舒服。值得庆幸的是,你应该不会经常接触到这些热点;当笔记本电脑放在你的大腿上时,你也许应该避免使用性能模式。由于使用平衡模式时的目标温度较低,设备的温度也不会太高。它的最热点约为 44 °C,比较舒适。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.2 °C / 95.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-6.9 °C / -12.5 F).
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 12% | 0% | 4% | 10% | 18% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 45.2 | 41 9% | 40 12% | 36.5 19% | 43.5 4% | 39 14% |
Maximum Bottom * | 49.2 | 44.2 10% | 43 13% | 49.5 -1% | 47.4 4% | 35.8 27% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.6 | 25.3 15% | 32 -8% | 25.5 14% | 24.9 16% | 25.2 15% |
Idle Bottom * | 30.2 | 26.2 13% | 35.2 -17% | 35 -16% | 26 14% | 25.6 15% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Matebook 14 的音质非常好。我们唯一的抱怨是中音有点过强。总的来说,该设备的低音出奇地强劲,高音也很清晰,而中音往往显得有点过大。
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
耗电量
Matebook 配备的 65 瓦电源根本无法为设备提供足够的能量。在压力测试中(见下文),笔记本的电池电量被耗尽。如果使用功率更大的 100 瓦电源,Matebook 的最大功耗将从 67.7 瓦增加到 85 瓦。不过,我们在测量功耗时特意使用了原装电源装置。
总的来说,Matebook 14 的性能所需的电量是合理的。在空闲模式和低负载情况下,尽管笔记本电脑采用 OLED 显示屏,但如果限制屏幕亮度,它甚至相当节能。与 OLED 显示屏的典型情况一样,在较高的显示亮度下,功耗会明显增加。
Off / Standby | 0.6 / 0.9 Watt |
Idle | 4.4 / 5.6 / 12.5 Watt |
Load |
52.1 / 67.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00, OLED, 2880x1920, 14.2" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, WDC PC SN810 1TB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -3% | -7% | -28% | 22% | -2% | -21% | -0% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.4 | 5.7 -30% | 4.2 5% | 5.5 -25% | 3.3 25% | 6 -36% | 5.41 ? -23% | 4.44 ? -1% |
Idle Average * | 5.6 | 8.7 -55% | 7.1 -27% | 10.1 -80% | 5.6 -0% | 6.5 -16% | 8.64 ? -54% | 7.55 ? -35% |
Idle Maximum * | 12.5 | 8.9 29% | 12.9 -3% | 11.2 10% | 6.1 51% | 13.9 -11% | 12.1 ? 3% | 9.45 ? 24% |
Load Average * | 52.1 | 44.5 15% | 58.9 -13% | 45.9 12% | 40.1 23% | 41.9 20% | 54.2 ? -4% | 45.8 ? 12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.7 | 36.9 21% | 49.5 -6% | 60.9 -30% | 41.4 11% | 43.9 6% | ||
Load Maximum * | 67.3 | 65.2 3% | 66.7 1% | 104.1 -55% | 51.8 23% | 50.8 25% | 85 ? -26% | 68.4 ? -2% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
压力测试
在使用 Prime95 和 Furmark 进行的压力测试中,我们测得笔记本电脑的功耗和处理器时钟频率出现了一些周期性的强烈波动。我们最初认为是散热不足,但很快就发现电源在这方面有很大的影响。65 瓦的电源变得相当热,并限制了其输出功率。因此,该设备无法充分发挥性能。3D Mark 的基准测试也证明了这一点,测试是在使用原装电源、100 瓦电源和电池模式下进行的。有趣的是,Matebook 在电池模式下和使用功率更大的电源时都能提供比使用 65 瓦电源时更高的性能。以下所有Time Spy 基准测试均在性能模式下进行。这表明,在使用原装电源的情况下,电池运行可提供比电源运行更高的性能。
不同场景下的 3D MarkTime Spy 结果
运行时间
在我们进行的 Wi-Fi 网上冲浪测试中,华为笔记本电脑的电池续航时间表现良好。12 小时的续航时间肯定能让你度过一天。不过,如果您使用设备的全部电量,例如玩游戏或运行要求较高的应用程序时,电池的续航能力会迅速下降。电池容量为 70 瓦时,与 Matebook 的大小相称,但笔记本电脑很容易需要 50 至 70 瓦的电量。在紧急情况下,电池的电量仅够运行一到两个小时。使用原装充电器充电的速度非常慢,这取决于电池的容量和供电装置的功率。在闲置模式下开机时,笔记本电脑需要 90 多分钟才能充满电池。
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 63 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 65 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, 52.5 Wh | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -43% | -37% | -50% | -26% | -35% | -15% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 758 | 458 -40% | 600 -21% | 479 -37% | 729 -4% | 510 -33% | 726 ? -4% |
Gaming | 85 | 85 ? 0% | |||||
Load | 194 | 104 -46% | 93 -52% | 74 -62% | 100 -48% | 122 -37% | 115.4 ? -41% |
H.264 | 917 | 911 ? | |||||
Reader / Idle | 855 | 1011 | 1750 ? |
Pros
Cons
评价--小瑕疵多
你无法否认华为 Matebook 14 (2024) 的优势。引人注目的设计与完美无瑕的性能相得益彰。其高分辨率 OLED 面板可呈现色彩还原度极高的绚丽画面。在这种情况下,这款笔记本的扬声器质量也令人惊叹。Matebook 14 是一款潜力巨大的外来者。如果你经常使用笔记本电脑工作,那么你一定会喜欢它的 3:2 显示屏。如果你经常出门在外,那么你可能需要一个更坚固的铝制外壳。遗憾的是,这款产品还有不少不足之处。
华为提供的电源不够强大,导致笔记本电脑无法充分发挥其性能,这是一个遗憾。iGPU 的 RAM 设置也不理想,这是一个不必要的批评点,幸好制造商可能会通过固件更新来解决这个问题。另一方面,无论如何更新,都无法改善其 WLAN 模块和平庸的连接选择。更不用说在我们的测试中,它的网络摄像头还出现了一些图像错误,这让这款笔记本电脑给人的整体印象大打折扣。尽管如此,你也许可以接受这些缺点。在实际使用中,我们经常不会注意到 Wi-Fi 6 和 Wi-Fi 6E 的区别。你可以使用网络摄像头的画面。另外,即使是内存的问题,也只有在极少数情况下才会明显感觉到。
一款没有花哨设计的笔记本电脑,却因其色彩而与众不同。Matebook 的优势在于其强劲的处理器性能、绚丽的色彩和震撼的音效。另一方面,它的其他功能就没有那么奢华了。
MateBook 并不是没有替代品--如果你能忍受它的绿色和 3:2 长宽比的话。不过,几款替代产品的价格都要高出不少。Matebook 的价格约为 1,500 美元。三星的 Galaxy Book4 Pro和 联想 Yoga 9的价格与 Matebook 差不多。另一方面,价格稍低的是 宏碁 Swift Go 14.所有笔记本电脑的性能指标几乎没有差别。这意味着 Matebook 14 必须面对一些强劲的竞争对手。尽管如此,所有竞争对手都有自己独特的缺陷。
价格和供应情况
配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 处理器的新款 Matebook Pro 14 售价约为 1,500 美元。该产品尚未在美国上市。
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
- 06/19/2024 v8
Marc Herter
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.