惠普Pavilion Plus 14 Ryzen 7 笔记本电脑评测:所有正确位置的变化
2023 AMDPavilion Plus 14 是今年对 2022 英特尔机型的升级。 2022 英特尔型号该机型采用了全新的内部结构,并在外观上进行了多处改动。该型号不应与 Pavilion 1414 混为一谈,因为后者采用了相对较慢的处理器和较低端的选件。
我们的评测机是最高端的配置,配备 Zen 4 Ryzen 7 7840U CPU、16 GB 焊接内存和 120 Hz 1800p OLED 显示屏,零售价约为 920 美元。较低配置的 Ryzen 5 7540U 和 1200p IPS 显示屏的零售价为 550 美元,但所有选项都包括 16 GB 内存和集成显卡。
Pavilion Plus 14 的替代产品包括其他经济型多媒体笔记本电脑,如 华硕 VivoBook 14 系列, 联想 IdeaPad 14 系列, 戴尔 Inspiron 14 系列或 宏碁 Swift 3 14.
更多惠普评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.8 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18.8 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
85.4 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 18.3 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.2 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 R7 7840S, Radeon 780M | 1.3 kg | 13.9 mm | 14.50" | 2944x1840 | |
85.3 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y R7 7730U, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
87.2 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 18.87 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 | |
87.3 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 i5-12500H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 18.8 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 终于,灰色键帽
今年的设计有几处视觉更新。首先也是最明显的是键盘按键的颜色,从银色变成了灰色。这一改变直接解决了旧款Pavilion 上白色键盘背光与银色按键对比度差的问题,使每个按键更加清晰可见。其次,无论好坏,笔记本电脑正面边缘的压痕已被取消。这个压痕可以让手指在打开盖子时抓得更紧,因此取消这个压痕令人遗憾。最后,底板上的螺钉和扬声器网罩也进行了重新排列,以反映众多的内部变化。
机箱尺寸、重量和刚度与去年的机型基本相同,因为大部分外观变化都不大。虽然它并没有在轻薄方面赢得任何奖项,但愿意多花点钱的用户可以找到更便携的 14 英寸解决方案,如宏碁 Swift 3 SF314 或 华硕 ZenBook 14.
连接性 - 不支持 USB4
除了 MicroSD 插槽之外,该系统拥有去年机型的所有端口。取消读卡器可能是为了降低制造成本,也可能是为了鼓励用户使用惠普 QuickDrop。
由于采用了 Zen 4 CPU,我们原本希望能看到 USB4 支持,但遗憾的是,情况并非如此。你必须多花点钱购买惠普 Envy 或Spectre 型号 才能获得这样的功能。
交流
用户可以选择联发科 MT7921 或 MT7922,分别支持 Wi-Fi 6 或 Wi-Fi 6E。在我们的测试机上,当与 Wi-Fi 6E 接入点配对时,传输速率非常出色和可靠。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y |
网络摄像头
虽然惠普标榜配备 500 万像素网络摄像头,但 Windows 摄像头应用程序只允许用户选择高达 370 万像素的摄像头。所有配置都配备了红外和物理隐私快门。
维护
底部面板仅由四颗十字螺丝固定,便于维修。事实上,惠普是唯一一家为包括Pavilion Plus 14 在内的许多笔记本电脑发布完整拆卸视频的主要制造商之一。我们希望看到更多的制造商提供这样的服务,尤其是在涉及较大和较复杂的机型时。
如下图所示,2022 和 2023 机型在设计上存在一些差异。最明显的是,WLAN、固态硬盘和焊接内存模块的位置都有所调整,电池的体积也更大了。不过,除了单个 M.2 PCIe4 x4 固态硬盘插槽和 WLAN 模块外,与之前的设计一样,没有太多可升级的地方。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了交流适配器和文件外,没有其他附件。如果在美国购买,制造商通常提供一年有限保修。
输入设备
键盘
虽然按键反馈保持不变,以提供熟悉的键入体验,但惠普听取了我们对上一代机型银色键帽过于明亮,导致难以看清每个按键上的印刷图案的呼吁。在 2023 年,自然银配色现在配备了灰色键帽,更加清晰易读,而静谧粉和月光蓝配色仍将分别配备粉色和蓝色键帽。
触摸板
点击板尺寸与以前一样,仍为 12.5 x 8 厘米,手感相似。点击时发出的咔哒声令人满意,但行程很短,反馈也相对较弱。对于这么大的点击板,我们并不介意放弃一些空间来放置专用鼠标按键,就像一些 ZBook 机型以方便多点触控输入。
显示屏 - 经济实惠的 120 Hz OLED 显示屏
如下所述,有三种显示方式可供选择。我们的具体设备包括粗体选项。
- 1920 x 1200、IPS、300 nits、哑光、60 Hz、60% sRGB
- 2560 x 1600,IPS,300 尼特,雾面,120 赫兹,100% sRGB
- 2880 x 1800,OLED,400 尼特(500 尼特 HDR),亮面,120 赫兹,100% DCI-P3
2023 型号将刷新率从上一代型号的 90 赫兹固定刷新率升级为 120 赫兹固定刷新率或 120 赫兹动态刷新率。当检测不到运动时,动态设置可以低至 60 赫兹,以节省能耗,这与大多数新款智能手机上的 OLED 显示屏非常相似。除此之外,分辨率、色彩和亮度等其他方面均保持不变。OLED 的图像质量非常出色,这是意料之中的。
我们建议不要选择最低端的 1200p 显示屏,因为它的 45% NTSC 色彩范围非常窄。这种面板色彩暗淡,对比度较低,属于低端产品。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 384 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.06 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.49
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr Samsung SDC4170, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 LEN145WQ+, OLED, 2944x1840, 14.5" | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y Samsung ATNA40YK07-1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 InfoVision 140NWHE, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 Samsung SDC4171 (ATNA40YK07-0), OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -4% | 1% | -20% | -0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.8 | 99.9 0% | 97.1 -3% | 99.9 0% | 68.8 -31% | 98.05 -2% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.3 -1% | 99.63 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 95.8 | 98.9 3% | 86.5 -10% | 98.3 3% | 69.5 -27% | 97.22 1% |
Response Times | -41% | -3% | -48% | -3100% | -123% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.82 ? | 1.2 ? -46% | 0.77 ? 6% | 1.19 ? -45% | 32.8 ? -3900% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.95 ? | 1.4 ? -47% | 0.83 ? 13% | 1.62 ? -71% | 22.8 ? -2300% | 3 ? -216% |
PWM Frequency | 504.7 ? | 357 ? -29% | 360 ? -29% | 362.3 ? -28% | 360 -29% | |
Screen | -4% | 19% | 14% | -34% | -60% | |
Brightness middle | 384 | 388.3 1% | 387 1% | 336.6 -12% | 331.1 -14% | 389 1% |
Brightness | 386 | 391 1% | 388 1% | 339 -12% | 326 -16% | 389 1% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 98 0% | 98 0% | 98 0% | 85 -13% | 98 0% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.029 | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.06 | 4.51 -11% | 1.3 68% | 0.84 79% | 2.23 45% | 3.51 14% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.73 | 7.06 -5% | 2.6 61% | 3.1 54% | 5.44 19% | 6.87 -2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.49 | 0.63 -29% | 2.11 -331% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1.2 -9% | 1.3 -18% | 1.4 -27% | 3.6 -227% | 2.2 -100% |
Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.18 101% | 2.24 98% | 2.24 98% | 2.21 100% | 2.16 102% |
CCT | 6331 103% | 6290 103% | 6360 102% | 6439 101% | 6022 108% | 6320 103% |
Contrast | 1142 | 13414 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -15% /
-12% | 4% /
8% | -11% /
-5% | -1051% /
-541% | -61% /
-55% |
* ... smaller is better
开箱后,显示屏的校准效果已经相当不错,这在Pavilion 系列的经济型机型上实属罕见。平均灰度和色彩 deltaE 值分别仅为 1.1 和 2.23,适合大多数业余图形编辑用途。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.95 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.44 ms rise | |
↘ 0.51 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.82 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.43 ms rise | |
↘ 0.39 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 504.7 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 504.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 504.7 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
与大多数其他 OLED 面板类似,所有亮度级别都会出现闪烁现象。在所有亮度级别中,504 Hz 频率相对一致。
由于最大亮度没有增加,室外可视性并不比去年的机型更好或更差。超高亮度的 OLED 叠层基本上不可避免地会产生眩光。需要注意的是,虽然 IPS 配置是哑光的,但亮度也更低,只有 300 尼特,而不是 400 尼特。
性能 - AMD Zen 4 傲视群雄
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为 "性能 "模式。请注意,即使 Windows 设置为 "性能 "模式,MyHP 软件的 "散热设置 "仍将保持 "平衡 "模式,惠普称这是Pavilion 系列有意为之。
处理器
... Ryzen 7 7840U是目前最快的 Zen 4 U 系列 CPU。它的性能仅为 酷睿 i7-12700H在去年的Pavilion Plus 14 中,它的性能仅为 Core i7-12700H 的 5%,而功耗仅为 Core i7-12700H 的几分之一。选择性能较低的 SKU Ryzen 5 7530U将影响多线程性能约 30%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (17924 - 25901, n=10) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (78360 - 109745, n=10) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (3519 - 4847, n=10) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (83206 - 114294, n=10) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (11969 - 14822, n=10) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (40720 - 58482, n=10) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (53018 - 166333, n=10) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (801 - 1047, n=10) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (9347 - 13846, n=10) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (26622 - 38173, n=10) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y |
系统性能
PCMark 测试结果普遍高于去年的机型,尤其是在生产力和数字内容创建子测试中,AMD 配置的固态硬盘和 GPU 性能更快。不过,在 Essentials 子测试中,英特尔Pavilion 仍占优势,这可能是由于其更快的初始 Turbo Boost 潜能。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (5866 - 7157, n=10) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (9068 - 11081, n=10) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (7323 - 10099, n=10) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (7204 - 8987, n=10) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1256 - 1804, n=10) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1261 - 1798, n=10) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1251 - 1835, n=10) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1082 - 1775, n=10) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y |
PCMark 10 Score | 6480 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (43255 - 70532, n=11) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (37399 - 61602, n=10) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (49426 - 92289, n=12) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (90 - 137.2, n=11) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开我们主页的多个标签页时,LatencyMon 显示了 DPC 问题。值得庆幸的是,60 FPS 下的 4K 视频播放效果非常出色,仅有一帧掉帧记录,这一点我们无法对其他几款 AMD PC.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配有 1 TB 西部数据 SN810PCIe4 NVMe 固态硬盘,这是一款中高档硬盘,连续读写速度分别高达 6600 MB/s 和 5000 MB/s。遗憾的是,正如下面的 DiskSpd 读取循环结果所示,Pavilion Plus 14 中的硬盘在短短几分钟的压力下就会降到 310 MB/s。即使重复测试,这些结果也不会改变,这表明固态硬盘散热不良。因此,固态硬盘的最大传输速率最多只能达到一到两分钟,然后就会出现节流。
联想联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11配备了相同的西部数据 SN810 固态硬盘的联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 也存在与惠普硬盘类似的性能问题。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl -11! | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU 性能 - 3200 MHz 内存导致 Radeon 780M 运行缓慢
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M主要是 Radeon 680M 的重新命名,但与英特尔目前最快的集成式 Iris Xe 96 EUs解决方案。在这种情况下,3DMark 分数比 2022Pavilion Plus 14 中的 Iris Xe 96 EUs 高出 40% 至 60%。
不过,图形性能比我们数据库中配备相同 Radeon 780M GPU 的普通笔记本电脑要慢 10%到 15%。这可能要归咎于Pavilion Plus 14 中相对较慢的 3200 MHz 内存,因为大多数其他笔记本电脑都配备了 4800 MHz 或更快的内存。
如下表 3DMark 11 结果所示,在电池供电或平衡模式下运行时,性能不会明显下降。
电源配置文件 | 物理得分 | 图形得分 | 综合得分 |
电池电量 | 17363 | 10798 | 6730 |
平衡模式 | 17686 | 11654 | 6898 |
性能模式 | 17401 | 11840 | 6920 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 11571 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6015 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2597 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
如果您必须使用集成显卡进行游戏,那么目前没有比 Radeon 780M 更好的了。它足够强大,能以稳定的 60 FPS 运行《DOTA 2》等要求不高的游戏,甚至能以类似 Playstation 4 的 1080p 和 30 FPS 运行较新的游戏。
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (62.6 - 151.2, n=23) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (34.3 - 77.7, n=23) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (28.4 - 55.9, n=23) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (18.6 - 38.8, n=23) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (16.5 - 31.3, n=23) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 136.1 | 56.3 | 20.4 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 117.3 | 85.9 | 45 | 26.1 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 119.3 | 101.4 | 66.7 | 62 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 62.6 | 32.7 | 24.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 40 | 29.9 | 25.4 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 58 | 34 | 32 | 29 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 141.9 | 61.1 | 49.8 | 43.4 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 26.3 | 20.7 | 15.1 | 14.2 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 44.3 | 28.6 | 21.4 | 17.2 |
F1 22 (2022) | 68.9 | 59.3 | 45.3 | 11.4 |
排放量
系统噪音
风扇噪音与 2022 型号大致相同,但在脉动行为上存在一些差异。例如,我们的 AMD 系统在运行时可能会以更快的速度达到更高的转速。 Witcher 3但老款英特尔机型在 CPU 使用率较高的情况下,转速会更高。无论在哪种情况下,我们的 AMD 设备都比其他 14 英寸笔记本电脑安静,噪音约为 26.4 dB(A),只有在运行浏览器或视频流等更典型的负载时,噪音才会偶尔达到 33.4 dB(B)。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.1 / 24.1 / 25.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 33.4 / 39.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.4 dB(A) |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB | HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, SK Hynix BC711 HFM256GD3GX013N | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840S, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y Vega 8, R7 7730U, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N | Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-12500H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 2% | -12% | -7% | -12% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 23.4 | 23.3 -0% | 24.5 -5% | 22.6 3% | 23.2 1% | 25.15 -7% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.1 | 23.5 2% | 24.5 -2% | 22.6 6% | 23.2 4% | 25.15 -4% |
Idle Average * | 24.1 | 23.5 2% | 24.5 -2% | 22.6 6% | 23.2 4% | 25.15 -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.3 | 23.5 7% | 27.7 -9% | 22.6 11% | 23.2 8% | 25.15 1% |
Load Average * | 33.4 | 32 4% | 45.5 -36% | 40.7 -22% | 47.5 -42% | 35.6 -7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.4 | 35.3 10% | 45.5 -15% | 46.6 -18% | 51.7 -31% | |
Load Maximum * | 39.4 | 44.3 -12% | 45.5 -15% | 52.5 -33% | 51.7 -31% | 40.3 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
与去年的酷睿 H 系列机型一样,笔记本电脑右半部分的表面温度要高于左半部分。不过,这次的热点温度略低几摄氏度,这可能是因为我们的 Ryzen U 系列 CPU 要求较低。其他机型,如更薄的 联想 Yoga Slim 7 14键盘温度可达 44 摄氏度,底部温度可达 56 摄氏度。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.3 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.2 °C / 84.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.4 °C / -0.8 F).
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840S, AMD Radeon 780M | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 Intel Core i5-12500H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -1% | -18% | -14% | -7% | -18% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39 | 39.4 -1% | 43.8 -12% | 39.4 -1% | 40 -3% | 43 -10% |
Maximum Bottom * | 35.8 | 33.8 6% | 56 -56% | 43.2 -21% | 36.4 -2% | 45.6 -27% |
Idle Upper Side * | 25.2 | 25 1% | 25.3 -0% | 28.6 -13% | 27 -7% | 29.5 -17% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.6 | 27.6 -8% | 26.7 -4% | 30.6 -20% | 29.2 -14% | 30.3 -18% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力测试时,CPU 仅在前 10 秒钟内将频率提升至 3.4 GHz,功耗为 30 W,然后降至 2.8 GHz,功耗为 25 W,温度稳定在 80 C。如果要达到最高的持续性能,最好使用固定的 30 W,但对于大多数使用 U 系列 CPU 的笔记本电脑来说,情况通常并非如此。
运行 Witcher 3 以代表典型的游戏负载,也会出现较低的核心温度。我们的 AMD CPU 将稳定在 77 摄氏度,而 2022 英特尔型号则为 84 摄氏度,尽管 AMD 具有上述性能优势。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 40 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.8 | -- | 80 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | ~2.5 | 1304 | 81 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 0.4 | 1833 | 77 |
发言人
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - Zen 4 的真正优势
耗电量
功耗是该系统真正的亮点。AMD 设备完成 CineBench R15 多线程基准测试的时间与去年的英特尔设备基本相同,而功耗仅为英特尔设备的一半。同样,运行 Witcher 3在 AMD 或英特尔机型上运行,功耗各约为 42 瓦,尽管 AMD 机型的帧速率要高出 60% 至 100%。与第 12 代英特尔酷睿 H 处理器相比,Zen 4 的每瓦性能优势不可低估。
当 CPU 的使用率达到 100% 时,我们可以测量到 65 W USB-C 交流适配器(约 8.8 x 4.9 x 2.8 厘米)的临时最大功耗为 51 W。
Off / Standby | 0.34 / 0.5 Watt |
Idle | 6 / 6.5 / 13.9 Watt |
Load |
41.9 / 50.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, WDC PC SN810 1TB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix BC711 HFM256GD3GX013N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 R7 7840S, Radeon 780M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2944x1840, 14.5" | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y R7 7730U, Vega 8, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 i5-12500H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -26% | -36% | -19% | -91% | -20% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6 | 5.6 7% | 8.7 -45% | 7.9 -32% | 6.3 -5% | 6.1 -2% |
Idle Average * | 6.5 | 6.1 6% | 11.3 -74% | 8.8 -35% | 10.3 -58% | 6.8 -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 13.9 | 19.4 -40% | 12 14% | 14.7 -6% | 20 -44% | 15 -8% |
Load Average * | 41.9 | 62.7 -50% | 58.6 -40% | 46.9 -12% | 106.2 -153% | 45 -7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.9 | 43.8 -0% | 61.6 -40% | 44.9 -2% | 96.1 -119% | 47.1 -7% |
Load Maximum * | 50.8 | 90 -77% | 66.2 -30% | 65.2 -28% | 136.5 -169% | 97 -91% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
惠普将电池容量从去年Pavilion Plus 14 的 51 Wh 提高到了最新 AMD 版本的 68 Wh。再加上效率更高的 Ryzen U 系列 CPU,实际 WLAN 浏览时间从 4.5 小时增加到 8.5 小时,电池续航时间几乎增加了两倍。
不过,电池充电速度相对较慢。从空电充至满电需要近 2.5 小时,而其他大多数超极本只需 1.5 小时。
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh | HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 51 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 R7 7840S, Radeon 780M, 70 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y R7 7730U, Vega 8, 75 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 64 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 i5-12500H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 57 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -41% | -18% | 39% | -34% | -43% | |
Reader / Idle | 1011 | 506 -50% | 1107 9% | 712 -30% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 510 | 274 -46% | 571 12% | 725 42% | 432 -15% | 312 -39% |
Load | 122 | 89 -27% | 64 -48% | 203 66% | 54 -56% | 66 -46% |
H.264 | 690 | 426 |
Pros
Cons
结论:我们最喜欢的Pavilion 笔记本电脑
推荐昂贵的笔记本电脑很容易,但推荐廉价的笔记本电脑就比较麻烦了,因为会有一些偷工减料和暗箱操作的成本节约措施。Pavilion Plus 14 是我们见过的零售价低于 1000 美元的 14 英寸笔记本电脑中最好的一款。全面的 Zen 4 Ryzen 7 CPU 和 120 Hz OLED 显示屏帮助该机型全面胜任多媒体、游戏、编辑、旅行、文字处理和图形工作,满足了绝大多数休闲家庭用户或预算紧张的学生的需求。
Ryzen 7 CPU 尤其是惠普系统的许多优势所在。它的每瓦性能远远高于去年机型的酷睿 i7-12700H,因此我们的 AMD 系统运行起来更凉爽、更持久,同时还能提供更快的游戏性能。这种差异甚至不是微小的,因为它们可以显著提高几个小时或每秒几十帧的速度。
最新的Pavilion Plus 14 在各方面都很出色,这在很大程度上要归功于 Zen 4 CPU 和 1800p OLED 显示屏。
不足之处包括缺少 USB4、取消了 MicroSD 读卡器,以及 3200 MHz 的焊接内存速度较慢,对 GPU 性能略有影响。主板上有两个风扇,但在 Ryzen 7 配置中只有一个处于活动状态,留下了大量的死角,本可以更好地利用这些死角来实现额外的功能或更好的散热效果。与此同时,需要独立性能的用户将不得不关注竞争对手 华硕 VivoBook 14X或 戴尔 Inspiron 14 Plus来代替。不过,如果这些问题都没有困扰你,那么Pavilion Plus 14 值得你放入购物车。
价格和供应情况
惠普目前正在出货的 2023Pavilion Plus 14 有多种配置,Ryzen 5/1200p 配置的起价为 550 美元,我们评测的 Ryzen 7/1800p 配置的起价为 920 美元。
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
- 11/14/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.