联想 Yoga 9 2 合 1 14IMH9 评测:更小、更轻、更快的 Arc 图形处理器
不要与 Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9,Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 是 Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IRP8 的直接继承者。 Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IRP8 的直接继承者。.它的外观设计有了新的变化,CPU 也采用了 Meteor Lake 处理器,取代了去年的 Raptor Lake 处理器。Yoga 9 系列是联想面向普通消费者推出的最高端笔记本电脑,与之相比,Yoga 7 系列或 IdeaPad 系列价格更实惠。
我们的评测机配置了 16GB LPDDR5x-7467 内存和 2.8K (2880 1800) 120 Hz OLED 触摸屏,售价约为 1550 美元。更贵的机型可配备双倍内存和 4K(3840 x 2400)60 Hz OLED 触摸屏,但目前所有机型均配备相同的酷睿 7 155H CPU 和集成 Arc 8 图形处理器。
Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 的替代产品包括其他旗舰级子笔记本,如 惠普 Spectre x360 14, LG Gram 14 2-in-1或 华硕 ZenBook 14 Flip.
更多联想评测:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90.5 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.3 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.25 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.3 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
85.2 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.6 kg | 18.99 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 | |
86.7 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
91.4 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.5 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
表壳 - 边框全面变薄
CNC 铝制机箱又回来了,但做了一些调整。最明显的是,盖子的侧面和底部变小了,边框略微变窄。如下图所示,当合上时,底座和盖子之间的尺寸差异非常明显,因为底座显得更宽更圆。这与其他大多数笔记本电脑形成鲜明对比,后者在关闭状态下,盖子和底座的边缘是齐平的。
下一个物理变化与网络摄像头的顶部边缘有关,它现在比以前更加突出。与去年设计的 200 万像素网络摄像头相比,顶部边框的这一加厚部分使得 500 万像素网络摄像头更加先进。它还使盖子更容易抓握和打开,尤其是与 惠普 Spectre x360 14设计。
长度和宽度比以前更小,从而减轻了重量,提高了便携性。最值得注意的是,该机型比同类产品 Spectre x360 14 轻了约 200 克,考虑到二合一的外形,这比人们想象的差别要大。
连接性
2023 设计中的所有端口都过渡到了 2024 版本,包括双 Thunderbolt 4 端口。与竞争对手相比,该系统明显集成了更多的 USB-C 端口,如 ZenBook 14或 Inspiron 14 Plus 7440.不过,HDMI 端口和 SD 卡插槽却没有配备。
交流
标配的英特尔 AX211 支持 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.3 连接。虽然 Wi-Fi 6 的传输速率可能会更高,但性能非常可靠。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 |
网络摄像头
新的 500 万像素网络摄像头无疑比旧款上的 200 万像素传感器能生成更清晰的图像。即便如此,色彩仍未得到改善,与惠普最新笔记本电脑上的 900 万像素传感器相比仍有一定差距。
标配红外和物理快门。
维护
底部面板仅用四颗 Torx 螺钉固定。即便如此,维修起来还是比想象的要困难得多,因为面板的边缘与底座的连接非常紧密。出于同样的原因,试图重新安装面板的过程也更加令人恼火。我们在去年的设计中也遇到了同样的问题。
内存和无线局域网仍采用焊接方式。不过,正如下面的对比图片所示,存储设备现在仅限于 42 毫米 NVMe 固态硬盘,而去年的设计最多可支持 80 毫米硬盘。
配件和保修
零售包装盒包括一个织物便携套和联想超薄笔,以及相关文件和交流适配器。遗憾的是,这支笔非常不符合人体工程学,因为它太小了,握起来不舒服,而它的集成按钮在按下时又太软了。对于集成了笔槽的旧款 Yoga 来说,小尺寸的笔是可以理解的,但现在笔不再位于 Yoga 机箱内,就没有理由不配备更大、质量更高的触控笔了。例如,微软的 Surface Pen 就比联想的 Slim Pen 更厚、更易握。
在美国购买时,制造商提供标准的一年有限保修服务。
输入设备 - 更大的辅助键
键盘
联想对键盘右侧边缘的辅助键进行了加倍处理,我们对去年的设计褒贬不一。现在,这些按键的尺寸更大,功能也与以前不同,其中包括一个新的用户自定义键,以增加自定义功能。不过,由于这些按键的位置与其他大多数笔记本电脑的退格键、回车键和方向键的位置相同,因此还是很容易误触。
QWERTY 主键 不变在触感和反馈方面与 2022 Yoga 9i 14 笔记本电脑相似。 2022 Yoga 9i 14.空格键的声音明显比键盘上的其他按键要大。
触摸板
点击板尺寸增至 13.5 x 8 厘米,对于 14 英寸机型来说非常宽敞。Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 的点击板 Inspiron 14 Plus 7440例如,相比之下,Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 的点击板 "只有 "11.5 x 8 厘米。即使在较慢的速度下滑行,也几乎没有粘滞感。咔哒声也很响亮,反馈力度比其他大多数超极本都要大,让人感觉更满意。尖锐的 "咔嗒 "声可能有点响,但我们认为这不是问题。
显示屏 - 明显的颗粒感
显示屏刷新率从去年的 90 Hz 提高到了 120 Hz。除此之外,其他一切似乎都没有变化,包括全 P3 色彩、1800p 分辨率和 OLED 面板。 如果能支持 Windows 可变刷新率就更好了,这样 Yoga 9 2-in-1 14 就能更好地区别于其他产品,如 Spectre x360 14或同样配备 1800p120 OLED 显示屏的 ZenBook 14。
支持 HDR500。在播放 HDR 内容时,我们能记录到 567 尼特的最大亮度,而在 SDR 模式下则为 372 尼特。与往常一样,如果使用电池供电,HDR 模式将被禁用。
遗憾的是,显示屏出现了 摩尔效应。这意味着,尽管有光泽覆盖和高像素密度,显示屏还是会出现颗粒感。虽然没有严重到让人分心的程度,但如果把它与其他 OLED 笔记本电脑(如 华硕 ZenBook 14.如果你想获得 "最清晰 "的 OLED 体验,那么你必须把目光投向 Yoga 9 2-in-1 14 以外的产品。
需要注意的是,显示屏默认设置为 60 Hz,因此用户需要通过 Windows 手动启用 120 Hz 模式。
|
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 371.6 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.91 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.59
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 LEN140WUXGA, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 BOE NV14N44, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA ATNA40CU06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 0% | -19% | 0% | -3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.8 | 99.9 0% | 99.8 0% | 69.3 -31% | 99.8 0% | 99.8 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.5 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.3 | 98.3 1% | 97.3 0% | 71.4 -27% | 97.6 0% | 89.3 -8% |
Response Times | 8% | -50% | -3803% | 48% | 43% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.8 ? | 1.04 ? -30% | 1.78 ? -123% | 41 ? -5025% | 0.69 ? 14% | 0.77 ? 4% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1 ? | 0.95 ? 5% | 2.3 ? -130% | 26.8 ? -2580% | 0.71 ? 29% | 0.75 ? 25% |
PWM Frequency | 240.5 ? | 360 ? 50% | 489.7 ? 104% | 480 ? 100% | 480 100% | |
Screen | 13% | 18% | -8% | 33% | 29% | |
Brightness middle | 371.6 | 378 2% | 388.3 4% | 403.2 9% | 391 5% | 378 2% |
Brightness | 373 | 379 2% | 388 4% | 388 4% | 392 5% | 384 3% |
Brightness Distribution | 99 | 98 -1% | 97 -2% | 93 -6% | 98 -1% | 97 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.03 | 0.27 | 0.02 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.91 | 2.5 49% | 4.4 10% | 4.15 15% | 1.1 78% | 1.4 71% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.33 | 4.7 44% | 7.37 12% | 6.92 17% | 2.4 71% | 2.2 74% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.59 | 1.9 -19% | 0.64 60% | 1.04 35% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 1.9 14% | 1.4 36% | 5.1 -132% | 1.3 41% | 1.7 23% |
Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.2 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.2 100% | 2.17 101% | 2.17 101% |
CCT | 6120 106% | 6222 104% | 6339 103% | 6677 97% | 6336 103% | 6256 104% |
Contrast | 12600 | 1493 | 19550 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
9% | -11% /
-2% | -1277% /
-643% | 27% /
29% | 23% /
24% |
* ... smaller is better
显示器开箱即按照 P3 标准校准,平均灰度和色彩 deltaE 值分别仅为 2.2 和 4.91。在灰度和色温保持不变的情况下,自行校准面板可以改善色彩。我们的校准 ICM 配置文件可在上面免费下载。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.43 ms rise | |
↘ 0.57 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.38 ms rise | |
↘ 0.42 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.5 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
所有亮度级别都有脉宽调制,频率稳定在 240 赫兹。这可能会让对闪烁敏感的用户感到头痛。
与上一代产品相比,该产品的室外可视性没有改善,因此与其他 14 英寸的子笔记本电脑相比仍属一般。由于采用了光面屏幕,眩光基本上是不可避免的,但由于采用了 OLED 面板,色彩的保持比大多数 IPS 产品要好一些。
性能 - 关于流星湖 CPU 的一切
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将联想 Vantage 设置为性能模式。Vantage UI 在今年早些时候进行了更新,在切换功能时更易于阅读,也更加直观。
处理器
从 酷睿 i7-1360P 跳转到今年的 酷睿至尊 7 155H多线程性能将提升 20%,而单线程性能则保持不变。不过,只运行两次 CineBench R15,多线程性能就会下降约 20%,这也是我们在去年的 Yoga 9 14IRP8 上观察到的情况。
Ryzen 7 8845HS Ryzen 7 8845HS是酷睿至尊 7 155H 的竞争对手,两者都集成了 NPU,可加速人工智能任务。不过,本地 NPU 加速仍处于起步阶段,截至本文撰写时,应用还很少。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=45) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=45) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=45) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=45) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=45) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=45) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=45) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=45) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=45) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=45) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 |
压力测试
运行 Prime95 时,CPU 会在几秒钟内飙升至 3.1 GHz 和 66 W,直到核心温度达到 105 C。此后,时钟频率和主板功耗会下降并分别稳定在 2.4 GHz 和 39 W,以维持 80 C 的核心温度。在 Inspiron 14 Plus 7440将使 CPU 稳定在稍高的时钟频率(约 2.7 GHz)和主板功耗(44 W),但核心温度要高得多,达到 100 C。
如下面的截图所示,在平衡模式下重复上述测试将导致全面降低。CPU 时钟频率、温度和电路板功耗将分别降至 1.6 GHz、71 C 和 25 W。
GPU 时钟频率和温度 Witcher 3分别为 2.0 GHz 和 74 C,而上述戴尔系统的频率为 1.8 至 2.3 GHz。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 53 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.4 | -- | 80 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | ~1.7 | 450 - 1500 | 75 |
Witcher 3 应力 | ~1.1 | ~2000 | 74 |
系统性能
PCMark 分数明显高于许多采用相同 Core Ultra 7 CPU 的竞争机型。这部分归功于快于平均水平的 7467 MHz 内存,它影响了 iGPU 的性能。例如,Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 的系统内存为 6400 MHz,速度稍慢。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5159 - 7529, n=32) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8580 - 11289, n=32) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (7822 - 10591, n=32) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (4985 - 10709, n=32) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=32) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1291 - 1798, n=31) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=31) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (939 - 1802, n=31) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (252 - 299, n=32) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (234 - 309, n=27) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (517 - 614, n=33) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7529 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=45) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=45) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=45) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (120.2 - 233, n=45) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签页时,LatencyMon 会显示轻微的 DPC 问题。在一分钟的测试视频中,4K 视频播放也会出现轻微的跳帧。这些问题还不足以引起注意,但对于使用酷睿 Ultra 7 CPU 的系统来说,完全没有跳帧应该是最理想的状态。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试机配备了中端 三星 MZAL81T0HDLBPCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘。6200 MB/s 的传输速率比去年机型上的 SK Hynix 硬盘略慢。至少性能节流不是问题,而 42 毫米的小型硬盘通常不会出现这种情况。
如上所述,与市场上绝大多数笔记本电脑不同,新款 Yoga 9 14 G9 不支持全长 2280 NVMe SSD。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能 - Arc 功能强大,足以支持 1080p 游戏
英特尔弧 8大约比 Iris Xe 96 EUs快 50%至 60%。性能的提升足以使新的英特尔 iGPU 与竞争对手 Radeon 780M不相上下。
F1 22 》在高设置下会崩溃,这是我们在 AMD Radeon 680M 或 780M 系统上从未遇到过的情况。
电源配置文件 | 图形分数 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 8331 | 24874 | 3026 |
均衡模式 | 8613 (+3%) | 20691 (-17%) | 3033 (-0%) |
电池电量 | 8255 (-1%) | 24424 (-2%) | 2896 (-4%) |
在平衡模式下运行对 CPU 性能的影响大于对 GPU 性能的影响,如我们上述Fire Strike 结果所示。不过,需要注意的是,只要开启性能模式,在电池电量充足的情况下也能实现全部性能。
3DMark 11 Performance | 13455 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 32396 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7566 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3260 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (44.9 - 54.6, n=11) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (35.3 - 45, n=11) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (24.7 - 31.6, n=11) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (20.2 - 25.9, n=11) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (34.5 - 58, n=15) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (11.3 - 38, n=33) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (9.42 - 31.4, n=30) | |
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (7.3 - 27.6, n=32) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (13 - 24.7, n=24) |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 126.5 | 124.1 | 36.9 | 13.3 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 132.9 | 88.4 | 54.3 | 24.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 98.9 | 75.6 | 67.2 | 63.6 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 56.9 | 36.5 | 24.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 58 | 46 | 36.9 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 63 | 39 | 37 | 35 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 151.6 | 66 | 56.4 | 44.3 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 47.3 | 35.3 | 24.7 | 20.2 |
F1 22 (2022) | 72.1 | 66.6 | ||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 29.1 | 23.5 | 21.2 | 19 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 32.4 | 26.3 | 22.8 | 20.5 |
排放 - 无恼人的脉动
系统噪音
风扇噪音底限和上限与我们在 2023 型号分别为 23.6 分贝(A)和 46 分贝(A)。不过,2024 型号在达到最大转速之前能够保持更长时间的安静。例如,在运行 3DMark 06 时,风扇噪音在第一个基准场景结束时仅为 35 dB(A),而去年的机型为 45 dB(A)。运行 Witcher 3在平衡模式和性能模式下,代表典型游戏负载的运行噪音也明显降低。直到使用 Prime95 和 FurMark 对 CPU 施加压力时,我们才记录到 46 分贝(A)的最大值。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.6 / 23.6 / 25 dB(A) |
Load |
| 34.8 / 46.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.2 dB(A) |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV2T04 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -6% | -4% | -9% | 1% | 10% | |
off / environment * | 23.2 | 23.6 -2% | 23.8 -3% | 23.6 -2% | 23.4 -1% | 23.4 -1% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.6 | 23.6 -0% | 23.9 -1% | 23.7 -0% | 23.4 1% | 23.4 1% |
Idle Average * | 23.6 | 23.6 -0% | 24 -2% | 23.7 -0% | 23.4 1% | 23.4 1% |
Idle Maximum * | 25 | 24.6 2% | 27.9 -12% | 27 -8% | 24.5 2% | 25.6 -2% |
Load Average * | 34.8 | 45 -29% | 35.9 -3% | 41.8 -20% | 39.3 -13% | 25.6 26% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.7 | 45 -19% | 42.1 -12% | 45.7 -21% | 35.9 5% | 30.9 18% |
Load Maximum * | 46.2 | 45 3% | 42.7 8% | 50.7 -10% | 39.3 15% | 32.6 29% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于内部采用了对称散热解决方案,温度的发展是对称的。因此,与 Spectre x360 14 或 Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 不同,热点最靠近键盘中心。 Inspiron 14 Plus 7440和 Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 不同,它们的热点分别偏向机箱的右半部分和左半部分。此外,三款笔记本电脑的最高表面温度在 40 至 45 摄氏度之间。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.4 °C / 77.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+2.7 °C / 4.9 F).
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 10% | 20% | 13% | 11% | 14% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 40 | 39.7 1% | 32.2 19% | 39.2 2% | 40.9 -2% | 39.3 2% |
Maximum Bottom * | 43 | 45.4 -6% | 39 9% | 41 5% | 46.8 -9% | 45 -5% |
Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 25.7 20% | 24.2 24% | 25.4 21% | 24.1 25% | 23.8 26% |
Idle Bottom * | 35.2 | 26.4 25% | 25.6 27% | 26.8 24% | 24.6 30% | 24 32% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
运行 Witcher 3尽管图形性能提高了 50%,但其所需功耗约为 51 瓦,仅比 Yoga 9 14IRP G8 高出几瓦。虽然比我们在 ZenBook 14 或 Spectre x360 14 上记录的要求更高,但联想的每瓦性能仍然比上一代 Iris Xe 显卡令人印象深刻。使用 AMD 780M 的笔记本电脑,如 ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2在功耗方面大致相当。
当 CPU 的利用率达到 100%时,我们可以记录到小巧(约 9 x 4.5 x 2.7 厘米)的 65 W USB-C 交流适配器的最大功耗为 69 W。由于游戏已经占用了交流适配器近 80% 的输出功率,因此当同时运行高负荷负载时,充电速度可能会变慢。
(编者注:本月晚些时候,当我们的 Metrahit Energy 万用表维修完毕后,我们将更新本节内容。不便之处,敬请谅解。)
Off / Standby | 0.35 / 0.46 Watt |
Idle | 4.2 / 7.1 / 12.9 Watt |
Load |
58.9 / 66.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, , OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV2T04, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -23% | 12% | -9% | -7% | 30% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.2 | 7.8 -86% | 3.4 19% | 3.5 17% | 6.1 -45% | 3.2 24% |
Idle Average * | 7.1 | 9.3 -31% | 5.5 23% | 7.9 -11% | 10 -41% | 4.2 41% |
Idle Maximum * | 12.9 | 9.8 24% | 12.4 4% | 8.8 32% | 10.3 20% | 4.9 62% |
Load Average * | 58.9 | 62.8 -7% | 49.8 15% | 66.4 -13% | 53.3 10% | 40.5 31% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.5 | 46.5 6% | 44.6 10% | 55.7 -13% | 42 15% | 37.9 23% |
Load Maximum * | 66.7 | 96 -44% | 65.3 2% | 110.3 -65% | 67 -0% | 68.6 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
无线局域网的运行时间比以前延长了约两个小时,共计 10 个小时。电池续航时间的延长与其他酷睿 Ultra 笔记本电脑的情况一致,运行时间普遍逐年提高。当然,与 Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 上的 IPS 面板相比,由于采用 OLED 面板,电池续航时间的差异会更大。
通过联想 Vantage 启用快速充电功能后,从空电到满电大约需要 90 分钟。
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 65 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 64 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 68 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -17% | -11% | 47% | 31% | 16% | |
Reader / Idle | 855 | 925 8% | 1971 131% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 600 | 472 -21% | 508 -15% | 749 25% | 707 18% | 555 -7% |
Load | 93 | 81 -13% | 70 -25% | 78 -16% | 134 44% | 129 39% |
H.264 | 651 | 1010 | 999 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 前进三步,后退一步
2024 Yoga 9 二合一 14 在以下几个关键方面进行了改进 2023 版.最重要的是采用了更高效的 Meteor-Lake 处理器,多线程性能比旧款提高了 20%,图形性能提高了 50%。其次是体积更小,重量更轻,便携性更强。与前几代产品相比,喜欢随时随地玩游戏或编辑的用户可能会觉得新款 Yoga 9 2-in-1 14 值得一试。
另一方面,新机型保留了上一代产品的许多主要缺点。最明显的是 OLED 显示屏略有颗粒感,保留了我们在 2023 机型上注意到的摩尔纹效果。底部面板仍然很难拆卸和重新安装,而一列大的辅助按键对打字员来说则是一个复杂的问题。与其他绝大多数 14 英寸笔记本电脑相比,2024 型号不再支持 80 毫米 M.2 固态硬盘。
与上一代产品相比,联想 Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 更小、更轻、更快、更持久。不过,在硬件方面仍存在一些不便之处,如维修性和显示屏颗粒感。
如果你看重可折叠外形和 OLED 触摸屏,那么HP Spectre x360 14或 华硕 ZenBook 14 Flip 2 合 1可以提供类似的体验,但 OLED 显示屏更清晰,尤其是它们现在都采用了相同的 Meteor Lake 处理器和 1800p 分辨率。
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9
- 04/08/2024 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.