Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 与 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H 评测:配备触摸显示屏、摄像头和 OCuLink 的 AI 迷你 PC
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 结合了 英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 185H与 32 GB DDR5 内存和 1 TB SSD 相结合的时尚机箱。说到机箱,Minisforum 采用了一种新方法,为 AtomMan X7 Ti 配备了一个 4 英寸触摸屏,用于显示最重要的系统参数。此外,还配备了摄像头和大量外围设备连接选项。凭借这一整体概念,Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 成为了强有力的竞争者,在实际应用中的适用范围远远超过竞争对手。在我们测试的版本中,这款来自远东的迷你电脑售价 959 欧元,而且还有裸机可供选择。制造商目前的售价为 759 欧元。
现在我们来看看 Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 在性能方面与竞争对手的对比情况。我们在下表中列出了对比设备的概况。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Memory | Weight | Height |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | 32768 MB | 863 g | 48.6 mm |
87.3 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 750 g | 52.3 mm |
83.4 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 32768 MB | 768 g | 57 mm |
84.1 % | 04 / 2024 | Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 545 g | 37 mm |
82.6 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 417 g | 38 mm |
82.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 615 g | 55 mm |
82.3 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 600 g | 58 mm |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 详细介绍
外壳 - 金属外壳和 4 英寸触摸显示屏
乍一看,Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 让我们想起了 Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX。但仔细一看,两者还是有明显区别的,单从尺寸上就能看出其基础机箱完全不同。Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 更大,尺寸与 Acemagic F2A 相当。不过,Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 由于采用垂直或略微倾斜的安装方式,占用的桌面空间要小得多。如果要使用内置摄像头,垂直安装是没有办法的。不过,水平操作也是可行的。底座无需工具即可安装,因为设备与底座连接在一起。倾斜角度也可以改变,这在使用内置摄像头时非常重要。不过,如果倾斜角度太平,设备很快就会向后倾倒。
Minisforum 在材料的选择上混合使用了金属和塑料。在底部和正面可以看到后者,正面还有一个 4 英寸的触摸显示屏。这里显示的是最重要的系统参数。还可以选择显示当前时间。不过,设备关闭时不会显示任何内容。这是一个遗憾,因为在关机模式下显示时间肯定是一个有用的选项。Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 的做工无可挑剔。
功能 - 许多连接,几乎没有什么可期待的
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 拥有大量外部接口。在 USB 端口方面,我们总共发现了六个接口,其中两个提供 USB4 标准。屏幕可以通过 HDMI、DisplayPort 或 USB4 连接,这意味着测试样品可以同时处理多达四个屏幕。作为一项特殊功能,Minisforum 在 AtomMan X7 Ti 上安装了 OCuLink 连接,可直接通过 PCIe 连接到外部显卡。与 USB4 相比,OCuLink 提供了更高的带宽。在接下来的测试中,我们将重点关注这一点,并看看与 eGPU 结合使用时的性能。 GPD G1.我们不想完全不提 SD 读卡器。遗憾的是,它只能提供 USB 2.0 的速度,因此在我们的对比中明显慢于竞争对手。使用面部识别或指纹传感器可以方便地登录操作系统。经过快速、简便的设置后,两种方法均可使用。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Khadas Mind (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom A5 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom A7 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom Mini IT13 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Mini PC (15.1 - 214, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Khadas Mind (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom A7 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom A5 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom Mini IT13 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Mini PC (18.2 - 221, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
交流
在 Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 中,我们看到了与 Acemagic F2A 相同的无线模块。英特尔 Wi-Fi 7 BE200 无线局域网模块可在 2.4 GHz、5 GHz 和 6 GHz 频率范围内工作。它甚至支持最新的 Wi-Fi 标准(Wi-Fi 7)。不过,相比之下,我们的测试样品比 Acemagic 型号的效果要好得多。由于我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器进行 Wi-Fi 测试,因此还无法显示 Wi-Fi 7 的测试结果。一旦我们更新了测试设备,我们将重新进行这项测试并提供测试结果。
网络摄像头
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 是少数配备摄像头的微型电脑之一。它安装了一个 1080p 网络摄像头,还可以登录系统(Windows Hello)。不过,摄像头的质量并不理想,因为在光线不足的情况下很快就会出现图像噪点。内置摄像头当然可以用作应急解决方案,至于是否要将微型电脑直接放在你面前,那就是个人喜好的问题了。
配件
供货范围包括设备、120 瓦电源装置和垂直操作支架。此外还有一根 HDMI 电缆、一本快速入门指南和一根电源线。
维护
由于 Minisforum 也将 AtomMan X7 Ti 作为裸机系统销售,因此拆卸它以访问内存和固态硬盘是一个复杂的过程。一方面,用于拆卸底板的螺丝位于粘好的橡胶脚垫下,另一方面,盖板下还有其他几颗螺丝。风扇用 12 颗小螺丝固定到位。内存和大容量存储器的插槽只能在拆卸后才能进入。说到大容量存储:AtomMan X7 Ti 只能容纳固态硬盘。在大型散热器下可以安装一个 80 毫米和一个 30 毫米的固态硬盘。如果你还在寻找 Wi-Fi 模块,就必须进一步拆卸设备,因为前者位于主板的另一侧。拆卸一般是可行的,但我们不建议这样做。摄像头模块的连接线很短,屏幕的连接线也很短,这些都是组装过程中让人捏一把汗的地方。
触摸屏
Minisforum 是首家在基于英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 185H 的 AI 迷你 PC 中安装小型 4 英寸触摸显示屏的制造商。界面可自定义,可用于显示各种系统信息。如果你喜欢简单一点的,还可以显示时钟(有许多不同的设计)。系统性能可通过触摸屏快速调整,无需重新启动。制造商为此存储了三个性能配置文件,它们会影响 SoC 的功率限制。
性能 - 英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 处理器,16 核 22 线程
英特尔 英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 185H确保了持续的高速运行。iGPU 也随着 Meteor Lake 系列的推出而焕然一新。基于 Arc 架构,现在的 iGPU 性能明显高于之前系列中过时的 Xe iGPU。因此,Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 原则上可用于照片或视频编辑等对性能要求较高的应用。
测试条件
我们使用 "平衡 "功率曲线对该设备进行了所有性能测试。此外,所有相关测试都使用了 "性能 "配置文件。其他配置文件仅用于能量和噪音测量。 测试标准.
处理器
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 配备了 英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 185H.英特尔的最新型号提供 16 个内核和 22 个线程,这使得安装在这里的型号与 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H相同。在时钟频率方面存在差异,英特尔酷睿至尊 9 185H 的 P 核心频率最高可达 5.1 GHz,而英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H 的最高频率仅为 4.8 GHz。不过,在功耗限制方面,制造商对性能的影响是巨大的:英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 185H 的功耗为 65 瓦,明显高于竞争对手。在测试中,Acemagic F2A 的 SoC Acemagic F2A工作时的最大功率为 77 瓦,这意味着无论如何也达不到 90 瓦的目标功率。Minisforum 直接在一定程度上降低了功率,以提供稳定和持续的性能。
尽管有这一小小的限制,但足以让它在对比概述中领先于 Acemagic F2A。不过,采用 AMD Ryzen APU 的竞争对手也是无可奈何。只有在单项测试中,我们的测试样品才能取得领先。在 AIDA64 测试中,所有基于英特尔的设备都略逊于 AMD 设备。不过,Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 在英特尔设备中表现最佳。
如果你不依赖于英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 185H 的全部性能,你可以使用预定义的性能配置文件来改变性能。通过 4 英寸触摸屏有三种性能模式可供选择(见表)。不过,在日常使用中,您不会注意到性能上的明显差异。Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 即使在节能模式
下也能出色地应对日常使用。
有关进一步的比较和基准测试,请参阅我们的CPU 比较表 。
功率限制 1 | 功率限制 2 | |
---|---|---|
节能模式 | 45 W | 54 W |
平衡模式 | 54 W | 60 W |
性能模式 | 65 瓦 | 65 瓦 |
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
WinRAR - Result | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Average of class Mini PC | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (561 - 51004, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Average of class Mini PC (3604 - 214250, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Average of class Mini PC (225 - 9399, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (8172 - 184747, n=119, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (408 - 29064, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (1958 - 113499, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (3691 - 325960, n=119, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (74.8 - 2039, n=119, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (308 - 26952, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (4408 - 50500, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
性能模式下的 Cinebench 结果
平衡模式下的 Cinebench 结果
节能模式下的 Cinebench 结果
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 与 Cinebench R15 多环对比
Cinebench R15 连续循环并没有给 Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 带来大问题。在性能模式下,尽管 CPU 温度在负载情况下未达到 70 °C,但测试系统仍能轻松达到 65 瓦的最大功耗。与 Acemagic F2A 相比,我们的测试设备能提供稍好的结果。尽管如此,Minisforum 还是不得不提出这样一个问题:仅 65 瓦的功耗限制是否意味着浪费了部分性能?
系统性能
我们的测试样品在系统性能测试中表现相当出色。英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 185H 与已安装的 DDR5 内存配合使用,性能略高于竞争对手。不过,该系统芯片还可以与速度更快的内存(LPDDR5/x 7,467 MT/s)结合使用。
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (6481 - 89287, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (6914 - 99171, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (6862 - 98583, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
NPU 性能
在 英特尔酷睿至尊 9 185H中包含一个神经处理单元,作为 SoC 的独立部分,它可以特别高效地计算人工智能应用。我们使用 UL Procyon AI Interface 基准程序对其性能进行了更深入的研究。在这里,我们的测试样本无法超越竞争对手,尽管系统中使用了所谓更快的 CPU。测试重复了多次,结果几乎完全相同。
UL Procyon for Windows | |
Overall Score Integer NPU | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Overall Score Integer GPU | |
Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 | |
Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
DPC 延迟
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 的延迟并不理想。在 Edge 浏览器中上网时,我们已经看到了延迟的增加,而在播放 4K 测试视频时,延迟又略有增加。不过,这款迷你电脑在播放方面没有任何问题。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Acemagic AM18 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 使用的固态硬盘与 Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX.金士顿的这款产品使用 M.2-2280 接口,运行速度为 PCIe 4.0x4。这款固态硬盘在测试中表现出色,在日常使用中性能卓越。不过,该型号并非速度最快的产品之一,因此我们的测试设备只能排在中场位置。在散热方面,我们看到了一个出色的解决方案:固态硬盘上有一个大型散热器,同时覆盖了 M.2-2280 和 M.2-2230 插槽。这样就能在持续负载的情况下保持稳定的性能,这是所有竞争对手都无法做到的。Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 可配备两个固态硬盘。
有关进一步的比较和基准,请参阅我们的比较表 。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Average of class Mini PC | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Acemagic AM18 |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器 - Intel Arc 8 核
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 的 iGPU 现在基于英特尔 Arc 架构,性能明显高于配备 96 个 EU 的英特尔 Iris Xe G7。有了英特尔 Arc 8 核 iGPU,迷你电脑的竞争力大大增强,可以与 AMD Radeon 780M.英特尔 iGPU 在 Affinity Photo 2 中表现出色,我们已经在多台测试设备上观察到了这一点。
更多比较和基准测试结果请参阅GPU 比较表 。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 |
Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 9 185H | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX, AMD Radeon 780M R7 7840HS | Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 7 155H | Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900H | Geekom A7, AMD Radeon 780M R9 7940HS | Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900HK | Acemagic AM18, AMD Radeon 780M R7 7840HS | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECviewperf 12 | 463% | 3% | -18% | 475% | -16% | 487% | 282% | |
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05) | 49.7 | 85 71% | 49.8 0% | 40.1 -19% | 84.7 70% | 40.2 -19% | 83.7 68% | 75.4 ? 52% |
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) | 51.3 | 89.8 75% | 48.2 -6% | 37.1 -28% | 89 73% | 35.9 -30% | 88.5 73% | 64.2 ? 25% |
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) | 22.7 | 51.1 125% | 23.1 2% | 26.9 19% | 55.4 144% | 27.7 22% | 56.3 148% | 37 ? 63% |
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01) | 0.67 | 20.1 2900% | 0.91 36% | 0.4 -40% | 20.7 2990% | 0.4 -40% | 21.3 3079% | 13.3 ? 1885% |
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) | 58 | 73.4 27% | 54.9 -5% | 38.3 -34% | 69.7 20% | 39.8 -31% | 71.5 23% | 64 ? 10% |
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) | 15.9 | 61.7 288% | 16.9 6% | 11.8 -26% | 60.5 281% | 12.2 -23% | 60.5 281% | 28.5 ? 79% |
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) | 19.9 | 30.1 51% | 18.2 -9% | 16.6 -17% | 30.3 52% | 17.4 -13% | 30 51% | 35.3 ? 77% |
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) | 43 | 113 163% | 42.7 -1% | 45.3 5% | 116 170% | 47.3 10% | 116 170% | 72.4 ? 68% |
SPECviewperf 13 | 155% | 0% | -10% | 145% | -10% | 148% | 89% | |
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) | 48.5 | 86.1 78% | 46.4 -4% | 40.1 -17% | 83.9 73% | 39.9 -18% | 83.1 71% | 74.8 ? 54% |
Catia (catia-05) | 76.8 | 132 72% | 71.6 -7% | 51.3 -33% | 130 69% | 51.6 -33% | 129 68% | 91.4 ? 19% |
Creo (creo-02) | 29.3 | 93.6 219% | 29.6 1% | 41.1 40% | 93.4 219% | 40.2 37% | 92 214% | 73 ? 149% |
Energy (energy-02) | 5.27 | 25.8 390% | 5.69 8% | 4.5 -15% | 23.8 352% | 4.39 -17% | 24.1 357% | 17.7 ? 236% |
Maya (maya-05) | 62.5 | 108 73% | 59.5 -5% | 47.5 -24% | 107 71% | 48.3 -23% | 108 73% | 97.5 ? 56% |
Medical (medical-02) | 25 | 79.8 219% | 29.7 19% | 14.4 -42% | 77.6 210% | 14.4 -42% | 79 216% | 37.6 ? 50% |
Showcase (showcase-02) | 19.9 | 30 51% | 18.2 -9% | 17.3 -13% | 25.4 28% | 17.3 -13% | 29.9 50% | 35 ? 76% |
Solidworks (sw-04) | 45.6 | 107 135% | 44.8 -2% | 57.1 25% | 109 139% | 57.4 26% | 107 135% | 76.6 ? 68% |
SPECviewperf 2020 | 212% | -7% | -27% | 205% | -25% | 211% | 126% | |
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 4.23 | 12 184% | 5.05 19% | 3.49 -17% | 11.1 162% | 3.48 -18% | 13 207% | 7.74 ? 83% |
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 6.03 | 15.4 155% | 4.61 -24% | 3.05 -49% | 14.1 134% | 3 -50% | 14.2 135% | 10.8 ? 79% |
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 18.5 | 31.4 70% | 17.9 -3% | 14.8 -20% | 31.4 70% | 15.1 -18% | 31.2 69% | 29.7 ? 61% |
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 11.1 | 24.4 120% | 10 -10% | 7.78 -30% | 24.8 123% | 8.08 -27% | 24.7 123% | 18.3 ? 65% |
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 14.9 | 21 41% | 12.9 -13% | 9.69 -35% | 20.9 40% | 9.78 -34% | 20.7 39% | 21.8 ? 46% |
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 6.24 | 61.5 886% | 5.7 -9% | 6.29 1% | 61.4 884% | 6.67 7% | 61.1 879% | 37.5 ? 501% |
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 37.7 | 47.2 25% | 35.4 -6% | 23.9 -37% | 47 25% | 24.4 -35% | 46.7 24% | 56.4 ? 50% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 277% /
279% | -1% /
-1% | -18% /
-18% | 275% /
278% | -17% /
-17% | 282% /
285% | 166% /
167% |
3DMark 05 Standard | 45122 points | |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 38214 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 38739 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 12098 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 84971 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 31530 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7052 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 3556 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3580 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 的游戏性能不应被高估,因为这款小巧的计算设备并没有被宣传为游戏电脑。不过,有了英特尔 Arc 8 核 iGPU,你可以在屏幕上流畅地运行一些游戏。不过,全面绚丽的细节还是免了吧。 AMD 的 Radeon 780M在我们的测试样本中,其性能比 iGPU 稍高。这只能通过使用外置显卡来弥补,外置显卡可通过 USB4 或 OCuLink 连接。
要详细了解 iGPU 与其他显卡相比的性能,请参阅我们的 GPU 游戏列表.
The Witcher 3 | |
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Borderlands 3 | |
1280x720 Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Overall Quality (DX11) | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
GTA V | |
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 |
Far Cry 5 | |
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Far Cry New Dawn | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12) | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
F1 2021 | |
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
F1 22 | |
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
F1 23 | |
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset AA:T | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Metro Exodus | |
1280x720 Low Quality AF:4x | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Quality AF:16x | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Witcher 3 FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 163.6 | 156.7 | 41.2 | 16.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 140.2 | 85.1 | 46.8 | 24.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 106.5 | 80.6 | 79 | 74.6 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 69.1 | 36.8 | 26.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 64.9 | 49.7 | 40.5 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 79 | 45 | 42 | 39 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 124.9 | 67.8 | 57.2 | 46.7 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 79.3 | 38.3 | 35.8 | 30.5 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 69 | 41 | 39 | 36 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 63.1 | 37.6 | 27.1 | 21.7 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 93 | 41.9 | 28.7 | 21.9 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 139.1 | 76.9 | 60.5 | 41.2 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 161.1 | 83.5 | 65.3 | 29.6 |
God of War (2022) | 33.7 | 31.2 | 24 | 17.3 |
GRID Legends (2022) | 73 | 56.8 | 44.8 | 39.2 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 54.6 | 45 | 29.9 | 24.4 |
F1 22 (2022) | 84.9 | 77 | 55.9 | 14 |
F1 23 (2023) | 77 | 70.2 | 47.5 | 12.6 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 34.3 | 27.9 | 24 | 21.4 |
Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 93.1 | 70.6 | 53.6 | 47 |
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 152.6 | 111.5 | 108.6 | |
The First Descendant (2024) | 40.7 | 26.6 | 20.3 | 19 |
Once Human (2024) | 35.6 | 24.2 | 22.6 | 20.5 |
Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 20 | 16 | 12 | 7 |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 与 GPD G1 的性能测试
Minisforum 在 AtomMan X7 Ti 上安装了一个 OCuLink 接口和两个 USB4 端口,可与外置显卡配合使用。在测试中,我们将重点放在 OCuLink 连接上,因为它比 USB4 提供了更大的带宽,而这对于外置显卡来说是必不可少的。与 USB4 相比,OCuLink 的性能优势约为 10%。因此,只提供 USB4 的设备略显劣势。不过,当通过 USB4 连接 GPD G1 时,Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 的 3D 性能会稍差一些。
如果与配备 AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT 的 GPD G1 结合使用,3D 性能将大幅提升。现代游戏现在可以在 1440p 下流畅运行。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
Unigine Superposition | |
1280x720 720p Low | |
GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1920x1080 1080p High | |
GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
3840x2160 4k Optimized | |
GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
7680x4320 8k Optimized | |
GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
Extreme Preset DX11 | |
GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
ComputeMark v2.1 | |
1024x600 Normal, Score | |
GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 178 | 173.8 | 165.1 | 95.1 | 69.5 | 74.9 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 419 | 333 | 193.7 | 111.6 | 77.1 | 54.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 174.6 | 154.9 | 158.8 | 140.9 | 99.6 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 207 | 133.1 | 95.6 | 69.4 | 37.3 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 113.9 | 94.3 | 75.1 | 56.3 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 142 | 125 | 120 | 110 | 98 | 49 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 449 | 260 | 216 | 185.6 | 121.1 | 65.1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 157.1 | 103.9 | 103.3 | 93.3 | 69.3 | 39.6 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 116 | 103 | 99 | 88 | 85 | 56 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 172.2 | 128 | 97.1 | 76.7 | 59.4 | 34.7 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 120.5 | 97.8 | 87.5 | 78 | 58.8 | 31.4 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 347 | 262 | 214 | 146.1 | 109.9 | 63.2 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 368 | 331 | 262 | 111.3 | 74.2 | 15.6 |
God of War (2022) | 136.6 | 122.3 | 96.9 | 67.9 | 54.7 | 34.4 |
GRID Legends (2022) | 159.4 | 140.5 | 127.3 | 109.2 | 93.3 | 56.7 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 224 | 178 | 110.7 | 88.4 | 59.3 | 21.3 |
F1 22 (2022) | 256 | 250 | 211 | 54 | 31.4 | |
F1 23 (2023) | 256 | 245 | 198.2 | 32.7 | 10.7 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 135 | 106.9 | 90.3 | 80.1 | 49.2 | 20.3 |
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 132 | 118 | 101 | 74 | 54 | 27 |
Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 284.7 | 208 | 128 | 102.8 | 72.3 | 35.4 |
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 56 | 50 | 35 | 29 | 19 | |
Skull & Bones (2024) | 130 | 111 | 85 | 67 | 49 | 24 |
排放 - Minisforum 做出了很好的妥协
噪音排放
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 的噪音排放在空闲模式下非常不明显。但在负载情况下,情况就发生了变化,我们记录到的最大噪音值为 43.5 dB(A)。诚然,在风扇噪音方面,我们经常被 Minisforum 惯坏,从 Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX 就可以看出这一点。不过,我们可以接受噪音水平,因为我们离恼人的噪音源还很远。
,我们还查看了使用其他两个性能配置文件时的最大音量。如果在节能模式
下运行 Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti,可以将最大噪音水平降低到 36 dB(A),尽管我们在平衡模式
下的记录略低于 39 dB(A)。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 29.8 / 29.9 / 30 dB(A) |
Load |
| 37.3 / 43.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.1 dB(A) |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 7% | -2% | -2% | -9% | -4% | -5% | |
off / environment * | 24.1 | 24.8 -3% | 24.9 -3% | 25.4 -5% | 25.4 -5% | 25.4 -5% | 24.8 -3% |
Idle Minimum * | 29.8 | 28.5 4% | 25.4 15% | 28 6% | 33.3 -12% | 27.5 8% | 31 -4% |
Idle Average * | 29.9 | 28.5 5% | 25.7 14% | 28.1 6% | 33.6 -12% | 28 6% | 31.2 -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 30 | 28.7 4% | 25.7 14% | 28.5 5% | 33.7 -12% | 33 -10% | 31.4 -5% |
Load Average * | 37.3 | 32.4 13% | 47.8 -28% | 39.6 -6% | 43.3 -16% | 42.8 -15% | 37.1 1% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.2 | 32.7 19% | 45.23 -13% | 47.2 -17% | 43.2 -7% | 44.5 -11% | 37.6 6% |
Load Maximum * | 43.5 | 39.6 9% | 49 -13% | 44.2 -2% | 43.3 -0% | 44.9 -3% | 53.7 -23% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 从未出现过任何温度问题。机箱本身始终保持低温,只有风扇出风口区域的温度值略有上升,这仅与气流有关。在压力测试中,我们看到 英特尔酷睿至尊 9 185H最高温度为 92 °C。不过,处理器的平均温度稳定在 86 °C。值得注意的是,SoC 始终在规定的功率限制(65 瓦)下运行。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.2 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.2 °C / 90 F.
耗电量
总体而言,如果不考虑空闲模式下的结果,Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 是经济实惠的。在平均负载情况下,我们记录的功耗为 53.1 瓦,该设备的峰值约为 100 瓦。由于采用了 4 英寸触摸显示屏,闲置模式下的能耗要求略高于某些竞争对手。不过,我们的测试设备在这方面并不完全出乎意料。120 瓦的紧凑型电源装置已在 Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX.
根据制造商的说法,电源装置是 Minisforum 只允许英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 185H 最大功率为 65 瓦的原因。就效率而言,这一步当然是可以理解的。
Off / Standby | 1.8 / 2.5 Watt |
Idle | 8.2 / 12.1 / 14 Watt |
Load |
53.1 / 100.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -1% | -2% | 9% | 28% | -24% | -14% | 18% | -4% | |
Idle Minimum * | 8.2 | 8.5 -4% | 9.1 -11% | 5.7 30% | 3.8 54% | 12.1 -48% | 9.8 -20% | 5.41 ? 34% | 9.48 ? -16% |
Idle Average * | 12.1 | 10.5 13% | 10.3 15% | 9.5 21% | 4.8 60% | 13.2 -9% | 11.5 5% | 8.64 ? 29% | 11.5 ? 5% |
Idle Maximum * | 14 | 12.9 8% | 14.4 -3% | 16.5 -18% | 6.5 54% | 14.1 -1% | 15.3 -9% | 12.1 ? 14% | 14.9 ? -6% |
Load Average * | 53.1 | 67.2 -27% | 54.9 -3% | 53.3 -0% | 71.9 -35% | 82.9 -56% | 75.3 -42% | 54.2 ? -2% | 57.4 ? -8% |
Load Maximum * | 100.4 | 97.2 3% | 110.4 -10% | 87.8 13% | 94.7 6% | 106.8 -6% | 102.8 -2% | 85 ? 15% | 97.5 ? 3% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption with the external monitor
Power consumption with the external monitor
Pros
Cons
结论 - Core Ultra 9 185H 是一款功能强大的全能型产品
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 是中国系统制造商推出的首款基于英特尔流星湖处理器的高端机型。配备了 英特尔酷睿Ultra 9 185Hб 的迷你 PC 性能出众。不过,制造商将处理器的功耗限制在 65 瓦。就噪音和效率而言,此举是可以理解的,尽管在温度方面仍有一定的改进空间。
Minisforum 采用了新的设计方法,在设备上安装了 4 英寸触摸显示屏。这样做的目的当然值得商榷,因为在日常生活中你可能不会经常玩弄它。能够在三种性能配置文件之间快速轻松地切换可能是最好的选择。我们希望能有一个自己定义处理器性能极限的替代方案。此外,小屏幕上还能显示一些与系统相关的数据。重视这些小细节的人一定会喜欢这款设备。Minisforum 的 AtomMan X7 Ti 再次展示了出色的制造质量。遗憾的是,该设备在维护方面表现不佳。许多螺丝再次被隐藏在胶粘的橡胶脚垫下,不便于用户使用。
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 明显有别于大多数微型电脑。其性能良好,接口选择丰富,是一个很好的卖点。
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 的性能值得期待。在测试中,我们可以确认,在 32 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘的配合下,它具有良好的工作效率。不过,Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 并没有成为无可争议的顶级机型。相比之下,基于 AMD Ryzen APU 的竞争产品不相上下。因此,购买决策的决定性因素可能是连接性。在这一点上,Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 以其广泛的接口而胜出。遗憾的是,USB4 仍不是标准配置,而且并不总是提供,这一点可以从 Acemagic F2A 的例子中看出。Minisforum 甚至安装了两个 USB4 接口,迷你 PC 还有一个 OCuLink 端口。这意味着该设备可以作为各种不同应用的基础。
价格和供应情况
在欧盟,可直接从制造商的商店订购 Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti。.在评测时,您至少需要支付759 欧元(约合 822 美元)购买裸机。(约合 822 美元),但我们的测试设备配有 32 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD,售价为959 欧元(约合 1,039 美元)。(~$1,039).使用代码X7Ti20
,还可再节省 20 欧元(约合 22 美元)。
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
- 05/15/2024 v7 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.