Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

Minisforum EliteMini AI370 评测:采用 AMD Zen 5 Strix Point APU 的迷你 PC 树立了新标准

AMD Ryzen 9 AI 实现了这一目标!

Minisforum EliteMini AI370 在小巧的机箱内实现了高端性能,主要面向在狭小空间内需要高计算能力的用户。然而,这是有代价的。在测试中,我们研究了 AI370 能否满足这些要求,以及它的优缺点。
Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Mini PC Desktop Business AMD Zen 5

结论 - 速度快,但只有在手动优化的情况下才真正有效

Minisforum EliteMini AI370 展示了如何在小巧的机身中装入强劲的动力。AMD Ryzen AI 9 370HX 始终如一地提供高性能,而功耗却没有明显增加。相反,Minisforum EliteMini AI370 是我们迄今为止测试过的最高效的设备之一。Minisforum EliteMini AI370 配备了 32 GB 内存,但遗憾的是不能升级,也不提供 64 GB 版本。Minisforum EliteMini AI370 的外壳小巧坚固,是节省空间的理想选择。其简洁的外观确保了其专业性,可在办公室或创意环境中给人留下良好印象。唯一值得批评的是材料的选择,因为就迷你 PC 的价格而言,金属外壳确实应该是标准配置。

它的连接选择不错,但并不突出。USB4 是 Minisforum EliteMini AI370 上最先进的连接方式,但只能使用一次。在功耗方面,它的散热可以很好地满足预定义的限制。不过,在负载情况下,迷你电脑的声音有时会比其他设备大。这可以通过调整 BIOS 中的风扇配置文件来解决。如果您已经拥有一台 Minisforum EliteMini AI370,我们建议您进行手动调整,以确保大幅降低负载时的声压级。Minisforum EliteMini AI370 属于高价位产品,鉴于其紧凑的设计和强大的硬件,这无疑是合理的。与该性能级别的其他迷你电脑相比,我们的测试样品也毫不逊色。不过,其 1399 美元的最高售价肯定会让很多人暂时望而却步。

Pros

+ 稳定的箱子
+ 轻便
+ 强大的 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
+ 性能较 Zen4 有明显提升
+ 不错的 iGPU 性能
+ 32 GB 内存(7,500 MT/s)
+ Vesa 安装选项
+ 1x USB4
+ 双 2.5G LAN
+ 主动式固态硬盘冷却
+ 节俭高效

Cons

- 材料选择(外壳)
- 内存焊接在一起,无法升级
- 实时音频和视频编辑可能出现问题(DPC 延迟)
- 有性能问题的固态硬盘
- 价格昂贵

价格和供应情况

目前,您可以直接从制造商处购买 Minisforum EliteMini AI370,价格为 1,099 美元。.

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Geizhals
Weight
Height
Display
1.
77.2%
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘
AMD Radeon 890M ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Listenpreis 1499 EUR472 g46.9 mmx
2.
80.8%
Aoostar GEM12
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘
AMD Radeon 780M ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Listenpreis 649 US-Dollar653 g60 mmx
3.
78.8%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD
Listenpreis 1149 EUR
Geizhals Suche
693 g46.9 mmx
4.
78.4%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS ⎘
AMD Radeon 780M ⎘
32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD
Listenpreis 999 EUR548 g37 mmx
5.
75.3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Bestpreis 1278.98€ BA-Computer
2. 1279€ Media Markt.at
3. 1281.06€ galaxus.at
622 g41 mmx
6.
73.6%
Khadas Mind 2
Khadas Mind 2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Listenpreis 1.099 USD
Geizhals Suche
437 g20 mmx

迷你 PC 市场持续走俏,尤其是在追求小巧却拥有强大硬件的用户中。全新的 Minisforum EliteMini AI370 将这一级别的设备提升到了一个新的水平,由于采用了最先进的处理器架构,其性能明显提高。Minisforum EliteMini AI370 的强大性能不仅适用于传统的办公和多媒体应用,也适用于创意专业人士、开发人员和偶尔的游戏玩家。在本次评测中,我们将了解这款迷你电脑是否能实现这一目标。其基础包括 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370的基础上,它承诺了很多,而且由于其 AMD Radeon 890M现在,它的 iGPU 性能得到了进一步提升。

Minisforum EliteMini AI370 的售价为 1399 美元,绝不便宜,但在此配置中,它配备了 32 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD。同类设备如 华硕 NUC 14 Pro+Geekom GT1 Mega上市时的价格也差不多。目前,Minisforum EliteMini AI370 只有一种配置。

规格

Minisforum EliteMini AI370
Processor
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 12 x 2 - 5.1 GHz, 54 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Strix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon 890M, Adrenalin 24.10.1
Memory
32 GB 
, LPDDR5x 7,500 MT/s, quad-channel, soldered on
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, 1024 GB 
, 887 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5mm Combo-Audio
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW) (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz)
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 46.9 x 130 x 127
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Additional features
24 Months Warranty
Weight
472 g, Power Supply: 273 g
Price
1499 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - 无金属

Minisforum EliteMini AI370 的外壳采用光滑的银色表面处理。但值得一提的是,这只是一个简单的塑料外壳。Minisforum 过去曾使用过更好的外壳,其高质量的金属表面引人注目。现在,许多竞争对手在这方面也纷纷效仿,我们在这次评测中选择的对比设备也是如此。在手感方面,Minisforum EliteMini AI370 无法与竞争对手相提并论。这有点遗憾,因为考虑到其购买价格,我们对它的期望值要高得多。不过,它的外壳看起来非常坚固,而且由于采用了磨砂表面,因此相对耐刮。一个积极的副作用是,这款电脑的重量相对较轻,仅为 472 克。其外部电源装置的重量为 273 克,与该性能级别的大多数微型电脑差不多。在空间要求方面,Minisforum EliteMini AI370 也与大多数其他设备一致。

尺寸比较

130 mm 130 mm 60 mm 653 g144 mm 112 mm 41 mm 622 g135 mm 132 mm 46.9 mm 693 g130 mm 127 mm 46.9 mm 472 g146 mm 105 mm 20 mm 437 g117 mm 112 mm 37 mm 548 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

连通性 - 低于预期

Minisforum EliteMini AI370 迷你电脑具有各种外部连接,对于大多数用户来说应该足够了。就数量而言,我们的测试设备不如某些竞争对手提供得多。例如 Geekom GT1 Mega.Minisforum EliteMini AI370 的正面和背面共安装了四个 USB Type-A 接口。正面还有一个 USB4 接口和一个插孔。除了 USB4 连接(也可输出屏幕信号)外,您还可以通过 HDMI 或 DisplayPort 连接显示器。因此,Minisforum EliteMini AI370 可同时控制三个屏幕。此外,还有两个 2.5G 网络连接,这在迷你 PC 上并不常见。

正面清除 CMOS、电源按钮、音频插孔、USB 4、2 个 USB 3.2 Gen 2
正面清除 CMOS、电源按钮、音频插孔、USB 4、2 个 USB 3.2 Gen 2
背面:2 个 USB 3.2 Gen2m HDMI 2.1、DisplayPort 2.0、2 个 2.5G LAN、DC-In
背面:2 个 USB 3.2 Gen2m HDMI 2.1、DisplayPort 2.0、2 个 2.5G LAN、DC-In

我们使用了 威刚 SE920外置固态硬盘来检测 USB4 连接的性能,它在测试中取得了优异的成绩。即便如此,它仍不足以获得第一名。我们的测试固态硬盘与 华硕 NUC 14Pro+以及 卡达斯 Mind 2的性能略胜一筹。

使用威刚 SE920 检查 USB4 性能
使用威刚 SE920 检查 USB4 性能
ADATA SE920 采用 PCIe 4.0 x4 接口
ADATA SE920 采用 PCIe 4.0 x4 接口
Connectivity - USB 3.x / USB4 / TB - AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3209.77 MB/s
Khadas Mind 2
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
3165.4 MB/s
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3067.24 MB/s
Average of class Mini PC
  (1611 - 3906, n=13, last 2 years)
2926 MB/s
Geekom GT1 Mega
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
1611.37 MB/s

交流

无线局域网模块
无线局域网模块

Minisforum 在 EliteMini AI370 中安装了 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x,它可以处理 5 GHz 和较新的 6 GHz 频段。不过,我们的测试显示,这两个频段之间没有明显差异。除了 Aoostar GEM12之外,我们的测试样品表现明显较差。不过,它的传输速率足以满足日常使用。此外,您还可以使用有线网络连接。Minisforum EliteMini AI370 背面有两个 2.5G 网络接口。华硕 ROG Capture GT AXE11000 路由器用于我们所有的无线局域网测试。

Networking
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1189 (min: 898) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
899 (min: 856) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
883 (min: 853) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
703 (min: 661) MBit/s ∼73%
Aoostar GEM12
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
iperf3 receive AXE11000
740 (min: 676) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
736 (min: 369) MBit/s ∼76%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1149 (min: 666) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1242 (min: 1110) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
888 (min: 825) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
741 (min: 690) MBit/s ∼77%
Geekom AX8 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1657 (min: 1619) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1800 (min: 1737) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
979 (min: 962) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
966 (min: 921) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1446 (min: 1321) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1223 (min: 1160) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
951 (min: 926) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
707 (min: 666) MBit/s ∼73%
Khadas Mind 2
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1485 (min: 1453) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1542 (min: 1432) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
941 (min: 920) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
740 (min: 493) MBit/s ∼77%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300Tooltip
Minisforum EliteMini AI370; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø899 (856-946)
Minisforum EliteMini AI370; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1188 (898-1307)
Minisforum EliteMini AI370; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø883 (853-899)
Minisforum EliteMini AI370; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø703 (661-737)

配件

Minisforum EliteMini AI370 的供货范围包括设备本身以及一个 120 瓦的电源装置和一个带安装材料的小型 VESA 支架。不包括键盘或鼠标等其他配件。

维护

Minisforum EliteMini AI370 目前只有我们测试的配置。相反,这意味着该设备不一定要打开。不过,如果要更换或清洁部件,还是可以打开的。底部有四颗螺丝用于固定机箱盖。取下这些螺丝后,就可以轻松取下顶盖。不过,只有大容量存储器和 WLAN 模块可以更换,或者更准确地说,可以扩展。内存是焊接到位的,无法通过额外的模块进行扩展。微型电脑本身有两个风扇,如果需要清洁,可以使用它们。要拆卸 CPU 风扇,必须将电路板从机箱中取出,但只要稍加技巧和小心,这并非不可能完成的任务。

顶面打开的 Minisforum EliteMini AI370
顶面打开的 Minisforum EliteMini AI370
箱盖
空箱
带冷却装置的电路板(底部)
带冷却装置的电路板(顶部)
固态硬盘冷却装置
固态硬盘冷却装置

可持续性

该设备的包装主要由纸张和纸板组成,仅比迷你电脑和配件本身稍大一些。制造商没有宣传任何特别的可持续发展措施。

性能 - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 性能明显提升

产品 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370是 Minisforum EliteMini AI370 中唯一的 CPU 选项。它还配备了 32 GB LPDDR5x 内存,速度为 7,500 MT/s,可以满足最广泛的应用需求。AMD 还修改了 iGPU,采用了新的 Zen5 APU,其名称为 AMD Radeon 890M.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO

测试条件

我们使用 "平衡 "性能配置文件进行了所有性能测试。AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 的配置文件可在 BIOS 中调整。我们在默认的平衡设置下进行了所有测试。在不影响电脑整体评估的前提下,我们使用其他性能配置文件进行了一些比较基准测试,以说明性能差异。相关信息请参见各测试部分。

处理器

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 是目前市场上速度最快的移动处理器之一,在 Minisforum EliteMini AI370 中表现出色。与 AMD Ryzen 9 8945H 相比,它的单核心和多核心性能都得到了提升。现在,AMD 拥有 12 个内核,长期以来一直在增加物理计算单元的数量,从而为更好的多核性能提供了可能。可用功耗和安装的散热装置对处理器的性能都有很大影响。出厂默认设置提供了一个不错的平均值,只有在 BIOS 中激活性能模式后才能略有改善。即使是静音模式,在连续负载情况下也能将 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 的功耗降低到 35 瓦,性能也非常出色。

有关进一步的比较和基准测试,请参阅我们的 CPU 对比表.

功率模式 PL1/PL2 单位:瓦 Cinebench R15 1T Cinebench R15 nT Cinebench R20 1T Cinebench R20 nT Cinebench R23 1T Cinebench R23 nT
安静型 35/45 307 2,867 790 7,476 2,009 18,996
平衡型 45/54 307 3,143 786 8,208 2,010 20,962
绩效 54/60 307 3,141 791 8,416 2,021 21,418
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R23
Cinebench R23
Cinebench 2024
Cinebench 2024
Performance Rating - Percent
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
59 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
55.6 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
55.5 pt
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
55.4 pt
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
55 pt
Khadas Mind 2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
49.8 pt

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
8668
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
17005 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
96857 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
15698 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
16665
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
53766
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
3.29 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
33.97 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
3.68 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
38.84 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
307 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
3143 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.9 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
281.4 fps
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
786 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
8208 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
20962 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2010 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
115 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1135 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
93.4 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M
84.1 pt
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
81.3 pt
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
68.1 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
65.2 pt
Khadas Mind 2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
57.3 pt
Average of class Mini PC
 
55.2 pt

Cinebench R15 多连续测试

只有在第一次使用 Cinebench R15 连续循环进行的较长时间压力测试中,Minisforum EliteMini AI370 才显示出它能够保持 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370在控制之下。即使在持续负载的情况下,APU 也几乎没有显示出任何弱点。除了一个小例外,50 次运行均顺利完成,我们的测试样品以明显优势获得第一名。

Cinebench R15 循环期间的 CPU 指标
Cinebench R15 循环期间的 CPU 指标
01603204806408009601120128014401600176019202080224024002560272028803040Tooltip
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø3064 (2889.55-3155.82)
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2530 (2503.13-2552.81)
Geekom GT1 Mega Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2442 (2286.63-2795.05)
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS: Ø2223 (2100.4-2438.43)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2588 (2519.69-2910.57)
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2025 (1790.91-2333.04)

系统性能

遗憾的是,处理器的出色性能并未在系统基准测试中得到充分体现。Minisforum EliteMini AI370 的主要性能优势来自其快速的内存。

PCMark 10 / Score
Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N7000 2 TB
7553 Points +5%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
7431 Points +4%
Geekom GT1 Mega, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
7232 Points +1%
Minisforum EliteMini AI370, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
AMD Radeon 890M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
7173 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro+, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
7103 Points -1%
Khadas Mind 2, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
6698 Points -7%
CrossMark / Overall
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1939 Points +8%
Geekom GT1 Mega, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
1888 Points +6%
Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N7000 2 TB
1865 Points +4%
Minisforum EliteMini AI370, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
AMD Radeon 890M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1789 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro+, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1713 Points -4%
Khadas Mind 2, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
1527 Points -15%
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
88377 MB/s
Khadas Mind 2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75135 MB/s -15%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
73624 MB/s -17%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
69929 MB/s -21%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M
68924 MB/s -22%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
67777 MB/s -23%
Average of class Mini PC
  (8377 - 89287, n=113, last 2 years)
50715 MB/s -43%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

迷你 PC 的 DPC 延迟结果并不理想。不过,我们在使用 Edge 浏览器上网时仍然没有发现任何问题。只有播放 4K 测试视频时,延迟才会大幅增加。我们还记录了几次掉帧。

打开多个浏览器标签页时的最大延迟
打开多个浏览器标签页时的最大延迟
播放 4K 视频时的最大延迟
播放 4K 视频时的最大延迟
Prime95 十秒后的最大延迟时间
Prime95 十秒后的最大延迟时间
按最长执行时间排列的驱动程序
按最长执行时间排列的驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
4323 μs *
Khadas Mind 2
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
2793 μs * +35%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N7000 2 TB
1856 μs * +57%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1831 μs * +58%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
1145.7 μs * +73%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1001.9 μs * +77%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

1-TB SSD - Crucial P3 Plus
1-TB SSD - Crucial P3 Plus

我们测试的 Minisforum EliteMini AI370 配备了 1 TB 存储空间的 Crucial P3 Plus。从技术上讲,它是 PCI Express 4.0 SSD,以全带宽运行。我们的测试表明,这种存储介质并不是最快的。不过,它足以满足简单的日常办公使用。Minisforum 安装了一个主动冷却装置来冷却固态硬盘。在压力测试中,我们没有发现任何温度问题。不过,重要的是要知道,Crucial P3 Plus 是一款采用 QLC NAND 内存的固态硬盘,没有 DRAM 缓存。实际上,这导致写入时的传输速度非常慢。如果你经常需要向固态硬盘写入大量数据,就应该选择功能更强大的型号。我们使用金士顿 KC3000 固态硬盘进行了测试,结果显示效果明显更好。Minisforum EliteMini AI370 可容纳两个 M.2-2280 SSD。

有关进一步的比较和基准测试,请参阅我们的 比较表.

AS 固态硬盘
AS 固态硬盘
CDM 3
CDM 3
CDM 5
CDM 5
CDM 6
CDM 6
CDI
CDI
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
Sequential Read: 2810 MB/s
Sequential Write: 3655 MB/s
512K Read: 2055 MB/s
512K Write: 1487 MB/s
4K Read: 44.51 MB/s
4K Write: 178.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 631.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 327.9 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
88 pt
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
82.5 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
63.2 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
62.6 pt
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
59.3 pt
Khadas Mind 2
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
56.7 pt
Average of class Mini PC
 
46.5 pt

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5169 (4392.93-5190.14)
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5121 (4152.57-5218.34)
Geekom GT1 Mega Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8 ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5055 (4738.1-5067.7)
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000 2 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6996 (5972.7-7027.76)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6962 (5660.63-7000.13)
Khadas Mind 2 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5242 (4441.06-5270.98)

图形卡

Minisforum EliteMini AI370 的 iGPU 称为 AMD Radeon 890M基于 RDNA3+ 架构,取代了 AMD Radeon 780M.更新的 iGPU 拥有更多的计算单元和更高的时钟频率,从而提高了性能。我们将其与配备 AMD Radeon 780M 的其他微型电脑进行了比较,发现性能提高了 20% 或更多。AMD Radeon 890M 也能与英特尔的 Arc 8 核 iGPU 相抗衡。不过,在与 Nvidia RTX 40 的性能对比中,iGPU 明显落于下风。 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑.

更多比较和基准测试请参见我们的 GPU 对比表.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
 
100 pt
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
49.3 pt
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
45 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
43.7 pt
Khadas Mind 2
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
41.1 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
40.7 pt
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
40.6 pt
Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (104.3 - 118.1, n=2)
111.2 fps +152%
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
44.2 fps
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
36.4 fps -18%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
35.3 fps -20%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
34.6 fps -22%
Khadas Mind 2
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
33.8 fps -24%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
30 fps -32%
Extreme Preset DX11
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (101.9 - 114.6, n=2)
108.3 fps +140%
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
45.2 fps
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
37.5 fps -17%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
36.4 fps -19%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
36.3 fps -20%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
36.3 fps -20%
Khadas Mind 2
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
35.8 fps -21%
Minisforum EliteMini AI370, AMD Radeon 890M
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Radeon 780M
R7 8845HS
Geekom GT1 Mega, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Ultra 9 185H
Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Radeon 780M
R9 8945HS
Asus NUC 14 Pro+, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Ultra 9 185H
Khadas Mind 2, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Ultra 7 155H
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Mini PC
 
SPECviewperf 2020
-23%
-54%
-23%
-56%
-58%
33%
-30%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)
17.5
11.2
-36%
7.07
-60%
12.8
-27%
6.99
-60%
5.71
-67%
9.28 ?(9.2 - 9.36, n=2)
-47%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)
28.3
19.9
-30%
5
-82%
13.3
-53%
4.94
-83%
4.25
-85%
16.4 ?(15.5 - 17.2, n=2)
-42%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)
37.6
33.4
-11%
19.8
-47%
35.3
-6%
18.9
-50%
18.1
-52%
64.5 ?(59 - 70, n=2)
72%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)
27.3
23.2
-15%
11.7
-57%
25.1
-8%
11.2
-59%
11.3
-59%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
26.8
20.4
-24%
15.5
-42%
21.1
-21%
14.8
-45%
13.9
-48%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)
62.9
47.7
-24%
38.8
-38%
49.6
-21%
37.2
-41%
41
-35%
146.2 ?(138 - 154.4, n=2)
132%
3DMark 05 Standard
58138 points
3DMark 06 Standard Score
45168 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
39557 points
3DMark 11 Performance
15337 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
174529 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
40338 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
8901 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
4822 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3924 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
583 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
3211 points
Help

游戏性能

这款迷你 PC 的游戏性能得益于强大的 AMD Radeon 890M.不过,在图形细节方面,您仍然需要忍受一些妥协。尽管如此,iGPU 仍能提供强大的性能,足以流畅地运行大量中等细节的游戏。只有将 Minisforum EliteMini AI370 与外置显卡结合使用,才能获得更高的 3D 性能。

要详细了解 iGPU 与其他显卡相比的性能,请查看我们的 GPU 游戏列表.

GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N7000 2 TB
169.4 (3.69min, 125P1) fps +7%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
165.2 (3.77min, 100P1) fps +4%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
165.1 (4.83min, 125P1) fps +4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
162.9 (3.78min, 111.1P1) fps +3%
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
158.6 (4.43min, 71.4P1) fps
Khadas Mind 2
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
145.4 (4.75min, 83.3P1) fps -8%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
79.5 (10.2min, 50P1) fps
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N7000 2 TB
65.9 (2.44min, 41.7P1) fps -17%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
65.3 (4.57min, 45.5P1) fps -18%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
43.5 (3.49min, 32.3P1) fps -45%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
40.6 (3.3min, 30.3P1) fps -49%
Khadas Mind 2
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
35.9 (2.99min, 27P1) fps -55%

FPS diagram - 30 mins Cyberpunk 2077 1920 x 1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)

0510152025Tooltip
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M: Ø27 (25.5-27.4)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M: Ø21.7 (20.1-23.3)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core: Ø22.1 (18.6-24)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M: Ø19.2 (17.9-20.3)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core: Ø20.3 (18.2-21.9)
Khadas Mind 2 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core: Ø9.58 (6.59-11)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 158.6 151.3 79.5 33.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 132.3 125.7 99.2 87.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 93.7 48.4 34.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 91.1 69.9 53.3
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 48.5 37.7 30.9 30.7
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 52.5 40.9 32.3 28.4
F1 24 (2024) 104.6 91.9 66
The First Descendant (2024) 67.5 42.7 33.7 28.8
Once Human (2024) 64.2 40.6 34.1 30.6
Black Myth: Wukong (2024) 31 24 18
Star Wars Outlaws (2024) 16 14.7 12.5
Space Marine 2 (2024) 34 28.7 26.9 22.6
Final Fantasy XVI (2024) 22.7 22.7 18.8
God of War Ragnarök (2024) 41.1 34.3 30.6 24.9
Until Dawn (2024) 50.3 32.5 22.1 16.4
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) 69 62 43 37
Stalker 2 (2024) 25.4 21.8 18.6
Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) 29.2 22.8
Civilization 7 (2025) 116 66.3 35.9

使用 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 检查 Minisforum EliteMini AI370 性能

GPU-Z
GPU-Z

使用外置显卡可以明显提高 3D 性能。Minisforum EliteMini AI370 可通过 USB4 实现这一功能。结合我们的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090,我们测试了使用目前最快的消费级显卡所能达到的性能。

简短的性能对比显示,3D 性能大幅提升。不过,使用 USB4 接口时,与其他迷你 PC 相比并无差异。由于 USB4 连接的带宽限制,NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 根本无法提供更多可用性能。使用 OCuLink 连接时,性能会明显提高,但遗憾的是,Minisforum EliteMini AI370 不提供此选项。

Performance Rating - Percent
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
100 pt
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
89.4 pt
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
79.6 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
78.2 pt
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) -1!
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
77.3 pt
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
75.9 pt
Performance Rating - Percent
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
100 pt
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
75.5 pt
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
42 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
38.2 pt
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
36.9 pt
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
33.7 pt
Minisforum EliteMini AI370, AMD Radeon 890M
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) ,
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) ,
Ultra 9 185H
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) ,
Ultra 7 155H
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) ,
Ultra 9 185H
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) ,
Ryzen 7 8700G
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
Ryzen 5 9600X
Average of class Mini PC
 
SPECviewperf 2020
286%
286%
284%
281%
395%
424%
-30%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)
17.5
41.6
138%
42
140%
42.3
142%
42.1
141%
43.2
147%
43.5
149%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)
28.3
136
381%
93
229%
95.3
237%
92.8
228%
141
398%
95.6
238%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)
37.6
90.5
141%
94.6
152%
83.8
123%
91.1
142%
128
240%
143
280%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)
27.3
79.8
192%
77.4
184%
75.7
177%
77.3
183%
85.2
212%
94.2
245%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
26.8
135
404%
161
501%
160
497%
158
490%
204
661%
231
762%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)
62.9
351
458%
384
510%
393
525%
378
501%
512
714%
609
868%
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 182.5 163.8 153.3 148.8 130.1 94.4
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 51.8 51.4 45.9 43.9 43.1 41.6
F1 24 (2024) 84.3 79.4 66.5 24.5 24.5 24.2

排放 - 风扇曲线需要改进

噪音排放

Minisforum EliteMini AI370 的散热装置由两个主动风扇组成,其中一个还作为主动组件为固态硬盘散热。小型热导管结构位于设备底部,可接入两个风扇中较大的一个,为 SoC 降温。空转时,迷你电脑非常安静,几乎听不到声音。但在负载情况下,噪音会迅速改变,即使在平均负载情况下,我们也能听到 47 分贝(A)的噪音。不过,在最大负载情况下,噪音也不会明显增大。BIOS 中有预定义的风扇配置文件,可略微调整风扇转速。此时,我们建议使用 "静音 "模式。即使在负载情况下,它也能保持非常安静,几乎听不到声音。

Noise Level

Idle
25 / 25.1 / 29.1 dB(A)
Load
47 / 47.1 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.8 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.743.640.339.338.140.340.72544.341.544.742.340.742.144.33143.741.138.740.640.240.743.74027.648.129.729.327.430.727.65032.232.226.528.626.525.432.26323.223.622.22623.123.723.28019.820.916.124.316.218.519.810025.725.123.823.723.522.625.71252222.219.916.61414.82216022.523.214.813.515.914.822.520026.227.415.311.810.711.426.225026.82614.910.610.811.126.831526.425.613.2109.89.426.440026.62614.48.48.39.226.650027.727.315.38.88.88.727.763029.929.715.299.28.829.980036.334.618.89.59.49.436.3100036.936.820.19.910.19.536.9125034.634.616.910.910.910.834.6160036.636.316.811.311.310.736.6200037.938.21911.911.711.737.9250034.634.615.512.212.212.534.6315036.536.314.913.113.21336.540003838.117.513.913.813.738500035.135.41714.514.214.135.1630030.530.715.214.914.614.830.5800025.425.716.515.315.414.825.41000021.822.917.215.615.41521.81250017.82015.716.816.114.917.81600016.821.417.417.117.114.816.8SPL47.14729.125.12524.847.1N5.45.41.10.60.60.65.4median 27.7median 27.4median 16.5median 12.2median 12.2median 12.5median 27.7Delta6.55.81.82.62.41.96.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMinisforum EliteMini AI370
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
Aoostar GEM12
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
Geekom GT1 Mega
Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
Geekom AX8 Pro
R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
Khadas Mind 2
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
Noise
7%
-5%
-2%
-3%
-2%
off / environment *
24.8
24.3
2%
24.8
-0%
24.9
-0%
24.6
1%
24.8
-0%
Idle Minimum *
25
27.5
-10%
25.4
-2%
24.9
-0%
24.7
1%
26.1
-4%
Idle Average *
25.1
27.6
-10%
27.2
-8%
24.9
1%
29.6
-18%
27
-8%
Idle Maximum *
29.1
27.6
5%
27.5
5%
24.9
14%
29.8
-2%
30.4
-4%
Load Average *
47
36
23%
50.9
-8%
50.1
-7%
45.7
3%
46
2%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
44
35.4
20%
50.8
-15%
50
-14%
47.7
-8%
45.9
-4%
Load Maximum *
47.1
38.2
19%
50.9
-8%
50.2
-7%
47.4
-1%
46
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
35.4

* ... smaller is better

温度

得益于材料的选择,Minisforum EliteMini AI370 在机箱高温方面没有任何问题。我们在压力测试中仅记录到略高于 40 °C的温度。处理器本身在满载情况下温度高达 90 °C。根据规格,AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 的设计最高工作温度可达 100 °C。

压力测试 Prime95,单人
压力测试 Prime95,单人
压力测试 FurMark,独奏
压力测试 FurMark,独奏
压力测试 Prime95 和 FurMark
压力测试 Prime95 和 FurMark

压力测试中的 Minisforum EliteMini AI370

返回顶部
返回顶部
底部
底部
背面的风扇出口
背面的风扇出口
电源
电源
Max. Load
 39.9 °C40 °C41.2 °C 
 37.8 °C38.5 °C40.5 °C 
 32.6 °C36.5 °C37.8 °C 
Maximum: 41.2 °C
Average: 38.3 °C
40.1 °C42.3 °C39.4 °C
34.9 °C29.6 °C34.9 °C
37.2 °C34.2 °C32.6 °C
Maximum: 42.3 °C
Average: 36.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  49.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Mini PC.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.6 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the class Mini PC.

电源管理 - 节俭高效

产品 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370在不增加能耗的情况下,性能明显提高。这一点在查看效率概览时就会非常清楚。与传统台式电脑相比,迷你电脑通常非常节俭,所需的能源更少。闲置时,Minisforum EliteMini AI370 仅需 3.4 至 7.4 瓦,使我们的测试样品成为本次比较中最节俭的设备。在平均负载情况下,其功率需求上升到 71 瓦,但我们注意到其峰值负载值为 82.6 瓦。在我们的测试中,该电源的最大输出功率为 120 瓦,工作稳定可靠。

Minisforum EliteMini AI370 及其电源(19.5 V;6.32 A)
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 及其电源(19.5 V;6.32 A)
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.9 / 4.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.4 / 4.9 / 7.4 Watt
Load midlight 70.7 / 82.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
Aoostar GEM12
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
Geekom GT1 Mega
Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
Geekom AX8 Pro
R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
Khadas Mind 2
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
Average AMD Radeon 890M
 
Average of class Mini PC
 
Power Consumption
-63%
-22%
-118%
-38%
-43%
-34%
-85%
Idle Minimum *
3.4
8.2
-141%
4.1
-21%
14
-312%
4.2
-24%
9
-165%
6.18 ?(2.7 - 8.6, n=12)
-82%
Idle Average *
4.9
10
-104%
6.6
-35%
15.9
-224%
7.2
-47%
9.7
-98%
Idle Maximum *
7.4
14.6
-97%
11.3
-53%
19.5
-164%
13
-76%
12.5
-69%
9.77 ?(5.5 - 14, n=12)
-32%
Load Average *
70.7
73.9
-5%
65.8
7%
76.4
-8%
68.5
3%
49.7
30%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
69.6
79.9
-15%
69.4
-0%
54.3
22%
74.1
-6%
51.3
26%
Load Maximum *
82.6
95.3
-15%
104.8
-27%
99.1
-20%
144.9
-75%
65.5
21%

* ... smaller is better

Efficiency overview

Performance Rating - Percent
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
100 pt
Khadas Mind 2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
79.2 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M
79 pt
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
70.5 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
62.7 pt

Power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.89 (4.05-7.46)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø6.65 (4.54-11.3)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.26 (4.91-13.1)
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø72.6 (70.7-82.6)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø75.4 (64.2-104.8)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø114.7 (100.9-144.9)
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø69.6 (67.9-79.3)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø69.4 (66.7-76.7)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø74.1 (62.4-78.7)
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø70.8 (67.7-81.7)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø65.8 (59-72.8)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø68.5 (60-97.6)

Power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø71.6 (69.2-81.8)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø75.6 (62.9-104.6)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø104.2 (91.4-142.7)
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø72.6 (65.4-77.7)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø95.8 (95-96.5)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø118.5 (109.4-137.5)
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø28.7 (26.3-47.9)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31.3 (15.7-81.3)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø35.3 (25.6-81.6)
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø67.8 (65-77.1)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø95.5 (94-96.6)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø93.8 (87.6-109.2)
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø72.4 (66.6-74.6)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø58.2 (56.2-74.2)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø56.6 (55.1-70.1)

Notebookcheck 总评分

Minisforum EliteMini AI370 是一款功能强大的迷你电脑,其紧凑的设计和高端的硬件令人印象深刻。由于采用了现代处理器和强大的 iGPU,它适用于要求苛刻的应用,并在效率方面树立了新的标准。

Minisforum EliteMini AI370 - 11/21/2024 v8
Sebastian Bade

Chassis
78 / 98 → 80%
Connectivity
60 / 81 → 74%
Weight
84%
Games Performance
57 / 80 → 71%
Application Performance
83 / 92 → 91%
Workstation
58%
AI Performance
89%
Temperature
88%
Noise
80%
Average
52%
77%
Mini PC - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
12.5%
Power Use
69.1%
Repairability
10%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 23.2%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Minisforum EliteMini AI370 评测:采用 AMD Zen 5 Strix Point APU 的迷你 PC 树立了新标准
Sebastian Bade, 2024-11-25 (Update: 2024-11-25)