Notebookcheck Logo
Geekom GT1 Mega in review

Geekom GT1 Mega 评测:Geekom 的首款 AI 迷你 PC 在各方面都不尽如人意

Geekom GT1 Mega 中的 Mega 到底是什么?

Geekom GT1 Mega 承诺在迷你 PC 外形中提供强大的性能,面向在最小空间内需要大量性能的用户。Geekom GT1 Mega 配备了英特尔酷睿超 9 185H,首次安装了带有专用 NPU 的流星湖处理器。在本次测试中,我们将从功能、性能和散热等多个方面来了解 Geekom GT1 Mega 是否令人信服。
Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Mini PC Desktop Intel Meteor Lake Business

评价:性价比不够高

Geekom GT1 Mega 是一款功能强大的迷你电脑,在许多方面都令人印象深刻。这款迷你电脑拥有强大的硬件,包括英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 185H,还配备了非常强大的 iGPU,非常适合办公应用、多媒体和轻型创意任务。

一个特别值得称道的特点是连接方式多样,这在如此小巧的设备中实属罕见。在面向未来方面,两个 USB4 接口是最有用的端口之一。内存的可扩展性和完美无瑕的做工也使 GT1 Mega 成为对空间要求不高的工作站来说极具吸引力的解决方案。

不过,我们不得不对平均和高负载下的噪音水平提出批评。一台迷你 PC 不可避免地要放置在桌面上,其附近的噪音根本不应该达到 50 dB(A)。

为什么 Geekom 没有在这方面投入更多精力,在风扇曲线方面对产品进行更好的调整,这让我们感到困惑。BIOS 选项也非常简陋。幸运的是,可以激活静音模式,但这更像是一种变通办法,而不是性能损失的适当解决方案。这不可能是一个理想的解决方案,因为根据 Geekom 的建议零售价,GT1 Mega 的售价远远超过 1000 欧元。

除了噪音大之外,Geekom GT1 Mega 是一款功能强大、灵活小巧的解决方案,非常适合办公室和家庭办公,适合在狭小空间内寻找可靠的全能电脑的用户,同时也是一款功能强大的多媒体解决方案。

Pros

+ 出色的设计
+ 完美的工艺
+ 结构非常稳定
+ 2x USB4
+ 双 2.5G LAN
+ 快速 SD 读卡器
+ Wi-Fi 7
+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H 的良好日常性能
+ 强大的 iGPU
+ 2 TB SSD 固态硬盘
+ 32 GB 内存
+ 低能耗
+ 稳定的固态硬盘性能
+ 36 个月保修

Cons

- 部分和全负荷时声音清晰
- BIOS 选项有限
- 没有可手动定制的风扇控制
- 无 OCuLink 接口
- 价格昂贵

价格和供应情况

我们评测配置中的 Geekom GT1 Mega在德国 Geekom 的售价为 1149 欧元,目前在美国 Geekom 的售价为 989 美元。搭载英特尔酷睿 7 155H 处理器的 GT1 Mega仅售 899 欧元 849 美元,性价比更高。

在美国,买家也可以通过亚马逊订购Geekom GT1 Mega

Amazon Logo
$989.00
GEEKOM GT1 Mega AI Mini PC,14th Gen Intel Core Ultra U9-185H Processor (16C/22T,up to 5.1 GHz),32GB DDR5 2TB PCIe Gen4 SSD,Mini Desktop Computers Windows 11 Pro,WiFi 7/BT 5.4/Dual 2.5G LAN/USB4.0/8K
  • $799.00
    GEEKOM GT1 Mega AI Mini PC,14th Gen Intel Core Ultra U7-155H (16C/22T,up to 4.8 GHz),32GB DDR5 1TB PCIe Gen4 SSD,NUC14 Pro Mini Desktop Computers Windows 11 Pro,WiFi 7/BT 5.4/Dual 2.5G LAN/USB4.0/8K
  • $39.99
    PowerHOOD 120W AC/DC Adapter Compatible with GEEKOM GT1 Mega Mini PC Ultra U7-155H/U9-185H 32GB RAM Mini Computers Mini Desktop PC 120W Power Supply Cord Battery Charger Cable PSU

Price comparison

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Geizhals
Weight
Height
Display
1.
78.8%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD
Listenpreis 1149 EUR
Geizhals Suche
693 g46.9 mmx
2.
78.4%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H ⎘
AMD Radeon 780M ⎘
32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD
Listenpreis 999 EUR548 g37 mmx
3.
74.7%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H ⎘
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU ⎘
, 2048 GB SSD
Bestpreis 474.9€ alza.de
2. 485.9€ alza.at
3. 498.1€ bueromarkt-ag.de
525 g37 mmx
4.
74.5%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H ⎘
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Listenpreis 879 EUR
Geizhals Suche
797 g49 mmx
5.
72.1%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H ⎘
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘
32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD
Listenpreis 930 EUR440 g37 mmx
6.
83.4% v7 (old)
Acemagic F2A
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Listenpreis 1199 EUR768 g57 mmx

Geekom GT1 Mega 是 Geekom 最新推出的迷你 PC,首次采用了英特尔流星湖处理器。从外观上看,Geekom GT1 Mega 让人想起了 Geekom GT13 Pro.

不过,Geekom 在设计上做了一些重大改变。第一眼看上去,Geekom GT1 Mega 的体积明显更大。我们很快就会研究它是否有任何固有的优势。

在本次测试中,我们主要测试 Geekom GT1 Mega 的顶级配置。它配备了 英特尔酷睿超 9 185H32 GB 内存和 2 TB 固态硬盘。不过,就价格而言,这款迷你电脑的售价为 1149 欧元或 989 美元,并不便宜。尽管如此,Geekom 以偶尔推出一两次折扣活动而闻名,如果你打算购买这款设备,可以投机取巧。

如果您的预算在 899 欧元左右,还可以在 Geekom GT1 Mega 上配备 英特尔酷睿 7 155H32GB内存和1TB固态硬盘。一开始,这似乎是一个更明智的配置,因为这两款处理器之间的技术差异微乎其微。

Geekom GT1 Mega 还与华硕、Minisforum 和 Acemagic 等其他制造商的成熟迷你 PC 竞争。不过,GT1 Mega 也面临着来自自身的竞争,因为 Geekom 本身目前的产品组合中也有其他几款高性能迷你 PC。

规格

Geekom GT1 Mega
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H 16 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 70 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Core: 2350 MHz, 32.0.101.6079
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5-5600, max 64 GB
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8 , 2048 GB 
, 1760 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5mm combo, Card Reader: Full-Size-SD-Card (UHS II), Intel Ethernet Controller I226-V (10/2500MBit/s)
Networking
Intel Ethernet Controller I226-V (10/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 46.9 x 135 x 132
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Additional features
120-Watt-Power-Adapter, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
693 g, Power Supply: 256 g
Price
1149 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

底盘完美的铝制外壳

Geekom GT1 Mega 比以前的 Geekom 迷你电脑大得多。这并不是主要问题,因为它允许使用更强大的散热装置。

在材料的选择上,Geekom 主要采用了铝合金材料,深灰色的外观看起来非常有质感。该设备的制造质量没有什么可批评的,因为它看起来做工完美。考虑到价格,这也在意料之中。

底部由塑料制成,与我们在 Geekom GT13 Pro 上看到的类似。较大的设计对重量也有影响。我们的测试样品重量略低于 700 克,比 Acemagic F2A 或 Minisforum UH125 Pro 稍轻。

电源重量为 256 克,与 Geekom AX8 Pro 或 Geekom GT13 Pro 重量相当。我们在此比较的所有 Geekom 设备都配备了相同的电源装置。

Geekom GT1 Mega 还可以通过附带的 VESA 支架直接安装到显示器上。

尺寸比较

146 mm 146 mm 57 mm 768 g145 mm 145 mm 49 mm 797 g135 mm 132 mm 46.9 mm 693 g117 mm 112 mm 37 mm 548 g117 mm 112 mm 37 mm 525 g112.4 mm 112.4 mm 37 mm 440 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

功能大量端口,包括 2x USB4

Geekom 利用 GT1 Mega 较大的设计优势,为其配备了丰富的端口选择。USB Type A 端口共有 6 个,应该不会缺少。

至于正面的四个接口是否有用,大家可以自己回答。Geekom 还在后部安装了两个额外的 USB4 端口,这意味着迷你电脑还可以与外置显卡等配合使用。

后部的两个 HDMI 输出可用于视频输出。 结合两个 USB4 端口,最多可同时操作四台显示器。位于左侧的快速 SD 读卡器不容忽视,应予以肯定。

我们通过 USB4 接口测定的性能有些令人沮丧。与Minisforum MS-A1Khadas Mind 2 相比,我们测试的固态硬盘(ADATA SE920 )的连续读取率相形见绌。

正面:Geekom GT1 Mega 的外部连接(图片来源:Geekom)
正面:Geekom GT1 Mega 的外部连接(图片来源:Geekom)
后部:Geekom GT1 Mega 的外部连接(图片来源:Geekom)
后部:Geekom GT1 Mega 的外部连接(图片来源:Geekom)
通过 USB4 检查 ADATA SE920 的性能
通过 USB4 检查 ADATA SE920 的性能
ADATA SE920 支持 PCIe 4.0 x4
ADATA SE920 支持 PCIe 4.0 x4

SD 读卡器

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
214.4 MB/s
Khadas Mind
Intel Core i7-1360P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
181.79 MB/s -15%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
176.8 MB/s -18%
Geekom Mini IT13
Intel Core i9-13900H
154.449 MB/s -28%
Geekom Mini IT12
Intel Core i7-1260P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
129.2 MB/s -40%
Average of class Mini PC
  (15.1 - 214, n=26, last 2 years)
91.7 MB/s -57%
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
65 MB/s -70%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
220.9 MB/s
Khadas Mind
Intel Core i7-1360P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
200.48 MB/s -9%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
182.5 MB/s -17%
Geekom Mini IT13
Intel Core i9-13900H
180.4 MB/s -18%
Geekom Mini IT12
Intel Core i7-1260P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
176.8 MB/s -20%
Average of class Mini PC
  (18.2 - 221, n=26, last 2 years)
106.6 MB/s -52%
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
69.9 MB/s -68%
Connectivity - USB 3.x / USB4 / TB - AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Minisforum MS-A1
Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 8700G, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3245.45 MB/s
Khadas Mind 2
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
3165.4 MB/s
Average of class Mini PC
  (1611 - 3245, n=4, last 2 years)
2808 MB/s
Geekom GT1 Mega
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
1611.37 MB/s

交流

英特尔 Wi-Fi 7 BE200 无线局域网模块
英特尔 Wi-Fi 7 BE200 无线局域网模块

Geekom 在 GT1 Mega 上安装了英特尔 Wi-Fi 7 BE200。该 Wi-Fi 模块可在 2.4 GHz、5 GHz 和 6 GHz 频率范围内运行。

我们在本次测试中的测量仅限于 5 GHz 和 6 GHz 频段。与竞争对手相比,结果令人沮丧。从结果可以看出,为了达到最佳性能,应尽可能使用 6 GHz 频段。

测试是结合华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 测试路由器进行的。通过 RJ-45 以太网可以实现更高的数据传输。Geekom 安装了两个 LAN 插座,数据传输速率最高可达 2.5 GBit/s。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Acemagic F2A
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1770 (1584min - 1790max) MBit/s +54%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1755 (1737min - 1766max) MBit/s +53%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1729 (1594min - 1755max) MBit/s +50%
Geekom AX8 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1657 (1619min - 1670max) MBit/s +44%
Geekom GT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1583 (1557min - 1611max) MBit/s +38%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
  (1149 - 1770, n=13)
1526 MBit/s +33%
Average of class Mini PC
  (684 - 1771, n=54, last 2 years)
1378 MBit/s +20%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1149 (666min - 1346max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Geekom AX8 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1800 (1737min - 1904max) MBit/s +45%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1615 (767min - 1670max) MBit/s +30%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1605 (1238min - 1652max) MBit/s +29%
Geekom GT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1429 (1392min - 1511max) MBit/s +15%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
  (943 - 1646, n=13)
1383 MBit/s +11%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1379 (1299min - 1425max) MBit/s +11%
Average of class Mini PC
  (394 - 1800, n=54, last 2 years)
1322 MBit/s +6%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1242 (1110min - 1348max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Geekom GT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1398 (1261min - 1453max) MBit/s +57%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1379 (1016min - 1613max) MBit/s +55%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
  (838 - 1701, n=17)
1356 MBit/s +53%
Geekom AX8 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
979 (962min - 989max) MBit/s +10%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
936 (907min - 946max) MBit/s +5%
Average of class Mini PC
  (192.9 - 1796, n=112, last 2 years)
925 MBit/s +4%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
888 (825min - 926max) MBit/s
Acemagic F2A
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
838 (728min - 926max) MBit/s -6%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1331 (1187min - 1442max) MBit/s +80%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
  (469 - 1634, n=17)
1183 MBit/s +60%
Geekom GT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1146 (846min - 1308max) MBit/s +55%
Geekom AX8 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
966 (921min - 1008max) MBit/s +30%
Average of class Mini PC
  (184.1 - 1776, n=112, last 2 years)
859 MBit/s +16%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
758 (727min - 793max) MBit/s +2%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
741 (690min - 797max) MBit/s
Acemagic F2A
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
709 (369min - 977max) MBit/s -4%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
Geekom GT1 Mega Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1242 (1110-1348)
Geekom AX8 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1800 (1737-1904)
Geekom GT1 Mega Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1126 (666-1346)
Geekom AX8 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1656 (1619-1670)
Geekom GT1 Mega Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø887 (825-926)
Geekom AX8 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø978 (962-989)
Geekom GT1 Mega Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø741 (690-797)
Geekom AX8 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø966 (921-1008)

配件

Geekom GT1 Mega 随附一个 120 W 的电源装置。此外还有一条 HDMI 线和一个 VESA 安装板,这是标准的供货范围。

制造商还提供了用户手册,其中介绍了连接选项以及内存和固态硬盘的安装等。

Geekom GT1 Mega 的供货范围
Geekom GT1 Mega 的供货范围

维护

Geekom GT1 Mega 总是与预装内存和固态硬盘一起出售。相反,这意味着 GT1 Mega 可以立即投入使用。不过,只要掌握一点技巧,还是可以打开设备的。

这里的步骤与 Geekom GT13 Pro 类似,尽管 G1 Mega 只是稍大一些。胶粘的橡胶脚垫下藏着四颗小螺丝,必须先拧开才能取下底部。另一块金属板挡住了通往已安装组件的道路,如果要访问内存、固态硬盘或 WLAN 模块,必须先卸下金属板。

还有一个空闲的 M.2 插槽,这意味着 Geekom GT1 Mega 可以配备两个固态硬盘。从技术上讲,第二个 M.2 插槽可同时容纳 NVMe 和 SATA 固态硬盘。不过,固态硬盘的长度限制为 42 毫米。

底部开放的 Geekom GT1 Mega
底部开放的 Geekom GT1 Mega
螺丝位于橡胶脚垫下
带冷却装置的电路板
电路板
Geekom GT1 Mega 拆解图

可持续性

Geekom GT1 Mega 是一款小巧的微型电脑,这意味着在出现故障时几乎不可能进行维修。不过,Geekom 提供 36 个月的保修服务,这使它在这方面有别于大多数其他制造商。

Geekom 包装小巧,运输方便,值得称赞。在可持续发展方面,Geekom 宣称其耗电量低于传统台式电脑。不过,Geekom 并没有详细说明在生产过程中是否使用了可回收材料。

性能:Geekom 首次安装人工智能处理器

Geekom 首次安装了 英特尔酷睿超 9 185H由于其设计,它还能特别高效地执行特殊的人工智能计算。加上 32GB DDR5 内存,几乎可以胜任所有任务。其他设备变体基于 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H提供类似的性能,并具有相同的创新。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO

测试条件

我们使用 "高性能 "能源配置文件进行了所有性能测试。我们没有改变 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H 的性能,而是根据 BIOS 设置将其保留在正常模式下。

根据我们的测试标准,偏离节能计划仅用于能耗测量。 测试标准.

Geekom GT1 Mega - BIOS 选项
Geekom GT1 Mega - BIOS 选项
Geekom GT1 Mega - BIOS 选项
Geekom GT1 Mega - BIOS 选项
Geekom GT1 Mega - BIOS 选项
Geekom GT1 Mega - BIOS 选项

处理器

顶级的 Geekom GT1 Mega 配备了 英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 185H.16 个内核共 22 个线程确保了较高的工作速度,这主要体现在多线程任务中。

不过,我们的测试样本在单核性能方面也毫不逊色。GT1 Mega 经常在基准测试结果中遥遥领先。总体而言,我们的测试样本在比较中稳居第二。最强劲的竞争对手是 Geekom AX8 Pro我们测试过的 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS.

关于功耗,值得一提的是,Geekom 是按照制造商的规格来运行 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H。交付时,BIOS 中的正常模式配置文件处于激活状态。这意味着 SoC 在持续负载下的运行功耗为 45 W,但在 Turbo 模式下可高达 70 W。

正常模式外,Geekom GT1 Mega 还可在静音模式性能模式下运行。这对处理器的功率限制影响不大,但也会在一定程度上改变性能。我们对不同模式进行了一些测试,并在表格中进行了总结。

结果显示,性能模式下的性能优势并不明显。为了减少噪音负荷,我们建议使用静音模式。当然,由此带来的性能损失是可以承受的。

有关进一步的比较和基准测试,请参阅我们的CPU 比较表

功率模式 PL1/PL2 单位:瓦 Cinebench R15 1T Cinebench R15 nT Cinebench R20 1T Cinebench R20 nT Cinebench R23 1T Cinebench R23 nT
静音模式 45/50 260 2,430 696 6,403 1,820 16,536
正常模式 45/70 262 2,794 696 7,192 1,774 18,608
性能模式 65/70 264 2,800 704 7,213 1,826 18,739

Cinebench 结果:正常模式 - PL2 70 瓦;PL1 45 瓦

Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R23
Cinebench R23
Cinebench 2024
Cinebench 2024
Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
56.6 pt
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
56.1 pt
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
55.3 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
53.5 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
50.9 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
50.1 pt
Cinebench 2024
CPU Multi Core
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1022 Points +11%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
924 Points
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
852 Points -8%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
815 Points -12%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
814 Points -12%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
703 Points -24%
CPU Single Core
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
107 Points 0%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
107 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
106 Points -1%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
104 Points -3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
102 Points -5%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
97 Points -9%
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
18608 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
18497 Points -1%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
15516 Points -17%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
14564 Points -22%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
14516 Points -22%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
13015 Points -30%
Single Core
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
1808 Points +2%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1774 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1771 Points 0%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1721 Points -3%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1715 Points -3%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1640 Points -8%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
703 Points +1%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
696 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
679 Points -2%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
659 Points -5%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
629 Points -10%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
622 Points -11%
CPU (Multi Core)
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7192 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7188 Points 0%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
6153 Points -14%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
5618 Points -22%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
5617 Points -22%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
5013 Points -30%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
284 Points +8%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
262 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
258 Points -2%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
248 Points -5%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
245 Points -6%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
235 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2794 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2738 Points -2%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
2521 Points -10%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
2260 Points -19%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
2245 Points -20%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
2141 Points -23%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
3.28 Points +5%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3.13 Points 0%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3.13 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
3.03 Points -3%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
2.98 Points -5%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
2.86 Points -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
34.34 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
33.49 Points -2%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
29.14 Points -15%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
27.48 Points -20%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
27.02 Points -21%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
26.92 Points -22%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
14451 Points +3%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13997 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13938 Points 0%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
13820 Points -1%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
13281 Points -5%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
12858 Points -8%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
95005 Points +4%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
91553 Points
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
84253 Points -8%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
79014 Points -14%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
78817 Points -14%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
78788 Points -14%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
262 Seconds * -37%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
230 Seconds * -20%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
228 Seconds * -19%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
206 Seconds * -8%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
191 Seconds *
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
178 Seconds * +7%
wPrime 2.10
32m
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
4.48 s * -37%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
4.107 s * -26%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3.523 s * -8%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
3.518 s * -8%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3.271 s *
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
2.688 s * +18%
1024m
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
412.775 s * -150%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
246.982 s * -50%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
165.075 s *
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
148.994 s * +10%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
139.617 s * +15%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
74.917 s * +55%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 1
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
336.5 (329min - 346max) fps
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
325 (323min - 328max) fps -3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
308.5 (306min - 311max) fps -8%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
304.5 (304min - 306max) fps -10%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
300.5 (288min - 319max) fps -11%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
300 (299min - 301max) fps -11%
Pass 2
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
161.5 (159.8min - 163.8max) fps
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
154.15 (153.8min - 154.3max) fps -5%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
141.2 (141min - 143.9max) fps -13%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
134 (133.7min - 134.5max) fps -17%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
132.3 (129.2min - 135max) fps -18%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
113.95 (106.5min - 136.6max) fps -29%
WinRAR - Result
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
8563 KB/s
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
7744 KB/s -10%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7723 KB/s -10%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
6800 KB/s -21%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
6315 KB/s -26%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
5594 KB/s -35%
TrueCrypt
AES Mean 100MB
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
14.5 GB/s +32%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
13.2 GB/s +20%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
11 GB/s
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10.6 GB/s -4%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
9 GB/s -18%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
8.8 GB/s -20%
Twofish Mean 100MB
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
2.4 GB/s +26%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
2.1 GB/s +11%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1.9 GB/s
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1.7 GB/s -11%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1.4 GB/s -26%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1.4 GB/s -26%
Serpent Mean 100MB
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
1.3 GB/s +18%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1.2 GB/s +9%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1.1 GB/s
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1 GB/s -9%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
0.869 GB/s -21%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
0.854 GB/s -22%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13763 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12662 Points -8%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
11980 Points -13%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
11283 Points -18%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
10856 Points -21%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
10788 Points -22%
Single-Core
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
1994 Points +8%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1852 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1841 Points -1%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1746 Points -6%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1685 Points -9%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1593 Points -14%
Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Multi-Core
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13822 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12438 Points -10%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
11804 Points -15%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
11168 Points -19%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
10747 Points -22%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
10676 Points -23%
5.0 Single-Core
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
1907 Points +6%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1810 Points +1%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1797 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1708 Points -5%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1659 Points -8%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1596 Points -11%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
8140 Points +8%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
7787 Points +4%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7516 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
6964 Points -7%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6927 Points -8%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
6734 Points -10%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
49924 Points
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
47917 Points -4%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
45250 Points -9%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
41851 Points -16%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
38793 Points -22%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
38648 Points -23%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
22340 Points +23%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
20846 Points +15%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
18383 Points +1%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
18130 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
17624 Points -3%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
17138 Points -5%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
71050 MIPS
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
66557 MIPS -6%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
66438 MIPS -6%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
52479 MIPS -26%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
0 MIPS -100%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
0 MIPS -100%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
6691 MIPS +18%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
6321 MIPS +12%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
5657 MIPS
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5485 MIPS -3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
5136 MIPS -9%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
4699 MIPS -17%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
20.6 fps +2%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
20.2 fps
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19.6 fps -3%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
16.7 fps -17%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
15.7 fps -22%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
14.1 fps -30%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
0.513 sec * -12%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
0.4982 sec * -9%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4652 sec * -2%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
0.4576 sec * -0%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
0.4571 sec *
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4395 sec * +4%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
70.9 s * -36%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
55.7 s * -7%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
52.1 s *
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
49.8 s * +4%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
44.5 s * +15%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
39.4 s * +24%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
309 Points +8%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
304 Points +6%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
286 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
276 Points -3%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
254 Points -11%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
254 Points -11%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
595 ms * -15%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
567 ms * -9%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
535 ms * -3%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
518 ms *
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
517 ms * -0%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
506 ms * +2%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
27363 Points +12%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
25043 Points +3%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
24366 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
23626 Points -3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
22863 Points -6%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
21391 Points -12%
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
10844 Points +12%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10014 Points +3%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
9687 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
9347 Points -4%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
9182 Points -5%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
8719 Points -10%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
7.744 s * -15%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
7.445 s * -10%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
7.444 s * -10%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7.168 s * -6%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
6.962 s * -3%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
6.762 s *
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
17.404 s * -17%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
16.967 s * -14%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
16.446 s * -10%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
16.234 s * -9%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16.125 s * -8%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14.928 s *
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
644.49 s * -76%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
423.565 s * -15%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
417.103 s * -14%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
394.754 s * -8%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
394.697 s * -8%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
366.851 s *
Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Multi CPU)
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
792 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
770 Points -3%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
615 Points -22%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
603 Points -24%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
594 Points -25%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
547 Points -31%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
9719
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
21485 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
91553 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
13997 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
19892
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
61959
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
2.74 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
30.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
111.51 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
3.13 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
34.34 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
111.5 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
262 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2794 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
163.41 fps
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
696 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7192 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
18608 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1774 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
107 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
924 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M
96.7 pt
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
80.2 pt
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
77.3 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
65.3 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
64.5 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58.5 pt
Average of class Mini PC
 
57 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M
24531 KRay/s +62%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
17544 KRay/s +16%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
15184 KRay/s
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
13639 KRay/s -10%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
13347 KRay/s -12%
Average of class Mini PC
  (561 - 51004, n=120, last 2 years)
12271 KRay/s -19%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
11735 KRay/s -23%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M
106518 Points +36%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
88829 Points +13%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
78346 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
70880 Points -10%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
68551 Points -13%
Average of class Mini PC
  (3604 - 214250, n=120, last 2 years)
62244 Points -21%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
59094 Points -25%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M
4684 MB/s +25%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
4246 MB/s +13%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
3753 MB/s
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
3404 MB/s -9%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
3323 MB/s -11%
Average of class Mini PC
  (225 - 9399, n=120, last 2 years)
2739 MB/s -27%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2718 MB/s -28%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M
114586 Points +32%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
93952 Points +8%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
89748 Points +3%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
86969 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
79866 Points -8%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
78098 Points -10%
Average of class Mini PC
  (8172 - 184747, n=120, last 2 years)
77996 Points -10%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M
14631 Points +42%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
10289 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
10247 Points 0%
Average of class Mini PC
  (408 - 29064, n=120, last 2 years)
8472 Points -18%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
8026 Points -22%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
7851 Points -24%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
7842 Points -24%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M
56505 Points +45%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
45718 Points +17%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
38945 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
35321 Points -9%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
34225 Points -12%
Average of class Mini PC
  (1958 - 113499, n=120, last 2 years)
32479 Points -17%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
29138 Points -25%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M
163032 MB/s +18%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
144741 MB/s +5%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
138481 MB/s
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
102677 MB/s -26%
Average of class Mini PC
  (3691 - 325960, n=120, last 2 years)
85778 MB/s -38%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
65304 MB/s -53%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
64107 MB/s -54%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1183 MB/s 0%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
1181 MB/s
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
994 MB/s -16%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M
976 MB/s -17%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
969 MB/s -18%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
789 MB/s -33%
Average of class Mini PC
  (74.8 - 2039, n=120, last 2 years)
709 MB/s -40%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M
13609 KRay/s +72%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
9284 KRay/s +17%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
7925 KRay/s
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
7221 KRay/s -9%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
6786 KRay/s -14%
Average of class Mini PC
  (308 - 26952, n=120, last 2 years)
6561 KRay/s -17%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
6205 KRay/s -22%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
47377 MPixel/s +1%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
47032 MPixel/s
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
45789 MPixel/s -3%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M
40114 MPixel/s -15%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
33092 MPixel/s -30%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
28269 MPixel/s -40%
Average of class Mini PC
  (4408 - 50500, n=120, last 2 years)
27655 MPixel/s -41%

Cinebench R15 多核循环

在 Cinebench R15 多核连续循环测试中,单项成绩在启动后不久略有下降。在性能对比中,它仍足以稳居第二。

只有 Acemagic F2A的性能一直较高。在 Geekom AX8 Pro无法保持较高的 CPU 性能,这就是为什么它在持续负载下性能会明显下降并滑入中游。

从 Cinebench R15 连续循环的遥测数据(我们在所有性能模式下运行了一次)可以看出,处理器达到了设定的性能极限。

Cinebench R15 循环期间的 CPU 指标(静音模式)
Cinebench R15 循环期间的 CPU 指标(静音模式)
Cinebench R15 循环期间的 CPU 指标(正常模式)
Cinebench R15 循环期间的 CPU 指标(正常模式)
Cinebench R15 循环期间的 CPU 指标(性能模式)
Cinebench R15 循环期间的 CPU 指标(性能模式)
01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Geekom GT1 Mega Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2442 (2286.63-2795.05)
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H: Ø2223 (2100.4-2438.43)
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H: Ø2021 (1900.15-2203.13)
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H: Ø2186 (2040.4-2248.33)
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø1776 (1688.48-2326.12)
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2759 (2690.7-2800.92)

系统性能

Geekom GT1 Mega 在系统测试中表现出色。除了一个例外,我们的测试样品总是能获得第一名。这也反映了我们在测试期间的主观性能感受。

在性能方面没有任何问题,即使同时安装多个应用程序也没有给这台迷你电脑带来不可能完成的任务。由于内存容量充足,因此还可以同时管理多个浏览器标签页。

PCMark 10 / Score
Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N7000
7553 Points +4%
Geekom GT1 Mega, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
7232 Points
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
7120 Points -2%
Asus NUC 14 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
6282 Points -13%
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
6194 Points -14%
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
5944 Points -18%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N7000
11227 Points +4%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
11125 Points +3%
Geekom GT1 Mega, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
10824 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
10347 Points -4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
10050 Points -7%
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
9427 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N7000
10774 Points +22%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
8901 Points +1%
Geekom GT1 Mega, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
8797 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
7715 Points -12%
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
7319 Points -17%
Asus NUC 14 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
7042 Points -20%
CrossMark / Overall
Geekom GT1 Mega, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
1888 Points
Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N7000
1865 Points -1%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1802 Points -5%
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
1766 Points -6%
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1533 Points -19%
Asus NUC 14 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
1522 Points -19%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Geekom GT1 Mega, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
1864 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
1790 Points -4%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1700 Points -9%
Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N7000
1583 Points -15%
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1332 Points -29%
Asus NUC 14 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
1171 Points -37%
CrossMark / Creativity
Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N7000
2057 Points +5%
Geekom GT1 Mega, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
1959 Points
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1929 Points -2%
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
1789 Points -9%
Asus NUC 14 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
1765 Points -10%
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1683 Points -14%
CrossMark / Productivity
Geekom GT1 Mega, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
1827 Points
Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N7000
1786 Points -2%
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
1736 Points -5%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1717 Points -6%
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1463 Points -20%
Asus NUC 14 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
1432 Points -22%
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
73624 MB/s
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
69592 MB/s -5%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
69264 MB/s -6%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M
68924 MB/s -6%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
62397 MB/s -15%
Average of class Mini PC
  (6481 - 89287, n=120, last 2 years)
47249 MB/s -36%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
45721 MB/s -38%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
79371 MB/s
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
74415 MB/s -6%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
72711 MB/s -8%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
64323 MB/s -19%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M
61624 MB/s -22%
Average of class Mini PC
  (6914 - 98398, n=120, last 2 years)
47920 MB/s -40%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
45995 MB/s -42%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M
87138 MB/s +21%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
72443 MB/s 0%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
72187 MB/s
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
71514 MB/s -1%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
65057 MB/s -10%
Average of class Mini PC
  (6862 - 98583, n=120, last 2 years)
51648 MB/s -28%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
45733 MB/s -37%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
184.8 ns * -35%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
149 ns * -9%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
136.7 ns *
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
127.3 ns * +7%
Average of class Mini PC
  (44.9 - 184.8, n=120, last 2 years)
91.7 ns * +33%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M
91.4 ns * +33%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
75.8 ns * +45%

* ... smaller is better

NPU 性能

英特尔 英特尔酷睿至尊 9 185H配备了 NPU(神经处理单元),使 SoC 能够特别高效地计算人工智能应用。为了说明性能比较,我们使用了 UL Procyon AI 接口基准测试。

所有对比设备都基于英特尔 Meteor Lake 处理器,这意味着它们都使用相同的 NPU。各个竞争对手之间的差距非常小。Geekom GT1 Mega 以微弱优势胜出。

UL Procyon for Windows / Overall Score Integer NPU
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
529 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
508 Points -4%
Khadas Mind 2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
504 Points -5%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
501 Points -5%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
499 Points -6%
UL Procyon for Windows / Overall Score Integer GPU
Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, Arc A770
1500 Points +87%
Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, Arc A750
1433 Points +79%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
801 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
741 Points -7%
Khadas Mind 2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
687 Points -14%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
684 Points -15%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
547 Points -32%

DPC 延迟

从结果来看,Geekom GT1 Mega 的表现优于对比设备。在使用 Edge 浏览器上网时,我们没有发现 DPC 延迟增加的情况,而在播放 4K 测试视频时,情况有所改变。

不过,这些值并不是非常高,这意味着我们的测试设备在对比中仍然提供了最好的结果。

打开多个浏览器标签页时的最大延迟
打开多个浏览器标签页时的最大延迟
播放 4K 视频时的最大延迟
播放 4K 视频时的最大延迟
Prime95 十秒后的最大延迟时间
Prime95 十秒后的最大延迟时间
按最长执行时间排列的驱动程序
按最长执行时间排列的驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
2776 μs * -142%
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
2724 μs * -138%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
1856 μs * -62%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
1533.4 μs * -34%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1438 μs * -26%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
1145.7 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

Crucial P3 Plus 2 TB 固态硬盘
Crucial P3 Plus 2 TB 固态硬盘

正如前面多次提到的,我们测试的是 Geekom GT1 Mega 的顶级配置。这意味着该机型配备了 2 TB SSD,可以存储大量数据。

更确切地说,它是以 PCIe 4.0 x4 速度运行的 Crucial P3 Plus。该大容量存储系统在测试中取得了优异成绩,我们的测试设备将所有竞争对手甩在了后面。

此外,Crucial P3 Plus 还出色地通过了压力测试,因此预计性能不会下降。Geekom GT1 Mega 可容纳两块固态硬盘。除了已安装的固态硬盘外,还可以安装另一块M.2固态硬盘。不过,你必须注意 42 毫米的总长度。技术上支持 NVMe SATA 固态硬盘。

有关进一步的比较和基准,请参阅我们的 固态硬盘比较表.

AS 固态硬盘
AS 固态硬盘
CDM 3
CDM 3
CDM 5
CDM 5
CDM 6
CDM 6
CDI
CDI
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
Sequential Read: 2822 MB/s
Sequential Write: 4310 MB/s
512K Read: 2054 MB/s
512K Write: 4132 MB/s
4K Read: 57.7 MB/s
4K Write: 315.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 844 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 550 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
88.4 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
80.8 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000
67.3 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
61.8 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
51.6 pt
Average of class Mini PC
 
48.9 pt
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
48.4 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
4357 (4314.26min - 4356.72max) MB/s +59%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000
3921 (3897.31min - 3920.75max) MB/s +43%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
3706 (3594.04min - 3706.37max) MB/s +36%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
2734 (2730.27min - 2734.25max) MB/s
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2351 (2320.68min - 2350.61max) MB/s -14%
Average of class Mini PC
  (233 - 4357, n=120, last 2 years)
2296 MB/s -16%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1674 (1242.56min - 1673.54max) MB/s -39%
seq write
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
4544 (4380.79min - 4543.83max) MB/s +14%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
3976 (425.08min - 3975.57max) MB/s
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000
3791 (3695.18min - 3790.57max) MB/s -5%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3331 (3244.92min - 3330.75max) MB/s -16%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
2928 (1958.53min - 2927.62max) MB/s -26%
Average of class Mini PC
  (222 - 5595, n=120, last 2 years)
2438 MB/s -39%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1348 (1117.85min - 1347.87max) MB/s -66%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
7110 (6058.21min - 7110.02max) MB/s +41%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000
7012 (5624.01min - 7012.25max) MB/s +39%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
7007 (6166.72min - 7006.62max) MB/s +38%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
5060 (4781.3min - 5060.16max) MB/s
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
4802 (4169.19min - 4801.68max) MB/s -5%
Average of class Mini PC
  (236 - 8430, n=120, last 2 years)
3710 MB/s -27%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
3194 (2810.81min - 3194.17max) MB/s -37%
seq q8 t1 write
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000
5685 (5389.6min - 5684.54max) MB/s +43%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
5261 (5018.9min - 5261.3max) MB/s +32%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
4712 (3064.99min - 4711.88max) MB/s +18%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
3985 (52.74min - 3985.01max) MB/s
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3902 (3839.68min - 3901.75max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Mini PC
  (228 - 6669, n=120, last 2 years)
2738 MB/s -31%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
2212 (1222.43min - 2212.27max) MB/s -44%
4k q1 t1 read
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
85.3 (82.57min - 85.32max) MB/s +36%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
62.5 (62.22min - 62.52max) MB/s
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000
62.2 (61.55min - 62.23max) MB/s 0%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
60 (58.44min - 60.02max) MB/s -4%
Average of class Mini PC
  (5.67 - 86.6, n=120, last 2 years)
55.4 MB/s -11%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
53.4 (49.89min - 53.35max) MB/s -15%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
47.3 (47.07min - 47.31max) MB/s -24%
4k q1 t1 write
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
353 (348.24min - 353.16max) MB/s
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
327 (306.06min - 326.78max) MB/s -7%
Average of class Mini PC
  (30.4 - 435, n=120, last 2 years)
196.3 MB/s -44%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
187.2 (181.54min - 187.2max) MB/s -47%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000
187 (185.73min - 187.04max) MB/s -47%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
136.8 (131.56min - 136.81max) MB/s -61%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
83.1 (75.3min - 83.11max) MB/s -76%
4k q32 t16 read
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
3593 (3380.17min - 3593.41max) MB/s +25%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
2876 (2861.34min - 2875.92max) MB/s
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1824 (1239.47min - 1824.09max) MB/s -37%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000
1644 (1568.76min - 1643.51max) MB/s -43%
Average of class Mini PC
  (26.1 - 4158, n=120, last 2 years)
1345 MB/s -53%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
731 (660.89min - 731.29max) MB/s -75%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
698 (691.89min - 697.84max) MB/s -76%
4k q32 t16 write
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
2822 (709.76min - 2821.52max) MB/s
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1434 (1410.26min - 1433.71max) MB/s -49%
Average of class Mini PC
  (30.2 - 4288, n=120, last 2 years)
1296 MB/s -54%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
762 (700.88min - 761.76max) MB/s -73%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000
647 (598.22min - 647.4max) MB/s -77%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
311 (252.72min - 310.91max) MB/s -89%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
186.7 (155.05min - 186.74max) MB/s -93%
AS SSD
Score Total
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
8215 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
6798 Points -17%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000
5512 Points -33%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
5131 Points -38%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
4412 Points -46%
Average of class Mini PC
  (181.5 - 10021, n=118, last 2 years)
4100 Points -50%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3878 Points -53%
Score Read
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
2866 Points +3%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
2779 Points
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000
1793 Points -35%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1561 Points -44%
Average of class Mini PC
  (61 - 3741, n=118, last 2 years)
1526 Points -45%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
1275 Points -54%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1096 Points -61%
Score Write
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
3987 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
3313 Points -17%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000
2896 Points -27%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
2516 Points -37%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2306 Points -42%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
2082 Points -48%
Average of class Mini PC
  (88 - 4371, n=118, last 2 years)
1842 Points -54%
Seq Read
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
5158 MB/s +44%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000
4902 MB/s +37%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
4546 MB/s +27%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3808 MB/s +6%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
3587 MB/s
Average of class Mini PC
  (291 - 6620, n=118, last 2 years)
3176 MB/s -11%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
3010 MB/s -16%
Seq Write
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
3938 MB/s
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
3374 MB/s -14%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000
2835 MB/s -28%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
2646 MB/s -33%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
2369 MB/s -40%
Average of class Mini PC
  (240 - 5783, n=118, last 2 years)
2208 MB/s -44%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1787 MB/s -55%
4K Read
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
83.6 MB/s
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
83.4 MB/s 0%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
63.6 MB/s -24%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000
59.1 MB/s -29%
Average of class Mini PC
  (6.08 - 104.3, n=118, last 2 years)
58.8 MB/s -30%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
57.3 MB/s -31%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
41.8 MB/s -50%
4K Write
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
314 MB/s
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
296 MB/s -6%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
196.9 MB/s -37%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
182.1 MB/s -42%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000
181.4 MB/s -42%
Average of class Mini PC
  (30.9 - 366, n=118, last 2 years)
175.8 MB/s -44%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
169.5 MB/s -46%
4K-64 Read
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
2336 MB/s
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
2328 MB/s 0%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000
1244 MB/s -47%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1218 MB/s -48%
Average of class Mini PC
  (23.4 - 3220, n=118, last 2 years)
1149 MB/s -51%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
695 MB/s -70%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
658 MB/s -72%
4K-64 Write
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
3279 MB/s
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
2878 MB/s -12%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000
2431 MB/s -26%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1945 MB/s -41%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
1883 MB/s -43%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1649 MB/s -50%
Average of class Mini PC
  (32.8 - 3731, n=118, last 2 years)
1446 MB/s -56%
Access Time Read
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
0.127 ms * -370%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
0.101 ms * -274%
Average of class Mini PC
  (0.022 - 0.489, n=118, last 2 years)
0.09706 ms * -259%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000
0.079 ms * -193%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
0.053 ms * -96%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
0.046 ms * -70%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
0.027 ms *
Access Time Write
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
0.126 ms * -800%
Average of class Mini PC
  (0.014 - 0.765, n=118, last 2 years)
0.1148 ms * -720%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Acer N7000
0.064 ms * -357%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
0.059 ms * -321%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
0.043 ms * -207%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
0.024 ms * -71%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
0.014 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Disk throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
Geekom GT1 Mega Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8 ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5055 (4738.1-5067.7)
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6996 (5972.7-7027.76)
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6306 (1073.74-7111.48)
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4790 (4223.81-4803.95)
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5377 (3710.83-7006.62)
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1320 (771.89-3141.95)

图形处理器性能

Geekom GT1 Mega 的 3D 性能由 英特尔 Arc 8 核 iGPUIntel Core Ultra 9 185H.结果是非常积极的,因为 GT1 Mega 在这一领域也几乎总能获得第一名。

原本强大的 AMD Radeon 780M有时也能明显胜出。只有在渲染测试(SPECviewperf 2020)中,英特尔的 iGPU 才缺乏竞争力,远远落后于 Geekom AX8 Pro在接受度上远远落后于 Geekom AX8 Pro。

更多比较和基准测试可参见我们的 GPU 对比表.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
100 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
90.6 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
89.3 pt
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
89.3 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
78.5 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
56.4 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13309 Points
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
13281 Points 0%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12085 Points -9%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
11785 Points -11%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
10303 Points -23%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
7424 Points -44%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3610 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3205 Points -11%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
3205 Points -11%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
2852 Points -21%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
2796 Points -23%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1690 Points -53%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
8726 Points
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
8117 Points -7%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
7900 Points -9%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7710 Points -12%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
7047 Points -19%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
5812 Points -33%
Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
36.4 fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
33.3 fps -9%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
31.6 fps -13%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
30 fps -18%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
29.6 fps -19%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
25.1 fps -31%
Extreme Preset DX11
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
37.5 fps
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
36.4 fps -3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
34.5 fps -8%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32.7 fps -13%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
31.5 fps -16%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
26 fps -31%
Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
23.1 fps +15%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
20.1 fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
18.8 fps -6%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17.1 fps -15%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
16.9 fps -16%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
15.1 fps -25%
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
21.9 fps
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
20.6 fps -6%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
20.2 fps -8%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
18.3 fps -16%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
18.3 fps -16%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
15.7 fps -28%
Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
12451 Points
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
12232 Points -2%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
10872 Points -13%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10491 Points -16%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
10026 Points -19%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
6619 Points -47%
1920x1080 1080p High
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3948 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
3609 Points -9%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
3559 Points -10%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3391 Points -14%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
3066 Points -22%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
2306 Points -42%
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2119 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1981 Points -7%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1920 Points -9%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1686 Points -20%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
1649 Points -22%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1124 Points -47%
ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
8595 Points +8%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7963 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7480 Points -6%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
6698 Points -16%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
5613 Points -30%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
3650 Points -54%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
492 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
490 Points 0%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
488 Points -1%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
471 Points -4%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
427 Points -13%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
286 Points -42%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
487 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
472 Points -3%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
439 Points -10%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
427 Points -12%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
422 Points -13%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
294 Points -40%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
2362 Points +16%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2039 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1961 Points -4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1715 Points -16%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1447 Points -29%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
873 Points -57%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
2449 Points +44%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1701 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1594 Points -6%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1360 Points -20%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1112 Points -35%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
888 Points -48%
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3244 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3076 Points -5%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
2868 Points -12%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
2662 Points -18%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
2143 Points -34%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1310 Points -60%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
1068 Samples/s +63%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
801 Samples/s +22%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
710 Samples/s +8%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
656 Samples/s
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
651 Samples/s -1%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
549 Samples/s -16%
Sala GPUs-only
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2888 Samples/s
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
2807 Samples/s -3%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
2517 Samples/s -13%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2319 Samples/s -20%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
2218 Samples/s -23%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
2104 Samples/s -27%
Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU)
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
6468 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
5244 Points -19%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
5105 Points -21%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
4928 Points -24%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
4460 Points -31%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
1831 Points -72%
Geekom GT1 Mega, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Ultra 9 185H
Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Radeon 780M
R9 8945H
Asus NUC 14 Pro, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
Ultra 5 125H
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
Ultra 5 125H
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
i9-13900H
Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Ultra 7 155H
Average of class Mini PC
 
SPECviewperf 2020
223%
-13%
-19%
-27%
-13%
124%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)
7.07
12.8
81%
5.87
-17%
4.8
-32%
2.69
-62%
5.05
-29%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)
5
13.3
166%
3.81
-24%
3.38
-32%
3.17
-37%
4.61
-8%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)
19.8
35.3
78%
15.3
-23%
15.4
-22%
16.3
-18%
17.9
-10%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)
11.7
25.1
115%
10.4
-11%
9.7
-17%
8.53
-27%
10
-15%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
15.5
21.1
36%
14.5
-6%
13.2
-15%
10.3
-34%
12.9
-17%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)
5.68
65.7
1057%
5.82
2%
5.54
-2%
6.62
17%
5.7
0%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)
38.8
49.6
28%
34.7
-11%
32.8
-15%
27.3
-30%
35.4
-9%
3DMark 05 Standard
53214 points
3DMark 06 Standard Score
38204 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
43259 points
3DMark 11 Performance
13104 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
145222 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
35142 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7968 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
4087 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3984 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
781 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
3222 points
Help

游戏性能

英特尔 Arc 8 核 iGPU 英特尔弧形 8 核 iGPU在合成基准测试中的优异成绩并没有在游戏测试中得到体现。Geekom GT1 Mega 明显落后于 Geekom AX8 Pro.

在游戏测试中 AMD Radeon 780M也只能提供有限的游戏性能,在实际使用中也会受到限制。不过,一般来说,英特尔 Arc 8 核 iGPU 在处理旧版本或要求不高的游戏时性能足够。

要详细了解 iGPU 与其他显卡相比的性能,请参阅我们的 GPU 游戏列表.

GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
169.4 (3.69min, 125P1) fps +3%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
165.2 (3.77min, 100P1) fps
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
161 (4.76min, 100P1) fps -3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
156.3 (4.92min, 90.9P1) fps -5%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
132.4 (4.93min, 90.9P1) fps -20%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
119.7 (7.51min, 66.7P1) fps -28%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
65.9 (2.44min, 41.7P1) fps +51%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
43.5 (3.49min, 32.3P1) fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
39.9 (3.1min, 29.4P1) fps -8%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
38.9 (3.15min, 28.6P1) fps -11%
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
31.3 (2.94min, 22.7P1) fps -28%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
22 (6.3min, 16.4P1) fps -49%
Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
157.5 (136min) fps +43%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
110.5 (63min) fps
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
109.8 (85min) fps -1%
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
103.2 (59.8min) fps -7%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
97.1 (61.8min) fps -12%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
95.5 (63.7min) fps -14%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
88 (69.2min) fps 0%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
87.8 (28.3min) fps
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
77.3 (52.5min) fps -12%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
75.9 (45.7min) fps -14%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
73.6 (47.5min) fps -16%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
65.5 (56.1min) fps -25%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
41.3 (34.5min) fps +9%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
38 (33.3min) fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
30.1 (25.8min) fps -21%
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
29.5 (24.1min) fps -22%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
29.5 (25.4min) fps -22%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
18.2 (14.7min) fps -52%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Geekom GT1 Mega
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
26 (22.6min) fps
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
25.8 (21.7min) fps -1%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
21.7 (18.8min) fps -17%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
20.6 (17.9min) fps -21%
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
20.4 (13.8min) fps -22%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
12.8 (10.9min) fps -51%
Baldur's Gate 3
1280x720 Low Preset
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
60.8 (21.6min, 28.1P0.1, 35.6P1) fps +6%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
57.6 (31.7min, 33.6P0.1, 37.9P1) fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
50.2 (27.7min, 29.7P0.1, 32.6P1) fps -13%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
45 (14.9min, 19.4P0.1, 29P1) fps -22%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
26.2 (4.4min, 7.02P0.1, 18.4P1) fps -55%
1920x1080 High Preset
Geekom GT1 Mega
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
25.4 (13.9min, 14.3P0.1, 16.3P1) fps
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
24.5 (17.7min, 17.7P0.1, 19.8P1) fps -4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
22.4 (14min, 14.2P0.1, 15.3P1) fps -12%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
19.5 (9.2min, 10.4P0.1, 12.7P1) fps -23%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
11.7 (3.43min, 3.51P0.1, 3.99P1) fps -54%
F1 24
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom GT1 Mega
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
84.3 (70min, 66P1) fps
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
83.4 (28min, 33P1) fps -1%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
66.2 (56min, 54P1) fps -21%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
64.3 (55min, 53P1) fps -24%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
40.4 (34min, 33P1) fps -52%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom GT1 Mega
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
54.8 (43min, 45P1) fps
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
51.3 (23min, 15P1) fps -6%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
43.4 (34min, 35P1) fps -21%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
41.7 (34min, 34P1) fps -24%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
25.6 (22min, 21P1) fps -53%

FPS-Diagramm - 30 Min. Cyberpunk 2077 1.920 x 1.080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)

05101520Tooltip
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core: Ø22.1 (18.6-24)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M: Ø19.2 (17.9-20.3)
Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core: Ø18.5 (12.6-20.7)
Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø11.1 (5.97-12.3)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 165.2 151.8 43.5 16.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 110.5 62.8 87.8 45.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 79.2 41 28.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 66.4 52.1 42.3
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 39.3 30.3 25.4 25.2
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 38 31.4 26 23.3
F1 24 (2024) 84.3 73.8 54.8

使用 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 检查 Geekom GT1 Mega 性能

GPU-Z
GPU-Z

Geekom GT1 Mega 凭借其连接性,可通过 USB4 使用外置图形解决方案。重要的一点是带宽限制,这意味着通过 USB4 连接,外置显卡只能以 PCIe 3.0 x4 的速度工作。

英伟达GeForce RTX 4090我们进行了一些基准测试,以显示目前最快的消费级显卡的性能提升。

原则上,与 iGPU 相比,3D 性能可以明显提高。相比之下,与 Geekom GT1 Mega 的组合所带来的性能略高于来自 卡达斯.

不过,与 Minisforum MS-A1 相比,我们的测试样品不得不承认失败。与 OCuLink 接口相比,USB4 接口在技术上的劣势显而易见。OCuLink 接口提供 PCIe 4.0 x4 速度,相当于带宽的两倍。

Performance Rating - Percent
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
98.7 pt
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-14600K
96.9 pt
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
88.1 pt
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
78.6 pt
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
75 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-14600K
110994 Points +734%
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
104516 Points +685%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
98454 Points +640%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
64648 Points +386%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
62498 Points +370%

13309 Points
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-14600K
37769 Points +946%
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
37161 Points +929%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
34984 Points +869%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
28844 Points +699%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
23140 Points +541%

3610 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-14600K
86031 Points +886%
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
78579 Points +801%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
76191 Points +773%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
53367 Points +512%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
40417 Points +363%

8726 Points
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-14600K
25342 Points +1150%
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
24915 Points +1129%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
23565 Points +1062%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
21506 Points +960%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17047 Points +741%

2028 Points
Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
63603 Points +411%
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-14600K
49203 Points +295%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
35453 Points +185%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
33318 Points +168%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
28104 Points +126%

12451 Points
1920x1080 1080p High
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
50230 Points +1172%
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-14600K
45162 Points +1044%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
32728 Points +729%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
30115 Points +663%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
26890 Points +581%

3948 Points
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-14600K
21954 Points +936%
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
21586 Points +919%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
20934 Points +888%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
19915 Points +840%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19877 Points +838%

2119 Points
3840x2160 4k Optimized
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-14600K
33700 Points
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
33095 Points
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
30190 Points
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
27686 Points
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
25802 Points
7680x4320 8k Optimized
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-14600K
12791 Points
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
12498 Points
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
12251 Points
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
12132 Points
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12050 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
324 fps +1512%
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-14600K
283.4 fps +1310%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
216.1 fps +975%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
208.7 fps +938%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
187.1 fps +831%

20.1 fps
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
331.8 fps +1415%
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-14600K
303.2 fps +1284%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
231.7 fps +958%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
224.4 fps +925%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
200.5 fps +816%

21.9 fps
Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
472.4 fps +1198%
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-14600K
456.3 fps +1154%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
441.5 fps +1113%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
386.5 fps +962%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
372.8 fps +924%

36.4 fps
Extreme Preset DX11
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
473.9 fps +1164%
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-14600K
473 fps +1161%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
422.3 fps +1026%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
344.6 fps +819%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
343 fps +815%

37.5 fps
ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-14600K
92397 Points +1060%
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
92222 Points +1058%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
90882 Points +1041%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
86314 Points +984%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
83349 Points +947%

7963 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-14600K
10797 Points +2095%
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
10756 Points +2086%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
10664 Points +2067%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10373 Points +2008%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
9972 Points +1927%

492 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
6948 Points +1327%
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-14600K
6920 Points +1321%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
6907 Points +1318%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6771 Points +1290%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
6566 Points +1248%

487 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-14600K
17355 Points +751%
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
17307 Points +749%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
17088 Points +738%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16044 Points +687%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
15583 Points +664%

2039 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-14600K
22992 Points +1252%
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
22843 Points +1243%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
22633 Points +1231%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
21302 Points +1152%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
20574 Points +1110%

1701 Points
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
34367 Points +959%
Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-14600K
34333 Points +958%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
33589 Points +935%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
31824 Points +881%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
30654 Points +845%

3244 Points
Performance Rating - Percent
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
100 pt
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
75.5 pt
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
39.9 pt
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32.4 pt
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off)
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
256 (183.7min - 319max) fps +341%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
187.3 (143.6min - 225max) fps +223%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
88.9 (67.9min - 123.3max) fps +53%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
79.7 (62.5min - 101.2max) fps +37%

58 (49.1min - 71.8max) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
252 (174.7min - 318max) fps +703%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
184.9 (141min - 225max) fps +489%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
87.8 (65.1min - 123max) fps +180%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
77.5 (58.3min - 109.1max) fps +147%

31.4 (27.8min - 35.6max) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
204 (126.1min - 264max) fps +776%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
161.8 (107min - 205max) fps +594%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
75 (50.3min - 110.2max) fps +222%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68.8 (46.7min - 98.6max) fps +195%

23.3 (20.1min - 28.1max) fps
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Low Preset
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
253 (30.2min, 76.7P0.1, 155.7P1 - 431max) fps +544%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
200 (109.4min, 129.1P0.1, 154.1P1 - 278max) fps +409%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
189.1 (95.1min, 108.7P0.1, 136.8P1 - 323max) fps +381%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
142.8 (70.4min, 75.8P0.1, 97.6P1 - 236max) fps +263%

39.3 (24.3min, 25.4P0.1, 28P1 - 90.7max) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
231 (52.4min, 123P0.1, 150.8P1 - 382max) fps +662%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
194.4 (102.5min, 120P0.1, 151.2P1 - 274max) fps +542%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
168.3 (71.8min, 94P0.1, 117.8P1 - 266max) fps +455%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
114 (35.5min, 44P0.1, 57.3P1 - 219max) fps +276%

30.3 (18.1min, 18.2P0.1, 20.2P1 - 85.2max) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
212 (16.9min, 120.1P0.1, 151.8P1 - 372max) fps +741%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
190.9 (107.5min, 129.1P0.1, 148.8P1 - 259max) fps +658%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
151.8 (67.2min, 82P0.1, 101.9P1 - 254max) fps +502%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
109.2 (29.8min, 38.6P0.1, 55.9P1 - 199max) fps +333%

25.2 (11.9min, 13P0.1, 16.6P1 - 75.3max) fps
F1 24
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
405 (297min, 246P1 - 476max) fps +380%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
269 (203min, 181P1 - 313max) fps +219%

84.3 (70min, 66P1 - 97max) fps
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
78.1 (43min, 45P1 - 98max) fps -7%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
74.6 (42min, 44P1 - 94max) fps -12%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
421 (328min, 262P1 - 470max) fps +470%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
285 (216min, 190P1 - 313max) fps +286%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
74.4 (42min, 44P1 - 86max) fps +1%

73.8 (61min, 59P1 - 88max) fps
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
72.1 (41min, 43P1 - 85max) fps -2%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
401 (305min, 241P1 - 449max) fps +632%
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
267 (203min, 176P1 - 297max) fps +387%
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
61.7 (35min, 37P1 - 75max) fps +13%
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60.1 (35min, 36P1 - 74max) fps +10%

54.8 (43min, 45P1 - 64max) fps
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
205 (90min, 114P1 - 235max) fps
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink)
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
154.4 (74min, 88P1 - 171max) fps
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
43.9 (24min, 26P1 - 52max) fps
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
41.7 (23min, 24P1 - 48max) fps
Geekom GT1 Mega, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Ultra 9 185H
Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) ,
Ultra 9 185H
Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) ,
Ultra 7 155H
Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) ,
Ryzen 7 8700G
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
Ryzen 5 9600X
Intel Core i5-14600K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
i5-14600K
Average of class Mini PC
 
SPECviewperf 2020
775%
786%
1064%
1037%
1398%
124%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)
7.07
42.1
495%
42.3
498%
43.2
511%
43.5
515%
40.2
469%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)
5
92.8
1756%
95.3
1806%
141
2720%
95.6
1812%
229
4480%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)
19.8
91.1
360%
83.8
323%
128
546%
143
622%
139
602%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)
11.7
77.3
561%
75.7
547%
85.2
628%
94.2
705%
94.3
706%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
15.5
158
919%
160
932%
204
1216%
231
1390%
235
1416%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)
5.68
31.9
462%
33
481%
40.3
610%
48.1
747%
46.3
715%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)
38.8
378
874%
393
913%
512
1220%
609
1470%
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 182.3 156.9 153.6 143 136
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 209 196.8 164.3 156.8 119.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 143.6 134.1 101.8 87.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 189.1 168.3 152.7 151.8 136.9 96.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 88.8 87.8 79.3 75 74.3 53.1
F1 24 (2024) 78.1 74.4 61.7 43.9 43.2 42

排放:声音太大,不方便用户使用

噪音排放

虽然 Geekom 为 GT1 Mega 设计了更大的尺寸,并因此配备了更大的散热装置,但该系统只能在空闲模式下安静工作。如果你对它有什么要求,风扇就会转动起来,产生不可忽视的噪音。

相比之下,我们可以看到与 Geekom AX8 Pro 类似的情况,后者的体积要小得多。通过 UH125 Pro,Minisforum 向我们展示了如何做得更好,如果我们仅限于负载下的声压级。

有鉴于此,我们建议在 BIOS 中激活静音模式,以在一定程度上降低负载时的音量。总的来说,风扇控制区似乎还很不成熟。第一步当然是提供更多的风扇转速调节选项。此外,开发一个可在 Windows 中更改风扇速度的小工具也很有意义。

Noise Level

Idle
25.4 / 27.2 / 27.5 dB(A)
Load
50.9 / 50.9 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.8 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.138.635.837.434.13734.12535.434.332.936.236.331.135.43139.738.139.640.338.64039.74026.629.625.426.423.223.926.650293428.630.426.225.3296327.832.533.93227.923.227.88024.525.922.424.622.722.724.510024.924.921.623.221.92124.912524.723.815.915.914.813.424.716022.72314.114.111.99.322.720025.525.214.715.614.210.525.525027.627.412.812.912.79.627.631526.826.911.11313.39.226.840026.926.91011.511.69.626.950030.430.310.813.412.38.830.463031.230.810.513.412.88.931.280034.734.811.314.514.19.334.7100039.138.512.716.816.69.939.1125040.940.612.917.51710.640.9160040.440.511.916.215.711.240.4200042.642.512.616.115.811.842.6250040.340.513.115.215.112.540.3315037.938.213.415.615.213.437.9400043.143.113.815.414.91443.150003736.914.314.414.214.237630029.429.614.614.814.814.529.4800029.73014.814.914.914.829.71000024.525.514.914.915.114.624.51250017.819.414.714.714.814.417.8160001617.514.314.314.31416SPL50.950.925.427.627.224.850.9N6.76.70.60.90.80.56.7median 29.7median 30median 13.4median 14.9median 14.8median 11.8median 29.7Delta6.57.21.70.90.82.46.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseGeekom GT1 Mega
Geekom GT1 Mega
Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
Geekom AX8 Pro
R9 8945H, Radeon 780M
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
Geekom GT13 Pro
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Acemagic F2A
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
Noise
3%
6%
-6%
2%
4%
off / environment *
24.8
24.9
-0%
24
3%
24.8
-0%
24.3
2%
24.9
-0%
Idle Minimum *
25.4
24.9
2%
26
-2%
35
-38%
27.9
-10%
25.4
-0%
Idle Average *
27.2
24.9
8%
26.2
4%
35
-29%
27.9
-3%
25.7
6%
Idle Maximum *
27.5
24.9
9%
26.2
5%
35
-27%
28
-2%
25.7
7%
Load Average *
50.9
50.1
2%
42.4
17%
42.2
17%
43.8
14%
47.8
6%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
50.8
50
2%
47.7
6%
40.8
20%
45.4
11%
Load Maximum *
50.9
50.2
1%
47.8
6%
43.9
14%
48.5
5%
49
4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
45.23

* ... smaller is better

温度

闲置时,Geekom GT1 Mega 的外壳仅有轻微发热。由于采用了快速旋转的风扇,产生的热量会立即从外壳散出,因此即使在负载情况下,表面温度也很低。

英特尔 英特尔酷睿至尊 9 185H在压力测试中并未达到 100 °C。平均温度在非关键范围内。只有当 SoC 使用 PL2 时,温度才会达到最高值。

冷却系统可以在较长时间内很好地耗散 45 W 的功率。遗憾的是,由于 GT1 Mega 的设计与 Geekom 以前的设备相比较大,因此并无太大优势。

压力测试 Prime95,单人
压力测试 Prime95,单人
FurMark 压力测试,独奏
FurMark 压力测试,独奏
Prime95 和 FurMark 压力测试
Prime95 和 FurMark 压力测试
Geekom GT1 Mega 压力测试(顶面)
Geekom GT1 Mega 压力测试(顶面)
Geekom GT1 Mega 压力测试(底部)
Geekom GT1 Mega 压力测试(底部)
Geekom GT1 Mega 压力测试(背面)
Geekom GT1 Mega 压力测试(背面)
压力测试期间的供电装置
压力测试期间的供电装置
Max. Load
 31.2 °C32.9 °C32.9 °C 
 28.9 °C30.7 °C30.1 °C 
 29.4 °C29.6 °C29.6 °C 
Maximum: 32.9 °C
Average: 30.6 °C
34.3 °C33.6 °C32.2 °C
33 °C36.5 °C30.3 °C
31.6 °C28.8 °C28.8 °C
Maximum: 36.5 °C
Average: 32.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  44.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Mini PC.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.3 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.

电源管理:与华硕 NUC 14 Pro 相当

在功耗方面,Geekom GT1 Mega 是一款经济实惠的微型电脑,我们的测量结果也证明了这一点。即使在空闲时,该设备也非常省电。只有 华硕 NUC 14 Pro才能跟上 Geekom GT1 Mega 的脚步,达到同样出色的数值。

在负载情况下,我们的测试样本仍然相对经济,平均功耗为 65.8 瓦,但峰值功耗可能高达 105 瓦。不过,就效率而言,它只能排在第二位。在这方面, Geekom AX8 Pro配备 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS整体表现更好。

我们曾在 Geekom 的多款迷你 PC 中见过 Geekom GT1 Mega 配备的 120 W 电源装置。最大性能足够,并且有足够的空间选配第二台数据存储设备。

Geekom GT1 Mega 配有电源装置(19 V;6.32 A)
Geekom GT1 Mega 配有电源装置(19 V;6.32 A)
供电装置(19 伏;6.32 安)
供电装置(19 伏;6.32 安)
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 1.35 / 5.4 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.1 / 6.6 / 11.3 Watt
Load midlight 65.8 / 104.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Geekom GT1 Mega
Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
Geekom AX8 Pro
R9 8945H, Radeon 780M
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
Geekom GT13 Pro
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Acemagic F2A
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
 
Average of class Mini PC
 
Power Consumption
-74%
-3%
-47%
-34%
-39%
-7%
-44%
Idle Minimum *
4.1
14
-241%
5.1
-24%
11.9
-190%
7.9
-93%
9.1
-122%
5.41 ?(1.8 - 10.3, n=37)
-32%
Idle Average *
6.6
15.9
-141%
6.4
3%
14.6
-121%
10.3
-56%
10.3
-56%
8.64 ?(4.2 - 16, n=37)
-31%
Idle Maximum *
11.3
19.5
-73%
14.7
-30%
15.4
-36%
22.3
-97%
14.4
-27%
12.1 ?(4.5 - 49, n=37)
-7%
Load Average *
65.8
76.4
-16%
55.5
16%
48.3
27%
57.44
13%
54.9
17%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
69.4
54.3
22%
59.1
15%
52.7
24%
55.9
19%
Load Maximum *
104.8
99.1
5%
103.3
1%
89.8
14%
93.4
11%
110.4
-5%

* ... smaller is better

Power efficiency

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M
94.7 pt
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
84 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
81.1 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
81 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
80.5 pt
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
78.7 pt
Power Consumption
Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M
219 Points per Watt +12%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
210 Points per Watt +8%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
194.8 Points per Watt
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
183.7 Points per Watt -6%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
181.1 Points per Watt -7%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
163.7 Points per Watt -16%
Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
69.4 Points per Watt +22%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M
58.3 Points per Watt +3%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
57.1 Points per Watt +1%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
56.7 Points per Watt
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
54.3 Points per Watt -4%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
54.2 Points per Watt -4%
Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor)
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M
35.9 Points per Watt +23%
Geekom GT1 Mega
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
29.2 Points per Watt
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
28 Points per Watt -4%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
26.6 Points per Watt -9%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
24.8 Points per Watt -15%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
24 Points per Watt -18%

Power consumption: External monitor

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø6.65 (4.54-11.3)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø15.9 (14.3-19.4)
Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø6.48 (4.52-12)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø75.4 (64.2-104.8)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø89.4 (87.8-94.6)
Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø90.8 (85.1-98.5)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø69.4 (66.7-76.7)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø54.3 (43.7-67.1)
Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø59.1 (55.8-67.9)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø65.8 (59-72.8)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø76.5 (55.7-96.2)
Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø55.5 (51.2-61.4)

Power consumption: External monitor

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø75.6 (62.9-104.6)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø75.9 (72.6-96)
Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø90.6 (79.2-103.3)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø95.8 (95-96.5)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø70.3 (63.2-83)
Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø89.2 (88-90.9)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31.3 (15.7-81.3)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31 (25.6-51.4)
Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø24.8 (20.8-58)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø95.5 (94-96.6)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø70.9 (66.8-89.8)
Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø88.7 (86.9-91.6)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø58.2 (56.2-74.2)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø85.7 (73.1-99.9)
Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø56.9 (53.6-63.3)

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Geekom GT1 Mega 是一款功能强大、应用广泛的微型电脑。得益于先进的硬件和丰富的连接功能,这款迷你电脑面向未来。

基于英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 185H 和 32 GB 内存,GT1 Mega 在测试中为办公应用提供了出色的性能,也能胜任耗电的多媒体任务。唯一的缺点是有时散热声音较大,即使在一般负载下也能清楚听到。

Geekom GT1 Mega - 11/06/2024 v8
Sebastian Bade

Chassis
87 / 98 → 89%
Connectivity
74 / 81 → 91%
Weight
80%
Games Performance
48 / 80 → 60%
Application Performance
84 / 92 → 91%
Workstation
34%
AI Performance
84%
Temperature
93%
Noise
73%
Average
54%
79%
Mini PC - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
63.4%
Repairability
30%
Software Updates
39%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 30.4%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Geekom GT1 Mega 评测:Geekom 的首款 AI 迷你 PC 在各方面都不尽如人意
Sebastian Bade, 2024-11-14 (Update: 2024-11-14)