华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 迷你 PC 评测--仅重 622 克的潜在台式机杀手
功能多样，性能卓越。
华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 承诺在小巧的外形下提供令人印象深刻的性能，配备最新的处理器和强大的动力。但它在日常使用中的表现如何呢？在这篇评测中，我们将对 NUC 14 Pro+ 进行测试，看看它是否兑现了自己的承诺，能否真正成为台式机的有效替代品。Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论 - 高性能是有代价的
华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 配备 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H，作为一款紧凑型迷你 PC，它在许多方面都非常突出。它采用新一代处理器，性能卓越，可胜任从多任务处理到图像和视频编辑等创意应用等要求苛刻的任务。从外观上看，华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 采用了时尚的银白色配色，看起来比许多其他迷你 PC 都要小巧。一个特别令人印象深刻的特点是其广泛的连接选项，包括两个面向未来的 Thunderbolt 4 端口。底部免工具拆卸是一个巧妙的设计选择，可以快速方便地升级固态硬盘或内存。
它的缺点是在中高负载时噪音较大，根据不同的使用场景会有明显的噪音。考虑到购买价格，直接开箱即可进行更好的风扇曲线调节是合理的。毕竟，BIOS 提供的各种设置可以帮助改善这一问题。尽管如此，NUC 14 Pro+ 仍然是寻找功能强大、节省空间的个人电脑的理想选择，无论是日常任务、多媒体还是创意应用。
Pros
+ 坚固耐用的优质表壳
+ 无可挑剔的工艺
+ 双 Thunderbolt 4 端口
+ 英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 185H 性能无与伦比
+ 强大的集成 GPU
+ 充足的 32 GB 内存
+ 持续稳定的固态硬盘性能
+ 丰富的 BIOS 配置选项
+ 36 个月保修
Cons
- 冷却装置在极端负荷下仍能高效运行
- 部分和全负荷时噪音明显
- 缺少 OCuLink 接口
- 价格昂贵
价格和供应情况
亚马逊正在销售我们测试过的华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 型号，售价 1050 美元。亚马逊上还有起价为 882 美元的裸机。如果想买更实惠的产品，可以考虑配备英特尔酷睿5 125H处理器的华硕NUC 14 Pro+，售价约为765美元起，配备512 GB固态硬盘和16 GB内存。
$1,000.89
ASUS NUC 14 Pro+ Full System Mini PC with Intel 14th Gen Core Ultra 9 185H, 32GB DDR5 RAM, 1TB PCIe G4x4 NVMe SSD, Thunderbolt 4, Win 11 Home, Silver Aluminum Chassis, VESA Mount Included
- $599.99ASUS NUC 14 Pro Slim Barebone with Intel 14th Gen Core Ultra 7 155H (NPU Support), Up to 96GB DDR5 RAM, Dual Storage Design, Thunderbolt 4, Wi-Fi 6E & Bluetooth 5.3, with VESA Mount
- $1,099.00ASUS NUC 14 Pro AI Mini Pc, Ultra 7 155H (16C/22T, Up to 4.8GHz) Mini Desktop, 32GB DDR5 RAM 1TB PCIe 4 SSD Mini Computer, Intel Arc Gpu/AI GC/AI Boost/AI Ready/Type C 3.2/8K/HDR/My ASUS/BT5.3/WiFi 6E
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Geizhals | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 75.3%  | Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | 622 g | 41 mm | x | |
2. 80.8%  | Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Listenpreis 649 US-Dollar | 653 g | 60 mm | x |
3. 78.8%  | Geekom GT1 Mega Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Listenpreis 1149 EUR Geizhals Suche | 693 g | 46.9 mm | x |
4. 78.4%  | Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Listenpreis 999 EUR | 548 g | 37 mm | x |
5. 87.5% v7 (old)  | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | 863 g | 48.6 mm | x | |
6. 83.4% v7 (old)  | Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Listenpreis 1199 EUR | 768 g | 57 mm | x |
从外观上看，华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 明显有别于英特尔最初推出的 NUC 系列（下一代计算单元）。这款小能手的体积稍大，但仍然非常紧凑，在本次评测中，我们将重点介绍其最佳配置，包括 英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 185H.尽管 1050 美元的价格偏高，但该系统与 32 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘一起，可以直接投入使用。如果你选择为设备配备自己的内存和固态硬盘，价格会更低。此外，华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 可配备 英特尔酷睿 5 125H或 英特尔酷睿 7 155H作为替代选择。这些性能稍差的机型速度仍然足以胜任日常任务。
在竞争激烈的迷你 PC 市场，华硕面临着来自远东品牌的强劲竞争。Minisforum、Geekom 和 Aoostar 等公司以更具竞争力的价格提供类似的设备。让我们仔细看看华硕与这些对手的差距有多大。
规格
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H 16 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 115 W PL2 / Short Burst, 115 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Core: 2350 MHz
Memory
32 GB
, 5600 MT/s, max 96 GB
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU, 1024 GB
, 875 GB free
Weight
622 g, Power Supply: 303 g
Price
1250 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
外壳 - 金属和塑料的牢固结合
从外观上看，华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 与我们熟悉的华硕现在销售的 NUC 迷你 PC 有明显区别。该公司选择了铝和塑料相结合的材料。底部（也是维护挡板）由塑料制成，而顶部则由铝制成。总体而言，这款小型 PC 的加工工艺完美无瑕。无论从外观还是战术上看，华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 都没有什么值得批评的地方。在占地面积方面，华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 比某些竞争对手略微多占一些空间。不过，其占地面积为 14.4 x 11.2 厘米，尺寸仍然合理，可以舒适地摆放在大多数办公桌上。此外，通过附带的 VESA 支架，华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 可以直接连接到显示器上。
连接性 - 包括所有必需品
这款迷你电脑提供了丰富的外部端口选择，但在总连接数方面与 Geekom GT1 Mega 相比仍有差距。华硕一共提供了 7 个 USB 端口，包括 4 个标准 A 型插座和 3 个 C 型端口。值得注意的是，其中两个 USB-C 端口支持雷电 4（Thunderbolt 4），这大大扩展了迷你 PC 连接兼容配件的潜力。此外，NUC 14 Pro+ 还配备了两个 HDMI 端口和一个 2.5G 网络连接。总的来说，连接的分布是经过深思熟虑的，为各种使用情况提供了通用性和可访问性的良好平衡。
| Connectivity - USB 3.x / USB4 / TB - AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Khadas Mind 2 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (1611 - 3245, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
交流
在测试过程中，华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 随附的英特尔 Wi-Fi 6E AX211 模块提供了良好的效果。不过，其性能略逊于竞争对手。为获得最佳性能，建议主要使用 6 GHz 频段进行无线通信。WLAN 测试使用华硕 ROG Capture GT AXE11000 路由器进行。
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1223 (1160-1303)
Geekom GT1 Mega Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1242 (1110-1348)
Geekom AX8 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1800 (1737-1904)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1321-1486)
Geekom GT1 Mega Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1126 (666-1346)
Geekom AX8 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1656 (1619-1670)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø950 (926-965)
Geekom GT1 Mega Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø887 (825-926)
Geekom AX8 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø978 (962-989)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø707 (666-737)
Geekom GT1 Mega Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø741 (690-797)
Geekom AX8 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø966 (921-1008)
配件
华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 随附一个 150 瓦的电源、一个 VESA 支架和所需的组件。没有提供键盘或鼠标等其他外设。
维护
华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 还有裸机版本，这意味着你需要自己安装内存和固态硬盘。安装非常简单，因为无需任何工具即可拆下底部。我们的测试样品已经安装了一个固态硬盘和两个 SO-DIMM 模块。虽然必须考虑到 42 毫米的总长度，但仍有空间添加另一块固态硬盘。
可持续性
与传统台式机相比，华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 是一款体积小巧、节能效果显著的 PC。它被装在一个大小合适的小盒子里。迷你 PC 本身主要由金属和塑料制成，但不清楚其构造中是否使用了特殊的可回收材料。三年保修期是一个值得注意的特点，我们对此表示赞赏。
性能 - Intel Core Ultra 9 185H 无任何限制
英特尔 英特尔酷睿超 9 185H是英特尔目前流星湖 H 系列中的旗舰机型。其混合设计为日常任务提供了强大的性能，同时在不需要全功率时保持节能。华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 配备了 英特尔酷睿 7 155H的华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 具有相同数量的内核，价格略低。配备英特尔酷睿 5 125H 处理器的华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 定位较低。 英特尔酷睿5 125HSoC 的华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 也采用了混合设计，并包含一个 NPU。对于那些注重性价比的用户来说，这款机型是一个极佳的选择。
测试条件
我们使用 "平衡 "能源配置文件进行了所有性能测试，并没有改变 SoC 的性能，而是根据 BIOS 设置（"平衡"）将其保留在默认状态。广泛的 BIOS 配置非常出色。与 Geekom、Minisforum 或 Acemagic 等品牌的微型电脑相比，华硕在这方面显然更胜一筹。除了调整 CPU 功耗外，用户甚至可以根据需要停用个别 USB 端口。
处理器
华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 的顶级型号采用了 英特尔酷睿 9 185H处理器，具有 16 个内核和 22 个线程，可提供出色的多线程性能。华硕没有限制最大功耗，这意味着理论上最高可达到 115 瓦。在压力测试中，我们观察到该系统可以承受高达 100 瓦的短时功耗。虽然华硕没有充分利用这方面的潜力，但与其他微型 PC 相比，华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 的 SoC 实现了更高的功耗。不过，竞争机型之间的性能差异很小，因此没有明显的区别。
处理器 英特尔酷睿 5 125H也被纳入性能对比。与英特尔酷睿至尊 9 185H 相比，英特尔酷睿至尊 5 125H 大约要慢 10%到 15%。
有关更多比较和详细基准测试，请参阅我们的 CPU 比较表。
Performance Rating | Cinebench 2024 | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | Blender | wPrime 2.10 | X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 | WinRAR | TrueCrypt | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 5.0 | Geekbench 4.4 | 3DMark 11 | 7-Zip 18.03 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | R Benchmark 2.5 | LibreOffice | WebXPRT 3 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | 3DMark | Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M | Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M | Affinity Photo 2
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (12858 - 13281, n=2) | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (78788 - 78817, n=2) | |
| Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (228 - 364, n=6) | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| WinRAR - Result | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (5594 - 13080, n=4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (12766 - 17992, n=8) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (9.7 - 16.7, n=6) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (0.4898 - 0.53, n=6) | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (42.7 - 70.9, n=6) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (245 - 263, n=6) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (560 - 595, n=6) | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (7.4 - 7.74, n=4) | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (16.4 - 17, n=4) | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Multi CPU) | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (594 - 615, n=2) | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Average of class Mini PC | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Average of class Mini PC (646 - 51004, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Average of class Mini PC (3857 - 214250, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Average of class Mini PC (260 - 9399, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Average of class Mini PC (8172 - 184747, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Average of class Mini PC (408 - 29064, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Average of class Mini PC (1987 - 113499, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Average of class Mini PC (3691 - 325960, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Average of class Mini PC (74.9 - 2039, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Average of class Mini PC (350 - 26952, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Average of class Mini PC (4408 - 50500, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Cinebench R15 多连续测试
华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 的高性能极限在 Cinebench R15 耐用性测试开始时最为明显。在第二次运行过程中，性能略有下降，但这种下降趋于稳定，最终该设备以 2588 分的平均分完成了负载测试。不过，与 Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti和 Acemagic F2A，这意味着我们的测试样品在此次比较中获得了第三名。
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2588 (2519.69-2910.57)
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2530 (2503.13-2552.81)
Geekom GT1 Mega Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2442 (2286.63-2795.05)
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H: Ø2223 (2100.4-2438.43)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2784 (2721.64-2831.86)
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2759 (2690.7-2800.92)
系统性能
华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 清楚地表明，虽然强劲的 CPU 基准测试结果令人印象深刻，但并不总能在系统测试中转化为同样高的性能。与速度更快的竞争对手相比，华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 的差距相对较小，这与我们在测试期间的主观印象一致。采用 英特尔酷睿 9 185H华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 的卓越性能在日常使用中仍未得到充分发挥。
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Average of class Mini PC (6481 - 89287, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (6914 - 99171, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Average of class Mini PC (6862 - 98583, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
* ... smaller is better
NPU 性能
NPU（神经处理单元）是英特尔酷睿至尊 9 185H 的一项关键功能，它使 SoC 能够以超凡的效率处理人工智能任务。处理器不封顶的功耗让 NPU 发挥出最佳性能。为了进行性能比较，我们使用了 UL Procyon AI 接口基准测试。然而，Geekom GT1 Mega 再次 Geekom GT1 Mega在这方面仍然是强有力的竞争对手。
| UL Procyon for Windows / Overall Score Integer NPU | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Khadas Mind 2 | |
| Minisforum UH125 Pro | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| UL Procyon for Windows / Overall Score Integer GPU | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Khadas Mind 2 | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Minisforum UH125 Pro | |
DPC 延迟
华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 的 DPC 延迟结果优于其他迷你 PC。不过，它仍然不能完全令人信服。在使用 Edge 浏览器浏览互联网时，延迟已经明显增加，不过在播放 4K 测试视频时延迟并没有恶化。只有在使用 Prime 95 进行短期压力测试时，延迟才会再次上升。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
华硕为 NUC 14 Pro+ 配备了 1 TB 三星固态硬盘，充分利用 PCIe 4.0 x4 的 M.2 接口来实现最佳性能。这确保了出色的性能，可与 Geekom AX8 中使用的宏碁 N7000 相媲美。 Geekom AX8.除了预装的 80 毫米固态硬盘，还有一个额外的 42 毫米固态硬盘插槽。两个固态硬盘都由位于底座上的装置主动冷却。三星固态硬盘在压力测试中表现良好，性能保持稳定，没有明显下降。在与宏碁 N7000 的对比中，两者的性能仍然不相上下。
有关进一步的比较和基准测试，请参阅我们的 比较表.
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
Sequential Read:
3556 MB/s
Sequential Write:
2949 MB/s
512K Read:
2292 MB/s
512K Write:
2158 MB/s
4K Read:
66.49 MB/s
4K Write:
118.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
379.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
325.5 MB/s
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Average of class Mini PC | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance:/Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6962 (5660.63-7000.13)
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5121 (4152.57-5218.34)
Geekom GT1 Mega Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8 ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5055 (4738.1-5067.7)
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6996 (5972.7-7027.76)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4683 (3872.18-4767.25)
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1320 (771.89-3141.95)
图形卡
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (13339 - 32642, n=38) | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 | Unigine Valley 1.0 | Unigine Superposition | ComputeMark v2.1 | LuxMark v2.0 64Bit | Affinity Photo 2
| Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Unigine Superposition | |
| 1280x720 720p Low | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| 1920x1080 1080p High | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 9 185H | Aoostar GEM12, AMD Radeon 780M R7 8845HS | Geekom GT1 Mega, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 9 185H | Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Radeon 780M R9 8945H | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 9 185H | Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 7 155H | Average of class Mini PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPECviewperf 2020 | 244% | 4% | 237% | -0% | -9% | 139% | |
| 3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 6.99 | 11.2 60% | 7.07 1% | 12.8 83% | 4.23 -39% | 5.05 -28% | 7.85 ? 12% |
| 3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 4.94 | 19.9 303% | 5 1% | 13.3 169% | 6.03 22% | 4.61 -7% | 11.3 ? 129% |
| 3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 18.9 | 33.4 77% | 19.8 5% | 35.3 87% | 18.5 -2% | 17.9 -5% | 30.7 ? 62% |
| 3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 11.2 | 23.2 107% | 11.7 4% | 25.1 124% | 11.1 -1% | 10 -11% | 18.6 ? 66% |
| 3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 14.8 | 20.4 38% | 15.5 5% | 21.1 43% | 14.9 1% | 12.9 -13% | 22.5 ? 52% |
| 3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 5.37 | 64.1 1094% | 5.68 6% | 65.7 1123% | 6.24 16% | 5.7 6% | 37.2 ? 593% |
| 3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 37.2 | 47.7 28% | 38.8 4% | 49.6 33% | 37.7 1% | 35.4 -5% | 58.9 ? 58% |
| 3DMark 05 Standard | 50932 points | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 36407 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 42630 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13441 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 148268 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36112 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7757 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 4006 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3881 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 714 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 3026 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
与配备专用显卡的设备相比，华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 的游戏性能较差。不过，如果你愿意降低显卡设置，还是可以玩游戏的。即使降低细节，这款迷你 PC 也能运行多款游戏。与竞争对手相比 Geekom GT1 Mega的性能要优于我们的测试样品，但配备 AMD Radeon 780M 可以提升性能。要大幅提升游戏性能，外置显卡将是最有效的解决方案。
有关各种显卡 iGPU 性能的详细比较，请参阅我们的 GPU 游戏列表.
| GTA V | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (163.6 - 186.7, n=14) | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (106 - 177.3, n=26) | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (67.2 - 103.1, n=5) | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (42.4 - 75, n=6) | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 | |
| 1280x720 Low Preset | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (49.8 - 83.5, n=7) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Aoostar GEM12 | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| F1 24 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
FPS chart - 30 min Cyberpunk 2077 1920 x 1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core: Ø20.3 (18.2-21.9)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M: Ø21.7 (20.1-23.3)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core: Ø22.1 (18.6-24)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M: Ø19.2 (17.9-20.3)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 162.9 | 154.1 | 40.6 | 15.8 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 104.7 | 78 | 54.8 | 76 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 75.3 | 40.2 | 28.6 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 65.5 | 49.8 | 42.2 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 37.9 | 29.7 | 25.2 | 24.4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 34.7 | 28.9 | 24.1 | 22 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 71.8 | 64.7 | 48.4 |
使用 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 进行的华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 性能测试
华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 配备了两个 Thunderbolt 端口，支持外置显卡连接。不过，需要注意的是带宽限制，因为外置图形处理器只能通过 USB4 连接以 PCIe 3.0 x4 的速度运行。我们使用 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 进行了性能测试。测试性能，看看目前最快的消费级显卡能带来怎样的性能提升。
在测试过程中，3D 性能在某些情况下会有显著提升。合成基准测试和游戏基准测试都证明了潜在的性能提升。与在传统台式电脑中使用显卡相比，性能明显下降。作为参考，我们将这些结果与 AMD Ryzen 5 9600X 搭配 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 的结果进行了比较。将性能损失降到最低的潜在解决方案可能是 OCuLink 连接，但这仍然是一个罕见的选择。在 Minisforum MS-A1展示了这种设置所能达到的效果。
Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Unigine Superposition | Unigine Valley 1.0 | Unigine Heaven 4.0 | ComputeMark v2.1
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 3DMark | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Unigine Superposition | |
| 1280x720 720p Low | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p High | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 3840x2160 4k Optimized | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 7680x4320 8k Optimized | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
| Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Extreme Preset DX11 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| ComputeMark v2.1 | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Score | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
| 1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| F1 24 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Khadas Mind 2 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 167.9 | 154.7 | 150.5 | 140 | 135 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 195.5 | 184.4 | 158.2 | 150.6 | 118.7 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 92.4 | 91.9 | 77.1 | 67.5 | ||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 171.8 | 157.9 | 147.5 | 146.9 | 133.8 | 93.8 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 73.8 | 71.7 | 65.3 | 61.4 | 62.8 | 52.8 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 75.7 | 70.5 | 59.7 | 41.7 | 40.8 | 39.8 |
排放--一把双刃剑
系统噪音
华硕在 NUC 14 Pro+ 中使用了主动散热系统，风扇位于设备底部。不过，我们在 Cinebench R15 压力测试中发现，散热解决方案很快就达到了极限。噪音排放清楚地表明，单风扇必须努力工作才能在机箱内循环足够的新鲜空气。华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 的平均噪音水平为 45.7 dB(A)，非常明显。在压力测试中，我们录得的峰值为 47.4 dB(A)。在空闲模式下，设备运行安静，但风扇仍在继续转动。
风扇配置文件可在 BIOS 中调节。为了进行比较，我们在耳语模式和性能模式下对系统进行了测试。在耳语模式下，最大噪音水平降至约 43 dB(A)，更适合长期使用。另一方面，性能模式会导致噪音显著增加，声压级接近 58 dB(A)，我们不建议日常使用。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24.7 / 29.6 / 29.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 45.7 / 47.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.6 dB(A) | ||
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 10% | -2% | 1% | 1% | 3% | |
| off / environment * | 24.6 | 24.3 1% | 24.8 -1% | 24.9 -1% | 24.1 2% | 24.9 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.7 | 27.5 -11% | 25.4 -3% | 24.9 -1% | 29.8 -21% | 25.4 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 29.6 | 27.6 7% | 27.2 8% | 24.9 16% | 29.9 -1% | 25.7 13% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.8 | 27.6 7% | 27.5 8% | 24.9 16% | 30 -1% | 25.7 14% |
| Load Average * | 45.7 | 36 21% | 50.9 -11% | 50.1 -10% | 37.3 18% | 47.8 -5% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 47.7 | 35.4 26% | 50.8 -6% | 50 -5% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 47.4 | 38.2 19% | 50.9 -7% | 50.2 -6% | 43.5 8% | 49 -3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.4 | 40.2 | 45.23 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 的表面温度在空闲和负载条件下变化很大。金属表面有效地分散了热量，防止出现局部热点。在压力测试中 英特尔酷睿至尊 9 185H可轻松达到 212 °F。在连续负载情况下，SoC 的设计功耗高达 239 瓦，但这一峰值并未得到充分利用。在短期内，功耗峰值略高于 212 瓦，但在持续负载下，系统耗散功率通常只有 147 瓦左右。尽管如此，SoC 的工作温度始终保持在 212 华氏度以上，英特尔酷睿至尊 9 185H 处理器对此处理得很好。根据技术规格，该处理器的额定工作温度高达 230 °F。
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Mini PC.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the class Mini PC.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the class Mini PC.
能源管理
华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 本质上是一款经济实惠的微型电脑，在空闲模式和中等负载下性能最佳。由于处理器的峰值功率输出，短期功耗比其他迷你 PC 高出很多。我们的测试样本功耗略低于 145 瓦，是本次比较中的最高值。值得注意的是，达到这个值的时间很短。电源装置最高可提供 150 瓦的功率，对系统来说大小适中。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.78 / 1 Watt |
| Idle | 4.2 / 7.2 / 13 Watt |
| Load |
68.5 / 144.9 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Average of class Mini PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -21% | 10% | -60% | -24% | -25% | 4% | -34% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.2 | 8.2 -95% | 4.1 2% | 14 -233% | 8.2 -95% | 9.1 -117% | 5.41 ? -29% | 9.69 ? -131% |
| Idle Average * | 7.2 | 10 -39% | 6.6 8% | 15.9 -121% | 12.1 -68% | 10.3 -43% | 8.64 ? -20% | 11.9 ? -65% |
| Idle Maximum * | 13 | 14.6 -12% | 11.3 13% | 19.5 -50% | 14 -8% | 14.4 -11% | 12.1 ? 7% | 15.2 ? -17% |
| Load Average * | 68.5 | 73.9 -8% | 65.8 4% | 76.4 -12% | 53.1 22% | 54.9 20% | 54.2 ? 21% | 59 ? 14% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 74.1 | 79.9 -8% | 69.4 6% | 54.3 27% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 144.9 | 95.3 34% | 104.8 28% | 99.1 32% | 100.4 31% | 110.4 24% | 85 ? 41% | 100.5 ? 31% |
* ... smaller is better
Efficiency overview
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Power Consumption | |
| Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor) | |
| Geekom AX8 Pro | |
| Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
| Geekom GT1 Mega | |
| Acemagic F2A | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Power consumption with external monitor
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.26 (4.91-13.1)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø6.65 (4.54-11.3)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø15.9 (14.3-19.4)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø114.7 (100.9-144.9)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø75.4 (64.2-104.8)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø89.4 (87.8-94.6)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø74.1 (62.4-78.7)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø69.4 (66.7-76.7)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø54.3 (43.7-67.1)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø68.5 (60-97.6)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø65.8 (59-72.8)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø76.5 (55.7-96.2)
Power consumption with external monitor
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø104.2 (91.4-142.7)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø75.6 (62.9-104.6)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø75.9 (72.6-96)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø118.5 (109.4-137.5)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø95.8 (95-96.5)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø70.3 (63.2-83)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø35.3 (25.6-81.6)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31.3 (15.7-81.3)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31 (25.6-51.4)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø93.8 (87.6-109.2)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø95.5 (94-96.6)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø70.9 (66.8-89.8)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø56.6 (55.1-70.1)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø58.2 (56.2-74.2)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø85.7 (73.1-99.9)
笔记本检查评级
华硕 NUC 14 Pro+ 性能卓越，拥有尖端技术和广泛的连接选项。英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 185H 为办公应用提供了出色的性能，并能轻松处理耗电的多媒体任务。唯一的缺点是散热系统偶尔会发出很大的噪音，即使在中等负载的情况下也很明显。
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
- 11/14/2024 v8
Sebastian Bade
Mini PC - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
