Geekom AE7 评测:配备 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS、DDR5 内存、现代接口和一个问题的 NUC 迷你 PC
作为 Geekom A5Geekom AE7 采用了更先进的 SoC。其基础是 AMD Ryzen 7 7940HS还配备了非常强大的 AMD Radeon 780MiGPU。同时,Geekom AE7 仅提供我们测试的配置,即 32 GB DDR5 内存和 1 TB SSD。Geekom AE7 的售价为 740 欧元,并不便宜,也不便宜。我们现在就来看看它的出色性能是否能证明它的价格是合理的。
这款迷你电脑面临着来自自己公司的竞争。其他竞争对手也不甘示弱,Minisforum、Aoostar 和 Acemagic 也有功能强大的微型电脑,其中有些甚至便宜得多。我们在下表中总结了我们选择的竞争对手。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
78 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Geekom AE7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | 578 g | 49.2 mm | |
80.8 % | v8 | 06 / 2024 | Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 653 g | 60 mm | |
72.1 % | v8 | 06 / 2024 | Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 440 g | 37 mm | |
87.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | 863 g | 48.6 mm | |
84.9 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M | 432 g | 38 mm | |
83.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 768 g | 57 mm | |
82.3 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 600 g | 58 mm | |
81.2 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Geekom A5 R7 5800H, Vega 8 | 555 g | 49.2 mm |
注:我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。 此处.
Geekom AE7 的细节
案例 - 一切照旧
之后 Geekom A8以及 GT13 Pro最初采用时尚的铝合金外壳之后,Geekom 在 AE7 上又倒退回来,选择了老式的外壳设计。Geekom 的 IT11 和 IT12 在设计上与英特尔 NUC 型号几乎完全相同。Geekom A5 是第一款在这样的机箱中搭载 AMD APU 的产品,现在已被升级为 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS取代。
唯一与 Geekom AE7 相同的主要区别在于配色。该设备采用银色涂装。由于选材统一,因此没有颜色差异。从内部来看,塑料外壳仍然与坚固的金属外壳相得益彰。做工依然保持着极高的水准。所有部件都配合得天衣无缝,磨砂表面几乎看不到指纹。无论是 Geekom A8 还是 Geekom GT13,Geekom 都向我们展示了在材料选择方面提供更高品质设备的可能性。完全重新设计的外壳不仅能为布满灰尘的外观带来新鲜空气,还能提供更有效的散热空间。
顺便提一下,与许多其他微型 PC 一样,Geekom AE7 也可以使用附带的 VESA 支架直接连接到显示器上。
设备
作为一款微型电脑,它的连接范围非常广泛。在这一领域,Geekom 秉承了自己的一贯风格,因为系统制造商尚未在这一领域出现任何重大失误。大部分连接都位于机身后部,为用户考虑周全。前部还有两个快速 USB 端口,在需要快速插入 U 盘时非常有用。如果还能通过两个 USB-C 端口输出图像,则最多可同时控制四个屏幕。其中一个还提供 USB4 接口,非常适合连接其他配件。我们一如既往地测试了外置显卡的性能,稍后再详述。我们还想提一下 2.5G 网络连接和 SD 读卡器,由于 UHS-II 的速度,它们的性能非常出色。
SD 读卡器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Geekom A5 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom A8 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Mini PC (15.1 - 214, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom A8 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom A5 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Mini PC (18.2 - 221, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
交流
Geekom AE7 配备了联发科 Wi-Fi 6E 无线电模块,也可在 6 GHz 频段工作。我们的基准测试表明,如果有条件,应主要使用这一连接选项。在 5 GHz 频段,传输速率明显低于大多数竞争对手。不过,它仍然完全适合日常使用。使用 6 GHz 无线连接时,数据传输速度明显更快。这些数值是结合华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器确定的。
配件
交货范围很广,包括设备直接投入运行所需的一切。除了微型电脑本身,还包括一个 120 瓦的电源装置和一个用于 VESA 安装的安装板。此外,还包括 HDMI 电缆、快速入门指南和必备的感谢卡。
维护
由于 Geekom 只销售预配置选项的 AE7,因此一开始就不存在维护问题。和以前一样,微型电脑很容易打开。只需拧松底部的四颗小螺丝,就可以取下底板。进入内部后,我们可以比较容易地接触到内存和固态硬盘。如果需要,还可以取下 WLAN 模块。它位于固态硬盘的正下方。该设备已经配备齐全,只有直接更换组件才能进行升级。要访问 CPU 风扇,必须拆下整个电路板。不过,只要掌握一点技巧也是可以做到的。
可持续性
Geekom AE7 用一个小纸箱交付,与实际测试设备的尺寸相符。附件也是用单独的塑料袋包装,不利于可持续发展。设备主要由塑料和金属制成。我们不知道在制造过程中是否使用了特殊的回收材料。
性能 - AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS,生产效率高
Geekom AE7 配备了 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS.Ryzen 8000 型号已经有了继任者,但正如我们在大多数测试中看到的那样,Geekom AE7 不需要躲避 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS,它的人工智能性能略逊一筹。其余配置包括 32 GB DDR5 内存和 1 TB SSD,这意味着 Geekom AE7 也能应对内存密集型的日常任务。
测试条件
我们使用平衡
电源计划进行了所有性能测试。我们没有改变 SoC 的性能,而是根据 BIOS 设置将其保持在交付状态。
处理器
餈 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS还远未过时。该系统芯片拥有 8 个 Zen4 内核,可同时处理 16 个线程,因此具有出色的多线程性能。与 Geekom A5我们的平均性能提高了 17%。在单项基准测试中,领先幅度达到了惊人的 50%,这再次说明了更新架构所能带来的影响。我们还在一些设备上测试了英特尔当前的 Meteor Lake 处理器。英特尔 Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti配备了 英特尔酷睿超 9 185H性能相当不错。Geekom 将 65 瓦定义为 AE7 中处理器的短期功耗极限。在持续负载的情况下,功耗会逐渐降至 45 瓦,散热系统仍能应付。
有关进一步的比较和基准测试,请参阅我们的 CPU 对比表.
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
WinRAR - Result | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Acemagic AM18 |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A5 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Geekom A5 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A5 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Geekom A5 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A7 |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 | |
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A5 | |
Average of class Mini PC (561 - 51004, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A5 | |
Average of class Mini PC (3604 - 214250, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (225 - 9399, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (8172 - 184747, n=118, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (408 - 29064, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A5 | |
Average of class Mini PC (1958 - 113499, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Average of class Mini PC (3691 - 325960, n=118, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (74.8 - 2039, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom A5 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (308 - 26952, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (4408 - 50500, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom A5 |
Cinebench R15 多回路
乍一看,Geekom AE7 在 Cinebench R15 连续循环中运行得相当不错。仔细观察遥测数据可以发现,CPU 温度在第一次运行时就已达到极限。因此,在接下来的运行过程中,性能损失并不大。不过,AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 仍然取得了 2563 分的优异成绩。
系统性能
Geekom AE7 的系统性能无可挑剔。我们的所有测试程序都能快速打开,没有明显的延迟。原则上,这适用于所有参与测试的对比设备。由于 CPU 性能很高,在日常办公中很少会达到硬件的极限。Geekom 采用 32GB DDR5 内存,安装速度为 5,600 MT/s。有了它,系统在我们的 AIDA64 测试中也表现出色。只有 Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti才能在一定程度上脱颖而出。
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (6481 - 89287, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Average of class Mini PC (6914 - 98398, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (6862 - 98583, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
Geekom AE7 的 DPC 延迟测量结果并不令人信服。在简单上网时,我们已经看到了明显较高的延迟值,而在播放 4K 测试视频时,延迟值会再次增加。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic AM18 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
Geekom AE7 包含一块来自 Wodposit 的 1 TB 固态硬盘。该固态硬盘采用 PCIe 4.0 x4 速度,在我们的测试中提供了良好的传输速率。宏碁 N7000 和 Crucial P3 Plus 这两款速度更快的固态硬盘的性能无法与我们测试样品中的固态硬盘相提并论。有了良好的散热,Geekom 可以确保 AE7 的大容量存储设备在负载情况下保持稳定的性能。底板用于固态硬盘的散热。不过需要注意的是,Geekom AE7 只能安装一个大容量存储设备。
如需进一步比较和基准测试,请参阅我们的 比较表.
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Average of class Mini PC | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Acemagic AM18 |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
显卡 - AMD Radeon 780M,性能良好
AMD 对 Ryzen 7000 处理器的 iGPU 进行了改进。iGPU AMD Radeon 780M是目前最好的 iGPU 之一。不过,它的性能在很大程度上取决于 APU 的 TDP 额定值。正如我们已经看到的,SoC 可以在 45 瓦的功率下稳定运行。在性能比较中,这足以在 3DMark 基准测试中取得优异成绩。配备英特尔 Arc8 iGPU 的 Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 表明,英特尔在这方面能够迎头赶上。不过,我们的测试设备还是领先了 7 个百分点。
更多比较和基准测试请参见我们的 GPU 对比表.
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 | |
Extreme Preset DX11 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A5 |
Unigine Superposition | |
1280x720 720p Low | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 1080p High | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 | |
1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 |
ComputeMark v2.1 | |
1024x600 Normal, Score | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
Geekom A8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 |
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit | |
Room GPUs-only | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Sala GPUs-only | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A8 |
Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic AM18 |
Premiere Pro PugetBench - GPU 0.9 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
Photoshop PugetBench - GPU Score | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A5 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
DaVinci Resolve PugetBench - GPU Effects 0.93 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A5 |
Geekom AE7, AMD Radeon 780M R9 7940HS | Aoostar GEM12, AMD Radeon 780M R7 8845HS | Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 9 185H | Geekom A8, AMD Radeon 780M R9 8945HS | Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 7 155H | Acemagic AM18, AMD Radeon 780M R7 7840HS | Geekom A5, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) R7 5800H | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECviewperf 12 | -2% | -52% | -46% | -4% | -48% | 2% | -42% | -20% | |
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05) | 85.3 | 85.7 0% | 41.4 -51% | 49.7 -42% | 87.4 2% | 49.8 -42% | 83.7 -2% | 51.7 -39% | 75.4 ? -12% |
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) | 90.9 | 86.6 -5% | 38.6 -58% | 51.3 -44% | 86.4 -5% | 48.2 -47% | 88.5 -3% | 44.2 -51% | 64.2 ? -29% |
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) | 56.6 | 53.3 -6% | 28.2 -50% | 22.7 -60% | 55.1 -3% | 23.1 -59% | 56.3 -1% | 36.3 -36% | 37 ? -35% |
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) | 71.3 | 67.3 -6% | 42.4 -41% | 58 -19% | 75 5% | 54.9 -23% | 71.5 0% | 40.3 -43% | 64 ? -10% |
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) | 60.5 | 51.4 -15% | 12.2 -80% | 15.9 -74% | 47.7 -21% | 16.9 -72% | 60.5 0% | 18.2 -70% | 28.5 ? -53% |
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) | 25.2 | 30.3 20% | 19.1 -24% | 19.9 -21% | 25.8 2% | 18.2 -28% | 30 19% | 21.7 -14% | 35.3 ? 40% |
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) | 117 | 114 -3% | 46.6 -60% | 43 -63% | 106 -9% | 42.7 -64% | 116 -1% | 68.3 -42% | 72.4 ? -38% |
SPECviewperf 13 | 0% | -55% | -52% | -3% | -53% | 4% | -43% | -16% | |
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) | 84 | 82.4 -2% | 41.2 -51% | 48.5 -42% | 85.8 2% | 46.4 -45% | 83.1 -1% | 51.6 -39% | 74.8 ? -11% |
Catia (catia-05) | 132 | 124 -6% | 54.7 -59% | 76.8 -42% | 126 -5% | 71.6 -46% | 129 -2% | 62.1 -53% | 91.4 ? -31% |
Creo (creo-02) | 87.2 | 90.7 4% | 42.7 -51% | 29.3 -66% | 92.8 6% | 29.6 -66% | 92 6% | 50.6 -42% | 73 ? -16% |
Energy (energy-02) | 24.4 | 22.2 -9% | 4.62 -81% | 5.27 -78% | 22.6 -7% | 5.69 -77% | 24.1 -1% | 10.6 -57% | 17.7 ? -27% |
Maya (maya-05) | 107 | 109 2% | 51.6 -52% | 62.5 -42% | 103 -4% | 59.5 -44% | 108 1% | 56.5 -47% | 97.5 ? -9% |
Medical (medical-02) | 78.6 | 70.5 -10% | 15.6 -80% | 25 -68% | 69.2 -12% | 29.7 -62% | 79 1% | 31 -61% | 37.6 ? -52% |
Showcase (showcase-02) | 25.4 | 29.9 18% | 19.1 -25% | 19.9 -22% | 24.2 -5% | 18.2 -28% | 29.9 18% | 21.5 -15% | 35 ? 38% |
Solidworks (sw-04) | 98.9 | 104 5% | 58.3 -41% | 45.6 -54% | 97.3 -2% | 44.8 -55% | 107 8% | 72.4 -27% | 76.6 ? -23% |
SPECviewperf 2020 | 6% | -64% | -51% | 20% | -54% | 1% | -48% | -15% | |
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 12.7 | 11.2 -12% | 2.69 -79% | 4.23 -67% | 10.9 -14% | 5.05 -60% | 13 2% | 4.82 -62% | 7.59 ? -40% |
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 14.4 | 19.9 38% | 3.17 -78% | 6.03 -58% | 31 115% | 4.61 -68% | 14.2 -1% | 5.33 -63% | 10.5 ? -27% |
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 30.2 | 33.4 11% | 16.3 -46% | 18.5 -39% | 35.6 18% | 17.9 -41% | 31.2 3% | 19.1 -37% | 29.6 ? -2% |
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 23.7 | 23.2 -2% | 8.53 -64% | 11.1 -53% | 24.6 4% | 10 -58% | 24.7 4% | 13.1 -45% | 18.1 ? -24% |
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 20.7 | 20.4 -1% | 10.3 -50% | 14.9 -28% | 21 1% | 12.9 -38% | 20.7 0% | 11.3 -45% | 21.7 ? 5% |
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 61.3 | 64.1 5% | 6.62 -89% | 6.24 -90% | 65.9 8% | 5.7 -91% | 61.1 0% | 38 -38% | 37.5 ? -39% |
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 47.4 | 47.7 1% | 27.3 -42% | 37.7 -20% | 50.1 6% | 35.4 -25% | 46.7 -1% | 25.8 -46% | 56.3 ? 19% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
1% | -57% /
-57% | -50% /
-50% | 4% /
4% | -52% /
-52% | 2% /
2% | -44% /
-44% | -17% /
-17% |
3DMark 05 Standard | 64978 points | |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 44889 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 44603 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 13551 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 165201 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 37530 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7756 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 4151 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3335 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 495 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2869 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
Geekom AE7 并没有明确宣传为游戏电脑。不过,游戏并非完全不可能。过去,我们已经用许多游戏测试过许多采用相同 iGPU 的其他设备。测试结果证明,Geekom AE7 也适合偶尔玩玩游戏。
要详细了解 iGPU 与其他显卡相比的性能,请参阅我们的 GPU 游戏列表.
Dota 2 Reborn | |
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A5 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 168 | 158 | 65.1 | 23.9 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 163 | 127.9 | 89.8 | 83.2 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 75.1 | 36 | 27.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 64.4 | 47.1 | 39.6 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 42.8 | 33 | 25.7 | 24.6 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 45 | 35.1 | 27.4 | 24.3 |
F1 24 (2024) | 94.8 | 80.1 | 59.5 | 14.4 |
Geekom AE7 遇见 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Geekom AE7 有一个 USB4 端口,我们使用它来通过 eGPU 提高 3D 性能。在不影响整体评分的情况下,我们结合 Razer Core X 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 进行了一些测试。最终,使用外置显卡可以大幅提升 3D 性能。即使是现代游戏也能享受到完整的细节。不过,值得注意的是,由于 USB4 连接的原因,NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 与传统台式机系统相比,并不能发挥全部性能。外置显卡可以通过 USB4 工作,但最多只能以 PCIe 3.0 x4 的速度工作。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Unigine Superposition | |
1280x720 720p Low | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1920x1080 1080p High | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
3840x2160 4k Optimized | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
7680x4320 8k Optimized | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Extreme Preset DX11 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
ComputeMark v2.1 | |
1024x600 Normal, Score | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
DaVinci Resolve PugetBench - GPU Effects 0.93 | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Photoshop PugetBench - GPU Score | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) |
Premiere Pro PugetBench - GPU 0.9 | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7, AMD Radeon 780M R9 7940HS | Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), R9 7940HS | Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), R9 8945HS | Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), i9-13900H | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECviewperf 12 | 98% | 94% | 97% | -22% | |
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05) | 85.3 | 147 72% | 146 71% | 147 72% | 75.4 ? -12% |
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) | 90.9 | 113 24% | 112 23% | 116 28% | 64.2 ? -29% |
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) | 56.6 | 62 10% | 62.9 11% | 62.9 11% | 37 ? -35% |
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01) | 20.9 | 13.3 -36% | 13.3 -36% | 13.4 -36% | 13.3 ? -36% |
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) | 71.3 | 235 230% | 235 230% | 228 220% | 64 ? -10% |
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) | 60.5 | 74.4 23% | 74.8 24% | 73.4 21% | 28.5 ? -53% |
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) | 25.2 | 150 495% | 141 460% | 149 491% | 35.3 ? 40% |
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) | 117 | 80.1 -32% | 81.6 -30% | 77.2 -34% | 72.4 ? -38% |
SPECviewperf 13 | 125% | 120% | 127% | -16% | |
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) | 84 | 147 75% | 145 73% | 147 75% | 74.8 ? -11% |
Catia (catia-05) | 132 | 163 23% | 163 23% | 164 24% | 91.4 ? -31% |
Creo (creo-02) | 87.2 | 232 166% | 231 165% | 232 166% | 73 ? -16% |
Energy (energy-02) | 24.4 | 25.9 6% | 25.9 6% | 25.9 6% | 17.7 ? -27% |
Maya (maya-05) | 107 | 350 227% | 351 228% | 363 239% | 97.5 ? -9% |
Medical (medical-02) | 78.6 | 64.1 -18% | 64.1 -18% | 65.2 -17% | 37.6 ? -52% |
Showcase (showcase-02) | 25.4 | 151 494% | 141 455% | 151 494% | 35 ? 38% |
Solidworks (sw-04) | 98.9 | 123 24% | 125 26% | 127 28% | 76.6 ? -23% |
SPECviewperf 2020 | 91% | 116% | 89% | -15% | |
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 12.7 | 13 2% | 10.8 -15% | 10.8 -15% | 7.59 ? -40% |
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 14.4 | 20.9 45% | 50.3 249% | 21 46% | 10.5 ? -27% |
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 30.2 | 76.8 154% | 76.6 154% | 76.4 153% | 29.6 ? -2% |
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 23.7 | 39.2 65% | 38.8 64% | 40.1 69% | 18.1 ? -24% |
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 20.7 | 46.5 125% | 45.9 122% | 47.3 129% | 21.7 ? 5% |
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 61.3 | 16.6 -73% | 16.6 -73% | 16.5 -73% | 37.5 ? -39% |
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 47.4 | 199 320% | 195 311% | 196 314% | 56.3 ? 19% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 105% /
105% | 110% /
110% | 104% /
105% | -18% /
-18% |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 110.4 | 88.5 | 77.7 | 76.8 | 60.9 | 36.9 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 96.1 | 81.5 | 73 | 64.5 | 44.9 | 22.3 |
F1 24 (2024) | 88.2 | 82.2 | 68.3 | 46.4 | 36.1 | 17.8 |
排放 - 冷却装置较弱,效率较高
噪音排放
噪音是 Geekom AE7 的最大弱点。空转时,系统仍然相对安静,甚至几乎没有噪音。不过,在负载情况下,这种情况很快就会改变。风扇转速大幅上升,峰值可达 52 dB(A)。即使在平均负载情况下,也不会有太大的变化,这有点令人遗憾。如果能对风扇曲线稍作调整,就能从主观上改善 Geekom AE7 的日常使用。将其安装在显示器上可以略微改善对声压级的主观感受,因为这样设备就不会直接放在你的办公桌上了。
值得一提的是,BIOS 中的风扇速度默认设置为性能模式。此外,还提供平衡模式和静音模式。后者可使设备在负载情况下稍微安静一些。不过,Geekom AE7 的声音仍然清晰可闻。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.9 / 25 / 25 dB(A) |
Load |
| 52 / 51.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.4 dB(A) |
Geekom AE7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Geekom A5 R7 5800H, Vega 8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 8% | -0% | -3% | 3% | 1% | -9% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 24.4 | 24.3 -0% | 24.3 -0% | 24.1 1% | 24.4 -0% | 24.9 -2% | 24.8 -2% | 25 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.9 | 27.5 -10% | 27.9 -12% | 29.8 -20% | 24.5 2% | 25.4 -2% | 31 -24% | 28.2 -13% |
Idle Average * | 25 | 27.6 -10% | 27.9 -12% | 29.9 -20% | 24.7 1% | 25.7 -3% | 31.2 -25% | 28.2 -13% |
Idle Maximum * | 25 | 27.6 -10% | 28 -12% | 30 -20% | 24.7 1% | 25.7 -3% | 31.4 -26% | 28.2 -13% |
Load Average * | 52 | 36 31% | 43.8 16% | 37.3 28% | 48.5 7% | 47.8 8% | 37.1 29% | 47.8 8% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 52 | 35.4 32% | 45.4 13% | |||||
Load Maximum * | 51.4 | 38.2 26% | 48.5 6% | 43.5 15% | 49.2 4% | 49 5% | 53.7 -4% | 47.4 8% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.4 | 40.2 | 47 | 45.23 | 37.6 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在温度方面,我们首先来看机箱温度值。Geekom 一直在控制温度,我们在赛博朋克压力测试中仅录得最高 42.5 °C。散热装置的设计可以从侧面吸入新鲜空气,然后从机箱后部导出。因此,后部某些地方的温度会稍高一些。Geekom 似乎为处理器本身设定了 92 °C 的温度极限。我们已经在 Cinbenench R15 多回路中看到过处理器的这一数值。在 Prime95 压力测试中,CPU 平均温度约为 87 °C。在我们的负载测试中,CPU 可以以 45 瓦的功耗稳定运行。
尽管如此,我们还是希望散热装置能稍微强大一些。在高度方面,由于无法安装第二个大容量存储设备,制造商在下部区域放弃了大量空间。不过,机箱的设计就是为此而生的,这意味着 Geekom 必须在这里设计一款全新的机型。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 36.2 °C / 97 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.2 °C / 90 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.2 °C / 90 F for the class Mini PC.
能源管理
在功耗方面,Geekom AE7 在空闲模式下的低功耗令人惊喜。即使是 Geekom A5、 以及 Geekom A8在这方面也表现出色。不过,在平均负载下,电源装置需要提供近 82 瓦的功率,尽管我们的测量设备显示峰值功率略高于 100 瓦。这意味着 Geekom AE7 并不是最经济的微型电脑之一。不过,在我们使用 Cinebench 评估的效率概览中,我们的测试样品表现相当不错。只有基于 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS效率更高一些。
我们已经熟悉了许多 Geekom 迷你 PC 所配备的 120 瓦电源装置。在测试过程中,我们从未遇到过电源问题。
Off / Standby | 0.9 / 2.6 Watt |
Idle | 4.5 / 4.7 / 8.1 Watt |
Load |
81.8 / 100.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Geekom AE7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Geekom A5 R7 5800H, Vega 8 | Average AMD Radeon 780M | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -45% | -52% | -55% | 12% | -55% | -69% | -19% | -20% | -61% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.5 | 8.2 -82% | 7.9 -76% | 8.2 -82% | 3.2 29% | 9.1 -102% | 9.8 -118% | 6.9 -53% | 6.29 ? -40% | 9.48 ? -111% |
Idle Average * | 4.7 | 10 -113% | 10.3 -119% | 12.1 -157% | 4.9 -4% | 10.3 -119% | 11.5 -145% | 7.9 -68% | 8.47 ? -80% | 11.5 ? -145% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.1 | 14.6 -80% | 22.3 -175% | 14 -73% | 6.8 16% | 14.4 -78% | 15.3 -89% | 8.9 -10% | 10.9 ? -35% | 14.9 ? -84% |
Load Average * | 81.8 | 73.9 10% | 57.44 30% | 53.1 35% | 71.3 13% | 54.9 33% | 75.3 8% | 60.8 26% | 56.4 ? 31% | 57.4 ? 30% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 71.2 | 79.9 -12% | 55.9 21% | |||||||
Load Maximum * | 100.3 | 95.3 5% | 93.4 7% | 100.4 -0% | 93.2 7% | 110.4 -10% | 102.8 -2% | 89.7 11% | 75.7 ? 25% | 97.5 ? 3% |
* ... smaller is better
Efficiency
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A |
Power Consumption | |
Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor) | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom AE7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
Power consumtion with external monitor
Power consumtion with external monitor
Pros
Cons
结论:熟悉的外壳搭配全新的 CPU
Geekom AE7 是一款不起眼的微型电脑,但它在测试中的出色表现却给人留下了深刻印象。从外观上看,Geekom 只是改变了常用外壳的颜色。银色的外观给人一种优雅、高品质的感觉。在触感方面,Geekom 已经为新款产品设定了很高的标准,现在必须以此来衡量 Geekom AE7。我们的测试样品在这场对决中显然败下阵来,因为完全由铝合金制成的外壳传递出完全不同的感觉。如果不是因为目前的价格,就没有必要把话题扩大到如此程度,因为我们公司的竞争产品只是略微贵一些,甚至更便宜。例如 Geekom A8配备 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS售价仅为 699 美元。
Geekom AE7 是一款基于 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 的功能强大的迷你 PC。不过,该机的防尘设计和小型散热装置有待改进。
做工本身没有什么可批评的。AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 的性能也是如此,在负载高达 45 瓦的情况下也能稳定工作。整体设备还包括 32 GB DDR5 内存和 1 TB SSD,可以处理大多数任务。外部连接也令人印象深刻,因为还包括 USB4。与此同时,许多现代设备都提供了带宽稍高的选项,可通过 OCuLink 使用外置显卡。Geekom 在其产品组合中还没有这方面的解决方案,这就是为什么你只能使用稍慢的 USB4 连接。
总而言之,Geekom AE7 是一款性能不错的迷你电脑。散热装置的声音始终清晰可闻,但仍有待改进。这可以通过静音模式来解决,但首先必须在 BIOS 中激活静音模式。风扇的尺寸最好能大一些,但这样会导致机箱明显增大。Aoostar GEM12 就是一个很好的例子。这款机箱仅稍大一些,但却能提供更强大的散热装置,而且工作时也更加安静。
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息请点击 这里.
价格和供应情况
制造商在其网上商店列出的 Geekom AE7 售价为740 欧元(美国为 664 美元)。在美国,感兴趣的用户可以通过亚马逊订购这款迷你电脑。
Geekom AE7
- 07/14/2024 v8
Sebastian Bade
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.