Geekom GT13 Pro 迷你 PC 评测 - 配备英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H、32 GB DDR4 内存和 2 TB 固态硬盘的时尚 NUC 替代品
![](fileadmin/_processed_/c/0/csm_GT13_32_afe0cd858f.jpg)
随着 Geekom GT13 Pro 的推出,该制造商在其产品组合中拥有了一款基于英特尔处理器的功能非常强大的迷你 PC。遗憾的是,Geekom 只使用 Raptor Lake H 处理器,尽管英特尔最近推出了更新的 Meteor Lake 芯片。最佳配置为 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H搭配 32 GB 内存和 2 TB 固态硬盘。在价格方面,你必须掏腰包,因为最终账单为 930 欧元。基于英特尔酷睿 i7-13620H 处理器的 Geekom GT13 Pro 仅售 721 欧元。 英特尔酷睿 i7-13620H则便宜得多。虽然大容量存储空间只有 1 TB 的一半,但 32 GB 内存与便宜的机型拥有相同的工作内存。
让我们来仔细看看 Geekom GT13 Pro 与其他高性能迷你 PC 相比的优势。由于价格原因,大家对它的期望值已经非常高了。我们在下表中汇总了本次评测中与 Geekom 配套的对比设备。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Date | Version | Model | Memory | Weight | Height | price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/2024 | v8 (new) | Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 440 g | 37 mm | 930 EUR |
06/2024 | v8 (new) | Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 653 g | 60 mm | 649 US-Dollar |
05/2024 | v7 (old) | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | 32768 MB | 863 g | 48.6 mm | 959 Euro |
05/2024 | v7 (old) | Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 432 g | 38 mm | 949 EUR |
04/2024 | v7 (old) | Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 545 g | 37 mm | 899 EUR |
04/2024 | v7 (old) | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 32768 MB | 768 g | 57 mm | 1199 EUR |
12/2023 | v7 (old) | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 750 g | 52.3 mm | 879 EUR |
08/2023 | v7 (old) | Khadas Mind i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 438 g | 20 mm |
注:我们已经更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。 这里.
外壳 - 0.5 升铝制外壳,颜色各异
设备 - 选择丰富,包括 2x USB4
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Khadas Mind (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom A5 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom A8 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom Mini IT13 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Mini PC (15.1 - 181.8, n=21, last 2 years) | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Khadas Mind (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom A8 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom A5 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom Mini IT13 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Mini PC (18.2 - 200, n=21, last 2 years) | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
交流
在 Geekom GT13 Pro 中,我们看到了同样的无线电模块,它也用于 Geekom A8.联发科 Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 WLAN 模块可在 2.4 GHz、5 GHz 和 6 GHz 频率范围内工作。我们的测量仅限于 5 和 6 GHz 频段。我们只记录了与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 测试路由器在性能上的细微差别。遗憾的是,Geekom 没有提供现代 Wi-Fi 模块。这两个 Acemagic F2A以及 Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti都能使用英特尔 Wi-Fi 7 BE200 提供略好的效果。Geekom GT13 Pro 还有一个 RJ45 插座。数据传输速率最高可达 2.5 GBit/s。
配件
维护
Geekom GT13 Pro 始终与内存和固态硬盘一起销售。这意味着不必像裸机那样,必须打开设备才能安装缺少的硬件组件。如果还需要进入内部,可以从底部打开 Geekom GT13 Pro。胶粘的橡胶脚垫下隐藏着四颗螺丝,用于固定塑料盖。这里要小心,以免损坏 WLAN 天线线缆。塑料盖下还有一块金属板,如果要访问固态硬盘或内存,也需要将其取下。WLAN 模块也可以更换。要访问冷却装置(制造商宣传为 IceBlast 1.5),必须将电路板从外壳中完全拆下,这在实际操作中并非难事。
性能 - 英特尔 Raptor Lake 处理器,多达 14 个内核
Geekom GT13 Pro 有两个版本。顶级型号配备 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H配备 14 个核心,可确保良好的多线程性能。如果你想让钱包轻松一点,也可以购买时尚的迷你电脑,配备 英特尔酷睿 i7-13620H.这款处理器拥有 10 个内核和 16 个线程,也能很好地满足日常使用需求。32 GB DDR4 内存始终随附其中,因此可作为处理内存消耗量大的任务的坚实基础。
测试条件
在 Geekom GT13 Pro 的所有性能测试中,我们都使用了 "最高性能 "电源方案。根据我们的测试标准,只有在功耗和噪音测量中出现偏差。 测试标准.英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 的制造商功率限制定义为 64 瓦(PL2)和 35 瓦(PL1)。
处理器
顶级的 Geekom GT13 Pro 配备了 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H.不过,在性能评级中,我们可以看到我们的测试样品只能排在中场位置。由于散热能力较低,再加上极其紧凑的设计,SoC 在连续负载下的最低 TDP 只有 35 瓦。在多线程基准测试中,英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 的性能有时会比我们迄今为止记录的这款处理器的平均性能低 20% 至 30%。
有关进一步的比较和基准测试,请参阅我们的 CPU 对比表.
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Khadas Mind |
WinRAR - Result | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6800 - 9303, n=2) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Khadas Mind |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (171.4 - 340, n=19) | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Cinebench R15 多回路
Cinebench R15 连续循环测试结果表明,开始运行时可以取得明显更好的效果。在第一次运行中,英特尔 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H的 PL2 值(64 瓦)保持的时间要稍长一些。不过,除少数例外情况外,SoC 随后在最大 35 瓦的情况下也能提供稳定的性能。
系统性能
总体而言,Geekom GT13 Pro 在系统测试中表现不错。不过,测试系统在与竞争对手的竞争中很难占得上风。造成这一结果的原因很可能是性能上的损失,其中有一部分是自找的。不过,在日常任务中的表现还是不错的。宽敞的工作内存和快速的大容量存储使系统主观上表现良好。
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Khadas Mind | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (6481 - 71990, n=111, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (6914 - 75449, n=111, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Khadas Mind | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (6862 - 89318, n=111, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A8 | |
Khadas Mind | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 154.6, n=111, last 2 years) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Khadas Mind |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
Geekom GT13 Pro 拥有 2 TB 的存储空间,配置出色,可为许多应用程序提供充足的存储空间。它安装了宏碁的固态硬盘,在性能方面令人印象深刻。记录的结果足以让它落后于 傲星 GEM12位居第二。不过,固态硬盘在连续负载情况下难以保持高性能。虽然制造商为固态硬盘安装了被动散热装置,但这终究不足以保持性能稳定。与初始值相比,读取率下降了近 50%。不过,从连续性能图中可以看出,这并非完全失败。宏碁 N7000 的读取速度略低于 4000 MB/s,仍然快于其他微型电脑的大容量存储设备。Geekom GT13 Pro 共可安装两个固态硬盘。不过需要注意的是,第二个 M.2 插槽仅支持长度为 42 毫米的 SATA 固态硬盘。
有关进一步的比较和基准测试,请参阅我们的 比较表.
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
处理器的选择对 3D 性能有重大影响。Geekom 选择了 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H的 iGPU 只有 英特尔 Iris Xe 图形处理器 G7.不过,在最高配置级别中使用了 96 个 EU 的图形适配器。然而,英特尔 Iris Xe Graphics G7 已无法跟上 Meteor Lake 机型更新的 iGPU。我们几乎可以看到两个级别的排名。所有配备英特尔 Iris Xe 图形处理器 G7 的设备都排在第三位。这些设备的性能几乎完全相同。所有其他可与更先进、更强大的 iGPU(英特尔 Arc 8 图形处理器)竞争的设备都是如此。英特尔 Arc 8和 AMD Radeon 780)相抗衡的其他设备都能明显脱颖而出。
有关进一步的比较和基准测试,请参阅我们的 GPU 对照表.
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Geekom A8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Khadas Mind |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Khadas Mind | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Khadas Mind | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Khadas Mind | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX |
Photoshop PugetBench - GPU Score | |
Geekom A8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Premiere Pro PugetBench - GPU 0.9 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Khadas Mind | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
DaVinci Resolve PugetBench - GPU Effects 0.93 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H | Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900H | Khadas Mind, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i7-1360P | Aoostar GEM12, AMD Radeon 780M R7 8845HS | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 9 185H | Geekom A8, AMD Radeon 780M R9 8945HS | Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 7 155H | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX, AMD Radeon 780M R7 7840HS | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECviewperf 12 | -5% | -9% | 662% | 20% | 674% | 26% | 725% | 434% | |
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05) | 41.4 | 40.1 -3% | 37.8 -9% | 85.7 107% | 49.7 20% | 87.4 111% | 49.8 20% | 85 105% | 71 ? 71% |
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) | 38.6 | 37.1 -4% | 39.4 2% | 86.6 124% | 51.3 33% | 86.4 124% | 48.2 25% | 89.8 133% | 62 ? 61% |
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) | 28.2 | 26.9 -5% | 7.37 -74% | 53.3 89% | 22.7 -20% | 55.1 95% | 23.1 -18% | 51.1 81% | 35 ? 24% |
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01) | 0.41 | 0.4 -2% | 0.46 12% | 18.4 4388% | 0.67 63% | 19 4534% | 0.91 122% | 20.1 4802% | 12.8 ? 3022% |
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) | 42.4 | 38.3 -10% | 41.3 -3% | 67.3 59% | 58 37% | 75 77% | 54.9 29% | 73.4 73% | 61.6 ? 45% |
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) | 12.2 | 11.8 -3% | 12 -2% | 51.4 321% | 15.9 30% | 47.7 291% | 16.9 39% | 61.7 406% | 26.7 ? 119% |
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) | 19.1 | 16.6 -13% | 21.2 11% | 30.3 59% | 19.9 4% | 25.8 35% | 18.2 -5% | 30.1 58% | 34.4 ? 80% |
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) | 46.6 | 45.3 -3% | 41.6 -11% | 114 145% | 43 -8% | 106 127% | 42.7 -8% | 113 142% | 69.5 ? 49% |
SPECviewperf 13 | -5% | -3% | 165% | 13% | 160% | 14% | 186% | 94% | |
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) | 41.2 | 40.1 -3% | 39 -5% | 82.4 100% | 48.5 18% | 85.8 108% | 46.4 13% | 86.1 109% | 70.4 ? 71% |
Catia (catia-05) | 54.7 | 51.3 -6% | 57.1 4% | 124 127% | 76.8 40% | 126 130% | 71.6 31% | 132 141% | 89.8 ? 64% |
Creo (creo-02) | 42.7 | 41.1 -4% | 37.5 -12% | 90.7 112% | 29.3 -31% | 92.8 117% | 29.6 -31% | 93.6 119% | 69.6 ? 63% |
Energy (energy-02) | 4.62 | 4.5 -3% | 4.34 -6% | 22.2 381% | 5.27 14% | 22.6 389% | 5.69 23% | 25.8 458% | 16.4 ? 255% |
Maya (maya-05) | 51.6 | 47.5 -8% | 46.3 -10% | 109 111% | 62.5 21% | 103 100% | 59.5 15% | 108 109% | 94.2 ? 83% |
Medical (medical-02) | 15.6 | 14.4 -8% | 16 3% | 70.5 352% | 25 60% | 69.2 344% | 29.7 90% | 79.8 412% | 33.2 ? 113% |
Showcase (showcase-02) | 19.1 | 17.3 -9% | 21.4 12% | 29.9 57% | 19.9 4% | 24.2 27% | 18.2 -5% | 30 57% | 34 ? 78% |
Solidworks (sw-04) | 58.3 | 57.1 -2% | 53.7 -8% | 104 78% | 45.6 -22% | 97.3 67% | 44.8 -23% | 107 84% | 74.4 ? 28% |
SPECviewperf 2020 | -2% | -1% | 309% | 38% | 367% | 29% | 288% | 185% | |
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 2.69 | 3.49 30% | 2.67 -1% | 11.2 316% | 4.23 57% | 10.9 305% | 5.05 88% | 12 346% | 6.93 ? 158% |
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 3.17 | 3.05 -4% | 2.97 -6% | 19.9 528% | 6.03 90% | 31 878% | 4.61 45% | 15.4 386% | 10.9 ? 244% |
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 16.3 | 14.8 -9% | 16.9 4% | 33.4 105% | 18.5 13% | 35.6 118% | 17.9 10% | 31.4 93% | 29.2 ? 79% |
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 8.53 | 7.78 -9% | 8.82 3% | 23.2 172% | 11.1 30% | 24.6 188% | 10 17% | 24.4 186% | 18.3 ? 115% |
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 10.3 | 9.69 -6% | 10.1 -2% | 20.4 98% | 14.9 45% | 21 104% | 12.9 25% | 21 104% | 21.2 ? 106% |
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 6.62 | 6.29 -5% | 6.01 -9% | 64.1 868% | 6.24 -6% | 65.9 895% | 5.7 -14% | 61.5 829% | 39.1 ? 491% |
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 27.3 | 23.9 -12% | 27.8 2% | 47.7 75% | 37.7 38% | 50.1 84% | 35.4 30% | 47.2 73% | 56.1 ? 105% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-4% | -4% /
-5% | 379% /
381% | 24% /
23% | 400% /
402% | 23% /
23% | 400% /
405% | 238% /
240% |
3DMark 05 Standard | 43190 points | |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 33774 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 28241 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 8027 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 147975 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 27505 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5420 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2573 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1926 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 186 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 1283 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
许多现代游戏都让英特尔 Iris Xe iGPU 吃不消。不过,我们可以看到,如果牺牲一些游戏的细节,在某些游戏中仍然可以达到可玩的帧率。不过,我们无法证明 Geekom GT13 Pro 在这种配置下适合游戏。使用 Geekom A8或 Aoostar GEM12.此外,您还可以选择 Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti它采用英特尔的 Meteor Lake SoC,拥有更强大的 iGPU。
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Geekom A8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
Borderlands 3 | |
1280x720 Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) | |
Geekom A8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Overall Quality (DX11) | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
GTA V | |
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
Geekom A8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Khadas Mind | |
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
F1 2020 | |
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
GTA V (2015) | 119.7 | 97.4 | 22 | 9.07 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 109.8 | 80.2 | 65.5 | 58.6 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 45.1 | 25.3 | 18.2 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 58 | 30 | 28 | 27 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 98.7 | 42.5 | 33.8 | 26.9 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 57.1 | 22.2 | 20.9 | 18 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 52 | 31 | 29 | 27 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 38.5 | 19.1 | 14.2 | 11.2 |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 100.3 | 39.6 | 30.2 | 22.2 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 54.4 | 26.5 | 16.7 | 12.7 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 93.8 | 49.1 | 38.7 | 24.9 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 105.6 | 52.2 | 39.9 | 29.4 |
GRID Legends (2022) | 58.8 | 40.2 | 30.8 | 27.9 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 34 | 26.4 | 16.7 | 13.2 |
F1 22 (2022) | 46.3 | 43.1 | 31.2 | 24.9 |
F1 23 (2023) | 43.2 | 39.4 | 28 | 21.9 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 18 | 14 | 11.7 | 11.2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 18.2 | 14.7 | 12.8 | 11.5 |
Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 68.9 | 48.8 | 34.8 | 30.9 |
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 132.8 | 93.4 | 87.8 | |
F1 24 (2024) | 40.4 | 35.4 | 25.6 | 20.4 |
Geekom GT13 Pro 与 Razer Core X 的性能测试
配备 Razer Core X 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 的 Geekom GT13 Pro
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Unigine Superposition | |
1280x720 720p Low | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
1920x1080 1080p High | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
3840x2160 4k Optimized | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
7680x4320 8k Optimized | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Extreme Preset DX11 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
ComputeMark v2.1 | |
1024x600 Normal, Score | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
DaVinci Resolve PugetBench - GPU Effects 0.93 | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Photoshop PugetBench - GPU Score | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) |
Premiere Pro PugetBench - GPU 0.9 | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3) | |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
GTA V (2015) | 182.1 | 178 | 170.7 | 103.6 | 91.6 | 103.8 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 180.5 | 157.2 | 146.6 | 133.3 | 108.6 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 188 | 142.7 | 98.6 | 78 | 48.3 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 151.3 | 135 | 106.6 | 95.4 | |||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 160 | 138 | 132 | 121 | 99 | 58 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 214 | 160.5 | 156.8 | 152.9 | 130.2 | 84.5 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 118.5 | 101 | 100.8 | 98.5 | 85.9 | 49.6 | |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 138 | 119 | 115 | 104 | 93 | 60 | |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 144.8 | 91.6 | 69.6 | 52.5 | 45.8 | 33.7 | |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 300.4 | 145.6 | 95 | 70.1 | 49.3 | 26.7 | |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 155.8 | 132.4 | 104.8 | 84.6 | 64.6 | 38.3 | |
F1 2020 (2020) | 207 | 127.8 | 128.9 | 105.5 | 90.6 | 61.4 | |
F1 2021 (2021) | 143.5 | 110.1 | 69.1 | 51.7 | 48.1 | 41.4 | |
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 78 | 65 | 53.9 | 46.9 | 45.8 | ||
GRID Legends (2022) | 119.2 | 99.7 | 84 | 70.9 | 64.7 | 51 | |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 178.2 | 138.7 | 100.2 | 81.4 | 61.7 | 36.1 | |
F1 22 (2022) | 61.4 | 56.1 | 43.2 | 27.6 | 26.2 | 19.6 | |
F1 23 (2023) | 67.9 | 66.2 | 54.6 | 33.3 | 31.9 | 10.3 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 113.4 | 90.8 | 78.9 | 79 | 61.4 | 54.7 | 36.9 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 85.3 | 80.4 | 71.3 | 63.9 | 44.9 | 22.1 | |
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 88 | 82 | 77 | 63 | 59 | 56 | |
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 53 | 49 | 43 | 30 | 23 | 9.7 | |
Skull & Bones (2024) | 83 | 77 | 64 | 54 | 45 | 31 | |
F1 24 (2024) | 77.3 | 72.8 | 61.3 | 42 | 36.5 | 28.9 | 19.6 |
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H | Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3), i9-13900H | Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3), R9 8945HS | Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3), i9-13900H | Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE @TB3), i9-12900H | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECviewperf 12 | 679% | 674% | 687% | 630% | |
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05) | 41.4 | 147 255% | 146 253% | 147 255% | 124 200% |
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) | 38.6 | 116 201% | 112 190% | 116 201% | 95.2 147% |
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) | 28.2 | 62.9 123% | 62.9 123% | 64.2 128% | 53.5 90% |
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01) | 0.41 | 13.4 3168% | 13.3 3144% | 13.4 3168% | 13.4 3168% |
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) | 42.4 | 228 438% | 235 454% | 235 454% | 182 329% |
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) | 12.2 | 73.4 502% | 74.8 513% | 76.4 526% | 74.4 510% |
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) | 19.1 | 149 680% | 141 638% | 149 680% | 123 544% |
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) | 46.6 | 77.2 66% | 81.6 75% | 84.6 82% | 71.7 54% |
SPECviewperf 13 | 386% | 374% | 385% | 311% | |
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) | 41.2 | 147 257% | 145 252% | 147 257% | 124 201% |
Catia (catia-05) | 54.7 | 164 200% | 163 198% | 163 198% | 135 147% |
Creo (creo-02) | 42.7 | 232 443% | 231 441% | 231 441% | 194 354% |
Energy (energy-02) | 4.62 | 25.9 461% | 25.9 461% | 25.9 461% | 24 419% |
Maya (maya-05) | 51.6 | 363 603% | 351 580% | 361 600% | 298 478% |
Medical (medical-02) | 15.6 | 65.2 318% | 64.1 311% | 64.9 316% | 56.7 263% |
Showcase (showcase-02) | 19.1 | 151 691% | 141 638% | 150 685% | 125 554% |
Solidworks (sw-04) | 58.3 | 127 118% | 125 114% | 129 121% | 102 75% |
SPECviewperf 2020 | 390% | 518% | 436% | 327% | |
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 2.69 | 10.8 301% | 10.8 301% | 10.8 301% | 11.8 339% |
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 3.17 | 21 562% | 50.3 1487% | 31.1 881% | 18.9 496% |
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 16.3 | 76.4 369% | 76.6 370% | 76.8 371% | 62.7 285% |
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 8.53 | 40.1 370% | 38.8 355% | 39.7 365% | 32.8 285% |
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 10.3 | 47.3 359% | 45.9 346% | 47.6 362% | 40 288% |
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 6.62 | 16.5 149% | 16.6 151% | 16.6 151% | 15.2 130% |
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 27.3 | 196 618% | 195 614% | 197 622% | 155 468% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 485% /
489% | 522% /
522% | 503% /
505% | 423% /
427% |
排放 - IceBlast 1.5 很快达到极限
噪音排放
在散热方面,Geekom GT13 Pro 的设计非常有限。不过,这款迷你电脑在空载时仍然非常安静,尽管在负载情况下可以清晰地听到小风扇的声音。在测试中,我们测得的最大声压级为 48.5 dB(A)。只要达到 PL2 值,GT13 Pro 就能在短时间内达到这一噪音水平。在长时间负载的情况下,SoC 会以 PL1 的极限值工作,这意味着音量会在 39 dB(A) 左右趋于平稳。如果没有永久负载,例如我们用 Prime95 模拟的情况,风扇会非常紧张地工作。在我们的测试样本中,平均负载下的声压级在 38 到 44 dB(A) 之间波动。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 27.9 / 27.9 / 28 dB(A) |
Load |
| 43.8 / 48.5 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M | Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Khadas Mind i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 9% | 1% | 4% | 2% | 2% | 6% | -13% | |
off / environment * | 24.3 | 24.3 -0% | 24.1 1% | 24.4 -0% | 25.4 -5% | 24.9 -2% | 24.8 -2% | 25.2 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 27.9 | 27.5 1% | 29.8 -7% | 24.5 12% | 28 -0% | 25.4 9% | 28.5 -2% | 34.4 -23% |
Idle Average * | 27.9 | 27.6 1% | 29.9 -7% | 24.7 11% | 28.1 -1% | 25.7 8% | 28.5 -2% | 34.4 -23% |
Idle Maximum * | 28 | 27.6 1% | 30 -7% | 24.7 12% | 28.5 -2% | 25.7 8% | 28.7 -3% | 34.5 -23% |
Load Average * | 43.8 | 36 18% | 37.3 15% | 48.5 -11% | 39.6 10% | 47.8 -9% | 32.4 26% | 44.7 -2% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 45.4 | 35.4 22% | ||||||
Load Maximum * | 48.5 | 38.2 21% | 43.5 10% | 49.2 -1% | 44.2 9% | 49 -1% | 39.6 18% | 50.4 -4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.4 | 40.2 | 47 | 47.2 | 45.23 | 32.7 | 49 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.2 °C / 97 F
(-) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 32.1 °C / 90 F.
能源管理
与传统台式电脑相比,迷你电脑一般比较经济,所需的能源也少得多。不过,微型 PC 之间在能耗方面也存在差异。与竞争对手相比,Geekom GT13 Pro 在空闲模式下的能耗为 7.9 瓦至 22.3 瓦,并不特别经济。在平均负载下,我们的测试设备需要 57 瓦,而 120 瓦的电源装置在峰值时需要提供 93.4 瓦。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M | Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Khadas Mind i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 1% | 3% | 31% | 15% | 1% | 2% | 18% | 30% | 3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7.9 | 8.2 -4% | 8.2 -4% | 3.2 59% | 5.7 28% | 9.1 -15% | 8.5 -8% | 7.8 1% | 5.35 ? 32% | 9.61 ? -22% |
Idle Average * | 10.3 | 10 3% | 12.1 -17% | 4.9 52% | 9.5 8% | 10.3 -0% | 10.5 -2% | 10.9 -6% | 8.57 ? 17% | 11.5 ? -12% |
Idle Maximum * | 22.3 | 14.6 35% | 14 37% | 6.8 70% | 16.5 26% | 14.4 35% | 12.9 42% | 11.8 47% | 10.8 ? 52% | 14.6 ? 35% |
Load Average * | 57.44 | 73.9 -29% | 53.1 8% | 71.3 -24% | 53.3 7% | 54.9 4% | 67.2 -17% | 39.2 32% | 45.3 ? 21% | 53.1 ? 8% |
Load Maximum * | 93.4 | 95.3 -2% | 100.4 -7% | 93.2 -0% | 87.8 6% | 110.4 -18% | 97.2 -4% | 76.4 18% | 67.5 ? 28% | 87.1 ? 7% |
* ... smaller is better
Efficiency overview
Power Consumption / Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor) | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Power consumtion with external monitor
Power consumtion with external monitor
Pros
Cons
结论 - 外观漂亮,性能一般,价格昂贵
制造商将一款时尚、小巧的 PC 命名为 Geekom GT13 Pro。英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 是一款功能强大的 SoC,并非基于当前的 Meteor Lake 架构。原则上,如果不一定产生连续负载,该处理器也能提供足够的性能。由于设计小巧,英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 只能以极低的功耗运行。
Geekom GT13 Pro 是一款时尚、功能强大的微型电脑,其强大的功能给人留下了深刻印象。遗憾的是,Geekom GT13 Pro 的价格与性能并不匹配。
从外观上看,Geekom GT13 Pro 的时尚设计给人留下了深刻印象。外观并不是全新的,因为 Geekom A7 和 Geekom A8 已经采用了相同的外壳。在色彩方面,Geekom GT13 Pro 采用了不同的方法,使其有别于 AMD 的同类产品。连接性是 Geekom GT13 Pro 的优势之一,甚至比上述内部竞争对手略胜一筹。两个 USB4 端口很不错,如果需要连接许多外部设备,它们在实际使用中会有所作为。Geekom GT13 Pro 完美通过了外接显卡的测试,尽管其竞争对手在这方面也不落下风。Geekom 不应忽视提供 OCuLink 接口的可能性,以免与某些对手失之交臂。只要没有 Thunderbolt 5,OCuLink 接口目前就是操作外置显卡的更好选择。
紧凑的设计很时尚,选用的材料也很优质。然而,Geekom 不得不问自己,在一个非常小的空间内容纳非常强大的组件,这个概念是否正确。机箱提供的气流有限,很难冷却处理器。最终,这意味着 Geekom GT13 Pro 在负载情况下会有明显的噪音。Minisforum 和 Aoostar 用它们的设备证明,即使是功能强大的组件也能更安静地冷却。
最后,我们还得再看看价格:测试时,Geekom GT13 Pro 的配置价格为 930 欧元。这意味着 GT13 Pro 确实不便宜,可能很难与竞争对手竞争,因为有些竞争对手的价格要便宜得多。
价格和供应情况
Geekom GT13 Pro
-
06/21/2024 v8 (new)
Sebastian Bade
Transparency
The present review sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.