Notebookcheck Logo

惠普 Spectre x360 16 可折叠电脑评测：现在配备 55 WGeForce RTX 4050 显卡

需要进一步调整。

GeForce RTX 4050 GPU 比集成的 Arc 8 配置更胜一筹。然而，CPU 节流错误阻碍了 dGPU 配置的进一步提升。
Meteor Lake Convertible / 2-in-1 Touchscreen Gaming Geforce
惠普 Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
惠普 Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050

在最近评测了新款 Spectre x360 16 的 iGPU 版本之后，我们现在准备来看看同款机型的GeForce RTX 配置。两种配置的笔记本电脑在其他方面基本保持一致，因此我们建议您查看我们的 iGPU SKU 的现有评测来了解这款可转换笔记本电脑的更多物理特性。

我们的评测机配置了第一代酷睿至尊 7 155H CPU、55 WGeForce RTX 4050 GPU、16 GB 焊接内存和 1800p OLED 触摸屏，零售价约为 1600 美元。其他 SKU 可能包括双倍内存或 1600p 120 Hz IPS 触摸屏，但都采用相同的 Core Ultra 7 CPU 和 RTX 4050 GPU。

更多惠普评论：

 

 

HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 (Spectre x360 16 Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 16 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 28 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 1605 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 55 W TDP, GDDR6, 551.61, Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, Onboard, 2800 MHz, Dual-Channel
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 212 PPI, Touchscreen, native pen support, Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, 1024 GB 
Soundcard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Sensors: accelerometer; Gyroscope; IR temperature sensor
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.8 x 356.8 x 245.5
Battery
83 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: 1440p30
Primary Camera: 9.2 MPix HP Wide Vision IR Camera with Shutter
Additional features
Speakers: Quad, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, MyHP, Omen Gaming Hub, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.006 kg, Power Supply: 514 g
Price
1600 USD
Amazon
Links
HP homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
91.1 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU		2 kg19.8 mm16.00"2880x1800
91.4 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core		1.9 kg19.8 mm16.00"2880x1800
from EUR 1899
87.3 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		2 kg19.9 mm16.00"3072x1920
Alternative specs USD 939.00
90 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU		1.9 kg17.9 mm16.00"3072x1920
88.1 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core		1.6 kg19.1 mm16.00"2560x1600
85.8 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		1.5 kg17.2 mm16.00"2560x1600

尺寸比较

❌
358 mm 245.3 mm 19.9 mm 2 kg358 mm 258 mm 19.1 mm 1.6 kg356.8 mm 245.5 mm 19.8 mm 2 kg356.8 mm 245.5 mm 19.8 mm 1.9 kg355 mm 248 mm 17.2 mm 1.5 kg354 mm 241 mm 17.9 mm 1.9 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

交流

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1648 (1598min, 1603.8P1 - 1694max) MBit/s +41%
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1605 (831min - 1698max) MBit/s +37%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1172 (756min - 1362max) MBit/s
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
1144 (654min - 1349max) MBit/s -2%
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
964 (863min - 1044max) MBit/s -18%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
947 (905min - 990max) MBit/s -19%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1681 (1645min, 1652.54P1 - 1693max) MBit/s +18%
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1550 (1522min - 1586max) MBit/s +8%
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1532 (1427min - 1569max) MBit/s +7%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1429 (1235min - 1517max) MBit/s
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
1317 (915min - 1453max) MBit/s -8%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
907 (767min - 946max) MBit/s -37%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1625 (1580min - 1676max) MBit/s +32%
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1623 (1482min - 1674max) MBit/s +32%
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1580 (816min - 1642max) MBit/s +29%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1227 (1085min - 1274max) MBit/s
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
1210 (747min - 1295max) MBit/s -1%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1560 (1470min - 1584max) MBit/s +18%
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1536 (1436min - 1555max) MBit/s +16%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1472 (1012min - 1576max) MBit/s +12%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1320 (1256min - 1381max) MBit/s
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
1111 (866min - 1323max) MBit/s -16%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350Tooltip
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1227 (1085-1274)
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1319 (1256-1381)

网络摄像头

ColorChecker
11.1 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050: 11.3 ∆E min: 3.84 - max: 20.46 ∆E

维护

如下图所示，与 iGPU 版本相比，dGPU 配置包括更长的铜热管，因此重量略重。除此之外，主板几乎完全相同。

2024 Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
2024 Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
2024 Spectre x360 16 iGPU 对比
2024 Spectre x360 16 iGPU 对比

显示屏

388.2
cd/m²		387.8
cd/m²		387.8
cd/m²
386.5
cd/m²		385.2
cd/m²		386.8
cd/m²
383.6
cd/m²		383.8
cd/m²		389.1
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Samsung SDC41A6 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 389.1 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 386.5 cd/m² Minimum: 20.65 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 385.2 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.73 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
96.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"		HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"		HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
AU Optronics AUO50A3, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"		Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
TL160MDMP01, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"		MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
AU Optronics B160QAN03.R, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"		LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
LP160WQ1-SPB2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display
-1%
-15%
-3%
-5%
-5%
Display P3 Coverage
99.6
98.9
-1%
75.6
-24%
98.8
-1%
96.7
-3%
96.5
-3%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.9
0%
100.2
0%
100
0%
99.8
0%
99.9
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
96.7
94.4
-2%
77.2
-20%
89.1
-8%
84.6
-13%
84.6
-13%
Response Times
-6%
-4862%
-630%
-5038%
-3606%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
0.78 ?(0.44, 0.34)
0.8 ?(0.4, 0.4)
-3%
52 ?(23, 29)
-6567%
6.3 ?(2.5, 3.8)
-708%
49.4 ?(22.6, 26.8)
-6233%
38.4 ?(18.6, 19.8)
-4823%
Response Time Black / White *
0.86 ?(0.4, 0.46)
1 ?(0.5, 0.5)
-16%
28 ?(14, 14)
-3156%
5.6 ?(1.6, 4)
-551%
33.9 ?(15.6, 18.3)
-3842%
21.4 ?(9.8, 11.6)
-2388%
PWM Frequency
480 ?(100)
480
0%
Screen
-7%
-102%
13%
-88%
-58%
Brightness middle
385.2
424
10%
425
10%
551
43%
473.6
23%
329
-15%
Brightness
387
425
10%
406
5%
524
35%
456
18%
310
-20%
Brightness Distribution
99
99
0%
78
-21%
91
-8%
87
-12%
88
-11%
Black Level *
0.24
0.52
0.19
0.39
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.73
2.37
-37%
5.8
-235%
1.7
2%
5.9
-241%
3.52
-103%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.95
4.97
-26%
11.03
-179%
4.1
-4%
9.37
-137%
6.96
-76%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.6
2.55
2%
7.57
-191%
2.4
8%
7.3
-181%
5.75
-121%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.49 88%
6600 0%
2.2 100%
1.9 116%
2.137 103%
CCT
6133 106%
6548 99%
6842 95%
7260 90%
7584 86%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.26
4.16
1
0.89
1.15
Contrast
1771
1060
2493
844
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-5% / -5%
-1660% / -943%
-207% / -108%
-1710% / -966%
-1223% / -688%

* ... smaller is better

对比 sRGB
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对 P3
灰度
灰度
饱和扫频
饱和扫频
颜色检查器
颜色检查器

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
0.86 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4 ms rise
↘ 0.46 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.78 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.44 ms rise
↘ 0.34 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 480 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8508 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

0% 亮度
0% 亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度
户外阳光下
户外阳光下
室外阴凉处
室外阴凉处
户外阳光下
户外阳光下
宽广的 OLED 视角
宽广的 OLED 视角

性能

 
 

测试条件

在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将 Windows 和 MyHP 设置为各自的性能模式。系统上同时安装了 MyHP 和 Omen Gaming Hub，但与可用性和电源配置文件相关的大多数重要功能都与 MyHP 有关。

MyHP 主页屏幕
MyHP 主页屏幕
HP 电源配置文件
HP 电源配置文件
音频控制
音频控制
颜色控制
颜色控制

处理器

酷睿至尊 7 155H 酷睿至尊 7 155H在我们的 dGPU 配置中，CPU 的得分低于在我们的 iGPU 配置中相同 CPU 的得分。两个系统之间的差距可能高达 20%，即使经过多次重新测试，成绩也不会提高。事实上，当仔细观察每种配置的 CPU 板功耗水平时，我们的 dGPU 设备中的 CPU 功耗低至 28 W，而我们的 iGPU 设备中的相同 CPU 功耗则稳定在 40 W 的较高水平。

惠普表示，它已经意识到 CPU "在某些工作负载下会不正确地节流"，并正在进行软件更新以解决这一问题。一旦更新上线，我们将在此添加新的结果。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1705 (1414.83-2302.95)
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2022 (1866.8-2531.33)
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1638 (1589.13-2080.04)
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2672 (2597.07-2848.6)
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2289 (2208.24-2361.97)
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1547 (1472-2214.1)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W -2!
Intel Core i9-13980HX
86.1 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE
Intel Core i9-13900H
74.3 pt
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
71.6 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H
65.6 pt
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
64.7 pt
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
64.7 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
64.7 pt
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng -2!
Intel Core i7-12700H
58.2 pt
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
55.6 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 -2!
Intel Core i5-1340P
55.1 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U
51 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U -2!
Intel Core i5-1335U
50.7 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U
48.9 pt
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16
Intel Core i7-1250U
45.2 pt
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2303 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
177.4 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
255 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5609 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
663 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1708 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15154 Points
Help
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
97.8 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
85.4 pt
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
79.6 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
77.2 pt
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
76.5 pt
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
65.1 pt
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
63.4 pt

压力测试

系统空闲
系统空闲

在启动 Prime95 压力时，CPU 时钟频率和主板功耗分别达到 3.2 GHz 和 65 W，几秒钟后分别降至 1.4 GHz 和 28 W，性能相对急剧下降。当 Turbo Boost 频率达到 3.2 GHz 时，核心温度将高达 95 C，因此有必要降低时钟频率以控制温度。

平衡模式和性能模式的图形性能有所不同。例如，在平衡模式下运行时，GPU 时钟频率和电路板功耗 Witcher 3分别稳定在 1920 MHz 和 39 W，而在性能模式下为 2235 MHz 和 53 W。如下表所示，性能模式下的核心温度也更高。

Witcher 3 (平衡模式）
Witcher 3 (平衡模式）
Witcher 3 (性能模式）
Witcher 3 (性能模式）
Prime95 压力
Prime95 压力
Prime95+FurMark 压力
Prime95+FurMark 压力
CPU 时钟 (GHz) GPU 时钟 (MHz) CPU 平均温度 (°C) GPU 平均温度(°C)
系统闲置 -- -- 53 45
Prime95 压力 ~1.5 -- 75 57
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 ~1.1 ~1140 77 64
Witcher 3 压力（平衡模式） ~1.1 1920 66 62
Witcher 3 压力（性能模式） ~1.1 2235 72 71

系统性能

PCMark 10 分数与同型号的 iGPU 配置相当，尽管我们的 dGPU 版本要快得多。不过，对于采用 Optimus 1.0 图形处理器的系统（如我们的 Spectre x360 16 系列）来说，PCMark 从来就不是一个准确的 GPU 基准测试工具。

PCMark 10 标准
PCMark 10 标准
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7033 Points +5%
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
6871 Points +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (6537 - 6973, n=5)
6825 Points +2%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
6800 Points +1%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6720 Points
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X073N
5904 Points -12%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5781 Points -14%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
6720 points
Help
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
91731 MB/s +9%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
84352 MB/s
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
84014 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (62397 - 96791, n=50)
82943 MB/s -2%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
80951 MB/s -4%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
62716 MB/s -26%
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
40944 MB/s -51%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在长达一分钟的 4K60 视频测试中，LatencyMon 发现了 DPC 问题和丢帧问题。我们的 iGPU 评测设备在同一测试中也出现了丢帧现象，这表明两种配置都存在潜在的潜在问题。

延迟监控
延迟监控
驱动程序列表
驱动程序列表
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
16478 μs * -168%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6156.4 μs *
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
1657 μs * +73%
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X073N
1124.3 μs * +82%
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
651.9 μs * +89%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
527.2 μs * +91%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

我们的特定测试装置配备了 SK Hynix PC801而不是 Kioxia XG8。不过，在循环运行 DiskSpd 时，传输速率非常出色，没有出现明显的节流问题。

CDM 8
CDM 8
AS 固态硬盘
AS 固态硬盘
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 5782 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2683 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 305.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 171.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4532 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2686 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 52.53 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 75.83 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
86.8 pt
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
82.6 pt
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
76.4 pt
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X073N
61.9 pt
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
59.1 pt
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
56.6 pt

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036573010951460182521902555292032853650401543804745511054755840620565706935Tooltip
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7171 (6315.36-7275.65)
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7015 (6105.65-7032.81)

图形处理器性能

不用说，与集成的 Arc 8 配置相比，GeForce RTX 4050 的性能大幅提升。3DMark 分数大约提高了 2 倍，而 CUDA 加速则使 Blender 的渲染速度提高了近 10 倍。

不过，从采用相同 RTX 4050 GPU 的其他笔记本电脑的角度来看，Spectre x360 16 的表现并不理想。55 W 的 TGP 目标值低于竞争对手的笔记本电脑，如Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 或Victus 15 ，后者的目标值分别为 130 W 和 75 W。因此，3DMark 分数比我们数据库中采用相同GeForce RTX 4050 GPU 的普通笔记本电脑要慢 10%到 15%。

电源配置文件图形分数物理得分综合得分
性能模式17908172487364
均衡模式15565 (-13%)18672 (+8%)5277 (-28%)
电池电量14156 (-21%)21326 (+24%)5985 (-19%)

Fire Strike 如上表所示，结果并不一致。在平衡模式和电池模式下，CPU 得分会增加，而 GPU 得分则相反，即使在冷启动状态下经过多次重新测试也是如此。惠普也意识到了这个问题，并表示正在进行修复。

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Time Spy
Time Spy
皇家港
皇家港
Fire Strike (平衡模式）
Fire Strike (平衡模式）
Fire Strike 超
Fire Strike 超
快速通道
快速通道
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
100 pt
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
96.8 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
 
86.7 pt
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
76.5 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx -4!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
50.7 pt
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng -2!
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
36.8 pt
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G -2!
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
20.4 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 -2!
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1340P
17.9 pt
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng -2!
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H
17.7 pt
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 -2!
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1250U
14.5 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 -2!
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 7730U
14.4 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP -2!
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 7530U
13.9 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U -2!
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
13.9 pt
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 Performance
19596 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15586 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
6734 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 7530U
710 Seconds *
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 7730U
697 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
68 Seconds * -119%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
31 Seconds *
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
26 Seconds * +16%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
23 Seconds * +26%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
107 Seconds * -98%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
54 Seconds *
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
45 Seconds * +17%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
41 Seconds * +24%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1250U
1001 Seconds * -152%
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
658 Seconds * -66%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
607 Seconds * -53%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 7530U
583 Seconds * -47%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1340P
559 Seconds * -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 7730U
524 Seconds * -32%
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H
487 Seconds * -23%
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
449 Seconds * -13%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
397 Seconds *
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
384 Seconds * +3%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
317 Seconds * +20%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
249 Seconds * +37%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

GeForce RTX 4050 尽管是一款入门级 RTX GPU，但其游戏性能非常强大。像《赛博朋克 2077》这样的高要求游戏，在进行任何 DLSS 增强之前，在 1080p 超高设置下运行良好。不过，在更高分辨率下，情况会变得不稳定，这时建议降低设置以保持帧率。在原生 1800p OLED 显示屏上玩游戏时，画面非常清晰，但要做好调整大部分图形效果的准备。

Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
Performance Rating - Percent
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
100 pt
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
76.8 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
36.7 pt
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
31.4 pt
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
25.2 pt
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
22.2 pt
F1 22 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | The Witcher 3 | X-Plane 11.11 | Dota 2 Reborn | Far Cry 5 | Strange Brigade | Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | Baldur's Gate 3 | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | GTA V
F1 22
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (101.8 - 234, n=21)
182.5 fps +24%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
146.6 (46min, 79P1) fps
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
145.3 (126min, 95P1) fps -1%
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
71.4 (58min, 55P1) fps -51%
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
37.2 (32min, 29P1) fps -75%
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
30.1 (24min, 21P1) fps -79%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
29.3 (23min, 22P1) fps -80%
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
29.1 (24min, 24P1) fps -80%
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16
Intel Core i7-1250U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28 (19min, 20P1) fps -81%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
152.8 (129min, 76P1) fps +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (94.4 - 174.7, n=22)
143.5 fps +15%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
124.6 (100min, 75P1) fps
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
109.5 (94min, 76P1) fps -12%
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
55.1 (41min, 41P1) fps -56%
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
27.2 (23min, 21P1) fps -78%
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
22.5 (16min, 14P1) fps -82%
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16
Intel Core i7-1250U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
22 (17min, 17P1) fps -82%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
21.9 (13min, 13P1) fps -82%
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
21.3 (18min, 17P1) fps -83%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
54.8 (46min, 42P1) fps +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (10.9 - 56.4, n=24)
47.3 fps +13%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
42 (36min, 34P1) fps
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
34 (29min, 24P1) fps -19%
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
21.5 (18min, 17P1) fps -49%
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
16.5 (13min, 13P1) fps -61%
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16
Intel Core i7-1250U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
16.1 (12min, 11P1) fps -62%
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
15 (11min, 11P1) fps -64%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
34.7 (29min, 28P1) fps +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (6.58 - 34, n=14)
27.9 fps +4%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
26.9 (19min, 21P1) fps
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
20.1 (17min, 15P1) fps -25%
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
15 (12min, 12P1) fps -44%
F1 22 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | The Witcher 3 | X-Plane 11.11 | Dota 2 Reborn | Far Cry 5 | Strange Brigade | Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | Baldur's Gate 3 | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | GTA V

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø64.6 (60-69)
lowmed.highultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 171.3 162.2 135.3 76.7 57.3
The Witcher 3 (2015) 299 209.6 120.1 62.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 142 124.2 119.6 106.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 132.7 94.5 68.6 49.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 100.6 86.7 69.7
Far Cry 5 (2018) 97 93 95 87 64
Strange Brigade (2018) 299 171.1 137.4 121.3 81.2
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) 135.1 113.4 75.4 59.1 40.4
F1 22 (2022) 159.4 146.6 124.6 42 26.9
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 84.9 71.4 64 63.1 42.5
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 79.3 63.3 53.5 46 27.5

排放 - 最安静的 16 英寸敞篷车之一

系统噪音

风扇噪音仅略高于 iGPU 配置，而 iGPU 配置本来就非常安静。在性能模式下进行游戏时，我们只能记录到最大 32 分贝（A）的噪音，而 iGPU 版本为 29 分贝（A），去年的 Spectre x360 1660 则为 39 分贝（A）。 去年的 Spectre x360 16设计

风扇噪音曲线（白色：背景，红色：系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark 06，橙色：Witcher 3 压力，绿色：Prime95+FurMark 压力）
风扇噪音曲线（白色：背景，红色：系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark 06，橙色：Witcher 3 压力，绿色：Prime95+FurMark 压力）

Noise Level

Idle
23.6 / 23.6 / 23.6 dB(A)
Load
29.2 / 32.1 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.2303329.7322526.42725.623.126.43126.223.524.821.524.24025.22423.923.325.65025.323.923.123.225.36325.925.523.924.226.28025.22324.125.525.310020.218.719.720.721.312518.318.318.415.917.616020.115.314.513.920.120020.314.415.413.220.325020.914.216.61524.131519.614.916.916.519.740020.415.815.115.119.250022.511.511.912.22063020.511.21110.517.680019.611.211.210.417.2100019.710.510.29.917125019.510.99.39.717160021.711.99.79.718.7200021.213.8101017.6250020.516.510.710.315.6315019.616.61110.515.5400020.21911.61113.8500018.419.411.811.612.8630019.220.611.811.912.5800016.918.912.211.712.21000018.320.511.911.712.3125002022.912.111.812.4160001820.811.511.312.4SPL32.129.223.623.328.5N1.610.50.51.1median 20median 15.8median 11.8median 11.7median 17.2Delta0.53.42.11.73.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N		HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02		HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X073N		Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00		MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB		LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Noise
8%
-21%
-13%
-24%
-12%
off / environment *
23.3
23
1%
26
-12%
24
-3%
24.5
-5%
25.1
-8%
Idle Minimum *
23.6
23
3%
26
-10%
24
-2%
24.5
-4%
25.1
-6%
Idle Average *
23.6
23
3%
26
-10%
24
-2%
26.3
-11%
25.1
-6%
Idle Maximum *
23.6
23
3%
26
-10%
27.2
-15%
26.3
-11%
26.1
-11%
Load Average *
29.2
23
21%
42.9
-47%
29
1%
36.5
-25%
31.4
-8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
32.1
27
16%
42.9
-34%
42.1
-31%
46.3
-44%
41.1
-28%
Load Maximum *
32.1
28.62
11%
39.1
-22%
45
-40%
52.9
-65%
36.6
-14%

* ... smaller is better

温度

正如下面的温度图所示，由于散热解决方案的设计，笔记本电脑右半部分的表面温度要比左半部分高得多。我们的 dGPU 版本的热点温度要高于 iGPU 版本。 Witcher 3分别高达 40 摄氏度和 46 摄氏度，而 iGPU 版本仅为 35 摄氏度和 40 摄氏度。

后排气管
后排气管
当长时间运行高负载时，交流适配器的温度可达 42 C 以上
当长时间运行高负载时，交流适配器的温度可达 42 C 以上
Max. Load
 30.8 °C39.6 °C39.4 °C 
 28.6 °C37 °C38.6 °C 
 25 °C28.8 °C32.2 °C 
Maximum: 39.6 °C
Average: 33.3 °C
39.2 °C29 °C25.6 °C
38.2 °C36.6 °C24.6 °C
31.6 °C29.6 °C24.6 °C
Maximum: 39.2 °C
Average: 31 °C
Power Supply (max.)  37 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-4.2 °C / -7.6 F).
系统空闲（顶部）
系统空闲（顶部）
系统空闲（底部）
系统空闲（底部）
Witcher 3 压力（上）
Witcher 3 压力（上）
Witcher 3 压力（底部）
Witcher 3 压力（底部）
Prime95+FurMark 压力（上）
Prime95+FurMark 压力（上）
Prime95+FurMark 应力（底部）
Prime95+FurMark 应力（底部）
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU		HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU		HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs		Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU		MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU		LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat
-1%
8%
9%
-1%
-24%
Maximum Upper Side *
39.6
37
7%
37.4
6%
39.7
-0%
48.8
-23%
55
-39%
Maximum Bottom *
39.2
44
-12%
39.1
-0%
42.9
-9%
47.6
-21%
55.4
-41%
Idle Upper Side *
29
31
-7%
27.1
7%
23.7
18%
24.2
17%
34.9
-20%
Idle Bottom *
31.6
29
8%
26.3
17%
23.5
26%
23.6
25%
30
5%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

最大音量下的粉红噪声
最大音量下的粉红噪声
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.83333.82531.525.631.53132.924.832.94032.323.932.35034.923.134.96335.923.935.98040.624.140.610047.919.747.912556.718.456.716063.414.563.420067.115.467.125070.216.670.231570.916.970.940073.315.173.350073.711.973.763079.21179.280079.811.279.8100077.910.277.9125080.29.380.2160080.69.780.6200078.61078.6250075.910.775.9315076.31176.3400076.911.676.9500072.911.872.9630070.811.870.8800076.612.276.61000076.711.976.7125007312.1731600071.111.571.1SPL89.523.689.5N86.60.586.6median 75.9median 11.8median 75.9Delta3.82.13.826.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理

耗电量

运行 Witcher 3性能模式下的功耗约为 93 瓦，几乎是 iGPU 配置的 2 倍。使用 Nvidia GPU 的帧速率要快 2 到 3 倍，因此从每瓦特性能的角度来看，较高的功耗需求还是值得的。

在平衡模式而非性能模式下重复上述测试，功耗将降至 75 W。如果你想让系统发挥最大效能，请务必通过 MyHP 启用性能模式。

当 CPU 和 GPU 的使用率均为 100% 时，我们可以记录到中小型（约 13.8 x 6.5 x 2.9 厘米）140 W USB-C 交流适配器的临时最大功耗为 121 W。充电速度不会受到明显影响，因为如上所述，性能节流很快就会启动，将功耗降至 70 W 左右。请注意，iGPU 配置配备的是一个较小的 100 W USB-C 适配器。

(编者注：当我们的 Metrahit Energy 万用表维修完成后，我们将更新本节内容。不便之处，敬请谅解。）

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.29 / 2.7 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.8 / 12.3 / 33.9 Watt
Load midlight 83.3 / 120.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"		HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"		HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X073N, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"		Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"		MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"		LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Power Consumption
48%
26%
-10%
33%
39%
Idle Minimum *
5.8
4.1
29%
9
-55%
5.2
10%
3
48%
5.5
5%
Idle Average *
12.3
4.5
63%
11.1
10%
14.4
-17%
9.5
23%
7.2
41%
Idle Maximum *
33.9
5.9
83%
16.4
52%
15.4
55%
12
65%
12.9
62%
Load Average *
83.3
51.2
39%
38.3
54%
105.4
-27%
68.3
18%
55
34%
Witcher 3 ultra *
89.1
47.6
47%
34.4
61%
107.6
-21%
59.8
33%
47
47%
Load Maximum *
120.8
90.4
25%
82.5
32%
195.2
-62%
104.8
13%
63.6
47%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø47.6 (36.637-81.59)
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø58.3 (38.257-90.37)
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.81 (4.1231-6.649)

Power Consumption external Monitor

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø73.7 (62.95-91.45)
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø85.7 (85.32-86.07)
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø54.7 (52.961-58.738)
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø43.2 (41.996-50.523)
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.33 (3.888-10.433)

电池寿命

电池续航时间比 iGPU 配置的短是意料之中的，但差异之小令人吃惊。在平衡配置下，我们的实际浏览时间为 11 小时，比 iGPU 设备少了约一个小时。选择 IPS 配置可能会延长运行时间。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
11h 00min
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh		HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 83 Wh		HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng
i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 83 Wh		Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 75 Wh		MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99.9 Wh		LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh
Battery Runtime
9%
-5%
11%
67%
8%
WiFi v1.3
660
717
9%
630
-5%
734
11%
1100
67%
716
8%
H.264
862
671
784
Load
139
95
58
166
121
Reader / Idle
1233
1506

Pros

+ 支持 Windows 动态刷新率（60 至 120 Hz）
+ 图形性能明显快于 Arc 8
+ 高分辨率网络摄像头
+ 非常安静的风扇

Cons

- GeForce RTX 4050 性能低于平均水平
- 重量稍重，电池续航时间稍短
- CPU 性能不佳（将通过更新修复）
- 无 G-Sync

结论 - 功能多样，但性能略有下降

评测中惠普 Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050
评测中惠普 Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050

惠普 Spectre x360 16 是市场上最安静、最便携的 16 英寸可折叠笔记本电脑之一，配备GeForce RTX 4050 独立显卡。该系统专为移动电源用户设计，他们还可以利用二合一外形和 OLED 触摸屏的深 P3 色彩。从这个角度来看，这款机型是成功的。

由于设计轻薄，因此必须在性能上做出妥协。特别是，55 W RTX 4050 GPU 的速度明显低于大多数配备相同显卡的笔记本电脑。当然，就尺寸而言，Spectre x360 16 的速度仍然很快，但由于其 TGP 目标值较低，GeForce GPU 的性能肯定处于较低水平。如果用户希望最大限度地提高性能，或觉得二合一外形不实用，不妨考虑一下 微星威望 16或 Honor MagicBook Pro 16它们可以配置比惠普更高端的 RTX 显卡，同时保留了类似的轻薄设计理念。

Spectre x360 16 是一款高端且做工精良的 16 英寸可折叠电脑。性能总体上非常出色，但如果你愿意放弃二合一设计，肯定还有更快的替代品。

我们还必须提到，在撰写本文时，dGPU 配置的 CPU 性能低于预期。惠普表示正在进行热修复，我们将在修复上线后更新 CPU 部分。除此之外，GPU 的性能似乎正常。

价格和供应情况

惠普现已出货Spectre x360 16 2 合 1 机型，配备GeForce RTX 4050 显卡，IPS 触摸屏起价 1440 美元，OLED 触摸屏起价 1600 美元。

HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 - 03/13/2024 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis
0 / 98 → 0%
Keyboard
87%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
67 / 75 → 90%
Weight
63 / 20-75 → 78%
Battery
89%
Display
90%
Games Performance
92 / 78 → 100%
Application Performance
95 / 85 → 100%
Temperature
90%
Noise
98%
Audio
90 / 91 → 99%
Camera
59 / 85 → 70%
Average
85%
91%
Convertible - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 Spectre x360 16 可折叠电脑评测：现在配备 55 WGeForce RTX 4050 显卡
Allen Ngo, 2024-03-15 (Update: 2024-03-15)