LG gram Pro 二合一 16T90SP 评测--轻巧、功能强大
随着 LG Gram Pro 系列的推出,LG 又为其产品增添了一个新的类别。新款 LG Gram Pro 有 16 英寸和 17 英寸两种尺寸,也有二合一机型。后者就是我们的评测机型。在外壳方面,新产品系列与 LG Gram SuperSlim非常相似。从外观上看,"普通 LG Gram 2-in-1在外观上,"普通 "的 LG Gram 2-in-1 与新产品几乎没有什么共同之处。显示屏也发生了很大变化。虽然到目前为止,LG 一直在其所有笔记本电脑中安装高品质的 IPS 面板,但现在 16 英寸的 LG Gram Pro 配备了 OLED 显示屏。
纤薄的 LG Gram Pro 16 2-in-1 是一款高端设备,其起始上市价格约为 1900 美元。这意味着 Gram 的直接竞争对手是 联想 Yoga 7和 ThinkPad X1, 惠普 Envy, 惠普 Spectre x360以及 三星Galaxy Book4 Pro x360.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.8 % | 06 / 2024 | LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.4 kg | 12.9 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
87.8 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core | 1.7 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
87.2 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.8 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 17.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core | 1.3 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
87 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 18.1 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.7 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | 2.1 kg | 16.99 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和功能
所有 LG Grams 都非常轻薄。近年来,LG Gram 的设计也鲜有变化。去年,LG 让设计部门刮起了变革之风,推出了 LG Gram SuperSlim和 LG Gram Style.LG Gram Pro 系列沿用了 SuperSlim 的大部分设计元素。只有 LG Gram Pro 2 合 1 的端口选择稍微丰富了一些。2 合 1 配备了两个 USB-A 接口和两个 USB-C 接口。HDMI 和一个 3.5 毫米音频插孔完善了连接外部硬件的不同方式。
黑色涂漆的外壳由镁合金制成,这是 Gram 笔记本电脑的典型材质。显示屏表面由玻璃保护。 LG Gram Pro 2 合 1 感觉比 "标准 "Gram 更加稳定。键盘几乎没有弯曲,显示屏也非常坚硬,只能轻微扭曲。这可能主要是玻璃面板的缘故,因为金属外壳非常薄,这也是我们在拧开笔记本时注意到的。
二合一设备的另一个重要因素是铰链。在我们的评测机型中,铰链同样平滑稳定。显示屏的角度可以单手调节,而且始终保持在原位。
维护和保修
LG 为笔记本电脑的所有部件提供两年保修,但不包括充电线,后者只有 12 个月的保修期。
与 LG 笔记本电脑通常的情况一样,要拧开 LG Gram Pro 2 合 1 并不是一件特别容易的事。首先,你必须卸下底座脚垫才能拧下螺丝。我们感觉粘合剂每年都在变强。此外,在取下底座脚垫后,我们还得把尼龙铲刀磨得锋利一些。
五颗 PH0 螺钉固定底座盖。拧下这些螺丝后,就可以撬开底座的四周。 最好从铰链开始。不过,如果没有强力吸盘,你将无法取下底座盖,因为中间也有夹子固定。
在笔记本内部,你会发现一个空闲和一个占用的 M.2 端口,可用于 2280 M.2 NVMe 固态硬盘。Wi-Fi 模块和内存都是焊接的。
输入设备
LG Gram Pro 2 合 1 的键盘非常平整,键程仅有不到一毫米的深度。尽管如此,你还是可以用这款二合一手机打出令人惊叹的好字。背光按键的触感通过一个明显的压力点得到了显著改善。触摸板也能熟练地工作。
触摸屏和触控笔也配合得非常好。使用附带的触控笔时,手掌识别和停用触摸识别功能都能完美地工作。触控笔有一个功能键和橡皮擦键,可以用磁铁吸附在笔记本电脑的各个部位。触控笔还可以在左侧充电,如上图所示,这意味着它不需要电池。
显示屏
LG Gram Pro 2 合 1 提供 2,880 × 1,800 像素。16:10 宽高比的 16 英寸 OLED 显示屏色彩鲜艳逼真。得益于 120 Hz 的刷新率,浏览互联网非常流畅。
不过,与最近评测过的 LG Gram 17 不同,这款新的二合一笔记本电脑的显示屏是亮面的,反光会破坏画面。此外,OLED 面板蓝色子像素之间的距离稍大。视力很好的人或多或少都能看清显示屏上的许多小黑点。
响应时间、色彩空间覆盖率和色彩准确度都符合你对 OLED 面板的期望,所有这些数值都显示出完美的图像。开箱后,显示屏的色彩偏差也非常小。我们最近观察了 LG Gram 17有轻微的蓝色色调。
|
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 398 cd/m²
Contrast: 23647:1 (Black: 0.017 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.67 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.32
ΔE Greyscale 1.27 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP ATNA60CL06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 ATNA60CL09-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G LP160WQ1-SPB2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE ATNA4ßYK20-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G LG Display LP170WQ1-SPF2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 LEN160FHD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 1% | -4% | 2% | -4% | -51% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 99.6 0% | 96.5 -3% | 99.9 0% | 96.3 -4% | 40.9 -59% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 99.7 0% | 61.4 -39% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 92.7 | 96.6 4% | 96.5 4% | 84.6 -9% | 97.6 5% | 85.1 -8% | 42.3 -54% |
Response Times | 44% | 59% | -251% | 44% | -240% | -233% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 14 ? | 0.49 ? 96% | 0.8 ? 94% | 38.4 ? -174% | 0.61 ? 96% | 25 ? -79% | 32.1 ? -129% |
Response Time Black / White * | 5 ? | 0.67 ? 87% | 0.89 ? 82% | 21.4 ? -328% | 0.69 ? 86% | 25 ? -400% | 21.8 ? -336% |
PWM Frequency | 481 | 240 ? -50% | 491.8 ? 2% | 240 ? -50% | |||
Screen | 5% | -35% | -326% | -10% | -321% | -335% | |
Brightness middle | 402 | 387 -4% | 399.4 -1% | 329 -18% | 412 2% | 420 4% | 313.3 -22% |
Brightness | 403 | 392 -3% | 405 0% | 310 -23% | 411 2% | 387 -4% | 294 -27% |
Brightness Distribution | 99 | 98 -1% | 98 -1% | 88 -11% | 98 -1% | 88 -11% | 82 -17% |
Black Level * | 0.017 | 0.39 -2194% | 0.34 -1900% | 0.35 -1959% | |||
Contrast | 23647 | 844 -96% | 1235 -95% | 895 -96% | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.67 | 1 40% | 4.05 -143% | 3.52 -111% | 1.9 -14% | 4.32 -159% | 4.41 -164% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.87 | 1.9 34% | 6.69 -133% | 6.96 -143% | 3.9 -36% | 8.55 -198% | 15.75 -449% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.32 | 1.02 23% | 1.15 13% | 1.9 -44% | 1.27 4% | 1.84 -39% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.27 | 1.7 -34% | 1.1 13% | 5.75 -353% | 1 21% | 8.04 -533% | 4.4 -246% |
Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.27 97% | 2.137 103% | 2.21 100% | 2.224 99% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 6724 97% | 6325 103% | 6419 101% | 7584 86% | 6361 102% | 8114 80% | 7395 88% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 17% /
14% | 8% /
-5% | -194% /
-246% | 12% /
5% | -188% /
-242% | -206% /
-260% |
* ... smaller is better
在完整的 DisplayP3 色彩空间中,LG Gram Pro 2 合 1 重现的色彩偏差很小。我们的信息框 ICC 配置文件仅提供了很小的改进。ΔΕ2000 3 目标值明显低于出厂设置。这也使 2 合 1 适用于专业视频编辑。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.5 ms rise | |
↘ 2.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.5 ms rise | |
↘ 3.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 481 Hz Amplitude: 33 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 481 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 481 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在我们的评测设备中,我们无法检测到通常与 OLED 面板相关的彩虹效果,即使从非常宽的角度观看也是如此。有了这样的视角自由度,在室外使用该设备时甚至可以避免最极端的反光。
性能
制造商和客户对英特尔 Meteor Lake 的需求都很大,但却没有特别多的芯片可供选择。Gram Pro 还配备了 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H.从一开始,这款 APU 就以其强大的 iGPU 和 NPU 给我们留下了深刻的印象。由于采用了全新的 LPE 内核,这款性能卓越的处理器还可以根据需要实现经济运行。LG Gram Pro 2 合 1 的处理器由 16GB 内存支持。这确保了这款笔记本电脑的强大性能,足以胜任从普通办公任务到轻度游戏的所有任务。
测试条件
根据所选的性能配置文件,评测设备的电源管理计划为 45 瓦的提升功率和 35 瓦的持续性能 (PL1)。然而,我们使用 LG Gram Pro 2 合 1 的体验却与此略有不同。即使在高性能模式下,由于温度原因,可用功率往往不超过 30 瓦。
由于在使用普通风扇模式时,LG Gram 仍然很安静,因此我们决定在除游戏外的所有基准测试中都使用这种风扇模式。在游戏中,我们试图通过高风扇模式达到最佳帧率。
处理器
英特尔 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 155H 不仅拥有强大的多核性能,还拥有良好的 iGPU 和 NPU(可加速人工智能应用),给我们留下了深刻印象。通常,我们习惯于看到 LG 的笔记本电脑和二合一笔记本电脑并不具备同类最佳的性能,但全新的 LG Gram Pro 二合一笔记本电脑却让我们大开眼界。英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 在基准测试中表现出色,与最近评测的 LG Gram 17 相比,性能大幅提升(得分也很高)。 LG Gram 17相比,它的性能有了大幅提升(并取得了不错的成绩)。
在普通风扇模式下,这款二合一笔记本电脑往往会迅速减速,正如我们的 Cinebench 循环所显示的那样。需要长时间高性能的用户应选择相应模式。在高冷却模式下,笔记本电脑的性能保持不变。
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP -2! | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 -1! | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9769 - 19007, n=48) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Convertible (616 - 18070, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1496 - 1815, n=48) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average of class Convertible (308 - 1970, n=63, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3798 - 7409, n=46) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average of class Convertible (242 - 6954, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (601 - 696, n=46) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 755, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1932 - 2880, n=52) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (99.6 - 268, n=48) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=62, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Convertible (193 - 1059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (175 - 381, n=44) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (41739 - 70254, n=46) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (4795 - 5621, n=46) | |
Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=60, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (7732 - 13656, n=51) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Average of class Convertible (3257 - 14267, n=39, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1901 - 2473, n=48) | |
Average of class Convertible (1216 - 2696, n=39, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10017 - 13556, n=48) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1462 - 1824, n=48) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average of class Convertible (319 - 2003, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9.93 - 21.2, n=46) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 20.1, n=62, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (37.5 - 79.2, n=45) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=59, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.4457 - 0.53, n=45) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=46) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Average of class Convertible (468 - 25226, n=63, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=46) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average of class Convertible (2644 - 106512, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=46) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average of class Convertible (182 - 4764, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=46) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Convertible (10502 - 120368, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=46) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Convertible (659 - 14835, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=46) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Average of class Convertible (1420 - 56839, n=62, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=46) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Average of class Convertible (1279 - 169089, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=46) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Average of class Convertible (61.4 - 1088, n=62, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=46) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average of class Convertible (254 - 13175, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=46) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average of class Convertible (5136 - 53406, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
系统性能
凭借相对强大的处理器,LG Gram Pro 2 合 1 在系统性能方面也取得了不错的成绩。惠普 Envy 凭借更强大的 iGPU,在 PCMark10 中获得了一些额外的分数。不过,特别是在 Crossmark 中,我们可以看到 LG Gram 与其他二合一设备之间的巨大差异。Gram 的内存和固态硬盘都不是最快的,而 Crossmark 则清楚地凸显了这些差异。
总之,在我们的比较中,所有二合一设备都表现出色。在众多竞争者中,没有一个真正的 "局外人",这意味着在执行基于工作的任务时,没有什么能阻碍我们获得流畅的体验。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5159 - 7529, n=32) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Convertible (1486 - 7963, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Convertible (3975 - 12059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8580 - 11289, n=32) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (7822 - 10591, n=32) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Average of class Convertible (2764 - 10800, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (4985 - 10709, n=32) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Average of class Convertible (811 - 12360, n=59, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=32) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Convertible (310 - 1912, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1291 - 1798, n=31) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average of class Convertible (389 - 1790, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=31) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Average of class Convertible (252 - 2183, n=59, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (939 - 1802, n=31) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average of class Convertible (295 - 1868, n=59, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (252 - 299, n=32) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Convertible (84.2 - 407, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (234 - 309, n=27) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Convertible (49.4 - 314, n=59, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Convertible (407 - 2676, n=63, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (517 - 614, n=33) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6339 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=46) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average of class Convertible (16353 - 108544, n=62, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=46) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average of class Convertible (12706 - 125359, n=62, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=46) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Convertible (10177 - 117920, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (116.2 - 233, n=46) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average of class Convertible (7.4 - 173, n=62, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
LG Gram 的 DPC 延迟不理想,但我们比较的其他二合一产品也没有好到哪里去。只有联想的二合一产品保持在 1000 µs 以下。在评测和使用当前软件配置时,所有其他二合一设备和笔记本电脑在使用实时应用程序时都会出现问题。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
说到读取速度,我们评测设备中的 SK Hynix 固态硬盘属于中游水平。不过,固态硬盘的读取速度相对较高。在我们的连续读取性能测试中,内存往往会在短时间后出现轻微减速,但随后会迅速恢复,继续以未降低的速度运行。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
英特尔 英特尔 8 核 Arc iGPU是市场上速度最快的 iGPU 之一。根据基准或程序的不同,它有时比 AMD Radeon 780M.在 LG Gram 中,这款图形芯片的运行完美无瑕。我们甚至可以说,这是我们评测的第一款 LG 笔记本电脑,其图形性能给我们留下了深刻印象。这意味着这款二合一笔记本电脑在游戏性能方面表现出色。至少在低质量或中等质量设置下,当前大多数游戏都能流畅运行。
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 126535 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7029 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 3667 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3397 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 598 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2526 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average of class Convertible (10 - 123.3, n=49, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 43.1 | |||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 92.1 | 83.2 | 62.6 | 56.8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 45.5 | 28.7 | 19.2 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 49.3 | 31.1 | 29.9 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 30 | 28 | 26 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 146.1 | 67.7 | 54.9 | 40.7 |
F1 23 (2023) | 57.3 | 52.5 | 35.5 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 21 | 16.3 | 15.8 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 23.6 | 14.8 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
LG 的智能助手提供四种风扇配置文件,可根据环境或应用提供所需的噪音水平或性能。在我们的测量中,普通风扇模式的最大噪音为 37 dB(A)。高风扇模式的噪音大约为 4 至 5 分贝(A)。在静音模式下,风扇偶尔转动。不过,在测试过程中,笔记本电脑的噪音为 26 dB(A),并不比室内音量大多少。耳朵贴近 2 合 1 时只能听到轻微的噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.12 / 26.17 / 26.17 dB(A) |
Load |
| 36.33 / 41.61 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.12 dB(A) |
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02 | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02 | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 4% | 12% | 5% | 4% | -5% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 25.12 | 24.1 4% | 22.9 9% | 25.1 -0% | 23.2 8% | 24.5 2% | 24.95 1% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.12 | 24.1 4% | 23 8% | 25.1 -0% | 23.6 6% | 24.5 2% | 24.95 1% |
Idle Average * | 26.17 | 24.1 8% | 23 12% | 25.1 4% | 23.6 10% | 28 -7% | 24.95 5% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.17 | 26.4 -1% | 23 12% | 26.1 -0% | 25 4% | 29.8 -14% | 25.3 3% |
Load Average * | 36.33 | 35.2 3% | 23.8 34% | 31.4 14% | 34.8 4% | 41.7 -15% | 38.54 -6% |
Load Maximum * | 41.61 | 39.2 6% | 43.8 -5% | 36.6 12% | 46.2 -11% | 41.7 -0% | 32 23% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.5 | 43.8 | 41.1 | 37.7 | 41.7 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
到目前为止,我们已经观察到这款笔记本电脑功能相对强大、安静且轻薄。但是,处理器和其他硬件散发的热量总得有个去处。看来,过多的热量是通过机箱散发的。在使用 Fluke t3000 进行的压力测试中,我们测得 LG Gram Pro 2 合 1 底座的温度高达 55.4 °C。不过,这只是 2 合 1 机型顶部和底座的一小部分区域发热。相比之下,在中等负载情况下,笔记本电脑的发热量并不高。值得补充的是,Gram 的黑色哑光涂层确保 FlirOne Pro 无法显示准确的温度。因此,下面的发热图像仅供参考。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.4 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 22.5 °C / 72.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+5.6 °C / 10.1 F).
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 10% | -0% | -22% | 6% | 2% | 10% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 34.5 | 38.6 -12% | 42.6 -23% | 55 -59% | 42.9 -24% | 40.1 -16% | 37.8 -10% |
Maximum Bottom * | 55.4 | 39.2 29% | 47.8 14% | 55.4 -0% | 43.6 21% | 42.9 23% | 38.8 30% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28.7 | 25.2 12% | 27.4 5% | 34.9 -22% | 24.4 15% | 26.8 7% | 25.4 11% |
Idle Bottom * | 28.7 | 25.7 10% | 27.8 3% | 30 -5% | 24.9 13% | 31.1 -8% | 26.8 7% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
评测设备的扬声器也令人印象深刻。我们注意到它的音质非常出色,只是中音过于突出,稍稍破坏了音质。
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 11.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
我们的评测设备配备了 USB-C 电源,最大功率可达 65 瓦。LG Gram Pro 2 合 1 并没有将其使用到最后一瓦。我们使用普通风扇模式记录了功率测量结果,并在此观察到了节流的后果。CPU 会周期性地降低功耗,以保持指定的温度限制。
Off / Standby | 0.403 / 0.833 Watt |
Idle | 6 / 7.5 / 8.2 Watt |
Load |
45.2 / 61.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
在我们的 Wi-Fi 上网测试中,Gram Pro 电池容量为 77 Wh,运行时间大大超过了 9 小时。三星 三星Galaxy Book4 Pro x360 和我们的评测设备在电池续航时间方面差别不大。在我们的对比中,所有的二合一电脑和笔记本电脑,除了 Thinkpad X1的电池容量在 70 Wh 到 80 Wh 之间。从最近评测的 Gram 设备和 Yoga 7.去年的 LG Gram 17和 LG Gram 2-in-1在远离墙壁的地方有更好的续航能力。这些设备使用的是 IPS 显示屏。
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 77 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, 76 Wh | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, 57 Wh | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 77 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 71 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 2% | -3% | 22% | -12% | 49% | 27% | 8% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 581 | 531 -9% | 459 -21% | 716 23% | 509 -12% | 918 58% | 738 27% | 594 ? 2% |
Load | 101 | 114 13% | 116 15% | 121 20% | 89 -12% | 140 39% | 114.9 ? 14% | |
H.264 | 881 | 540 | 773 ? | |||||
Reader / Idle | 935 | 1344 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决
LG 认真对待了新款 LG Gram Pro 2 合 1 名称中的 "Pro"。我们可以看到,与 LG 的普通 Gram 2 合 1 相比,这款 2 合 1 在动力和软技能方面都有了明显的改进。 Gram 2 合 1.这款评测设备凭借良好的音质、出色的显示屏和出色的电池续航能力从众多产品中脱颖而出。与此同时,LG Gram Pro 2 合 1 还做到了轻巧时尚。三星Galaxy Book4 Pro x360 面临着严峻的竞争。
随着新款 Gram Pro 的推出,LG 正在走出性能低谷,而性能低谷往往是决定不选择 Gram 的一个原因。现在,我们不得不修改之前对 LG Gram 2 合 1 的评价。LG 制造出了一款具有高性能的轻型机器,并再次在轻型笔记本电脑中占据了一席之地。
LG 认真对待 Pro 这个名字,并推出了一款二合一产品,与标准版 Gram 相比有了很大的提升。LG Gram Pro 2 合 1 做到了纤薄、强大、安静,主要是酷。
Gram Pro 2-in-1 配备的全新英特尔流星湖处理器无疑是该设备成功的关键。但是,LG 做了大量的工作,重复了往年熟悉的套路。LG 的 2 合 1 可能是三星Galaxy Book4 Pro x360 的杀手锏,因为它的性能相当,有时甚至更好。联想目前在其 Yoga 7 或 Yoga 9 系列设备中还没有配备 Core Ultra der H 系列的 16 英寸二合一设备。
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP
- 06/20/2024 v8
Marc Herter
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.