Notebookcheck Logo

惠普Pavilion Plus 14 Core i7 评测：英特尔 Raptor Lake 还是 AMD Zen 4？选择一目了然

外面有英特尔更好。

搭载英特尔酷睿 i7-1355U 处理器的惠普Pavilion Plus 14 配备了与 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U 型号相同的配置，包括 2.8K IMAX 增强型 OLED 显示屏和 500 万像素网络摄像头，同时还增加了一个雷电 4 端口。不过，相似之处也仅此而已，我们的评测发现，英特尔和 AMD 两款产品的性能差距简直是天壤之别。
Laptop / Notebook Intel Raptor Lake Intel Evo Zen 4
HPPavilion Plus 14 Core i7

惠普新推出的Pavilion Plus 系列似乎击中了正确的音符。我们之前评测过 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U-动力 Pavilion Plus 14现在我们将目光转向其基于英特尔的同胞兄弟。

目前惠普Pavilion Plus 14 的配置基于 英特尔酷睿 i7-1355U并配备 16 GB LPDDR5x 内存和 1 TB PCIe NVMe 存储。

这两款Pavilion Plus 14 具有众多共同属性，包括 "IMAX 增强型 "2.8K 120 Hz HDR OLED 显示屏。因此，在本次评测中，我们将主要关注两个版本之间的性能差异。

我们的配置在印度的官方售价为 99,999 ₹，但通过各种银行和银行卡优惠，售价约为 90,000 ₹。在美国，这款产品目前在惠普官方商店的折扣价为 1019.99 美元。

HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU (Pavilion Plus Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-1355U 10 x 1.2 - 5 GHz, 41 W PL2 / Short Burst, 25 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-U
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 31.0.101.4900
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5x-5200 Quad-Channel, Timings: 60-48-48-112
Display
14.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 243 PPI, Samsung SDC4197, OLED, IMAX Enhanced, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, 1024 GB 
, 905 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH - cAVS
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo audio jack, Sensors: IR sensor
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17.5 x 314 x 227
Battery
68 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4-cell
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: HP Wide Vision webcam with manual shutter
Primary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2x Stereo speakers with B&O tuning, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, HP Support Assistant, myHP, HP Smart, HP PC Hardware Diagnostics, HP Enhanced Lighting, Omen Gaming Hub, Omen Light Studio, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.44 kg, Power Supply: 225 g
Price
1020 USD
Links
HP homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
87.5 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		1.4 kg17.5 mm14.00"2880x1800
87.8 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M		1.4 kg18.8 mm14.00"2880x1800
from EUR 920
88.9 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U
i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		1.4 kg16.9 mm14.00"1920x1200
85.6 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs		1.3 kg14.9 mm14.00"2880x1800
from EUR 769
91.5 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X
i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		1 kg17.6 mm14.00"2880x1800
from EUR 2500
89.6 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		1.3 kg15.6 mm14.20"3120x2080
Alternative specs USD 1,999.90
HPPavilion Plus 14 Core i7
HPPavilion Plus 14 Core i7
HPPavilion Plus 14 Core i7
HPPavilion Plus 14 Core i7
HPPavilion Plus 14 Core i7
HPPavilion Plus 14 Core i7
HPPavilion Plus 14 Core i7
HPPavilion Plus 14 Core i7
HPPavilion Plus 14 Core i7
HPPavilion Plus 14 Core i7：键盘和触摸板
HPPavilion Plus 14 Core i7：内部结构

尺寸比较

❌
317.5 mm 226.9 mm 16.9 mm 1.4 kg314 mm 227 mm 18.8 mm 1.4 kg314 mm 227 mm 17.5 mm 1.4 kg311 mm 215 mm 17.6 mm 1 kg312.9 mm 217.9 mm 14.9 mm 1.3 kg310 mm 221 mm 15.6 mm 1.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性雷电 4 和稳定的 Wi-Fi 6E 速度

Pavilion Plus 14 的端口选择还算不错。英特尔机型比 AMD 机型多了一个 Thunderbolt 4 端口，而 AMD 机型只有一个 USB 3.2 Type-C 端口。

由于没有专用的直流输入端口，因此插入电源适配器时，其中一个 Type-C 端口将被占用。

英特尔 Wi-Fi 6E AX211 无线局域网卡显示出相对稳定的传输速率
英特尔 Wi-Fi 6E AX211 无线局域网卡显示出相对稳定的传输速率

作为一款采用英特尔 Evo 设计的产品，Pavilion Plus 14 自然配备了英特尔 Wi-Fi 6E AX211 无线局域网卡。与 AMD SKU 所使用的联发科 Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 相比，该卡在性能上具有明显优势，特别是在与我们的参考机型华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器配对进行的 iPerf3 接收测试中。

6 GHz 频段只能提供微弱的吞吐量提升，但我们注意到这里的传输速度更稳定，不会出现 5 GHz 频段的性能下降。

左：3.5 毫米组合音频插孔，USB Type-A 5 Gbps
左：3.5 毫米组合音频插孔，USB Type-A 5 Gbps
右侧USB Type-C 10 Gbps（DisplayPort 1.4 输出，电源传输）、Thunderbolt 4（DisplayPort 1.4 输出，电源传输）、HDMI 2.1 输出、USB Type-A 10 Gbps
右侧USB Type-C 10 Gbps（DisplayPort 1.4 输出，电源传输）、Thunderbolt 4（DisplayPort 1.4 输出，电源传输）、HDMI 2.1 输出、USB Type-A 10 Gbps
Networking: iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | iperf3 receive AXE11000 | iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1620 (832min - 1736max) MBit/s
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1597 (1441min - 1721max) MBit/s -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1449 (746min - 1638max) MBit/s -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (358 - 1978, n=74, last 2 years)
1384 MBit/s -15%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (64 - 1921, n=251)
1230 MBit/s -24%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
858 (430min - 896max) MBit/s -47%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
829 (600min - 998max) MBit/s -49%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
591 (549min - 636max) MBit/s -64%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1612 (840-1671)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1587 (1395-1789)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1623 (1609-1636)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1314 (1278-1343)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1592 (832-1736)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1597 (1441-1721)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1662 (1418-1683)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1248 (1007-1476)

网络摄像头

与 AMD 版本不同的是，我们使用默认的 Windows 摄像头应用程序以 500 万像素拍摄照片时没有任何问题。与大多数配备 720p 或 1080p 网络摄像头的笔记本电脑相比，图像质量有了很大提高。

我们的测试图显示了丰富的细节和足够的清晰度，但色彩准确度还有待提高。手动物理网络摄像头快门可增加私密性。捆绑的 HP Enhanced Camera 和 HP Enhanced Lighting 应用程序为视频会议提供了更多生活质量功能。

ColorChecker
15.5 ∆E
16 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
20 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU: 16.64 ∆E min: 2.53 - max: 23.68 ∆E

安全

Pavilion Plus 14 配备了 TPM 2.0 模块，符合 Windows 11 的安全要求。红外摄像头可进行基于 Windows Hello 的面部识别。遗憾的是，这款笔记本电脑没有配备肯辛顿锁插槽。

配件和保修

标准包装内有一个 65 瓦的电源适配器和常见的文件，没有任何附件。

惠普为Pavilion Plus 14 在印度提供标准的一年保修服务。购买者还可以选择符合条件的惠普保修后护理包和意外损坏保护，保修期从一年（10,763 ₹）到三年（下一工作日现场保修最高可达 14,459 ₹）不等。

显示屏：2.8K "IMAX 增强 "OLED，带 HDR 和 120 Hz PWM

子像素矩阵
子像素矩阵

搭载酷睿 i7 处理器的Pavilion Plus 14 采用 2880 x 1800 14 英寸 OLED 面板，刷新率为 120 Hz，峰值 HDR 亮度为 500 尼特。这为用户带来了主观上身临其境的观看体验，而较高的纵横比则旨在体现笔记本电脑的 "IMAX Enhanced "品牌形象。

选择酷睿 i5 机型的用户可以选择 FHD+ 或 QHD+ 分辨率。

HDR 峰值亮度
HDR 峰值亮度

惠普宣称 SDR 的峰值亮度为 400 尼特，我们的测试验证了这一数字，最大亮度为 392 尼特。HDR 的表现更好，峰值亮度超过了 606 尼特。

面板显示出 97% 的出色亮度均匀性和近乎无限的对比度。由于这是一款 OLED 面板，因此不会出现背光渗漏。

392
cd/m²		386
cd/m²		383
cd/m²
392
cd/m²		387
cd/m²		382
cd/m²
389
cd/m²		388
cd/m²		384
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Samsung SDC4197 tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3
Maximum: 392 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 387 cd/m² Minimum: 18.39 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 386 cd/m²
Contrast: 38700:1 (Black: 0.01 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87, calibrated: 1.6
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
92.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"		HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"		Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Samsung ATNA40YK11-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"		Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X
ATNA40YK07-1 SDC4171, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"		Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U
B140UAK01.2, IPS, 1920x1200, 14"		Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
TMX1422, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2"
Display
2%
2%
1%
-51%
-6%
Display P3 Coverage
97.9
99.8
2%
99.9
2%
99.9
2%
39.9
-59%
89.8
-8%
sRGB Coverage
99.6
100
0%
100
0%
100
0%
59.7
-40%
99.4
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
92.1
95.8
4%
95.4
4%
93.6
2%
41.2
-55%
84.2
-9%
Response Times
168%
120%
120%
-114%
43280%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
10.8 ?(9.4, 1.4)
0.82 ?(0.43, 0.39)
92%
1.85 ?(2, 1.7)
83%
2 ?(1, 1)
81%
27.7 ?(12.2, 15.5)
-156%
20 ?(6, 14)
-85%
Response Time Black / White *
9.29 ?(8.79, 0.5)
0.95 ?(0.44, 0.51)
90%
2 ?(2, 2)
78%
2 ?(1, 1)
78%
15.9 ?(8.1, 7.8)
-71%
7 ?(2, 5)
25%
PWM Frequency
120 ?(100)
504.7 ?(100)
321%
357 ?(100)
198%
360 ?(100)
200%
156000 ?(50)
129900%
Screen
-8%
-78%
-60%
-545%
-276%
Brightness middle
387
384
-1%
278
-28%
389.9
1%
322.5
-17%
595
54%
Brightness
387
386
0%
279
-28%
390
1%
296
-24%
550
42%
Brightness Distribution
97
98
1%
96
-1%
99
2%
85
-12%
85
-12%
Black Level *
0.01
0.04
-300%
0.0497
-397%
0.44
-4300%
0.25
-2400%
Contrast
38700
6950
-82%
7845
-80%
733
-98%
2380
-94%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.03
4.06
-100%
3.01
-48%
2.22
-9%
3.72
-83%
2.01
1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.86
6.73
-74%
4.43
-15%
3.75
3%
14.68
-280%
6.9
-79%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.6
0.49
69%
4.14
-159%
1.9
-19%
1.22
24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
1.1
52%
3.2
-39%
2.4
-4%
4
-74%
2.74
-19%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.26 97%
2.194 100%
2.187 101%
2.29 96%
2.4 92%
CCT
6523 100%
6331 103%
6126 106%
6426 101%
6064 107%
6319 103%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
54% / 35%
15% / -22%
20% / -9%
-237% / -378%
14333% / 8489%

* ... smaller is better

该显示器覆盖了近 100% 的 sRGB 和 Display P3 色彩空间，以及 92.1% 的 Adobe RGB 色彩空间。这使它非常适合媒体编辑和消费。

对比 sRGB：99.6% 覆盖率
对比 sRGB：99.6% 覆盖率
对比 Adobe RGB：92.1% 覆盖率
对比 Adobe RGB：92.1% 覆盖率
对比显示屏 P3：97.9%覆盖率
对比显示屏 P3：97.9%覆盖率

开箱即用的色彩再现效果不错，灰度和 ColorChecker Delta E 2000 的平均值分别约为 2.3 和 2.03。

我们使用肖像显示器公司提供的 X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3 分光光度计和 Calman Ultimate 软件进行校准，进一步将相应值提高到 0.8 和 1.6。

校准前的灰度
校准前的灰度
校准前的 ColorChecker
校准前的 ColorChecker
校准前的饱和扫频
校准前的饱和扫频
校准后的灰度
校准后的灰度
校准后的 ColorChecker
校准后的 ColorChecker
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的饱和扫频

我们的校准 ICC 文件可从上面的链接下载。

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
9.29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.79 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.4 ms rise
↘ 1.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

响应时间尚可，但可以做得更好。我们不得不手动估算 50% 灰色到 80% 灰色的响应时间，因为该模式显示出异常陡峭的下降。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8492 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在刷新率为 120 Hz 时，PWM 可在 120 Hz 或其倍数之间振荡，最高可达 480 Hz。在相应的刷新率下，PWM 下降到 60 赫兹。

无论如何，PWM 频率都偏低，可能会给对其敏感的用户带来困扰。

0% 亮度 480.05 Hz PWM
0% 亮度 480.05 Hz PWM
10% 亮度： 479.64 赫兹 PWM
10% 亮度： 479.64 赫兹 PWM
25% 亮度： 120.47 Hz PWM
25% 亮度： 120.47 Hz PWM
50% 亮度： 480.01 赫兹 PWM
50% 亮度： 480.01 赫兹 PWM
75% 亮度 479.94 赫兹 PWM
75% 亮度 479.94 赫兹 PWM
100% 亮度：60 赫兹 PWM（60 赫兹刷新率）
100% 亮度：60 赫兹 PWM（60 赫兹刷新率）

查看我们的入门指南为什么 PWM 如此令人头疼"了解更多信息。在我们的 PWM 排名表.

光亮的显示屏在阳光直射下会让人感到不适。可视角度相当稳定，在极端情况下不会出现明显的亮度或色彩损失。

阳光下的户外观赏
阳光下的户外观赏
树荫下的户外观景
树荫下的户外观景
稳定的视角
稳定的视角

性能不敌基于 Ryzen 7 7840U 的Pavilion Plus 14

惠普提供两种型号的Pavilion Plus 14 酷睿 i5-1335U和酷睿 i7-1355U 两种选择。myHP 应用程序只提供平衡电源配置文件，因此我们使用 Windows 电源管理设置为最佳性能来进行所有基准测试。

酷睿 i7-1355U 是一款 10 核（2P+8E）12 线程部件，在本设备中的 PL1 工作功耗为 25 W，PL2 为 41 W。

 
 

处理器

Pavilion Plus 14 的酷睿 i7-1355U 在与 Ryzen 7 7840U 的较量中不落下风
Pavilion Plus 14 的酷睿 i7-1355U 在与 Ryzen 7 7840U 的较量中不落下风

Pavilion Plus 14 Core i7 在整体 CPU 基准测试中大大落后于搭载 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U 的同类产品。这在意料之中，因为酷睿 i7-1355U 只提供了两个带超线程的 P 核心，其余都是 E 核心。

尽管 Core i7-1355U 的单核成绩通常与 8C/16T Ryzen 7 7840U 相当或略微领先，但这取决于基准测试。

与 Core i7-1355U 的平均成绩相比，我们的评测样本累计落后 8%。较低的 PL2 也使Pavilion Plus 14 略微处于劣势，尤其是在多核方面，与华硕 ExpertBook B9 相比，后者使用相同的芯片，但功耗限制更高。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU Intel Core i7-1355U: Ø884 (855.52-1252.31)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø1746 (1507.22-1962.23)
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U Intel Core i7-1365U: Ø1122 (1097.76-1428.93)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 Intel Core i5-1335U: Ø1179 (1105.64-1379.98)
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X Intel Core i7-1355U: Ø1148 (1115.36-1328.11)
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1613 (1476.83-1993.62)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Multimedia
 
82.3 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
73 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P
72.7 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U
Intel Core i7-1365U
65.3 pt
Average Intel Core i7-1355U
 
61 pt
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X
Intel Core i7-1355U
57.6 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
55.7 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
54.7 pt

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
240 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
93 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1252 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2972 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
660 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1740 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
6936 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
102 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
398 Points
Help

在运行 Cinebench R15 多核循环时，CPU 的各种参数显示，酷睿 i7-1355U 的峰值主频为 3.83 GHz，功耗为 42.2 W。

Pavilion Plus 14 插电时默认为最佳性能，电池供电时默认为平衡配置文件。出于某种原因，酷睿 i7-1355U 在电池供电时的 Cinebench 显示结果很奇怪，与最佳性能模式相比，它似乎更倾向于平衡模式。

因此，虽然 Cinebench R20 的单核性能下降了约 24%，但有趣的是，多核性能却在电池供电时提高了 3%。我们在多次运行 Cinebench R23 后也观察到了同样的异常结果。

Cinebench R15 循环期间的 CPU 时钟、封装功率和内核温度
Cinebench R15 循环期间的 CPU 时钟、封装功率和内核温度
Cinebench R20 多核跑分显示电池电量略有上升
Cinebench R20 多核跑分显示电池电量略有上升
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
92 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
90.9 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
71 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U
Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
53.1 pt
Average Intel Core i7-1355U
 
50.7 pt
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
49 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
45.6 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
44 pt

查看我们的专用 英特尔酷睿 i7-1355U页面，了解更多信息和性能比较。

系统性能

基于 AMD 的Pavilion Plus 14 在 PCMark 10 总分上领先酷睿 i7 版本 19%。不过，在 CrossMark 的累积测试中，两款设备几乎打成平手。总体而言，Pavilion Plus 14 在满足日常计算和网页浏览需求方面没有任何问题。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Multimedia
  (4325 - 8670, n=67, last 2 years)
6828 Points +25%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
6480 Points +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U
5980 Points +10%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5723 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (5455 - 5933, n=15)
5716 Points +5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
5672 Points +4%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5455 Points
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
5328 Points -2%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5169 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3115 points
PCMark 10 Score
5455 points
Help

DPC 延迟

DPC 延迟时间优于Pavilion Plus 14 的一些竞争对手，包括 AMD 变体、联想 ThinkPad T14s 联想 ThinkPad T14s和 华为 MateBook X Pro但仍然偏高。

播放 YouTube 4K 视频时的 LatencyMon
播放 YouTube 4K 视频时的 LatencyMon
Prime95 压力后的 LatencyMon
Prime95 压力后的 LatencyMon
Windows 内核模式驱动程序框架显示的执行时间最长
Windows 内核模式驱动程序框架显示的执行时间最长
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
6070.1 μs * -242%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
4224.8 μs * -138%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U
2848.5 μs * -61%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1774 μs *
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
986 μs * +44%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
473.1 μs * +73%

* ... smaller is better

我们的 DPC 延迟排名页面提供了经审核设备的 LatencyMon 测量读数概览。

存储设备

Pavilion Plus 14 的 SK Hynix 固态硬盘不是我们见过的同类产品中速度最快的
Pavilion Plus 14 的 SK Hynix 固态硬盘不是我们见过的同类产品中速度最快的

Pavilion Plus 14 配备了 SK Hynix PC801 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD。累计性能比该硬盘记录的平均成绩慢了约 26%，但与 AMD 版笔记本电脑使用的 WDC PC SN810 不相上下。

硬盘性能相对稳定，但我们在队列深度为 8 的 DiskSpd 读取循环测试中观察到，运行 20 次后速度明显下降。

内部存储空间无法进一步扩展。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6134 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3289 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 458.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 311.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4875 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3002 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 74.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 153.6 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 343 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 614.4 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
 
84.2 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
75.4 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
 
73.5 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl -11!
WDC PC SN810 1TB
66.3 pt
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
65.2 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
64.4 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
63.3 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U
 
58.1 pt

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

03256509751300162519502275260029253250357539004225455048755200552558506175Tooltip
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4259 (3371.17-6487.78)

更多存储基准可在我们的 固态硬盘比较页面.

图形处理器性能

Pavilion Plus 14 依靠集成的 Iris Xe Graphics 96 EUs 来驱动视觉效果。累积 3DMark 性能与其他采用该 iGPU 的笔记本电脑类似。

不过，英特尔版本的性能要比搭载 AMD 处理器的Pavilion Plus 14 差远了，因为后者配备了更出色的 Radeon 780MiGPU 性能高出 33%。在 3DMark 11 Performance GPU 等测试中，Radeon 780M 的性能提升高达 86%。

GPU-Z：英特尔 Iris Xe 图形处理器 96 EUs
GPU-Z：英特尔 Iris Xe 图形处理器 96 EUs
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia
 
100 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl -1!
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
47.7 pt
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
39.3 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
39.3 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
38.6 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1365U
38.3 pt
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
36 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
32.2 pt
3DMark 11 Performance
6907 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
128665 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
21922 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
4926 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
2398 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1753 points
Help
Blender - v3.3 Classroom CPU
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
946 Seconds *
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
761 Seconds * +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1365U
753 Seconds * +20%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
737 Seconds * +22%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (336 - 1259, n=104)
690 Seconds * +27%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
537 Seconds * +43%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
503 Seconds * +47%
Average of class Multimedia
  (160 - 1042, n=77, last 2 years)
424 Seconds * +55%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

Pavilion Plus 14 并不是一款游戏笔记本。Iris Xe 图形处理器只能运行昔日的游戏，而且最多只能在中低设置下运行。

尽管设置很低，但 iGPU 仍能在 1080p 超高速运行TheWitcher 3 时保持相对稳定的帧率。

Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia
 
100 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
47.9 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
41.4 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U
Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
35.7 pt
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
33.6 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
31.5 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
31.1 pt

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

01234567891011121314Tooltip
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø13.3 (10-14)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 88.5 74.3 22 9.38
The Witcher 3 (2015) 73.5 50.8 28 13.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 97.7 71.7 55.2 47.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 40.6 23.7 16.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 37.1 25.6 23
Far Cry 5 (2018) 40 24 23 21
Strange Brigade (2018) 88.3 38.1 30.6 23.4
F1 22 (2022) 37.6 33.5 25.4 19.1

查看我们的 Intel Iris Xe 图形 96 EUs页面了解更多信息。

排放：表面温度低，负载情况下风扇噪音小

系统噪音

基于英特尔技术的Pavilion Plus 14 的风扇在日常使用中几乎听不到噪音。即使在负载情况下，风扇噪音也仅在 32 分贝（A）左右。在使用过程中，我们没有注意到任何线圈啸叫或来自机箱的杂音。

Noise Level

Idle
20.57 / 20.57 / 20.57 dB(A)
Load
32.18 / 32.26 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 19.35 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2016.312.52520.315.33116.614.6401012.65017.614.76314.7188015.22110020.823.212518.119.516012.112.820019.91825015.917.631516.617.740014.717.550010.618.36307.517.68006.817.410006.118.112505.719.416005.618.820006.218.425004.42031503.321.74000320.750003.223.963002.723.48000318.910000316125002.811.71600028.8SPL19.432.3N0.21.6median 6.1median 18.3Delta61.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N		HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB		Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U		Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014		Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR		Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
Noise
-20%
-10%
-25%
-22%
-30%
off / environment *
19.35
23.4
-21%
23.2
-20%
24.9
-29%
24.9
-29%
25.4
-31%
Idle Minimum *
20.57
24.1
-17%
23.2
-13%
24.9
-21%
24.9
-21%
25.4
-23%
Idle Average *
20.57
24.1
-17%
23.2
-13%
24.9
-21%
24.9
-21%
25.4
-23%
Idle Maximum *
20.57
25.3
-23%
23.6
-15%
24.9
-21%
24.9
-21%
29.6
-44%
Load Average *
32.18
33.4
-4%
24.3
24%
31.9
1%
33
-3%
42
-31%
Witcher 3 ultra *
29.44
39.4
-34%
35.7
-21%
43.2
-47%
Load Maximum *
32.26
39.4
-22%
35.7
-11%
43.2
-34%
45
-39%
40.9
-27%

* ... smaller is better

温度

单风扇单热管组合似乎足以维持可控的表面温度。我们记录到的最大热点温度为 39 °C，位于底部机箱最左侧，当时正在使用 1080p 超高清 Witcher 3 。

无论负载如何，触摸板和掌托区域都保持凉爽。

Pavilion Plus 14 采用单风扇单热管冷却系统
Pavilion Plus 14 采用单风扇单热管冷却系统
Max. Load
 32.4 °C36.6 °C36.6 °C 
 29.8 °C34 °C35.2 °C 
 27.6 °C29.4 °C31.2 °C 
Maximum: 36.6 °C
Average: 32.5 °C
37.2 °C36.4 °C29.6 °C
33.4 °C32.6 °C28.2 °C
30.2 °C28.6 °C27.4 °C
Maximum: 37.2 °C
Average: 31.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  34.2 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Amprobe TMD-50 // Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.4 °C / -4.4 F).
系统闲置 - 返回顶部
系统闲置 - 返回顶部
系统闲置 - 底部
系统闲置 - 底部
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 - 上衣
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 - 上衣
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 - 底部
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 - 底部
Witcher 3 压力 - 返回页首
Witcher 3 压力 - 返回页首
Witcher 3 压力 - 底部
Witcher 3 压力 - 底部
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs		HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M		Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U
Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs		Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs		Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs		Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat
8%
9%
-5%
-27%
-17%
Maximum Upper Side *
36.6
39
-7%
39.8
-9%
44.8
-22%
48.8
-33%
46.5
-27%
Maximum Bottom *
37.2
35.8
4%
35.2
5%
34.8
6%
56.5
-52%
44.7
-20%
Idle Upper Side *
31.6
25.2
20%
25.6
19%
30.7
3%
33.3
-5%
34.9
-10%
Idle Bottom *
30
25.6
15%
24.4
19%
32.5
-8%
35
-17%
32.9
-10%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

使用 Prime95 就地大型 FFT 对Pavilion Plus 14 进行的压力测试表明，酷睿 i7-1355U 的峰值封装功耗为 42 W，频率提升高达 2.85 GHz。不过，在测试过程中，这些值分别稳定在 18.5 W 和 1.74 GHz 的平均值。

在加入 FurMark 后，集成的 Iris Xe Graphics 可以瞬间使用 20.3 W 的功率并将频率提升到 1,300 MHz，但总体功率不能超过 4 W。不过，在 1080p 超高速运行 Witcher 3 时，iGPU 的 功耗为 9.23 W，平均频率可提升至 1,177 MHz。

压力测试 CPU 时钟 (GHz) GPU 时钟 (MHz) CPU 平均温度 (°C) GPU 平均温度(°C)
系统空闲 1.16 300 43 46
Prime95 1.55 300 73 62
Prime95 + FurMark 1.07 450 63 64
Witcher 3 1080p Ultra 3.53 1,300 58 66
Prime95 压力期间的 CPU/GPU 时钟、温度和功耗变化
Prime95 压力期间的 CPU/GPU 时钟、温度和功耗变化
Prime95 + FurMark 压力下的 CPU/GPU 时钟、温度和功耗变化
Prime95 + FurMark 压力下的 CPU/GPU 时钟、温度和功耗变化
Witcher 3 压力期间的 CPU/GPU 时钟、温度和功耗变化
Witcher 3 压力期间的 CPU/GPU 时钟、温度和功耗变化

发言人

Pavilion Plus 14 的 B&O 调谐立体声扬声器能为一个普通大小的房间提供足够的响度，但低于其搭载 AMD 处理器的同类产品。低音输出不足，但中高音再现良好。

如果希望获得更好的音效，可以使用 3.5 毫米音频接口或蓝牙 5.3。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2016.313.62520.315.13116.612401010.15017.613.16314.718.28015.220.610020.830.812518.136.616012.143.320019.951.625015.955.931516.656.340014.759.550010.660.76307.560.98006.863.610006.160.912505.764.316005.669.520006.27025004.469.331503.366.64000369.450003.266.963002.760.38000362.510000361.5125002.862.216000262.4SPL19.478.6N0.241.9median 6.1median 61.5Delta65.326.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TUApple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理：节约用电，电池寿命长

耗电量

英特尔和 AMDPavilion Plus 14s 的功耗总体上差不多。不过，由于 Radeon 780M的性能更强，AMD 版在 1080p Ultra 下的 Witcher 3 功耗要高出 18%。

Pavilion Plus 14 酷睿 i7 在空闲状态下的耗电量极低，这使它与华硕 ExpertBook B9 相比具有明显优势。随附的 65 W 电源适配器足以在压力下为笔记本供电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.26 / 2.13 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 6.7 / 7.16 / 11.17 Watt
Load midlight 46.5 / 64.36 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"		HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"		Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U
i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, IPS, 1920x1200, 14"		Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"		Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X
i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"		Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2"		Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 		Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
1%
14%
-3%
-18%
-8%
-0%
-41%
Idle Minimum *
6.7
6
10%
3.1
54%
6.79
-1%
4.9
27%
4.1
39%
5.41 ?(2.2 - 46.5, n=196)
19%
6.65 ?(2.1 - 31.3, n=79, last 2 years)
1%
Idle Average *
7.16
6.5
9%
6.5
9%
6.83
5%
12.5
-75%
6.6
8%
8.6 ?(3.8 - 63, n=196)
-20%
11.4 ?(4.6 - 38.3, n=79, last 2 years)
-59%
Idle Maximum *
11.17
13.9
-24%
7.9
29%
10.5
6%
16.8
-50%
8
28%
10.9 ?(5.8 - 68.9, n=196)
2%
13.2 ?(6 - 41.6, n=79, last 2 years)
-18%
Load Average *
46.5
41.9
10%
40
14%
45.9
1%
43.8
6%
61
-31%
45.4 ?(12.5 - 87.3, n=196)
2%
70.3 ?(15.1 - 147, n=76, last 2 years)
-51%
Witcher 3 ultra *
37.2
43.9
-18%
43.2
-16%
45.6
-23%
41.2
-11%
56
-51%
Load Maximum *
64.36
50.8
21%
69
-7%
69.8
-8%
68.1
-6%
90
-40%
67.6 ?(30.1 - 123.3, n=196)
-5%
115.5 ?(40 - 270, n=79, last 2 years)
-79%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø46.5 (36.5-54.1)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø44.7 (38.8-64.4)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø37.2 (33-51.9)

Power Consumption: External monitor

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø29.5 (24.8-64.1)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø40.4 (26.9-63.3)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU; Cinebench R20 Single (external Monitor): Ø27.6 (21.9-43.1)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU; Cinebench R20 Multi (external Monitor): Ø31 (25.3-58.7)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø27 (22-54.3)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø32.8 (25.5-59)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø28.3 (23.8-43)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø28.1 (25-48.8)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.37 (6.7-9.14)

电池寿命

68 瓦时的电池提供了良好的运行时间，可以轻松支撑一个典型的工作日。在 150 尼特的条件下，我们的标准网页浏览脚本可实现近 9 小时 40 分钟的运行时间，H.264 1080p 播放可实现 12 小时的运行时间。

68 瓦时电池可提供较长的运行时间
68 瓦时电池可提供较长的运行时间
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
9h 38min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
7h 13min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 00min
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 68 Wh		HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh		Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U
i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh		Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 54.6 Wh		Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X
i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 63 Wh		Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh		Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
-12%
-18%
-22%
-5%
-14%
17%
H.264
720
606
-16%
527
-27%
864 ?(319 - 1481, n=49, last 2 years)
20%
WiFi v1.3
578
510
-12%
476
-18%
453
-22%
614
6%
580
0%
651 ?(262 - 1204, n=79, last 2 years)
13%
Reader / Idle
1011
1292
1240 ?(612 - 2760, n=12, last 2 years)
Load
122
135
124
97.1 ?(39 - 209, n=54, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 高级全金属结构
+ 500 万像素网络摄像头，带红外功能
+ 鲜艳的 2.8K OLED 面板
+ 负载情况下发热量低、噪音小
+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- PWM 频率低
- CPU 和 iGPU 性能无法与搭载 Ryzen 7 的 SKU 相媲美
- 无法长时间维持 41 W PL2
- 扬声器音量低于 Ryzen 7 版本
- 电源效率低于 Ryzen 7 SKU

评语：与 AMD Zen 4 相比，升级难度很大

HPPavilion Plus 14 Core i7。评测机由惠普印度公司提供。
HPPavilion Plus 14 Core i7。评测机由惠普印度公司提供。

惠普Pavilion Plus 14 是一款不错的多媒体笔记本电脑，可以很好地兼顾办公用途。它做工精良，外观优雅，并提供包括 Thunderbolt 4 在内的良好连接性。带有红外功能的 500 万像素网络摄像头和鲜艳的 2.8K IMAX 增强型 OLED 显示屏等功能是英特尔和 AMD 两款顶级产品的共同特点。

Pavilion Plus 14 英特尔酷睿 i7-1355U版本为日常使用提供了足够的性能，但它明显落后于 Pavilion Plus 14的 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U.AMD Zen 4 版本提供了更好的 CPU 和 iGPU 性能，这也使其适合轻度游戏。

惠普Pavilion Plus 14 酷睿 i7 很难推荐，尤其是在同一款笔记本电脑配备性能更强、更省电、更便宜的 Ryzen 7 时。

Ryzen 7 也更省电，电池续航时间几乎相同。除非你真的需要 Thunderbolt 4 端口，否则Pavilion Plus 14 配备 AMD Ryzen 几乎在所有方面都是更好的选择。

Ryzen 7 变体的售价甚至比其英特尔酷睿 i7 处理器低 100 美元，与之相比更有价值。

从本质上讲，它是整个 联想 ThinkPad T14s的整个故事--这次是惠普品牌。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

测试配置的惠普Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU可在惠普印度在线商店购买，售价为99999英镑。Pavilion Plus 14英特尔酷睿i7版本在惠普美国商店的售价为1020美元，而AMD Ryzen 7版本的售价为920美元。更便宜的选择可以直接在惠普网站上配置。

美国亚马逊提供的Pavilion Plus 14 SKU 采用酷睿 i7-1355U 和专用的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 2050，售价为 1000 美元。

HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU - 12/10/2023 v7 (old)
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam

Chassis
88 / 98 → 89%
Keyboard
87%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
64 / 80 → 80%
Weight
70 / 20-72 → 96%
Battery
88 / 95 → 93%
Display
89%
Games Performance
66 / 90 → 73%
Application Performance
94 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
92%
Noise
97 / 95 → 100%
Audio
77%
Camera
42 / 85 → 50%
Average
80%
88%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普Pavilion Plus 14 Core i7 评测：英特尔 Raptor Lake 还是 AMD Zen 4？选择一目了然
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam, 2023-12-11 (Update: 2023-12-11)