惠普Pavilion Plus 14 Core i7 评测:英特尔 Raptor Lake 还是 AMD Zen 4?选择一目了然
惠普新推出的Pavilion Plus 系列似乎击中了正确的音符。我们之前评测过 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U-动力 Pavilion Plus 14现在我们将目光转向其基于英特尔的同胞兄弟。
目前惠普Pavilion Plus 14 的配置基于 英特尔酷睿 i7-1355U并配备 16 GB LPDDR5x 内存和 1 TB PCIe NVMe 存储。
这两款Pavilion Plus 14 具有众多共同属性,包括 "IMAX 增强型 "2.8K 120 Hz HDR OLED 显示屏。因此,在本次评测中,我们将主要关注两个版本之间的性能差异。
我们的配置在印度的官方售价为 99,999 ₹,但通过各种银行和银行卡优惠,售价约为 90,000 ₹。在美国,这款产品目前在惠普官方商店的折扣价为 1019.99 美元。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.5 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 17.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
87.8 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18.8 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.9 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
85.6 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
91.5 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1 kg | 17.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.6 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.20" | 3120x2080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
底盘、维护和输入设备
这款笔记本电脑的全金属机身、维护和输入设备等方面都与之前评测过的 AMD 型号一致。有关这些方面的更多详情,请查看我们之前的报道。
连接性雷电 4 和稳定的 Wi-Fi 6E 速度
Pavilion Plus 14 的端口选择还算不错。英特尔机型比 AMD 机型多了一个 Thunderbolt 4 端口,而 AMD 机型只有一个 USB 3.2 Type-C 端口。
由于没有专用的直流输入端口,因此插入电源适配器时,其中一个 Type-C 端口将被占用。
作为一款采用英特尔 Evo 设计的产品,Pavilion Plus 14 自然配备了英特尔 Wi-Fi 6E AX211 无线局域网卡。与 AMD SKU 所使用的联发科 Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 相比,该卡在性能上具有明显优势,特别是在与我们的参考机型华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器配对进行的 iPerf3 接收测试中。
6 GHz 频段只能提供微弱的吞吐量提升,但我们注意到这里的传输速度更稳定,不会出现 5 GHz 频段的性能下降。
Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average of class Multimedia (358 - 1921, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (64 - 1921, n=242) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 |
Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Average of class Multimedia (709 - 1789, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=242) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X |
Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average of class Multimedia (705 - 1816, n=36, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (385 - 1851, n=214) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (700 - 1857, n=213) | |
Average of class Multimedia (700 - 1807, n=36, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
网络摄像头
与 AMD 版本不同的是,我们使用默认的 Windows 摄像头应用程序以 500 万像素拍摄照片时没有任何问题。与大多数配备 720p 或 1080p 网络摄像头的笔记本电脑相比,图像质量有了很大提高。
我们的测试图显示了丰富的细节和足够的清晰度,但色彩准确度还有待提高。手动物理网络摄像头快门可增加私密性。捆绑的 HP Enhanced Camera 和 HP Enhanced Lighting 应用程序为视频会议提供了更多生活质量功能。
安全
Pavilion Plus 14 配备了 TPM 2.0 模块,符合 Windows 11 的安全要求。红外摄像头可进行基于 Windows Hello 的面部识别。遗憾的是,这款笔记本电脑没有配备肯辛顿锁插槽。
配件和保修
标准包装内有一个 65 瓦的电源适配器和常见的文件,没有任何附件。
惠普为Pavilion Plus 14 在印度提供标准的一年保修服务。购买者还可以选择符合条件的惠普保修后护理包和意外损坏保护,保修期从一年(10,763 ₹)到三年(下一工作日现场保修最高可达 14,459 ₹)不等。
显示屏:2.8K "IMAX 增强 "OLED,带 HDR 和 120 Hz PWM
搭载酷睿 i7 处理器的Pavilion Plus 14 采用 2880 x 1800 14 英寸 OLED 面板,刷新率为 120 Hz,峰值 HDR 亮度为 500 尼特。这为用户带来了主观上身临其境的观看体验,而较高的纵横比则旨在体现笔记本电脑的 "IMAX Enhanced "品牌形象。
选择酷睿 i5 机型的用户可以选择 FHD+ 或 QHD+ 分辨率。
惠普宣称 SDR 的峰值亮度为 400 尼特,我们的测试验证了这一数字,最大亮度为 392 尼特。HDR 的表现更好,峰值亮度超过了 606 尼特。
面板显示出 97% 的出色亮度均匀性和近乎无限的对比度。由于这是一款 OLED 面板,因此不会出现背光渗漏。
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 386 cd/m²
Contrast: 38700:1 (Black: 0.01 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.6
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 Samsung ATNA40YK11-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X ATNA40YK07-1 SDC4171, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U B140UAK01.2, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 TMX1422, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | 2% | 1% | -51% | -6% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.9 | 99.8 2% | 99.9 2% | 99.9 2% | 39.9 -59% | 89.8 -8% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.6 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 59.7 -40% | 99.4 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 92.1 | 95.8 4% | 95.4 4% | 93.6 2% | 41.2 -55% | 84.2 -9% |
Response Times | 168% | 120% | 120% | -114% | 43280% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 10.8 ? | 0.82 ? 92% | 1.85 ? 83% | 2 ? 81% | 27.7 ? -156% | 20 ? -85% |
Response Time Black / White * | 9.29 ? | 0.95 ? 90% | 2 ? 78% | 2 ? 78% | 15.9 ? -71% | 7 ? 25% |
PWM Frequency | 120 ? | 504.7 ? 321% | 357 ? 198% | 360 ? 200% | 156000 ? 129900% | |
Screen | -8% | -78% | -60% | -545% | -276% | |
Brightness middle | 387 | 384 -1% | 278 -28% | 389.9 1% | 322.5 -17% | 595 54% |
Brightness | 387 | 386 0% | 279 -28% | 390 1% | 296 -24% | 550 42% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 98 1% | 96 -1% | 99 2% | 85 -12% | 85 -12% |
Black Level * | 0.01 | 0.04 -300% | 0.0497 -397% | 0.44 -4300% | 0.25 -2400% | |
Contrast | 38700 | 6950 -82% | 7845 -80% | 733 -98% | 2380 -94% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.03 | 4.06 -100% | 3.01 -48% | 2.22 -9% | 3.72 -83% | 2.01 1% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.86 | 6.73 -74% | 4.43 -15% | 3.75 3% | 14.68 -280% | 6.9 -79% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.6 | 0.49 69% | 4.14 -159% | 1.9 -19% | 1.22 24% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 1.1 52% | 3.2 -39% | 2.4 -4% | 4 -74% | 2.74 -19% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.26 97% | 2.194 100% | 2.187 101% | 2.29 96% | 2.4 92% |
CCT | 6523 100% | 6331 103% | 6126 106% | 6426 101% | 6064 107% | 6319 103% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 54% /
35% | 15% /
-22% | 20% /
-9% | -237% /
-378% | 14333% /
8489% |
* ... smaller is better
该显示器覆盖了近 100% 的 sRGB 和 Display P3 色彩空间,以及 92.1% 的 Adobe RGB 色彩空间。这使它非常适合媒体编辑和消费。
开箱即用的色彩再现效果不错,灰度和 ColorChecker Delta E 2000 的平均值分别约为 2.3 和 2.03。
我们使用肖像显示器公司提供的 X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3 分光光度计和 Calman Ultimate 软件进行校准,进一步将相应值提高到 0.8 和 1.6。
我们的校准 ICC 文件可从上面的链接下载。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
9.29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.79 ms rise | |
↘ 0.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.4 ms rise | |
↘ 1.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
响应时间尚可,但可以做得更好。我们不得不手动估算 50% 灰色到 80% 灰色的响应时间,因为该模式显示出异常陡峭的下降。
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在刷新率为 120 Hz 时,PWM 可在 120 Hz 或其倍数之间振荡,最高可达 480 Hz。在相应的刷新率下,PWM 下降到 60 赫兹。
无论如何,PWM 频率都偏低,可能会给对其敏感的用户带来困扰。
查看我们的入门指南为什么 PWM 如此令人头疼"了解更多信息。在我们的 PWM 排名表.
光亮的显示屏在阳光直射下会让人感到不适。可视角度相当稳定,在极端情况下不会出现明显的亮度或色彩损失。
性能不敌基于 Ryzen 7 7840U 的Pavilion Plus 14
惠普提供两种型号的Pavilion Plus 14 酷睿 i5-1335U和酷睿 i7-1355U 两种选择。myHP 应用程序只提供平衡电源配置文件,因此我们使用 Windows 电源管理设置为最佳性能来进行所有基准测试。
酷睿 i7-1355U 是一款 10 核(2P+8E)12 线程部件,在本设备中的 PL1 工作功耗为 25 W,PL2 为 41 W。
处理器
Pavilion Plus 14 Core i7 在整体 CPU 基准测试中大大落后于搭载 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U 的同类产品。这在意料之中,因为酷睿 i7-1355U 只提供了两个带超线程的 P 核心,其余都是 E 核心。
尽管 Core i7-1355U 的单核成绩通常与 8C/16T Ryzen 7 7840U 相当或略微领先,但这取决于基准测试。
与 Core i7-1355U 的平均成绩相比,我们的评测样本累计落后 8%。较低的 PL2 也使Pavilion Plus 14 略微处于劣势,尤其是在多核方面,与华硕 ExpertBook B9 相比,后者使用相同的芯片,但功耗限制更高。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (6936 - 10252, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1687 - 1889, n=18) | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (2849 - 3907, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (654 - 725, n=18) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1206 - 1735, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (237 - 267, n=18) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (328 - 503, n=18) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (30255 - 42092, n=18) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (5301 - 5911, n=18) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (7507 - 9328, n=18) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1678 - 1872, n=18) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (7.83 - 11.4, n=18) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (41.1 - 108.6, n=18) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (0.4481 - 0.832, n=18) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U |
* ... smaller is better
在运行 Cinebench R15 多核循环时,CPU 的各种参数显示,酷睿 i7-1355U 的峰值主频为 3.83 GHz,功耗为 42.2 W。
Pavilion Plus 14 插电时默认为最佳性能,电池供电时默认为平衡配置文件。出于某种原因,酷睿 i7-1355U 在电池供电时的 Cinebench 显示结果很奇怪,与最佳性能模式相比,它似乎更倾向于平衡模式。
因此,虽然 Cinebench R20 的单核性能下降了约 24%,但有趣的是,多核性能却在电池供电时提高了 3%。我们在多次运行 Cinebench R23 后也观察到了同样的异常结果。
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (5673 - 8424, n=18) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (29580 - 42706, n=18) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1529 - 2200, n=18) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (21547 - 66907, n=18) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (4045 - 5426, n=18) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (14596 - 21627, n=18) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (31432 - 75408, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (454 - 684, n=18) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (2991 - 4453, n=18) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (21800 - 46154, n=18) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
查看我们的专用 英特尔酷睿 i7-1355U页面,了解更多信息和性能比较。
系统性能
基于 AMD 的Pavilion Plus 14 在 PCMark 10 总分上领先酷睿 i7 版本 19%。不过,在 CrossMark 的累积测试中,两款设备几乎打成平手。总体而言,Pavilion Plus 14 在满足日常计算和网页浏览需求方面没有任何问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5455 - 5933, n=15) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10203 - 11822, n=15) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6763 - 7536, n=15) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5723 - 6712, n=15) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1478 - 1643, n=15) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1444 - 1665, n=15) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1563 - 1732, n=15) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1217 - 1681, n=15) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (35017 - 71600, n=15) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (38551 - 58600, n=15) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (35910 - 93342, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (80.3 - 346, n=15) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (149.2 - 295, n=15) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (94.2 - 256, n=13) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (507 - 1449, n=15) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5169 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3115 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5455 points | |
Help |
DPC 延迟
DPC 延迟时间优于Pavilion Plus 14 的一些竞争对手,包括 AMD 变体、联想 ThinkPad T14s 联想 ThinkPad T14s和 华为 MateBook X Pro但仍然偏高。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
* ... smaller is better
我们的 DPC 延迟排名页面提供了经审核设备的 LatencyMon 测量读数概览。
存储设备
Pavilion Plus 14 配备了 SK Hynix PC801 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD。累计性能比该硬盘记录的平均成绩慢了约 26%,但与 AMD 版笔记本电脑使用的 WDC PC SN810 不相上下。
硬盘性能相对稳定,但我们在队列深度为 8 的 DiskSpd 读取循环测试中观察到,运行 20 次后速度明显下降。
内部存储空间无法进一步扩展。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
更多存储基准可在我们的 固态硬盘比较页面.
图形处理器性能
Pavilion Plus 14 依靠集成的 Iris Xe Graphics 96 EUs 来驱动视觉效果。累积 3DMark 性能与其他采用该 iGPU 的笔记本电脑类似。
不过,英特尔版本的性能要比搭载 AMD 处理器的Pavilion Plus 14 差远了,因为后者配备了更出色的 Radeon 780MiGPU 性能高出 33%。在 3DMark 11 Performance GPU 等测试中,Radeon 780M 的性能提升高达 86%。
3DMark 11 Performance | 6907 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 128665 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21922 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4926 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2398 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1753 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
Pavilion Plus 14 并不是一款游戏笔记本。Iris Xe 图形处理器只能运行昔日的游戏,而且最多只能在中低设置下运行。
尽管设置很低,但 iGPU 仍能在 1080p 超高速运行TheWitcher 3 时保持相对稳定的帧率。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=81, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 |
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 88.5 | 74.3 | 22 | 9.38 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 73.5 | 50.8 | 28 | 13.2 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 97.7 | 71.7 | 55.2 | 47.1 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 40.6 | 23.7 | 16.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 37.1 | 25.6 | 23 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 40 | 24 | 23 | 21 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 88.3 | 38.1 | 30.6 | 23.4 |
F1 22 (2022) | 37.6 | 33.5 | 25.4 | 19.1 |
查看我们的 Intel Iris Xe 图形 96 EUs页面了解更多信息。
排放:表面温度低,负载情况下风扇噪音小
系统噪音
基于英特尔技术的Pavilion Plus 14 的风扇在日常使用中几乎听不到噪音。即使在负载情况下,风扇噪音也仅在 32 分贝(A)左右。在使用过程中,我们没有注意到任何线圈啸叫或来自机箱的杂音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 20.57 / 20.57 / 20.57 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32.18 / 32.26 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 19.35 dB(A) |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014 | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -20% | -10% | -25% | -22% | -30% | |
off / environment * | 19.35 | 23.4 -21% | 23.2 -20% | 24.9 -29% | 24.9 -29% | 25.4 -31% |
Idle Minimum * | 20.57 | 24.1 -17% | 23.2 -13% | 24.9 -21% | 24.9 -21% | 25.4 -23% |
Idle Average * | 20.57 | 24.1 -17% | 23.2 -13% | 24.9 -21% | 24.9 -21% | 25.4 -23% |
Idle Maximum * | 20.57 | 25.3 -23% | 23.6 -15% | 24.9 -21% | 24.9 -21% | 29.6 -44% |
Load Average * | 32.18 | 33.4 -4% | 24.3 24% | 31.9 1% | 33 -3% | 42 -31% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 29.44 | 39.4 -34% | 35.7 -21% | 43.2 -47% | ||
Load Maximum * | 32.26 | 39.4 -22% | 35.7 -11% | 43.2 -34% | 45 -39% | 40.9 -27% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
单风扇单热管组合似乎足以维持可控的表面温度。我们记录到的最大热点温度为 39 °C,位于底部机箱最左侧,当时正在使用 1080p 超高清 Witcher 3 。
无论负载如何,触摸板和掌托区域都保持凉爽。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.4 °C / -4.4 F).
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 8% | 9% | -5% | -27% | -17% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 36.6 | 39 -7% | 39.8 -9% | 44.8 -22% | 48.8 -33% | 46.5 -27% |
Maximum Bottom * | 37.2 | 35.8 4% | 35.2 5% | 34.8 6% | 56.5 -52% | 44.7 -20% |
Idle Upper Side * | 31.6 | 25.2 20% | 25.6 19% | 30.7 3% | 33.3 -5% | 34.9 -10% |
Idle Bottom * | 30 | 25.6 15% | 24.4 19% | 32.5 -8% | 35 -17% | 32.9 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
使用 Prime95 就地大型 FFT 对Pavilion Plus 14 进行的压力测试表明,酷睿 i7-1355U 的峰值封装功耗为 42 W,频率提升高达 2.85 GHz。不过,在测试过程中,这些值分别稳定在 18.5 W 和 1.74 GHz 的平均值。
在加入 FurMark 后,集成的 Iris Xe Graphics 可以瞬间使用 20.3 W 的功率并将频率提升到 1,300 MHz,但总体功率不能超过 4 W。不过,在 1080p 超高速运行 Witcher 3 时,iGPU 的 功耗为 9.23 W,平均频率可提升至 1,177 MHz。
压力测试 | CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度(°C) |
系统空闲 | 1.16 | 300 | 43 | 46 |
Prime95 | 1.55 | 300 | 73 | 62 |
Prime95 + FurMark | 1.07 | 450 | 63 | 64 |
Witcher 3 1080p Ultra | 3.53 | 1,300 | 58 | 66 |
发言人
Pavilion Plus 14 的 B&O 调谐立体声扬声器能为一个普通大小的房间提供足够的响度,但低于其搭载 AMD 处理器的同类产品。低音输出不足,但中高音再现良好。
如果希望获得更好的音效,可以使用 3.5 毫米音频接口或蓝牙 5.3。
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理:节约用电,电池寿命长
耗电量
英特尔和 AMDPavilion Plus 14s 的功耗总体上差不多。不过,由于 Radeon 780M的性能更强,AMD 版在 1080p Ultra 下的 Witcher 3 功耗要高出 18%。
Pavilion Plus 14 酷睿 i7 在空闲状态下的耗电量极低,这使它与华硕 ExpertBook B9 相比具有明显优势。随附的 65 W 电源适配器足以在压力下为笔记本供电。
Off / Standby | 0.26 / 2.13 Watt |
Idle | 6.7 / 7.16 / 11.17 Watt |
Load |
46.5 / 64.36 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2" | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 1% | 14% | -3% | -18% | -8% | 0% | -41% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.7 | 6 10% | 3.1 54% | 6.79 -1% | 4.9 27% | 4.1 39% | 5.34 ? 20% | 6.54 ? 2% |
Idle Average * | 7.16 | 6.5 9% | 6.5 9% | 6.83 5% | 12.5 -75% | 6.6 8% | 8.55 ? -19% | 11.3 ? -58% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.17 | 13.9 -24% | 7.9 29% | 10.5 6% | 16.8 -50% | 8 28% | 10.8 ? 3% | 13.3 ? -19% |
Load Average * | 46.5 | 41.9 10% | 40 14% | 45.9 1% | 43.8 6% | 61 -31% | 45.3 ? 3% | 70.7 ? -52% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.2 | 43.9 -18% | 43.2 -16% | 45.6 -23% | 41.2 -11% | 56 -51% | ||
Load Maximum * | 64.36 | 50.8 21% | 69 -7% | 69.8 -8% | 68.1 -6% | 90 -40% | 67.5 ? -5% | 116.1 ? -80% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power Consumption: External monitor
电池寿命
68 瓦时的电池提供了良好的运行时间,可以轻松支撑一个典型的工作日。在 150 尼特的条件下,我们的标准网页浏览脚本可实现近 9 小时 40 分钟的运行时间,H.264 1080p 播放可实现 12 小时的运行时间。
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 68 Wh | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 54.6 Wh | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 63 Wh | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -12% | -18% | -22% | -5% | -14% | 15% | |
H.264 | 720 | 606 -16% | 527 -27% | 847 ? 18% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 578 | 510 -12% | 476 -18% | 453 -22% | 614 6% | 580 0% | 640 ? 11% |
Reader / Idle | 1011 | 1292 | 1168 ? | ||||
Load | 122 | 135 | 124 | 97.1 ? |
Pros
Cons
评语:与 AMD Zen 4 相比,升级难度很大
惠普Pavilion Plus 14 是一款不错的多媒体笔记本电脑,可以很好地兼顾办公用途。它做工精良,外观优雅,并提供包括 Thunderbolt 4 在内的良好连接性。带有红外功能的 500 万像素网络摄像头和鲜艳的 2.8K IMAX 增强型 OLED 显示屏等功能是英特尔和 AMD 两款顶级产品的共同特点。
Pavilion Plus 14 英特尔酷睿 i7-1355U版本为日常使用提供了足够的性能,但它明显落后于 Pavilion Plus 14的 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U.AMD Zen 4 版本提供了更好的 CPU 和 iGPU 性能,这也使其适合轻度游戏。
惠普Pavilion Plus 14 酷睿 i7 很难推荐,尤其是在同一款笔记本电脑配备性能更强、更省电、更便宜的 Ryzen 7 时。
Ryzen 7 也更省电,电池续航时间几乎相同。除非你真的需要 Thunderbolt 4 端口,否则Pavilion Plus 14 配备 AMD Ryzen 几乎在所有方面都是更好的选择。
Ryzen 7 变体的售价甚至比其英特尔酷睿 i7 处理器低 100 美元,与之相比更有价值。
从本质上讲,它是整个 联想 ThinkPad T14s的整个故事--这次是惠普品牌。
价格和供应情况
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
- 12/10/2023 v7 (old)
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.