Alienware x16 R2 笔记本电脑评测:比 x16 R1 更进一步
![Alienware x16 R2 P120F Alienware x16 R2 P120F](fileadmin/_processed_/4/c/csm_PXL_20240528_2047501152_cc76bfc286.jpg)
随着 Alienware x16 R1 的亮相,超薄型 Alienware x16 系列于去年年底推出。2024 年,该系列又更新了 x16 R2。新款机型将老款的 Raptor Lake-H 处理器换成了支持 AI 的 Meteor Lake-H 处理器,而其他方面则与最初的 x16 R1 设计基本保持一致。因此,我们建议您查看我们的 x16 R1 的评论因为我们现有的大部分评论仍适用于外观相同的 x16 R2。任何明显的不同之处都将在本评测中注明。
我们这次评测的是高端配置,配备酷睿至尊 9 185H CPU、175 WGeForce RTX 4080 GPU、1600p 240 Hz 显示屏和超扁平 CherryMX 机械按键,售价约为 3200 美元。其他 SKU 包括普通薄膜式按键和配备GeForce RTX 4060、4070 或 4090 图形处理器和 1200p 480 Hz IPS 显示屏的 Core Ultra 7 155H。
Alienware x16 R2 的替代产品包括其他高端 16 英寸游戏笔记本电脑,如 Razer Blade 16,华硕 ROG Strix Scar 16,联想Legion Pro 7 16或 微星 Vector 16 HX.
更多戴尔评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.4 % | 05/2024 | Alienware x16 R2 P120F Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 18.57 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.4 % | 06/2023 | Alienware x16 R1 i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 18.57 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
90.2 % | 03/2024 | Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.6 % | 04/2024 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 30.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.5 % | 03/2024 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 21.95 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88 % | 02/2024 | MSI Vector 16 HX A14V i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 28.55 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 无外部变化
连接性
SD 读卡器
有趣的是,我们 x16 R2 上的 MicroSD 阅读器没有出现去年 x16 R1 上的传输速率问题。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Alienware m16 R2 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Alienware x16 R1 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Alienware x16 R1 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Alienware m16 R2 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
交流
戴尔为今年的更新升级了 WLAN 模块,以支持 Wi-Fi 7。
网络摄像头
![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/f/1/csm_WIN_20240529_12_15_23_Pro_d255b9afde.jpg)
显示屏 - 不再有 165 赫兹选项
戴尔将去年 x16 R1 上的京东方 NE16NZ4 面板换成了今年 x16 R2 上的京东方 B160QAN。不过,这两款面板在色彩还原、响应时间、亮度水平和对比度方面几乎完全相同,可提供基本相同的观看体验。
原生刷新率可设置为 240 Hz 或 60 Hz,没有可变选项。只有设置为 dGPU 模式而非 Optimus 模式时,才支持 G-Sync。
用户可以在两个显示器之间进行配置,如下图所示,而 x16 R1 有三个显示器:
- 2560 x 1600、240 Hz、100% DCI-P3、G-Sync、高级 Optimus
- 1920 x 1200、480 Hz、100% DCI-P3、G-Sync、高级 Optimus
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 348.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 1056:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.98, calibrated: 0.42
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
88.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Alienware x16 R2 P120F BOE B160QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Alienware x16 R1 BOE NE16NZ4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Alienware m16 R2 BOE NE16NYH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR BOE NE160QDM-NM7, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H BOE CQ NE16QDM-NZB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Chi Mei N160GME-GTB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -16% | 1% | -1% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 98.3 | 99.2 1% | 71 -28% | 99.8 2% | 98.5 0% | 95.4 -3% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.7 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 88.8 | 88.6 0% | 71.4 -20% | 90.8 2% | 86.7 -2% | 85.4 -4% |
Response Times | -32% | -29% | -31% | -99% | -46% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 3.9 ? | 5.1 ? -31% | 5.7 ? -46% | 5 ? -28% | 12.6 ? -223% | 5.7 ? -46% |
Response Time Black / White * | 7.8 ? | 10.3 ? -32% | 8.7 ? -12% | 10.4 ? -33% | 5.8 ? 26% | 11.4 ? -46% |
PWM Frequency | 2040 ? | |||||
Screen | -13% | 5% | 16% | 21% | -27% | |
Brightness middle | 348.4 | 302.2 -13% | 345.8 -1% | 490 41% | 487 40% | 557.2 60% |
Brightness | 340 | 285 -16% | 337 -1% | 487 43% | 460 35% | 506 49% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 89 -1% | 87 -3% | 94 4% | 88 -2% | 83 -8% |
Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.26 21% | 0.3 9% | 0.4 -21% | 0.42 -27% | 0.41 -24% |
Contrast | 1056 | 1162 10% | 1153 9% | 1225 16% | 1160 10% | 1359 29% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.68 | 1.63 39% | 1.99 26% | 1.08 60% | 1.12 58% | 2.91 -9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.14 | 4.13 -0% | 3.52 15% | 2.38 43% | 2.26 45% | 5.94 -43% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.42 | 1.17 -179% | 0.62 -48% | 0.9 -114% | 0.54 -29% | 1.63 -288% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 2.5 26% | 2.1 38% | 1.1 68% | 1.4 59% | 3.8 -12% |
Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.23 99% | 2.32 95% | 2.13 103% | 2.242 98% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 6083 107% | 6590 99% | 6369 102% | 6724 97% | 6809 95% | 6408 101% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -15% /
-13% | -13% /
-4% | -5% /
6% | -26% /
-1% | -25% /
-25% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
7.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.9 ms rise | |
↘ 3.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
3.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.7 ms rise | |
↘ 2.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.5 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17629 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能 - Core Ultra 9 185H 与 Core i9-13900HK 的对比
测试条件
处理器
核心 Core Ultra 9 185H分别比 Core i9-13900HK 和 Core Ultra 9 185H 慢约 5%至 10%和 15%至 20%。 酷睿 i9-13900HK在多线程和单线程应用方面,分别比去年 x16 R1 中的酷睿 i9-13900HK 慢约 5% 至 10% 和 15% 至 20%。有趣的是,降级到 酷睿至尊 7 155H配置预计不会对性能造成明显影响。 Alienware m16 R2如下图所示。
Raptor Lake-HX 选项,如 酷睿 i9-14900HX等 Raptor Lake-HX 选件无法在 Alienware x16 系列上使用,可能是由于散热限制,因为这些处理器比 Meteor Lake-H 系列需要更多电能。这些选件的性能将明显快于酷睿 i9-13900HK 或酷睿 Ultra 9 185H。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9220 - 18676, n=8) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (48865 - 96463, n=8) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (2394 - 4534, n=8) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (66785 - 95241, n=8) | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (7255 - 11392, n=8) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (24004 - 48020, n=8) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (53116 - 154066, n=8) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R1 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (678 - 1341, n=8) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4428 - 10078, n=8) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (45560 - 53918, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
压力测试
CPU 和 GPU 的核心温度与我们在 x16 R1 上记录的温度一样高。特别是在运行 Prime95 时,CPU 的温度仍然稳定在近 100 摄氏度(!),而 GPU 在运行 Prime95 时的温度则稳定在 80 摄氏度左右。 Witcher 3.有趣的是,与 x16 R1 相比,GPU 时钟率全面下降。与原始 x16 R1 的 2460 MHz 相比,GPU 的频率范围在 2100 至 2325 MHz 之间,具体取决于电源配置文件。较新的 x16 R2 型号的电路板功耗也较低(150 瓦比 165 瓦)。这些发现与下文 GPU 性能部分中普遍较慢的图形性能相关。
平均 CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | 平均 GPU 温度(°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 38 | 31 |
Prime95 压力 | 3.2 | -- | 101 | 50 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.2 | 2175 | 99 | 82 |
Witcher 3 压力(平衡模式) | 0.7 | 2100 | 99 | 86 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能模式) | 0.7 | 2250 | 87 | 86 |
Witcher 3 压力(超速模式) | 0.8 | 2325 | 97 | 86 |
系统性能
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7251 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (71990 - 95718, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (75449 - 87768, n=8) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (70596 - 93871, n=8) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (129.6 - 146.1, n=8) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备配备了 WDC PC SN810取代了去年型号上的 SK Hynix PC801。从下面的 DiskSpd 循环图中可以看出,西部数据硬盘比 SK Hynix 硬盘能维持更长时间的最大传输速率,但写入速度普遍较慢。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
175 W 移动GeForce RTX 4080 GPU 保持不变,尽管 3DMark 分数比我们在 x16 R1 上记录的分数慢了约 5%。升级到 RTX 4090配置有望将性能提高 5% 至 15%,而降级到 RTX 4070或 4060性能将分别降低 30% 和 45%。
电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
超速模式 | 42558 | 29029 | 11691 |
性能模式 | 40773 (-4%) | 26070 (-10%) | 12450 (-7%) |
平衡模式 | 40593 (-5%) | 26746 (-8%) | 12237 (-5%) |
电池供电 | 21754 (-49%) | 25880 (-11%) | 9863 (-16%) |
如Fire Strike 上表所示,在 "性能 "模式而非 "超频 "模式下运行系统会略微影响整体性能。有趣的是,性能模式和平衡模式之间的差异相对要小得多。
3DMark 11 Performance | 40504 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 31904 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 17164 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
令人失望的是,游戏性能始终比我们在 x16 R1 上记录的性能低 5% 到 15%。在较低分辨率下,差距会更大,而在较高分辨率下,差距会更小,这与上文提到的酷睿 i9-14900HK 原始 CPU 性能较慢的结果是一致的。
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (124.8 - 181.2, n=4) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (88.7 - 129.3, n=4) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
3840x2160 Ultra Preset | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (48.8 - 68.4, n=4) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
3840x2160 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (90.9 - 104.4, n=2) |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (83.9 - 127.1, n=10) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (56.2 - 86.3, n=10) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
3840x2160 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (25.8 - 39.8, n=5) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (43.8 - 65.4, n=10) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
3840x2160 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (16 - 19.3, n=2) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 364.4 | 340.7 | 292.1 | 166.3 | 118.5 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 155.7 | 142 | 139.2 | 133 | 127.9 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 188 | 169.3 | 139.8 | 120.8 | 70.2 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 134 | 117.4 | 89.3 | 78 | |||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 137 | 127 | 122 | 114 | 114 | 91 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 427 | 336 | 317 | 293 | 226 | 112.9 | |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 220.8 | 199.6 | 166.7 | 144.5 | 99 | 50.1 | |
F1 22 (2022) | 219 | 211 | 185.7 | 108.5 | 65.6 | 36.6 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 186.8 | 172.9 | 161.2 | 159.4 | 124.3 | 104.4 | 65 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 121.5 | 118.7 | 109 | 99.7 | 75.4 | 32.5 |
排放量
系统噪音
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.8 / 28.5 / 28.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 28.8 / 54.2 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Alienware x16 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HK, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | -3% | -20% | -22% | -28% | |
off / environment * | 23.4 | 22.7 3% | 24.7 -6% | 21.07 10% | 24 -3% | 23.2 1% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.8 | 23.1 3% | 25.3 -6% | 29.75 -25% | 25 -5% | 33.5 -41% |
Idle Average * | 28.5 | 25.8 9% | 25.3 11% | 29.75 -4% | 30 -5% | 33.5 -18% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.5 | 25.8 9% | 25.3 11% | 29.75 -4% | 45 -58% | 33.5 -18% |
Load Average * | 28.8 | 39.3 -36% | 31.7 -10% | 54.85 -90% | 50 -74% | 52.1 -81% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.5 | 49.9 -1% | 53.8 -9% | 57.8 -17% | 54 -9% | 62 -25% |
Load Maximum * | 54.2 | 54.8 -1% | 62 -14% | 58 -7% | 56 -3% | 62 -14% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.2 °C / 91.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.3 °C / -7.8 F).
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Alienware x16 R1 Intel Core i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 3% | -1% | 5% | 1% | 27% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 51 | 47.2 7% | 44.8 12% | 47.8 6% | 46 10% | 36.4 29% |
Maximum Bottom * | 50.8 | 47.8 6% | 48 6% | 52.2 -3% | 49 4% | 35.6 30% |
Idle Upper Side * | 36.6 | 36.8 -1% | 37.2 -2% | 32.4 11% | 38 -4% | 26.6 27% |
Idle Bottom * | 35.2 | 35.8 -2% | 42 -19% | 33 6% | 37 -5% | 27 23% |
* ... smaller is better
Alienware x16 R2 P120F audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
在运行游戏或 Prime95 压力测试等高负载时,总体消耗量比我们在 x16 R1 上记录的消耗量低约 10%至 15%。然而,这一不足伴随着上述 CPU 和 GPU 性能的降低。因此,尽管 CPU 发生了变化,但每瓦性能与去年相比基本持平。
我们在待机模式下遇到了一个错误。如果设置为 Optimus 模式,待机模式将正常运行,耗电量小于 1 瓦。但如果设置为 dGPU 模式和 Overdrive 模式,待机模式的耗电量将高达 39 瓦,导致笔记本电脑温度过高,电池电量消耗过大。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Alienware x16 R1 i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | MSI Vector 16 HX A14V i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -55% | 11% | -10% | -30% | -27% | |
Idle Minimum * | 9.9 | 25.2 -155% | 8.1 18% | 10.71 -8% | 16 -62% | 15.8 -60% |
Idle Average * | 14.5 | 29.9 -106% | 13 10% | 14.75 -2% | 21 -45% | 23.3 -61% |
Idle Maximum * | 33.5 | 49.8 -49% | 40.3 -20% | 30 10% | 36 -7% | 30 10% |
Load Average * | 97.5 | 105.4 -8% | 79 19% | 135 -38% | 132 -35% | 123.9 -27% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 230 | 263 -14% | 188.1 18% | 286 -24% | 267 -16% | 285 -24% |
Load Maximum * | 315.2 | 313.8 -0% | 254.9 19% | 307 3% | 360 -14% | 306 3% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
这次的运行时间稍长,可能是由于上文提到的整体功耗较低。与 x16 R1 相比,我们的 WLAN 运行时间延长了 40 多分钟,但大多数其他游戏笔记本电脑的运行时间仍然要长得多,包括戴尔自己的 Alienware m16 R2.
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Alienware x16 R1 i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | MSI Vector 16 HX A14V i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -23% | 150% | 125% | 93% | 72% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 193 | 149 -23% | 483 150% | 434 125% | 373 93% | 332 72% |
Reader / Idle | 436 | 758 | 641 | |||
Load | 44 | 60 | 51 | 84 | ||
H.264 | 451 | |||||
Witcher 3 ultra | 57 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - Alienware x16 R1 对于纯游戏而言速度更快
与 x16 R1 相比,Alienware x16 R2 的最大优势在于它集成了 NPU,可用于加速 Windows AI 任务。预计在未来一年左右,通过 Microsoft Co-Pilot 和其他即将推出的人工智能驱动应用,此类功能将变得非常普遍。不过,就游戏而言,到 2024 年,NPU 对游戏体验的改善还微乎其微。可以说,与去年 x16 R1 的酷睿 i9-13900HK 相比,CPU 的原始性能有所下降,因为宝贵的芯片空间被留给了新的神经处理器。
Alienware x16 R2 引入了集成 NPU 的全新 Meteor Lake-H CPU,以兼容未来的 Windows AI 功能。遗憾的是,原始游戏性能因此受到了影响。
普遍较慢的性能也使得功耗更低,运行时间比最初推出的机型更长。不过,喜欢购买 Alienware 的目标游戏发烧友可能不会对以性能换电池续航时间感到非常兴奋。这种做法在低端的 戴尔 G 系列相反。
我们建议考虑最初的 x16 R1因为 x16 R2 没有提供任何新的 GPU 选项、显示屏选项,甚至连机箱颜色或外部变化都没有。只有那些希望通过集成 NPU 来 "面向未来 "工作空间的用户,才会对 CPU 进行更新。
价格和供应情况
戴尔现在出货的Alienware x16 R2配置为Core Ultra 7、GeForce RTX 4060、标准键盘和1600p240 IPS,起价2100美元;如果配置为Core Ultra 9、RTX 4090和机械键盘,则高达3500美元。
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
-
05/29/2024 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.