Alienware x16 R2 笔记本电脑评测:比 x16 R1 更进一步
随着 Alienware x16 R1 的亮相,超薄型 Alienware x16 系列于去年年底推出。2024 年,该系列又更新了 x16 R2。新款机型将老款的 Raptor Lake-H 处理器换成了支持 AI 的 Meteor Lake-H 处理器,而其他方面则与最初的 x16 R1 设计基本保持一致。因此,我们建议您查看我们的 x16 R1 的评论因为我们现有的大部分评论仍适用于外观相同的 x16 R2。任何明显的不同之处都将在本评测中注明。
我们这次评测的是高端配置,配备酷睿至尊 9 185H CPU、175 WGeForce RTX 4080 GPU、1600p 240 Hz 显示屏和超扁平 CherryMX 机械按键,售价约为 3200 美元。其他 SKU 包括普通薄膜式按键和配备GeForce RTX 4060、4070 或 4090 图形处理器和 1200p 480 Hz IPS 显示屏的 Core Ultra 7 155H。
Alienware x16 R2 的替代产品包括其他高端 16 英寸游戏笔记本电脑,如 Razer Blade 16,华硕 ROG Strix Scar 16,联想Legion Pro 7 16或 微星 Vector 16 HX.
更多戴尔评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Alienware x16 R2 P120F Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 18.57 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Alienware x16 R1 i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 18.57 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
90.2 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.6 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 30.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.5 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 21.95 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | MSI Vector 16 HX A14V i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 28.55 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 无外部变化
连接性
SD 读卡器
有趣的是,我们 x16 R2 上的 MicroSD 阅读器没有出现去年 x16 R1 上的传输速率问题。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Alienware m16 R2 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Alienware x16 R1 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Alienware x16 R1 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Alienware m16 R2 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
交流
戴尔为今年的更新升级了 WLAN 模块,以支持 Wi-Fi 7。
网络摄像头
维护
显示屏 - 不再有 165 赫兹选项
戴尔将去年 x16 R1 上的京东方 NE16NZ4 面板换成了今年 x16 R2 上的京东方 B160QAN。不过,这两款面板在色彩还原、响应时间、亮度水平和对比度方面几乎完全相同,可提供基本相同的观看体验。
原生刷新率可设置为 240 Hz 或 60 Hz,没有可变选项。只有设置为 dGPU 模式而非 Optimus 模式时,才支持 G-Sync。
用户可以在两个显示器之间进行配置,如下图所示,而 x16 R1 有三个显示器:
- 2560 x 1600、240 Hz、100% DCI-P3、G-Sync、高级 Optimus
- 1920 x 1200、480 Hz、100% DCI-P3、G-Sync、高级 Optimus
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 348.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 1056:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.42
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Alienware x16 R2 P120F BOE B160QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Alienware x16 R1 BOE NE16NZ4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Alienware m16 R2 BOE NE16NYH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR BOE NE160QDM-NM7, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H BOE CQ NE16QDM-NZB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Chi Mei N160GME-GTB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -16% | 1% | -1% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 98.3 | 99.2 1% | 71 -28% | 99.8 2% | 98.5 0% | 95.4 -3% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.7 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 88.8 | 88.6 0% | 71.4 -20% | 90.8 2% | 86.7 -2% | 85.4 -4% |
Response Times | -32% | -29% | -31% | -99% | -46% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 3.9 ? | 5.1 ? -31% | 5.7 ? -46% | 5 ? -28% | 12.6 ? -223% | 5.7 ? -46% |
Response Time Black / White * | 7.8 ? | 10.3 ? -32% | 8.7 ? -12% | 10.4 ? -33% | 5.8 ? 26% | 11.4 ? -46% |
PWM Frequency | 2040 ? | |||||
Screen | -13% | 5% | 16% | 21% | -27% | |
Brightness middle | 348.4 | 302.2 -13% | 345.8 -1% | 490 41% | 487 40% | 557.2 60% |
Brightness | 340 | 285 -16% | 337 -1% | 487 43% | 460 35% | 506 49% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 89 -1% | 87 -3% | 94 4% | 88 -2% | 83 -8% |
Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.26 21% | 0.3 9% | 0.4 -21% | 0.42 -27% | 0.41 -24% |
Contrast | 1056 | 1162 10% | 1153 9% | 1225 16% | 1160 10% | 1359 29% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.68 | 1.63 39% | 1.99 26% | 1.08 60% | 1.12 58% | 2.91 -9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.14 | 4.13 -0% | 3.52 15% | 2.38 43% | 2.26 45% | 5.94 -43% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.42 | 1.17 -179% | 0.62 -48% | 0.9 -114% | 0.54 -29% | 1.63 -288% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 2.5 26% | 2.1 38% | 1.1 68% | 1.4 59% | 3.8 -12% |
Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.23 99% | 2.32 95% | 2.13 103% | 2.242 98% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 6083 107% | 6590 99% | 6369 102% | 6724 97% | 6809 95% | 6408 101% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -15% /
-13% | -13% /
-4% | -5% /
6% | -26% /
-1% | -25% /
-25% |
* ... smaller is better
显示屏默认设置为 sRGB,尽管它支持完整的 P3 色彩。尽管色温略微偏暖,但校准效果还算不错。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
7.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.9 ms rise | |
↘ 3.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
3.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.7 ms rise | |
↘ 2.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - Core Ultra 9 185H 与 Core i9-13900HK 的对比
测试条件
我们将 Alienware Command Center 设置为 Overdrive 模式,并将显卡设置为 dGPU 模式,以获得最佳基准测试结果。我们建议用户熟悉指挥中心,因为它是调整 RGB 灯光效果和性能配置文件的中心。
如上截图所示,Nvidia 控制面板不提供 "仅 iGPU "模式。
处理器
核心 Core Ultra 9 185H分别比 Core i9-13900HK 和 Core Ultra 9 185H 慢约 5%至 10%和 15%至 20%。 酷睿 i9-13900HK在多线程和单线程应用方面,分别比去年 x16 R1 中的酷睿 i9-13900HK 慢约 5% 至 10% 和 15% 至 20%。有趣的是,降级到 酷睿至尊 7 155H配置预计不会对性能造成明显影响。 Alienware m16 R2如下图所示。
Raptor Lake-HX 选项,如 酷睿 i9-14900HX等 Raptor Lake-HX 选件无法在 Alienware x16 系列上使用,可能是由于散热限制,因为这些处理器比 Meteor Lake-H 系列需要更多电能。这些选件的性能将明显快于酷睿 i9-13900HK 或酷睿 Ultra 9 185H。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9220 - 18676, n=17) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (48865 - 96463, n=17) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (2394 - 4534, n=17) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (66785 - 95241, n=17) | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (7255 - 11392, n=17) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (24004 - 48020, n=17) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (53116 - 154066, n=17) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R1 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (678 - 1341, n=17) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4428 - 10078, n=17) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (44809 - 53918, n=17) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
压力测试
CPU 和 GPU 的核心温度与我们在 x16 R1 上记录的温度一样高。特别是在运行 Prime95 时,CPU 的温度仍然稳定在近 100 摄氏度(!),而 GPU 在运行 Prime95 时的温度则稳定在 80 摄氏度左右。 Witcher 3.有趣的是,与 x16 R1 相比,GPU 时钟率全面下降。与原始 x16 R1 的 2460 MHz 相比,GPU 的频率范围在 2100 至 2325 MHz 之间,具体取决于电源配置文件。较新的 x16 R2 型号的电路板功耗也较低(150 瓦比 165 瓦)。这些发现与下文 GPU 性能部分中普遍较慢的图形性能相关。
平均 CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | 平均 GPU 温度(°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 38 | 31 |
Prime95 压力 | 3.2 | -- | 101 | 50 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.2 | 2175 | 99 | 82 |
Witcher 3 压力(平衡模式) | 0.7 | 2100 | 99 | 86 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能模式) | 0.7 | 2250 | 87 | 86 |
Witcher 3 压力(超速模式) | 0.8 | 2325 | 97 | 86 |
系统性能
PCMark 的结果与之前差不多,甚至更低。同时,今年的内存速度稍快(7467 MT/s 对 6000 MT/s),AIDA64 复制/读取结果稍高,但写入和延迟结果较慢。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7251 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (69929 - 95718, n=17) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (64619 - 87768, n=17) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (51114 - 93871, n=17) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (121.4 - 259, n=17) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
即使在 Optimus 模式下重试多次,当打开主页的多个浏览器标签页时,LatencyMon 仍会显示明显的 DPC 问题。我们在原始 x16 R1 上没有遇到此类问题。60 FPS 的 4K 视频回放也非常完美,没有掉帧记录。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备配备了 WDC PC SN810取代了去年型号上的 SK Hynix PC801。从下面的 DiskSpd 循环图中可以看出,西部数据硬盘比 SK Hynix 硬盘能维持更长时间的最大传输速率,但写入速度普遍较慢。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
175 W 移动GeForce RTX 4080 GPU 保持不变,尽管 3DMark 分数比我们在 x16 R1 上记录的分数慢了约 5%。升级到 RTX 4090配置有望将性能提高 5% 至 15%,而降级到 RTX 4070或 4060性能将分别降低 30% 和 45%。
电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
超速模式 | 42558 | 29029 | 11691 |
性能模式 | 40773 (-4%) | 26070 (-10%) | 12450 (-7%) |
平衡模式 | 40593 (-5%) | 26746 (-8%) | 12237 (-5%) |
电池供电 | 21754 (-49%) | 25880 (-11%) | 9863 (-16%) |
如Fire Strike 上表所示,在 "性能 "模式而非 "超频 "模式下运行系统会略微影响整体性能。有趣的是,性能模式和平衡模式之间的差异相对要小得多。
3DMark 11 Performance | 40504 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 31904 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 17164 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
令人失望的是,游戏性能始终比我们在 x16 R1 上记录的性能低 5% 到 15%。在较低分辨率下,差距会更大,而在较高分辨率下,差距会更小,这与上文提到的酷睿 i9-14900HK 原始 CPU 性能较慢的结果是一致的。
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (111.8 - 181.2, n=5) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (88.3 - 129.3, n=5) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
3840x2160 Ultra Preset | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (48.8 - 68.4, n=4) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
3840x2160 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (90.9 - 104.4, n=2) |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (83.9 - 127.1, n=12) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (56.2 - 86.3, n=15) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
3840x2160 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (25.8 - 39.8, n=6) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (43.8 - 67.2, n=11) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
3840x2160 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (16 - 20, n=3) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 364.4 | 340.7 | 292.1 | 166.3 | 118.5 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 155.7 | 142 | 139.2 | 133 | 127.9 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 188 | 169.3 | 139.8 | 120.8 | 70.2 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 134 | 117.4 | 89.3 | 78 | |||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 137 | 127 | 122 | 114 | 114 | 91 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 427 | 336 | 317 | 293 | 226 | 112.9 | |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 220.8 | 199.6 | 166.7 | 144.5 | 99 | 50.1 | |
F1 22 (2022) | 219 | 211 | 185.7 | 108.5 | 65.6 | 36.6 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 186.8 | 172.9 | 161.2 | 159.4 | 124.3 | 104.4 | 65 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 121.5 | 118.7 | 109 | 99.7 | 75.4 | 32.5 |
排放量
系统噪音
x16 R2 的风扇在需要提高转速和噪音之前,能保持更长时间的安静。此外,在性能模式和超频模式下,噪音上限与我们在 x16 R1 上记录的噪音上限相似,分别约为 50 dB(A) 和 54 dB(A)。请注意,在平衡模式下游戏时的风扇噪音与性能模式完全相同,这与我们上面的 3DMark 结果一致。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.8 / 28.5 / 28.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 28.8 / 54.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.4 dB(A) |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Alienware x16 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HK, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | -3% | -20% | -22% | -28% | |
off / environment * | 23.4 | 22.7 3% | 24.7 -6% | 21.07 10% | 24 -3% | 23.2 1% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.8 | 23.1 3% | 25.3 -6% | 29.75 -25% | 25 -5% | 33.5 -41% |
Idle Average * | 28.5 | 25.8 9% | 25.3 11% | 29.75 -4% | 30 -5% | 33.5 -18% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.5 | 25.8 9% | 25.3 11% | 29.75 -4% | 45 -58% | 33.5 -18% |
Load Average * | 28.8 | 39.3 -36% | 31.7 -10% | 54.85 -90% | 50 -74% | 52.1 -81% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.5 | 49.9 -1% | 53.8 -9% | 57.8 -17% | 54 -9% | 62 -25% |
Load Maximum * | 54.2 | 54.8 -1% | 62 -14% | 58 -7% | 56 -3% | 62 -14% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
机箱后半部分的表面温度很高,而前半部分的手掌和手指温度则明显较低。与 m16 系列相比,Alienware x16 系列使用了更多的通风栅格,这也是出于必要,因为 x16 设计的特点就是薄。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.2 °C / 91.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.3 °C / -7.8 F).
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Alienware x16 R1 Intel Core i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 3% | -1% | 5% | 1% | 27% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 51 | 47.2 7% | 44.8 12% | 47.8 6% | 46 10% | 36.4 29% |
Maximum Bottom * | 50.8 | 47.8 6% | 48 6% | 52.2 -3% | 49 4% | 35.6 30% |
Idle Upper Side * | 36.6 | 36.8 -1% | 37.2 -2% | 32.4 11% | 38 -4% | 26.6 27% |
Idle Bottom * | 35.2 | 35.8 -2% | 42 -19% | 33 6% | 37 -5% | 27 23% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Alienware x16 R2 P120F audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
在运行游戏或 Prime95 压力测试等高负载时,总体消耗量比我们在 x16 R1 上记录的消耗量低约 10%至 15%。然而,这一不足伴随着上述 CPU 和 GPU 性能的降低。因此,尽管 CPU 发生了变化,但每瓦性能与去年相比基本持平。
我们在待机模式下遇到了一个错误。如果设置为 Optimus 模式,待机模式将正常运行,耗电量小于 1 瓦。但如果设置为 dGPU 模式和 Overdrive 模式,待机模式的耗电量将高达 39 瓦,导致笔记本电脑温度过高,电池电量消耗过大。
Off / Standby | 0.06 / 0.1 Watt |
Idle | 9.9 / 14.5 / 33.5 Watt |
Load |
97.5 / 315.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Alienware x16 R1 i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | MSI Vector 16 HX A14V i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -55% | 11% | -10% | -30% | -27% | |
Idle Minimum * | 9.9 | 25.2 -155% | 8.1 18% | 10.71 -8% | 16 -62% | 15.8 -60% |
Idle Average * | 14.5 | 29.9 -106% | 13 10% | 14.75 -2% | 21 -45% | 23.3 -61% |
Idle Maximum * | 33.5 | 49.8 -49% | 40.3 -20% | 30 10% | 36 -7% | 30 10% |
Load Average * | 97.5 | 105.4 -8% | 79 19% | 135 -38% | 132 -35% | 123.9 -27% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 230 | 263 -14% | 188.1 18% | 286 -24% | 267 -16% | 285 -24% |
Load Maximum * | 315.2 | 313.8 -0% | 254.9 19% | 307 3% | 360 -14% | 306 3% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
这次的运行时间稍长,可能是由于上文提到的整体功耗较低。与 x16 R1 相比,我们的 WLAN 运行时间延长了 40 多分钟,但大多数其他游戏笔记本电脑的运行时间仍然要长得多,包括戴尔自己的 Alienware m16 R2.
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Alienware x16 R1 i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | MSI Vector 16 HX A14V i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -23% | 150% | 125% | 93% | 72% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 193 | 149 -23% | 483 150% | 434 125% | 373 93% | 332 72% |
Reader / Idle | 436 | 758 | 641 | |||
Load | 44 | 60 | 51 | 84 | ||
H.264 | 451 | |||||
Witcher 3 ultra | 57 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - Alienware x16 R1 对于纯游戏而言速度更快
与 x16 R1 相比,Alienware x16 R2 的最大优势在于它集成了 NPU,可用于加速 Windows AI 任务。预计在未来一年左右,通过 Microsoft Co-Pilot 和其他即将推出的人工智能驱动应用,此类功能将变得非常普遍。不过,就游戏而言,到 2024 年,NPU 对游戏体验的改善还微乎其微。可以说,与去年 x16 R1 的酷睿 i9-13900HK 相比,CPU 的原始性能有所下降,因为宝贵的芯片空间被留给了新的神经处理器。
Alienware x16 R2 引入了集成 NPU 的全新 Meteor Lake-H CPU,以兼容未来的 Windows AI 功能。遗憾的是,原始游戏性能因此受到了影响。
普遍较慢的性能也使得功耗更低,运行时间比最初推出的机型更长。不过,喜欢购买 Alienware 的目标游戏发烧友可能不会对以性能换电池续航时间感到非常兴奋。这种做法在低端的 戴尔 G 系列相反。
我们建议考虑最初的 x16 R1因为 x16 R2 没有提供任何新的 GPU 选项、显示屏选项,甚至连机箱颜色或外部变化都没有。只有那些希望通过集成 NPU 来 "面向未来 "工作空间的用户,才会对 CPU 进行更新。
价格和供应情况
戴尔现在出货的Alienware x16 R2配置为Core Ultra 7、GeForce RTX 4060、标准键盘和1600p240 IPS,起价2100美元;如果配置为Core Ultra 9、RTX 4090和机械键盘,则高达3500美元。
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
- 05/29/2024 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.