E "并不代表 "Entry-level(入门级)",而是代表 "Edge(边缘)",这正是对最新版 ThinkPad E16 设计的最好诠释。然而,它不起眼的外壳(和规格)却蕴藏着强大的处理器,搭配 AMD Radeon 660M,它甚至可以完成一些图形要求较高的任务。
我们的评测机型是该款笔记本电脑最基本的配置之一,我们推荐它既可用于专业用途,也可用于私人用途。生产力比视觉设计更重要,但归根结底,它是一台 ThinkPad。
这同样适用于典型的竞争对手,它们大多由联想自己生产。例如,性能稍好的 ThinkPad L16 或造型另类的 ThinkBook 16 G6.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83.8 % | v8 | 10 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE R5 7535HS, Radeon 660M | 1.9 kg | 21.3 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
84.8 % | v8 | 10 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE R7 PRO 7735U, Radeon 680M | 1.9 kg | 25.2 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
86.6 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | 1.3 kg | 19.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
87.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM R7 7735U, Radeon 680M | 1.2 kg | 13.95 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
85.9 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Acer TravelMate P4 TMP414-53-58XQ i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.5 kg | 22 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
85.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP R5 7530U, Vega 7 | 1.8 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
85.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.8 kg | 19.85 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.
机箱 - 铝质部件使 ThinkPad 更加坚固耐用
ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 的塑料和铝合金混合材质给人坚固而优雅的印象。这款笔记本电脑看起来比实际的 21 毫米还要纤薄。此外,它几乎不可能扭曲或弯曲,这一点在显示屏上尤为明显,特别是如果你有一台塑料边框的机型作为对比的话。唯一令人讨厌的是,该设备非常容易留下指纹,而这些指纹也很难从其粗糙的表面去除。
尽管采用了 16 英寸显示屏,但这款笔记本电脑却相对小巧,84% 的屏占比就很好地体现了这一点。这还没有考虑到显示屏顶部边缘用于放置网络摄像头和双阵列麦克风的额外空间。
紧绷的显示屏铰链使单手打开设备成为一项挑战,但另一方面,在最大打开角度为 180 度时,铰链能非常稳固地固定显示屏。无论从哪个角度打开,都不会出现严重的晃动。
在重量方面,E16 无法与注重移动性的机型相提并论。尽管功能较少,但这款笔记本电脑的重量却达到了 1.9 千克,对于一款 16 英寸的设备来说,这还是可以接受的。与更昂贵的机器相比,该机型缺少碳纤维和镁等轻质材料。
功能 - E16 要求妥协
端口速度不是特别快。一个 USB-A 端口和一个 USB-C 端口都只能达到旧的 USB 3.0 最高标准 5 Gbit/s。另外两个端口至少能提供两倍的传输速度,对于外置固态硬盘来说已经足够。LAN 端口提供预期的 1 Gbit/s 带宽。目前,你只能在游戏笔记本电脑中找到 2.5 Gbit/s。
端口位置考虑周全。后部的 USB-C 端口(您将自动使用它来供电)是速度较慢的版本。左侧和右侧各有一个 USB-A 端口。相比之下,没有卡槽、智能卡槽或 SIM 卡槽。
交流
通过 Wi-Fi 模块,我们测得了稳定、典型的办公级传输速度,有时甚至略高。至少在距离路由器较近的地方,这意味着可以轻松超越 1 Gbit/s 的网线。
有了 WiFi 6E,无线速度达到了相当高的水平。此外,将频率提高到 6 千兆赫后,在有许多不同网络的地区也能实现更稳定的连接。
E16 Gen 2 的所有型号都没有移动通信选项。
网络摄像头
全高清摄像头完全符合其设计要求:即使在光线不足的情况下,它也能再现足够明亮和细腻的图像。在走廊上行走或关闭室内灯光时,系统也能应对光线的突然变化,只需不到一秒钟的时间就能轻松辨认人脸。同时,这种行为也解释了我们测试捕捉到的令人震惊的色彩偏差。即使是简单的网络摄像头在这方面也往往做得更好。但是,由于这里的一切都以视频通话的良好照明为目标,因此总体图像质量受到了影响。
在这种情况下,麦克风就不那么令人信服了:声音听起来很自然,从不同方向传来的音量也相当一致。但是,在距离稍远的地方,录音质量下降得太快,我们不喜欢。这正是双阵列麦克风所擅长的。
安全
ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 拥有两项基本安全功能。除了设备侧面内置的 Kensington 锁外,电源按钮上还有一个指纹传感器。作为额外的可选项,你还可以选择一个红外摄像头,用于人脸识别。
维护
幸运的是,所有重要部件都可以更换或升级。卸下七颗十字螺丝后,就可以轻松拆卸内存、固态硬盘和 Wi-Fi 模块以及电池(再次拧紧)。不过,你也不必担心会弄坏固定底板的一个或多个塑料夹子。
此外,还有一个空闲的插槽,可以安装额外的固态硬盘。与已安装的(仅)42 毫米长的固态硬盘不同,它可以容纳更常见的 80 毫米长的固态硬盘。因此,扩展存储空间是一项简单易行的任务。
可持续性
联想正在通过使其笔记本电脑更具可持续性来显示其雄心壮志。包装不使用任何塑料,完全由再生纸组成。电源主要由回收塑料制成。ThinkPad 本身还包含由回收塑料制成的其他小部件。
据说,生产过程中产生的二氧化碳排放量相当于 146 千克二氧化碳。这比前一代产品 ThinkPad E16 Gen 1 减少了近 20%。
保修
联想一般为 ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 提供 1 年保修。如需额外收费,保修期可延长至包括现场服务。也可以延长至 5 年。
输入设备 - 与 ThinkPad 不相称
键盘、TrackPoint 和触摸板都是小弱点,但这只是在以其他同类 ThinkPad 为基准时才会出现的问题。一般来说,打字是一种快速而愉悦的体验,但与更高级的 ThinkPad 系列中的可更换键盘相比,你应该期望打字速度更快一些。在直接比较中,按键压力似乎稍硬,产生的噪音也稍大。
TrackPoint 按钮似乎有点容易移动,而且缺乏一个明显、实在的压力点。相比之下,触摸板则可以精确使用。隐藏式按键可以快速、干净利落地按下。不过,触摸板表面对灰尘很敏感,因此比玻璃表面更难清洁。
显示屏 - 办公任务简单高效
ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 的屏幕旨在用作工作专用面板。因此,16:10 的格式比例不仅能显示更大的图像区域,还能更好地显示办公程序或浏览器,非常适合。分辨率略高于全高清,这意味着文字显示清晰,不会出现细节过小的情况。此外,对比度更高,亮度略高于平均水平,黑阶也不错。因此,在亮度较高的环境中也能清晰显示内容,文字和细节几乎总是非常清晰。
相比之下,该显示器并不适合图形要求较高的任务。即使经过校准,也会出现明显的色彩偏差,图像总是显得有些灰暗和苍白。对于私人照片收藏以及电影和游戏来说,这可能已经足够了。但是,如果你想编辑和优化图形和图像,那么这款显示器就完全不行了。
此外,背光还会出现明显的出血现象。在右边的照片中,不需要增强任何功能就能看到边缘不规则的亮区,而在显示暗色电影场景或黑色图像边框时,这些亮区仍然部分可见。边缘的轻微压力表明面板没有得到最佳使用。因此,在我们评测设备以外的其他设备上,背光出血现象可能会有所不同,希望不会那么明显。
总的来说,在显示文字、图像和图形方面,这款产品所采用的基本技术是没有问题的。对于大多数任务来说,它根本不需要做得更多。不过,如果需要更多的功能,还可以选择 WQXGA 分辨率(2,560 x 1,600 像素)的 IPS 面板,具有完整的 sRGB 色彩空间,亮度为每平方米 400 烛光。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 364 cd/m²
Contrast: 1456:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 5.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
40.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE MNG007QS1-3, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE MNG007QS1-3, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE MNE007JA1-2, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U R160NW41 R2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM Samsung SDC4168, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 71% | 7% | 3% | 121% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.4 | 39.5 0% | 67.8 72% | 42 7% | 40.4 3% | 99.7 153% |
sRGB Coverage | 58.2 | 58.7 1% | 99.2 70% | 62.6 8% | 59.8 3% | 100 72% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.7 | 40.8 0% | 70 72% | 43.3 6% | 42 3% | 97.2 139% |
Response Times | 3% | -57% | -81% | -41% | 87% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 23.7 ? | 24.6 ? -4% | 35.3 ? -49% | 46.4 ? -96% | 32.8 ? -38% | 2 ? 92% |
Response Time Black / White * | 16.6 ? | 15 ? 10% | 27.4 ? -65% | 27.6 ? -66% | 23.9 ? -44% | 3 ? 82% |
PWM Frequency | 239 ? | |||||
Screen | 4% | 40% | 11% | -1% | 39% | |
Brightness middle | 364 | 334 -8% | 406 12% | 318.6 -12% | 310 -15% | 369 1% |
Brightness | 344 | 322 -6% | 402 17% | 302 -12% | 290 -16% | 371 8% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 89 -2% | 93 2% | 91 0% | 86 -5% | 97 7% |
Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.3 -20% | 0.22 12% | 0.29 -16% | 0.22 12% | |
Contrast | 1456 | 1113 -24% | 1845 27% | 1099 -25% | 1409 -3% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.7 | 5.4 19% | 2 70% | 3.73 44% | 6.2 7% | 2.3 66% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.4 | 19.6 8% | 5.1 76% | 16.51 23% | 24.7 -15% | 4.37 80% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5.3 | 4.9 8% | 0.6 89% | 2.03 62% | 5.3 -0% | 2.87 46% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 2 59% | 2.4 51% | 3.2 35% | 3.8 22% | 1.83 63% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.15 102% | 2.12 104% | 2.28 96% | 2.22 99% | 2.39 92% |
CCT | 6010 108% | 6283 103% | 6244 104% | 6780 96% | 6011 108% | 6392 102% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
3% | 18% /
33% | -21% /
-3% | -13% /
-6% | 82% /
67% |
* ... smaller is better
对于办公笔记本电脑来说,能覆盖近 60% 的 sRGB 色彩空间就差不多可以接受了。在上网、研究或创建简单图形等方面,有限的色彩空间并不是特别重要。
但即使是一张有轻微色彩渐变的照片,如蓝色的天空,也能显示出在更好的显示器上几乎看不到或更不明显的渐变。
色彩准确度测试令人失望。基本上,训练有素的眼睛可以检测到整个色谱的偏差,尤其是蓝色和紫色。校准并没有带来任何改善。这不能仅仅归因于色彩空间的整体有限,因为 ThinkPad E16 1 代的前代产品(同样采用了非常简单的显示屏)产生了可以接受的结果。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
16.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.7 ms rise | |
↘ 7.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
23.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise | |
↘ 12.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在户外,应避免阳光直射。在阴天时,由于对比度良好,文字仍然非常清晰。如果将笔记本电脑朝向阳光,则可以在户外正常工作。
无论视角如何,都没有观察到色彩变化,这也是 IPS 面板的预期效果。不过,当视角大于 30 度时,亮度会降低。
性能 - E16 Gen 2 的高效性令人印象深刻
所提供的七款处理器至少都能提供不错到出色的性能。从性能稍弱的 AMD Ryzen 5 7535U到我们评测的 AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS一直到速度稍快的 英特尔酷睿至尊 5 125U或 英特尔酷睿至尊 5 125H以及性能更高的 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H以及 AMD Ryzen 7 7735U或 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS.
您不能选择专用图形芯片。不过,AMD 和英特尔的大型 CPU 可以通过 iGPU 处理一些图形要求较高的任务。内存可自行升级,有 8、16 或 32 GB DDR5-4800 规格。最大可扩展至 64 GB。
测试条件
与往常一样,ThinkPad 没有任何特殊的性能设置。通过 Windows 性能设置,您可以从 3 种模式中选择一种来调节 CPU 的供电。
- 最佳性能:PL1 30 W| PL2 35 W
- 平衡:PL1 20 W| PL2 25 W
- 最佳节能/电池功率:pl1 10 w| pl2 10 w
我们的测试默认使用 "最佳性能 "设置。
处理器
餈 AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS是一款可靠的中端处理器,负责执行 ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 的计算任务。该处理器的性能与 英特尔酷睿 i5-1335U.它拥有六个相同的 Zen-3+ 内核和十二个线程,最高主频可达 4.55GHz。
CPU 的设计功耗一般为 30 瓦,联想允许它达到 35 瓦的峰值,然后再达到 30 瓦。相比之下,诸如联想 ThinkBook 16 G6或 ThinkPad E16 G1的 CPU 最大功耗分别为 41 瓦和 51 瓦。这也是 Ryzen 5 性能略低于平均水平的主要原因。英特尔 英特尔酷睿至尊 5 125U只能偶尔在单核应用中胜出。
相比之下,我们评测的 E16 在连续测试中提供了迄今为止最稳定的计算性能,因为它的散热量要小得多,这意味着所需的节流更少。更多基准测试和比较可参阅我们的 CPU 基准列表.
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U -2! | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM -2! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE -1! | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (8613 - 10900, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (1445 - 1488, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (3333 - 4224, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (560 - 581, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (1457 - 1757, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (232 - 241, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (286 - 467, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (40996 - 48646, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (5206 - 5670, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Average of class Office (662 - 14767, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (8094 - 8960, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Office (457 - 2769, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (1988 - 2056, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (7189 - 7852, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Average of class Office (510 - 1995, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (1481 - 1502, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (11.3 - 14.2, n=2) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (46.2 - 57, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (0.503 - 0.557, n=2) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (9617 - 12945, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (62262 - 79252, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (2092 - 2679, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (73607 - 82540, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (8888 - 9786, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (34054 - 43495, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (35651 - 105083, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (551 - 665, n=2) | |
Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (5170 - 6899, n=2) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (27096 - 28865, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
系统性能
从 PCMark 10 测试中可以看出,短暂的性能峰值并不一定会提高系统性能。在这方面,ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 稳居中游,比我们最近评测的办公笔记本电脑的平均性能高出 10%。
虽然启动程序或安装进程的速度不如更高端的 CPU(如 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U或 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H等高端 CPU 那样快,但也没有明显的延迟。即使在并行运行多个程序的情况下,也能始终快速流畅地操作设备。
在电池模式下,性能,尤其是 CPU 性能会明显下降。在执行要求较高的任务时,性能下降非常明显。不过,在冲浪或流媒体播放时,差异应该很小。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, AMD Radeon 660M () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, AMD Radeon 660M () | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, AMD Radeon 660M () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, AMD Radeon 660M () | |
Average of class Office (2049 - 9773, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, AMD Radeon 660M () | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, AMD Radeon 660M () |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, AMD Radeon 660M () | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, AMD Radeon 660M () |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, AMD Radeon 660M () |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, AMD Radeon 660M () | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Average of class Office (404 - 1966, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, AMD Radeon 660M () | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6011 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (48529 - 49119, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (40191 - 50259, n=2) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (51316 - 54982, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Average of class Office (6.9 - 185.2, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (87.7 - 103.4, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在 LatencyMon 测试中,出现了许多毫秒级的卡顿,这主要是由网络驱动程序造成的。这在正常运行时几乎看不出来,但在执行实时音频编辑等任务时就不可能没有中断。
在 YouTube 上播放 4K 视频流时,没有出现跳帧现象,这是一个非常好的结果。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
三星的固态硬盘只有 42 毫米长,当然不会打破任何速度记录,但它也成功地避免了任何严重的失误。在连续读取时,它的速度仅为 5,700 MB/s,甚至还能将一些竞争对手甩在身后。
即使在以并行工作步骤读取较小的文件时,也能达到很好的效果,例如在启动设备时就很明显。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
与前一款处理器最大的不同是 AMD Ryzen 5 7530U的最大区别在于集成图形芯片。在 AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS的 Radeon RX Vega 7被一个 Radeon 660M取代。与采用旧版芯片的同类笔记本电脑相比,我们发现其性能通常提高了 40% 至 50%。与英特尔不再更新的 iGPU,即 Iris Xe 80EUs的差距同样很大。
如果对图形要求过高,即使是 Radeon 660M 也会明显吃不消,但进行一些照片和视频编辑以及使用旧版 3D 应用程序还是可以的。
有关各种图形芯片的基准测试、数据和游戏测试,请参阅我们的 GPU 基准列表.
3DMark 11 Performance | 7442 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 23824 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4497 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1782 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 绝对不是为游戏而设计的。只要图形设置过高,帧速率就会迅速降至 20fps 以下。作为工作之余的消遣,iGPU 偶尔还能应付一下游戏,尽管不会对图形处理器提出很高的要求。即使是目前要求并不高的《F1 2024》,在最低设置下也能玩得有模有样。
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average of class Office (3.35 - 47.8, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average of class Office (6.65 - 26.4, n=23, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE |
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Office (16.7 - 60.1, n=8, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average AMD Radeon 660M (19.8 - 25.6, n=2) | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Office (5.6 - 19.1, n=6, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average AMD Radeon 660M () |
在最高图形设置下对《赛博朋克 2077》进行的连续测试中,没有出现任何延迟迹象,这意味着 E16 可以提供持续稳定的性能。显卡 Radeon 680M和 英特尔弧形 4 核心和英特尔 Arc 4 Core,可在基本型 ThinkPad 的其他型号中找到。 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS或 英特尔酷睿 5 125U这两款产品的性能都略胜一筹。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 128.9 | 116.1 | 40.5 | 18.9 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 121.1 | 94.4 | 63.1 | 53.9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 44.9 | 23.7 | 17.2 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 48.2 | 35.6 | 30.8 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 55 | 26 | 23 | 22 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 117.4 | 43.3 | 35 | 29 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 22 | 14 | 13 | 12 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 22.9 | 17.4 | 13.2 | 11.2 |
F1 24 (2024) | 42.2 | 35.5 | 25.6 | 5.6 |
废气排放 - 多为静音商务笔记本电脑
噪音排放
测试过程中的显著特点也反映在我们的标准噪音测量中。ThinkPad E16 G2 非常安静,即使在满载情况下也是如此。你可以很容易地听到风扇的声音,但只是在背景音中,并不十分恼人。如果选择峰值性能略有降低的平衡模式,风扇会变得更加安静。在最弱模式下,笔记本电脑一般会保持完全静音。
作为对比:公认速度更快的 ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 在嘈杂模式下的噪音正好是它的两倍。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.6 / 24.6 / 24.6 dB(A) |
Load |
| 28.2 / 36.3 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.6 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE Radeon 660M, R5 7535HS, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 7735U, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X164N | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014 | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP Vega 7, R5 7530U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N | Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM Radeon 680M, R7 7735U, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -10% | -4% | -4% | -3% | -18% | |
off / environment * | 24.6 | 25.2 -2% | 24.4 1% | 24.6 -0% | 24.3 1% | 25.7 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.6 | 25.2 -2% | 24.4 1% | 24.6 -0% | 24.3 1% | 25.7 -4% |
Idle Average * | 24.6 | 25.2 -2% | 24.4 1% | 24.6 -0% | 24.3 1% | 27 -10% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.6 | 25.2 -2% | 24.4 1% | 24.6 -0% | 24.3 1% | 29.3 -19% |
Load Average * | 28.2 | 38.3 -36% | 32.6 -16% | 32.7 -16% | 29.7 -5% | 42.3 -50% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 36.3 | 41.5 -14% | 39.9 -10% | |||
Load Maximum * | 36.3 | 41.8 -15% | 39.5 -9% | 39.2 -8% | 41.4 -14% | 42.7 -18% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 34.7 | 32.1 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
与产生噪音的情况类似,机箱温度也保持适中,这对于一款体积并不紧凑的商务笔记本电脑来说是意想不到的。即使在最苛刻的条件下,我们在直接位于 CPU 上部的键盘区域测得的最高温度也达到了 43 °C。
相比之下,掌托则保持凉爽。在执行简单任务时,温度仅比室温高几度。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.2 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.2 °C / 75.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+3.4 °C / 6.1 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, AMD Radeon 660M | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U, AMD Radeon 680M | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM AMD Ryzen 7 7735U, AMD Radeon 680M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -5% | 1% | -11% | -19% | -22% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42.6 | 38.6 9% | 40.2 6% | 44 -3% | 40.8 4% | 49.4 -16% |
Maximum Bottom * | 43.3 | 45.7 -6% | 39 10% | 50.4 -16% | 50.5 -17% | 44.7 -3% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.1 | 25.6 -6% | 26 -8% | 27.2 -13% | 29.3 -22% | 34 -41% |
Idle Bottom * | 24.9 | 28.8 -16% | 25.8 -4% | 27.8 -12% | 35.2 -41% | 31.6 -27% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
对 CPU 和 GPU 的持续高负荷运行并没有让 ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 感到无动于衷,但使用 HWiNFO 记录的最高 82 °C 的传感器值要比 100 °C 的临界值低得多。
同时,处理器的供电功率为允许的 30 瓦。我们无法检测到任何节流现象,即使在时钟频率较高的情况下也是如此。
发言人
对于笔记本电脑来说,小型立体声扬声器的表现还是不错的。高音,尤其是声音,听起来不错,甚至很有力量,复杂或混合的声音也能很好地再现。哈曼公司旗下拥有从 JBL 到 Bower & Wilkins 等众多音响品牌,从哈曼公司购买扬声器似乎是个不错的决定。
另一方面,低音特别弱,因此几乎感觉不到。考虑到内置驱动器的尺寸,这当然不足为奇。
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - E16 证明了自己的经济性
耗电量
与英特尔 Raptor Lake 处理器相比,AMD Ryzen CPU 在能效方面更胜一筹,但 Meteor Lake 系列芯片却不再如此。ThinkPad E16 的平均功耗为 7 瓦,在最佳情况下为 4 瓦,这些数据都很强劲,但例如 联想 ThinkPad T14s的 英特尔酷睿 5 125U则要经济得多三分之一。
相比之下,在负载情况下,最大功耗限制就会显现出来。我们甚至没有测出 50 瓦的绝对峰值。总而言之,E16 是一个经济实惠的选择。
Off / Standby | 0.4 / 0.8 Watt |
Idle | 3.6 / 7.1 / 8.4 Watt |
Load |
39 / 47.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE R5 7535HS, Radeon 660M, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE R7 PRO 7735U, Radeon 680M, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X164N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, , IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP R5 7530U, Vega 7, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM R7 7735U, Radeon 680M, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Average AMD Radeon 660M | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -19% | 4% | -21% | -10% | -40% | -15% | -15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.6 | 4.6 -28% | 2.3 36% | 4.9 -36% | 3.7 -3% | 8.6 -139% | 4.41 ? -23% | 4.46 ? -24% |
Idle Average * | 7.1 | 8.2 -15% | 5.1 28% | 8.3 -17% | 7.1 -0% | 7.7 -8% | 6.74 ? 5% | 7.42 ? -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.4 | 8.9 -6% | 6.7 20% | 8.6 -2% | 7.7 8% | 9.3 -11% | 8.29 ? 1% | 8.9 ? -6% |
Load Average * | 39 | 45.8 -17% | 37.5 4% | 42.9 -10% | 43.9 -13% | 47.9 -23% | 46 ? -18% | 42 ? -8% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 35.6 | 41.4 -16% | 41.4 -16% | |||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 36.6 | 42.4 -16% | 37.8 -3% | |||||
Load Maximum * | 47.5 | 65.5 -38% | 68.4 -44% | 67 -41% | 66.6 -40% | 56 -18% | 65.7 ? -38% | 61.6 ? -30% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 44.9 | 40.8 | 46.3 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
ThinkPad 57 瓦时的电池续航时间可圈可点。在中等亮度的上网冲浪测试中,电池的续航时间远远超过了 8 小时。这与基本办公任务所需的时间相差无几。
在飞行模式下播放视频时,该系统的表现更加出色。对于如此大容量的电池来说,12 小时是个不错的数字。在满负荷状态下,我们仍然测得将近 3 个小时,这与任务管理器显示电池模式下处理器利用率限制在 50% 以下有关。
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE R5 7535HS, Radeon 660M, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE R7 PRO 7735U, Radeon 680M, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 58 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 47 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP R5 7530U, Vega 7, 45 Wh | Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM R7 7735U, Radeon 680M, 54 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 9% | 4% | -41% | 5% | -30% | -5% | |
H.264 | 728 | 656 -10% | 696 -4% | 518 -29% | 716 ? -2% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 535 | 674 26% | 712 33% | 314 -41% | 605 13% | 437 -18% | 608 ? 14% |
Load | 159 | 178 12% | 117 -26% | 89 -44% | 117.4 ? -26% | ||
Reader / Idle | 653 | 1239 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 工作主力而非高级笔记本电脑
在 ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 上,联想将其成功的商务笔记本电脑简化到了最基本的要求。计算性能、电池续航时间以及散热系统和电源的平衡性都达到了很好的水平。相比之下,ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 在常规规格上进行了删减,而外壳则给人一种熟悉的高级感。
我们对评测机型的 Ryzen 5 以及系统性能和电池续航时间印象深刻。此外,集成图形芯片至少可以用于执行更复杂的任务,但劣质显示屏在处理数码照片时已显示出其局限性。
这是一款适合安静工作的快速、高效系统,但在显示屏和键盘方面有所妥协。
尺寸也有两面性:显示屏上的图像自然会更大,而设备内部的许多组件也可以很容易地更换和扩展。散热也从所提供的空间中受益匪浅。虽然 16 英寸设备的尺寸并不特别便于移动,也无法快速装入任何包中。
不过,作为商务级的入门机型,一些妥协是可以允许的,而且其强大的性能和电池续航能力可能会特别受到那些同时也在寻找坚固耐用的日常伴侣的学生们的欢迎。如果把工作用电脑的功能缩减到最基本的程度,E16 就是这样一款设备--对于个人和专业用途的混合使用来说,它无疑是非常有趣的。
E16 的其他 CPU 变体尤其具有竞争性。同样昂贵的英特尔酷睿至尊 5 125U 不仅效率更高,而且图形处理能力也更强。而价格高出 100 美元的联想 ThinkPad L16 在键盘和规格方面的妥协要少一些。
价格和供应情况
目前在亚马逊上可以买到配备 Ryzen 5 7535U、32 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘的联想 ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 变体,价格约为 729 美元。
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE
- 10/08/2024 v8
Mario Petzold
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.