联想 ThinkPad E16 G1 英特尔评测:酷睿 i5 与 AMD Ryzen 7 不相上下
ThinkPad E 系列包括面向商务用户的经济型机型,与之形成鲜明对比的是更豪华的 ThinkPad T 系列或更锐利的 ThinkPad X 系列。今年推出的 16 英寸 ThinkPad E16 系列是对现有 14 英寸ThinkPad E14 和 15 英寸ThinkPad E15 选择的补充。ThinkPad E16 有两个版本可供选择,配备英特尔或 AMD 处理器。我们最近评测了 ThinkPad E16 AMD Ryzen 7 版本,现在是时候看看 ThinkPad E16 英特尔酷睿 i5 版本,看看它们之间的差异如何。
我们的英特尔评测机是低端配置,配备酷睿 i5-1335U 和 1200p 触摸屏,零售价约为 800 至 900 美元。其他配置可能高达酷睿 i7-1365U、酷睿 i7-1360P,甚至是酷睿 i7-13700H,配备独立显卡GeForce MX550 和更高分辨率的 1600p 显示屏,价格则要高得多。截至发稿时,此类产品尚未上市。
ThinkPad E16 的替代产品包括其他 16 英寸多媒体或商务笔记本电脑,如Acer TravelMate P4,SamsungGalaxy Book3 Pro 16, 或LG Gram 16 。我们建议您查看我们对ThinkPad E16 G1 AMD 版本的现有评测 ,因为我们的英特尔版本具有相同的机箱设计和物理特性。
更多联想评测:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.5 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.8 kg | 19.85 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.1 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 R7 7730U, Vega 8 | 1.8 kg | 19.85 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
84.6 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 R5 7530U, Vega 7 | 2 kg | 18.99 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
86 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.6 kg | 18.5 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
85.6 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.6 kg | 12.5 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.6 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | LG Gram 16Z90Q i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 16.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
辨别英特尔版本和 AMD 版本的最简单方法是寻找左侧边缘的 Thunderbolt 标志。只有英特尔版本才支持 Thunderbolt,因为目前的 AMD 版本不带 USB4。
交流
网络摄像头
维护
英特尔和 AMD 版本均支持多达两个 M.2 固态硬盘。不过,英特尔版本只支持最长 42 毫米的硬盘,而 AMD 版本则可支持最长 80 毫米的硬盘。这与我们观察到的较小的 14 英寸 ThinkPad E14 G5英特尔和 AMD 版本之间的情况类似。
保修
如果在美国购买,制造商提供一年有限保修。相比之下,T 系列或 X 系列的高端 ThinkPad 机型通常标配三年保修。
显示屏
有以下四种 IPS 雾面材料可供选择:
- 1200p, 60% sRGB, 300 nits, 60 Hz, 非触摸式
- 1200p、60% sRGB、300 nits、60 Hz、触控
- 1200p,100% sRGB,300 尼特,60 赫兹,非触摸式
- 1600p,100% sRGB,400 尼特,60 赫兹,非触摸式
我们的英特尔评测机配备了上述粗体选项,而我们的 AMD 评测机配备了 1600p 选项。英特尔和 AMD 设备的图像质量相差无几,后者看起来更清晰、更鲜艳,响应时间更快,观看体验明显更好。我们建议,除非必须使用触摸屏功能,否则不要选择我们的特定面板选项。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 318.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 1099:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.73 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.03
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
43.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U R160NW41 R2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 MNG007DA1-C, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 Chi Mei 160JCA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN BOE BOE0A32, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Samsung ATNA60CL03-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16" | LG Gram 16Z90Q LG LP160WQ1-SPB2 (LGD06EB), IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 58% | 59% | -7% | 107% | 95% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 42 | 67.6 61% | 67.4 60% | 38.9 -7% | 99.7 137% | 96.8 130% |
sRGB Coverage | 62.6 | 95.3 52% | 98.2 57% | 58.1 -7% | 100 60% | 99.9 60% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.3 | 70 62% | 69.5 61% | 40.2 -7% | 97 124% | 84.6 95% |
Response Times | 30% | 38% | 62% | 95% | 16% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46.4 ? | 32.4 ? 30% | 27.6 ? 41% | 20 ? 57% | 2 ? 96% | 45.7 ? 2% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27.6 ? | 19.6 ? 29% | 18.2 ? 34% | 9 ? 67% | 2 ? 93% | 19.7 ? 29% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | 30% | 12% | -20% | 295% | 13% | |
Brightness middle | 318.6 | 404 27% | 301.3 -5% | 269 -16% | 412 29% | 366 15% |
Brightness | 302 | 389 29% | 269 -11% | 265 -12% | 412 36% | 347 15% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 91 0% | 79 -13% | 94 3% | 98 8% | 89 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.24 17% | 0.28 3% | 0.305 -5% | 0.015 95% | 0.32 -10% |
Contrast | 1099 | 1683 53% | 1076 -2% | 882 -20% | 27467 2399% | 1144 4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.73 | 2.1 44% | 3.1 17% | 4.89 -31% | 2.34 37% | 2.82 24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 16.51 | 4.2 75% | 5.5 67% | 8.81 47% | 3.34 80% | 4.65 72% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.03 | 1.4 31% | 0.49 76% | 5.12 -152% | 2.95 -45% | 2.69 -33% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 3.3 -3% | 3.9 -22% | 2.91 9% | 2.78 13% | 2.3 28% |
Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.24 98% | 2.19 100% | 2.28 96% | 2.5 88% | 1.971 112% |
CCT | 6780 96% | 7038 92% | 6186 105% | 6920 94% | 6879 94% | 6796 96% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 39% /
36% | 36% /
26% | 12% /
-5% | 166% /
226% | 41% /
31% |
* ... smaller is better
使用 X-Rite 色度计校准显示屏后,平均灰度值和色彩 deltaE 值会略有改善,分别从 3.2 和 3.73 降至 2.2 和 2.03。不过,由于上述 sRGB 色彩覆盖范围较窄,无论如何,在饱和度较高的情况下,色彩仍然会变得越来越不准确。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.9 ms rise | |
↘ 14.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
46.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.5 ms rise | |
↘ 26.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。用户应该熟悉内置的 Vantage 软件,因为它是联想特定功能和 BIOS 更新的中心。
处理器
与大多数其他酷睿 i5 和酷睿 i7 CPU 不同的是 酷睿 i5-1335U的性能更接近于价格更高的 酷睿 i7-1355U更接近。基准测试显示,我们的酷睿 i5-1335U 仅比酷睿 i7-1355U 慢 5%到 10%,这意味着如果你不介意 CPU 性能上的微小差距,选择酷睿 i5 配置可以为自己节省几百美元。选择酷睿 i7 的最大原因在于它的集成显卡,这一点在下面的图形处理器性能部分有所体现。
与 Ryzen 7 7730U版本相比,我们的英特尔酷睿 i5 版本在多线程性能方面要慢 10% 到 15%,而在单线程性能方面则恰恰相反。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U (5661 - 7809, n=11) | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U (29483 - 43636, n=11) | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U (1515 - 2278, n=11) | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U (53839 - 60992, n=11) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U (3873 - 5008, n=11) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U (14376 - 20553, n=11) | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U (378 - 676, n=11) | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U (2878 - 4214, n=11) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U (13584 - 41123, n=11) | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 |
系统性能
由于 Ryzen 7 7730U 的多线程性能优于我们的 Core i5-1335U,因此除生产力子测试外,PCMark 结果与 Ryzen 7 AMD 替代机型不相上下。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (5068 - 5600, n=11) | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (9828 - 11912, n=11) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (6196 - 7261, n=11) | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (5361 - 6164, n=11) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1339 - 1599, n=11) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1337 - 1638, n=11) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1315 - 1620, n=11) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1023 - 1868, n=11) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 |
PCMark 10 Score | 5371 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U (22417 - 60884, n=11) | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U (23104 - 61555, n=11) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U (22936 - 72584, n=11) | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Average Intel Core i5-1335U (78.6 - 112.8, n=11) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
LatencyMon 仅在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签时显示出轻微的 DPC 问题。此外,以 60 FPS 播放 4K 视频也非常流畅,没有掉帧记录。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备包括 西部数据 SN740是一款中端 PCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘,实际连续读写速率分别高达 5100 MB/s 和 3900 MB/s。尽管没有任何散热垫或冷却辅助设备,但 2242 硬盘在保持这些最高速率方面没有任何问题。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
我们的集成 Iris Xe 80 EUs 与采用相同 GPU 的其他笔记本电脑相比,我们的集成 Iris Xe 80 EUs 的性能达到了预期水平,甚至略有下降。升级到配备 Iris Xe 96 EUs 的酷睿 i7 配置或 GeForce MX550性能将分别提高 25% 至 30% 或 70% 至 100%。
请务必配置双通道内存,否则 iGPU 性能会大打折扣。
3DMark 11 Performance | 5612 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 19685 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3346 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1310 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
在Witcher 3 上空闲运行时,帧速率会在测试开始时严重下降,这表明有一些背景活动在干扰。幸运的是,在测试的其余时间里,这种情况没有再出现。
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 84.5 | 68.8 | 13.2 | 5.41 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 73.6 | 45.1 | 22.1 | 11.1 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 100.7 | 75.2 | 49.2 | 45 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 31 | 16.9 | 12.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 28.6 | 22.5 | 21 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 40 | 19 | 18 | 17 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 70.3 | 27.3 | 22.4 | 18.3 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 14.1 | |||
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 20.6 | 15.3 | 10.4 | 8.1 |
F1 22 (2022) | 32.8 | 29.1 | 21.3 | 16.5 |
排放量
系统噪音
风扇噪音普遍比 Ryzen 7 版本大,这可能是由于英特尔版本的功耗要求更高。AMD 版在压力较大的情况下能保持较长时间的安静。例如,在运行 3DMark 06 时,风扇噪音会保持在 25 dB(A) 以下,而英特尔版本则接近 33 dB(A)。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.6 / 24.6 / 24.6 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32.7 / 39.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.6 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 Vega 8, R7 7730U, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 Vega 7, R5 7530U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G | Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G | LG Gram 16Z90Q Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 11% | -7% | -10% | -14% | -7% | |
off / environment * | 24.6 | 22.4 9% | 23.6 4% | 25.4 -3% | 25.2 -2% | 25 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.6 | 22.4 9% | 23.6 4% | 25.4 -3% | 25.2 -2% | 26 -6% |
Idle Average * | 24.6 | 22.4 9% | 23.6 4% | 25.4 -3% | 25.2 -2% | 27 -10% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.6 | 23.7 4% | 23.6 4% | 25.4 -3% | 29.3 -19% | 28 -14% |
Load Average * | 32.7 | 24.8 24% | 40.3 -23% | 43.9 -34% | 46.4 -42% | 38 -16% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 34.7 | 29.8 14% | 44.2 -27% | 37 -7% | ||
Load Maximum * | 39.2 | 36.1 8% | 44.2 -13% | 43.7 -11% | 46.4 -18% | 38 3% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
笔记本电脑左半部分的表面温度要高于右半部分,这仅仅是由于处理器和内部冷却解决方案的位置所致。如下图所示,在运行高负载时,上下两侧的热点温度分别高达 38 摄氏度和 45 摄氏度。实际上,与 AMD 配置相比,温度要低几摄氏度,这可能是由于风扇的噪音较大。虽然温度较高和较低的象限之间的温差触感明显,但在使用过程中并不会让人感到不舒服或分心。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.4 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+0.6 °C / 1.1 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 0% | 4% | -1% | -5% | 6% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44 | 46.1 -5% | 41.6 5% | 38.6 12% | 41.6 5% | 45 -2% |
Maximum Bottom * | 50.4 | 52.2 -4% | 39 23% | 44.4 12% | 45 11% | 43 15% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.2 | 25.7 6% | 29.4 -8% | 28.9 -6% | 31 -14% | 26 4% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.8 | 26.7 4% | 28.6 -3% | 34 -22% | 33.6 -21% | 26 6% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在运行 Prime95 时,CPU 会在最初几秒钟内飙升至 4 GHz、50 W 和 94 C,然后稳步下降并稳定在 2.4 GHz、86 C 和 28 W,因为峰值 Turbo Boost 难以为继。对于 16 英寸酷睿 U 系列笔记本电脑来说,80 C 的高温度范围是相当高的。在宏碁 Swift Edge 16上进行同样的测试,CPU 的温度会稳定在 64 摄氏度。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 48 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.4 | -- | 86 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | ~2.2 | 1100 | 86 |
Witcher 3 压力 | ~3.2 | 1250 | 88 |
发言人
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
在运行 CPU 密集型任务时,英特尔系统通常比 AMD 系统要求更高,尽管 AMD 处理器在多线程负载时通常比英特尔更快。例如,在启动 CineBench R15 xT 时,英特尔设备的功耗高达 68 W,而 AMD 设备的功耗仅为 45 W。运行 Prime95 时也能观察到类似的结果。在桌面上空转或运行 GPU 密集型任务(如 Witcher 3等 GPU 密集型任务时,英特尔和 AMD 版本的总功耗大致相同。
Off / Standby | 0.32 / 0.67 Watt |
Idle | 4.9 / 8.3 / 8.6 Watt |
Load |
42.9 / 67 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, , IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 R7 7730U, Vega 8, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 R5 7530U, Vega 7, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16" | LG Gram 16Z90Q i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -3% | 2% | 1% | 9% | -7% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.9 | 4.1 16% | 4.8 2% | 5.2 -6% | 3.9 20% | 5 -2% |
Idle Average * | 8.3 | 9.6 -16% | 7.6 8% | 7.1 14% | 4.8 42% | 8 4% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.6 | 10.2 -19% | 8.7 -1% | 9.6 -12% | 10 -16% | 14 -63% |
Load Average * | 42.9 | 47.3 -10% | 47.1 -10% | 47 -10% | 44 -3% | 47 -10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 44.9 | 46.7 -4% | 46.6 -4% | 43.3 4% | 42.3 6% | 37.8 16% |
Load Maximum * | 67 | 55.7 17% | 56.4 16% | 56 16% | 63 6% | 56 16% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
该机型有两种电池容量可供选择:47 Wh 和 57 Wh。我们的英特尔机型配备的是容量较小的电池,而 AMD 机型配备的是容量较大的电池。在实际浏览 5 小时的情况下,电池续航时间只有 AMD 机型的一半左右。对于一款 16 英寸的笔记本电脑来说,47 Wh 的电池容量比预期的要小得多,这无疑是一种削足适履。
幸运的是,从空电到满电的充电速度非常快,仅需一个多小时。
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 47 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1-21JUS08X00 R7 7730U, Vega 8, 57 Wh | Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 R5 7530U, Vega 7, 64 Wh | Acer TravelMate P4 TMP416-51-55KN i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 56 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 76 Wh | LG Gram 16Z90Q i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 116% | 177% | 79% | 95% | 93% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 314 | 677 116% | 869 177% | 562 79% | 613 95% | 606 93% |
H.264 | 704 | 861 | ||||
Load | 77 | 114 | 119 | 157 | ||
Reader / Idle | 1560 | 1821 | 1085 |
Pros
Cons
结论:AMD 在电池续航能力方面大获全胜
如果您选择英特尔 ThinkPad E16 G1 而不是 AMD,那么将获得 Thunderbolt 支持、更快的单线程性能和更快的集成显卡性能(假设您选择的是酷睿 i7-1355U)。不过,这些优势与 AMD 版本的优势相比,这些优势就显得微不足道了:更长的电池续航时间、更高的每瓦性能、更快的多线程性能以及对 M.2 2280 SSD 的支持。因此,如果你决定跳过 AMD 选项,就必须真正重视英特尔版本的卓越扩展坞功能。
如果你不打算在 ThinkPad E16 G1 上连接 Thunderbolt 显示器或 eGPU,那么 AMD 版本可以提供比英特尔版本更长的电池续航时间和更快的多线程性能,而价格却与英特尔版本差不多。
无论偏好哪种版本,用户在购买前仍需注意显示器和电池的大小。遗憾的是,并非每个零售商都会列出色彩覆盖范围或电池容量,因此很容易不小心购买到配备低端显示屏或较小的 47 Wh 电池组的配置。我们建议尽可能选择全 sRGB 色彩覆盖范围和较大的 57 Wh 电池组,因为它们比基本配置有很大的提升。
价格和供应情况
联想现已开始发售ThinkPad E16 G1,酷睿 i3 配置的起价为 638 美元,酷睿 i5 配置的起价为 724 美元。
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U
- 11/02/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.