联想 ThinkPad T14s 第 5 代笔记本电脑评测:配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra 处理器的高端 T-ThinkPad
ThinkPad X1 Carbon 是 ThinkPad 系列中的佼佼者。然而,联想企业系列中最薄、最轻的 14 英寸笔记本电脑并非人人都买得起,这就是为什么许多客户可能会选择更便宜的 ThinkPad T 系列。买家可以选择:ThinkPad T14,它更便宜一些,模块化程度更高,但也明显更重;或者是 ThinkPad T14s,它在材质感方面更接近 ThinkPad X1。
在这篇评测中,我们将测试 T 系列中最新的薄型高端机型,即联想 ThinkPad T14s 5 代。联想再次完全依赖英特尔 CPU:我们的样品采用的是酷睿 Ultra Series 1 芯片--没有 AMD 可供选择。不过,现在也有配备高通骁龙 X Elite 的 ThinkPad T14s Gen 6,这意味着英特尔在这一细分市场并非完全没有挑战。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.6 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | 1.3 kg | 19.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
89.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
90.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
91.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1 kg | 17.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
90.3 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Dell Latitude 7440 i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.2 kg | 17.95 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
请注意:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 请点击此处.
机箱:T14s 采用 X1 Carbon
碳纤维、镁、铝--这些昂贵的材料构成了联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 的大部分外壳。 ThinkPad T14s 4 代.然而,今年的机型却有很多不同之处;联想对其超薄商务笔记本电脑进行了全新设计。14 英寸的显示屏现在被一个相当纤薄的边框包裹着。因此,所谓的屏占比从 79% 提高到了 83%。不过,制造商随后推出了备受争议的 "通信条",即安装网络摄像头和麦克风的凸起部分。至于这样做是否美观,那就见仁见智了--无论如何,这个凸起都能让屏幕更容易打开。
由于笔记本底座采用了高质量的轻金属部件,因此几乎不会发生扭曲;掌托和键盘也不会发生变形。碳纤维显示屏盖的柔韧性稍好一些,但即便如此,它也能轻松吸收面板背面的压力。这种新设计的部分原因是它重新采用了全黑表面,手感一如既往地天鹅绒般柔软,但不幸的是,它使灰尘和油渍看起来非常明显。铰链和 ThinkPad 徽标传统上一直是银色的,现在也变成了黑色,看起来更加时尚。
说到铰链:联想首次在纤薄的 T 系列产品中安装了超宽的 "条形 "铰链;据推测,Wi-Fi 天线就安装在中间的塑料件中。显示屏的盖子可以打开 180 度,而底座则略微抬起。单手即可打开,盖子几乎不会晃动。
虽然它的重量与上一代机型相比没有变化,但它的占地面积却大大增加了。新款 ThinkPad 明显更加小巧。就尺寸而言,它与戴尔的 戴尔Latitude 7440差不多,而惠普的 EliteBook 845 G10则更重、更大。华硕 华硕 ExpertBook B9是本次对比的所有 14 英寸笔记本电脑中体积最小、重量最轻的一款。
连接性带有 WWAN ex 的 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑可以工作
联想将风扇出风口放在了设备的背面--以前热空气是通过右侧排出的。虽然这样做为端口提供了更多空间,但联想可能会让情况变得更糟:大多数端口(与 ThinkPad T14s G4 相比没有变化)都在左侧,而两个 USB-A 接口现在则紧挨着在右侧。此外,你仍然无法选择从右侧为 ThinkPad 充电。
交流
我们的测试设备使用的是英特尔的 AX211--Wi-Fi 6E 解决方案。它能提供快速的传输速率,在我们的测试中没有表现出任何弱点。在联想ThinkPad T14s Gen 5上可以选择英特尔B200的Wi-Fi 7。
另一个可选功能是 WWAN。我们的样品已经配备了 Quectel EM061K-GL 4G LTE-A 模块。此外,还提供 5G 解决方案。与更便宜的 ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 相比,T14s 自 2019 年以来就没有配备 RJ45 以太网端口,因此有线解决方案的用户将不得不使用 Thunderbolt 适配器。
网络摄像头
网络摄像头在 4:3 模式下分辨率为 500 万像素,在 16:9 模式下为 370 万像素。在光线充足的条件下,图像清晰锐利,但色彩还原明显有待提高。在光线较暗的环境中,图像质量会迅速下降。
安全
由于这是一款面向企业环境的笔记本电脑,因此安全性显得更为重要。例如,智能卡读卡器在消费类笔记本电脑中从未出现过,而作为防盗装置的 Kensington 锁槽在消费类笔记本电脑中也不多见。专用 TPM 芯片也是如此。指纹识别器和用于 Windows Hello 的红外摄像头则更为常见。
配件
联想的 ThinkPad T14s G5 只配备了一个 65 瓦的 USB-C 充电器。有趣的是,这只是一个普通的充电器,而与 联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 4则是一个小巧的 GaN 砖。
维护
在 2024 T 系列产品中,联想将重点放在了具有维护选项的模块化设计上。然而,更薄的联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 却是个例外。要检修内部组件并不难,只需卸下背面的五颗螺丝和几个夹子即可。遗憾的是,由于 RAM 和 Wi-Fi 模块是焊接在一起的,因此在笔记本内部无法进行太多操作。反过来,你可以更换 WWAN 模块和 M.2 2280 SSD。此外,你还可以更换旋入式电池,但与 ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 不同的是,这块电池不是 CRU(客户可更换单元)--这意味着在笔记本保修期内,用户无权自行更换电池。
你也不能更换键盘,因为该机型的键盘是从底部安装的。因此,要更换键盘,必须先拆下包括主板在内的所有部件。
可持续性
在可持续发展方面,联想通过使用完全可回收的包装获得了加分--此外,笔记本电脑的部分外壳也是由可回收材料制成的。作为一款商务笔记本电脑,联想提供的支持也优于一般的消费类笔记本电脑。每台 T14s Gen 5 产生的二氧化碳排放量为 174 千克。
保修
联想ThinkPad T14s Gen 5享有36个月的保修服务。如果出现故障,必须将笔记本送修。或者,技术人员可以上门服务,但您必须预订现场服务套餐,并支付额外费用。保修期还可延长至 60 个月,即五年。由于这是一款商务笔记本电脑,保修期同样适用于国际市场。
输入设备:有若干变化的 ThinkPad 键盘
键盘
在发布 ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 和其他 2024 ThinkPad 时,联想进行了多年来最大规模的键盘布局重新设计。联想有史以来第一次将 FN 键和 Ctrl 键对调,现在 Ctrl 键和大多数笔记本电脑一样位于最左侧--传统上,ThinkPad 上的 FN 键一直是这个位置;从 IBM 时代开始就是这样。对于 ThinkPad 的老用户来说,这可能并不熟悉,但对于来自其他笔记本电脑的用户来说,应该更容易适应。这些按键的功能仍然可以在 UEFI BIOS 中更改。除此以外,还新增了 Co-Pilot 键,并将打印键移至 F9。联想还为键盘增加了许多触觉标记,例如 FN、Enter 和 Ins 以及音量键。这应该会让视障用户更容易使用。
键程(1.5 毫米)和键形等核心数据保持不变;键盘还继续标配 LED 背光(两级)。在这些输入设备上打字的感觉也没有改变;标准尺寸按键的剪刀机构具有非常清晰的压力点。同时,它还具有柔软和清脆的手感,这使得书写文字的感觉非常好。
触摸板和轨迹点
虽然键盘有了很大改动,但触摸板几乎没有变化。它的尺寸(11.5 x 6 厘米)和规格(Mylar 表面、机械点击板)都一样。我们对其光滑的表面和驱动程序的执行没有任何负面评价,其点击机制工作可靠,手感优质。不过,它的表面容易很快变脏,手感也不如玻璃触摸板。但这在使用过程中不会造成任何限制。
另外,你还可以使用红色的 ThinkPad TrackPoint,通过触摸板上方的三个专用按钮来控制鼠标。联想对 TrackPoint 的功能进行了一些扩展:双击指点杆的红色橡胶盖,可以打开一个新的快速设置菜单,其中可以设置音频设置和电池充电阈值。除此之外,制造商 ELAN 生产的 TrackPoint 总体上运行良好,但在这款机型上,它只是比我们习惯的更不稳定、更不精确。此外,有时鼠标指针在接触 TrackPoint 后需要一秒钟才能做出反应。
显示屏:低功耗 LCD 是典型办公应用的理想选择
与大多数 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑一样,联想为其 ThinkPad T14s 5 代提供了一系列不同的显示屏选项。它们的共同点是长宽比均为 16:10,显示屏对角线为 14 英寸:
- WUXGA (1,920 x 1,200), IPS, 400 cd/m², 45 % NTSC, 雾面
- WUXGA(1,920 x 1,200),IPS,400 cd/m²,45 % NTSC,亚光,On cell Touch
- WUXGA(1,920 x 1,200),IPS,400 cd/m²,100 % sRGB,亚光,低功耗
- WUXGA(1,920 x 1,200),IPS,500 cd/m²,100 % sRGB,亚光,电子隐私
- 2.8K(2,880 x 1,800),OLED,400 cd/m²,100 % DCI P3,半光泽/半亚光,HDR,120 Hz
我们测试的这款低功耗显示屏可能是最适合那些只想在工作设备上获得良好显示效果,而不一定需要 OLED 所提供的卓越品质的个人用户的变体。该显示器的平均亮度为 402 cd/m²,达到了承诺的亮度值,在这方面仅次于戴尔 7440 的 WQXGA(2,560 x 1,600)液晶显示器。 戴尔Latitude 7440.
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 406 cd/m²
Contrast: 1845:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.6
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE MNE007JA1-2, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U B140UAK01.2, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES CMN1435, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X ATNA40YK07-1 SDC4171, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Latitude 7440 AU Optronics B140QAX, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -41% | 3% | 27% | 7% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.8 | 39.9 -41% | 70.6 4% | 99.9 47% | 75.4 11% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.2 | 59.7 -40% | 100 1% | 100 1% | 99.9 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70 | 41.2 -41% | 72.4 3% | 93.6 34% | 76.2 9% |
Response Times | 32% | -31% | 94% | -36% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.3 ? | 27.7 ? 22% | 59.7 ? -69% | 2 ? 94% | 56 ? -59% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27.4 ? | 15.9 ? 42% | 25.5 ? 7% | 2 ? 93% | 30.8 ? -12% |
PWM Frequency | 360 ? | ||||
Screen | -86% | -11% | 52% | -39% | |
Brightness middle | 406 | 322.5 -21% | 409 1% | 389.9 -4% | 517.3 27% |
Brightness | 402 | 296 -26% | 391 -3% | 390 -3% | 488 21% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 85 -9% | 92 -1% | 99 6% | 88 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.44 -100% | 0.27 -23% | 0.0497 77% | 0.34 -55% |
Contrast | 1845 | 733 -60% | 1515 -18% | 7845 325% | 1521 -18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2 | 3.72 -86% | 2.3 -15% | 2.22 -11% | 3.3 -65% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.1 | 14.68 -188% | 4.4 14% | 3.75 26% | 7.81 -53% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.6 | 1.9 -217% | 0.9 -50% | 1.02 -70% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 4 -67% | 2.4 -0% | 2.4 -0% | 5.6 -133% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.29 96% | 2.06 107% | 2.187 101% | 2.37 93% |
CCT | 6244 104% | 6064 107% | 6293 103% | 6426 101% | 6804 96% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -32% /
-59% | -13% /
-11% | 58% /
53% | -23% /
-29% |
* ... smaller is better
开箱后,它与理想值的偏差(用 Calman deltaE 值表示)并不是很大,因此即使不对显示器进行校准,其色彩精确度也不差。在使用 X-Rite i1 Pro 3 对面板进行测量和校准后,其 ColorChecker deltaE 值达到了 0.6,可以说色彩准确度非常高。与往常一样,我们创建的配置文件可以在上面的灰色框中免费下载。
配备低功耗显示屏的联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 几乎完全覆盖了小范围的 sRGB 色彩空间,因此使用该设备可以进行简单的图像编辑。
400 cd/m² 的亮度和哑光表面有助于保持显示屏在户外使用时的清晰度--只要你在阴凉处或避免阳光直射即可。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.5 ms rise | |
↘ 12.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
35.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.1 ms rise | |
↘ 18.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
典型的 IPS:色彩保持稳定,没有变化,只是亮度略有下降。
性能:超 5 125U 没有高于平均水平的性能
如前所述,ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 没有 AMD 版本。用户只能选择英特尔酷睿 Ultra,联想共提供了六种不同的处理器供用户选择: Core Ultra 5 125U, 酷睿至尊 5 135U, 酷睿至尊 7 155U, 酷睿至尊 7 165U, 酷睿至尊 7 155H和 酷睿至尊 7 165H-因此分别是非 VPro 机型和企业级机型。H-CPU似乎是特殊配置,因为在联想网站上找不到,至少在德国(本次测试在德国进行)和美国找不到。
联想 ThinkPad T14s G5 从来没有配备专用显卡。因此,大多数用户只能依靠简单的英特尔显卡,而购买 H-CPU 机型的用户则可以获得速度更快的英特尔 ARC 显卡。与其他 T-ThinkPad 不同的是,该机型的内存仍然采用焊接方式,联想为其安装了 16、32 或 64 GB LPDDR5X-7467。至少不再提供 8GB 版本,因为这已经不再是最新的产品了。单个 M.2 2280 SSD 可用作大容量存储,容量最高可达 2TB。
测试条件
与 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑的一贯做法一样,联想使用了三种不同的性能配置文件,可通过 Windows 设置进行选择:
- 最佳节能:PL1 25 瓦/PL2 40 瓦
- 平衡:PL1 27.5 瓦/PL2 40 瓦
- 最佳性能:PL1 30 瓦 / PL2 40 瓦
处理器
英特尔 英特尔酷睿至尊 5 125U是 Meteor Lake-U 系列的基本型号。作为 U 型处理器,它的典型 TDP 范围为 15 瓦至最大 30 瓦。它的两个大型 P 核心频率最高可达 4.3 GHz(基本频率为 1.3 GHz),而 ComputeTile 中的八个 E 核心频率为 0.8 至 3.6 GHz。该芯片还有两个低功耗 E 核,时钟频率为 0.7 至 2.1 GHz。由于两个大型 P 核心使用超线程技术,因此总共有 12 个内核和 14 个线程。如需与其他 CPU 进行更广泛的比较,请参阅我们的 处理器比较列表.
与 T14s Gen 4 Intel 处理器相比,联想明显提高了 ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 的性能。 T14s 4 代英特尔在连续负载情况下,尽管 T14s G4 仍采用 i7 处理器。在单核模式下,2023 ThinkPad 明显优于 2024。在单核模式下 配备 AMD CPU 的 T14s Gen 4的 T14s Gen 4 普遍速度更快,不管是哪种模式--惠普 EliteBook 845 G 也是如此。 惠普 EliteBook 845 G10.
在电池模式下进行的 Cinebench R15 多核测试中,ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 仅获得约 1200 分,而不是约 1600 分。这相当于节流了约 25%。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 -2! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Average of class Office |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (6650 - 10483, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (1534 - 1587, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (2558 - 4033, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (592 - 608, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (1117 - 1680, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (222 - 229, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (328 - 485, n=8) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (28563 - 41152, n=7) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (4492 - 4659, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (8384 - 9601, n=7) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Average of class Office (662 - 14767, n=66, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Office (457 - 2769, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (2129 - 2177, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (7417 - 8581, n=7) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=94, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average of class Office (510 - 1995, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (1531 - 1607, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (7.26 - 12, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (45.5 - 55.5, n=7) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (0.526 - 0.555, n=7) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average of class Office | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (5784 - 9282, n=7) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (29578 - 47366, n=7) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (1565 - 2669, n=7) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (44976 - 47868, n=7) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (4390 - 5507, n=7) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (14563 - 24922, n=7) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (33640 - 48114, n=7) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (457 - 779, n=7) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (2904 - 4846, n=7) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (24082 - 47875, n=7) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=93, last 2 years) |
系统性能
联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 是一款快速系统,在日常使用中运行非常流畅。它在系统性能测试中也表现出色。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (5639 - 6052, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (9582 - 10827, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (7548 - 8306, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (6367 - 6690, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (2049 - 9773, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1363 - 1648, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=88, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1310 - 1382, n=7) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1433 - 1550, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=88, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1066 - 1244, n=7) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (237 - 253, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (224 - 231, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=86, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Office (404 - 1966, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (579 - 594, n=7) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 5780 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (35467 - 82786, n=7) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=94, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (38849 - 63159, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (36830 - 63484, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=94, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (125.5 - 149.8, n=7) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average of class Office (6.9 - 185.2, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 在延迟测试中出现了一些问题,但与其他测试设备相比,这些问题没有那么严重。在 YouTube 测试中几乎没有跳帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
西部数据的 512 GB SSD 是同类产品中速度较慢的解决方案之一。不过,这在日常使用中并不明显。联想安装的固态硬盘来自许多不同的制造商,因此你只有在购买后才能知道自己购买的是哪种型号。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
由于这是一款配备 U-CPU 的机型,我们的测试设备依赖于 英特尔显卡4 Xe 图形单元。没有独立 vRAM 的集成图形处理器受益于四通道配置的快速 LPDDR5X 内存,因此其性能在这方面并不受限。
在对比领域,ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 成功击败了去年英特尔的所有竞争对手。与前几年 i7 CPU 的 96 EU Xe 图形处理器相比,英特尔图形处理器的性能至少提高了 10%。不过,ThinkPad 笔记本电脑未能夺得图形性能桂冠,因为惠普 EliteBook 845 G10 的 AMD Radeon 780M 仍占上风。在 3DMark 合成测试中,AMD 解决方案的速度快了约 20%,在游戏中的差距也差不多。说到游戏:联想 ThinkPad T14s G5 并不适合玩游戏--至少就目前的游戏而言。而《DOTA2》等老游戏即使在高设置下也能流畅运行。因此,下班后想玩玩游戏的休闲玩家可能只能局限于这些游戏。
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4922 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2190 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Average of class Office (3.86 - 35.7, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Average of class Office (13.4 - 121.2, n=95, last 2 years) |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 135.5 | 109 | 21.4 | 8.87 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 90.4 | 72.7 | 62.2 | 56.6 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 48.6 | 24.1 | 17.3 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 37.6 | 30.3 | 25.4 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 17.8 | 12.8 | 10.6 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 18.9 | 15.9 | 12.8 | 11.7 |
F1 24 (2024) | 39.2 | 33.8 |
排放:ThinkPad T14s G5 几乎不发热
噪音排放
在压力测试中,ThinkPad 的单风扇比对比设备的风扇声音更大。但在空闲模式下,散热系统保持安静。总的来说,T14s Gen 5 的声音不大,但也不是特别安静。
我们没有听到测试设备发出任何线圈啸叫。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.4 / 24.4 / 24.4 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32.6 / 39.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.4 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Dell Latitude 7440 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1345U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 0% | 11% | -4% | 8% | |
off / environment * | 24.4 | 24.2 1% | 22.9 6% | 24.9 -2% | 22.8 7% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.4 | 24.2 1% | 22.9 6% | 24.9 -2% | 22.8 7% |
Idle Average * | 24.4 | 24.2 1% | 22.9 6% | 24.9 -2% | 22.8 7% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.4 | 25.6 -5% | 22.9 6% | 24.9 -2% | 22.8 7% |
Load Average * | 32.6 | 33.3 -2% | 24.3 25% | 33 -1% | 26.3 19% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 39.9 | ||||
Load Maximum * | 39.5 | 37.8 4% | 33.9 14% | 45 -14% | 38.3 3% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.4 | 32.4 | 30 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
即使在最大负载下,联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 也几乎不发热;我们在键盘上方测得的温度略高于 40 摄氏度。
压力测试期间没有出现节流现象。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.1 °C / 77.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+2.5 °C / 4.5 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 5% | -13% | -33% | -5% | 4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 40.2 | 39.8 1% | 45.4 -13% | 48.8 -21% | 39 3% | 42.1 -5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 39 | 35.2 10% | 50.6 -30% | 56.5 -45% | 40.6 -4% | 39.7 -2% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26 | 25.6 2% | 26.8 -3% | 33.3 -28% | 28 -8% | 23 12% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.8 | 24.4 5% | 26.8 -4% | 35 -36% | 28.8 -12% | 22.8 12% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
联想将笔记本的扬声器从键盘上方移到了两侧,但这并没有改善扬声器的质量。立体声扬声器仍然过于安静,而且缺乏低音。
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理:电池续航时间可与 AMD 机型媲美
耗电量
英特尔推出 Meteor Lake 的主要目标之一是提高效率。这在总体上似乎取得了不错的效果,因为联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 在闲置时的耗电量是所有商用笔记本电脑中最低的。联想 ThinkPad T14s 第 4 代 AMD在这方面的效率也不高。
ThinkPad 的最大功耗为 68 瓦,高于 65 瓦的电源。不过,由于这只是其峰值功耗,而且功耗很快就会下降,因此在日常使用中不成问题。
Off / Standby | 0.4 / 0.5 Watt |
Idle | 2.3 / 5.1 / 6.7 Watt |
Load |
37.5 / 68.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Latitude 7440 i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Average Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -18% | 2% | -85% | -33% | 4% | -25% | -35% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.3 | 3.1 -35% | 3.2 -39% | 4.9 -113% | 4.5 -96% | 2.7 -17% | 3.71 ? -61% | 4.46 ? -94% |
Idle Average * | 5.1 | 6.5 -27% | 5.1 -0% | 12.5 -145% | 6.5 -27% | 5.2 -2% | 6.77 ? -33% | 7.42 ? -45% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.7 | 7.9 -18% | 5.4 19% | 16.8 -151% | 7.3 -9% | 5.6 16% | 8.31 ? -24% | 8.9 ? -33% |
Load Average * | 37.5 | 40 -7% | 39.1 -4% | 43.8 -17% | 52.5 -40% | 40.1 -7% | 41.3 ? -10% | 42 ? -12% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 41.4 | |||||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 37.8 | |||||||
Load Maximum * | 68.4 | 69 -1% | 46.6 32% | 68.1 -0% | 63 8% | 48.3 29% | 65.5 ? 4% | 61.6 ? 10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.2 | 39.8 | 41.2 | 46.2 | 40.2 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk 2077 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
与前代产品 ThinkPad T14s G4 相比,联想对该设备的电池容量进行了调整,但调整幅度不大:其内置电池容量从 57 瓦时变为 58 瓦时。与前代机型相比,ThinkPad T14s G4 的电池续航时间大幅提升的原因很可能不是这一微小的调整,而是其耗电量更低。在 Wi-Fi 测试(150 cd/m²)中,ThinkPad 的续航时间接近 12 小时,仅略逊于 AMD 竞争产品。在最大亮度下进行的 Wi-Fi 测试中,ThinkPad 的续航时间也很强劲,仍能维持十多个小时。这清楚地表明了低功耗显示器的优势。
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 58 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 51 Wh | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 63 Wh | Dell Latitude 7440 i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 57 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -33% | -11% | 1% | 25% | -2% | -8% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 712 | 476 -33% | 779 9% | 614 -14% | 781 10% | 793 11% | 608 ? -15% |
Load | 117 | 81 -31% | 135 15% | 164 40% | 99 -15% | 117.4 ? 0% |
Pros
Cons
评语:英特尔独占的 ThinkPad T14s 第 5 代非常出色,但并不出众
随着联想ThinkPad T14s Gen 5的发布,制造商在一定程度上简化了其产品系列,因为该机型现在只能购买英特尔CPU,而前一代T14s Gen 4可以购买AMD或英特尔芯片。采用酷睿 Ultra 处理器的超薄高端 T 系列机型与基于英特尔处理器的前代机型相比有以下改进 英特尔芯片的前代产品在许多方面都有所改进,但并没有明显优于 AMD 版本。总而言之,这是一款非常适合商务用户使用的笔记本电脑,对于大型企业客户来说绝对不失为一个好选择。
现在,这款笔记本的机身更加小巧,边框也更加纤薄,但联想仍将所有典型的商务功能和连接选项集成到了这款设备中。作为整套设备的一部分,ThinkPad 的输入设备和键盘也略有改动--不过必须指出的是,该机型的 Trackpoint 功能并不像通常那样好用。联想ThinkPad T14s G5的制造质量和稳定性都非常高,重量也没有因此而减轻。此外,ThinkPad T14s G5 的电池续航时间长,而且几乎不会发热。它的 14 英寸低功耗屏幕非常适合办公应用,而且 ThinkPad 还预装了 WWAN 模块。
我们认为,ThinkPad 没有任何令人失望的缺陷。值得注意的是,与 AMD 解决方案相比,它的性能仍低于平均水平。与其他 T-ThinkPad 相比,T14s Gen 5 的升级选项并不多。这主要包括焊接式内存、无法轻松更换的键盘以及焊接式 Wi-Fi 模块。此外,它的扬声器不够响亮,而且笔记本电脑的外壳也很容易沾上灰尘。
总的来说,联想ThinkPad T14s Gen 5是一款非常适合商务用户使用的笔记本电脑,对于大型企业客户来说绝对不失为一个好选择。
对于企业买家来说,联想 ThinkPad T14s 第 5 代几乎不会出错--它是一款非常适合生产性使用的笔记本电脑,具有许多积极的品质。然而,同样的情况也适用于笔记本电脑,如 惠普 EliteBook 845 G10,它采用 AMD 处理器,性能更高,但重量稍重。联想也在与自己竞争:虽然 T14s 不再有 AMD 机型,但配备高通 Snapdragon X Elite 的联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 最近发布了--对这款非常有趣的笔记本电脑的评测已经在进行中。
价格和供应情况
目前,您可以从亚马逊以1,790.57 美元的价格购买到联想 ThinkPad T14s 5 代。
请注意:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 请点击此处.
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 21LS001PGE
- 07/22/2024 v8
Benjamin Herzig
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.